Support resolving ./foo.js to ./foo.ts

[gustavopch]

For some reason, to use ESM in TypeScript, to import ./foo.ts we need to use import foo from './foo.js', so @esbuild-kit/esm-loader should support that.

Basically, try resolving .js to .ts and .jsx to .tsx.

Related:

• Resolve .tsx + other extensions when importing .js / .jsx files #112 (comment)
• TypeScript resolution not working from JS files (even with allowJs) #135

BTW, consider distributing the library without minification. Minifying just makes it harder to debug locally and use patch-package while providing no benefit.

[SettingDust]

It works fine with import {foo} from 'foo/index.js' on my end
But not with exports map in foo that make . mapping to index.js

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find module 'E:\javascript\esbuild-exports-map-ts\packages\foo\node_modules\@esbuild-exports-map-ts\exports-map\index.js' imported from E:\javascript\esbuild-exports-map-ts\packages\foo\index.ts
    at __node_internal_captureLargerStackTrace (node:internal/errors:496:5)
    at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:405:5)
    at finalizeResolution (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:324:11)
    at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:943:10)
    at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1129:11)
    at nextResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:163:28)
    at u (file:///E:/javascript/esbuild-exports-map-ts/node_modules/.pnpm/@[email protected]/node_modules/@esbuild-kit/esm-loader/dist/index.js:1:2406)
    at nextResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:163:28)
    at ESMLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:835:30)
    at ESMLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:424:18)
    at ModuleWrap.<anonymous> (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:77:40)
    at link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:76:36)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) {
  code: 'ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND'
}

[privatenumber]

Closing as a duplicate of #112

[spearmootz]

i am getting this error. i posted a similar comment on 112.