-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*: Make use of the upperBound of ticlient's kv_scan interface to ensure no overbound scan will happen (#8081) #8257
*: Make use of the upperBound of ticlient's kv_scan interface to ensure no overbound scan will happen (#8081) #8257
Conversation
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
…re no overbound scan will happen (pingcap#8081)
/run-all-tests pd=release-2.1 tikv=pr/3749 tidb-test=release-2.1 |
/run-all-tests pd=release-2.1 tikv=release-2.1 tidb-test=release-2.1 |
/run-all-tests pd=release-2.1 tikv=release-2.1 tidb-test=release-2.1 |
@MyonKeminta please resolve conflicts. |
/run-all-tests pd=release-2.1 tikv=release-2.1 tidb-test=release-2.1 |
What's happening on the unit test.. |
/run-unit-test |
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What problem does this PR solve?
This PR cherry-picks #8081 (09c6bff) to release-2.1 branch.
This PR should be merged after merging #8247
This fixes in some conditions the kv_scan goes to a deleted range, which may make tikv panic
What is changed and how it works?
This PR cherry-picks #8081 to release-2.1 branch.
Check List
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes