-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
toooooo slow test on the Freiburg RGBD dataset #13
Comments
If you run the bag file without running chisel, how fast does it play back? Also, are you compiling in Release mode? |
hi mklingen,Thank you for your answer. I'm sure on the release model, and I think this is independent of |
I made some changes recently which should make IntegrateDepthScan a bit faster. I will push these sometime this week, and I'll let you know. At the time when I was running this on the Freiburg dataset I was getting ~10Hz out of it in Release mode. ( The parameters which will affect the performance the most are voxel resolution ( |
hi mklingen, i am looking forward to your updated version. I will try to change the parameters and test the time again. |
In my test, Chunk's size is also important. When resolution is 5cm, it is the fastest that chunk's size is 4x4x4. |
hi:
i test chisel on my desktop equipped with Intel® Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz × 8, and i run the launch_freiburg_dataset.launch with fault parameters . every update frame i can get nice reconstruction result, but too slow( Almost 3 seconds). i have no idea if there are some important parameters need to be set, or some significant things to be all attention. thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: