You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a low-probability bug. When running lrzip-next -t on a file and the user is in a write-protected directory, lrzip-next will fail: This happens whether or not file.lrz is in the write-protected dir, or a non-write-protected dir. If TMP variable is NOT set, the temporary file lrzip-next tries to create will fail in the current dir.
WARNING: Failed to create out tmpfile: ./lrzipout.4GQLS0, will fail if cannot perform compression entirely in ram
Detected lrzip version 0.9.1 file.
MD5 being used for integrity testing.
Decompressing...
Failed to write literal buffer of size 339
Bad file descriptor
Fatal error - exiting
Even though the warning indicates a temp file may not be necessary.
What was expected behavior?
Testing of lrz file can continue if it can be decompressed entirely in ram OR lrzip-next should fail outright
Steps to reproduce
In a write-protected directory, run command lrzip-next -t file.lrz
Relevant log output
$ /share/software/Kernel/linux-5.x$ lrzip-next -vvt /tmp/v*lrz
Using configuration file /home/peter/.lrzip/lrzip.conf
The following options are in effect for this INTEGRITY TEST.
Threading is ENABLED. Number of CPUs detected: 8
Detected 16,558,260,224 bytes ram
Nice Value: 19
Show Progress
Max Verbose
Test file integrity
Temporary Directory set as: ./
WARNING: Failed to create out tmpfile: ./lrzipout.4dl460, will fail if cannot perform compression entirely in ram
Malloced 5,519,417,344 for tmp_outbuf
Failed to fstatvfs in decompress_file
Fatal error - exiting
Please provide system details
OS Distro: Slackware64-current
Kernel Version (uname -a): 5.19.1
System ram (free -h):
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 15Gi 1.3Gi 11Gi 483Mi 2.2Gi 13Gi
Swap: 15Gi 0B 15Gi
Additional Context
When TMP environment variable is set, this error does not occur. Temp file will be created in TMP directory. However, when TMP is not set, temp file will be created in current directory. Also, the warning message that says the test can be run entirely in RAM is not occurring. This warning should either fail completely or some coding needs changing to allow running in RAM. This error also occurs in the main branch of lrzip version 0.651.
Not sure the best way to address this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lrzip-next Version
0.9.1
lrzip-next command line
lrzip-next -t file.lrz
What happened?
This is a low-probability bug. When running
lrzip-next -t
on a file and the user is in a write-protected directory,lrzip-next
will fail: This happens whether or not file.lrz is in the write-protected dir, or a non-write-protected dir. If TMP variable is NOT set, the temporary filelrzip-next
tries to create will fail in the current dir.Even though the warning indicates a temp file may not be necessary.
What was expected behavior?
Testing of lrz file can continue if it can be decompressed entirely in ram OR
lrzip-next
should fail outrightSteps to reproduce
In a write-protected directory, run command
lrzip-next -t file.lrz
Relevant log output
Please provide system details
OS Distro: Slackware64-current
Kernel Version (uname -a): 5.19.1
System ram (free -h):
Additional Context
When TMP environment variable is set, this error does not occur. Temp file will be created in TMP directory. However, when TMP is not set, temp file will be created in current directory. Also, the warning message that says the test can be run entirely in RAM is not occurring. This warning should either fail completely or some coding needs changing to allow running in RAM. This error also occurs in the main branch of
lrzip
version 0.651.Not sure the best way to address this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: