Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vibrations for collisions with boundaries and shape #117

Open
brettfiedler opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Vibrations for collisions with boundaries and shape #117

brettfiedler opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@brettfiedler
Copy link
Member

brettfiedler commented Apr 5, 2022

We discussed adding vibratory feedback to differentiate two cases in transforming the quad shape:

Case 3: Physical limitation point is reached
Pattern: Fast double buzz, “no-no”
Repeat: No repeat
Intensity: 1.0

Case 4: Screen limitation point is reached
Pattern: Ramping global intensity
Repeat: Continuous
Intensity: 0.25-1.0

In order to make this work, we'll need to be able to distinguish when the shape is being restricted by either internal limitations (side length is too small, vertex or side have collided) or a vertex has hit the play area boundary

@brettfiedler
Copy link
Member Author

brettfiedler commented Apr 5, 2022

Not sure who will work on this or if it will be during overlap - but assigning both JG and JB (feel free to remove if this won't be in your boat)

Not priority until JB has time dedicated to Quad haptic implementation

@jessegreenberg
Copy link
Contributor

jessegreenberg commented Apr 5, 2022

This may be a bit difficult because of #15. Each vertex has a unique shape defines where it is allowed to be. That shape includes the "play area bounds" and is what makes sure the quadrilateral never becomes crossed. In addition there are checks to make sure that vertices and sides do not overlap with eachother.

It may be ideal to resolve #41 first, but understand that may not fit in the timeline for this issue.

@jessegreenberg
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed with @jbphet in conjunction with #104, Ill work on this and it does seem like #41 should be done first ideally.

@brettfiedler brettfiedler changed the title Differentiate when shape is restriction due to internal boundaries or play area boundaries Differentiate when shape is restricted due to internal boundaries or play area boundaries Aug 29, 2022
@brettfiedler brettfiedler removed their assignment Dec 12, 2022
@jessegreenberg
Copy link
Contributor

We are moving forward with this in #127, can this actually be closed?

@jessegreenberg
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, I see this issue is about haptics for those events. Ill rename the issue.

@jessegreenberg jessegreenberg changed the title Differentiate when shape is restricted due to internal boundaries or play area boundaries Vibrations for collisions with boundaries and shape Dec 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants