Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do-not-optimize-curative-cnecs-for-tsos-without-cras and second preventive #1227

Open
phiedw opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@phiedw
Copy link
Collaborator

phiedw commented Dec 6, 2024

Describe the current behavior

In the filler responsible of checking if cnecs should be taken in consideration for minimum margin computation in the mip for cnecs belonging to a tso that does not share RAs, we currently compare the margin after all actions, to the margin before any optimization.

Describe the expected behavior

Instead we should compare it to the margin with preventive actions applied.
This will probably sending a few more inputs to OLF to compute flows/sensitivities.

Describe the steps

No response

Environment

No response

Relevant Log Output

No response

Extra Information

No response

@phiedw phiedw added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 6, 2024
@Godelaine
Copy link
Collaborator

This filler is called on curative states, with preperimeter = initial state + curative network actions applied (coming from curative step before 2P). We'd rather have preperimeter = initial state + preventive remedial actions. This is complex because preventive remedial actions are optimization variables.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants