We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copied from Sourcetrail issue: CoatiSoftware#839
Sourcetrail does not appear to find implicit destructor calls.
Being able to find destructor calls would be immensely helpful.
In the mean time, at the least it would be helpful for Sourcetrail to provide a warning message that it does not expect to find them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@catskul: The current indexer only uses the Clang AST, which doesn't provide that information. This Stackoverflow answer "How to get information about call to destructors in Clang LibTooling?" shows that it is necessary to use the 'Control Flow Graph' (CFG) to retrieve that information.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Added with commit 0beeaa0
Please note:
Maybe @mlangkabel or @egraether have a better idea, but they probably don't have time to support a Sourcetrail clone.
Disabled the detection/indexing of the destructor calls with commit bccad3b because of a crash (assertion) in CFG::buildCFG
CFG::buildCFG
Re-enabled the detection/indexing of non-trivial destructor calls, now that Clang-18 is being used.
petermost
No branches or pull requests
Copied from Sourcetrail issue: CoatiSoftware#839
Sourcetrail does not appear to find implicit destructor calls.
Being able to find destructor calls would be immensely helpful.
In the mean time, at the least it would be helpful for Sourcetrail to provide a warning message that it does not expect to find them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: