Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (130 loc) · 7.92 KB

Development-experience.md

File metadata and controls

152 lines (130 loc) · 7.92 KB

Development experience creating a media-producing prosthetic for Weavrs

Author: Matt Biddulph

June 2012

In two weeks in May 2012 I created the code in Angles For Weavrs. It's a mixture of Python/Django and Java code that creates a graph visualisation of a Weavr's keyword usage over the preceding week. This document records the process of creating the code.

Architecture and software components

The components of the system are:

  1. Prosthetic web interface (Python using Django on Google Appengine)
  2. Prosthetic job poller (Python)
  3. Commandline graph-visualisation renderer (Java using Gephi)

The web interface is used to add the prosthetic to an individual Weavr via the usual OAuth flow. After a Weavr has been authenticated and the tokens added to the prosthetic's Appengine database, a configuration screen is shown where the user can customise some parameters of the visualisation. The PTK uses Appengine's cron mechanism to call the act method of the Angles prosthetic class to be called on a regular basis (once per day by default) so that it can generate a run of the visualiser. This method uses the oauth tokens supplied by the PTK to retrieve data required for the visualisation (GEXF-format keyword data, latest Colourlovers palette if the Weavr has one, and config settings) and stores it using the PTK's @persist_state mechanism. It then creates an instance of AnglesRun, a database object representing the need to run the visualiser.

The visualiser is a commandline tool that accepts one or more job definitions in JSON format and outputs a PNG. The JSON contains rendering parameters (e.g. opacity and colour palette) as well as embedded graph data in GEXF XML format.

Because the Java/Gephi visualiser requires Java features that are banned on Appengine (e.g. java AWT graphics toolkit), it's necessary to run it on a server elsewhere. This is why we need a separate job poller to coordinate the runs. The poller frequently checks a fixed pending URL on the web interface for a list of jobs to be run. The URL is protected by HTTP Basic Authentication - no OAuth is involved between the poller and the web interface, and the poller never talks to the Weavrs API. This URL returns a list of job data in JSON format by checking for AnglesRun objects whose completed flag is False and dumping the associated state data (that was previously computed in the PTK's cron) for each job. The poller then execs the visualiser once per job, and makes an HTTP POST back to the web interface to complete the job (a separate failure URL is used in the case of something going wrong). This POST uses form-multipart encoding to embed the PNG data.

The handler for the multipart HTTP POST in the web interface does several jobs. Firstly it checks that the identifier supplied matches an actual AnglesRun, rejecting the POST if not. Then it updates the AnglesRun object to mark it as completed. It stores the PNG using the Appengine blobstore mechanism for serving large files, and notes the generated URL. Then it calls the /1/weavr/post API to create a blogpost for the intended Weavr, directly embedding the blobstore URL as an image.

Development process

Consider browsing the project commits at Github for more insight into the development process.

I started by developing the visualisation as a standalone process, without considering the integration into Weavrs. I used sample data from an existing GEXF export project to bootstrap the process. The Gephi visualisation tool is available both as a desktop interface and a Java library. Following the documentation and tutorials and given some existing familiarity with Gephi, it's not too hard to translate an existing visualisation into code. I was provided with samples in the form of Gephi desktop screenshots by David Bausola and developed those into a commandline equivalent.

Once I had code for a visualisation with a fixed set of parameters, I worked on parameterising that code so that it could eventually be customised per Weavr. It made sense to describe the parameters of a rendering job using a JSON config file, since that would be easy to pass around between components of the architecture later. I also created a build.xml config for the Ant build tool so that we could easily build standalone jar files for deployment later.

After the visualisation was ready, I worked with Graham O'Regan who created an instance of the PTK that I could build the prosthetic on. I was able to run this on my development machine using the Google Appengine toolkit. I experimented with this to produce a proof-of-concept prosthetic that simply read some data from the Weavr to which it's attached and output it to the Appengine log. I also explored publishing blogposts through the same mechanism. Then I added the Angles-specific code to extract GEXF data from the Weavr, store it in the persistent state for that Weavr and create an AnglesRun object for the poller to operate on.

To complete the end-to-end test Graham then added the poller framework to the project. I was able to run this on my development machine by pointing its URL settings to my localhost Appengine server. I added basic logging to show that it was reading AnglesRun data correctly, and we gave it a test-run. Once that was working, I tested process spawning by adding a hardcoded run of the renderer to the poller, with a fixed dataset and parameters, that would run each time. Finally this was replaced with data taken from the AnglesRun object, and form-multipart posting of the resulting PNG back to the prosthetic completed the system.

After all this was running correctly, I added an extra web form to the prosthetic web interface, to be shown to the user after the OAuth authentication process. This was done using a redirect in the post_oauth_callback method of the prosthetic.

Testing and deployment

Deploying the prosthetic web interface was simple - Graham created an Appengine instance for it and gave me deployment permissions. I was able to deploy the code directly from the desktop AppEngine Launcher whenever i liked.

I didn't have access to the server that the poller and renderer would run on, so I don't have much insight into their deployment. The biggest delay was caused by Java code that ran fine on my development machine and on a test VM, but didn't work on the server. This may have been due to the use of Java 1.6 in devlopment and Java 1.5 on the server. It was eventually solved by Graham with the addition of some classpath and jar dependencies. He deployed further updates via a pull from the Github repository whenever I had pushed a change.

During testing it was beneficial to set the time_between_runs in the prosthetic to a value of 1, meaning that it was possible to run the cronjob as often as we liked (to generate new AnglesRuns). All prosthetic crons can be manually run by hitting the path /runner/run_cron on the prosthetic's Appengine instance in a web browser. Monitoring its progress via the application logs in the Appengine control panel was also essential.

The Django admin pages at the path /admin were also very useful after authorising a Weavr with the prosthetic. Using these I was able to check what OAuth tokens were authorised. I also added a useful diagnostic link to the AccessToken admin page to view the Angles config.