Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclusive audio device lock. #150

Closed
romeojulietthotel opened this issue May 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Exclusive audio device lock. #150

romeojulietthotel opened this issue May 30, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@romeojulietthotel
Copy link

Pothos takes an exclusive lock on the audio device. I can't think of a reason why it would need to do this. I can run multiple ffplay and they get along fine. But if I then start Pothos while an ffplay is running Pothos spews out errors constantly into the "Message Window".

On stdout I see this:

Expression 'parameters->channelCount <= maxChans' failed in 'src/hostapi/alsa/pa_linux_alsa.c', line: 1513
Expression 'ValidateParameters( outputParameters, hostApi, StreamDirection_Out )' failed in 'src/hostapi/alsa/pa_linux_alsa.c', line: 1845

If I start Pothos and then try to play audio via ffplay, ffplay cannot acquire an audio device due the exclusive lock by Pothos.

I read this:

http://portaudio.com/docs/v19-doxydocs/api_overview.html

I/O Methods: callback and read/write

PortAudio offers two methods for communicating audio data between an open Stream and your Application: (1) an asynchronous callback interface, where PortAudio calls a user defined callback function when new audio data is available or required, and (2) synchronous read and write functions which can be used in a blocking or non-blocking manner. You choose between the two methods when you open a Stream. The two methods are discussed in more detail below.

@guruofquality
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was moved to pothosware/PothosAudio#4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants