-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
privilege,executor: update DBIsVisible() function for RBAC #10261
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ func (s *testPrivilegeSuite) TestCheckAuthenticate(c *C) { | |
mustExec(c, se1, "drop user '[email protected]'@'localhost'") | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (s *testPrivilegeSuite) TestUseDb(c *C) { | ||
func (s *testPrivilegeSuite) TestUseDB(c *C) { | ||
|
||
se := newSession(c, s.store, s.dbName) | ||
// high privileged user | ||
|
@@ -465,6 +465,21 @@ func (s *testPrivilegeSuite) TestUseDb(c *C) { | |
c.Assert(se.Auth(&auth.UserIdentity{Username: "usenobody", Hostname: "localhost", AuthUsername: "usenobody", AuthHostname: "%"}, nil, nil), IsTrue) | ||
_, err = se.Execute(context.Background(), "use mysql") | ||
c.Assert(err, IsNil) | ||
|
||
// test `use db` for role. | ||
c.Assert(se.Auth(&auth.UserIdentity{Username: "usesuper", Hostname: "localhost", AuthUsername: "usesuper", AuthHostname: "%"}, nil, nil), IsTrue) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `CREATE DATABASE app_db`) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `CREATE ROLE 'app_developer'`) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `GRANT ALL ON app_db.* TO 'app_developer'`) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `CREATE USER 'dev'@'localhost'`) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `GRANT 'app_developer' TO 'dev'@'localhost'`) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `SET DEFAULT ROLE 'app_developer' TO 'dev'@'localhost'`) | ||
mustExec(c, se, `FLUSH PRIVILEGES`) | ||
c.Assert(se.Auth(&auth.UserIdentity{Username: "dev", Hostname: "localhost", AuthUsername: "dev", AuthHostname: "localhost"}, nil, nil), IsTrue) | ||
_, err = se.Execute(context.Background(), "use app_db") | ||
c.Assert(err, IsNil) | ||
_, err = se.Execute(context.Background(), "use mysql") | ||
c.Assert(err, NotNil) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (s *testPrivilegeSuite) TestSetGlobal(c *C) { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
r_1
has privilege,r_2
doesn't have, and has relationship liker_1 -> r_2 -> user
, user should have privilege to visit db.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean user has role r_2
r_2 has role r_1 ?
I think
activeRoles
contains both r_1 and r_2 ? @imtbkcatThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ctx.ActiveRoles
just contain r_1, you could useMySQLPrivileges.FindAllRole
to get r_1 and r_2.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
PTAL @imtbkcat