You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
To decide what part of the liquidity graph to explore, the DEX uses a combination of fixed candidates that act as safe defaults, as well as dynamically elected candidates based on a liquidity heuristic (#2843).
Now that the IBC implementation is coming together, it would be good to actually test the liquidity indexing by depositing a large number of assets and asserting that the subset of the graph that is explored matches the pairs with most counterparty liquidity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To clarify, this issue is not about testing IBC-equivalency. Instead, this is about testing that the liquidity indices that the path search algo. The connection with IBC is that we can test that non-default assets are used by making IBC deposits, posting positions for those assets, and making sure that these assets are routable.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
To decide what part of the liquidity graph to explore, the DEX uses a combination of fixed candidates that act as safe defaults, as well as dynamically elected candidates based on a liquidity heuristic (#2843).
Now that the IBC implementation is coming together, it would be good to actually test the liquidity indexing by depositing a large number of assets and asserting that the subset of the graph that is explored matches the pairs with most counterparty liquidity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: