Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: revert #25730 to fix #28011 (#42488) #42500

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #42488

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #28011

Problem Summary: as described in #28011 , kv pairs converted from locks is visible to union-scan, which leads to duplicated rows (one from snapshot and the other from mem-index-reader).

What is changed and how it works?

Since tikv/tikv#13694 has introduced a better solution to the problem of accumulated locks, thus we can simply revert #25730 .

Here is the benchmark result. It shows that there is a slight regression in point-get workload.

2023-03-22_223208
2023-03-22_223259

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Mar 23, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@ti-chi-bot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-5.3 labels Mar 23, 2023
@zyguan
Copy link
Contributor

zyguan commented Mar 23, 2023

tikv/tikv#13694 is unavailable in this release.

@zyguan zyguan closed this Mar 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-5.3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants