Installing via venv/pip fails with pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion #7836

Massimo-B · 2024-08-22T12:45:45Z

As dev-db/pgadmin4 got removed from Portage due to yarn issues as mentioned in https://bugs.gentoo.org/794460#c20 …
I tried following https://ogris.de/howtos/gentoo-pgadmin4.html to install via venv/pip. But it's failing due to the kernel version?

$ python3 -m venv ~/opt/pgadmin4
$ . ~/opt/pgadmin4/bin/activate
$ pip install pgadmin4
Collecting pgadmin4
  Downloading pgadmin4-8.11-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (2.9 kB)
ERROR: Exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/cli/base_command.py", line 105, in _run_wrapper
    status = _inner_run()
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/cli/base_command.py", line 96, in _inner_run
    return self.run(options, args)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/cli/req_command.py", line 67, in wrapper
    return func(self, options, args)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/commands/install.py", line 379, in run
    requirement_set = resolver.resolve(
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/resolver.py", line 95, in resolve
    result = self._result = resolver.resolve(
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/resolvers.py", line 546, in resolve
    state = resolution.resolve(requirements, max_rounds=max_rounds)
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/resolvers.py", line 397, in resolve
    self._add_to_criteria(self.state.criteria, r, parent=None)
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/resolvers.py", line 173, in _add_to_criteria
    if not criterion.candidates:
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/structs.py", line 156, in __bool__
    return bool(self._sequence)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/found_candidates.py", line 174, in __bool__
    return any(self)
           ^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/found_candidates.py", line 162, in <genexpr>
    return (c for c in iterator if id(c) not in self._incompatible_ids)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/found_candidates.py", line 53, in _iter_built
    candidate = func()
                ^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/factory.py", line 186, in _make_candidate_from_link
    base: Optional[BaseCandidate] = self._make_base_candidate_from_link(
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/factory.py", line 232, in _make_base_candidate_from_link
    self._link_candidate_cache[link] = LinkCandidate(
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 303, in __init__
    super().__init__(
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 158, in __init__
    self.dist = self._prepare()
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 247, in _prepare
    self._check_metadata_consistency(dist)
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 229, in _check_metadata_consistency
    list(dist.iter_dependencies(list(dist.iter_provided_extras())))
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/metadata/importlib/_dists.py", line 220, in iter_dependencies
    elif any(req.marker.evaluate(context) for context in contexts):
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/metadata/importlib/_dists.py", line 220, in <genexpr>
    elif any(req.marker.evaluate(context) for context in contexts):
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/markers.py", line 325, in evaluate
    return _evaluate_markers(self._markers, current_environment)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/markers.py", line 211, in _evaluate_markers
    groups[-1].append(_evaluate_markers(marker, environment))
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/markers.py", line 225, in _evaluate_markers
    groups[-1].append(_eval_op(lhs_value, op, rhs_value))
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/markers.py", line 183, in _eval_op
    return spec.contains(lhs, prereleases=True)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/specifiers.py", line 552, in contains
    normalized_item = _coerce_version(item)
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/specifiers.py", line 28, in _coerce_version
    version = Version(version)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/mb/opt/pgadmin4/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_vendor/packaging/version.py", line 202, in __init__
    raise InvalidVersion(f"Invalid version: '{version}'")
pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '6.6.30-gentoo'

unames are free form, and expecting it not to contain -gentoo is wrong.

kpinc · 2024-08-22T17:07:50Z

I've the same problem on Ubuntu 22 on MS Azure. The final line of the traceback is:

pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '6.5.0-1025-azure'

I am told that installation works with pip version 24.0 and fails with pip 24.2.

I know that it works with setuptools >= 66, which was where semantic versioning enforcement was turned on for python packages. (Which seems somehow related to the issue.)

libera.net's #python seems to think that the problem is
https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/pkg/pip/setup_pip.py#L48
and that this
python-poetry/poetry#7418
is related.

kpinc · 2024-08-22T17:16:34Z

I am told that this is relevant:
pypa/packaging#774 (comment)

liaohongxing · 2024-08-23T01:07:46Z

debian sid ：

pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '6.10.6-amd64'

adityatoshniwal · 2024-08-23T10:50:40Z

This doesn't look like a pgAdmin issue. Installing with lower pip version works.

kpinc · 2024-08-23T16:30:42Z

On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 03:51:02 -0700 Aditya Toshniwal ***@***.***> wrote: This doesn't look like a pgAdmin issue. Installing with lower pip version works.

This issue should not be closed. Pgadmin should not use pip's version parsing code to parse the kernel version, since pip has specific syntax requirements for version strings. Requirements that the kernel versions do not conform to. Pip may have it's own issue, and might, possibly, make the problem go away. But that does not mean that pgadmin is calling the library appropriate for parsing kernel version strings. Regards, Karl ***@***.***> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein

adityatoshniwal · 2024-08-27T05:55:56Z

On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 03:51:02 -0700 Aditya Toshniwal @.> wrote: This doesn't look like a pgAdmin issue. Installing with lower pip version works.
This issue should not be closed. Pgadmin should not use pip's version parsing code to parse the kernel version, since pip has specific syntax requirements for version strings. Requirements that the kernel versions do not conform to. Pip may have it's own issue, and might, possibly, make the problem go away. But that does not mean that pgadmin is calling the library appropriate for parsing kernel version strings. Regards, Karl @.> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein

pgAdmin isn't parsing any code. It might be some dependency python package.

Massimo-B · 2024-08-27T06:29:09Z

If the issue is on pip side, please provide a installation guide via pip with a detailed description which pip-version pgAdmin depends on.

adityatoshniwal · 2024-08-27T06:34:58Z

If the issue is on pip side, please provide a installation guide via pip with a detailed description which pip-version pgAdmin depends on.

pgAdmin is released on PyPi since long and there were no issues regarding pip version. Packages like pip may release packages any time even after pgAdmin is released and break things.

Massimo-B · 2024-08-30T11:16:43Z

Ok, beside my inofficial page I was following,
this is a bug report against https://www.pgadmin.org/download/pgadmin-4-python/ as it almost does the same like my page and is broken as well.

What can we do? Upstream bug report to pip? Downgrade pip? Is it already solved by the YunoHost-Apps/pgadmin_ynh@65b8094 above?
I just tried again and it still fails.

kpinc · 2024-08-31T03:57:02Z

On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 04:17:05 -0700 Massimo-B ***@***.***> wrote: Ok, beside my inofficial page I was following, this is a bug report against https://www.pgadmin.org/download/pgadmin-4-python/ as it almost does the same like my page and is broken as well. What can we do? Upstream bug report to pip? Downgrade pip? Is it already solved by the YunoHost-Apps/pgadmin_ynh@65b8094 above? I just tried again and it still fails.

I was wrong. PGadmin4 is using the platform_version marker correctly, or at least correctly as far as historical usage goes. Pip is broken. It may take quite some time for it to be fixed, since (it seems) there are problems with the specification. (It seems that using platform_version should, according to the spec, pretty much never work.) As written, PGadmin4 will never work with whatever pip releases are broken in this fashion. That said, there may well be ways to work-around the problem. (E.g. adisbladis/nixpkgs@b2da9da) It occurs to me that one possible work-around might be to re-order the tests in the requirement specifier occurring at: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/pkg/pip/setup_pip.py#L48 _If_ pip's evaluation of requirement specifiers short-circuits and does not necessarily evaluate all the conditions, then putting the platform_release test last will solve the problem on all platforms but that of the ARM64 macOS. This would go a long way toward mitigating the severity of the issue. See also: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/dependency-specifiers/#environment-markers Regards, Karl ***@***.***> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein

Massimo-B · 2024-09-04T06:41:00Z

You mentioned a possible work-around, that would be a change in pgAdmin4 to work-around the bug in pip?
Isn't that pip bug already filed as a bug report? I'm not the best person to describe that as I'm not that much into Python development.

kpinc · 2024-09-04T14:09:29Z

On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 23:41:23 -0700 Massimo-B ***@***.***> wrote: You mentioned a possible work-around, that would be a change in pgAdmin4 to work-around the bug in pip?

Yes. In the Pgadmin4 packaging. Someone would have to try it and then submit a pull request.

Isn't that pip bug already filed as a bug report? I'm not the best person to describe that as I'm not that much into Python development.

The problem with pip exists because of the pip bug already referenced having to do with enforcing python packaging standards. The change that fixed the pip bug exposed issues in the version comparison specification. It is unclear what the resolution will be and whether it will result in a change that will resolve Pgadmin4's issue. Regards, Karl ***@***.***> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein

faridcher · 2024-09-28T20:37:37Z

I also have this problem. I can't install pgadmin from Postgresql Debian repos.
I get:

Unsatisfied dependencies:
 pgadmin4-server : Depends: python3.11 but it is not installable
Error: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

It happened as soon as my Debian Python upgraded to 3.12.

I turned to pip in a virtual environment. I got the same error of this post. It seems pgadmin4 only supports python 3.11 as listed in Pypi page.
I downgraded my pip from 24.2 to 23 but it then failed to install any package with another error:

AttributeError: module 'pkgutil' has no attribute 'ImpImporter'. Did you mean: 'zipimporter'?

I think pgadmin4 should cope with new changes in python3.12.

SIP-Online · 2024-09-30T15:13:17Z

Same problem under Debian 12, and surprised that it is still present despite this new version.
The only way to take advantage of pgAdmin4, and to install version 8.10:
pgadmin4==8.10

We are faced with a situation that everyone has been passing the buck for months, I have installed several projects like Odoo or Pretix, and none of them have caused problems.
So there is something to review on the construction of the package with pip3.
There is a share of responsibility of the staff, and also of the creator of the package: https://pypi.org/project/pgadmin4/

I hope we will have the opportunity to take advantage of a future version !

kpinc · 2024-09-30T17:02:57Z

The pip issue linked to above now has another issue attached which requests that pip requirement specifications be evaluated lazily. pypa/packaging#834 If this is changed in pip, then re-arranging the requirement specs of pgadmin4 would greatly mitigate the problem. I imagine it will take pip some time to address the underlying issue because it is specification related. Meanwhile it would be nice to monitor the "lazy" issue and adjust the pgadmin4 packaging when it is resolved. Or, figure out if there is another way to get the pgadmin4 packaging to have the requirements it needs without bumping into the pip issue.

SIP-Online · 2024-10-02T12:24:01Z

This can be playable by doing a comparison between version 8.10 and version 8.11.
I am not a PIP expert, if we can make dependency conditions on package versions according to the OS/Kernel version, this will solve the problem.

Given the situation, I will immediately stick to it, and I will come back to you with a patch. 😉

SIP-Online · 2024-10-02T14:42:53Z

After research, it is fixed on my side, the culprit is linked to conditions for Darwin environments, the method is not adapted for example for the Python version of Debian 12.
A patch is therefore necessary, here is the method to redo a stable package:

pip3 install wheel
wget "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/bb/22/4635915e990edec92142e5610a344afc085345bc62350f47955d5ae5f778/pgadmin4-8.12-py3-none-any.whl"
python3 -m wheel unpack pgadmin4-8.12-py3-none-any.whl

sed -i '/darwin/ s/\([[:digit:]]\);.*/\1/' "pgadmin4-8.12/pgadmin4-8.12.dist-info/METADATA"
sed -i '/psycopg\[binary\]==3.1.19/d' "pgadmin4-8.12/pgadmin4-8.12.dist-info/METADATA"

python3 -m wheel pack --build-number 2 pgadmin4-8.12
pip3 install pgadmin4-8.12-2-py3-none-any.whl

This solution remains a bandage for those who are on a Linux environment, I leave this responsibility to the staff to find a BSD and Linux compatible patch.

faridcher · 2024-10-02T16:42:21Z

@SIP-Online thank you for the time and the patch

adityatoshniwal · 2024-10-03T05:02:54Z

binary

Re-opening this to see how we can change pgAdmin build code to include this.

ethereal-engineer · 2024-10-19T00:42:00Z

After research, it is fixed on my side, the culprit is linked to conditions for Darwin environments, the method is not adapted for example for the Python version of Debian 12. A patch is therefore necessary, here is the method to redo a stable package:
pip3 install wheel
wget "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/bb/22/4635915e990edec92142e5610a344afc085345bc62350f47955d5ae5f778/pgadmin4-8.12-py3-none-any.whl"
python3 -m wheel unpack pgadmin4-8.12-py3-none-any.whl

sed -i '/darwin/ s/\([[:digit:]]\);.*/\1/' "pgadmin4-8.12/pgadmin4-8.12.dist-info/METADATA"
sed -i '/psycopg\[binary\]==3.1.19/d' "pgadmin4-8.12/pgadmin4-8.12.dist-info/METADATA"

python3 -m wheel pack --build-number 2 pgadmin4-8.12
pip3 install pgadmin4-8.12-2-py3-none-any.whl
This solution remains a bandage for those who are on a Linux environment, I leave this responsibility to the staff to find a BSD and Linux compatible patch.

Tested working on archlinuxarm (aarch64-ARCH)

suisbuds · 2024-10-30T07:45:50Z

After research, it is fixed on my side, the culprit is linked to conditions for Darwin environments, the method is not adapted for example for the Python version of Debian 12. A patch is therefore necessary, here is the method to redo a stable package:
pip3 install wheel
wget "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/bb/22/4635915e990edec92142e5610a344afc085345bc62350f47955d5ae5f778/pgadmin4-8.12-py3-none-any.whl"
python3 -m wheel unpack pgadmin4-8.12-py3-none-any.whl

sed -i '/darwin/ s/\([[:digit:]]\);.*/\1/' "pgadmin4-8.12/pgadmin4-8.12.dist-info/METADATA"
sed -i '/psycopg\[binary\]==3.1.19/d' "pgadmin4-8.12/pgadmin4-8.12.dist-info/METADATA"

python3 -m wheel pack --build-number 2 pgadmin4-8.12
pip3 install pgadmin4-8.12-2-py3-none-any.whl
This solution remains a bandage for those who are on a Linux environment, I leave this responsibility to the staff to find a BSD and Linux compatible patch.

Tested working on arch linux (6.11.5-arch1-1 x86-64)

kamikaze · 2024-12-13T11:03:42Z

thanks for breaking pip install pgadmin4 :)

Massimo-B added the Bug label Aug 22, 2024

akshay-joshi added this to Not Refined Aug 23, 2024

adityatoshniwal closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 23, 2024

github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Not Refined Aug 23, 2024

adityatoshniwal removed this from Not Refined Aug 23, 2024

Josue-T added a commit to YunoHost-Apps/pgadmin_ynh that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2024

Force pip<24.1 to fix pgadmin-org/pgadmin4#7836

65b8094

RohitBhati8269 mentioned this issue Aug 30, 2024

upgrading pgadmin4 in pipx is broken in fedora 40 workstation #7845

Closed

yogeshmahajan-1903 mentioned this issue Sep 18, 2024

Unable to Install latest version (8.11) on Arch Linux #7940

Closed

pravesh-sharma mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2024

Installation with pip fails on Arch #7983

Closed

faridcher mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2024

Add support for Python 3.12 #6813

Closed

adityatoshniwal added this to Not Refined Oct 3, 2024

anilsahoo20 reopened this Oct 4, 2024

anilsahoo20 added this to Current Sprint (182) Oct 4, 2024

anilsahoo20 removed this from Not Refined Oct 4, 2024

anilsahoo20 moved this to 🆕 New in Current Sprint (182) Oct 4, 2024

anilsahoo20 added the EDB Sprint 178 label Oct 4, 2024

anilsahoo20 assigned khushboovashi Oct 4, 2024

akshay-joshi added EDB Sprint 179 Waiting for upstream and removed EDB Sprint 178 EDB Sprint 179 labels Oct 9, 2024

akshay-joshi unassigned khushboovashi Oct 14, 2024

akshay-joshi added this to Waiting for upstream Oct 14, 2024

akshay-joshi removed this from Current Sprint (182) Oct 14, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Installing via venv/pip fails with pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion #7836

Installing via venv/pip fails with pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion #7836

Massimo-B commented Aug 22, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 22, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 22, 2024

liaohongxing commented Aug 23, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 23, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 23, 2024 via email

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 27, 2024

Massimo-B commented Aug 27, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Massimo-B commented Aug 30, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 31, 2024 via email

Massimo-B commented Sep 4, 2024

kpinc commented Sep 4, 2024 via email

faridcher commented Sep 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

SIP-Online commented Sep 30, 2024

kpinc commented Sep 30, 2024 via email

SIP-Online commented Oct 2, 2024

SIP-Online commented Oct 2, 2024

faridcher commented Oct 2, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Oct 3, 2024

ethereal-engineer commented Oct 19, 2024

suisbuds commented Oct 30, 2024 •

edited

Loading

kamikaze commented Dec 13, 2024

Installing via venv/pip fails with pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion #7836

Installing via venv/pip fails with pip._vendor.packaging.version.InvalidVersion #7836

Comments

Massimo-B commented Aug 22, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 22, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 22, 2024

liaohongxing commented Aug 23, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 23, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 23, 2024 via email

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 27, 2024

Massimo-B commented Aug 27, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Massimo-B commented Aug 30, 2024

kpinc commented Aug 31, 2024 via email

Massimo-B commented Sep 4, 2024

kpinc commented Sep 4, 2024 via email

faridcher commented Sep 28, 2024 • edited Loading

SIP-Online commented Sep 30, 2024

kpinc commented Sep 30, 2024 via email

SIP-Online commented Oct 2, 2024

SIP-Online commented Oct 2, 2024

faridcher commented Oct 2, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Oct 3, 2024

ethereal-engineer commented Oct 19, 2024

suisbuds commented Oct 30, 2024 • edited Loading

kamikaze commented Dec 13, 2024

adityatoshniwal commented Aug 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

faridcher commented Sep 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

suisbuds commented Oct 30, 2024 •

edited

Loading