diff --git a/.DS_Store b/.DS_Store new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d1a47c6 Binary files /dev/null and b/.DS_Store differ diff --git a/.idea/.name b/.idea/.name new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8a66d40 --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/.name @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +wef \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.idea/compiler.xml b/.idea/compiler.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..217af47 --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/compiler.xml @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ + + + + + + diff --git a/.idea/copyright/profiles_settings.xml b/.idea/copyright/profiles_settings.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e7bedf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/copyright/profiles_settings.xml @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.idea/encodings.xml b/.idea/encodings.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e206d70 --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/encodings.xml @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ + + + + + diff --git a/.idea/misc.xml b/.idea/misc.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..be6bf0a --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/misc.xml @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ + + + + + + + diff --git a/.idea/modules.xml b/.idea/modules.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..46cd2fe --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/modules.xml @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/.idea/scopes/scope_settings.xml b/.idea/scopes/scope_settings.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..922003b --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/scopes/scope_settings.xml @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.idea/uiDesigner.xml b/.idea/uiDesigner.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b00020 --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/uiDesigner.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/.idea/vcs.xml b/.idea/vcs.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..def6a6a --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/vcs.xml @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ + + + + + + + diff --git a/.idea/workspace.xml b/.idea/workspace.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bb96b8b --- /dev/null +++ b/.idea/workspace.xml @@ -0,0 +1,584 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Android Lint + + + Error handling + + + + + Abstraction issues + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + localhost + 5050 + + + + + + + 1400928959098 + 1400928959098 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/bubbles.html b/bubbles.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bd4a00c --- /dev/null +++ b/bubbles.html @@ -0,0 +1,319 @@ + + + + + + - jsFiddle demo + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/css/bootstrap.min.css b/css/bootstrap.min.css new file mode 100644 index 0000000..679272d --- /dev/null +++ b/css/bootstrap.min.css @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +/*! + * Bootstrap v3.1.1 (http://getbootstrap.com) + * Copyright 2011-2014 Twitter, Inc. + * Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE) + */ + +/*! normalize.css v3.0.0 | MIT License | git.io/normalize */html{font-family:sans-serif;-ms-text-size-adjust:100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:100%}body{margin:0}article,aside,details,figcaption,figure,footer,header,hgroup,main,nav,section,summary{display:block}audio,canvas,progress,video{display:inline-block;vertical-align:baseline}audio:not([controls]){display:none;height:0}[hidden],template{display:none}a{background:0 0}a:active,a:hover{outline:0}abbr[title]{border-bottom:1px dotted}b,strong{font-weight:700}dfn{font-style:italic}h1{font-size:2em;margin:.67em 0}mark{background:#ff0;color:#000}small{font-size:80%}sub,sup{font-size:75%;line-height:0;position:relative;vertical-align:baseline}sup{top:-.5em}sub{bottom:-.25em}img{border:0}svg:not(:root){overflow:hidden}figure{margin:1em 40px}hr{-moz-box-sizing:content-box;box-sizing:content-box;height:0}pre{overflow:auto}code,kbd,pre,samp{font-family:monospace,monospace;font-size:1em}button,input,optgroup,select,textarea{color:inherit;font:inherit;margin:0}button{overflow:visible}button,select{text-transform:none}button,html input[type=button],input[type=reset],input[type=submit]{-webkit-appearance:button;cursor:pointer}button[disabled],html input[disabled]{cursor:default}button::-moz-focus-inner,input::-moz-focus-inner{border:0;padding:0}input{line-height:normal}input[type=checkbox],input[type=radio]{box-sizing:border-box;padding:0}input[type=number]::-webkit-inner-spin-button,input[type=number]::-webkit-outer-spin-button{height:auto}input[type=search]{-webkit-appearance:textfield;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;box-sizing:content-box}input[type=search]::-webkit-search-cancel-button,input[type=search]::-webkit-search-decoration{-webkit-appearance:none}fieldset{border:1px solid silver;margin:0 2px;padding:.35em .625em .75em}legend{border:0;padding:0}textarea{overflow:auto}optgroup{font-weight:700}table{border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0}td,th{padding:0}@media print{*{text-shadow:none!important;color:#000!important;background:transparent!important;box-shadow:none!important}a,a:visited{text-decoration:underline}a[href]:after{content:" (" attr(href) ")"}abbr[title]:after{content:" (" attr(title) ")"}a[href^="javascript:"]:after,a[href^="#"]:after{content:""}pre,blockquote{border:1px solid #999;page-break-inside:avoid}thead{display:table-header-group}tr,img{page-break-inside:avoid}img{max-width:100%!important}p,h2,h3{orphans:3;widows:3}h2,h3{page-break-after:avoid}select{background:#fff!important}.navbar{display:none}.table td,.table th{background-color:#fff!important}.btn>.caret,.dropup>.btn>.caret{border-top-color:#000!important}.label{border:1px solid #000}.table{border-collapse:collapse!important}.table-bordered th,.table-bordered td{border:1px solid #ddd!important}}*{-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box}:before,:after{-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box}html{font-size:62.5%;-webkit-tap-highlight-color:rgba(0,0,0,0)}body{font-family:"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:1.42857143;color:#333;background-color:#fff}input,button,select,textarea{font-family:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit}a{color:#428bca;text-decoration:none}a:hover,a:focus{color:#2a6496;text-decoration:underline}a:focus{outline:thin dotted;outline:5px auto -webkit-focus-ring-color;outline-offset:-2px}figure{margin:0}img{vertical-align:middle}.img-responsive,.thumbnail>img,.thumbnail a>img,.carousel-inner>.item>img,.carousel-inner>.item>a>img{display:block;max-width:100%;height:auto}.img-rounded{border-radius:6px}.img-thumbnail{padding:4px;line-height:1.42857143;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ddd;border-radius:4px;-webkit-transition:all .2s ease-in-out;transition:all .2s ease-in-out;display:inline-block;max-width:100%;height:auto}.img-circle{border-radius:50%}hr{margin-top:20px;margin-bottom:20px;border:0;border-top:1px solid #eee}.sr-only{position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px;margin:-1px;padding:0;overflow:hidden;clip:rect(0,0,0,0);border:0}h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,.h1,.h2,.h3,.h4,.h5,.h6{font-family:inherit;font-weight:500;line-height:1.1;color:inherit}h1 small,h2 small,h3 small,h4 small,h5 small,h6 small,.h1 small,.h2 small,.h3 small,.h4 small,.h5 small,.h6 small,h1 .small,h2 .small,h3 .small,h4 .small,h5 .small,h6 .small,.h1 .small,.h2 .small,.h3 .small,.h4 .small,.h5 .small,.h6 .small{font-weight:400;line-height:1;color:#999}h1,.h1,h2,.h2,h3,.h3{margin-top:20px;margin-bottom:10px}h1 small,.h1 small,h2 small,.h2 small,h3 small,.h3 small,h1 .small,.h1 .small,h2 .small,.h2 .small,h3 .small,.h3 .small{font-size:65%}h4,.h4,h5,.h5,h6,.h6{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px}h4 small,.h4 small,h5 small,.h5 small,h6 small,.h6 small,h4 .small,.h4 .small,h5 .small,.h5 .small,h6 .small,.h6 .small{font-size:75%}h1,.h1{font-size:36px}h2,.h2{font-size:30px}h3,.h3{font-size:24px}h4,.h4{font-size:18px}h5,.h5{font-size:14px}h6,.h6{font-size:12px}p{margin:0 0 10px}.lead{margin-bottom:20px;font-size:16px;font-weight:200;line-height:1.4}@media (min-width:768px){.lead{font-size:21px}}small,.small{font-size:85%}cite{font-style:normal}.text-left{text-align:left}.text-right{text-align:right}.text-center{text-align:center}.text-justify{text-align:justify}.text-muted{color:#999}.text-primary{color:#428bca}a.text-primary:hover{color:#3071a9}.text-success{color:#3c763d}a.text-success:hover{color:#2b542c}.text-info{color:#31708f}a.text-info:hover{color:#245269}.text-warning{color:#8a6d3b}a.text-warning:hover{color:#66512c}.text-danger{color:#a94442}a.text-danger:hover{color:#843534}.bg-primary{color:#fff;background-color:#428bca}a.bg-primary:hover{background-color:#3071a9}.bg-success{background-color:#dff0d8}a.bg-success:hover{background-color:#c1e2b3}.bg-info{background-color:#d9edf7}a.bg-info:hover{background-color:#afd9ee}.bg-warning{background-color:#fcf8e3}a.bg-warning:hover{background-color:#f7ecb5}.bg-danger{background-color:#f2dede}a.bg-danger:hover{background-color:#e4b9b9}.page-header{padding-bottom:9px;margin:40px 0 20px;border-bottom:1px solid #eee}ul,ol{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:10px}ul ul,ol ul,ul ol,ol ol{margin-bottom:0}.list-unstyled{padding-left:0;list-style:none}.list-inline{padding-left:0;list-style:none;margin-left:-5px}.list-inline>li{display:inline-block;padding-left:5px;padding-right:5px}dl{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:20px}dt,dd{line-height:1.42857143}dt{font-weight:700}dd{margin-left:0}@media (min-width:768px){.dl-horizontal dt{float:left;width:160px;clear:left;text-align:right;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;white-space:nowrap}.dl-horizontal dd{margin-left:180px}}abbr[title],abbr[data-original-title]{cursor:help;border-bottom:1px dotted #999}.initialism{font-size:90%;text-transform:uppercase}blockquote{padding:10px 20px;margin:0 0 20px;font-size:17.5px;border-left:5px solid #eee}blockquote p:last-child,blockquote ul:last-child,blockquote ol:last-child{margin-bottom:0}blockquote footer,blockquote small,blockquote .small{display:block;font-size:80%;line-height:1.42857143;color:#999}blockquote footer:before,blockquote small:before,blockquote .small:before{content:'\2014 \00A0'}.blockquote-reverse,blockquote.pull-right{padding-right:15px;padding-left:0;border-right:5px solid #eee;border-left:0;text-align:right}.blockquote-reverse footer:before,blockquote.pull-right footer:before,.blockquote-reverse small:before,blockquote.pull-right small:before,.blockquote-reverse .small:before,blockquote.pull-right .small:before{content:''}.blockquote-reverse footer:after,blockquote.pull-right footer:after,.blockquote-reverse small:after,blockquote.pull-right small:after,.blockquote-reverse .small:after,blockquote.pull-right .small:after{content:'\00A0 \2014'}blockquote:before,blockquote:after{content:""}address{margin-bottom:20px;font-style:normal;line-height:1.42857143}code,kbd,pre,samp{font-family:Menlo,Monaco,Consolas,"Courier New",monospace}code{padding:2px 4px;font-size:90%;color:#c7254e;background-color:#f9f2f4;white-space:nowrap;border-radius:4px}kbd{padding:2px 4px;font-size:90%;color:#fff;background-color:#333;border-radius:3px;box-shadow:inset 0 -1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.25)}pre{display:block;padding:9.5px;margin:0 0 10px;font-size:13px;line-height:1.42857143;word-break:break-all;word-wrap:break-word;color:#333;background-color:#f5f5f5;border:1px solid #ccc;border-radius:4px}pre code{padding:0;font-size:inherit;color:inherit;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent;border-radius:0}.pre-scrollable{max-height:340px;overflow-y:scroll}.container{margin-right:auto;margin-left:auto;padding-left:15px;padding-right:15px}@media (min-width:768px){.container{width:750px}}@media (min-width:992px){.container{width:970px}}@media (min-width:1200px){.container{width:1170px}}.container-fluid{margin-right:auto;margin-left:auto;padding-left:15px;padding-right:15px}.row{margin-left:-15px;margin-right:-15px}.col-xs-1,.col-sm-1,.col-md-1,.col-lg-1,.col-xs-2,.col-sm-2,.col-md-2,.col-lg-2,.col-xs-3,.col-sm-3,.col-md-3,.col-lg-3,.col-xs-4,.col-sm-4,.col-md-4,.col-lg-4,.col-xs-5,.col-sm-5,.col-md-5,.col-lg-5,.col-xs-6,.col-sm-6,.col-md-6,.col-lg-6,.col-xs-7,.col-sm-7,.col-md-7,.col-lg-7,.col-xs-8,.col-sm-8,.col-md-8,.col-lg-8,.col-xs-9,.col-sm-9,.col-md-9,.col-lg-9,.col-xs-10,.col-sm-10,.col-md-10,.col-lg-10,.col-xs-11,.col-sm-11,.col-md-11,.col-lg-11,.col-xs-12,.col-sm-12,.col-md-12,.col-lg-12{position:relative;min-height:1px;padding-left:15px;padding-right:15px}.col-xs-1,.col-xs-2,.col-xs-3,.col-xs-4,.col-xs-5,.col-xs-6,.col-xs-7,.col-xs-8,.col-xs-9,.col-xs-10,.col-xs-11,.col-xs-12{float:left}.col-xs-12{width:100%}.col-xs-11{width:91.66666667%}.col-xs-10{width:83.33333333%}.col-xs-9{width:75%}.col-xs-8{width:66.66666667%}.col-xs-7{width:58.33333333%}.col-xs-6{width:50%}.col-xs-5{width:41.66666667%}.col-xs-4{width:33.33333333%}.col-xs-3{width:25%}.col-xs-2{width:16.66666667%}.col-xs-1{width:8.33333333%}.col-xs-pull-12{right:100%}.col-xs-pull-11{right:91.66666667%}.col-xs-pull-10{right:83.33333333%}.col-xs-pull-9{right:75%}.col-xs-pull-8{right:66.66666667%}.col-xs-pull-7{right:58.33333333%}.col-xs-pull-6{right:50%}.col-xs-pull-5{right:41.66666667%}.col-xs-pull-4{right:33.33333333%}.col-xs-pull-3{right:25%}.col-xs-pull-2{right:16.66666667%}.col-xs-pull-1{right:8.33333333%}.col-xs-pull-0{right:0}.col-xs-push-12{left:100%}.col-xs-push-11{left:91.66666667%}.col-xs-push-10{left:83.33333333%}.col-xs-push-9{left:75%}.col-xs-push-8{left:66.66666667%}.col-xs-push-7{left:58.33333333%}.col-xs-push-6{left:50%}.col-xs-push-5{left:41.66666667%}.col-xs-push-4{left:33.33333333%}.col-xs-push-3{left:25%}.col-xs-push-2{left:16.66666667%}.col-xs-push-1{left:8.33333333%}.col-xs-push-0{left:0}.col-xs-offset-12{margin-left:100%}.col-xs-offset-11{margin-left:91.66666667%}.col-xs-offset-10{margin-left:83.33333333%}.col-xs-offset-9{margin-left:75%}.col-xs-offset-8{margin-left:66.66666667%}.col-xs-offset-7{margin-left:58.33333333%}.col-xs-offset-6{margin-left:50%}.col-xs-offset-5{margin-left:41.66666667%}.col-xs-offset-4{margin-left:33.33333333%}.col-xs-offset-3{margin-left:25%}.col-xs-offset-2{margin-left:16.66666667%}.col-xs-offset-1{margin-left:8.33333333%}.col-xs-offset-0{margin-left:0}@media (min-width:768px){.col-sm-1,.col-sm-2,.col-sm-3,.col-sm-4,.col-sm-5,.col-sm-6,.col-sm-7,.col-sm-8,.col-sm-9,.col-sm-10,.col-sm-11,.col-sm-12{float:left}.col-sm-12{width:100%}.col-sm-11{width:91.66666667%}.col-sm-10{width:83.33333333%}.col-sm-9{width:75%}.col-sm-8{width:66.66666667%}.col-sm-7{width:58.33333333%}.col-sm-6{width:50%}.col-sm-5{width:41.66666667%}.col-sm-4{width:33.33333333%}.col-sm-3{width:25%}.col-sm-2{width:16.66666667%}.col-sm-1{width:8.33333333%}.col-sm-pull-12{right:100%}.col-sm-pull-11{right:91.66666667%}.col-sm-pull-10{right:83.33333333%}.col-sm-pull-9{right:75%}.col-sm-pull-8{right:66.66666667%}.col-sm-pull-7{right:58.33333333%}.col-sm-pull-6{right:50%}.col-sm-pull-5{right:41.66666667%}.col-sm-pull-4{right:33.33333333%}.col-sm-pull-3{right:25%}.col-sm-pull-2{right:16.66666667%}.col-sm-pull-1{right:8.33333333%}.col-sm-pull-0{right:0}.col-sm-push-12{left:100%}.col-sm-push-11{left:91.66666667%}.col-sm-push-10{left:83.33333333%}.col-sm-push-9{left:75%}.col-sm-push-8{left:66.66666667%}.col-sm-push-7{left:58.33333333%}.col-sm-push-6{left:50%}.col-sm-push-5{left:41.66666667%}.col-sm-push-4{left:33.33333333%}.col-sm-push-3{left:25%}.col-sm-push-2{left:16.66666667%}.col-sm-push-1{left:8.33333333%}.col-sm-push-0{left:0}.col-sm-offset-12{margin-left:100%}.col-sm-offset-11{margin-left:91.66666667%}.col-sm-offset-10{margin-left:83.33333333%}.col-sm-offset-9{margin-left:75%}.col-sm-offset-8{margin-left:66.66666667%}.col-sm-offset-7{margin-left:58.33333333%}.col-sm-offset-6{margin-left:50%}.col-sm-offset-5{margin-left:41.66666667%}.col-sm-offset-4{margin-left:33.33333333%}.col-sm-offset-3{margin-left:25%}.col-sm-offset-2{margin-left:16.66666667%}.col-sm-offset-1{margin-left:8.33333333%}.col-sm-offset-0{margin-left:0}}@media (min-width:992px){.col-md-1,.col-md-2,.col-md-3,.col-md-4,.col-md-5,.col-md-6,.col-md-7,.col-md-8,.col-md-9,.col-md-10,.col-md-11,.col-md-12{float:left}.col-md-12{width:100%}.col-md-11{width:91.66666667%}.col-md-10{width:83.33333333%}.col-md-9{width:75%}.col-md-8{width:66.66666667%}.col-md-7{width:58.33333333%}.col-md-6{width:50%}.col-md-5{width:41.66666667%}.col-md-4{width:33.33333333%}.col-md-3{width:25%}.col-md-2{width:16.66666667%}.col-md-1{width:8.33333333%}.col-md-pull-12{right:100%}.col-md-pull-11{right:91.66666667%}.col-md-pull-10{right:83.33333333%}.col-md-pull-9{right:75%}.col-md-pull-8{right:66.66666667%}.col-md-pull-7{right:58.33333333%}.col-md-pull-6{right:50%}.col-md-pull-5{right:41.66666667%}.col-md-pull-4{right:33.33333333%}.col-md-pull-3{right:25%}.col-md-pull-2{right:16.66666667%}.col-md-pull-1{right:8.33333333%}.col-md-pull-0{right:0}.col-md-push-12{left:100%}.col-md-push-11{left:91.66666667%}.col-md-push-10{left:83.33333333%}.col-md-push-9{left:75%}.col-md-push-8{left:66.66666667%}.col-md-push-7{left:58.33333333%}.col-md-push-6{left:50%}.col-md-push-5{left:41.66666667%}.col-md-push-4{left:33.33333333%}.col-md-push-3{left:25%}.col-md-push-2{left:16.66666667%}.col-md-push-1{left:8.33333333%}.col-md-push-0{left:0}.col-md-offset-12{margin-left:100%}.col-md-offset-11{margin-left:91.66666667%}.col-md-offset-10{margin-left:83.33333333%}.col-md-offset-9{margin-left:75%}.col-md-offset-8{margin-left:66.66666667%}.col-md-offset-7{margin-left:58.33333333%}.col-md-offset-6{margin-left:50%}.col-md-offset-5{margin-left:41.66666667%}.col-md-offset-4{margin-left:33.33333333%}.col-md-offset-3{margin-left:25%}.col-md-offset-2{margin-left:16.66666667%}.col-md-offset-1{margin-left:8.33333333%}.col-md-offset-0{margin-left:0}}@media (min-width:1200px){.col-lg-1,.col-lg-2,.col-lg-3,.col-lg-4,.col-lg-5,.col-lg-6,.col-lg-7,.col-lg-8,.col-lg-9,.col-lg-10,.col-lg-11,.col-lg-12{float:left}.col-lg-12{width:100%}.col-lg-11{width:91.66666667%}.col-lg-10{width:83.33333333%}.col-lg-9{width:75%}.col-lg-8{width:66.66666667%}.col-lg-7{width:58.33333333%}.col-lg-6{width:50%}.col-lg-5{width:41.66666667%}.col-lg-4{width:33.33333333%}.col-lg-3{width:25%}.col-lg-2{width:16.66666667%}.col-lg-1{width:8.33333333%}.col-lg-pull-12{right:100%}.col-lg-pull-11{right:91.66666667%}.col-lg-pull-10{right:83.33333333%}.col-lg-pull-9{right:75%}.col-lg-pull-8{right:66.66666667%}.col-lg-pull-7{right:58.33333333%}.col-lg-pull-6{right:50%}.col-lg-pull-5{right:41.66666667%}.col-lg-pull-4{right:33.33333333%}.col-lg-pull-3{right:25%}.col-lg-pull-2{right:16.66666667%}.col-lg-pull-1{right:8.33333333%}.col-lg-pull-0{right:0}.col-lg-push-12{left:100%}.col-lg-push-11{left:91.66666667%}.col-lg-push-10{left:83.33333333%}.col-lg-push-9{left:75%}.col-lg-push-8{left:66.66666667%}.col-lg-push-7{left:58.33333333%}.col-lg-push-6{left:50%}.col-lg-push-5{left:41.66666667%}.col-lg-push-4{left:33.33333333%}.col-lg-push-3{left:25%}.col-lg-push-2{left:16.66666667%}.col-lg-push-1{left:8.33333333%}.col-lg-push-0{left:0}.col-lg-offset-12{margin-left:100%}.col-lg-offset-11{margin-left:91.66666667%}.col-lg-offset-10{margin-left:83.33333333%}.col-lg-offset-9{margin-left:75%}.col-lg-offset-8{margin-left:66.66666667%}.col-lg-offset-7{margin-left:58.33333333%}.col-lg-offset-6{margin-left:50%}.col-lg-offset-5{margin-left:41.66666667%}.col-lg-offset-4{margin-left:33.33333333%}.col-lg-offset-3{margin-left:25%}.col-lg-offset-2{margin-left:16.66666667%}.col-lg-offset-1{margin-left:8.33333333%}.col-lg-offset-0{margin-left:0}}table{max-width:100%;background-color:transparent}th{text-align:left}.table{width:100%;margin-bottom:20px}.table>thead>tr>th,.table>tbody>tr>th,.table>tfoot>tr>th,.table>thead>tr>td,.table>tbody>tr>td,.table>tfoot>tr>td{padding:8px;line-height:1.42857143;vertical-align:top;border-top:1px solid #ddd}.table>thead>tr>th{vertical-align:bottom;border-bottom:2px solid #ddd}.table>caption+thead>tr:first-child>th,.table>colgroup+thead>tr:first-child>th,.table>thead:first-child>tr:first-child>th,.table>caption+thead>tr:first-child>td,.table>colgroup+thead>tr:first-child>td,.table>thead:first-child>tr:first-child>td{border-top:0}.table>tbody+tbody{border-top:2px solid #ddd}.table .table{background-color:#fff}.table-condensed>thead>tr>th,.table-condensed>tbody>tr>th,.table-condensed>tfoot>tr>th,.table-condensed>thead>tr>td,.table-condensed>tbody>tr>td,.table-condensed>tfoot>tr>td{padding:5px}.table-bordered{border:1px solid #ddd}.table-bordered>thead>tr>th,.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th,.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th,.table-bordered>thead>tr>td,.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td,.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td{border:1px solid #ddd}.table-bordered>thead>tr>th,.table-bordered>thead>tr>td{border-bottom-width:2px}.table-striped>tbody>tr:nth-child(odd)>td,.table-striped>tbody>tr:nth-child(odd)>th{background-color:#f9f9f9}.table-hover>tbody>tr:hover>td,.table-hover>tbody>tr:hover>th{background-color:#f5f5f5}table col[class*=col-]{position:static;float:none;display:table-column}table td[class*=col-],table th[class*=col-]{position:static;float:none;display:table-cell}.table>thead>tr>td.active,.table>tbody>tr>td.active,.table>tfoot>tr>td.active,.table>thead>tr>th.active,.table>tbody>tr>th.active,.table>tfoot>tr>th.active,.table>thead>tr.active>td,.table>tbody>tr.active>td,.table>tfoot>tr.active>td,.table>thead>tr.active>th,.table>tbody>tr.active>th,.table>tfoot>tr.active>th{background-color:#f5f5f5}.table-hover>tbody>tr>td.active:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr>th.active:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr.active:hover>td,.table-hover>tbody>tr.active:hover>th{background-color:#e8e8e8}.table>thead>tr>td.success,.table>tbody>tr>td.success,.table>tfoot>tr>td.success,.table>thead>tr>th.success,.table>tbody>tr>th.success,.table>tfoot>tr>th.success,.table>thead>tr.success>td,.table>tbody>tr.success>td,.table>tfoot>tr.success>td,.table>thead>tr.success>th,.table>tbody>tr.success>th,.table>tfoot>tr.success>th{background-color:#dff0d8}.table-hover>tbody>tr>td.success:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr>th.success:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr.success:hover>td,.table-hover>tbody>tr.success:hover>th{background-color:#d0e9c6}.table>thead>tr>td.info,.table>tbody>tr>td.info,.table>tfoot>tr>td.info,.table>thead>tr>th.info,.table>tbody>tr>th.info,.table>tfoot>tr>th.info,.table>thead>tr.info>td,.table>tbody>tr.info>td,.table>tfoot>tr.info>td,.table>thead>tr.info>th,.table>tbody>tr.info>th,.table>tfoot>tr.info>th{background-color:#d9edf7}.table-hover>tbody>tr>td.info:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr>th.info:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr.info:hover>td,.table-hover>tbody>tr.info:hover>th{background-color:#c4e3f3}.table>thead>tr>td.warning,.table>tbody>tr>td.warning,.table>tfoot>tr>td.warning,.table>thead>tr>th.warning,.table>tbody>tr>th.warning,.table>tfoot>tr>th.warning,.table>thead>tr.warning>td,.table>tbody>tr.warning>td,.table>tfoot>tr.warning>td,.table>thead>tr.warning>th,.table>tbody>tr.warning>th,.table>tfoot>tr.warning>th{background-color:#fcf8e3}.table-hover>tbody>tr>td.warning:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr>th.warning:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr.warning:hover>td,.table-hover>tbody>tr.warning:hover>th{background-color:#faf2cc}.table>thead>tr>td.danger,.table>tbody>tr>td.danger,.table>tfoot>tr>td.danger,.table>thead>tr>th.danger,.table>tbody>tr>th.danger,.table>tfoot>tr>th.danger,.table>thead>tr.danger>td,.table>tbody>tr.danger>td,.table>tfoot>tr.danger>td,.table>thead>tr.danger>th,.table>tbody>tr.danger>th,.table>tfoot>tr.danger>th{background-color:#f2dede}.table-hover>tbody>tr>td.danger:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr>th.danger:hover,.table-hover>tbody>tr.danger:hover>td,.table-hover>tbody>tr.danger:hover>th{background-color:#ebcccc}@media (max-width:767px){.table-responsive{width:100%;margin-bottom:15px;overflow-y:hidden;overflow-x:scroll;-ms-overflow-style:-ms-autohiding-scrollbar;border:1px solid #ddd;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}.table-responsive>.table{margin-bottom:0}.table-responsive>.table>thead>tr>th,.table-responsive>.table>tbody>tr>th,.table-responsive>.table>tfoot>tr>th,.table-responsive>.table>thead>tr>td,.table-responsive>.table>tbody>tr>td,.table-responsive>.table>tfoot>tr>td{white-space:nowrap}.table-responsive>.table-bordered{border:0}.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>th:first-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th:first-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th:first-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>td:first-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td:first-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td:first-child{border-left:0}.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>th:last-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th:last-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th:last-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>td:last-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td:last-child,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td:last-child{border-right:0}.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:last-child>th,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr:last-child>th,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:last-child>td,.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr:last-child>td{border-bottom:0}}fieldset{padding:0;margin:0;border:0;min-width:0}legend{display:block;width:100%;padding:0;margin-bottom:20px;font-size:21px;line-height:inherit;color:#333;border:0;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e5e5}label{display:inline-block;margin-bottom:5px;font-weight:700}input[type=search]{-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box}input[type=radio],input[type=checkbox]{margin:4px 0 0;margin-top:1px \9;line-height:normal}input[type=file]{display:block}input[type=range]{display:block;width:100%}select[multiple],select[size]{height:auto}input[type=file]:focus,input[type=radio]:focus,input[type=checkbox]:focus{outline:thin dotted;outline:5px auto -webkit-focus-ring-color;outline-offset:-2px}output{display:block;padding-top:7px;font-size:14px;line-height:1.42857143;color:#555}.form-control{display:block;width:100%;height:34px;padding:6px 12px;font-size:14px;line-height:1.42857143;color:#555;background-color:#fff;background-image:none;border:1px solid #ccc;border-radius:4px;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075);-webkit-transition:border-color ease-in-out .15s,box-shadow ease-in-out .15s;transition:border-color ease-in-out .15s,box-shadow ease-in-out .15s}.form-control:focus{border-color:#66afe9;outline:0;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 8px rgba(102,175,233,.6);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 8px rgba(102,175,233,.6)}.form-control::-moz-placeholder{color:#999;opacity:1}.form-control:-ms-input-placeholder{color:#999}.form-control::-webkit-input-placeholder{color:#999}.form-control[disabled],.form-control[readonly],fieldset[disabled] .form-control{cursor:not-allowed;background-color:#eee;opacity:1}textarea.form-control{height:auto}input[type=search]{-webkit-appearance:none}input[type=date]{line-height:34px}.form-group{margin-bottom:15px}.radio,.checkbox{display:block;min-height:20px;margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;padding-left:20px}.radio label,.checkbox label{display:inline;font-weight:400;cursor:pointer}.radio input[type=radio],.radio-inline input[type=radio],.checkbox input[type=checkbox],.checkbox-inline input[type=checkbox]{float:left;margin-left:-20px}.radio+.radio,.checkbox+.checkbox{margin-top:-5px}.radio-inline,.checkbox-inline{display:inline-block;padding-left:20px;margin-bottom:0;vertical-align:middle;font-weight:400;cursor:pointer}.radio-inline+.radio-inline,.checkbox-inline+.checkbox-inline{margin-top:0;margin-left:10px}input[type=radio][disabled],input[type=checkbox][disabled],.radio[disabled],.radio-inline[disabled],.checkbox[disabled],.checkbox-inline[disabled],fieldset[disabled] input[type=radio],fieldset[disabled] input[type=checkbox],fieldset[disabled] .radio,fieldset[disabled] .radio-inline,fieldset[disabled] .checkbox,fieldset[disabled] .checkbox-inline{cursor:not-allowed}.input-sm{height:30px;padding:5px 10px;font-size:12px;line-height:1.5;border-radius:3px}select.input-sm{height:30px;line-height:30px}textarea.input-sm,select[multiple].input-sm{height:auto}.input-lg{height:46px;padding:10px 16px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.33;border-radius:6px}select.input-lg{height:46px;line-height:46px}textarea.input-lg,select[multiple].input-lg{height:auto}.has-feedback{position:relative}.has-feedback .form-control{padding-right:42.5px}.has-feedback .form-control-feedback{position:absolute;top:25px;right:0;display:block;width:34px;height:34px;line-height:34px;text-align:center}.has-success .help-block,.has-success .control-label,.has-success .radio,.has-success .checkbox,.has-success .radio-inline,.has-success .checkbox-inline{color:#3c763d}.has-success .form-control{border-color:#3c763d;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075)}.has-success .form-control:focus{border-color:#2b542c;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 6px #67b168;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 6px #67b168}.has-success .input-group-addon{color:#3c763d;border-color:#3c763d;background-color:#dff0d8}.has-success .form-control-feedback{color:#3c763d}.has-warning .help-block,.has-warning .control-label,.has-warning .radio,.has-warning .checkbox,.has-warning .radio-inline,.has-warning .checkbox-inline{color:#8a6d3b}.has-warning .form-control{border-color:#8a6d3b;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075)}.has-warning .form-control:focus{border-color:#66512c;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 6px #c0a16b;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 6px #c0a16b}.has-warning .input-group-addon{color:#8a6d3b;border-color:#8a6d3b;background-color:#fcf8e3}.has-warning .form-control-feedback{color:#8a6d3b}.has-error .help-block,.has-error .control-label,.has-error .radio,.has-error .checkbox,.has-error .radio-inline,.has-error .checkbox-inline{color:#a94442}.has-error .form-control{border-color:#a94442;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075)}.has-error .form-control:focus{border-color:#843534;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 6px #ce8483;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.075),0 0 6px #ce8483}.has-error .input-group-addon{color:#a94442;border-color:#a94442;background-color:#f2dede}.has-error .form-control-feedback{color:#a94442}.form-control-static{margin-bottom:0}.help-block{display:block;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;color:#737373}@media (min-width:768px){.form-inline .form-group{display:inline-block;margin-bottom:0;vertical-align:middle}.form-inline .form-control{display:inline-block;width:auto;vertical-align:middle}.form-inline .input-group>.form-control{width:100%}.form-inline .control-label{margin-bottom:0;vertical-align:middle}.form-inline .radio,.form-inline .checkbox{display:inline-block;margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;padding-left:0;vertical-align:middle}.form-inline .radio input[type=radio],.form-inline .checkbox input[type=checkbox]{float:none;margin-left:0}.form-inline .has-feedback .form-control-feedback{top:0}}.form-horizontal .control-label,.form-horizontal .radio,.form-horizontal .checkbox,.form-horizontal .radio-inline,.form-horizontal .checkbox-inline{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;padding-top:7px}.form-horizontal .radio,.form-horizontal .checkbox{min-height:27px}.form-horizontal .form-group{margin-left:-15px;margin-right:-15px}.form-horizontal .form-control-static{padding-top:7px}@media (min-width:768px){.form-horizontal .control-label{text-align:right}}.form-horizontal .has-feedback .form-control-feedback{top:0;right:15px}.btn{display:inline-block;margin-bottom:0;font-weight:400;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle;cursor:pointer;background-image:none;border:1px solid transparent;white-space:nowrap;padding:6px 12px;font-size:14px;line-height:1.42857143;border-radius:4px;-webkit-user-select:none;-moz-user-select:none;-ms-user-select:none;user-select:none}.btn:focus,.btn:active:focus,.btn.active:focus{outline:thin dotted;outline:5px auto -webkit-focus-ring-color;outline-offset:-2px}.btn:hover,.btn:focus{color:#333;text-decoration:none}.btn:active,.btn.active{outline:0;background-image:none;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 3px 5px rgba(0,0,0,.125);box-shadow:inset 0 3px 5px rgba(0,0,0,.125)}.btn.disabled,.btn[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn{cursor:not-allowed;pointer-events:none;opacity:.65;filter:alpha(opacity=65);-webkit-box-shadow:none;box-shadow:none}.btn-default{color:#333;background-color:#fff;border-color:#ccc}.btn-default:hover,.btn-default:focus,.btn-default:active,.btn-default.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-default{color:#333;background-color:#ebebeb;border-color:#adadad}.btn-default:active,.btn-default.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-default{background-image:none}.btn-default.disabled,.btn-default[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-default,.btn-default.disabled:hover,.btn-default[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-default:hover,.btn-default.disabled:focus,.btn-default[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-default:focus,.btn-default.disabled:active,.btn-default[disabled]:active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-default:active,.btn-default.disabled.active,.btn-default[disabled].active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-default.active{background-color:#fff;border-color:#ccc}.btn-default .badge{color:#fff;background-color:#333}.btn-primary{color:#fff;background-color:#428bca;border-color:#357ebd}.btn-primary:hover,.btn-primary:focus,.btn-primary:active,.btn-primary.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-primary{color:#fff;background-color:#3276b1;border-color:#285e8e}.btn-primary:active,.btn-primary.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-primary{background-image:none}.btn-primary.disabled,.btn-primary[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-primary,.btn-primary.disabled:hover,.btn-primary[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-primary:hover,.btn-primary.disabled:focus,.btn-primary[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-primary:focus,.btn-primary.disabled:active,.btn-primary[disabled]:active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-primary:active,.btn-primary.disabled.active,.btn-primary[disabled].active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-primary.active{background-color:#428bca;border-color:#357ebd}.btn-primary .badge{color:#428bca;background-color:#fff}.btn-success{color:#fff;background-color:#5cb85c;border-color:#4cae4c}.btn-success:hover,.btn-success:focus,.btn-success:active,.btn-success.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-success{color:#fff;background-color:#47a447;border-color:#398439}.btn-success:active,.btn-success.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-success{background-image:none}.btn-success.disabled,.btn-success[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-success,.btn-success.disabled:hover,.btn-success[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-success:hover,.btn-success.disabled:focus,.btn-success[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-success:focus,.btn-success.disabled:active,.btn-success[disabled]:active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-success:active,.btn-success.disabled.active,.btn-success[disabled].active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-success.active{background-color:#5cb85c;border-color:#4cae4c}.btn-success .badge{color:#5cb85c;background-color:#fff}.btn-info{color:#fff;background-color:#5bc0de;border-color:#46b8da}.btn-info:hover,.btn-info:focus,.btn-info:active,.btn-info.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-info{color:#fff;background-color:#39b3d7;border-color:#269abc}.btn-info:active,.btn-info.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-info{background-image:none}.btn-info.disabled,.btn-info[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-info,.btn-info.disabled:hover,.btn-info[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-info:hover,.btn-info.disabled:focus,.btn-info[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-info:focus,.btn-info.disabled:active,.btn-info[disabled]:active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-info:active,.btn-info.disabled.active,.btn-info[disabled].active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-info.active{background-color:#5bc0de;border-color:#46b8da}.btn-info .badge{color:#5bc0de;background-color:#fff}.btn-warning{color:#fff;background-color:#f0ad4e;border-color:#eea236}.btn-warning:hover,.btn-warning:focus,.btn-warning:active,.btn-warning.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-warning{color:#fff;background-color:#ed9c28;border-color:#d58512}.btn-warning:active,.btn-warning.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-warning{background-image:none}.btn-warning.disabled,.btn-warning[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-warning,.btn-warning.disabled:hover,.btn-warning[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-warning:hover,.btn-warning.disabled:focus,.btn-warning[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-warning:focus,.btn-warning.disabled:active,.btn-warning[disabled]:active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-warning:active,.btn-warning.disabled.active,.btn-warning[disabled].active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-warning.active{background-color:#f0ad4e;border-color:#eea236}.btn-warning .badge{color:#f0ad4e;background-color:#fff}.btn-danger{color:#fff;background-color:#d9534f;border-color:#d43f3a}.btn-danger:hover,.btn-danger:focus,.btn-danger:active,.btn-danger.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-danger{color:#fff;background-color:#d2322d;border-color:#ac2925}.btn-danger:active,.btn-danger.active,.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-danger{background-image:none}.btn-danger.disabled,.btn-danger[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-danger,.btn-danger.disabled:hover,.btn-danger[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-danger:hover,.btn-danger.disabled:focus,.btn-danger[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-danger:focus,.btn-danger.disabled:active,.btn-danger[disabled]:active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-danger:active,.btn-danger.disabled.active,.btn-danger[disabled].active,fieldset[disabled] .btn-danger.active{background-color:#d9534f;border-color:#d43f3a}.btn-danger .badge{color:#d9534f;background-color:#fff}.btn-link{color:#428bca;font-weight:400;cursor:pointer;border-radius:0}.btn-link,.btn-link:active,.btn-link[disabled],fieldset[disabled] .btn-link{background-color:transparent;-webkit-box-shadow:none;box-shadow:none}.btn-link,.btn-link:hover,.btn-link:focus,.btn-link:active{border-color:transparent}.btn-link:hover,.btn-link:focus{color:#2a6496;text-decoration:underline;background-color:transparent}.btn-link[disabled]:hover,fieldset[disabled] .btn-link:hover,.btn-link[disabled]:focus,fieldset[disabled] .btn-link:focus{color:#999;text-decoration:none}.btn-lg,.btn-group-lg>.btn{padding:10px 16px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.33;border-radius:6px}.btn-sm,.btn-group-sm>.btn{padding:5px 10px;font-size:12px;line-height:1.5;border-radius:3px}.btn-xs,.btn-group-xs>.btn{padding:1px 5px;font-size:12px;line-height:1.5;border-radius:3px}.btn-block{display:block;width:100%;padding-left:0;padding-right:0}.btn-block+.btn-block{margin-top:5px}input[type=submit].btn-block,input[type=reset].btn-block,input[type=button].btn-block{width:100%}.fade{opacity:0;-webkit-transition:opacity .15s linear;transition:opacity .15s linear}.fade.in{opacity:1}.collapse{display:none}.collapse.in{display:block}.collapsing{position:relative;height:0;overflow:hidden;-webkit-transition:height .35s ease;transition:height .35s ease}@font-face{font-family:'Glyphicons Halflings';src:url(../fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.eot);src:url(../fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.eot?#iefix) format('embedded-opentype'),url(../fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff) format('woff'),url(../fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf) format('truetype'),url(../fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg#glyphicons_halflingsregular) format('svg')}.glyphicon{position:relative;top:1px;display:inline-block;font-family:'Glyphicons Halflings';font-style:normal;font-weight:400;line-height:1;-webkit-font-smoothing:antialiased;-moz-osx-font-smoothing:grayscale}.glyphicon-asterisk:before{content:"\2a"}.glyphicon-plus:before{content:"\2b"}.glyphicon-euro:before{content:"\20ac"}.glyphicon-minus:before{content:"\2212"}.glyphicon-cloud:before{content:"\2601"}.glyphicon-envelope:before{content:"\2709"}.glyphicon-pencil:before{content:"\270f"}.glyphicon-glass:before{content:"\e001"}.glyphicon-music:before{content:"\e002"}.glyphicon-search:before{content:"\e003"}.glyphicon-heart:before{content:"\e005"}.glyphicon-star:before{content:"\e006"}.glyphicon-star-empty:before{content:"\e007"}.glyphicon-user:before{content:"\e008"}.glyphicon-film:before{content:"\e009"}.glyphicon-th-large:before{content:"\e010"}.glyphicon-th:before{content:"\e011"}.glyphicon-th-list:before{content:"\e012"}.glyphicon-ok:before{content:"\e013"}.glyphicon-remove:before{content:"\e014"}.glyphicon-zoom-in:before{content:"\e015"}.glyphicon-zoom-out:before{content:"\e016"}.glyphicon-off:before{content:"\e017"}.glyphicon-signal:before{content:"\e018"}.glyphicon-cog:before{content:"\e019"}.glyphicon-trash:before{content:"\e020"}.glyphicon-home:before{content:"\e021"}.glyphicon-file:before{content:"\e022"}.glyphicon-time:before{content:"\e023"}.glyphicon-road:before{content:"\e024"}.glyphicon-download-alt:before{content:"\e025"}.glyphicon-download:before{content:"\e026"}.glyphicon-upload:before{content:"\e027"}.glyphicon-inbox:before{content:"\e028"}.glyphicon-play-circle:before{content:"\e029"}.glyphicon-repeat:before{content:"\e030"}.glyphicon-refresh:before{content:"\e031"}.glyphicon-list-alt:before{content:"\e032"}.glyphicon-lock:before{content:"\e033"}.glyphicon-flag:before{content:"\e034"}.glyphicon-headphones:before{content:"\e035"}.glyphicon-volume-off:before{content:"\e036"}.glyphicon-volume-down:before{content:"\e037"}.glyphicon-volume-up:before{content:"\e038"}.glyphicon-qrcode:before{content:"\e039"}.glyphicon-barcode:before{content:"\e040"}.glyphicon-tag:before{content:"\e041"}.glyphicon-tags:before{content:"\e042"}.glyphicon-book:before{content:"\e043"}.glyphicon-bookmark:before{content:"\e044"}.glyphicon-print:before{content:"\e045"}.glyphicon-camera:before{content:"\e046"}.glyphicon-font:before{content:"\e047"}.glyphicon-bold:before{content:"\e048"}.glyphicon-italic:before{content:"\e049"}.glyphicon-text-height:before{content:"\e050"}.glyphicon-text-width:before{content:"\e051"}.glyphicon-align-left:before{content:"\e052"}.glyphicon-align-center:before{content:"\e053"}.glyphicon-align-right:before{content:"\e054"}.glyphicon-align-justify:before{content:"\e055"}.glyphicon-list:before{content:"\e056"}.glyphicon-indent-left:before{content:"\e057"}.glyphicon-indent-right:before{content:"\e058"}.glyphicon-facetime-video:before{content:"\e059"}.glyphicon-picture:before{content:"\e060"}.glyphicon-map-marker:before{content:"\e062"}.glyphicon-adjust:before{content:"\e063"}.glyphicon-tint:before{content:"\e064"}.glyphicon-edit:before{content:"\e065"}.glyphicon-share:before{content:"\e066"}.glyphicon-check:before{content:"\e067"}.glyphicon-move:before{content:"\e068"}.glyphicon-step-backward:before{content:"\e069"}.glyphicon-fast-backward:before{content:"\e070"}.glyphicon-backward:before{content:"\e071"}.glyphicon-play:before{content:"\e072"}.glyphicon-pause:before{content:"\e073"}.glyphicon-stop:before{content:"\e074"}.glyphicon-forward:before{content:"\e075"}.glyphicon-fast-forward:before{content:"\e076"}.glyphicon-step-forward:before{content:"\e077"}.glyphicon-eject:before{content:"\e078"}.glyphicon-chevron-left:before{content:"\e079"}.glyphicon-chevron-right:before{content:"\e080"}.glyphicon-plus-sign:before{content:"\e081"}.glyphicon-minus-sign:before{content:"\e082"}.glyphicon-remove-sign:before{content:"\e083"}.glyphicon-ok-sign:before{content:"\e084"}.glyphicon-question-sign:before{content:"\e085"}.glyphicon-info-sign:before{content:"\e086"}.glyphicon-screenshot:before{content:"\e087"}.glyphicon-remove-circle:before{content:"\e088"}.glyphicon-ok-circle:before{content:"\e089"}.glyphicon-ban-circle:before{content:"\e090"}.glyphicon-arrow-left:before{content:"\e091"}.glyphicon-arrow-right:before{content:"\e092"}.glyphicon-arrow-up:before{content:"\e093"}.glyphicon-arrow-down:before{content:"\e094"}.glyphicon-share-alt:before{content:"\e095"}.glyphicon-resize-full:before{content:"\e096"}.glyphicon-resize-small:before{content:"\e097"}.glyphicon-exclamation-sign:before{content:"\e101"}.glyphicon-gift:before{content:"\e102"}.glyphicon-leaf:before{content:"\e103"}.glyphicon-fire:before{content:"\e104"}.glyphicon-eye-open:before{content:"\e105"}.glyphicon-eye-close:before{content:"\e106"}.glyphicon-warning-sign:before{content:"\e107"}.glyphicon-plane:before{content:"\e108"}.glyphicon-calendar:before{content:"\e109"}.glyphicon-random:before{content:"\e110"}.glyphicon-comment:before{content:"\e111"}.glyphicon-magnet:before{content:"\e112"}.glyphicon-chevron-up:before{content:"\e113"}.glyphicon-chevron-down:before{content:"\e114"}.glyphicon-retweet:before{content:"\e115"}.glyphicon-shopping-cart:before{content:"\e116"}.glyphicon-folder-close:before{content:"\e117"}.glyphicon-folder-open:before{content:"\e118"}.glyphicon-resize-vertical:before{content:"\e119"}.glyphicon-resize-horizontal:before{content:"\e120"}.glyphicon-hdd:before{content:"\e121"}.glyphicon-bullhorn:before{content:"\e122"}.glyphicon-bell:before{content:"\e123"}.glyphicon-certificate:before{content:"\e124"}.glyphicon-thumbs-up:before{content:"\e125"}.glyphicon-thumbs-down:before{content:"\e126"}.glyphicon-hand-right:before{content:"\e127"}.glyphicon-hand-left:before{content:"\e128"}.glyphicon-hand-up:before{content:"\e129"}.glyphicon-hand-down:before{content:"\e130"}.glyphicon-circle-arrow-right:before{content:"\e131"}.glyphicon-circle-arrow-left:before{content:"\e132"}.glyphicon-circle-arrow-up:before{content:"\e133"}.glyphicon-circle-arrow-down:before{content:"\e134"}.glyphicon-globe:before{content:"\e135"}.glyphicon-wrench:before{content:"\e136"}.glyphicon-tasks:before{content:"\e137"}.glyphicon-filter:before{content:"\e138"}.glyphicon-briefcase:before{content:"\e139"}.glyphicon-fullscreen:before{content:"\e140"}.glyphicon-dashboard:before{content:"\e141"}.glyphicon-paperclip:before{content:"\e142"}.glyphicon-heart-empty:before{content:"\e143"}.glyphicon-link:before{content:"\e144"}.glyphicon-phone:before{content:"\e145"}.glyphicon-pushpin:before{content:"\e146"}.glyphicon-usd:before{content:"\e148"}.glyphicon-gbp:before{content:"\e149"}.glyphicon-sort:before{content:"\e150"}.glyphicon-sort-by-alphabet:before{content:"\e151"}.glyphicon-sort-by-alphabet-alt:before{content:"\e152"}.glyphicon-sort-by-order:before{content:"\e153"}.glyphicon-sort-by-order-alt:before{content:"\e154"}.glyphicon-sort-by-attributes:before{content:"\e155"}.glyphicon-sort-by-attributes-alt:before{content:"\e156"}.glyphicon-unchecked:before{content:"\e157"}.glyphicon-expand:before{content:"\e158"}.glyphicon-collapse-down:before{content:"\e159"}.glyphicon-collapse-up:before{content:"\e160"}.glyphicon-log-in:before{content:"\e161"}.glyphicon-flash:before{content:"\e162"}.glyphicon-log-out:before{content:"\e163"}.glyphicon-new-window:before{content:"\e164"}.glyphicon-record:before{content:"\e165"}.glyphicon-save:before{content:"\e166"}.glyphicon-open:before{content:"\e167"}.glyphicon-saved:before{content:"\e168"}.glyphicon-import:before{content:"\e169"}.glyphicon-export:before{content:"\e170"}.glyphicon-send:before{content:"\e171"}.glyphicon-floppy-disk:before{content:"\e172"}.glyphicon-floppy-saved:before{content:"\e173"}.glyphicon-floppy-remove:before{content:"\e174"}.glyphicon-floppy-save:before{content:"\e175"}.glyphicon-floppy-open:before{content:"\e176"}.glyphicon-credit-card:before{content:"\e177"}.glyphicon-transfer:before{content:"\e178"}.glyphicon-cutlery:before{content:"\e179"}.glyphicon-header:before{content:"\e180"}.glyphicon-compressed:before{content:"\e181"}.glyphicon-earphone:before{content:"\e182"}.glyphicon-phone-alt:before{content:"\e183"}.glyphicon-tower:before{content:"\e184"}.glyphicon-stats:before{content:"\e185"}.glyphicon-sd-video:before{content:"\e186"}.glyphicon-hd-video:before{content:"\e187"}.glyphicon-subtitles:before{content:"\e188"}.glyphicon-sound-stereo:before{content:"\e189"}.glyphicon-sound-dolby:before{content:"\e190"}.glyphicon-sound-5-1:before{content:"\e191"}.glyphicon-sound-6-1:before{content:"\e192"}.glyphicon-sound-7-1:before{content:"\e193"}.glyphicon-copyright-mark:before{content:"\e194"}.glyphicon-registration-mark:before{content:"\e195"}.glyphicon-cloud-download:before{content:"\e197"}.glyphicon-cloud-upload:before{content:"\e198"}.glyphicon-tree-conifer:before{content:"\e199"}.glyphicon-tree-deciduous:before{content:"\e200"}.caret{display:inline-block;width:0;height:0;margin-left:2px;vertical-align:middle;border-top:4px solid;border-right:4px solid transparent;border-left:4px solid transparent}.dropdown{position:relative}.dropdown-toggle:focus{outline:0}.dropdown-menu{position:absolute;top:100%;left:0;z-index:1000;display:none;float:left;min-width:160px;padding:5px 0;margin:2px 0 0;list-style:none;font-size:14px;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ccc;border:1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.15);border-radius:4px;-webkit-box-shadow:0 6px 12px rgba(0,0,0,.175);box-shadow:0 6px 12px rgba(0,0,0,.175);background-clip:padding-box}.dropdown-menu.pull-right{right:0;left:auto}.dropdown-menu .divider{height:1px;margin:9px 0;overflow:hidden;background-color:#e5e5e5}.dropdown-menu>li>a{display:block;padding:3px 20px;clear:both;font-weight:400;line-height:1.42857143;color:#333;white-space:nowrap}.dropdown-menu>li>a:hover,.dropdown-menu>li>a:focus{text-decoration:none;color:#262626;background-color:#f5f5f5}.dropdown-menu>.active>a,.dropdown-menu>.active>a:hover,.dropdown-menu>.active>a:focus{color:#fff;text-decoration:none;outline:0;background-color:#428bca}.dropdown-menu>.disabled>a,.dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:hover,.dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:focus{color:#999}.dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:hover,.dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:focus{text-decoration:none;background-color:transparent;background-image:none;filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(enabled=false);cursor:not-allowed}.open>.dropdown-menu{display:block}.open>a{outline:0}.dropdown-menu-right{left:auto;right:0}.dropdown-menu-left{left:0;right:auto}.dropdown-header{display:block;padding:3px 20px;font-size:12px;line-height:1.42857143;color:#999}.dropdown-backdrop{position:fixed;left:0;right:0;bottom:0;top:0;z-index:990}.pull-right>.dropdown-menu{right:0;left:auto}.dropup .caret,.navbar-fixed-bottom .dropdown .caret{border-top:0;border-bottom:4px solid;content:""}.dropup .dropdown-menu,.navbar-fixed-bottom .dropdown .dropdown-menu{top:auto;bottom:100%;margin-bottom:1px}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-right .dropdown-menu{left:auto;right:0}.navbar-right .dropdown-menu-left{left:0;right:auto}}.btn-group,.btn-group-vertical{position:relative;display:inline-block;vertical-align:middle}.btn-group>.btn,.btn-group-vertical>.btn{position:relative;float:left}.btn-group>.btn:hover,.btn-group-vertical>.btn:hover,.btn-group>.btn:focus,.btn-group-vertical>.btn:focus,.btn-group>.btn:active,.btn-group-vertical>.btn:active,.btn-group>.btn.active,.btn-group-vertical>.btn.active{z-index:2}.btn-group>.btn:focus,.btn-group-vertical>.btn:focus{outline:0}.btn-group .btn+.btn,.btn-group .btn+.btn-group,.btn-group .btn-group+.btn,.btn-group .btn-group+.btn-group{margin-left:-1px}.btn-toolbar{margin-left:-5px}.btn-toolbar .btn-group,.btn-toolbar .input-group{float:left}.btn-toolbar>.btn,.btn-toolbar>.btn-group,.btn-toolbar>.input-group{margin-left:5px}.btn-group>.btn:not(:first-child):not(:last-child):not(.dropdown-toggle){border-radius:0}.btn-group>.btn:first-child{margin-left:0}.btn-group>.btn:first-child:not(:last-child):not(.dropdown-toggle){border-bottom-right-radius:0;border-top-right-radius:0}.btn-group>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child),.btn-group>.dropdown-toggle:not(:first-child){border-bottom-left-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.btn-group>.btn-group{float:left}.btn-group>.btn-group:not(:first-child):not(:last-child)>.btn{border-radius:0}.btn-group>.btn-group:first-child>.btn:last-child,.btn-group>.btn-group:first-child>.dropdown-toggle{border-bottom-right-radius:0;border-top-right-radius:0}.btn-group>.btn-group:last-child>.btn:first-child{border-bottom-left-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.btn-group .dropdown-toggle:active,.btn-group.open .dropdown-toggle{outline:0}.btn-group>.btn+.dropdown-toggle{padding-left:8px;padding-right:8px}.btn-group>.btn-lg+.dropdown-toggle{padding-left:12px;padding-right:12px}.btn-group.open .dropdown-toggle{-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 3px 5px rgba(0,0,0,.125);box-shadow:inset 0 3px 5px rgba(0,0,0,.125)}.btn-group.open .dropdown-toggle.btn-link{-webkit-box-shadow:none;box-shadow:none}.btn .caret{margin-left:0}.btn-lg .caret{border-width:5px 5px 0;border-bottom-width:0}.dropup .btn-lg .caret{border-width:0 5px 5px}.btn-group-vertical>.btn,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group>.btn{display:block;float:none;width:100%;max-width:100%}.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group>.btn{float:none}.btn-group-vertical>.btn+.btn,.btn-group-vertical>.btn+.btn-group,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group+.btn,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group+.btn-group{margin-top:-1px;margin-left:0}.btn-group-vertical>.btn:not(:first-child):not(:last-child){border-radius:0}.btn-group-vertical>.btn:first-child:not(:last-child){border-top-right-radius:4px;border-bottom-right-radius:0;border-bottom-left-radius:0}.btn-group-vertical>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child){border-bottom-left-radius:4px;border-top-right-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:not(:first-child):not(:last-child)>.btn{border-radius:0}.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:first-child:not(:last-child)>.btn:last-child,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:first-child:not(:last-child)>.dropdown-toggle{border-bottom-right-radius:0;border-bottom-left-radius:0}.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:last-child:not(:first-child)>.btn:first-child{border-top-right-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.btn-group-justified{display:table;width:100%;table-layout:fixed;border-collapse:separate}.btn-group-justified>.btn,.btn-group-justified>.btn-group{float:none;display:table-cell;width:1%}.btn-group-justified>.btn-group .btn{width:100%}[data-toggle=buttons]>.btn>input[type=radio],[data-toggle=buttons]>.btn>input[type=checkbox]{display:none}.input-group{position:relative;display:table;border-collapse:separate}.input-group[class*=col-]{float:none;padding-left:0;padding-right:0}.input-group .form-control{position:relative;z-index:2;float:left;width:100%;margin-bottom:0}.input-group-lg>.form-control,.input-group-lg>.input-group-addon,.input-group-lg>.input-group-btn>.btn{height:46px;padding:10px 16px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.33;border-radius:6px}select.input-group-lg>.form-control,select.input-group-lg>.input-group-addon,select.input-group-lg>.input-group-btn>.btn{height:46px;line-height:46px}textarea.input-group-lg>.form-control,textarea.input-group-lg>.input-group-addon,textarea.input-group-lg>.input-group-btn>.btn,select[multiple].input-group-lg>.form-control,select[multiple].input-group-lg>.input-group-addon,select[multiple].input-group-lg>.input-group-btn>.btn{height:auto}.input-group-sm>.form-control,.input-group-sm>.input-group-addon,.input-group-sm>.input-group-btn>.btn{height:30px;padding:5px 10px;font-size:12px;line-height:1.5;border-radius:3px}select.input-group-sm>.form-control,select.input-group-sm>.input-group-addon,select.input-group-sm>.input-group-btn>.btn{height:30px;line-height:30px}textarea.input-group-sm>.form-control,textarea.input-group-sm>.input-group-addon,textarea.input-group-sm>.input-group-btn>.btn,select[multiple].input-group-sm>.form-control,select[multiple].input-group-sm>.input-group-addon,select[multiple].input-group-sm>.input-group-btn>.btn{height:auto}.input-group-addon,.input-group-btn,.input-group .form-control{display:table-cell}.input-group-addon:not(:first-child):not(:last-child),.input-group-btn:not(:first-child):not(:last-child),.input-group .form-control:not(:first-child):not(:last-child){border-radius:0}.input-group-addon,.input-group-btn{width:1%;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle}.input-group-addon{padding:6px 12px;font-size:14px;font-weight:400;line-height:1;color:#555;text-align:center;background-color:#eee;border:1px solid #ccc;border-radius:4px}.input-group-addon.input-sm{padding:5px 10px;font-size:12px;border-radius:3px}.input-group-addon.input-lg{padding:10px 16px;font-size:18px;border-radius:6px}.input-group-addon input[type=radio],.input-group-addon input[type=checkbox]{margin-top:0}.input-group .form-control:first-child,.input-group-addon:first-child,.input-group-btn:first-child>.btn,.input-group-btn:first-child>.btn-group>.btn,.input-group-btn:first-child>.dropdown-toggle,.input-group-btn:last-child>.btn:not(:last-child):not(.dropdown-toggle),.input-group-btn:last-child>.btn-group:not(:last-child)>.btn{border-bottom-right-radius:0;border-top-right-radius:0}.input-group-addon:first-child{border-right:0}.input-group .form-control:last-child,.input-group-addon:last-child,.input-group-btn:last-child>.btn,.input-group-btn:last-child>.btn-group>.btn,.input-group-btn:last-child>.dropdown-toggle,.input-group-btn:first-child>.btn:not(:first-child),.input-group-btn:first-child>.btn-group:not(:first-child)>.btn{border-bottom-left-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.input-group-addon:last-child{border-left:0}.input-group-btn{position:relative;font-size:0;white-space:nowrap}.input-group-btn>.btn{position:relative}.input-group-btn>.btn+.btn{margin-left:-1px}.input-group-btn>.btn:hover,.input-group-btn>.btn:focus,.input-group-btn>.btn:active{z-index:2}.input-group-btn:first-child>.btn,.input-group-btn:first-child>.btn-group{margin-right:-1px}.input-group-btn:last-child>.btn,.input-group-btn:last-child>.btn-group{margin-left:-1px}.nav{margin-bottom:0;padding-left:0;list-style:none}.nav>li{position:relative;display:block}.nav>li>a{position:relative;display:block;padding:10px 15px}.nav>li>a:hover,.nav>li>a:focus{text-decoration:none;background-color:#eee}.nav>li.disabled>a{color:#999}.nav>li.disabled>a:hover,.nav>li.disabled>a:focus{color:#999;text-decoration:none;background-color:transparent;cursor:not-allowed}.nav .open>a,.nav .open>a:hover,.nav .open>a:focus{background-color:#eee;border-color:#428bca}.nav .nav-divider{height:1px;margin:9px 0;overflow:hidden;background-color:#e5e5e5}.nav>li>a>img{max-width:none}.nav-tabs{border-bottom:1px solid #ddd}.nav-tabs>li{float:left;margin-bottom:-1px}.nav-tabs>li>a{margin-right:2px;line-height:1.42857143;border:1px solid transparent;border-radius:4px 4px 0 0}.nav-tabs>li>a:hover{border-color:#eee #eee #ddd}.nav-tabs>li.active>a,.nav-tabs>li.active>a:hover,.nav-tabs>li.active>a:focus{color:#555;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ddd;border-bottom-color:transparent;cursor:default}.nav-tabs.nav-justified{width:100%;border-bottom:0}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>li{float:none}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>li>a{text-align:center;margin-bottom:5px}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.dropdown .dropdown-menu{top:auto;left:auto}@media (min-width:768px){.nav-tabs.nav-justified>li{display:table-cell;width:1%}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>li>a{margin-bottom:0}}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>li>a{margin-right:0;border-radius:4px}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.active>a,.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.active>a:hover,.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.active>a:focus{border:1px solid #ddd}@media (min-width:768px){.nav-tabs.nav-justified>li>a{border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;border-radius:4px 4px 0 0}.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.active>a,.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.active>a:hover,.nav-tabs.nav-justified>.active>a:focus{border-bottom-color:#fff}}.nav-pills>li{float:left}.nav-pills>li>a{border-radius:4px}.nav-pills>li+li{margin-left:2px}.nav-pills>li.active>a,.nav-pills>li.active>a:hover,.nav-pills>li.active>a:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#428bca}.nav-stacked>li{float:none}.nav-stacked>li+li{margin-top:2px;margin-left:0}.nav-justified{width:100%}.nav-justified>li{float:none}.nav-justified>li>a{text-align:center;margin-bottom:5px}.nav-justified>.dropdown .dropdown-menu{top:auto;left:auto}@media (min-width:768px){.nav-justified>li{display:table-cell;width:1%}.nav-justified>li>a{margin-bottom:0}}.nav-tabs-justified{border-bottom:0}.nav-tabs-justified>li>a{margin-right:0;border-radius:4px}.nav-tabs-justified>.active>a,.nav-tabs-justified>.active>a:hover,.nav-tabs-justified>.active>a:focus{border:1px solid #ddd}@media (min-width:768px){.nav-tabs-justified>li>a{border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;border-radius:4px 4px 0 0}.nav-tabs-justified>.active>a,.nav-tabs-justified>.active>a:hover,.nav-tabs-justified>.active>a:focus{border-bottom-color:#fff}}.tab-content>.tab-pane{display:none}.tab-content>.active{display:block}.nav-tabs .dropdown-menu{margin-top:-1px;border-top-right-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.navbar{position:relative;min-height:50px;margin-bottom:20px;border:1px solid transparent}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar{border-radius:4px}}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-header{float:left}}.navbar-collapse{max-height:340px;overflow-x:visible;padding-right:15px;padding-left:15px;border-top:1px solid transparent;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.1);-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}.navbar-collapse.in{overflow-y:auto}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-collapse{width:auto;border-top:0;box-shadow:none}.navbar-collapse.collapse{display:block!important;height:auto!important;padding-bottom:0;overflow:visible!important}.navbar-collapse.in{overflow-y:visible}.navbar-fixed-top .navbar-collapse,.navbar-static-top .navbar-collapse,.navbar-fixed-bottom .navbar-collapse{padding-left:0;padding-right:0}}.container>.navbar-header,.container-fluid>.navbar-header,.container>.navbar-collapse,.container-fluid>.navbar-collapse{margin-right:-15px;margin-left:-15px}@media (min-width:768px){.container>.navbar-header,.container-fluid>.navbar-header,.container>.navbar-collapse,.container-fluid>.navbar-collapse{margin-right:0;margin-left:0}}.navbar-static-top{z-index:1000;border-width:0 0 1px}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-static-top{border-radius:0}}.navbar-fixed-top,.navbar-fixed-bottom{position:fixed;right:0;left:0;z-index:1030}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-fixed-top,.navbar-fixed-bottom{border-radius:0}}.navbar-fixed-top{top:0;border-width:0 0 1px}.navbar-fixed-bottom{bottom:0;margin-bottom:0;border-width:1px 0 0}.navbar-brand{float:left;padding:15px;font-size:18px;line-height:20px;height:50px}.navbar-brand:hover,.navbar-brand:focus{text-decoration:none}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar>.container .navbar-brand,.navbar>.container-fluid .navbar-brand{margin-left:-15px}}.navbar-toggle{position:relative;float:right;margin-right:15px;padding:9px 10px;margin-top:8px;margin-bottom:8px;background-color:transparent;background-image:none;border:1px solid transparent;border-radius:4px}.navbar-toggle:focus{outline:0}.navbar-toggle .icon-bar{display:block;width:22px;height:2px;border-radius:1px}.navbar-toggle .icon-bar+.icon-bar{margin-top:4px}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-toggle{display:none}}.navbar-nav{margin:7.5px -15px}.navbar-nav>li>a{padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;line-height:20px}@media (max-width:767px){.navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu{position:static;float:none;width:auto;margin-top:0;background-color:transparent;border:0;box-shadow:none}.navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a,.navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu .dropdown-header{padding:5px 15px 5px 25px}.navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a{line-height:20px}.navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a:hover,.navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a:focus{background-image:none}}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-nav{float:left;margin:0}.navbar-nav>li{float:left}.navbar-nav>li>a{padding-top:15px;padding-bottom:15px}.navbar-nav.navbar-right:last-child{margin-right:-15px}}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-left{float:left!important}.navbar-right{float:right!important}}.navbar-form{margin-left:-15px;margin-right:-15px;padding:10px 15px;border-top:1px solid transparent;border-bottom:1px solid transparent;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.1),0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.1);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.1),0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.1);margin-top:8px;margin-bottom:8px}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-form .form-group{display:inline-block;margin-bottom:0;vertical-align:middle}.navbar-form .form-control{display:inline-block;width:auto;vertical-align:middle}.navbar-form .input-group>.form-control{width:100%}.navbar-form .control-label{margin-bottom:0;vertical-align:middle}.navbar-form .radio,.navbar-form .checkbox{display:inline-block;margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;padding-left:0;vertical-align:middle}.navbar-form .radio input[type=radio],.navbar-form .checkbox input[type=checkbox]{float:none;margin-left:0}.navbar-form .has-feedback .form-control-feedback{top:0}}@media (max-width:767px){.navbar-form .form-group{margin-bottom:5px}}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-form{width:auto;border:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;-webkit-box-shadow:none;box-shadow:none}.navbar-form.navbar-right:last-child{margin-right:-15px}}.navbar-nav>li>.dropdown-menu{margin-top:0;border-top-right-radius:0;border-top-left-radius:0}.navbar-fixed-bottom .navbar-nav>li>.dropdown-menu{border-bottom-right-radius:0;border-bottom-left-radius:0}.navbar-btn{margin-top:8px;margin-bottom:8px}.navbar-btn.btn-sm{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px}.navbar-btn.btn-xs{margin-top:14px;margin-bottom:14px}.navbar-text{margin-top:15px;margin-bottom:15px}@media (min-width:768px){.navbar-text{float:left;margin-left:15px;margin-right:15px}.navbar-text.navbar-right:last-child{margin-right:0}}.navbar-default{background-color:#f8f8f8;border-color:#e7e7e7}.navbar-default .navbar-brand{color:#777}.navbar-default .navbar-brand:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-brand:focus{color:#5e5e5e;background-color:transparent}.navbar-default .navbar-text{color:#777}.navbar-default .navbar-nav>li>a{color:#777}.navbar-default .navbar-nav>li>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>li>a:focus{color:#333;background-color:transparent}.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.active>a,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.active>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.active>a:focus{color:#555;background-color:#e7e7e7}.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.disabled>a,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.disabled>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.disabled>a:focus{color:#ccc;background-color:transparent}.navbar-default .navbar-toggle{border-color:#ddd}.navbar-default .navbar-toggle:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-toggle:focus{background-color:#ddd}.navbar-default .navbar-toggle .icon-bar{background-color:#888}.navbar-default .navbar-collapse,.navbar-default .navbar-form{border-color:#e7e7e7}.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.open>a,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.open>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav>.open>a:focus{background-color:#e7e7e7;color:#555}@media (max-width:767px){.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a{color:#777}.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a:focus{color:#333;background-color:transparent}.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.active>a,.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.active>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.active>a:focus{color:#555;background-color:#e7e7e7}.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.disabled>a,.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:hover,.navbar-default .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:focus{color:#ccc;background-color:transparent}}.navbar-default .navbar-link{color:#777}.navbar-default .navbar-link:hover{color:#333}.navbar-inverse{background-color:#222;border-color:#080808}.navbar-inverse .navbar-brand{color:#999}.navbar-inverse .navbar-brand:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-brand:focus{color:#fff;background-color:transparent}.navbar-inverse .navbar-text{color:#999}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>li>a{color:#999}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>li>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>li>a:focus{color:#fff;background-color:transparent}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.active>a,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.active>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.active>a:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#080808}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.disabled>a,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.disabled>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.disabled>a:focus{color:#444;background-color:transparent}.navbar-inverse .navbar-toggle{border-color:#333}.navbar-inverse .navbar-toggle:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-toggle:focus{background-color:#333}.navbar-inverse .navbar-toggle .icon-bar{background-color:#fff}.navbar-inverse .navbar-collapse,.navbar-inverse .navbar-form{border-color:#101010}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.open>a,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.open>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav>.open>a:focus{background-color:#080808;color:#fff}@media (max-width:767px){.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.dropdown-header{border-color:#080808}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu .divider{background-color:#080808}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a{color:#999}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>li>a:focus{color:#fff;background-color:transparent}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.active>a,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.active>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.active>a:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#080808}.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.disabled>a,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:hover,.navbar-inverse .navbar-nav .open .dropdown-menu>.disabled>a:focus{color:#444;background-color:transparent}}.navbar-inverse .navbar-link{color:#999}.navbar-inverse .navbar-link:hover{color:#fff}.breadcrumb{padding:8px 15px;margin-bottom:20px;list-style:none;background-color:#f5f5f5;border-radius:4px}.breadcrumb>li{display:inline-block}.breadcrumb>li+li:before{content:"/\00a0";padding:0 5px;color:#ccc}.breadcrumb>.active{color:#999}.pagination{display:inline-block;padding-left:0;margin:20px 0;border-radius:4px}.pagination>li{display:inline}.pagination>li>a,.pagination>li>span{position:relative;float:left;padding:6px 12px;line-height:1.42857143;text-decoration:none;color:#428bca;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ddd;margin-left:-1px}.pagination>li:first-child>a,.pagination>li:first-child>span{margin-left:0;border-bottom-left-radius:4px;border-top-left-radius:4px}.pagination>li:last-child>a,.pagination>li:last-child>span{border-bottom-right-radius:4px;border-top-right-radius:4px}.pagination>li>a:hover,.pagination>li>span:hover,.pagination>li>a:focus,.pagination>li>span:focus{color:#2a6496;background-color:#eee;border-color:#ddd}.pagination>.active>a,.pagination>.active>span,.pagination>.active>a:hover,.pagination>.active>span:hover,.pagination>.active>a:focus,.pagination>.active>span:focus{z-index:2;color:#fff;background-color:#428bca;border-color:#428bca;cursor:default}.pagination>.disabled>span,.pagination>.disabled>span:hover,.pagination>.disabled>span:focus,.pagination>.disabled>a,.pagination>.disabled>a:hover,.pagination>.disabled>a:focus{color:#999;background-color:#fff;border-color:#ddd;cursor:not-allowed}.pagination-lg>li>a,.pagination-lg>li>span{padding:10px 16px;font-size:18px}.pagination-lg>li:first-child>a,.pagination-lg>li:first-child>span{border-bottom-left-radius:6px;border-top-left-radius:6px}.pagination-lg>li:last-child>a,.pagination-lg>li:last-child>span{border-bottom-right-radius:6px;border-top-right-radius:6px}.pagination-sm>li>a,.pagination-sm>li>span{padding:5px 10px;font-size:12px}.pagination-sm>li:first-child>a,.pagination-sm>li:first-child>span{border-bottom-left-radius:3px;border-top-left-radius:3px}.pagination-sm>li:last-child>a,.pagination-sm>li:last-child>span{border-bottom-right-radius:3px;border-top-right-radius:3px}.pager{padding-left:0;margin:20px 0;list-style:none;text-align:center}.pager li{display:inline}.pager li>a,.pager li>span{display:inline-block;padding:5px 14px;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ddd;border-radius:15px}.pager li>a:hover,.pager li>a:focus{text-decoration:none;background-color:#eee}.pager .next>a,.pager .next>span{float:right}.pager .previous>a,.pager .previous>span{float:left}.pager .disabled>a,.pager .disabled>a:hover,.pager .disabled>a:focus,.pager .disabled>span{color:#999;background-color:#fff;cursor:not-allowed}.label{display:inline;padding:.2em .6em .3em;font-size:75%;font-weight:700;line-height:1;color:#fff;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:baseline;border-radius:.25em}.label[href]:hover,.label[href]:focus{color:#fff;text-decoration:none;cursor:pointer}.label:empty{display:none}.btn .label{position:relative;top:-1px}.label-default{background-color:#999}.label-default[href]:hover,.label-default[href]:focus{background-color:gray}.label-primary{background-color:#428bca}.label-primary[href]:hover,.label-primary[href]:focus{background-color:#3071a9}.label-success{background-color:#5cb85c}.label-success[href]:hover,.label-success[href]:focus{background-color:#449d44}.label-info{background-color:#5bc0de}.label-info[href]:hover,.label-info[href]:focus{background-color:#31b0d5}.label-warning{background-color:#f0ad4e}.label-warning[href]:hover,.label-warning[href]:focus{background-color:#ec971f}.label-danger{background-color:#d9534f}.label-danger[href]:hover,.label-danger[href]:focus{background-color:#c9302c}.badge{display:inline-block;min-width:10px;padding:3px 7px;font-size:12px;font-weight:700;color:#fff;line-height:1;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:nowrap;text-align:center;background-color:#999;border-radius:10px}.badge:empty{display:none}.btn .badge{position:relative;top:-1px}.btn-xs .badge{top:0;padding:1px 5px}a.badge:hover,a.badge:focus{color:#fff;text-decoration:none;cursor:pointer}a.list-group-item.active>.badge,.nav-pills>.active>a>.badge{color:#428bca;background-color:#fff}.nav-pills>li>a>.badge{margin-left:3px}.jumbotron{padding:30px;margin-bottom:30px;color:inherit;background-color:#eee}.jumbotron h1,.jumbotron .h1{color:inherit}.jumbotron p{margin-bottom:15px;font-size:21px;font-weight:200}.container .jumbotron{border-radius:6px}.jumbotron .container{max-width:100%}@media screen and (min-width:768px){.jumbotron{padding-top:48px;padding-bottom:48px}.container .jumbotron{padding-left:60px;padding-right:60px}.jumbotron h1,.jumbotron .h1{font-size:63px}}.thumbnail{display:block;padding:4px;margin-bottom:20px;line-height:1.42857143;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ddd;border-radius:4px;-webkit-transition:all .2s ease-in-out;transition:all .2s ease-in-out}.thumbnail>img,.thumbnail a>img{margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto}a.thumbnail:hover,a.thumbnail:focus,a.thumbnail.active{border-color:#428bca}.thumbnail .caption{padding:9px;color:#333}.alert{padding:15px;margin-bottom:20px;border:1px solid transparent;border-radius:4px}.alert h4{margin-top:0;color:inherit}.alert .alert-link{font-weight:700}.alert>p,.alert>ul{margin-bottom:0}.alert>p+p{margin-top:5px}.alert-dismissable{padding-right:35px}.alert-dismissable .close{position:relative;top:-2px;right:-21px;color:inherit}.alert-success{background-color:#dff0d8;border-color:#d6e9c6;color:#3c763d}.alert-success hr{border-top-color:#c9e2b3}.alert-success .alert-link{color:#2b542c}.alert-info{background-color:#d9edf7;border-color:#bce8f1;color:#31708f}.alert-info hr{border-top-color:#a6e1ec}.alert-info .alert-link{color:#245269}.alert-warning{background-color:#fcf8e3;border-color:#faebcc;color:#8a6d3b}.alert-warning hr{border-top-color:#f7e1b5}.alert-warning .alert-link{color:#66512c}.alert-danger{background-color:#f2dede;border-color:#ebccd1;color:#a94442}.alert-danger hr{border-top-color:#e4b9c0}.alert-danger .alert-link{color:#843534}@-webkit-keyframes progress-bar-stripes{from{background-position:40px 0}to{background-position:0 0}}@keyframes progress-bar-stripes{from{background-position:40px 0}to{background-position:0 0}}.progress{overflow:hidden;height:20px;margin-bottom:20px;background-color:#f5f5f5;border-radius:4px;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.1);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.1)}.progress-bar{float:left;width:0;height:100%;font-size:12px;line-height:20px;color:#fff;text-align:center;background-color:#428bca;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 -1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.15);box-shadow:inset 0 -1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.15);-webkit-transition:width .6s ease;transition:width .6s ease}.progress-striped .progress-bar{background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent);background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent);background-size:40px 40px}.progress.active .progress-bar{-webkit-animation:progress-bar-stripes 2s linear infinite;animation:progress-bar-stripes 2s linear infinite}.progress-bar-success{background-color:#5cb85c}.progress-striped .progress-bar-success{background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent);background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent)}.progress-bar-info{background-color:#5bc0de}.progress-striped .progress-bar-info{background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent);background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent)}.progress-bar-warning{background-color:#f0ad4e}.progress-striped .progress-bar-warning{background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent);background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent)}.progress-bar-danger{background-color:#d9534f}.progress-striped .progress-bar-danger{background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent);background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 25%,transparent 25%,transparent 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 50%,rgba(255,255,255,.15) 75%,transparent 75%,transparent)}.media,.media-body{overflow:hidden;zoom:1}.media,.media .media{margin-top:15px}.media:first-child{margin-top:0}.media-object{display:block}.media-heading{margin:0 0 5px}.media>.pull-left{margin-right:10px}.media>.pull-right{margin-left:10px}.media-list{padding-left:0;list-style:none}.list-group{margin-bottom:20px;padding-left:0}.list-group-item{position:relative;display:block;padding:10px 15px;margin-bottom:-1px;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #ddd}.list-group-item:first-child{border-top-right-radius:4px;border-top-left-radius:4px}.list-group-item:last-child{margin-bottom:0;border-bottom-right-radius:4px;border-bottom-left-radius:4px}.list-group-item>.badge{float:right}.list-group-item>.badge+.badge{margin-right:5px}a.list-group-item{color:#555}a.list-group-item .list-group-item-heading{color:#333}a.list-group-item:hover,a.list-group-item:focus{text-decoration:none;background-color:#f5f5f5}a.list-group-item.active,a.list-group-item.active:hover,a.list-group-item.active:focus{z-index:2;color:#fff;background-color:#428bca;border-color:#428bca}a.list-group-item.active .list-group-item-heading,a.list-group-item.active:hover .list-group-item-heading,a.list-group-item.active:focus .list-group-item-heading{color:inherit}a.list-group-item.active .list-group-item-text,a.list-group-item.active:hover .list-group-item-text,a.list-group-item.active:focus .list-group-item-text{color:#e1edf7}.list-group-item-success{color:#3c763d;background-color:#dff0d8}a.list-group-item-success{color:#3c763d}a.list-group-item-success .list-group-item-heading{color:inherit}a.list-group-item-success:hover,a.list-group-item-success:focus{color:#3c763d;background-color:#d0e9c6}a.list-group-item-success.active,a.list-group-item-success.active:hover,a.list-group-item-success.active:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#3c763d;border-color:#3c763d}.list-group-item-info{color:#31708f;background-color:#d9edf7}a.list-group-item-info{color:#31708f}a.list-group-item-info .list-group-item-heading{color:inherit}a.list-group-item-info:hover,a.list-group-item-info:focus{color:#31708f;background-color:#c4e3f3}a.list-group-item-info.active,a.list-group-item-info.active:hover,a.list-group-item-info.active:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#31708f;border-color:#31708f}.list-group-item-warning{color:#8a6d3b;background-color:#fcf8e3}a.list-group-item-warning{color:#8a6d3b}a.list-group-item-warning .list-group-item-heading{color:inherit}a.list-group-item-warning:hover,a.list-group-item-warning:focus{color:#8a6d3b;background-color:#faf2cc}a.list-group-item-warning.active,a.list-group-item-warning.active:hover,a.list-group-item-warning.active:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#8a6d3b;border-color:#8a6d3b}.list-group-item-danger{color:#a94442;background-color:#f2dede}a.list-group-item-danger{color:#a94442}a.list-group-item-danger .list-group-item-heading{color:inherit}a.list-group-item-danger:hover,a.list-group-item-danger:focus{color:#a94442;background-color:#ebcccc}a.list-group-item-danger.active,a.list-group-item-danger.active:hover,a.list-group-item-danger.active:focus{color:#fff;background-color:#a94442;border-color:#a94442}.list-group-item-heading{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:5px}.list-group-item-text{margin-bottom:0;line-height:1.3}.panel{margin-bottom:20px;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid transparent;border-radius:4px;-webkit-box-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.05);box-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.05)}.panel-body{padding:15px}.panel-heading{padding:10px 15px;border-bottom:1px solid transparent;border-top-right-radius:3px;border-top-left-radius:3px}.panel-heading>.dropdown .dropdown-toggle{color:inherit}.panel-title{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;font-size:16px;color:inherit}.panel-title>a{color:inherit}.panel-footer{padding:10px 15px;background-color:#f5f5f5;border-top:1px solid #ddd;border-bottom-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-left-radius:3px}.panel>.list-group{margin-bottom:0}.panel>.list-group .list-group-item{border-width:1px 0;border-radius:0}.panel>.list-group:first-child .list-group-item:first-child{border-top:0;border-top-right-radius:3px;border-top-left-radius:3px}.panel>.list-group:last-child .list-group-item:last-child{border-bottom:0;border-bottom-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-left-radius:3px}.panel-heading+.list-group .list-group-item:first-child{border-top-width:0}.panel>.table,.panel>.table-responsive>.table{margin-bottom:0}.panel>.table:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child{border-top-right-radius:3px;border-top-left-radius:3px}.panel>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child td:first-child,.panel>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child td:first-child,.panel>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child th:first-child,.panel>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child th:first-child{border-top-left-radius:3px}.panel>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child td:last-child,.panel>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child td:last-child,.panel>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>thead:first-child>tr:first-child th:last-child,.panel>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:first-child>.table:first-child>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child th:last-child{border-top-right-radius:3px}.panel>.table:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child{border-bottom-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-left-radius:3px}.panel>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child td:first-child,.panel>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child td:first-child,.panel>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child th:first-child,.panel>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child th:first-child{border-bottom-left-radius:3px}.panel>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child td:last-child,.panel>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child td:last-child,.panel>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tbody:last-child>tr:last-child th:last-child,.panel>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive:last-child>.table:last-child>tfoot:last-child>tr:last-child th:last-child{border-bottom-right-radius:3px}.panel>.panel-body+.table,.panel>.panel-body+.table-responsive{border-top:1px solid #ddd}.panel>.table>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child th,.panel>.table>tbody:first-child>tr:first-child td{border-top:0}.panel>.table-bordered,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered{border:0}.panel>.table-bordered>thead>tr>th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>th:first-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th:first-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th:first-child,.panel>.table-bordered>thead>tr>td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>td:first-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td:first-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td:first-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td:first-child{border-left:0}.panel>.table-bordered>thead>tr>th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>th:last-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>th:last-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>th:last-child,.panel>.table-bordered>thead>tr>td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr>td:last-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr>td:last-child,.panel>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td:last-child,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr>td:last-child{border-right:0}.panel>.table-bordered>thead>tr:first-child>td,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr:first-child>td,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:first-child>td,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:first-child>td,.panel>.table-bordered>thead>tr:first-child>th,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>thead>tr:first-child>th,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:first-child>th,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:first-child>th{border-bottom:0}.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:last-child>td,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:last-child>td,.panel>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr:last-child>td,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr:last-child>td,.panel>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:last-child>th,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tbody>tr:last-child>th,.panel>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr:last-child>th,.panel>.table-responsive>.table-bordered>tfoot>tr:last-child>th{border-bottom:0}.panel>.table-responsive{border:0;margin-bottom:0}.panel-group{margin-bottom:20px}.panel-group .panel{margin-bottom:0;border-radius:4px;overflow:hidden}.panel-group .panel+.panel{margin-top:5px}.panel-group .panel-heading{border-bottom:0}.panel-group .panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top:1px solid #ddd}.panel-group .panel-footer{border-top:0}.panel-group .panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom:1px solid #ddd}.panel-default{border-color:#ddd}.panel-default>.panel-heading{color:#333;background-color:#f5f5f5;border-color:#ddd}.panel-default>.panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top-color:#ddd}.panel-default>.panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom-color:#ddd}.panel-primary{border-color:#428bca}.panel-primary>.panel-heading{color:#fff;background-color:#428bca;border-color:#428bca}.panel-primary>.panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top-color:#428bca}.panel-primary>.panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom-color:#428bca}.panel-success{border-color:#d6e9c6}.panel-success>.panel-heading{color:#3c763d;background-color:#dff0d8;border-color:#d6e9c6}.panel-success>.panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top-color:#d6e9c6}.panel-success>.panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom-color:#d6e9c6}.panel-info{border-color:#bce8f1}.panel-info>.panel-heading{color:#31708f;background-color:#d9edf7;border-color:#bce8f1}.panel-info>.panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top-color:#bce8f1}.panel-info>.panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom-color:#bce8f1}.panel-warning{border-color:#faebcc}.panel-warning>.panel-heading{color:#8a6d3b;background-color:#fcf8e3;border-color:#faebcc}.panel-warning>.panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top-color:#faebcc}.panel-warning>.panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom-color:#faebcc}.panel-danger{border-color:#ebccd1}.panel-danger>.panel-heading{color:#a94442;background-color:#f2dede;border-color:#ebccd1}.panel-danger>.panel-heading+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-top-color:#ebccd1}.panel-danger>.panel-footer+.panel-collapse .panel-body{border-bottom-color:#ebccd1}.well{min-height:20px;padding:19px;margin-bottom:20px;background-color:#f5f5f5;border:1px solid #e3e3e3;border-radius:4px;-webkit-box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.05);box-shadow:inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,.05)}.well blockquote{border-color:#ddd;border-color:rgba(0,0,0,.15)}.well-lg{padding:24px;border-radius:6px}.well-sm{padding:9px;border-radius:3px}.close{float:right;font-size:21px;font-weight:700;line-height:1;color:#000;text-shadow:0 1px 0 #fff;opacity:.2;filter:alpha(opacity=20)}.close:hover,.close:focus{color:#000;text-decoration:none;cursor:pointer;opacity:.5;filter:alpha(opacity=50)}button.close{padding:0;cursor:pointer;background:0 0;border:0;-webkit-appearance:none}.modal-open{overflow:hidden}.modal{display:none;overflow:auto;overflow-y:scroll;position:fixed;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;left:0;z-index:1050;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch;outline:0}.modal.fade .modal-dialog{-webkit-transform:translate(0,-25%);-ms-transform:translate(0,-25%);transform:translate(0,-25%);-webkit-transition:-webkit-transform .3s ease-out;-moz-transition:-moz-transform .3s ease-out;-o-transition:-o-transform .3s ease-out;transition:transform .3s ease-out}.modal.in .modal-dialog{-webkit-transform:translate(0,0);-ms-transform:translate(0,0);transform:translate(0,0)}.modal-dialog{position:relative;width:auto;margin:10px}.modal-content{position:relative;background-color:#fff;border:1px solid #999;border:1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.2);border-radius:6px;-webkit-box-shadow:0 3px 9px rgba(0,0,0,.5);box-shadow:0 3px 9px rgba(0,0,0,.5);background-clip:padding-box;outline:0}.modal-backdrop{position:fixed;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;left:0;z-index:1040;background-color:#000}.modal-backdrop.fade{opacity:0;filter:alpha(opacity=0)}.modal-backdrop.in{opacity:.5;filter:alpha(opacity=50)}.modal-header{padding:15px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e5e5;min-height:16.42857143px}.modal-header .close{margin-top:-2px}.modal-title{margin:0;line-height:1.42857143}.modal-body{position:relative;padding:20px}.modal-footer{margin-top:15px;padding:19px 20px 20px;text-align:right;border-top:1px solid #e5e5e5}.modal-footer .btn+.btn{margin-left:5px;margin-bottom:0}.modal-footer .btn-group .btn+.btn{margin-left:-1px}.modal-footer .btn-block+.btn-block{margin-left:0}@media (min-width:768px){.modal-dialog{width:600px;margin:30px auto}.modal-content{-webkit-box-shadow:0 5px 15px rgba(0,0,0,.5);box-shadow:0 5px 15px rgba(0,0,0,.5)}.modal-sm{width:300px}}@media (min-width:992px){.modal-lg{width:900px}}.tooltip{position:absolute;z-index:1030;display:block;visibility:visible;font-size:12px;line-height:1.4;opacity:0;filter:alpha(opacity=0)}.tooltip.in{opacity:.9;filter:alpha(opacity=90)}.tooltip.top{margin-top:-3px;padding:5px 0}.tooltip.right{margin-left:3px;padding:0 5px}.tooltip.bottom{margin-top:3px;padding:5px 0}.tooltip.left{margin-left:-3px;padding:0 5px}.tooltip-inner{max-width:200px;padding:3px 8px;color:#fff;text-align:center;text-decoration:none;background-color:#000;border-radius:4px}.tooltip-arrow{position:absolute;width:0;height:0;border-color:transparent;border-style:solid}.tooltip.top .tooltip-arrow{bottom:0;left:50%;margin-left:-5px;border-width:5px 5px 0;border-top-color:#000}.tooltip.top-left .tooltip-arrow{bottom:0;left:5px;border-width:5px 5px 0;border-top-color:#000}.tooltip.top-right .tooltip-arrow{bottom:0;right:5px;border-width:5px 5px 0;border-top-color:#000}.tooltip.right .tooltip-arrow{top:50%;left:0;margin-top:-5px;border-width:5px 5px 5px 0;border-right-color:#000}.tooltip.left .tooltip-arrow{top:50%;right:0;margin-top:-5px;border-width:5px 0 5px 5px;border-left-color:#000}.tooltip.bottom .tooltip-arrow{top:0;left:50%;margin-left:-5px;border-width:0 5px 5px;border-bottom-color:#000}.tooltip.bottom-left .tooltip-arrow{top:0;left:5px;border-width:0 5px 5px;border-bottom-color:#000}.tooltip.bottom-right .tooltip-arrow{top:0;right:5px;border-width:0 5px 5px;border-bottom-color:#000}.popover{position:absolute;top:0;left:0;z-index:1010;display:none;max-width:276px;padding:1px;text-align:left;background-color:#fff;background-clip:padding-box;border:1px solid #ccc;border:1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.2);border-radius:6px;-webkit-box-shadow:0 5px 10px rgba(0,0,0,.2);box-shadow:0 5px 10px rgba(0,0,0,.2);white-space:normal}.popover.top{margin-top:-10px}.popover.right{margin-left:10px}.popover.bottom{margin-top:10px}.popover.left{margin-left:-10px}.popover-title{margin:0;padding:8px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:400;line-height:18px;background-color:#f7f7f7;border-bottom:1px solid #ebebeb;border-radius:5px 5px 0 0}.popover-content{padding:9px 14px}.popover>.arrow,.popover>.arrow:after{position:absolute;display:block;width:0;height:0;border-color:transparent;border-style:solid}.popover>.arrow{border-width:11px}.popover>.arrow:after{border-width:10px;content:""}.popover.top>.arrow{left:50%;margin-left:-11px;border-bottom-width:0;border-top-color:#999;border-top-color:rgba(0,0,0,.25);bottom:-11px}.popover.top>.arrow:after{content:" ";bottom:1px;margin-left:-10px;border-bottom-width:0;border-top-color:#fff}.popover.right>.arrow{top:50%;left:-11px;margin-top:-11px;border-left-width:0;border-right-color:#999;border-right-color:rgba(0,0,0,.25)}.popover.right>.arrow:after{content:" ";left:1px;bottom:-10px;border-left-width:0;border-right-color:#fff}.popover.bottom>.arrow{left:50%;margin-left:-11px;border-top-width:0;border-bottom-color:#999;border-bottom-color:rgba(0,0,0,.25);top:-11px}.popover.bottom>.arrow:after{content:" ";top:1px;margin-left:-10px;border-top-width:0;border-bottom-color:#fff}.popover.left>.arrow{top:50%;right:-11px;margin-top:-11px;border-right-width:0;border-left-color:#999;border-left-color:rgba(0,0,0,.25)}.popover.left>.arrow:after{content:" ";right:1px;border-right-width:0;border-left-color:#fff;bottom:-10px}.carousel{position:relative}.carousel-inner{position:relative;overflow:hidden;width:100%}.carousel-inner>.item{display:none;position:relative;-webkit-transition:.6s ease-in-out left;transition:.6s ease-in-out left}.carousel-inner>.item>img,.carousel-inner>.item>a>img{line-height:1}.carousel-inner>.active,.carousel-inner>.next,.carousel-inner>.prev{display:block}.carousel-inner>.active{left:0}.carousel-inner>.next,.carousel-inner>.prev{position:absolute;top:0;width:100%}.carousel-inner>.next{left:100%}.carousel-inner>.prev{left:-100%}.carousel-inner>.next.left,.carousel-inner>.prev.right{left:0}.carousel-inner>.active.left{left:-100%}.carousel-inner>.active.right{left:100%}.carousel-control{position:absolute;top:0;left:0;bottom:0;width:15%;opacity:.5;filter:alpha(opacity=50);font-size:20px;color:#fff;text-align:center;text-shadow:0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.6)}.carousel-control.left{background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,color-stop(rgba(0,0,0,.5) 0),color-stop(rgba(0,0,0,.0001) 100%));background-image:linear-gradient(to right,rgba(0,0,0,.5) 0,rgba(0,0,0,.0001) 100%);background-repeat:repeat-x;filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr='#80000000', endColorstr='#00000000', GradientType=1)}.carousel-control.right{left:auto;right:0;background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,color-stop(rgba(0,0,0,.0001) 0),color-stop(rgba(0,0,0,.5) 100%));background-image:linear-gradient(to right,rgba(0,0,0,.0001) 0,rgba(0,0,0,.5) 100%);background-repeat:repeat-x;filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr='#00000000', endColorstr='#80000000', GradientType=1)}.carousel-control:hover,.carousel-control:focus{outline:0;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;opacity:.9;filter:alpha(opacity=90)}.carousel-control .icon-prev,.carousel-control .icon-next,.carousel-control .glyphicon-chevron-left,.carousel-control .glyphicon-chevron-right{position:absolute;top:50%;z-index:5;display:inline-block}.carousel-control .icon-prev,.carousel-control .glyphicon-chevron-left{left:50%}.carousel-control .icon-next,.carousel-control .glyphicon-chevron-right{right:50%}.carousel-control .icon-prev,.carousel-control .icon-next{width:20px;height:20px;margin-top:-10px;margin-left:-10px;font-family:serif}.carousel-control .icon-prev:before{content:'\2039'}.carousel-control .icon-next:before{content:'\203a'}.carousel-indicators{position:absolute;bottom:10px;left:50%;z-index:15;width:60%;margin-left:-30%;padding-left:0;list-style:none;text-align:center}.carousel-indicators li{display:inline-block;width:10px;height:10px;margin:1px;text-indent:-999px;border:1px solid #fff;border-radius:10px;cursor:pointer;background-color:#000 \9;background-color:rgba(0,0,0,0)}.carousel-indicators .active{margin:0;width:12px;height:12px;background-color:#fff}.carousel-caption{position:absolute;left:15%;right:15%;bottom:20px;z-index:10;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px;color:#fff;text-align:center;text-shadow:0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.6)}.carousel-caption .btn{text-shadow:none}@media screen and (min-width:768px){.carousel-control .glyphicon-chevron-left,.carousel-control .glyphicon-chevron-right,.carousel-control .icon-prev,.carousel-control .icon-next{width:30px;height:30px;margin-top:-15px;margin-left:-15px;font-size:30px}.carousel-caption{left:20%;right:20%;padding-bottom:30px}.carousel-indicators{bottom:20px}}.clearfix:before,.clearfix:after,.container:before,.container:after,.container-fluid:before,.container-fluid:after,.row:before,.row:after,.form-horizontal .form-group:before,.form-horizontal .form-group:after,.btn-toolbar:before,.btn-toolbar:after,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:before,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:after,.nav:before,.nav:after,.navbar:before,.navbar:after,.navbar-header:before,.navbar-header:after,.navbar-collapse:before,.navbar-collapse:after,.pager:before,.pager:after,.panel-body:before,.panel-body:after,.modal-footer:before,.modal-footer:after{content:" ";display:table}.clearfix:after,.container:after,.container-fluid:after,.row:after,.form-horizontal .form-group:after,.btn-toolbar:after,.btn-group-vertical>.btn-group:after,.nav:after,.navbar:after,.navbar-header:after,.navbar-collapse:after,.pager:after,.panel-body:after,.modal-footer:after{clear:both}.center-block{display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto}.pull-right{float:right!important}.pull-left{float:left!important}.hide{display:none!important}.show{display:block!important}.invisible{visibility:hidden}.text-hide{font:0/0 a;color:transparent;text-shadow:none;background-color:transparent;border:0}.hidden{display:none!important;visibility:hidden!important}.affix{position:fixed}@-ms-viewport{width:device-width}.visible-xs,.visible-sm,.visible-md,.visible-lg{display:none!important}@media (max-width:767px){.visible-xs{display:block!important}table.visible-xs{display:table}tr.visible-xs{display:table-row!important}th.visible-xs,td.visible-xs{display:table-cell!important}}@media (min-width:768px) and (max-width:991px){.visible-sm{display:block!important}table.visible-sm{display:table}tr.visible-sm{display:table-row!important}th.visible-sm,td.visible-sm{display:table-cell!important}}@media (min-width:992px) and (max-width:1199px){.visible-md{display:block!important}table.visible-md{display:table}tr.visible-md{display:table-row!important}th.visible-md,td.visible-md{display:table-cell!important}}@media (min-width:1200px){.visible-lg{display:block!important}table.visible-lg{display:table}tr.visible-lg{display:table-row!important}th.visible-lg,td.visible-lg{display:table-cell!important}}@media (max-width:767px){.hidden-xs{display:none!important}}@media (min-width:768px) and (max-width:991px){.hidden-sm{display:none!important}}@media (min-width:992px) and (max-width:1199px){.hidden-md{display:none!important}}@media (min-width:1200px){.hidden-lg{display:none!important}}.visible-print{display:none!important}@media print{.visible-print{display:block!important}table.visible-print{display:table}tr.visible-print{display:table-row!important}th.visible-print,td.visible-print{display:table-cell!important}}@media print{.hidden-print{display:none!important}} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/css/bubbles.css b/css/bubbles.css new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e50bce8 --- /dev/null +++ b/css/bubbles.css @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +body{ + margin: 20px; +} + +svg{ + width: 800px; + height: 400px; + margin: 20px; +} + +g#axes line { + stroke-width:1; + stroke:#BBB; + stroke-dasharray: 1,3; +} + +g#bubbles circle { + opacity: 1; + stroke-width:1; + stroke:black; +} + +g#bubbles circle:hover { + stroke-width:3; +} + +g#bubbles text { + text-anchor:middle; + alignment-baseline:middle; + opacity:0; + pointer-events:all; + transition:1s; +} +g#bubbles text:hover { + opacity:1; +} + diff --git a/css/tipsy.css b/css/tipsy.css new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c499da7 --- /dev/null +++ b/css/tipsy.css @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +.tipsy { font-size: 10px; position: absolute; padding: 5px; z-index: 100000; min-width: 200px; } + .tipsy-inner { background-color: #000; color: #FFF; padding: 5px 8px 4px 8px; text-align: center; } + + /* Rounded corners */ + .tipsy-inner { border-radius: 3px; -moz-border-radius: 3px; -webkit-border-radius: 3px; } + + /* Uncomment for shadow */ + /*.tipsy-inner { box-shadow: 0 0 5px #000000; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px #000000; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 5px #000000; }*/ + + .tipsy-arrow { position: absolute; width: 0; height: 0; line-height: 0; border: 5px dashed #000; } + + /* Rules to colour arrows */ + .tipsy-arrow-n { border-bottom-color: #000; } + .tipsy-arrow-s { border-top-color: #000; } + .tipsy-arrow-e { border-left-color: #000; } + .tipsy-arrow-w { border-right-color: #000; } + +.tipsy-n .tipsy-arrow { top: 0px; left: 50%; margin-left: -5px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-top: none; border-left-color: transparent; border-right-color: transparent; } +.tipsy-nw .tipsy-arrow { top: 0; left: 10px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-top: none; border-left-color: transparent; border-right-color: transparent;} +.tipsy-ne .tipsy-arrow { top: 0; right: 10px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-top: none; border-left-color: transparent; border-right-color: transparent;} +.tipsy-s .tipsy-arrow { bottom: 0; left: 50%; margin-left: -5px; border-top-style: solid; border-bottom: none; border-left-color: transparent; border-right-color: transparent; } +.tipsy-sw .tipsy-arrow { bottom: 0; left: 10px; border-top-style: solid; border-bottom: none; border-left-color: transparent; border-right-color: transparent; } +.tipsy-se .tipsy-arrow { bottom: 0; right: 10px; border-top-style: solid; border-bottom: none; border-left-color: transparent; border-right-color: transparent; } +.tipsy-e .tipsy-arrow { right: 0; top: 50%; margin-top: -5px; border-left-style: solid; border-right: none; border-top-color: transparent; border-bottom-color: transparent; } +.tipsy-w .tipsy-arrow { left: 0; top: 50%; margin-top: -5px; border-right-style: solid; border-left: none; border-top-color: transparent; border-bottom-color: transparent; } + +.tipsy .tipsyinfo{ + text-align:left; + font: 10px sans-serif; + overflow:auto; + width: 100%; +} + +.tipsy .tipsyinfo .tipsyrow{ + padding: 3px; + border-top: 1px dotted #333; + overflow:auto; +} + +.tipsy .tipsyinfo .noborder{ + border: 0px; +} + +.tipsy .tipsyinfo .tipsylabel{ + width: 65px; + margin-right: 20px; + color: #999; + float: left; + text-align:left; +} + +.tipsy .tipsyinfo .value{ + font-weight: bold; + float: left; + width: auto; +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/.~lock.countries.csv# b/data/.~lock.countries.csv# new file mode 100644 index 0000000..13733de --- /dev/null +++ b/data/.~lock.countries.csv# @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Kris Peeters,krispeeters,Kriss-MacBook-Pro.local,27.05.2014 11:58,file:///Users/krispeeters/Library/Application%20Support/OpenOffice/4; \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/.~lock.gitr2014.csv# b/data/.~lock.gitr2014.csv# new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2cf0221 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/.~lock.gitr2014.csv# @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Kris Peeters,krispeeters,Kriss-MacBook-Pro.local,24.05.2014 14:30,file:///Users/krispeeters/Library/Application%20Support/OpenOffice/4; \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/.~lock.gitr2014_nri.csv# b/data/.~lock.gitr2014_nri.csv# new file mode 100644 index 0000000..75580b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/.~lock.gitr2014_nri.csv# @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Kris Peeters,krispeeters,Kriss-MacBook-Pro.local,28.05.2014 17:53,file:///Users/krispeeters/Library/Application%20Support/OpenOffice/4; \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/companies.tsv b/data/companies.tsv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a39ca59 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/companies.tsv @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@ +cx cy capitalization earnings taxes x y sector name alias symbol +321 -54.1 73048 33992 9379 315 -0.7 Industrials 3M Company MMM +201.4 13.6 57408 34694 6317 209.4 0 Health care Abbott Laboratories ABT +431.4 -14.3 3867 2551 960 430 -10.8 Retailers Abercrombie & Fitch Co. ANF +301.3 -70.9 49763 18735 5025 305.5 8.1 Information technology Accenture plc ACN +189.9 66.7 30619 16453 2834 197.7 -1.4 Insurance ACE Limited ACE +692.1 -14.2 12565 1897 1218 690 -3.9 Pharma Actavis, Inc. ACT +197.1 -57.9 21980 5824 1035 210.1 -20.5 Information technology Adobe Systems Inc. ADBE +740.3 -32 1850 -4934 81 745.5 -0.4 Information technology Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. AMD +351.9 -28.9 17797 15139 4637 351.8 0.3 Health care Aetna Inc. AET +302.8 69 23183 17461 4441 292.7 -5.4 Insurance AFLAC Inc. AFL +142.9 11.4 14463 4259 565 153.5 -6.6 Health care Agilent Technologies Inc. A +118.5 -22.5 5019 2272 228 116.1 0 Utilities AGL Resources Inc. GAS +176.3 50.9 17783 7775 1217 180 0 Materials Air Products & Chemicals Inc. APD +184.2 52.8 7355 2270 374 188.9 -1.4 Materials Airgas, Inc. ARG +146.3 -7.7 6155 1531 203 147.2 11.4 Information technology Akamai Technologies, Inc. AKAM +535.5 7.4 8972 6031 2812 536.3 0 Materials Alcoa Inc. AA +55.5 -4.4 19166 767 41 61.2 0 Pharma Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ALXN +201.5 30.2 3214 2796 489 201.4 0 Materials Allegheny Technologies Inc. ATI +448.5 -37.1 33550 5279 2049 446.4 0 Pharma Allergan Inc. AGN +41.3 2.6 10627 3371 132 44.4 0 Information technology Altera Corp. ALTR +502.4 10.9 70631 32126 13771 492.2 0.3 Consumer products Altria Group Inc. MO +69.8 12.2 117706 5522 345 72 0 Retailers Amazon.com Inc. AMZN +107.7 -22.1 8512 2571 246 109.4 0 Utilities Ameren Corporation AEE +23.8 -10.8 23915 11736 243 24.2 0.7 Utilities American Electric Power Co., Inc. AEP +280.9 75.1 72290 31487 7600 279.2 11.8 Financials American Express Company AXP +747.2 28.8 59187 -82917 8171 749.7 0.4 Insurance American International Group, Inc. A.I.G. AIG +87.3 16.1 31253 2711 206 86.8 2.9 Financials American Tower Corporation AMT +199.1 35.6 14662 5659 986 200.3 0 Financials Ameriprise Financial, Inc. AMP +289.8 -23.5 12191 5633 1484 301 4.5 Health care AmerisourceBergen Corporation ABC +185.6 39.8 78660 28488 4506 182.2 8.5 Pharma Amgen Inc. AMGN +247.2 -53.6 11664 3710 810 258 10 Information technology Amphenol Corporation APH +318.1 78.1 43985 13368 3765 323.1 -5.7 Energy Anadarko Petroleum Corporation APC +224.8 -72.6 13463 4402 870 234.4 -21.4 Information technology Analog Devices, Inc. ADI +268.8 82.7 18735 6675 1580 272.4 0 Insurance Aon plc AON +406.4 14.3 29247 24107 8625 407.9 -13.6 Energy Apache Corp. APA +750.2 17.9 4625 -797 26 750.3 22.5 Financials Apartment Investment & Management Co. AIV +513.4 8 1875 5139 2281 512.2 3.3 Consumer products Apollo Group Inc. APOL +151.8 -48.7 400236 134527 18844 159.1 -10.9 Information technology Apple Inc. AAPL +342.2 -68.4 16057 7443 2172 336.2 5.4 Information technology Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT +316 16.3 21951 15613 4260 310.6 7 Consumer products Archer Daniels Midland Company ADM +491.3 29.2 3614 4354 1844 487.1 0 Insurance Assurant Inc. AIZ +302.6 -37.4 206594 67738 17819 302.5 0 Telecom AT&T, Inc. T +147.7 -24.9 8583 1809 263 157.9 13.4 Information technology Autodesk, Inc. ADSK +437.5 -43.9 31167 11245 4175 427 -2.8 Information technology Automatic Data Processing, Inc. ADP +704.6 3.9 5119 760 646 689.7 6.1 Retailers AutoNation Inc. AN +384.6 56.6 14265 6915 2182 368.5 12.9 Retailers AutoZone, Inc. AZO +679 -17.4 4251 447 493 690.3 6 Industrials Avery Dennison Corporation AVY +546.2 2.8 8906 4839 2304 547.6 0 Consumer products Avon Products Inc. AVP +507 28.9 19776 10790 4712 502.2 0 Energy Baker Hughes Incorporated BHI +285 29.2 7038 3374 827 280 -9.7 Materials Ball Corporation BLL +460.1 -4.1 132141 31231 12417 455.8 -2.7 Financials Bank of America Corporation BAC +134.7 20.8 38097 14912 1922 148.6 3.8 Health care Baxter International Inc. BAX +490 3.7 21263 11086 4631 482.8 1.9 Financials BB&T Corporation BBT +407.8 -17.1 9808 2511 879 401.4 4.7 Consumer products Beam, Inc. BEAM +276.2 -6.4 18516 8911 2166 279.1 0.6 Health care Becton, Dickinson and Company BDX +444 -9.4 14440 6329 2405 433.8 -17.1 Retailers Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. BBBY +344.8 49.3 4156 1697 505 344.2 5.3 Materials Bemis Company, Inc. BMS +272.4 45.7 259564 96365 22584 271.5 -13.1 Financials Berkshire Hathaway Inc. BRK.A +435.5 -8.2 8795 11764 4396 427.6 -5 Retailers Best Buy Co., Inc. BBY +380.7 -42.8 45875 8132 2623 371 0 Pharma Biogen Idec Inc. BIIB +342.9 66.7 42698 13734 4044 338.5 14.8 Financials BlackRock, Inc. BLK +168.4 -32.9 6351 2664 424 177.3 2.8 Information technology BMC Software Inc. BMC +344.5 8.1 8425 2467 691 327.2 6 Consumer products BorgWarner Inc. BWA +733.4 -11.5 10546 -8436 886 749.9 0 Health care Boston Scientific Corporation BSX +150.5 22.4 66915 28293 4460 181.3 -10 Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb Company BMY +32.4 0.7 19096 3223 96 34.9 0 Information technology Broadcom Corp. BRCM +361.4 -1.2 15070 4131 1288 354.9 18.3 Consumer products Brown-Forman Corporation BF.B +409 -59.3 11079 5693 1992 401.9 -2.5 Information technology CA Technologies CA +197.6 41.1 3826 810 132 191.9 3.6 Consumer products Cablevision Systems Corporation CVC +47.6 17.1 14410 1488 60 46.2 0 Energy Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation COG +292.5 67.7 15476 4505 1149 293.6 0 Energy Cameron International Corporation CAM +342.2 17.9 14197 6633 1967 340.3 14.8 Consumer products Campbell Soup Company CPB +352.3 34.4 31996 19740 6041 351.2 -5.7 Financials Capital One Financial Corp. COF +359.3 -24.3 14579 8109 2555 362.7 6.3 Health care Cardinal Health, Inc. CAH +174 35.9 7678 2237 348 179.1 0 Health care CareFusion Corporation CFN +441.8 16.6 9670 2439 918 431.5 11.5 Retailers CarMax Inc. KMX +4.7 5.6 26166 11794 74 7.4 0 Consumer products Carnival Corporation CCL +241.3 -26.5 55148 28835 6032 239.3 -9.1 Industrials Caterpillar Inc. CAT +677.1 -8.4 8030 757 863 686.3 -1 Financials CBRE Group, Inc. CBG +748.5 -15.6 29349 -4162 1724 751.6 -6.6 Consumer products CBS Corporation CBS +249.7 -13.4 48876 3720 784 244.7 -16.4 Pharma Celgene Corporation CELG +39.6 -5.1 10315 4495 160 40.6 8.3 Utilities CenterPoint Energy, Inc. CNP +192.8 2.6 22630 5724 1033 207.7 0 Telecom CenturyLink, Inc. CTL +282.8 -27.7 16088 2198 554 288 -3.6 Health care Cerner Corporation CERN +362.6 6.7 11498 8790 2666 348.7 0 Materials CF Industries Holdings, Inc. CF +390.5 -48.4 9523 3966 1335 386.1 2.4 Industrials CH Robinson Worldwide Inc. CHRW +757.4 17.6 12747 -1160 86 749.9 -1.3 Energy Chesapeake Energy Corporation CHK +461 35.7 228869 219880 85464 453.4 -11 Energy Chevron Corporation CVX +353 -4.4 10444 1542 447 341.3 0.5 Consumer products Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. CMG +306.8 -17.7 18722 10069 2655 303.9 -4.3 Health care Cigna Corp. CI +289.7 84.4 7804 3551 873 282.5 0 Insurance Cincinnati Financial Corp. CINF +431.9 -36.7 5431 2633 959 421.5 -7.6 Industrials Cintas Corporation CTAS +232.6 -49.5 109679 54808 11582 244.6 17.5 Information technology Cisco Systems, Inc. CSCO +750.1 2.8 132501 -23764 19716 750.6 -6 Financials Citigroup, Inc. C +116.7 3.1 12699 1816 190 120.9 3.6 Information technology Citrix Systems, Inc. CTXS +393.2 4.8 2998 3855 1291 385.1 0 Materials Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. CLF +492.7 21.5 20098 9133 3915 493.2 -0.1 Financials CME Group Inc. CME +48.1 -21 7535 2276 94 48.6 -4 Utilities CMS Energy Corp. CMS +379.3 8.6 14039 7177 2338 374.6 17.4 Consumer products Coach, Inc. COH +266.5 -3.9 10155 4452 1026 267.4 -7.2 Consumer products Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. CCE +229.9 -33.5 22562 5002 1024 229.5 24.5 Information technology Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation CTSH +350 -15.9 54989 20199 6017 343.3 -13.7 Consumer products Colgate-Palmolive Co. CL +285.6 14.7 108363 39433 10034 281.5 -1.9 Consumer products Comcast Corporation CMCS.A +486 26.6 6493 2699 1121 482.1 10.5 Financials Comerica Incorporated CMA +695.6 -21 7318 131 1827 695.1 -0.1 Information technology Computer Sciences Corporation CSC +456.6 -20.4 14421 5206 2074 458.7 2.8 Consumer products ConAgra Foods, Inc. CAG +690.2 20.4 72417 78775 58208 689 6.6 Energy ConocoPhillips COP +212.4 60.3 7595 3696 714 219.6 -10.7 Energy CONSOL Energy Inc. CNX +53.1 -14.2 18006 9045 418 55 1.5 Utilities Consolidated Edison Inc. ED +607.5 -8.7 8921 1332 705 607.2 -9.1 Consumer products Constellation Brands Inc. STZ +94.8 -24.7 19663 16262 1344 94.9 0 Information technology Corning Inc. GLW +389.1 27.3 46709 12652 4301 392.5 0.4 Retailers Costco Wholesale Corporation COST +493.3 -32.2 6503 4369 1821 479.4 0 Health care Coventry Health Care Inc. CVH +316.6 -21 31698 10426 2858 315.3 -5.6 Health care Covidien plc COV +340.8 -22.6 8251 3765 1051 324.5 -1.9 Health care CR Bard Inc. BCR +764.3 -19.5 20974 -718 18 754.6 0 Telecom Crown Castle International Corp. CCI +141.9 1.2 24466 14424 1998 159.3 0 Industrials CSX Corp. CSX +274.3 -33.3 21408 9546 2306 284.3 13.1 Industrials Cummins Inc. CMI +440.3 3.7 69489 33466 12818 440.4 -5.3 Retailers CVS Caremark Corporation CVS +153.5 6.6 42076 12401 1951 178.4 -17.4 Industrials Danaher Corp. DHR +206.8 22.1 6478 3387 605 208.2 -0.3 Consumer products Darden Restaurants, Inc. DRI +290.1 -12.2 13267 4748 1206 291.1 5 Health care DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. DVA +757.2 -16.5 3309 -907 365 758.5 -1.4 Consumer products Dean Foods Company DF +336.7 -52 33689 19201 5378 324.7 11.8 Industrials Deere & Company DE +198.1 -68.9 24832 20110 3496 200.2 -25.4 Information technology Dell Inc. DELL +102.3 9.2 13397 13835 1265 107.1 -0.1 Consumer products Delphi Automotive PLC DLPH +62 25 6710 3155 166 62.7 0.4 Energy Denbury Resources Inc. DNR +226.5 17.4 5886 2019 414 237.5 0 Health care DENTSPLY International Inc. XRAY +702.3 12.1 22103 2182 2764 698.3 -4.7 Energy Devon Energy Corporation DVN +305.9 59.3 9580 8392 2219 304 0 Energy Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. DO +286.7 -2.8 31807 18633 4751 279.8 -19.3 Consumer products DIRECTV DTV +388.6 10 21654 13837 4492 377.2 -7 Financials Discover Financial Services DFS +353.2 5.2 28071 5829 1806 352.2 2.3 Consumer products Discovery Communications, Inc. DISC.A +398.4 -0.1 16479 3174 1043 383.6 19.3 Consumer products Dollar General Corporation DG +424.5 -14.9 10563 2899 1051 416.8 -2.7 Consumer products Dollar Tree, Inc. DLTR +427.3 -51.8 34641 16894 6147 418.2 0 Utilities Dominion Resources, Inc. D +262.9 -63.1 12741 5314 1251 271.8 -13.4 Industrials Dover Corporation DOV +736.2 -4.6 7545 -3785 -736 742.2 -4.5 Consumer products DR Horton Inc. DHI +452.1 -27.5 9521 4042 1577 446.7 -5.5 Consumer products Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. DPS +68.5 -24.6 12025 5669 346 69.9 -2.8 Utilities DTE Energy Company DTE +37.5 -16.8 51507 13084 432 37.2 -3.1 Utilities Duke Energy Corporation DUK +223.4 -34.1 3352 2439 476 226 -8.4 Industrials Dun & Bradstreet Corp. DNB +735.5 1.1 2890 -5238 -352 736.6 -9.7 Financials E*TRADE Financial Corporation ETFC +210.3 32.1 44851 18474 3464 215.7 0 Materials E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company DD +292.1 48.8 10520 3335 815 280.3 7.1 Materials Eastman Chemical Co. EMN +183.8 -4.1 28514 6338 1036 191.6 -15.9 Industrials Eaton Corporation plc ETN +213.5 -40.2 72362 14906 2880 225.5 10.4 Information technology eBay Inc. EBAY +272.4 23.4 23661 4329 1061 284.1 -1.7 Materials Ecolab Inc. ECL +128.4 -38.2 16607 9301 1180 148.1 0 Utilities Edison International EIX +119.5 10.6 9267 1562 171 125.8 0 Health care Edwards Lifesciences Corp. EW +737.9 -27.5 5182 -2191 94 749 8.5 Information technology Electronic Arts Inc. EA +205.7 -2.6 62141 25210 4894 219.4 -8.3 Pharma Eli Lilly and Company LLY +126.6 -3.5 48586 14598 1681 132.8 1.3 Information technology EMC Corporation EMC +384 -57.1 40429 18813 6070 372.5 1.8 Industrials Emerson Electric Co. EMR +205.9 54.7 13677 6154 1079 203.7 4.6 Energy Ensco plc ESV +78.8 -19.2 12109 9714 636 76.5 2.4 Utilities Entergy Corporation ETR +120.4 21.8 34502 9848 1144 133.3 -5.6 Energy EOG Resources, Inc. EOG +-4.6 9 10427 2482 -125 -1.1 -3.3 Energy EQT Corporation EQT +424.7 -32.8 6862 2359 845 411.4 14.1 Industrials Equifax Inc. EFX +-4.7 -0.1 18880 193 0 -0.9 -1.5 Financials Equity Residential EQR +185.8 -60.7 30312 22600 3809 193.8 0 Utilities Exelon Corporation EXC +743.7 17.3 8521 -520 566 749.8 0 Retailers Expedia Inc. EXPE +428 -41.8 7535 3105 1123 416.1 -11.4 Industrials Expeditors International of Washington Inc. EXPD +417.8 -24.3 46959 9587 3353 404.3 -6.8 Health care Express Scripts Holding Company ESRX +424.5 33.9 396968 394595 146254 422.7 8.7 Energy Exxon Mobil Corporation XOM +349.7 -70.7 5719 1408 428 346.5 -8.9 Information technology F5 Networks, Inc. FFIV +376.9 1.9 6878 3040 978 366.7 16.6 Consumer products Family Dollar Stores Inc. FDO +429.9 -20.9 14918 2806 1057 433.6 2.3 Industrials Fastenal Company FAST +265.2 -40.3 30182 13208 3076 265.7 6.3 Industrials FedEx Corporation FDX +500.5 -33.9 11532 2867 1230 493.3 -1.9 Information technology Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. FIS +411.2 5 14170 4621 1624 404.5 0.1 Financials Fifth Third Bancorp FITB +761.2 12.2 2508 -929 182 748.2 8.3 Financials First Horizon National Corporation FHN +146.7 -19.5 2357 1975 273 152.4 11.1 Information technology First Solar, Inc. FSLR +126.5 -27 18569 9298 1162 147.5 -9.8 Utilities FirstEnergy Corp. FE +438.6 -33.6 11436 4513 1677 427.3 7.6 Information technology Fiserv, Inc. FISV +363.2 -51.6 3709 1782 551 356.1 11.5 Information technology FLIR Systems, Inc. FLIR +258.5 -34 7771 3269 775 267.9 15.8 Industrials Flowserve Corp. FLS +352.3 -37.7 10169 5233 1628 354 -7.4 Industrials Fluor Corporation FLR +103.7 19.2 7854 2491 213 98.2 0 Materials FMC Corp. FMC +270.3 66.7 12534 3112 732 269.6 0 Energy FMC Technologies, Inc. FTI +35.9 13.1 50216 7397 251 38.5 -1.5 Consumer products Ford Motor Co. F +212.2 7.7 9983 6416 1186 212.2 2 Pharma Forest Laboratories Inc. FRX +309.8 -12.4 5574 1936 529 310.8 -32.7 Consumer products Fossil, Inc. FOSL +314 64.9 31767 13374 3711 316.1 9.7 Financials Franklin Resources Inc. BEN +689.8 -3.9 30791 21531 14211 689.9 1.6 Materials Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. FCX +124.7 6.8 4070 1574 185 134.9 0 Telecom Frontier Communications Corporation FTR +309.6 72.8 3566 3088 847 315 -4.9 Retailers GameStop Corp. GME +756.3 -11.1 4801 -3076 1450 746 0.4 Consumer products Gannett Co., Inc. GCI +125.8 13.6 6603 4487 501 128.5 0 Consumer products Garmin Ltd. GRMN +371.8 -62 24456 18213 5758 363.6 -7.3 Industrials General Dynamics Corp. GD +174.8 16.3 239776 109012 17511 184.4 5.2 Industrials General Electric Company GE +281.7 -17.1 31395 12808 3171 287.3 -29.4 Consumer products General Mills, Inc. GIS +444.1 -27.3 12061 4901 1858 437.3 4 Consumer products Genuine Parts Company GPC +689.6 32.6 4798 737 1191 689.9 0 Insurance Genworth Financial Inc. GNW +266.2 -16.4 71932 19562 4659 273.9 0 Pharma Gilead Sciences Inc. GILD +674.9 -14 3052 1340 1232 690 2.5 Consumer products Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. GT +187.6 -37.9 255440 56416 9683 196.2 -3.4 Information technology Google Inc. GOOG +278.4 2.1 7715 4129 988 272 -13.1 Consumer products H&R Block, Inc. HRB +193.6 27 23219 7523 1307 199.4 -0.1 Consumer products H. J. Heinz Company HNZ +332 75.5 35759 19904 5670 329 7 Energy Halliburton Company HAL +378.6 -10.5 11532 4837 1556 370.3 10 Consumer products Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG +696.6 -9.2 2906 433 313 690.1 -2.4 Consumer products Harman International Industries, Incorporated HAR +402.2 -61.6 5049 4295 1480 395.7 0.8 Information technology Harris Corporation HRS +219.1 34.3 5568 2881 563 224.2 5.5 Consumer products Hasbro Inc. HAS +9.7 15.9 23427 2139 14 7.5 5.1 Financials HCP, Inc. HCP +16 7.3 18343 729 7 11 -4.9 Financials Health Care REIT, Inc. HCN +167.1 68.5 6536 3999 597 172.6 5.8 Energy Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP +591.3 9.4 24530 19554 10079 592.6 0 Energy Hess Corporation HES +198.3 -16.6 42632 37088 6912 210.1 16.1 Information technology Hewlett-Packard Company HPQ +250.8 -42.8 57554 14780 3222 251.9 1.6 Industrials Honeywell International Inc. HON +396.5 -8.4 10674 3560 1195 391.7 2.2 Consumer products Hormel Foods Corporation HRL +190.7 10.4 5057 1383 248 205.8 -0.4 Pharma Hospira Inc. HSP +85.8 5 12841 554 43 90.4 -7.1 Financials Host Hotels & Resorts Inc. HST +680.8 -3.2 4210 2140 1391 689.7 -6.4 Financials Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. HCBK +459.2 -35.9 12327 9779 3822 449.3 0 Health care Humana Inc. HUM +765 6.7 6200 -2067 27 761.1 5.2 Financials Huntington Bancshares Incorporated HBAN +356.1 -46.5 27946 14434 4495 356.7 2.2 Industrials Illinois Tool Works Inc. ITW +701.1 -14.9 16270 1746 2158 689.8 -1.6 Industrials Ingersoll-Rand Plc IR +131.2 -13.1 4661 1652 188 127.4 -0.3 Utilities Integrys Energy Group, Inc. TEG +319.9 -74.5 104416 71255 19607 317.2 -6.5 Information technology Intel Corporation INTC +346.2 43 11349 3485 1019 345.2 5.7 Financials IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. ICE +164.1 -14.1 233289 111970 16861 175.5 21.9 Information technology International Business Machines Corporation I.B.M. IBM +295.7 53.4 6027 2068 512 287.4 6.5 Materials International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. IFF +423.4 -8.4 4289 2671 961 416.1 4.1 Consumer products International Game Technology IGT +111.1 14.3 20919 5316 560 121.4 0 Materials International Paper Company IP +345.5 -77.7 18921 5042 1457 333.1 -3.9 Information technology Intuit Inc. INTU +250.9 -0.9 19950 3144 704 258.9 1.8 Health care Intuitive Surgical, Inc. ISRG +285.3 62.5 12681 4860 1242 292.3 0.7 Financials Invesco Ltd. IVZ +437 -24.6 6929 1779 681 440.9 -0.8 Industrials Iron Mountain Inc. IRM +393.2 36.3 3488 5180 1731 388.9 9.9 Retailers J. C. Penney Company, Inc. JCP +699.1 -26.1 3670 484 426 695 -6.2 Information technology Jabil Circuit Inc. JBL +394.1 -54.5 7036 3233 1106 391.1 -2.8 Industrials Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. JEC +744.8 -32.8 3069 -1027 42 745.5 4.2 Information technology JDS Uniphase Corporation JDSU +230 -0.7 226868 89050 18449 238.9 6.4 Pharma Johnson & Johnson JNJ +369.3 -8.1 22781 7501 2364 360.7 10 Consumer products Johnson Controls Inc. JCI +250.5 -33.1 6036 4339 918 240.4 2.2 Industrials Joy Global, Inc. JOY +328.7 50.4 184773 122170 35136 330.4 -5.2 Financials JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPM +204.4 -49.4 9083 3193 618 215.3 2.5 Information technology Juniper Networks, Inc. JNPR +336.1 10.6 23301 9159 2554 319.4 1.2 Consumer products Kellogg Company K +699 0.1 9056 1329 1988 693.6 -1.2 Financials KeyCorp KEY +261.4 5.8 38468 15354 3472 262.8 2.6 Consumer products Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB +54.4 12.2 9395 1114 57 58.7 3.9 Financials Kimco Realty Corporation KIM +681.6 6.6 39480 584 1664 686.9 -9.5 Energy Kinder Morgan, Inc. KMI +264.6 -78.9 8638 3010 705 269.4 -16.6 Information technology KLA-Tencor Corporation KLAC +397.8 8.5 10661 10100 3456 399.4 -8.9 Retailers Kohl's Corp. KSS +399.4 33.3 13513 5780 1978 395.6 11.9 Retailers L Brands, Inc. LTD +275.7 -24.8 7381 7568 1796 273.7 19.6 Industrials L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. LLL +402 -40.7 8635 5199 1759 389.7 -5 Health care Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings LH +115.8 -4.4 6697 2597 277 123 -3.8 Information technology Lam Research Corporation LRCX +730.3 1.4 4053 -709 -264 738.1 2.1 Financials Legg Mason Inc. LM +358.3 12.5 4745 1304 403 352.4 11.2 Consumer products Leggett & Platt, Incorporated LEG +729.2 -4.8 7494 -3990 -1207 744.5 8.8 Consumer products Lennar Corp. LEN +56.2 4.7 10167 1835 96 60.2 -3.7 Financials Leucadia National Corporation LUK +552.6 -1.7 11168 1898 911 551.6 0 Health care Life Technologies Corporation LIFE +109.7 23.1 8472 4223 387 105.3 0 Insurance Lincoln National Corporation LNC +264.9 -70.7 8342 3198 767 274.5 12.3 Information technology Linear Technology Corporation LLTC +263.7 -52.6 30435 24657 5769 264.3 -6.1 Industrials Lockheed Martin Corporation LMT +259.7 86.7 17171 12038 2668 254.8 0 Insurance Loews Corporation L +437.7 -16.2 15598 9469 3563 432 -3.1 Consumer products Lorillard, Inc. LO +452.6 14.1 42430 21974 8555 448.6 8.8 Retailers Lowe's Companies Inc. LOW +757.5 -31.4 3547 -2933 133 754 -5.9 Information technology LSI Corporation LSI +354.3 21.5 33833 4861 1423 337.2 -0.8 Materials LyondellBasell Industries NV LYB +297.8 60.4 13014 6093 1586 300.8 -0.7 Financials M&T Bank Corporation MTB +693.5 6.6 17221 1623 1860 690.1 -1.8 Retailers Macy's, Inc. M +669 6 23252 30679 17902 671 0 Energy Marathon Oil Corporation MRO +127 32.5 27580 15976 1860 133.8 7 Energy Marathon Petroleum Corporation MPC +269.3 14 12948 3169 776 277 12.9 Consumer products Marriott International, Inc. MAR +413.5 57.4 20532 5770 2037 406 0 Insurance Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. MMC +762.5 -28.1 6994 -624 652 750.1 -5.3 Industrials Masco Corporation MAS +357.3 -61.4 65605 12941 3986 354.4 0.1 Information technology Mastercard Incorporated MA +223.1 28.5 14805 4614 905 225.6 -2.1 Consumer products Mattel, Inc. MAT +273 7.3 9375 2664 612 259.7 -7.6 Consumer products McCormick & Company, Incorporated MKC +329 25.2 101783 39309 10627 321.1 18.8 Consumer products McDonald's Corp. MCD +133 8.3 24905 9236 1114 137.4 -2 Health care McKesson Corporation MCK +362.4 -15.8 15517 4064 1242 355.8 -15.2 Consumer products Mead Johnson Nutrition Company MJN +152.1 60.6 6419 1680 247 168.9 0 Materials MeadWestvaco Corporation MWV +216.5 18.4 47020 20448 4038 226.8 0 Health care Medtronic, Inc. MDT +330 -34.4 137457 46439 12893 319.3 0 Pharma Merck & Co. Inc. MRK +211.2 75.3 39913 20831 3759 208.2 6.8 Insurance MetLife, Inc. MET +11.8 0.8 4115 2166 20 10.6 0 Telecom MetroPCS Communications, Inc. PCS +86.3 -15.7 6974 2061 154 85.8 4 Information technology Microchip Technology Inc. MCHP +751.1 -31.8 9595 -2581 204 747.5 -6 Information technology Micron Technology Inc. MU +245.3 -73.9 239477 139087 30100 251 -9.1 Information technology Microsoft Corporation MSFT +415.2 -53.8 4604 1312 464 408.1 0.8 Information technology Molex Incorporated MOLX +97.3 15.6 9170 3918 336 99 0.3 Consumer products Molson Coors Brewing Company TAP +612.3 2.1 53767 14234 7576 612.5 1.4 Consumer products Mondelez International, Inc. MDLZ +258.9 20.7 56160 14024 3305 270.4 -0.1 Materials Monsanto Company MON +459.5 -28.1 8610 2105 832 454 -3.9 Consumer products Monster Beverage Corporation MNST +382.8 17.4 11803 5076 1653 377.5 5.4 Financials Moody's Corp. MCO +479.5 -3.5 42628 16718 6803 471.8 8.2 Financials Morgan Stanley MS +685.8 -20.9 17202 1877 1499 689.1 5.6 Information technology Motorola Solutions, Inc. MSI +400.7 41.8 12145 9684 3271 388.7 0 Energy Murphy Oil Corporation MUR +683.7 -12.3 11222 854 1276 689.8 4.4 Pharma Mylan, Inc. MYL +381.1 63.1 4595 2885 920 364 -0.8 Energy Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR +425.6 7.2 28939 16022 5961 429.4 -17.1 Energy National Oilwell Varco, Inc. NOV +70.8 -16.5 12229 2704 177 75.1 0 Information technology NetApp, Inc. NTAP +290.2 56.1 9130 1092 279 293.9 0 Retailers Netflix, Inc. NFLX +271.4 0.2 7234 2077 481 269.4 10.6 Consumer products Newell Rubbermaid Inc. NWL +737.6 23.7 2974 -445 459 750.3 5.5 Energy Newfield Exploration Co. NFX +513 20.5 19378 12721 5532 500.1 0 Materials Newmont Mining Corporation NEM +480.8 -30.9 73032 16800 6919 473.8 0.5 Consumer products News Corp. NWSA +3.6 -15.3 33946 13255 61 4.4 -2.5 Utilities NextEra Energy, Inc. NEE +304 10.3 53572 15004 3995 300.5 -1.9 Consumer products Nike Inc. NKE +134 -31.8 9392 2904 366 150.2 8.3 Utilities NiSource Inc. NI +197.1 73.7 9565 7473 1276 195.9 7.4 Energy Noble Corp. NE +248.4 88.9 20649 5871 1268 248.5 0 Energy Noble Energy, Inc. NBL +463.2 11.7 10825 5733 2286 454.1 -9.6 Retailers Nordstrom Inc. JWN +254.8 -25.9 23700 14652 3108 245.8 14.1 Industrials Norfolk Southern Corp. NSC +176 -55.6 13787 3227 490 174.5 0 Utilities Northeast Utilities NU +310.4 52.5 13053 6458 1778 312.4 -0.4 Financials Northern Trust Corporation NTRS +538.4 -0.7 16888 12570 5854 535.7 0 Industrials Northrop Grumman Corporation NOC +46.1 -9.1 8649 4727 178 46.6 3.6 Utilities NRG Energy, Inc. NRG +369.7 1.8 13963 7609 2432 367.5 0 Materials Nucor Corporation NUE +47.2 -1.9 7683 2205 98 51.9 0 Information technology NVIDIA Corporation NVDA +361.5 27.8 9121 2333 734 352.9 4.2 Financials NYSE Euronext, Inc. NYX +323.9 68.1 11569 3554 980 317.1 1.5 Retailers O'Reilly Automotive Inc. ORLY +396.8 61 65354 52331 17100 375.6 0.5 Energy Occidental Petroleum Corporation OXY +255.3 32.5 15543 9180 1965 247.9 16.7 Consumer products Omnicom Group Inc. OMC +23.6 -1.3 10022 4846 120 27.2 9.7 Utilities ONEOK Inc. OKE +280.9 -75.4 152437 54270 13204 279.8 -3.5 Information technology Oracle Corporation ORCL +645.3 0.2 4207 1515 850 645.4 0 Materials Owens-Illinois, Inc. OI +271.8 -60.2 17049 7199 1747 280.6 -16.4 Industrials PACCAR Inc. PCAR +397.8 -47.1 7439 1865 640 395 2.9 Industrials Pall Corporation PLL +265.2 -29.9 13409 6922 1671 274.7 11.8 Industrials Parker-Hannifin Corporation PH +403.8 -46.6 3961 2031 692 394.3 -9.4 Health care Patterson Companies, Inc. PDCO +380 -67.7 12758 4792 1571 376.7 0 Information technology Paychex, Inc. PAYX +225.9 48.9 5484 4486 883 226 -12.3 Energy Peabody Energy Corp. BTU +456.6 -43.8 10811 985 391 456.6 0 Industrials Pentair Ltd. PNR +376.5 -4.5 4363 1344 432 369.6 -10.1 Financials People's United Financial Inc. PBCT +31.8 -7.5 5445 1564 50 33.7 7.3 Utilities Pepco Holdings, Inc. POM +239.2 25.4 124140 48137 10259 244.1 0.7 Consumer products Pepsico, Inc. PEP +428.1 -10.3 3807 634 242 439.7 0 Health care PerkinElmer Inc. PKI +213.8 -11.9 11156 1743 360 233.5 -12.7 Pharma Perrigo Co. PRGO +415.4 11.4 6512 2161 765 408.3 1.3 Retailers PetSmart, Inc. PETM +499.1 -14.6 209533 63501 27312 494.7 0 Pharma Pfizer Inc. PFE +15.2 -17.3 19237 8817 129 15.7 -5.8 Utilities PG&E Corp. PCG +321.7 -1.4 155089 63907 17264 315.2 -17.1 Consumer products Philip Morris International, Inc. PM +194.5 54.2 39455 19535 3331 195.5 -3.4 Energy Phillips 66 PSX +63.4 -17.9 6448 2922 166 64.5 2.5 Utilities Pinnacle West Capital Corporation PNW +80.3 24.8 16066 2129 148 80.2 0 Energy Pioneer Natural Resources Co. PXD +314.3 -62.8 2966 3714 1023 313.6 -12.4 Industrials Pitney Bowes Inc. PBI +340.8 35.7 18777 7134 2026 325.6 0.3 Materials PPG Industries Inc. PPG +124.4 -17.1 18462 8614 1002 131.1 6.7 Utilities PPL Corporation PPL +227.2 39.2 32988 11521 2391 238.2 0.9 Materials Praxair Inc. PX +306.4 -58 26794 8676 2263 299.8 0 Industrials Precision Castparts Corp. PCP +216.3 51 34737 4716 897 218.8 0 Retailers priceline.com Incorporated PCLN +180.8 59.3 9873 4918 818 187.7 -2.8 Insurance Principal Financial Group Inc. PFG +304.1 33.6 215227 86212 22378 295.1 20.8 Consumer products Procter & Gamble Co. PG +406 51.1 15460 7398 2504 389.2 0 Insurance Progressive Corp. PGR +735 16.7 18518 -1632 443 746.6 15.5 Financials Prologis, Inc. PLD +233.7 80 26071 16352 3255 228.8 0 Insurance Prudential Financial, Inc. PRU +335.7 -75.5 17476 13842 3966 329.5 0 Utilities Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. PEG +740.7 -9.9 7644 -7516 -1641 740.3 3.2 Consumer products PulteGroup, Inc. PHM +348.7 13 8759 1340 405 344.2 7.6 Consumer products PVH Corp. PVH +21.5 13.3 5534 2876 49 19.3 0 Energy QEP Resources, Inc. QEP +213.5 -61.6 113156 26597 5180 223.4 -10.1 Information technology QUALCOMM Incorporated Qualcomm Incorporated QCOM +343.6 -27.8 5967 1543 448 335.8 -3.6 Industrials Quanta Services, Inc. PWR +386.9 -33.4 9005 6310 2050 373.2 0 Health care Quest Diagnostics Inc. DGX +344.4 26.6 15385 4420 1265 335.5 7 Consumer products Ralph Lauren Corporation RL +-0.2 16.1 12853 1123 4 4.7 2.7 Energy Range Resources Corporation RRC +206.4 -26.7 19010 15576 2992 218.3 -7.7 Industrials Raytheon Co. RTN +61.3 -11.1 9266 819 42 59.2 0 Information technology Red Hat, Inc. RHT +734.4 7.5 11364 -4184 483 741.8 7.7 Financials Regions Financial Corporation RF +431.3 -29.6 11781 4100 1500 425.8 -1.8 Industrials Republic Services, Inc. RSG +415.5 -11.4 24706 12067 4262 406.5 -3.4 Consumer products Reynolds American Inc. RAI +446.5 -46.4 4993 1686 631 432.1 -5.2 Industrials Robert Half International Inc. RHI +347.4 -52 12176 4249 1195 326.6 -7.7 Industrials Rockwell Automation Inc. ROK +231.9 -19.7 8616 5162 1066 238.3 8.7 Industrials Rockwell Collins Inc. COL +344.3 -59.8 12194 2886 798 320.2 -13.2 Industrials Roper Industries Inc. ROP +401.2 24.7 13052 3987 1381 402.6 6.6 Retailers Ross Stores Inc. ROST +399.1 49.7 4153 2514 834 384.9 -6.4 Energy Rowan Companies plc RDC +68.2 -10.3 3071 1724 107 69.2 0 Industrials Ryder System, Inc. R +500.9 23.1 6072 4547 1971 498.4 0 Retailers Safeway Inc. SWY +506.9 -31 4736 3725 1604 495.5 4.7 Information technology SAIC, Inc. SAI +185.4 -15.6 24436 358 61 197 18.9 Information technology salesforce.com, inc CRM +590.9 -9.3 13444 2465 1272 593.4 0 Information technology SanDisk Corp. SNDK +171.8 -62.3 7246 3202 450 161.7 0 Utilities SCANA Corp. SCG +225.9 65.3 99773 35973 7093 226.9 1.5 Energy Schlumberger Limited SLB +389.6 -26.4 9925 3915 1275 379.2 -14.4 Consumer products Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc. SNI +25.3 7 12912 4095 94 25.5 0 Information technology Seagate Technology Public Limited Company STX +765 0.7 4354 -322 710 749.9 0 Materials Sealed Air Corporation SEE +138 -9 20001 8228 1011 141.3 7.4 Utilities Sempra Energy SRE +302.2 52.5 9129 3257 860 303.5 0 Materials Sigma-Aldrich Corporation SIAL +674.4 -1.5 9026 3732 2746 690 5.4 Financials SLM Corporation SLM +309.4 -65.2 4819 2015 545 308.4 -10.9 Industrials Snap-on Inc. SNA +137.4 -21.4 41267 17872 2157 136.8 -4 Utilities Southern Company SO +208.4 -17.9 9337 3253 557 200.4 -6.8 Industrials Southwest Airlines Co. LUV +56 20.2 13097 1764 85 55.1 -0.2 Energy Southwestern Energy Co. SWN +160.1 63.6 20289 9066 1333 168.7 -1.8 Energy Spectra Energy Corp. SE +737.9 -19.4 18968 -47436 -24 744.3 0 Telecom Sprint Nextel Corp. S +258.6 -5.6 11873 5580 1226 250.9 -3.1 Health care St. Jude Medical Inc. STJ +373.7 -52.3 12567 2350 743 364 9.4 Industrials Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. SWK +361.6 34.2 8929 8256 2496 345.3 -19.3 Retailers Staples, Inc. SPLS +342.2 -2.5 43549 7379 2058 330.9 -4.2 Consumer products Starbucks Corporation SBUX +93.8 7.9 12007 2119 172 91 -0.1 Consumer products Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. HOT +205.5 44.5 26415 14658 2703 212.3 0 Financials State Street Corporation STT +254.4 -56.3 9050 1830 413 255.1 -10.1 Industrials Stericycle, Inc. SRCL +360.9 -34.5 24656 9694 3048 361.6 -3.9 Health care Stryker Corporation SYK +369 31.5 15330 4069 1257 356.7 11.6 Financials SunTrust Banks, Inc. STI +755.3 -24.2 16713 -2354 1592 752.2 1.3 Information technology Symantec Corporation SYMC +512.6 0.8 20017 10644 4652 506.4 -1.3 Consumer products Sysco Corporation SYY +405 -8.3 19197 6318 2169 394.8 0 Financials T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. TROW +386.6 -2.6 44422 25481 8364 381.5 7.3 Consumer products Target Corp. TGT +692 -28.6 17340 2585 1671 687.8 -4.1 Information technology TE Connectivity Ltd. TEL +11.4 -10.3 3965 2199 22 12.8 1.5 Utilities TECO Energy, Inc. TE +-0.4 -6.8 4589 819 -126 0 0 Health care Tenet Healthcare Corp. THC +118.1 -11.1 8798 2467 277 127.8 -8.9 Information technology Teradata Corporation TDC +219.6 -50.2 2965 430 86 232 0.7 Information technology Teradyne Inc. TER +268.6 74.3 7416 3238 776 277.3 0 Energy Tesoro Corporation TSO +293.6 -57.5 38808 17631 4379 288.3 14.6 Information technology Texas Instruments Inc. TXN +345.4 -34.5 7889 2978 888 343 0 Industrials Textron Inc. TXT +395.5 -61.6 9389 11225 3886 398.3 0 Utilities The AES Corporation AES +178.2 68.5 23925 10241 1595 178.7 0.3 Insurance The Allstate Corporation ALL +597.7 -0.9 31942 13566 7025 595.3 0 Financials The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation BK +78.7 -6.1 65597 27654 1939 80.5 0 Industrials The Boeing Company BA +478.6 -16.1 21524 8778 3636 474 -4.2 Financials The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW +295.6 77.5 23062 16489 4169 290.5 5.4 Insurance The Chubb Corporation CB +466.8 -32.4 11441 4304 1734 461.7 -5.3 Consumer products The Clorox Company CLX +158.3 44.2 182102 61845 9431 175.4 -0.1 Consumer products The Coca-Cola Company KO +467.7 -21.5 37065 14006 5625 461.7 0 Materials The Dow Chemical Company DOW +367.5 -44.6 24896 4773 1513 369.7 -21.5 Consumer products The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. +481.6 33.5 17146 9472 3762 459.5 14.2 Retailers The Gap, Inc. GPS +369.6 17.9 69111 70037 22170 365.1 0.9 Financials The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS +759.4 25.8 11382 -261 462 750.4 -12.1 Insurance The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. HIG +447.1 -18.5 19103 4291 1674 448.8 3.2 Consumer products The Hershey Company HSY +477.9 14.7 105799 34035 13766 465.9 -0.3 Retailers The Home Depot, Inc. HD +201.4 24.5 5526 2823 535 218.1 0 Consumer products The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. IPG +400.1 -15.7 10543 3041 1034 395.5 -4.8 Consumer products The J. M. Smucker Company SJM +395.9 17 16605 8769 2986 391.2 -11.9 Retailers The Kroger Co. KR +419.6 -2 14632 7190 2623 419.6 0 Financials The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. MHP +248.4 39.9 25085 13447 2904 249 -4.8 Materials The Mosaic Company MOS +405.7 -0.3 4805 3345 1103 382 -0.1 Financials The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. NDAQ +139.6 33.6 34914 18316 2235 140.1 0 Financials The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC +251.3 49.5 17135 4577 1000 251.8 5.4 Materials The Sherwin-Williams Company SHW +378.8 36.9 34603 10502 3487 380.2 -6.7 Retailers The TJX Companies, Inc. TJX +202.5 65 32024 23467 4253 209.4 -6.5 Insurance The Travelers Companies, Inc. TRV +374.8 -25.2 106196 44715 14314 367.7 -4.9 Consumer products The Walt Disney Company DIS +368.6 -37.3 3258 1876 598 362.6 -17.4 Consumer products The Washington Post Company WPO +228.3 -63.7 8219 7181 1501 237 4.9 Information technology The Western Union Company WU +336 -14.2 28016 6359 1752 319.2 6.1 Health care Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. TMO +446.2 22.8 9014 2999 1143 437.7 7.2 Retailers Tiffany & Co. TIF +764.8 -8.2 28176 -1138 1135 753.3 5.5 Consumer products Time Warner Cable Inc. TWC +300.8 -5.6 54545 14413 3684 293.9 -16.6 Consumer products Time Warner Inc. TWX +241.6 84.1 5450 4243 892 241.8 0 Insurance Torchmark Corp. TMK +409.6 -52.5 4510 2116 742 403.5 4.3 Information technology Total System Services, Inc. TSS +378.2 26.9 6957 1064 358 384 -15.9 Retailers TripAdvisor Inc. TRIP +745.3 -25.8 14526 -1525 1814 750.1 2.6 Industrials Tyco International Ltd. TYC +411.6 -3.2 8427 3225 1151 409.8 5.3 Consumer products Tyson Foods, Inc. TSN +237.7 49.9 62798 31572 6575 238.7 -2.6 Financials U.S. Bancorp USB +219.9 -23.3 65395 25649 5103 227.3 2.9 Industrials Union Pacific Corporation UNP +414.9 -41.3 78736 20559 7381 412.3 1.2 Industrials United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS +196.2 45 2486 3763 622 190.7 4.1 Materials United States Steel Corp. X +279.6 -47.7 86050 39589 9552 279.9 -1.5 Industrials United Technologies Corp. UTX +402 -28.3 63433 41701 14337 394.7 6.3 Health care UnitedHealth Group Incorporated UNH +327 84.3 7075 6016 1702 325.3 0 Insurance Unum Group UNM +403.7 5.3 5949 1765 618 402.9 -2.3 Retailers Urban Outfitters Inc. URBN +296.6 -18.2 18862 5746 1513 300.6 -27.9 Consumer products V.F. Corporation VFC +95.5 24.8 23339 14930 1225 94.5 0 Energy Valero Energy Corporation VLO +284.1 -35.8 7714 2964 762 295.9 -1.3 Health care Varian Medical Systems, Inc. VAR +144.7 -14.1 7041 707 92 142.6 6.6 Information technology VeriSign, Inc. VRSN +100.1 -7.7 141285 62772 5398 99.1 0 Telecom Verizon Communications Inc. VZ +389.6 -16.1 32442 16022 5364 385.2 -6 Consumer products Viacom, Inc. VIAB +525.1 -9.8 109944 16450 7342 513.3 0 Information technology Visa Inc. V +65.3 -3.5 16418 2417 152 72.6 0 Financials Vornado Realty Trust VNO +701.6 -6.5 6358 257 174 690.3 -7.9 Materials Vulcan Materials Company VMC +402.2 -53.9 15643 5186 1803 399.1 -4.2 Industrials W.W. Grainger, Inc. GWW +363.5 54.5 254473 130047 39832 351.8 0 Retailers Wal-Mart Stores Inc. WMT +389.7 45.7 45157 20826 6925 379.2 7.3 Retailers Walgreen Co. WAG +345.1 -43.1 18052 9473 2704 329.2 1.2 Industrials Waste Management, Inc. WM +109.2 5.6 7968 2517 243 111.3 0 Health care Waters Corp. WAT +393.1 -39.7 20444 27961 9356 382.3 0 Health care WellPoint Inc. WLP +251.1 69.1 195238 104261 23401 255.3 13.9 Financials Wells Fargo & Company WFC +15.8 -4.9 12089 5982 63 12.2 0 Information technology Western Digital Corporation WDC +768.1 14.2 17133 -3283 971 755.1 10.5 Financials Weyerhaeuser Co. WY +217.2 40.6 8995 2441 510 238.3 15.1 Consumer products Whirlpool Corp. WHR +428.5 -3.3 15520 2478 928 429.6 3.2 Retailers Whole Foods Market, Inc. WFM +170.5 60 25392 6970 1087 179.6 -0.1 Energy Williams Companies, Inc. WMB +149.6 -2.8 4979 3582 509 163.6 0 Telecom Windstream Corporation WIN +57.5 -21.9 9879 4047 217 61.9 -4.2 Utilities Wisconsin Energy Corp. WEC +417.2 4.8 3405 107 39 418.1 -14 Energy WPX Energy, Inc. WPX +359.4 -9.3 8659 2102 640 353.2 -7.4 Consumer products Wyndham Worldwide Corporation WYN +47.3 8.3 12380 2299 90 48 5.9 Consumer products Wynn Resorts Ltd. WYNN +6.8 -4.6 14844 6765 51 8.9 7.7 Utilities Xcel Energy Inc. XEL +113.7 -17.4 10574 6374 656 115.7 -2.9 Information technology Xerox Corporation XRX +85.9 -23 9610 3149 231 83.9 -2.9 Information technology Xilinx Inc. XLNX +758.4 33.6 9144 -376 662 750.4 12.5 Insurance XL Group plc XL +283.9 -60 5186 1748 424 287.2 -12.2 Industrials Xylem Inc. XYL +332.7 -63.8 25858 10170 2812 319 10.1 Information technology Yahoo! Inc. YHOO +249 10.1 30290 9276 1955 241.8 -17.2 Consumer products Yum! Brands, Inc. YUM +326.5 -18.3 12421 6081 1652 309.4 3.2 Health care Zimmer Holdings, Inc. ZMH +763.9 20.6 4443 -541 390 754 18.1 Financials Zions Bancorp. ZION \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/countries.csv b/data/countries.csv new file mode 100755 index 0000000..784c41d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/countries.csv @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +Country_Name,Country_Code,Region,IncomeGroup,SpecialNotes +Aruba,ABW,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD,SNA data for 2000-2011 are updated from official government statistics; 1994-1999 from UN databases. Base year has changed from 1995 to 2000. +Afghanistan,AFG,South Asia,Low income,Fiscal year end: March 20; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. National accounts data are sourced from the IMF and differ from the Central Statistics Organization numbers due to exclusion of the opium economy. +Angola,AGO,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income,"April 2013 database update: Based on IMF data, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2002." +Albania,ALB,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income, +Andorra,AND,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Arab World,ARB,,,Arab World aggregate. Arab World is composed of members of the League of Arab States. +United Arab Emirates,ARE,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD,"April 2013 database update: Based on data from the National Bureau of Statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2001 onward; the base year changed to 2007." +Argentina,ARG,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Armenia,ARM,Europe & Central Asia,Lower middle income, +American Samoa,ASM,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income, +Antigua and Barbuda,ATG,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +Australia,AUS,East Asia & Pacific,High income: OECD,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. Value added current series updated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics; data revised from 1990 onward; Australia reports using SNA 2008. +Austria,AUT,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 13.7603 Austrian schilling. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Azerbaijan,AZE,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,April 2012 database update: National accounts historical expenditure series in constant prices were revised in line with State Statistical Committee data that were not previously available. +Burundi,BDI,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Belgium,BEL,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 40.3399 Belgian franc. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Benin,BEN,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Burkina Faso,BFA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Bangladesh,BGD,South Asia,Low income,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +Bulgaria,BGR,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,April 2011 database update: The National Statistical Office revised national accounts data from 1995 onward. GDP in current prices were about 4 percent higher than previous estimates. +Bahrain,BHR,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD, +"Bahamas, The",BHS,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Bosnia and Herzegovina,BIH,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income, +Belarus,BLR,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income, +Belize,BLZ,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Bermuda,BMU,North America,High income: nonOECD, +Bolivia,BOL,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income, +Brazil,BRA,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Barbados,BRB,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Brunei Darussalam,BRN,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD, +Bhutan,BTN,South Asia,Lower middle income,April 2013 database update: Data were updated using the government of Bhutan macroeconomic framework. +Botswana,BWA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income,"Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. Based on official government statistics, national accounts data have been revised from 2006 onward; the new base year is 2006. Data before 2006 were reported on a fiscal year basis." +Sub-Saharan Africa (IFC classification),CAA,,,Sub-Saharan Africa (IFC classification) aggregate. +Central African Republic,CAF,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Canada,CAN,North America,High income: OECD,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +East Asia and the Pacific (IFC classification),CEA,,,East Asia and the Pacific (IFC classification) aggregate. +Europe and Central Asia (IFC classification),CEU,,,Europe and Central Asia (IFC classification) aggregate. +Switzerland,CHE,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Channel Islands,CHI,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Chile,CHL,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: OECD, +China,CHN,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,"On 1 July 1997 China resumed its exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong; and on 20 December 1999 China resumed its exercise of sovereignty over Macao. Unless otherwise noted, data for China do not include data for Hong Kong SAR, China; Macao SAR, China; or Taiwan, China. Based on data from the National Bureau of Statistics, the methodology for national accounts exports and imports of goods and services in constant prices have been revised from 2000 onward." +Côte d'Ivoire,CIV,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income, +Latin America and the Caribbean (IFC classification),CLA,,,Latin America and the Caribbean (IFC classification) aggregate. +Middle East and North Africa (IFC classification),CME,,,Middle East and North Africa (IFC classification) aggregate. +Cameroon,CMR,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income, +"Congo, Dem. Rep.",COD,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"April 2013 database update: Based on IMF data, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2000." +"Congo, Rep.",COG,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"April 2013 database update: Based on IMF data, national accounts data were revised for 1990 onward; the base year changed to 1990." +Colombia,COL,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Comoros,COM,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Cabo Verde,CPV,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"Cabo Verde is the new name for the country previously listed as Cape Verde. Based on official government statistics and IMF data, national accounts data have been revised from 1990 onward; the new base year is 2007." +Costa Rica,CRI,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +South Asia (IFC classification),CSA,,,South Asia (IFC classification) aggregate. +Caribbean small states,CSS,,,"Caribbean small states aggregate. Includes Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Guyana, Suriname, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago." +Cuba,CUB,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Curaçao,CUW,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Cayman Islands,CYM,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Cyprus,CYP,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate entered into force on January 1, 2008: 1 euro = 0.585274 Cyprus pounds. Please note that historical data are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Czech Republic,CZE,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Germany,DEU,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 1.95583 German mark. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Djibouti,DJI,Middle East & North Africa,Lower middle income, +Dominica,DMA,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +Denmark,DNK,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Dominican Republic,DOM,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Algeria,DZA,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income, +East Asia & Pacific,EAP,,,East Asia and Pacific regional aggregate (does not include high-income economies). +East Asia & Pacific (all income levels),EAS,,,East Asia and Pacific regional aggregate (including high-income economies). +Europe & Central Asia,ECA,,,Europe and Central Asia regional aggregate (does not include high-income economies). +Europe & Central Asia (all income levels),ECS,,,Europe and Central Asia regional aggregate (including high-income economies). +Ecuador,ECU,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,National accounts have been revised from 1965 onward based on official government data; the new base year is 2007. The large upward changes are due to an improved calculation method for nominal GDP. +"Egypt, Arab Rep.",EGY,Middle East & North Africa,Lower middle income,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +Euro area,EMU,,,Euro area aggregate. +Eritrea,ERI,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"April 2013 database update: Based on IMF data, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2000." +Spain,ESP,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 166.386 Spanish peseta. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Estonia,EST,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate entered into force on January 1, 2011: 1 euro = 15.6466 Estonian kroon. Please note that historical data are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Ethiopia,ETH,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Fiscal year end: July 7; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. Based on IMF data, national accounts data have been revised for 2000 onward; the new base year is 2011." +European Union,EUU,,,European Union aggregate. +Finland,FIN,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 5.94573 Finnish markka. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Fiji,FJI,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,"Based on data from the Bureau of Statistics, national accounts data on the expenditure side have been revised from 2005 onward; the new base year is 2005." +France,FRA,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 6.55957 French franc. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Faeroe Islands,FRO,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +"Micronesia, Fed. Sts.",FSM,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,"Fiscal year ends on September 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. Based on the Pacific and Virgin Islands Training Initiative, national accounts data have been revised from 2009 onward. In 2010, the government statistical office revised national accounts data for 1995-2008." +Gabon,GAB,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income, +United Kingdom,GBR,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Georgia,GEO,Europe & Central Asia,Lower middle income, +Ghana,GHA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"In 2010, the Ghana Statistical Service revised the base year for Ghana's national accounts series from 1993 to 2006. The new GDP data were about 60 percent higher than previously reported and incorporated improved data sources and methodology." +Guinea,GIN,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +"Gambia, The",GMB,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2004 onward; the base year changed to 2004." +Guinea-Bissau,GNB,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"In 2010, national accounts data for 2003-09 were revised. The new data had broader coverage of all sectors of the economy, and GDP in current prices averaged 89 percent higher than previous estimates." +Equatorial Guinea,GNQ,Sub-Saharan Africa,High income: nonOECD, +Greece,GRC,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 340.75 Greek drachma. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Grenada,GRD,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +Greenland,GRL,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Guatemala,GTM,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income, +Guam,GUM,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD, +Guyana,GUY,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income,"In 2010, the Bureau of Statistics introduced a new series of GDP rebased to year 2006. Current price GDP averaged 63 percent higher than previous estimates." +High income,HIC,,,"High income group aggregate. High-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was $12,616 or more." +"Hong Kong SAR, China",HKG,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD,"On 1 July 1997 China resumed its exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong. Unless otherwise noted, data for China do not include data for Hong Kong SAR, China; Macao SAR, China; or Taiwan, China. Agriculture value added includes mining and quarrying." +Honduras,HND,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income, +Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC),HPC,,,Heavily indebted poor countries aggregate. +Croatia,HRV,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD,"April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, the base year for constant price series changed to 2005." +Haiti,HTI,Latin America & Caribbean,Low income,"Fiscal year end: September 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. In 2010, the government revised national accounts data following changes in the methodology. Current price series since 1991 and constant price series since 1996 were revised." +Hungary,HUN,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, national accounts data were revised for 1991 onward." +Indonesia,IDN,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. Data for Indonesia include Timor-Leste through 1999 unless otherwise noted. +Isle of Man,IMN,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +India,IND,South Asia,Lower middle income,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. April 2013 database update: The India Central Statistical Office revised historical data series both current and constant going back to 1960 with 2004–05 as the base. +Ireland,IRL,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 0.787564 Irish pound. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +"Iran, Islamic Rep.",IRN,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income,Fiscal year end: March 20; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +Iraq,IRQ,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income,National accounts have been revised from 2000 onward based on official government data; the new base year is 1988. The new series raises GDP significantly from previous estimates. +Iceland,ISL,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Israel,ISR,Middle East & North Africa,High income: OECD, +Italy,ITA,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 1936.27 Italian lira. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Jamaica,JAM,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,"April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2002 onward; the base year changed to 2007." +Jordan,JOR,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income, +Japan,JPN,East Asia & Pacific,High income: OECD,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Kazakhstan,KAZ,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income, +Kenya,KEN,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Kyrgyz Republic,KGZ,Europe & Central Asia,Low income, +Cambodia,KHM,East Asia & Pacific,Low income, +Kiribati,KIR,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,"Based on IMF and World Bank data, GDP in current and constant prices have been revised from 2000 onward. Value added components are calculated using shares from the Asian Development Bank." +St. Kitts and Nevis,KNA,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +"Korea, Rep.",KOR,East Asia & Pacific,High income: OECD, +Kosovo,KSV,Europe & Central Asia,Lower middle income,"Kosovo became a World Bank member on June 29, 2009. Since 1999, Kosovo has been a territory under international administration pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999)." +Kuwait,KWT,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Latin America & Caribbean,LAC,,,Latin America and Caribbean regional aggregate (does not include high-income economies). +Lao PDR,LAO,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income, +Lebanon,LBN,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income, +Liberia,LBR,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"April 2013 database update: Based on IMF data, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2000." +Libya,LBY,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income, +St. Lucia,LCA,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +Latin America & Caribbean (all income levels),LCN,,,Latin America and Caribbean regional aggregate (including high-income economies). +Least developed countries: UN classification,LDC,,,Least developed countries (UN classification) aggregate. +Low income,LIC,,,"Low income group aggregate. Low-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was $1,035 or less." +Liechtenstein,LIE,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Sri Lanka,LKA,South Asia,Lower middle income, +Lower middle income,LMC,,,"Lower middle income group aggregate. Lower-middle-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was between $1,036 and $4,085." +Low & middle income,LMY,,,"Low and middle income group aggregate (all developing economies). Low- and middle-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was $12,615 or less." +Lesotho,LSO,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Lithuania,LTU,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Luxembourg,LUX,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 40.3399 Luxembourg franc. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Latvia,LVA,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD,Country joined euro area on 1 January 2014; data in the WDI database are reported in lats. +"Macao SAR, China",MAC,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD,"On 20 December 1999 China resumed its exercise of sovereignty over Macao. Unless otherwise noted, data for China do not include data for Hong Kong SAR, China; Macao SAR, China; or Taiwan, China." +St. Martin (French part),MAF,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Morocco,MAR,Middle East & North Africa,Lower middle income, +Monaco,MCO,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Moldova,MDA,Europe & Central Asia,Lower middle income, +Madagascar,MDG,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Maldives,MDV,South Asia,Upper middle income,April 2012 database update: The Department of National Planning revised national accounts data for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2003. +Middle East & North Africa (all income levels),MEA,,,Middle East and North Africa regional aggregate (including high-income economies). +Mexico,MEX,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,The new base year is 2008. +Marshall Islands,MHL,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,Fiscal year ends on September 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +Middle income,MIC,,,"Middle income group aggregate. Middle-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was between $1,036 and $12,615." +"Macedonia, FYR",MKD,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on official statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2003 onward." +Mali,MLI,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Malta,MLT,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate entered into force on January 1, 2008: 1 euro = 0.4293 Maltese lira. Please note that historical data are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Myanmar,MMR,East Asia & Pacific,Low income,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +Middle East & North Africa,MNA,,,Middle East and North Africa regional aggregate (does not include high-income economies). +Montenegro,MNE,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,"Montenegro declared independence from Serbia and Montenegro on June 3, 2006. Where available, data for each country are shown separately. However, for Serbia, some indicators continue to include data for Montenegro through 2005." +Mongolia,MNG,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income, +Northern Mariana Islands,MNP,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD, +Mozambique,MOZ,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Mauritania,MRT,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, data were revised for 1991 onward; the base year for constant price series changed to 2004." +Mauritius,MUS,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income, +Malawi,MWI,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. Based on IMF data, national accounts data have been revised for 2000 onward; the new base year is 2009." +Malaysia,MYS,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,"Based on official government statistics, value added in services in constant and current prices have been revised from 1990 onward. National accounts data in constant prices have been linked back to 1960; the new base year is 2005." +North America,NAC,,,North America regional aggregate. There are no economies in North America classified as low or middle income. +Namibia,NAM,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income,"Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. In 2010, the Central Bureau of Statistics revised national accounts data for 2000-07. An expanded data survey resulted in a substantial upward adjustment to estimates of output, particularly in mining, services, and manufacturing. The constant price series were rebased from 1995 to 2004 prices. GDP in current prices averaged 14 percent higher than previous estimates." +New Caledonia,NCL,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD, +Niger,NER,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Based on official government statistics, national accounts data have been revised from 2006 onward; the new base year is 2006." +Nigeria,NGA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"Based on official government statistics released 6 April, 2014, national accounts data have been revised from 2010 onward; the new base year is 2010. The new GDP data are 60 to 75 percent higher than previously reported and incorporate improved data sources and methodology." +Nicaragua,NIC,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income,"April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 1994 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +Netherlands,NLD,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 2.20371 Netherlands guilder. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +High income: nonOECD,NOC,,,"High income nonOECD aggregate. High-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was $12,616 or more." +Norway,NOR,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Nepal,NPL,South Asia,Low income,Fiscal year end: July 14; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +New Zealand,NZL,East Asia & Pacific,High income: OECD,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. +High income: OECD,OEC,,,"High income OECD members aggregate. High-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was $12,616 or more." +OECD members,OED,,,"OECD members aggregate (all, including developing countries)." +Oman,OMN,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD, +Other small states,OSS,,,"Other small states aggregate. Includes Bhutan, Botswana, Cabo Verde, Comoros, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, The Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Maldives, Mauritius, Montenegro, Namibia, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Swaziland, and Timor-Leste." +Pakistan,PAK,South Asia,Lower middle income,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. The new base year is 2005/06. +Panama,PAN,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Peru,PER,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Philippines,PHL,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,"April 2012 database update: National accounts data were revised for 1998 onward. Because intellectual property products are now reported as a part of gross fixed capital formation, gross domestic product (GDP) in current prices averaged 4 percent higher than previous estimates." +Palau,PLW,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,Fiscal year ends on September 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. Base year has changed to 2005. Source: Pacific and Virgin Islands Training Initiative at www.econmap.org. +Papua New Guinea,PNG,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income, +Poland,POL,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD, +Puerto Rico,PRI,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD,"Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. April 2012 database update: Based on data from the Instituto de Estadísticas de Puerto Rico, national accounts data were revised for 2001 onward." +"Korea, Dem. Rep.",PRK,East Asia & Pacific,Low income, +Portugal,PRT,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate was adopted by the EU Council on January 1, 1999: 1 euro = 200.482 Portuguese escudo. Please note that historical data before 1999 are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Paraguay,PRY,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income,"National accounts data have been revised from 1960 onward. The methodology and base year have not changed but the output of two hydroelectric plants (shared with neighboring countries) has been added raising GDP from previous estimates. On the supply side, it was added in ""gas, electricity and water."" On the demand side changes were mainly to exports, but also for imports, investment and consumption. National accounts price valuations for 1991 to 2012 have also been corrected and changed from VAP to VAB." +West Bank and Gaza,PSE,Middle East & North Africa,Lower middle income, +Pacific island small states,PSS,,,"Pacific island small states aggregate. Includes Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu." +French Polynesia,PYF,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD, +Qatar,QAT,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD, +Romania,ROU,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,National accounts have been revised based on data from the National Statistical Institute; the new base year is 2000. +Russian Federation,RUS,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Rwanda,RWA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 1999 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +South Asia,SAS,,,South Asia regional aggregate. There are no economies in South Asia classified as high income. +Saudi Arabia,SAU,Middle East & North Africa,High income: nonOECD, +Sudan,SDN,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"Total population data are reported separately for Sudan and South Sudan; see specific notes for other demographic-related series. National accounts data exclude South Sudan after July 9, 2011. Other data reported for Sudan include South Sudan unless otherwise noted." +Senegal,SEN,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income, +Singapore,SGP,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. Country reports using a blend of SNA 1993 and SNA 2008. April 2012 database update: National accounts time series were replaced with official government statistics. +Solomon Islands,SLB,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income, +Sierra Leone,SLE,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 1990 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +El Salvador,SLV,Latin America & Caribbean,Lower middle income, +San Marino,SMR,Europe & Central Asia,High income: nonOECD, +Somalia,SOM,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Serbia,SRB,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,"Montenegro declared independence from Serbia and Montenegro on June 3, 2006. Where available, data for each country are shown separately. However, for Serbia, some indicators, such as those series for which data appear only for Serbia and not Montenegro--e.g., aid, environment, external debt, balance of payments, various social indicators excluding population--continue to include data for Montenegro through 2005. Moreover, data from 1999 onward for Serbia for most indicators exclude data for Kosovo, 1999 being the year when Kosovo became a territory under international administration pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999); any exceptions are noted. Kosovo became a World Bank member on June 29, 2009; available data are shown separately for Kosovo. In 2011, the Statistical Office of Serbia improved the methodology of national accounts data for 2003 onward. Specifically, the classification of sectors was revised, and GDP is now calculated using chain linked volumes in 2005 prices." +Sub-Saharan Africa,SSA,,,Sub-Saharan Africa regional aggregate (does not include high-income economies). +South Sudan,SSD,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"South Sudan declared its independence on July 9, 2011. Data are shown separately for South Sudan where available. However, data reported for Sudan include South Sudan unless otherwise noted. Though limited data are available in the WDI database for South Sudan, additional data are available from South Sudan's National Bureau of Statistics (http://ssnbs.org/)." +Sub-Saharan Africa (all income levels),SSF,,,Sub-Saharan Africa regional aggregate (including high-income economies). +Small states,SST,,,"Small states aggregate. Includes 41 members of the Small States Forum. (Does not include the high-income countries Bahrain, Brunei Darussalam, Cyprus, Estonia, Iceland, Malta, Qatar, and San Marino.)" +São Tomé and Principe,STP,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income, +Suriname,SUR,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Slovak Republic,SVK,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate entered into force on January 1, 2009: 1 euro = 30.126 Slovak koruna. Please note that historical data are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Slovenia,SVN,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,"A simple multiplier is used to convert the national currencies of EMU members to euros. The following irrevocable euro conversion rate entered into force on January 1, 2007: 1 euro = 239.64 Slovenian tolar. Please note that historical data are not actual euros and are not comparable or suitable for aggregation across countries." +Sweden,SWE,Europe & Central Asia,High income: OECD,Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Swaziland,SWZ,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. In 2011, the Central Statistical Office revised national accounts data for 1990 onward." +Sint Maarten (Dutch part),SXM,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Seychelles,SYC,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income,"April 2013 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 1976 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +Syrian Arab Republic,SYR,Middle East & North Africa,Lower middle income,"April 2013 database update: Based on data from the Central Bureau of Statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2003 onward." +Turks and Caicos Islands,TCA,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Chad,TCD,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Based on IMF data, national accounts data have been revised for 2005 onward; the new base year is 2005." +Togo,TGO,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"April 2013 database update: Based on IMF data, national accounts data have been revised for 2000; the new base year is 2000." +Thailand,THA,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,Fiscal year end: September 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Tajikistan,TJK,Europe & Central Asia,Low income, +Turkmenistan,TKM,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income,"On January 1, 2009, the Turkmen manat was redenominated (1 new manat = 5,000 old manats)." +Timor-Leste,TLS,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,"Based on official government statistics, national account data have been revised, and value added is measured at basic prices; the new base year is 2010." +Tonga,TON,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,"Fiscal year ends on June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. April 2013 database update: Based on data from the National Bureau of Statistics, national accounts data were revised; the base year changed to 2010/11." +Trinidad and Tobago,TTO,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Tunisia,TUN,Middle East & North Africa,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on data from the Central Bank and its Statistical Bulletin, national accounts data were revised for 1997 onward." +Turkey,TUR,Europe & Central Asia,Upper middle income, +Tuvalu,TUV,East Asia & Pacific,Upper middle income,"Based on data from the IMF, World Bank and government official statistics, national accounts data have been revised from 2006 onward. Value added is measured at producer prices up to 1999 and at basic prices from 2000 onward." +Tanzania,TZA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income, +Uganda,UGA,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. In 2011, the Bureau of Statistics revised national accounts series for 1998 onward; the base year for constant price series changed to 2001/02." +Ukraine,UKR,Europe & Central Asia,Lower middle income, +Upper middle income,UMC,,,"Upper middle income group aggregate. Upper-middle-income economies are those in which 2012 GNI per capita was between $4,086 and $12,615." +Uruguay,URY,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD,"In 2011, the Central Bank revised national accounts data for 2006 onward." +United States,USA,North America,High income: OECD,Fiscal year end: September 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Uzbekistan,UZB,Europe & Central Asia,Lower middle income, +St. Vincent and the Grenadines,VCT,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income,"April 2012 database update: Based on official government statistics, national accounts data were revised for 2000 onward; the base year changed to 2006." +"Venezuela, RB",VEN,Latin America & Caribbean,Upper middle income, +Virgin Islands (U.S.),VIR,Latin America & Caribbean,High income: nonOECD, +Vietnam,VNM,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,"Based on data from the Vietnam Statistics Office, national accounts data have been revised from 2000 onward; the new base year is 2010." +Vanuatu,VUT,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,"Based on official government statistics, value added is measured at producer prices through 1997 and at basic prices from 1998 onward." +World,WLD,,,World aggregate. +Samoa,WSM,East Asia & Pacific,Lower middle income,Fiscal year ends on June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: FY. Data are revised from Samoa Bureau of Statistics and Central Bank of Samoa. +"Yemen, Rep.",YEM,Middle East & North Africa,Lower middle income,"Based on official government statistics and International Monetary Fund data, national accounts data have been revised for 1990 onward." +South Africa,ZAF,Sub-Saharan Africa,Upper middle income,Fiscal year end: March 31; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. +Zambia,ZMB,Sub-Saharan Africa,Lower middle income,"National accounts data have rebased to reflect the January 1, 2013, introduction of the new Zambian kwacha at a rate of 1,000 old kwacha = 1 new kwacha." +Zimbabwe,ZWE,Sub-Saharan Africa,Low income,"Fiscal year end: June 30; reporting period for national accounts data: CY. As of January 2009, multiple hard currencies, such as rand, pound sterling, euro and U.S. dollar are in use. Data are reported in U.S. dollars, the most-used currency." +Taiwan,TWN,East Asia & Pacific,High income: nonOECD,Manually added diff --git a/data/gitr2014.csv b/data/gitr2014.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f72f25 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/gitr2014.csv @@ -0,0 +1,31107 @@ +Edition,Entity_code,Entity,GLOBAL_ID,Series_with_units,Rank,Value,Date_description,Note,Source,Source_date +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),119,3.7815193906,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),62,4.7548737774,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),11,5.8835722131,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),134,3.2759845263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),76,4.5247064087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),28,5.4060163923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),41,5.1971859968,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),30,5.3548280747,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),135,3.1413753391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),51,4.9329881389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),58,4.8365243,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),75,4.5521729873,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),49,4.9645644981,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),112,3.929399322,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),7,6.0035651158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),127,3.55588,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),136,3.106701,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),131,3.3694000896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),67,4.6663270079,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),29,5.3691351066,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),37,5.2640477277,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),61,4.795638011,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),38,5.2370345266,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),17,5.5603832809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),57,4.8610466981,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),18,5.5573882003,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),88,4.3834039699,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),104,4.1349355532,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),83,4.4593098395,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),26,5.4381950116,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),85,4.4370096255,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),82,4.4727168345,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),105,4.0630883636,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),36,5.2914827399,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),22,5.4831143176,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),74,4.6013261423,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),123,3.6697622783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),117,3.8512789786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),71,4.6278146735,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),94,4.2349920768,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),13,5.7446511083,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),77,4.5137767167,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),10,5.8888362529,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),43,5.1235576068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),16,5.5672831538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),78,4.5134701048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),87,4.3850128343,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),25,5.4445132994,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),106,4.0405415199,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),133,3.350802025,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),59,4.8187154529,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),24,5.4622245548,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),116,3.8538800276,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),99,4.18608155,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),140,2.897622,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),89,4.3508324931,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),80,4.48534845,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),42,5.1254114558,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),63,4.7413863918,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),97,4.2024971117,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),40,5.2123943562,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),32,5.3341334623,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),120,3.7777259582,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),55,4.8706737458,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),47,5.0428209397,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),44,5.1205586644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),50,4.93564,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),69,4.639702022,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),126,3.5796218601,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),60,4.7964862492,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),15,5.6960355778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),114,3.8770949245,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),142,2.6422909037,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),20,5.520154331,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),130,3.4261207626,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),70,4.6378809984,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),5,6.0502739807,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),98,4.1877820172,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),73,4.604265,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),86,4.4123855803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),125,3.5828239189,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),96,4.2170941629,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),52,4.9037633309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),54,4.8927350262,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),4,6.0844792,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),64,4.7393418306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),53,4.8928802364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),66,4.6849838678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),129,3.4919416031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),35,5.2975820411,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),102,4.1607906333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),9,5.9098183868,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),56,4.868871159,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),111,3.9619534024,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),137,3.1014971932,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),45,5.1191022065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),34,5.322017805,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),124,3.646044715,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),27,5.4132477904,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),19,5.5468556719,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),103,4.1413834408,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),48,5.0424306157,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),101,4.1661182287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),100,4.1755603371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),115,3.8561236939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),84,4.4509780655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),12,5.8501703707,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),141,2.8765480863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),8,5.950193,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),128,3.5463792412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),65,4.6858662108,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),3,6.0926396658,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),14,5.709417,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),23,5.470596433,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),1,6.3281544788,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),132,3.3659743143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),92,4.2646341714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),109,3.995366,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),113,3.9164627286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),72,4.621267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),2,6.1055317522,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),138,2.9847637421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),95,4.2216065143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),122,3.6804522321,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),93,4.23970495,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),79,4.5088746412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),107,4.0154715115,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),91,4.3106003381,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),21,5.4894981692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),46,5.0838808633,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),6,6.0372115556,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),108,4.0004030764,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),68,4.647534989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),118,3.80825675,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),39,5.2183032888,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),31,5.3476214243,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),121,3.7632414988,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),33,5.32352714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),139,2.931713,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),90,4.34773385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),81,4.4821679629,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ075,(DISCONTINUED) Government prioritization of ICT (1-7),110,3.9936179333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),140,3.3991094188,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),74,4.9240215878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),36,5.5262779963,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),85,4.7746138421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),113,4.262732087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),16,5.9757474923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),18,5.9422581968,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),106,4.4677292265,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),136,3.6590488,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),26,5.8028141083,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),114,4.2355485321,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),124,4.0408121468,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),117,4.2087037962,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),52,5.2098482909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),40,5.4710187766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),108,4.427772,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),81,4.823983,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),128,3.9261620657,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),29,5.7305847745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),39,5.49067135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),57,5.1116201223,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),97,4.5503603725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),10,6.0596317181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),12,6.0511451148,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),38,5.5003729811,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),49,5.2627364801,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),130,3.8875045109,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),94,4.5760510883,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),67,4.994334975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),98,4.5501792243,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),51,5.242704817,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),64,5.0186430577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),23,5.9055642026,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),28,5.7584316344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),6,6.2366846971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),84,4.7764116485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),141,3.1275636087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),105,4.4823655939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),96,4.5641933951,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),61,5.0383145696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),3,6.3411256083,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),138,3.6070639646,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),14,6.0165995397,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),22,5.9056365764,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),4,6.3236063846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),92,4.6499141957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),103,4.5004947166,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),99,4.540566905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),95,4.575542279,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),47,5.2911695875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),80,4.8553598059,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),21,5.9241294258,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),69,4.9621940707,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),54,5.19165345,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),121,4.145942,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),60,5.0404503939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),77,4.87593435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),56,5.1310176786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),32,5.648523934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),125,4.0015404944,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),5,6.239907346,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),25,5.8055185348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),71,4.9534841077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),66,5.0073747975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),76,4.8945887032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),13,6.0350058192,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),44,5.327327,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),70,4.9577253683,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),120,4.1735903646,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),86,4.7616369603,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),2,6.3906987111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),91,4.6605295934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),90,4.6812598112,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),37,5.525492069,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),123,4.073410522,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),7,6.1692897159,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),30,5.7147389349,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),43,5.4339460732,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),102,4.514471,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),109,4.4268082732,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),131,3.8800334645,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),62,5.0221317094,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),101,4.5192462418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),133,3.8213654242,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),24,5.8453381556,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),68,4.9657584223,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),93,4.6366549727,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),104,4.484461741,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),139,3.5217568137,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),75,4.9114015458,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),115,4.2309625867,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),27,5.759171865,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),83,4.7927157846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),107,4.4562089068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),129,3.9137691244,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),15,5.9946600935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),11,6.0547071832,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),122,4.08805572,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),17,5.9555238128,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),42,5.4475373229,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),111,4.3040275454,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),41,5.4603869153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),88,4.7054893989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),89,4.7049931143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),48,5.280589489,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),33,5.6364723939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),34,5.5414577276,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),112,4.2672626151,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),19,5.93293,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),79,4.8556463155,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),73,4.9413857959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),78,4.8616782575,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),45,5.304504,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),50,5.2598799183,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),20,5.9321429292,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),65,5.0154026214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),134,3.7917611043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),100,4.5309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),31,5.6742390929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),35,5.537554,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),1,6.4768938739,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),127,3.9478545684,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),132,3.8498752582,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),142,2.8796683671,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),58,5.0703822518,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),119,4.1856024533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),126,4.0003812295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),72,4.9502202143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),82,4.8183475045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),55,5.1374283916,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),9,6.0692097835,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),135,3.7677383371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),110,4.3767262066,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),59,5.05492245,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),63,5.0199035354,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),8,6.0716364448,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),116,4.2206160795,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),53,5.19578996,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),137,3.643252,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),46,5.29743005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),87,4.73680772,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ083,(DISCONTINUED) Extent of business Internet use (1-7),118,4.1960005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2012,AGO,Angola,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.0714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ALB,Albania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",91,0.1053,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1053,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",56,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.2895,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",52,0.2895,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AUS,Australia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",2,0.9143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7632,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AUT,Austria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.5,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.3684,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.3684,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",17,0.5857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BEN,Benin,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.0714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.1579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.6714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.6579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.6579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",56,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.2857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.5,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.5,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.4737,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.4737,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CAN,Canada,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",56,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",43,0.3421,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.3421,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CHL,Chile,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.3429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.6579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.6579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CHN,China,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.3714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",73,0.1571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,COL,Colombia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",26,0.4429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",58,0.2368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.2368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",56,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",46,0.3158,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.3158,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",23,0.4857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",54,0.2632,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.2632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DEU,Germany,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",14,0.6143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7632,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.6429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.5526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.5526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.1857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.4737,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.4737,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.0526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.0526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",73,0.1571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",58,0.2368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.2368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.2857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ESP,Spain,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",3,0.8286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.5,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.5,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,EST,Estonia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.6857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7632,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",43,0.3421,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.3421,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,FIN,Finland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",30,0.4143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,FRA,France,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.5789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.5789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",91,0.1053,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1053,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",4,0.7714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.9211,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.9211,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.0857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",91,0.1053,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1053,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GRC,Greece,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.2571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",43,0.3421,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.3421,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.3143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",58,0.2368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.2368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.0857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,,,, +2014,GUY,Guyana,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,HND,Honduras,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.4571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.2895,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",52,0.2895,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.0227,2008,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.3143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.4474,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.4474,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IND,India,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",56,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IND,India,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.1842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IND,India,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",71,0.1842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",26,0.4429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.0714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.1842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",71,0.1842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.1579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ISR,Israel,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",30,0.4143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",7,0.8947,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",7,0.8947,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ITA,Italy,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.2143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",54,0.2632,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.2632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.0857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.2857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",91,0.1053,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1053,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,JPN,Japan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",6,0.7571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.7368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",18,0.5571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",3,0.9474,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",3,0.9474,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.2286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.0526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.0526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.4286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.2895,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",52,0.2895,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.1143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.2286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.1842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",71,0.1842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.2714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",46,0.3158,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.3158,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LBY,Libya,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,,,, +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.0857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.5286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",30,0.5263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",30,0.5263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3947,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3947,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.2714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",56,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3947,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3947,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.3714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.5789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.5789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.2143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MLI,Mali,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.1143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MLT,Malta,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.3429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",54,0.2632,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.2632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",73,0.1571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",46,0.3158,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.3158,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.4286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.6053,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.6053,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.1143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.1143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.0227,2008,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",12,0.6571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.5,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.5,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.1842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",71,0.1842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NOR,Norway,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.5,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",4,0.7714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.5789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",25,0.5789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,OMN,Oman,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",73,0.1571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.4474,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.4474,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PAN,Panama,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1136,2008,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",46,0.3158,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.3158,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PER,Peru,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3947,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3947,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.1857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,POL,Poland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",50,0.2429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.1842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",71,0.1842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,PRT,Portugal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.2714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.3684,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.3684,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.1579,,,, +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",22,0.6316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",22,0.6316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ROU,Romania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.1857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.6579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.6579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0.0286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",22,0.6316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",22,0.6316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.6857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",3,0.9474,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",3,0.9474,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.0526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.0526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.0714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.5526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.5526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",58,0.2368,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.2368,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",138,0,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.0714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.1316,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.1316,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",20,0.5143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.2105,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.2105,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",23,0.4857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1136,2008,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.0526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.0526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SYR,Syria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TCD,Chad,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,THA,Thailand,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.0857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",46,0.3158,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.3158,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0.0286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",129,0.0143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.1286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.3,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.3684,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.2143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.0526,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.0526,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.0714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.0789,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.0789,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.2571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.1579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.2571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.1842,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",71,0.1842,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,USA,United States,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",6,0.7571,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.9211,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.9211,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",54,0.2632,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.2632,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.0857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",91,0.1053,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.1053,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.0429,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",62,0.1857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.1579,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.1579,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",138,0,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0.0286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",111,0.0263,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EPARTICIPIDX,"10.04 E-Participation Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.0263,2012,0,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),131,2.9510101031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),138,2.939394,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),59,4.4032733409,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),65,4.2796749625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),82,4.03594205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),4,5.7949380935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),3,5.8783103675,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),2,6.008697,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),125,3.2356995263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),126,3.2085124595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),140,2.9000878946,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),91,3.8176390373,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),49,4.5017305061,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),24,4.9641906359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),44,4.6162392077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),46,4.5794334286,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),51,4.528043616,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),12,5.505094181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),14,5.3193938993,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),22,5.1068815956,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),47,4.5486160048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),19,5.1616245424,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),11,5.4172383111,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),134,2.7529421478,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),140,2.6165415491,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),146,2.6387457802,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),58,4.4037317167,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),50,4.4925029523,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),52,4.471489445,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),109,3.5930732179,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),112,3.5367747615,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),127,3.1540696827,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),79,4.0734096861,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),79,4.0935802469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),69,4.123733098,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),104,3.6453018823,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),104,3.6601310452,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),107,3.5933855822,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),92,3.7971846564,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),98,3.7654066634,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),100,3.6911392657,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),8,5.5700184,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),6,5.557857469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),13,5.375990566,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),120,3.346384,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),96,3.80889275,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),64,4.187309,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),133,2.815299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),117,3.4191122284,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),123,3.359329955,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),115,3.4384273836,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),42,4.6505584731,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),53,4.433827079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),61,4.2206219797,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),52,4.4770688513,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),47,4.5368951349,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),60,4.278238722,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),50,4.5273760663,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),45,4.6171466296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),39,4.7753604359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),43,4.686476,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),63,4.2847688679,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),70,4.2136686433,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),78,4.0750522311,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),30,4.922373367,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),32,4.9013085403,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),32,4.8334700381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),20,5.2678152622,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),21,5.1411624142,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),23,4.98345118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),15,5.4084586189,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),18,5.1706609098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),28,4.8622172875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),31,4.909077697,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),39,4.6895450761,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),47,4.6351328333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),118,3.3756860528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),108,3.5846296196,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),112,3.5168445988,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),116,3.4615470377,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),91,3.8735006828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),77,4.075883579,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),51,4.5041674181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),73,4.197589987,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),68,4.1455855592,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),27,5.0853234243,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),29,4.9695215058,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),42,4.722545083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),74,4.1250459745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),87,4.0417004539,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),76,4.0807596206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),49,4.5384026474,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),62,4.3126570006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),66,4.1770238366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),82,4.0333097532,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),88,4.0141360481,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),101,3.6425263709,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),46,4.5617926577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),44,4.6433703356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),33,4.8167105222,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),19,5.2689340309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),26,5.0171152311,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),34,4.8098180385,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),57,4.4110912763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),60,4.3301259655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),74,4.0943342905,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),137,2.6259682435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),144,2.296213725,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),141,2.8528042306,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),77,4.1011511827,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),72,4.203905,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),55,4.4073844135,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),87,3.9484348373,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),94,3.8410055887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),96,3.7121949594,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),55,4.4349338982,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),48,4.5072900284,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),49,4.538192,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),9,5.5684341583,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),10,5.4693050399,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),5,5.6273000249,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),81,4.0569099125,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),90,3.89678535,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),92,3.8044336,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),21,5.2352419794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),15,5.3164137739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),14,5.3645351579,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),26,5.0931114456,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),28,4.9724400958,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),40,4.7728329713,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),130,3.19246,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),120,3.3670326729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),29,4.9405436923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),17,5.1774204231,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),27,4.8642506136,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),40,4.7081578638,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),36,4.732894,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),41,4.7304664225,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),110,3.5849516225,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),95,3.8240959583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),86,3.9761894477,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),129,3.193982,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),126,3.1705500207,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),43,4.6321863017,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),42,4.680895814,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),48,4.588337146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),96,3.7762064352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),122,3.4122850048,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),124,3.2168626977,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),101,3.6930299625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),102,3.700615882,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),108,3.5309532964,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),86,3.9686844882,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),81,4.0874760902,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),75,4.0942110403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),17,5.3270707677,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),22,5.129706325,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),17,5.2397299186,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),94,3.7962557746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),109,3.5618132667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),134,2.9868797206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),115,3.48712945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),117,3.4923245397,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),94,3.7346933011,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),139,2.601257,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),142,2.4670823268,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),145,2.7055530386,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),84,3.9707692908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),80,4.0882613895,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),87,3.9348729723,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),69,4.20047415,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),82,4.0749669897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),73,4.09864968,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),53,4.4759990707,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),54,4.4334973568,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),53,4.4399359275,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),39,4.7336385093,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),43,4.6504657928,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),46,4.6355310462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),78,4.0890533245,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),61,4.3185739295,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),70,4.1213737591,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),18,5.285657927,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),27,4.9890782276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),38,4.793715681,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),25,5.0985039181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),30,4.9267488337,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),31,4.8389464351,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),88,3.9278544923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),92,3.8705176425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),113,3.5078296523,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),64,4.27015045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),66,4.2759550984,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),81,4.0371289037,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),48,4.5408745238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),37,4.7230772952,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),26,4.871698,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),66,4.2217514485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),58,4.3813039417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),37,4.7972811212,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),68,4.212106,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),35,4.7596688978,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),30,4.8463677429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),56,4.4131339195,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),55,4.4154582111,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),57,4.3695129736,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),135,2.7469252865,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),136,2.76303765,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),144,2.7089409525,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),80,4.0575050827,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),76,4.1018867525,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),99,3.6984452941,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),6,5.6845587111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),5,5.6693410667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),8,5.5277082894,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),102,3.6886133009,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),115,3.4938697195,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),111,3.5197404,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),56,4.37619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),140,2.5318852888,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),143,2.3440523814,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),148,2.317127574,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),84,4.056818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),106,3.6069540243,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),135,2.834161,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),147,2.3667482,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),37,4.7760899448,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),31,4.913618,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),25,4.9276175049,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),130,2.9880798943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),134,2.953089597,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),139,2.9037014376,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),33,4.8346251968,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),33,4.8820890785,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),35,4.8090703694,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),23,5.1405625157,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),16,5.2137934625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),16,5.2760225706,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),98,3.758915951,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),85,4.0484045708,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),63,4.212029241,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),83,4.00124,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),77,4.1017650149,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),85,3.9889770557,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),114,3.4926525014,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),100,3.7343827091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),90,3.8648299692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),128,3.0485449556,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),128,3.1977223798,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),117,3.4308625365,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),62,4.32237395,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),57,4.3912017168,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),65,4.1819907532,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),76,4.1134316459,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),63,4.2879293735,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),36,4.8047171936,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),60,4.3738669619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),75,4.1179414156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),72,4.1082395878,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),7,5.6455883222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),4,5.7836176545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),6,5.58292954,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),133,3.013986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),38,4.7384672465,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),40,4.6840978026,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),50,4.5355936649,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),75,4.1227581273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),68,4.2395580568,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),89,3.8797300497,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),90,3.8847208355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),106,3.6050353931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),114,3.4526805208,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),124,3.2759089435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),124,3.3588026464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),142,2.8481416765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),54,4.4481533607,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),56,4.4091580441,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),54,4.4157004833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),93,3.7962916467,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),120,3.432077408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),122,3.2606609483,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),10,5.5488668477,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),8,5.5525927325,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),9,5.4911646703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),121,3.3248219846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),132,3.1159452299,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),129,3.1287852807,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),95,3.7935505478,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),89,3.9075712897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),97,3.7044053718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),132,2.8516890261,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),125,3.2699170265,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),110,3.5214605877,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),28,5.0086162355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),23,5.1164492012,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),20,5.133600226,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),22,5.186117642,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),25,5.0501705648,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),21,5.1278426203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),127,3.199705685,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),127,3.2065908462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),135,2.9704596,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),24,5.1034866181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),24,5.1101131575,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),19,5.1407920543,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),16,5.3439240534,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),20,5.1452392108,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),18,5.239323,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),105,3.6451862667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),121,3.4158039042,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),121,3.2728753667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),45,4.5893294996,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),38,4.7212727378,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),29,4.8503702213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),72,4.1415458322,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),99,3.7565617579,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),102,3.6415904191,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),103,3.6608942686,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),83,4.0746835733,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),71,4.1155475956,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),111,3.5114365758,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),114,3.5099627946,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),119,3.3828812464,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),73,4.1333380189,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),52,4.4579576216,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),58,4.3131185469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),11,5.5465188109,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),12,5.4439963363,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),15,5.2804257581,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),119,3.3720623091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),119,3.4494825069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),130,3.1153472145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),2,5.997151,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),2,5.9856374121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),3,5.9617592118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),122,3.3169996639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),107,3.596617325,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),103,3.6313975015,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),97,3.7593220675,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),110,3.5607914939,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),93,3.8012509873,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),14,5.4535083562,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),13,5.387947,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),4,5.6727004545,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),13,5.459813,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),7,5.5539594615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),7,5.5309501786,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),35,4.8084733665,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),51,4.472650375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),88,3.9191717458,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),1,6.1357863584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),1,6.1131561333,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),1,6.0530274024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),118,3.489933,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),105,3.61443485,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),108,3.6091498071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),113,3.5241662129,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),116,3.4383014308,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),112,3.5060272646,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),111,3.55734795,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),109,3.5251593397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),141,2.45154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),141,2.5596283915,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),143,2.8122362471,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),106,3.6385337,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),93,3.8424336863,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),118,3.4037965077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),61,4.342506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),71,4.207590737,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),83,4.0272667413,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),3,5.878396042,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),11,5.4672847596,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),10,5.4657993885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),138,2.6241185053,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),139,2.7076656923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),125,3.2091828048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),67,4.272367,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),59,4.2874554952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),123,3.2998359888,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),129,3.0447057704,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),131,3.1918351509,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),131,3.0398753609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),71,4.1608582763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),74,4.1333428038,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),79,4.0699701118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),65,4.256717797,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),59,4.3519659914,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),113,3.4972880361,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),105,3.6255409106,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),123,3.2317076667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),100,3.7068582095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),101,3.703198385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),98,3.7034310534,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),36,4.7866153333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),80,4.0386810964,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),34,4.8148671819,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),34,4.8737380915,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),44,4.6651906464,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),5,5.6849324947,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),9,5.5203012348,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),12,5.3989105986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),99,3.7212418921,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),103,3.694863022,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),95,3.7318799545,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),70,4.1999876352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),69,4.2147006674,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),84,3.995434577,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),107,3.6241779,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),116,3.493632739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),128,3.1536516281,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),41,4.7017951957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),64,4.2835035939,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),91,3.8585141665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),32,4.8552221967,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),41,4.6822192928,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),45,4.6413241558,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),126,3.2352800867,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),133,3.0234067571,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),137,2.9504690516,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),67,4.21240444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),86,4.04213295,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),67,4.1686654732,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),142,2.278357,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),138,2.7194696476,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),136,2.968194156,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),89,3.9232751,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),97,3.7742302206,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),104,3.6201602196,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),85,3.9693257914,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),78,4.0957056659,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),62,4.2188781922,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),136,2.6270426333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),137,2.7361332667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ080,10.03 ICT use and government efficiency (1-7),132,3.025054476,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),140,1.5913606141,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),127,2.636364,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),57,4.4218135744,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),54,4.5045130906,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),73,4.18815945,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),29,5.6670212607,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),22,5.8145485892,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),21,5.847399,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),106,3.2571043158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),87,3.7059297838,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),79,4.0352632647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),92,3.5552748994,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),78,3.8817326644,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),78,4.0453937179,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),19,5.9172005385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),12,6.0535068857,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),17,5.949620216,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),18,5.9255989746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),25,5.7351348848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),25,5.7202017382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),88,3.7496083253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),79,3.8754938754,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),72,4.1934049667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),142,1.3397514174,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),143,1.5366368012,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),144,1.7875909663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),20,5.8948293778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),28,5.6593282702,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),26,5.6817583136,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),105,3.2778331857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),127,2.4816006,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),140,2.0349420712,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),137,1.8807075203,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),141,1.6790060494,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),147,1.6387551684,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),128,2.5008144949,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),122,2.6464557452,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),122,2.8447406038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),47,4.7858434722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),50,4.6744644854,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),51,4.7152015254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),32,5.3857559942,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),35,5.2502285103,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),45,4.9706476208,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),81,3.829551,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),71,4.19467895,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),61,4.49342,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),91,3.587947,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),113,3.1506454209,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),100,3.4411061305,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),100,3.5288491425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),86,3.7697945031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),88,3.6721408466,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),98,3.6000964378,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),30,5.4502830816,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),33,5.3169180752,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),38,5.1106649122,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),37,5.0693351851,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),34,5.283192463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),32,5.4779844564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),88,3.839282,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),93,3.5309322624,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),96,3.5136502464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),104,3.4263794587,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),15,6.0586324745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),13,6.0531083294,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),11,6.1334265322,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),9,6.2197860794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),6,6.2026281574,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),12,6.10878938,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),45,4.8102861811,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),48,4.6999034549,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),48,4.852955675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),28,5.6906018863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),31,5.3956439047,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),35,5.3158912857,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),134,2.1611835052,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),138,1.8246041946,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),134,2.325828563,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),131,2.4320240045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),130,2.3835470069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),135,2.3144965175,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),68,4.0877062602,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),76,4.0199442891,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),82,3.920179798,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),96,3.4294603048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),90,3.6457878466,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),91,3.7500700468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),66,4.1862503106,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),58,4.4580849523,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),58,4.5760011422,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),38,4.9713793649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),36,5.209754809,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),30,5.6107254986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),21,5.8486899195,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),21,5.8333143149,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),24,5.7926295488,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),41,4.8579837656,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),45,4.8453717486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),42,5.0265907855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),8,6.2331712574,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),19,5.9093277547,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),22,5.8364867967,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),103,3.3342054557,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),102,3.3865530759,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),99,3.5728159905,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),125,2.6306408696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),132,2.3560662167,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),138,2.1706572663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),108,3.2475950082,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),98,3.48201,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),80,4.0181191294,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),107,3.2561290417,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),116,3.0229170892,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),125,2.7026132602,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),50,4.6193119,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),47,4.7534139727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),46,4.92496032,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),3,6.4338078083,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),2,6.4231015039,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),3,6.5176881164,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),121,2.6995507958,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),119,2.8263926375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),124,2.7609998177,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),4,6.3600840412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),3,6.4120081043,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),2,6.5747854368,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),51,4.6023031072,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),59,4.402589158,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),64,4.4066576737,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),142,1.678221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),142,1.9646892093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),12,6.0862133846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),8,6.1626417846,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),10,6.1560458864,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),67,4.1340812303,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),65,4.308064,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),62,4.4660988811,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),110,3.1988158012,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),109,3.1551332577,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),114,3.1199698134,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),139,1.707322,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),143,1.8069953448,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),80,3.8400914729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),77,3.9832125534,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),85,3.9089139479,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),78,3.8705529966,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),81,3.8535428583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),86,3.9075388,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),102,3.33622795,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),113,3.1131438534,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),110,3.2568479627,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),98,3.3963352647,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),91,3.6116112335,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),76,4.1165839354,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),14,6.0680720452,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),16,5.9883123125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),14,6.0758275605,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),112,3.1535293602,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),115,3.0492844345,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),115,3.1086746965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),43,4.84275625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),49,4.6949306373,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),53,4.6715546626,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),138,1.730141,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),137,1.8728196535,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),136,2.304758419,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),31,5.4486223687,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),30,5.4236914379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),33,5.4464433927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),49,4.6510248,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),56,4.4745059241,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),50,4.7693993829,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),74,4.0036340792,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),75,4.0452453514,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),77,4.0926926068,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),60,4.3475781918,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),51,4.6237509207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),43,4.9852942222,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),118,2.9427024979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),117,2.9336442357,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),126,2.6836655453,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),1,6.5730158569,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),1,6.5067823966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),1,6.6440277663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),33,5.342522542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),39,5.0555154316,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),39,5.0826129919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),79,3.8426618824,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),86,3.770106133,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),96,3.6706800709,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),84,3.7908368322,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),74,4.0512147086,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),75,4.1372286654,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),52,4.5829966825,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),44,4.8770549619,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),44,4.974371,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),39,4.9343549866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),43,4.8888931486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),37,5.1599591239,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),72,4.041271,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),67,4.2745961511,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),52,4.6749954048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),89,3.7048589122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),85,3.7960956407,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),81,3.9757805962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),101,3.3539228006,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),114,3.0983127,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),109,3.27335559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),95,3.5018299888,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),83,3.8236967198,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),89,3.7687405588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),10,6.1810112944,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),7,6.1925244667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),13,6.107141,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),65,4.2043353764,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),69,4.247478123,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),66,4.3622643108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),87,3.882007,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),85,3.7710848953,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),97,3.4884607907,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),107,3.3908551974,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),108,3.16866,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),129,2.6016613703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),134,2.209918,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),145,1.7812652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),97,3.4164630966,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),105,3.251389,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),108,3.3681605024,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),136,2.0158429919,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),129,2.405720356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),120,2.9887838656,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),27,5.7190424095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),23,5.7691676846,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),23,5.8239814653,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),22,5.8456488434,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),14,6.0173998938,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),9,6.1581516176,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),34,5.3131459032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),32,5.3938856102,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),27,5.676197559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),87,3.762997,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),95,3.5450105537,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),113,3.1350200787,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),63,4.2819053169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),61,4.3702089455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),56,4.5837233453,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),132,2.3885649284,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),133,2.2130478281,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),132,2.3525478578,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),82,3.8268040955,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),82,3.838049588,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),90,3.7633538137,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),46,4.793640266,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),46,4.8383849676,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),40,5.0564468187,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),109,3.1988494332,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),106,3.2510590117,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),117,3.1037212908,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),16,6.0314457111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),18,5.9289704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),20,5.87930891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),139,2.153695,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),55,4.5295606325,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),60,4.3943870571,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),71,4.2568348753,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),69,4.0868904182,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),80,3.8603147112,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),83,3.917271369,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),122,2.6870566235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),121,2.6613552414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),128,2.6325580247,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),135,2.1222180794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),135,2.0734012797,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),141,2.0121134412,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),75,3.9898075042,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),72,4.1444898392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),67,4.3330582875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),123,2.6845437,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),124,2.55562824,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),123,2.7840981845,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),36,5.1720887259,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),38,5.1359088602,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),36,5.1666139946,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),111,3.1859387949,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),110,3.1469354057,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),111,3.239292795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),104,3.297464071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),99,3.4561719972,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),101,3.5235499559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),124,2.6436095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),112,3.1157255029,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),102,3.4631500479,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),5,6.3024337694,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),4,6.2655004503,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),6,6.2545660414,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),17,5.9290029076,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),17,5.9463709451,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),5,6.2584102636,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),115,3.073624815,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),104,3.3157428462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),105,3.4118321,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),23,5.8194005798,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),27,5.6641835189,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),28,5.6718154587,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),44,4.8426621032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),40,5.0133188176,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),47,4.919328,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),90,3.6746271443,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),93,3.5889681583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),92,3.7471060583,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),56,4.4768220084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),37,5.1500644015,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),34,5.3681592395,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),76,3.9140393667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),89,3.6699480094,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),94,3.7062994969,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),73,4.0261379143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),73,4.0783766733,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),74,4.1549216123,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),48,4.7193592305,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),53,4.5259115272,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),55,4.6050879923,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),59,4.3835946297,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),57,4.4666642037,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),59,4.5312716109,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),26,5.7197896979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),26,5.6949129283,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),29,5.6681212442,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),133,2.3478059982,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),131,2.3619430575,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),130,2.5881954609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),7,6.259128,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),10,6.114447947,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),15,6.048231583,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),58,4.3998351691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),64,4.3192314052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),60,4.5038154995,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),62,4.3172746595,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),70,4.2240912498,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),54,4.6497426347,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),77,3.8708609521,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),66,4.276995,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),68,4.287200514,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),40,4.895767,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),42,4.9354927846,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),49,4.7890900615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),71,4.0531202911,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),84,3.8163598076,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),93,3.7176521906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),6,6.2941035453,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),5,6.2629293152,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),4,6.3030591738,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),136,1.931919,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),133,2.3354122,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),114,3.0874780929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),103,3.3567238532,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),97,3.6699860641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),83,3.8212294447,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),92,3.594307075,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),84,3.909795993,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),126,2.549314,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),125,2.5451781634,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),131,2.5780772092,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),35,5.2766782857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),29,5.4888591,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),31,5.4910555011,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),25,5.791324,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),20,5.838818927,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),16,6.0000873981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),2,6.4450024145,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),11,6.0846656,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),8,6.1769344361,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),127,2.5084476737,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),126,2.5221157736,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),112,3.2012051169,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),52,4.585884,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),69,4.2841736127,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),120,2.6997472281,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),139,1.5924076691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),144,1.5129172624,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),148,1.3485899536,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),54,4.5363734333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),63,4.3447721038,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),65,4.3959474317,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),94,3.5285747256,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),94,3.5785534838,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),130,2.4607338721,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),128,2.4284500652,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),137,2.2903638754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),61,4.3336178095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),55,4.5025162382,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),57,4.5834207481,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),53,4.5431451383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),95,3.693169624,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),64,4.2504935307,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),68,4.2536369427,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),63,4.4484903676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),13,6.0836307865,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),9,6.129831258,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),7,6.2145157461,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),119,2.7130217809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),120,2.792937244,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),118,3.0524665791,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),117,2.957475222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),118,2.9026581804,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),121,2.8966151082,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),70,4.05873515,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),62,4.3598587023,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),70,4.2837649092,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),11,6.1608219031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),15,6.0013315497,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),19,5.9351296035,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),24,5.7969245673,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),24,5.7470469932,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),18,5.948874206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),99,3.3802150072,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),101,3.3976646714,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),106,3.4045084452,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),42,4.85624688,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),41,4.98550465,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),41,5.0505540244,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),141,1.495768,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),140,1.687648019,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),146,1.726194972,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),100,3.3739956,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),111,3.1189399853,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),116,3.1040985522,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),116,2.9839724457,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),107,3.1797868066,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),103,3.4630021475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),129,2.4740126,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),123,2.6463702,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ084,10.02 Internet access in schools (1-7),119,3.0495885124,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),138,3.0551274609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),144,2.69697,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),88,4.1571432945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),106,3.7318717656,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),126,3.33475695,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),12,5.7919142019,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),6,5.902110426,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),2,6.072417,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),117,3.6120662105,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),111,3.6416215405,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),118,3.4732356593,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),110,3.8165104882,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),77,4.0941777583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),64,4.2931603641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),30,5.2794501462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),23,5.4221614571,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),24,5.272218712,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),15,5.7180055841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),18,5.5521085603,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),23,5.2872528632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),59,4.488393841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),37,4.9393286513,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),31,5.1909860111,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),141,2.609658,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),144,2.4379930444,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),148,2.5918655822,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),25,5.4961997,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),22,5.4226911642,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),19,5.3831868994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),101,3.9124651821,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),115,3.5180425923,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),131,3.2273811613,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),118,3.5743344646,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),126,3.2415123407,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),105,3.6315241959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),105,3.8753944956,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),100,3.8050119968,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),96,3.7417499146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),76,4.2920088465,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),88,3.9714521195,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),91,3.8374674418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),13,5.7860301573,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),13,5.7559963379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),18,5.4053211708,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),67,4.392935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),60,4.3341389,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),65,4.286033,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),121,3.52772,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),126,3.4080092403,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),117,3.487763153,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),99,3.7135977644,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),54,4.5911039303,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),68,4.2127860747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),88,3.9204842851,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),32,5.2623036263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),33,5.0897257459,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),42,4.8179405512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),39,5.0878457277,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),32,5.105871963,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),30,5.1938905077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),50,4.548791,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),81,4.2246989982,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),89,3.9698669381,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),93,3.8138468994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),28,5.4285190819,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),28,5.3268497134,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),26,5.2467290059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),5,5.987907689,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),4,5.9256193479,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),13,5.69887454,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),34,5.2514103472,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),35,5.0436008255,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),38,4.961804125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),31,5.2647233923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),39,4.8309150259,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),45,4.6682527143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),120,3.5353177939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),127,3.2409234464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),124,3.3926097214,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),122,3.5205695078,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),119,3.4459473069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),100,3.7046820937,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),70,4.3512378202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),82,4.0519240842,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),70,4.2054178347,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),53,4.6253887577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),58,4.4153751806,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),61,4.3560069447,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),55,4.5879855021,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),54,4.5834045585,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),47,4.6111316559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),38,5.0959615954,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),38,4.8674084775,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),46,4.6298631232,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),47,4.7617762961,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),49,4.6954632405,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),58,4.4629919587,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),26,5.4636187706,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),25,5.3997848225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),25,5.2497783684,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),8,5.9506783309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),20,5.4743466565,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),28,5.2338016086,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),93,4.1303789629,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),86,4.0068183103,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),80,4.0125872333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),133,3.1499639478,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),142,2.630924925,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),138,3.0262555337,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),100,3.9451336418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),87,3.980936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),66,4.2555258754,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),85,4.1771582995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),104,3.7518019716,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),92,3.8164149564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),40,5.0417868143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),34,5.0504292763,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),36,5.06083298,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),9,5.9456572583,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),8,5.8394586247,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),7,5.8051933153,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),119,3.5599891938,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),124,3.3215415,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),132,3.1732382608,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),19,5.6049326118,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),11,5.7908884217,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),10,5.7421133632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),18,5.6062194236,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),29,5.3100348139,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),35,5.0719836632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),134,3.134271,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),125,3.3367283234,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),27,5.4287833077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),17,5.5784885615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),21,5.3375178182,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),77,4.279105384,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),67,4.214598,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),67,4.2547848385,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),103,3.8814692935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),96,3.8406880896,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),84,3.9472947987,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),135,3.112655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),135,3.0950558414,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),45,4.7815625326,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),53,4.6123095713,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),55,4.4990582123,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),87,4.1659979369,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),107,3.713958572,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),109,3.6030732011,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),79,4.247595375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),99,3.8228728012,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),75,4.0862901533,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),74,4.3200635765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),65,4.2575906497,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),68,4.2503354459,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),16,5.6845843871,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),19,5.4901987625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),14,5.5350476721,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),114,3.765237505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),113,3.5555918895,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),115,3.519185973,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),75,4.30488355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),66,4.2508119966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),72,4.166152569,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),140,2.867051,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),140,2.7812937296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),141,2.8766560592,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),64,4.4230128099,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),69,4.2000589987,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),83,3.9576908702,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),78,4.27140205,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),73,4.1383379609,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),69,4.2453760457,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),69,4.3732626103,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),64,4.2598863946,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),63,4.3164915981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),52,4.6260360371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),46,4.7638516595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),44,4.719862335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),99,3.9580460128,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),78,4.0823949614,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),95,3.7816039527,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),7,5.9557410482,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),15,5.5925753138,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),15,5.4822564772,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),21,5.5755248319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),21,5.4468066888,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),22,5.3197180027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),66,4.4046034505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),83,4.0499077989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),107,3.6097174145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),61,4.4606152136,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),76,4.1178059516,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),94,3.7866879713,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),58,4.5650158667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),48,4.6972159238,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),39,4.890372,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),42,4.9043737908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),42,4.8146894028,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),32,5.1423081363,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),51,4.66083,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),52,4.6279627289,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),59,4.3942240619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),56,4.586052478,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),59,4.3678860889,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),62,4.3450782981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),129,3.2798821725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),133,3.14061165,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),140,2.973105775,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),83,4.1925610788,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),74,4.1279350859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),87,3.9211988382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),6,5.9703049278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),7,5.881406,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),12,5.706288086,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),90,4.1425834858,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),84,4.0393152034,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),78,4.0301798784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),73,4.156609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),136,3.0780144206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),141,2.711363214,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),145,2.6551294364,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),90,3.920583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),119,3.4700711973,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),130,3.191582,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),147,2.6178790667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),48,4.6887713241,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),41,4.82253,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),43,4.8030577488,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),131,3.2295312423,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),138,3.0561427417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),136,3.0557290215,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),37,5.1312341063,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),36,5.014248945,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),37,5.0365502959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),10,5.8782385783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),3,6.0060821625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),4,5.8893674235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),63,4.4407358605,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),56,4.524797619,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),54,4.5268226103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),95,4.059158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),92,3.8865735851,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),106,3.6165945508,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),112,3.7989702634,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),105,3.7390550455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),98,3.7270022821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),108,3.8510716911,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),120,3.4288538539,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),116,3.5158152498,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),86,4.1732921915,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),70,4.1619110826,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),79,4.0301387274,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),62,4.4481346041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),71,4.155540952,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),49,4.5971104199,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),92,4.1351348311,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),81,4.0656897312,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),71,4.1935874837,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),14,5.741445,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),14,5.7542262909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),11,5.72171912,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),137,3.033359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),65,4.4190926968,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),61,4.3326362156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),60,4.3925038052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),57,4.5840209455,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),57,4.4202430201,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),81,3.9762317251,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),97,4.0015765934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),110,3.6572444966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),129,3.3039326213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),134,3.1184490473,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),139,2.9956574497,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),143,2.7031565588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),73,4.3250363869,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),63,4.2615596263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),52,4.5447868875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),82,4.2095343,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),94,3.859807664,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),114,3.5200692155,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),20,5.5937640244,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),26,5.3848539416,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),20,5.3395337622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),91,4.1390185026,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),103,3.7836299688,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),97,3.7304529565,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),60,4.4670700879,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),72,4.1391728505,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),104,3.6622877033,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),125,3.4314053597,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),114,3.5463498265,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),111,3.5647092925,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),17,5.6757244903,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),5,5.9249448331,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),5,5.8372098343,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),11,5.8518311748,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),12,5.7667462984,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),6,5.814804586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),127,3.403848605,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),128,3.2303266923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),130,3.27391745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),33,5.2559385266,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),27,5.3513567566,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),17,5.4257699522,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),24,5.5024921047,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),31,5.1422775365,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),34,5.09134,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),113,3.7976132816,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),121,3.4241792792,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),128,3.3065284458,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),46,4.7622191285,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),45,4.7660407843,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),41,4.8201850407,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),71,4.3475538828,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),85,4.0202029708,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),82,3.969603816,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),106,3.8733025371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),79,4.0786924667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),74,4.1017026608,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),94,4.084368336,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),108,3.6780640371,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),108,3.6050027101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),49,4.6728812291,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),51,4.6756387425,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),51,4.5468802867,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),22,5.566442254,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),24,5.4097786908,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),27,5.2379937116,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),130,3.2769228749,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),125,3.2522822517,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),120,3.4596753362,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),2,6.170108,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),1,6.1121791924,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),1,6.0906588878,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),84,4.1813440784,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),95,3.8591900313,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),110,3.5833467005,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),111,3.8117879112,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),116,3.5146354848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),102,3.6812218983,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),43,4.9021896068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),50,4.678443,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),33,5.0987687653,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),23,5.540921,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),16,5.5826263538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),16,5.4527669962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),68,4.3808152691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),75,4.1278230391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),77,4.0306779354,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),3,6.0962446606,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),2,6.0700828424,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),3,5.9306084872,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),136,3.105447,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),133,3.1686409,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),98,3.9946336786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),98,3.8280087839,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),101,3.6857155513,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),107,3.8623378981,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),93,3.868812225,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),103,3.6668543593,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),132,3.16134,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),129,3.2029685577,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),134,3.130215592,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),89,4.1542330571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),80,4.0681571493,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),90,3.8513251648,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),44,4.859362,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),44,4.7822309607,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),48,4.6029480875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),1,6.333589971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),10,5.8105476807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),9,5.7485989959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),137,3.0686271105,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),137,3.0736835692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),127,3.3188793807,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),43,4.793972,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),57,4.4696444317,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),128,3.3560308026,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),123,3.5005501918,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),131,3.1730470197,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),146,2.6483510406,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),72,4.3416871789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),101,3.8044666654,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),86,3.9419647081,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),80,4.2320533729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),62,4.3014459025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),139,2.9290048459,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),122,3.4052296379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),139,3.0212979,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),109,3.8328304429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),102,3.7900666434,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),89,3.8864500293,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),35,5.1880354836,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),76,4.0799434653,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),41,4.9460568542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),40,4.8241474506,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),40,4.8772569101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),4,6.0882422481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),9,5.8219217304,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),8,5.7547684142,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),116,3.6736272854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),112,3.6006471476,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),123,3.3999141115,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),102,3.9116499846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),109,3.6695959511,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),112,3.5468741672,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),96,4.01179195,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),91,3.9012093362,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),121,3.4142913396,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),36,5.1798591242,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),47,4.707206227,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),56,4.4873470538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),29,5.3082744226,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),30,5.2306670737,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),29,5.2053685402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),124,3.4947692819,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),118,3.4591558679,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),113,3.5303452839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),50,4.66871364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),55,4.56915975,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),53,4.5442699561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),142,2.055223,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),143,2.4520324857,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),142,2.81433046,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),115,3.73843995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),123,3.3785669118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),122,3.4003309793,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),104,3.8760935914,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),97,3.8318853165,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),85,3.9443070682,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),135,3.0877114333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),132,3.1502072333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ076,10.01 Impact of ICTs on access to basic services (1-7),117,3.5118509041,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),139,2.2564745445,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),139,2.357632,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),69,3.6884575524,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),81,3.5369649547,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),97,3.2976646125,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),33,4.756368389,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),7,5.7539423457,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),5,5.83732825,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),108,3.0762175132,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),96,3.3232659459,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),98,3.2863967046,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),106,3.1117061062,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),90,3.3694102322,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),80,3.5756861795,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),8,5.5746724731,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),15,5.4085754429,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),15,5.332270636,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),16,5.2871746849,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),29,4.9542593361,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),31,4.8311840493,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),67,3.7037545428,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),57,3.9415117673,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),46,4.1478073222,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),141,1.9470378913,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),144,1.8977928487,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),147,2.0045505822,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),20,5.0772401986,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),41,4.3410305967,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),40,4.3315086645,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),110,3.0529428964,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),123,2.7524544885,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),136,2.4724482288,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),127,2.7177629177,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),124,2.7403746593,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),120,2.8353531156,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),120,2.9053777182,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),118,2.8962496968,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),118,2.9133190252,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),55,3.9187592438,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),89,3.3922808171,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),93,3.3504020582,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),12,5.4425511379,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),16,5.3778705793,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),18,5.1748398394,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),101,3.2065675,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),95,3.33442765,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),85,3.4916905,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),122,2.8827415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),112,3.0444417224,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),104,3.1377998096,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),101,3.2359685726,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),54,3.9314142266,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),48,4.0796885001,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),58,3.9353006756,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),44,4.1974138898,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),52,4.025334739,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),64,3.8411610463,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),46,4.1782392448,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),35,4.7121027639,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),32,4.82235885,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),81,3.55808725,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),91,3.4101000321,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),103,3.213746457,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),107,3.1182696473,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),11,5.4452812309,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),17,5.3466166458,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),16,5.3297063941,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),25,4.9188772577,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),24,5.0805024799,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),26,4.960928775,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),36,4.6318887868,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),27,4.9653912975,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),29,4.9060942719,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),30,4.7732007439,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),42,4.2947760017,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),44,4.2205692083,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),125,2.775146838,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),129,2.6099393152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),127,2.7562207208,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),124,2.8391851375,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),126,2.7151987491,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),123,2.8132155476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),47,4.1501278746,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),38,4.4225645901,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),39,4.422995798,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),62,3.7921431217,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),62,3.8628711332,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),69,3.8123555186,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),63,3.7748204468,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),53,3.9944974912,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),54,4.0406731047,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),37,4.6299859019,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),55,3.9658050718,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),57,3.9727531146,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),48,4.1038439922,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),44,4.2805284009,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),47,4.1193369696,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),27,4.8922987985,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),22,5.1169317267,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),20,5.168069919,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),7,5.5775459048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),19,5.1790974106,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),24,5.048926611,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),86,3.4974689237,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),59,3.8914243379,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),61,3.8804843786,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),135,2.3730932652,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),141,2.1497012167,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),140,2.3413292577,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),95,3.3091199582,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),82,3.52191275,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),71,3.7754573546,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),83,3.5239805446,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),58,3.9302311624,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),65,3.834105794,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),22,5.0169081531,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),36,4.5777833193,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),36,4.630996325,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),4,5.7655248063,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),5,5.8277662921,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),4,5.8823453641,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),121,2.8934624755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),99,3.2743298719,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),103,3.1978179196,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),18,5.1715146581,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),9,5.735027575,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),7,5.7755584895,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),23,4.9754084941,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),32,4.7896160169,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),35,4.681218577,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),133,2.409188,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),134,2.5750625514,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),9,5.5209850962,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),4,5.8612876923,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),9,5.7211035795,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),73,3.6159861195,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),60,3.879639,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),59,3.9285875355,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),111,3.0448591793,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),107,3.1129293264,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),106,3.1688135149,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),140,2.25348975,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),142,2.2681503017,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),78,3.5849100768,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),79,3.5691044847,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),84,3.4990773265,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),77,3.5888393422,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),83,3.5080966088,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),87,3.4450186747,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),81,3.5406633219,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),100,3.2643581342,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),95,3.3237228531,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),96,3.2998208324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),102,3.2391694934,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),91,3.3652826054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),5,5.6932424,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),12,5.5360724667,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),11,5.6168683837,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),104,3.1216556599,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),114,2.9890723977,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),119,2.8510850975,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),50,4.0943423125,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),68,3.7937667934,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),66,3.8273501332,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),140,2.08366225,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),142,2.0302989275,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),143,2.2217418792,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),45,4.1820511174,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),40,4.3491029565,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),42,4.2558518088,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),66,3.72362525,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),72,3.7377027187,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),63,3.8441062771,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),65,3.76322394,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),73,3.7109572757,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),73,3.7385800331,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),41,4.3411631845,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),56,3.9569170932,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),55,4.0325719009,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),107,3.1045504588,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),94,3.3599532817,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),105,3.1729608143,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),32,4.767953708,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),33,4.7589589845,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),34,4.7168499811,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),28,4.875587823,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),14,5.4493177385,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),14,5.4023693574,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),74,3.6152299563,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),80,3.5674328936,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),94,3.3418567844,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),84,3.5089506239,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),92,3.3612439396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),100,3.2402613851,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),49,4.1007717683,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),54,3.9822870452,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),51,4.09206025,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),26,4.9007700565,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),31,4.8764216233,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),23,5.1300870954,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),43,4.31420175,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),23,5.0866569444,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),21,5.1499968024,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),64,3.7689113274,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),84,3.4737599852,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),83,3.501492967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),100,3.2380825649,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),115,2.9347405,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),116,2.9231005794,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),93,3.3594240376,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),101,3.2633796395,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),110,3.0970961728,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),1,6.2089687333,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),2,6.1858178833,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),2,6.0852843439,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),76,3.6017830408,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),85,3.4714657615,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),82,3.5043461473,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),92,3.3537015,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),114,3.0023461512,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),120,2.8596690965,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),121,2.8144780519,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),109,3.07596525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),128,2.709121648,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),138,2.30891525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),148,1.9414731167,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),70,3.6846810914,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),77,3.61523425,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),77,3.643058939,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),134,2.4369135321,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),135,2.3931881737,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),135,2.5265035812,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),24,4.9641254282,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),28,4.955826427,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),27,4.9568505327,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),34,4.7232124843,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),20,5.1513688797,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),19,5.1729354029,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),53,4.0352994287,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),51,4.05752195,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),45,4.1695123526,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),92,3.39874875,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),105,3.1333372884,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),115,2.9351479213,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),87,3.4433820204,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),65,3.802961675,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),60,3.8859388991,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),128,2.6576953938,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),130,2.4993560154,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),132,2.614256411,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),58,3.8877175593,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),47,4.2161405968,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),48,4.1122208236,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),56,3.910251629,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),70,3.7678638233,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),52,4.061968608,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),94,3.3484128066,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),108,3.1086725396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),109,3.1013870906,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),19,5.1189697583,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),26,5.0115035864,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),28,4.9407893925,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),141,2.30026,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),57,3.9074301439,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),49,4.0764802688,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),56,4.0199330864,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),51,4.0913173727,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),43,4.287978947,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),49,4.101258286,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),109,3.0647885131,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),117,2.9283087828,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),124,2.7946927917,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),130,2.5505940176,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),136,2.356965344,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),144,2.1408529191,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),82,3.5263993129,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),78,3.5721518774,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),74,3.6917364146,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),117,2.9566424117,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),127,2.711878328,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),131,2.6412070871,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),15,5.3143298995,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),25,5.0183388836,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),25,4.9993281068,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),118,2.9338948205,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),121,2.8010776511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),122,2.8140827581,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),102,3.1609711767,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),88,3.4020290343,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),99,3.2488607577,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),119,2.9316759714,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),116,2.930398089,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),111,3.084729982,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),13,5.3966936238,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),3,6.0767236212,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),3,6.0563440254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),17,5.2417379311,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),13,5.467121952,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),13,5.5765643675,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),126,2.7549447763,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),125,2.7276150962,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),129,2.7035022875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),10,5.4518064311,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),21,5.1497633583,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),17,5.1779443663,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),38,4.4079195653,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),34,4.7463088912,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),33,4.73359775,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),99,3.2864566731,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),113,3.0546378354,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),112,3.0290274677,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),59,3.8774926591,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),39,4.3830444809,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),37,4.4833786254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),75,3.6078847704,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),74,3.7037281845,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),75,3.671423433,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),88,3.41863368,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),76,3.6236881783,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),76,3.6587929672,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),68,3.6931410356,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),86,3.4547845897,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),88,3.4245429872,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),39,4.3966046259,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),37,4.5334201893,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),38,4.4637568148,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),29,4.8652876907,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),30,4.9397719888,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),30,4.8492351785,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),131,2.5206477955,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),122,2.752776954,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),125,2.7776545029,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),21,5.04949675,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),8,5.7504661379,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),8,5.7225624206,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),85,3.5030947278,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),97,3.3121096904,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),96,3.2979899254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),89,3.4149961595,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),50,4.0617295571,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),41,4.2699038801,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),60,3.8495397288,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),61,3.87529625,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),53,4.0541174335,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),40,4.37412525,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),18,5.21541965,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),22,5.1406018091,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),79,3.5820522317,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),75,3.6699583054,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),86,3.482625468,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),3,5.9100836411,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),1,6.2826420727,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),1,6.2427737659,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),131,2.46072475,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),133,2.6085219875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),113,3.0299153946,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),71,3.7561247125,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),70,3.7774007615,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),105,3.1117486519,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),93,3.3603168125,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),90,3.380652423,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),138,2.2905485,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),137,2.3269437782,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),138,2.3801322621,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),72,3.6244612607,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),66,3.7972624839,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),78,3.6339442934,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),31,4.769748,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),46,4.2729101562,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),43,4.2233255567,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),6,5.6427971069,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),10,5.6169245101,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),10,5.6241332051,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),133,2.4706983224,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),134,2.4047662588,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),126,2.7612168256,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),69,3.78140575,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),79,3.6286683849,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),129,2.6103535048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),136,2.3700659078,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),139,2.2588998583,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),146,2.0486540888,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),71,3.6382797221,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),67,3.7943453933,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),68,3.8256705629,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),97,3.2972364739,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),98,3.3079913444,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),132,2.4932066885,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),128,2.6148051534,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),137,2.3858423605,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),90,3.4112266155,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),91,3.3672953167,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),89,3.4116754577,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),42,4.3294489888,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),72,3.7555485464,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),52,4.0743043917,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),63,3.8167806212,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),67,3.826634481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),2,5.9522685098,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),6,5.8240180744,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),6,5.789398253,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),123,2.8413227396,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),119,2.8904618534,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),117,2.9144151613,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),103,3.1243782104,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),111,3.0650886997,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),114,2.9780809631,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),80,3.55932625,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),87,3.4255251944,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),102,3.1997769692,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),35,4.6462690557,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),45,4.2743103426,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),50,4.0965477059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),14,5.3757552967,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),11,5.5466333399,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),12,5.5805417255,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),115,2.991916094,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),106,3.1148568241,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),108,3.1161306952,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),61,3.81289124,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),64,3.8071493375,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),62,3.8488223634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),142,1.771687,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),143,1.9647875381,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),145,2.127179897,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),98,3.2874776625,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),112,3.0547842794,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),113,3.0179974378,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),116,2.9573479571,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),110,3.0662944473,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),104,3.195996852,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),137,2.3400916667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),132,2.422627675,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D.10,Pillar 10. Social impacts (1-7),130,2.6860734731,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2013,AGO,Angola,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,AGO,Angola,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,AGO,Angola,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,ALB,Albania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,ALB,Albania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,ALB,Albania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",99,13.6501366437,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",30,36.0905933121,2000,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",30,36.0905933121,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",30,36.0905933121,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ARG,Argentina,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",82,17.7125951334,2001,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ARG,Argentina,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",83,17.7125951334,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ARG,Argentina,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",56,24.9966676184,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ARM,Armenia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",56,24.1435959127,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ARM,Armenia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",56,24.1435959127,2001,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ARM,Armenia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",62,24.1435959127,2001,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,AUS,Australia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",12,42.867384467,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,AUS,Australia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",12,42.867384467,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,AUS,Australia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",16,42.867384467,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,AUT,Austria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",27,36.7392455622,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,AUT,Austria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",27,36.7392455622,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,AUT,Austria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",25,38.5097971914,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",69,20.2638067061,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",70,20.2638067061,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",60,24.219999538,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BDI,Burundi,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BDI,Burundi,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,BDI,Burundi,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,BEL,Belgium,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",10,43.4249151521,,,, +2012,BEL,Belgium,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",10,43.4249151521,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BEL,Belgium,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",11,44.5967584707,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BEN,Benin,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,BEN,Benin,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a,15/12/2011 +2014,BEN,Benin,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",101,7.3252106341,2004,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",103,7.3252106341,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",109,7.3252106341,2005,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",46,28.5922575654,2004,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",46,28.5922575654,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",49,29.563748839,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",68,20.7303045061,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",68,20.7303045061,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",74,20.7303045061,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2003,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,BLZ,Belize,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BLZ,Belize,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",69,20.4069419509,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BLZ,Belize,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2005,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",91,14.3226304646,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",93,14.3226304646,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",95,15.2548812774,2009,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BRA,Brazil,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",75,19.3091416422,,,, +2012,BRA,Brazil,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",76,19.3091416422,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BRA,Brazil,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",75,20.5049775381,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BRB,Barbados,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",1,57.5757575758,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BRB,Barbados,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",1,57.5757575758,2004,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BRB,Barbados,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",47,30.303030303,2004,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",47,28.3533676779,,,, +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",47,28.3533676779,2003,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",51,28.3533676779,2003,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,BTN,Bhutan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",90,16.4848862574,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,BWA,Botswana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",84,17.1041454141,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,BWA,Botswana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",85,17.1041454141,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,BWA,Botswana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",86,17.1041454141,2006,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CAN,Canada,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",14,42.3857571617,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CAN,Canada,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",14,42.3857571617,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CAN,Canada,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",13,43.796729439,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",4,47.1269803736,,,, +2012,CHE,Switzerland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",4,47.1269803736,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",3,49.8385143273,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CHL,Chile,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",42,30.6275525161,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CHL,Chile,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",42,30.6275525161,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CHL,Chile,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",63,24.0567127623,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CHN,China,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",100,7.3718223293,,,, +2012,CHN,China,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",102,7.3718223293,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CHN,China,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",108,7.3718223293,2005,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,CMR,Cameroon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,CMR,Cameroon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,CMR,Cameroon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,COL,Colombia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",66,21.5782622032,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,COL,Colombia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",66,21.5782622032,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,COL,Colombia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",89,16.815836706,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",50,27.4290650087,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",50,27.4290650087,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",65,23.8667067544,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",41,31.4314669899,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",41,31.4314669899,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",33,34.9748459232,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",19,40.4821432177,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",19,40.4821432177,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",26,37.2913520827,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,DEU,Germany,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",15,41.9140806527,,,, +2012,DEU,Germany,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",15,41.9140806527,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,DEU,Germany,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",14,43.5096921592,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,DNK,Denmark,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",6,45.1457843857,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,DNK,Denmark,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",6,45.1457843857,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,DNK,Denmark,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",9,45.1755090685,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",87,15.8165285504,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",88,15.8165285504,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",85,17.327469367,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,DZA,Algeria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",76,19.1013541239,2004,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,DZA,Algeria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",77,19.1013541239,2004,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,DZA,Algeria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",80,19.1013541239,2004,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",81,18.0824154237,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",82,18.0824154237,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",98,14.6490266516,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,EGY,Egypt,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",43,30.2631215533,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,EGY,Egypt,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",43,30.2631215533,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,EGY,Egypt,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",35,33.9909168978,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ESP,Spain,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",37,32.4433904657,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ESP,Spain,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",37,32.4433904657,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ESP,Spain,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",39,32.4844331983,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,EST,Estonia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",24,38.7966488957,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,EST,Estonia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",24,38.7966488957,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,EST,Estonia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",20,41.8217429183,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",96,12.3818223993,,,, +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",98,12.3818223993,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",91,15.8543928779,2011,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,FIN,Finland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",8,43.8156678418,,,, +2012,FIN,Finland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",8,43.8156678418,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,FIN,Finland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",12,43.8997262046,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,FRA,France,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",17,40.7680255623,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,FRA,France,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",17,40.7680255623,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,FRA,France,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",10,44.7512086705,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,GAB,Gabon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,GAB,Gabon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,GAB,Gabon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",13,42.534351145,,,, +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",13,42.534351145,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",5,47.2014098352,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,GEO,Georgia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",62,22.249603943,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,GEO,Georgia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",62,22.249603943,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,GEO,Georgia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",69,22.249603943,2007,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,GHA,Ghana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,GHA,Ghana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,GHA,Ghana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,GIN,Guinea,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,GIN,Guinea,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,GIN,Guinea,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",119,0.7456623067,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,GRC,Greece,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",35,33.4904803969,2002,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,GRC,Greece,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",35,33.4904803969,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,GRC,Greece,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",44,31.0888541118,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,GTM,Guatemala,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,GTM,Guatemala,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",104,9.4458790593,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,GUY,Guyana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",94,12.6772672259,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,GUY,Guyana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",96,12.6772672259,2002,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,GUY,Guyana,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",101,12.6772672259,2002,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",31,35.9525974764,,,, +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",31,35.9525974764,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",29,36.2165740767,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,HND,Honduras,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",93,12.8330163154,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,HND,Honduras,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",95,12.8330163154,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,HND,Honduras,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",100,12.8330163154,2005,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,HRV,Croatia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",44,30.086818293,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,HRV,Croatia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",44,30.086818293,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,HRV,Croatia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",40,32.253473202,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,HTI,Haiti,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,HTI,Haiti,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,HTI,Haiti,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,HUN,Hungary,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",28,36.6654637315,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,HUN,Hungary,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",28,36.6654637315,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,HUN,Hungary,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",31,35.4369854624,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",98,7.4078769027,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",100,7.4078769027,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",106,8.5853402741,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,IND,India,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,IND,India,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,IND,India,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,IRL,Ireland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",23,38.8190656865,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,IRL,Ireland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",23,38.8190656865,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,IRL,Ireland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",22,41.207811796,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",89,15.0390243902,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",91,15.0390243902,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",93,15.3216863587,2009,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ISL,Iceland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",5,46.0246360582,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ISL,Iceland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",5,46.0246360582,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ISL,Iceland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",6,46.8596818287,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ISR,Israel,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",16,41.2644866208,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ISR,Israel,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",16,41.2644866208,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ISR,Israel,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",19,42.3872118055,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ITA,Italy,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",22,39.6453420082,,,, +2012,ITA,Italy,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",22,39.6453420082,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ITA,Italy,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",34,34.522048561,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",71,20.1147456756,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",72,20.1147456756,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",78,20.1147456756,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,JOR,Jordan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,JOR,Jordan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,JOR,Jordan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,JPN,Japan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",26,37.8073610023,,,, +2012,JPN,Japan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",26,37.8073610023,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,JPN,Japan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",57,24.9282296651,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",48,28.3332484855,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",48,28.3332484855,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",50,29.2696753839,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,KEN,Kenya,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,KEN,Kenya,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,KEN,Kenya,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",80,18.3101951243,1999,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",81,18.3101951243,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",84,17.5538631305,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",108,2.5157644921,,,, +2012,KHM,Cambodia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",110,2.5157644921,2004,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",118,2.5157644921,2004,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",61,22.4371209229,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",61,22.4371209229,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",72,21.5415799369,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",77,18.6973903574,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",78,18.6973903574,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",82,18.6973903574,2005,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,LBN,Lebanon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",40,31.852472458,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",40,31.852472458,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",42,31.852472458,2007,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,LBR,Liberia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,LBR,Liberia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,LBR,Liberia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",105,9.3492208983,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,LBY,Libya,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,LBY,Libya,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,LBY,Libya,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",73,19.6941728344,,,, +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",74,19.6941728344,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",81,19.0588864549,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",104,6.0009780331,,,, +2012,LSO,Lesotho,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",106,6.0009780331,1999,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",113,6.0009780331,1999,0,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",21,39.6487085575,,,, +2012,LTU,Lithuania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",21,39.6487085575,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",18,42.7678563747,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",1,57.1826761781,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,LVA,Latvia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",20,40.1892370609,,,, +2012,LVA,Latvia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",20,40.1892370609,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,LVA,Latvia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",24,39.4793627422,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MAR,Morocco,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",102,6.7852607647,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MAR,Morocco,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",104,6.7852607647,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MAR,Morocco,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",111,6.7852607647,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MDA,Moldova,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",49,28.1774580336,,,, +2012,MDA,Moldova,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",49,28.1774580336,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MDA,Moldova,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",43,31.3406558526,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",109,2.3557120985,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",111,2.3557120985,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",116,2.8500406785,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MEX,Mexico,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",79,18.441676118,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MEX,Mexico,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",80,18.441676118,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MEX,Mexico,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",97,14.7406995191,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",52,25.5221956766,,,, +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",52,25.5221956766,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",48,29.6346852975,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MLI,Mali,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MLI,Mali,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,MLI,Mali,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,MLT,Malta,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",33,35.9313947782,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MLT,Malta,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",33,35.9313947782,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MLT,Malta,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",23,39.6640505083,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,MMR,Myanmar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,MNE,Montenegro,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",32,35.9365825015,2001,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",32,35.9365825015,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",27,37.2139303483,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",70,20.2081705451,2004,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",71,20.2081705451,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",64,24.039283821,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,MRT,Mauritania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,MRT,Mauritania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,MUS,Mauritius,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",88,15.7996146435,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",89,15.7996146435,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",76,20.3744493392,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,MWI,Malawi,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,MWI,Malawi,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,MWI,Malawi,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,MYS,Malaysia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",51,26.8199557207,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",51,26.8199557207,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",52,27.5270022417,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,NAM,Namibia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",86,16.9117818799,,,, +2012,NAM,Namibia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",87,16.9117818799,2004,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,NAM,Namibia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",88,16.9117818799,2004,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,NGA,Nigeria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",90,14.8249116052,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",92,14.8249116052,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",96,14.8249116052,2006,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",3,47.2035000591,2000,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",3,47.2035000591,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",8,45.9221706733,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,NOR,Norway,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",9,43.4627575277,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,NOR,Norway,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",9,43.4627575277,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,NOR,Norway,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",7,45.9630584408,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,NPL,Nepal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",105,4.7512291676,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,NPL,Nepal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",107,4.7512291676,2001,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,NPL,Nepal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",114,4.7512291676,2001,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",11,42.9211223837,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",11,42.9211223837,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",15,42.9211223837,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,OMN,Oman,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",54,24.2522475181,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,OMN,Oman,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",54,24.2522475181,2000,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,OMN,Oman,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",59,24.2522475181,2000,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",74,19.4785088613,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",75,19.4785088613,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",79,19.4785088613,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PAN,Panama,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",83,17.6638176638,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,PAN,Panama,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",84,17.6638176638,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PAN,Panama,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",58,24.3888865185,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PER,Peru,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",78,18.5461777362,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,PER,Peru,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",79,18.5461777362,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PER,Peru,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",94,15.2618630241,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PHL,Philippines,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",72,19.7395054123,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,PHL,Philippines,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",73,19.7395054123,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PHL,Philippines,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",68,22.460106383,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,POL,Poland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",36,32.7919796961,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,POL,Poland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",36,32.7919796961,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,POL,Poland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",32,35.0861302924,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",39,31.9272125724,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",39,31.9272125724,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",41,31.9272125724,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PRT,Portugal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",53,24.3718496287,,,, +2012,PRT,Portugal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",53,24.3718496287,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PRT,Portugal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",45,30.9879388094,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",92,14.0071930108,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",94,14.0071930108,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",92,15.4330710116,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,QAT,Qatar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",55,24.1997479407,,,, +2012,QAT,Qatar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",55,24.1997479407,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,QAT,Qatar,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",61,24.1997479407,2007,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ROU,Romania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",64,21.8003863765,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ROU,Romania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",64,21.8003863765,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ROU,Romania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",70,22.1960662469,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",18,40.6890720778,,,, +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",18,40.6890720778,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",17,42.7937297898,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,RWA,Rwanda,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,RWA,Rwanda,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",59,22.8839038015,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",59,22.8839038015,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",67,22.8839100616,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SEN,Senegal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SEN,Senegal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,SEN,Senegal,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,SGP,Singapore,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",2,51.0205183585,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SGP,Singapore,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",2,51.0205183585,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SGP,Singapore,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",2,51.0205183585,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,SLV,El Salvador,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",95,12.4920788523,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",97,12.4920788523,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",102,11.9393275154,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SRB,Serbia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",45,28.7246076861,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SRB,Serbia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",45,28.7246076861,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SRB,Serbia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",46,30.4276316528,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SUR,Suriname,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",65,21.5921636195,,,, +2012,SUR,Suriname,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",65,21.5921636195,2004,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SUR,Suriname,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",71,21.5921636195,2004,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",34,34.5550168461,2004,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",34,34.5550168461,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",38,32.935845641,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",25,37.9797979798,,,, +2012,SVN,Slovenia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",25,37.9797979798,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",21,41.3720499994,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SWE,Sweden,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",7,44.4589592859,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SWE,Sweden,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",7,44.4589592859,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SWE,Sweden,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",4,47.5779849924,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2006,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,SYC,Seychelles,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,SYC,Seychelles,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",53,26.3628172398,2011,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,SYR,Syria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,SYR,Syria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",90,15.5174686615,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,SYR,Syria,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2007,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,TCD,Chad,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TCD,Chad,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,TCD,Chad,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,THA,Thailand,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",97,10.7650836439,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,THA,Thailand,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",99,10.7650836439,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,THA,Thailand,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",103,10.9431763997,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2003,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",60,22.7526132404,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",60,22.7526132404,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",55,25.0128843841,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2007,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,TUN,Tunisia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",73,20.9392171766,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,TUR,Turkey,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",63,22.1194677739,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TUR,Turkey,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",63,22.1194677739,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,TUR,Turkey,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",77,20.2089620012,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",37,33.7210420071,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",107,2.5674914924,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",109,2.5674914924,2006,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",117,2.5674914924,2006,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,UGA,Uganda,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",106,4.2958963283,2004,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,UGA,Uganda,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",108,4.2958963283,2003,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,UGA,Uganda,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",115,4.356870594,2009,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",38,32.0742121751,2005,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",38,32.0742121751,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",36,33.8901444434,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,URY,Uruguay,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",67,21.395317455,,,, +2012,URY,Uruguay,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",67,21.395317455,2007,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,URY,Uruguay,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",66,23.1218984677,2011,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,USA,United States,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",29,36.2962810088,,,, +2012,USA,United States,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",29,36.2962810088,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,USA,United States,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",28,36.2962810088,2008,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",57,23.8740999902,,,, +2012,VEN,Venezuela,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",57,23.8740999902,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,VEN,Venezuela,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",83,18.5926127275,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",99,7.4078113385,,,, +2012,VNM,Vietnam,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",101,7.4078113385,2004,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,VNM,Vietnam,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",107,7.4078113385,2004,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,YEM,Yemen,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",85,16.9679440829,,,, +2012,YEM,Yemen,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",86,16.9679440829,2005,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,YEM,Yemen,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",87,16.9679440829,2005,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",58,23.6709691534,2008,Authors' calculations. See series note for details,International Labour Organisation;LaborSta database;http://laborsta.ilo.org/,15/12/2011 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",58,23.6709691534,2008,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",54,25.2851237243,2012,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",103,6.0212385882,,,, +2012,ZMB,Zambia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",105,6.0212385882,2000,,Author's calculation based on ILO Laborsta Database of labor statistics (1999-2008),15/12/2011 +2014,ZMB,Zambia,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",110,7.2843309859,2010,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,,,, +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",,,n/a,,n/a, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,KNOWLEDGEJOBSPCT,"9.04 Knowledge-intensive jobs, % workforce",112,6.6125627091,2011,0,International Labour Organization; ILOSTAT database; http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata/bulk-download?_adf.ctrl-state=sjns317x4_4&clean=true&_afrLoop=75876488023992,19/11/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),138,2.6368995578,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),137,2.939394,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),65,4.1801329628,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),90,3.8755567781,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),124,3.39153275,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),21,5.1240565542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),11,5.2530959523,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),9,5.312262,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),63,4.2057552632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),78,4.0773479189,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),88,3.9148602579,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),96,3.6785011429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),66,4.1894559092,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),36,4.6783299487,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),24,4.9220383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),28,4.8589597429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),21,4.943978344,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),37,4.6775921238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),49,4.462665094,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),48,4.4938472691,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),59,4.2740647602,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),39,4.5978760806,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),24,4.8932305306,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),140,2.4504672783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),142,2.6962508562,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),147,2.6453514257,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),27,4.9029684111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),30,4.8399019775,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),30,4.8110554852,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),117,3.4406155679,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),117,3.4883797231,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),132,3.1094378953,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),127,3.1449711443,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),128,3.2455732741,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),120,3.4546856204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),105,3.5681461095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),112,3.5540873452,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),119,3.4857108611,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),82,3.9129090817,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),94,3.7923972805,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),102,3.7231964537,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),42,4.5734635304,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),40,4.5578191655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),46,4.5235281104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),107,3.559923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),92,3.8159623,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),81,4.025449,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),130,2.969439,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),98,3.6673749821,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),101,3.6556797126,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),100,3.7278778164,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),34,4.7605242096,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),34,4.7269320567,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),43,4.5387504004,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),64,4.1832125618,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),63,4.2489405642,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),76,4.1197589024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),70,4.1082130738,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),57,4.3486335741,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),54,4.4159740462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),114,3.583662,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),119,3.4058715284,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),116,3.4931371196,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),126,3.3568827174,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),12,5.2515846713,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),14,5.1247026975,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),13,5.143825322,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),17,5.1644854622,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),19,4.9956909408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),31,4.78524451,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),35,4.7547841132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),35,4.7168692451,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),38,4.656887175,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),33,4.7715484959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),37,4.6568935077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),35,4.6868468095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),123,3.2588872459,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),110,3.5674583661,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),103,3.707425778,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),120,3.3982584747,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),108,3.5696460655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),108,3.6213445077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),40,4.5968063253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),55,4.363073652,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),56,4.3922555735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),73,4.0710784995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),77,4.1023882419,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),84,4.0031868723,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),45,4.5014724681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),43,4.5019724415,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),39,4.6338168029,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),69,4.1367287784,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),73,4.1225151888,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),82,4.0247831768,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),78,3.9649879896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),86,3.9552746703,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),73,4.1456039418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),25,4.9190456184,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),18,5.0093332869,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),17,5.0722473609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),8,5.35486065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),13,5.1743644739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),29,4.8170366997,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),53,4.4017115773,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),41,4.5057062207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),44,4.5352511762,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),142,2.120862087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),144,2.1140301458,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),140,2.9145765867,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),83,3.8942590286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),83,4.003059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),66,4.2426486024,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),74,4.0665825412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),80,4.0472413691,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),78,4.0494151256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),50,4.4698978857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),51,4.4090189979,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),33,4.69488082,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),10,5.2834217667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),12,5.2101540112,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),3,5.4616321661,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),125,3.1784447625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),120,3.4448657375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),130,3.2530176354,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),13,5.2459814162,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),2,5.5512912522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),1,5.7400179053,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),15,5.2105157494,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),22,4.9735442693,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),42,4.5682878254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),141,2.697307,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),146,2.7141520093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),3,5.5895429231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),1,5.5671699,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),6,5.3903413409,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),112,3.5148978894,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),119,3.460988,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),117,3.5392952781,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),101,3.6583618929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),93,3.7938298123,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),89,3.9142232919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),133,2.925027,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),142,2.8754604759,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),75,4.0518758751,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),59,4.3081869079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),64,4.2690558245,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),122,3.2629906381,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),127,3.2542942327,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),128,3.2721758856,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),38,4.6507550688,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),44,4.4864331391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),51,4.4756730112,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),97,3.6705038471,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),84,4.0020249249,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),75,4.1307842751,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),19,5.1579582839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),15,5.1089120875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),18,5.0649358465,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),52,4.4235199713,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),67,4.1679455807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),94,3.8415963844,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),79,3.94903135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),82,4.0270294843,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),67,4.2365419439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),135,2.814803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),137,2.841028293,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),136,2.9531819342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),103,3.6377256847,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),85,3.9969601529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),74,4.132714155,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),55,4.35462825,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),54,4.3704019425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),41,4.5802096171,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),32,4.8354755977,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),27,4.8698390216,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),40,4.6018846667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),31,4.8397472948,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),20,4.9770177009,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),15,5.0897497932,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),100,3.6614505462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),96,3.7628924464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),107,3.6236752898,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),14,5.2335212599,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),25,4.8916985448,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),22,4.9399032234,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),16,5.1863350783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),21,4.9745135153,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),19,4.9911842135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),92,3.7382418681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),100,3.6916455899,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),121,3.4537881686,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),71,4.1021681593,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),64,4.2419760703,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),63,4.2777644853,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),67,4.1652917206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),46,4.4821506857,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),34,4.694649,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),54,4.4010789197,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),50,4.4434910806,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),37,4.6654421739,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),87,3.826008,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),70,4.15022112,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),71,4.1928648143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),47,4.4921784024,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),38,4.6146025926,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),52,4.4580159585,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),124,3.2281770096,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),126,3.2840012,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),134,2.96266469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),93,3.7225604235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),75,4.1134354418,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),62,4.3152195294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),20,5.1312629333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),23,4.9632938,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),16,5.0858741374,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),114,3.502618067,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),129,3.1055913552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),133,3.0668388108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),70,4.197709,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),128,3.0782063364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),135,2.8862743674,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),138,2.930304787,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),99,3.720283,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),122,3.4276436784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),130,3.065701,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),143,2.8682487333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),49,4.4847440414,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),42,4.504686,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),45,4.5340616268,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),132,2.9502425187,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),134,2.9135284155,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),145,2.7366843495,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),23,4.9279367317,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),26,4.8913892858,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),25,4.8712450561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),28,4.8972718554,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),17,5.021846175,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),14,5.0955592059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),76,4.0433461261,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),71,4.1251304715,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),65,4.2481578462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),102,3.643556,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),89,3.8982693881,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),101,3.7266543803,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),111,3.5228482535,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),102,3.6477191273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),109,3.6176410171,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),118,3.4149511651,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),121,3.4359778011,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),105,3.6844095124,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),51,4.4365216612,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),45,4.4840622396,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),58,4.3878261281,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),104,3.5796471814,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),115,3.4932312843,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),90,3.9097293982,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),86,3.8525006361,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),58,4.3398914442,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),69,4.2257665051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),22,4.9457326444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),29,4.8487433273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),32,4.76540855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),135,2.961472,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),46,4.5004215854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),52,4.3895009169,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),72,4.1728006727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),95,3.6944112273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),98,3.735680858,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),112,3.6027445117,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),106,3.5658967158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),125,3.3178554828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),125,3.3791335466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),136,2.7293436809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),136,2.880204768,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),144,2.8606506765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),68,4.1453934137,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),62,4.2551805312,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),60,4.3387407167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),90,3.7662318533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),114,3.501542104,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),106,3.6299045552,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),9,5.3486219848,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),9,5.324129544,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),12,5.2549774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),110,3.5288222974,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),118,3.479999951,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),98,3.7283961863,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),61,4.2393490266,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),68,4.1570033187,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),80,4.0277073296,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),109,3.5303003767,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),111,3.5670444588,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),116,3.5708914596,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),11,5.260029129,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),5,5.3950287893,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),5,5.4061442331,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),5,5.4489965328,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),8,5.3599517852,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),8,5.3126245448,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),116,3.44591274,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),109,3.5682296154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),123,3.39405085,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),29,4.896882833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),24,4.8921519972,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),20,4.9830050348,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),44,4.5236179162,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),60,4.2907167473,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),57,4.39168,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),81,3.9369935431,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),91,3.8180105083,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),92,3.8529119958,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),43,4.5429287349,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),47,4.4700607221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),47,4.5064112293,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),56,4.3539279161,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),48,4.4697398994,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),55,4.4109486537,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),60,4.24526004,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),33,4.7537579867,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),28,4.8192276573,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),84,3.8736828927,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),95,3.7680920054,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),96,3.7626028826,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),39,4.6074714696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),32,4.8131210418,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),26,4.8626766359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),30,4.8894504544,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),31,4.8296924,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),27,4.8442479349,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),94,3.6993469699,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),97,3.7528116713,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),85,3.9921386986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),6,5.42586,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),3,5.5149217788,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),2,5.5305254729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),113,3.508740932,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),103,3.6308079188,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),115,3.5800945861,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),99,3.6664624838,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),106,3.6159854861,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),93,3.8520425907,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),48,4.4899331781,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),61,4.282837,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),53,4.4376791289,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),18,5.158404,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),16,5.0621046769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),23,4.9362798654,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),36,4.6952809141,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),72,4.123586238,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),104,3.7008351438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),4,5.5206472891,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),7,5.3788011636,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),11,5.3055219335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),140,2.732733,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),129,3.26446695,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),57,4.2899360214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),76,4.1065723097,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),79,4.043290859,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),133,2.9338884857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),132,2.97259005,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),131,3.2311145874,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),129,3.076769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),124,3.3468809493,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),118,3.5307240506,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),77,4.0054138929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),74,4.1221573219,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),83,4.0072272,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),72,4.074537,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),79,4.0726043929,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),68,4.2337779173,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),1,5.7953647319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),4,5.4474588734,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),4,5.4360501131,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),141,2.4412984579,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),139,2.809247644,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),113,3.5907731795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),87,3.922347,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),99,3.7281344286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),137,2.7249555337,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),134,2.9322342082,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),138,2.8279164206,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),148,2.5843889145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),62,4.2369093316,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),88,3.9079748846,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),86,3.9833015882,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),121,3.315129605,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),122,3.4254551631,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),131,2.9620187443,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),131,2.9924086076,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),139,2.9236384855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),85,3.8598204714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),107,3.5964477873,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),95,3.7643253307,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),41,4.5824676975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),87,3.9156054844,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),66,4.1759303705,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),65,4.2332765299,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),61,4.3346208352,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),7,5.3819479857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),10,5.3150487623,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),10,5.3087312809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),115,3.5018740899,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),113,3.5253723948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),97,3.7448189052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),88,3.8088136198,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),81,4.0285439696,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),91,3.8999618918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),91,3.7528722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),104,3.6275806207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),127,3.3412955189,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),26,4.9050671323,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),36,4.6576613067,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),49,4.487945959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),2,5.619557404,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),6,5.3822688164,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),7,5.319798603,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),108,3.5529441807,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),105,3.6224850214,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),111,3.6027850677,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),80,3.94450998,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),56,4.35288005,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),59,4.3638572683,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),139,2.553507,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),143,2.6761372286,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),141,2.913127284,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),58,4.2799015,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),53,4.38112,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),50,4.4783174978,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),89,3.7694600829,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),69,4.1539718022,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),77,4.0550586402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),126,3.1675355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),123,3.3975481,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ330,9.03 Impact of ICTs on new organizational models (1-7),110,3.6034645504,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",41,1.1733511654,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",41,1.119366392,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",44,1.0514759516,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",66,0.1912637938,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",61,0.2508513729,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",61,0.3256300257,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",58,0.2350097035,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",51,0.4204300547,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",53,0.4891839737,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",18,23.9530741989,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",19,20.7319795545,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",20,20.1495171107,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",14,31.6060590302,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",14,30.331844542,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",13,30.9808802238,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",80,0.05514744,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",75,0.1090146147,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",19,21.6642658899,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",18,23.1768503467,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",17,25.4090809978,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",92,0.0021806099,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",45,0.8308282536,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",43,0.9069645899,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",43,1.1283745999,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",71,0.1425015404,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",70,0.1320827736,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",52,0.5156909279,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",69,0.132973454,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",64,0.2279048228,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",75,0.1259390646,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",52,0.3361808622,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",56,0.3560960139,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",58,0.3837478321,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",34,2.706123696,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",34,1.7857295297,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",40,1.2533841372,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",41,1.2299759909,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",16,29.5435625321,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",15,29.7047180831,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",12,31.4357782729,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",7,60.4848212402,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",6,62.9300810517,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",6,61.6169033127,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",48,0.5160495235,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",50,0.5672846983,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",51,0.530439076,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",32,2.8890790899,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",29,3.9318614385,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CHN,China,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",28,4.855359927,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",74,0.1303779061,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",71,0.1148024258,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",87,0.0118168267,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",73,0.1328834455,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",76,0.0731769756,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",76,0.086194959,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",67,0.1851533178,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",63,0.2299752219,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",60,0.3316873599,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",31,2.9803580648,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",32,2.0386953437,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",73,0.1455424164,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",30,3.2456123966,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",31,2.5982769748,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",32,2.2757912054,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",10,45.6161291907,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",10,46.4538806269,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",10,45.9674655615,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",11,44.1158541319,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",11,41.2036021152,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",11,38.0053066429,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",72,0.1360981398,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",79,0.0503660605,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",80,0.0492727442,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",83,0.0429182486,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",82,0.0281942634,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",83,0.0264809736,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",91,0.0087648159,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",87,0.0155550681,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",78,0.1078827099,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",67,0.1704829671,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",70,0.1607595265,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",26,7.6455917912,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",26,8.4155905899,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",25,8.4139720089,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",21,16.3891025299,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",21,14.8924892855,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",22,11.8165553174,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",1,124.9625325766,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",1,126.5450307726,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",2,110.0556459515,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",15,31.5155778243,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",13,30.3637438274,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,FRA,France,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",14,30.5986019418,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",17,28.2019329461,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",17,25.7286861485,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",18,25.0508623821,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",59,0.2286430265,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",52,0.3930111391,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",57,0.3903287683,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",36,1.8588956751,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",37,1.4825488746,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",38,1.3742654557,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",85,0.0356287183,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",81,0.0347489379,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,,,, +2014,GUY,Guyana,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,HND,Honduras,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",37,1.7192398889,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",39,1.3203561189,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",37,1.4016726627,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",27,6.2998145904,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",28,5.4024082094,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",29,4.8430976519,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",94,0.0069147702,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",92,0.0058333137,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",88,0.0089180796,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",56,0.2731084723,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",57,0.3419828412,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IND,India,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",55,0.4184970045,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",13,33.7890992989,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",16,29.2273082815,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",15,29.9309418402,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",92,0.0085455889,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",83,0.0266611524,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",84,0.0184143461,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",25,8.4271461707,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",22,14.7105921204,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",21,13.8969867571,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",3,91.6009222221,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",4,81.2560200494,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",5,79.4031201904,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",24,8.7620896164,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",24,8.7400722967,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",26,8.1736201305,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",68,0.1830982718,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",60,0.224834656,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",68,0.1653712585,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",77,0.0808930594,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",4,88.05970404,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",2,106.6645801208,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",1,118.8866214437,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",57,0.2472472023,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",59,0.3063108552,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",65,0.2214347733,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",87,0.0253407135,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",89,0.0123418143,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",81,0.0452080738,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",6,68.3879867949,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",5,73.4769505944,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",4,87.7649395699,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",55,0.2834160782,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",73,0.0913498289,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",68,0.2000188818,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",51,0.3951244424,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",53,0.3883214665,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",50,0.5704129105,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",75,0.0786768195,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",69,0.1753822195,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",78,0.062541358,,,, +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",79,0.066885492,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",43,0.8829435362,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",55,0.3650945291,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",36,1.4850637241,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",20,17.1035586911,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",20,18.8029205266,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",19,23.0391261158,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",42,1.1055196385,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",35,1.6004111345,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",45,1.0425857617,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",64,0.1968984227,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",72,0.1140936916,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",72,0.1481623625,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",54,0.4212535326,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",63,0.2052127398,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",65,0.1976429174,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",66,0.2112983646,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",53,0.3241329807,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",62,0.2426521295,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",28,4.4153300258,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",46,0.8012916822,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",42,1.1999731206,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average,Assumed Value, ,22/01/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",79,0.0645190095,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",77,0.0650572035,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",29,4.0170389922,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",27,6.0980587924,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",27,6.1919608785,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",61,0.2230074065,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0.0016182479,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",94,0.0005260173,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",91,0.0041617709,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",5,69.3151014447,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",7,59.2782997018,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",7,55.7853560392,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",12,36.581105039,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",12,33.8846992001,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",16,28.5485283152,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",22,14.79809659,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",23,13.7046813864,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",23,11.8071549051,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",82,0.0460890492,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",66,0.1796987171,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",67,0.2066270075,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0.0072094268,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0.0047524853,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",90,0.0059602755,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",70,0.1444293179,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",60,0.2843477915,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",46,0.9357583198,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",85,0.0214950129,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",78,0.0684289341,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",76,0.1241324947,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",74,0.0885424515,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",74,0.1118209776,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",39,1.3343802691,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",36,1.5863657373,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",40,1.3171889051,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,PRT,Portugal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",33,2.7533429021,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",30,3.1411323547,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",30,3.3698228493,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",84,0.0394204127,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",80,0.0387323791,,,, +2014,PRY,Paraguay,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",54,0.3129371341,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",58,0.3316668496,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",31,2.8782219078,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",46,0.8059456647,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",48,0.7244404716,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",48,0.7292106676,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",40,1.2301846876,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",38,1.3742597144,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",34,1.5421546739,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average,Assumed Value, ,22/01/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",47,0.6752991816,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",44,0.8874328554,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",33,1.96968807,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",86,0.0275325886,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",84,0.0251332505,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",82,0.0359444993,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",8,58.5316784683,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",8,56.5054626958,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",9,51.0822462107,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",47,0.7371661769,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",59,0.3767385578,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",35,2.018493488,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",33,1.9520822733,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",35,1.5282351163,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",23,9.190129877,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",25,8.5860742349,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",24,8.7381720074,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",2,117.8310604758,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",3,105.0413030702,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",3,88.7742529877,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",62,0.2139778918,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",81,0.0498660026,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",77,0.1101482215,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",64,0.2028497599,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",69,0.1682279522,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",62,0.2834756381,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",50,0.4053332375,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",54,0.38515106,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",71,0.1500282803,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",65,0.1913474485,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",63,0.2498329242,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",44,0.870352742,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",45,0.8648717216,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",49,0.642064164,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,TZA,Tanzania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",86,0.0167256801,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",85,0.0161796216,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",49,0.4178058804,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",49,0.6377893548,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",47,0.8262026294,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",56,0.4162373757,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",9,48.5858408226,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",9,48.0277543133,,,, +2014,USA,United States,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",8,51.6402007315,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",89,0.0116877402,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",90,0.0115604263,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",89,0.0076269571,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",88,0.0163568399,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",88,0.0129417896,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",86,0.0157483303,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",38,1.4070764187,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",42,1.0455986008,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",39,1.3622636454,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",90,0.0100208498,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",91,0.0099431617,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,PCTICTPATENTPC,"9.02 ICT PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),134,3.1450834547,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),137,3.272727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),76,4.3695754335,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),93,4.0841205,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),121,3.6366801,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),15,5.4361344729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),11,5.5070280556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),4,5.590614,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),75,4.3819973158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),94,4.0836311081,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),116,3.7423608439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),109,3.8613201043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),70,4.4331725135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),46,4.734731,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),27,5.2113184692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),28,5.1218037143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),22,5.146616992,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),22,5.3784468794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),33,5.0368441417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),36,4.8775738765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),46,4.8385779892,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),41,4.8686092754,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),43,4.8036734167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),136,3.1217135739,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),139,2.9817719041,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),144,2.9067140574,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),37,5.0281181778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),31,5.0684101682,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),30,5.0108386314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),85,4.2126023143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),64,4.5323233154,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),99,3.9501888325,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),94,4.1150460861,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),107,3.8471086296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),89,4.1050170112,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),100,3.9953421772,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),100,3.9842322742,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),112,3.8247193962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),88,4.1887617959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),96,4.0648279195,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),104,3.9115488478,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),30,5.1885364409,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),35,5.0063250414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),49,4.7268400821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),118,3.632539,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),104,3.88250025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),91,4.087014,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),130,3.313088,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),119,3.6313707015,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),129,3.5178712497,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),107,3.8780422192,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),29,5.20706543,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),34,5.0106951973,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),51,4.6836868992,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),49,4.8135582211,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),63,4.5497411055,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),74,4.3293928878,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),87,4.1981286886,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),71,4.4090199815,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),66,4.4660202923,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),110,3.86774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),114,3.7995083321,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),108,3.8228191,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),120,3.6417937365,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),14,5.4575554021,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),23,5.261286798,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),28,5.0638533962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),9,5.639966034,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),18,5.3498311408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),18,5.2618205067,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),25,5.2438700604,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),30,5.0708983686,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),29,5.017470575,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),38,4.990995324,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),49,4.721305709,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),52,4.6386141429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),82,4.2737821821,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),86,4.2131138054,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),95,4.0385794532,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),93,4.119489126,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),101,3.9359100931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),97,4.0244381497,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),55,4.7433393012,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),67,4.4986563028,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),62,4.5475642102,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),65,4.5407398106,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),68,4.4913043099,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),79,4.2703181468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),40,4.9637207702,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),48,4.7409039461,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),45,4.7536741755,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),54,4.7434899356,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),65,4.5123342017,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),76,4.2906757261,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),74,4.4195569532,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),82,4.2889238718,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),78,4.2800121676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),24,5.3503990822,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),20,5.3221951441,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),15,5.3318631242,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),17,5.4239722794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),17,5.3610528621,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),33,4.9465728804,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),51,4.7752696794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),53,4.6865110345,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),57,4.5807880619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),141,2.4592617652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),144,2.3824656,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),145,2.8915895439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),95,4.0854412306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),89,4.166692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),83,4.2242361706,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),86,4.204851299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),98,4.0104409799,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),101,3.941451509,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),42,4.9149687321,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),38,4.925372918,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),27,5.10252324,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),7,5.6984659417,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),7,5.5464231449,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),9,5.493375822,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),127,3.4669902396,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),124,3.597599075,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),132,3.4139692228,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),11,5.6027263794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),1,5.885967313,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),1,5.8287640158,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),6,5.7131014312,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),10,5.5099225761,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),21,5.2062014995,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),121,3.620766,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),127,3.5230557346,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),3,5.8735649231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),2,5.8529103231,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),6,5.5520949318,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),105,3.9283267351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),102,3.918207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),102,3.925254655,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),79,4.3193409509,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),80,4.3268659571,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),75,4.3192341557,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),133,3.27804,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),136,3.2766741,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),73,4.4245018144,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),58,4.63356265,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),61,4.5528387558,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),99,3.9955545244,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),117,3.7011689851,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),129,3.5035482201,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),45,4.8625192813,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),60,4.595176282,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),58,4.5712729225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),101,3.9797714765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),95,4.0731003145,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),93,4.0658061829,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),23,5.3517632452,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),19,5.339145,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),19,5.2556862233,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),69,4.4898262409,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),84,4.2346277807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),109,3.8698518879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),89,4.18117535,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),76,4.3567109681,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),64,4.521394415,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),128,3.432603,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),135,3.2665895014,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),139,3.2022472255,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),83,4.2466354191,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),73,4.3649657869,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),65,4.4951194738,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),71,4.4581171,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),66,4.499289169,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),38,4.8507367086,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),35,5.0497766547,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),36,4.9911140757,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),40,4.812331087,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),36,5.0379101175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),24,5.2274660505,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),14,5.3528650034,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),98,4.0083106156,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),91,4.1281623873,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),106,3.8960212217,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),12,5.4846442715,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),32,5.0447056724,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),31,5.0078511,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),19,5.4054657659,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),21,5.3103075745,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),26,5.1222228865,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),81,4.2884622549,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),90,4.147002762,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),111,3.8380533517,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),70,4.4653898102,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),83,4.2405710305,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),85,4.179735339,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),67,4.4945751937,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),47,4.7517454762,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),35,4.881407,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),28,5.20992179,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),27,5.1430816389,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),20,5.2408016177,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),106,3.917724,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),92,4.1131130089,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),80,4.2584796929,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),56,4.7417739561,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),46,4.7786356259,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),41,4.8077999736,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),129,3.3994438758,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),136,3.23814035,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),138,3.2538346425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),77,4.3362473525,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),79,4.340148487,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),77,4.2831405588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),2,5.9387639667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),3,5.8075498667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),2,5.6965329877,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),120,3.6289361264,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),128,3.5252802747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),135,3.3172630189,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),73,4.3461,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),125,3.5625086308,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),134,3.2776891023,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),134,3.3808521039,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),126,3.532932,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),133,3.3932528514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),141,2.930665,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),148,2.4804927333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),48,4.8242146069,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),40,4.916654,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),48,4.7282869878,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),137,3.1047386146,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),142,2.8154302625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),142,3.0426048398,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),26,5.2199617778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),29,5.0795553921,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),32,4.9620502408,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),31,5.1874147952,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),9,5.5131169625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),5,5.5674861353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),84,4.2206573127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),78,4.3416034978,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),68,4.3867682718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),113,3.808419,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),87,4.1939901164,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),86,4.1745093541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),123,3.6019936521,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),114,3.7376811727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),117,3.7419484991,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),116,3.7333496609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),125,3.5685655944,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),114,3.7615861775,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),58,4.6875841045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),54,4.6736778915,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),55,4.5881084569,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),110,3.8456493655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),110,3.8104209221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),81,4.2454384491,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),90,4.1652107578,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),74,4.3607668143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),63,4.5360682429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),21,5.3956712778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),15,5.4082886182,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),25,5.13152508,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),140,3.138578,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),61,4.6608262038,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),59,4.6280592558,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),71,4.3574679299,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),66,4.5190664818,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),72,4.4054919586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),92,4.0772566468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),104,3.9656212355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),111,3.8062697931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),122,3.629610977,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),138,3.0210903786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),131,3.3861331745,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),141,3.0898348824,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),62,4.6267308661,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),56,4.6644165527,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),59,4.5658881708,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),102,3.97418706,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),116,3.73042516,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),115,3.7474964879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),13,5.4814935198,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),13,5.4751481488,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),13,5.4179578892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),124,3.588650641,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),115,3.7325753701,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),94,4.0606690124,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),53,4.7529697831,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),52,4.6956610383,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),56,4.5853120526,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),121,3.6223330841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),113,3.7394995059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),126,3.5495834863,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),16,5.4314867839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),8,5.5235118923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),7,5.5487370899,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),8,5.6478670303,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),14,5.4589707975,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),11,5.4237269028,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),122,3.61849069,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),122,3.6149590769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),131,3.45785625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),32,5.1782161723,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),25,5.2119160821,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),17,5.265184713,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),47,4.8380643581,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),55,4.6652557324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),50,4.721504,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),97,4.0143172132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),106,3.8610079542,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),98,3.9789854708,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),44,4.8840922598,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),51,4.7096029978,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),37,4.8586178654,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),52,4.7648559989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),62,4.5519192316,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),72,4.3521065185,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),68,4.49084292,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),43,4.81872394,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),42,4.8045354326,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),91,4.1587981367,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),97,4.0111313941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),105,3.8993847783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),60,4.6865195926,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),50,4.7170987791,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),44,4.7913014969,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),20,5.4022556176,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),22,5.27382849,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),23,5.1450100093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),107,3.9065094237,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),99,3.9986236966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),82,4.2326176986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),18,5.408048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),12,5.4887176091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),8,5.5465031546,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),103,3.9736370371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),105,3.8662934552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),103,3.923532204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),112,3.841641603,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),123,3.6134447839,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),113,3.769822661,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),39,4.9716630205,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),45,4.7821,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),34,4.9230438678,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),33,5.100806,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),26,5.1631710462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),24,5.1403313043,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),43,4.9063426398,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),39,4.9194324739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),54,4.6022075167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),5,5.7718908905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),6,5.5926229576,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),10,5.4750402177,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),132,3.384597,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),123,3.6255443,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),72,4.4476223571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),88,4.1930581484,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),88,4.1105604949,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),131,3.2434600124,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),130,3.3929525,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),124,3.5691188477,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),132,3.211165,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),127,3.5316430085,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),119,3.6900338724,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),80,4.3014283357,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),77,4.3452987904,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),84,4.1979488396,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),63,4.606391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),69,4.4841798114,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),69,4.3712486885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),1,6.2223104435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),4,5.7082419872,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),3,5.6862426598,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),140,2.5809641789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),140,2.9327033033,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),130,3.4976285807,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),57,4.658913,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),87,4.1717183587,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),139,2.8715462872,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),133,3.2032575498,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),137,3.1710049743,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),147,2.7606709101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),64,4.5548379035,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),85,4.2343364192,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),67,4.4435794584,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),115,3.7538228352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),109,3.8199994652,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),135,3.1273952721,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),138,3.1567805697,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),143,2.9486736072,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),111,3.8429674524,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),119,3.6428903221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),118,3.7106115823,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),50,4.783043794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),96,4.0368618796,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),59,4.6872830657,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),61,4.569428789,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),53,4.6324513084,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),4,5.8480130925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),5,5.6557398087,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),12,5.4199150851,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),117,3.6792777393,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),112,3.8015209016,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),108,3.8702922675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),78,4.3338169143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),75,4.3603985424,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),90,4.0964240656,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),96,4.07893055,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),103,3.9002848066,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),125,3.5551834189,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),34,5.051646013,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),42,4.8291816,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),60,4.5569581803,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),10,5.6207271702,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),16,5.3961688259,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),16,5.2796129648,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),108,3.869825106,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),118,3.6920145214,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),128,3.5213257065,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),41,4.92225712,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),37,4.9781397,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),39,4.8422809902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),142,2.184985,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),143,2.5468028095,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),146,2.771582672,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),57,4.6905388,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),44,4.7994930735,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),47,4.7328163272,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),92,4.1406924714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),81,4.2972697868,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),70,4.3632343542,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),126,3.4691974667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),120,3.6360202667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ347,9.01 Impact of ICTs on new services and products (1-7),100,3.9478802397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),135,2.2606610042,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),137,2.4040403333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),75,3.1832361321,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),88,2.9865590927,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),125,2.6000322289,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),29,4.0863933488,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),28,4.1343911152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),27,4.1876588788,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),82,3.0689785061,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),91,2.9636711585,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),87,3.0658336053,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),90,2.9828050454,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),69,3.2580149922,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),47,3.485625097,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),20,4.7456076736,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),20,4.6139513909,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),23,4.573948054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),19,4.7552850757,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),22,4.5671693971,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),24,4.5104378738,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),68,3.2660256113,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),59,3.3530776916,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),42,3.550470039,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),138,2.1907269507,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),141,2.2260075868,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),144,2.1840218277,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),22,4.6517243663,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),19,4.6721051235,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),20,4.6654415142,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),101,2.8844059607,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),87,3.0069010128,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),119,2.6865422426,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),109,2.7533390768,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),118,2.6975606346,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),108,2.8532342105,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),125,2.5258637715,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),128,2.5195716047,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),130,2.5025275143,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),69,3.2593294627,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),75,3.1996712114,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),73,3.1988015887,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),54,3.4432680769,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),52,3.3934664426,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),63,3.3548004242,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),111,2.7308206667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),96,2.9039199651,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),88,3.043999233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),123,2.5641929605,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),117,2.6497563732,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),123,2.6184576929,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),111,2.7871104128,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),52,3.4610078981,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),50,3.4038329982,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),64,3.3390015407,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),26,4.3183122837,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),27,4.2443136557,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),57,3.3978726012,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),64,3.2827870207,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),48,3.4269495724,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),51,3.4806211445,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),112,2.7811723478,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),113,2.7019721248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),114,2.7296162145,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),120,2.6844498182,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),17,5.0192623436,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),16,4.9264934162,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),17,4.8697677644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),3,5.9172817821,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),5,5.8025494285,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),3,5.6369331162,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),35,3.7808220853,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),35,3.7291016685,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),43,3.5495241286,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),79,3.1506864367,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),83,3.0791042023,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),81,3.1115207474,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),103,2.8442231426,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),93,2.9268573905,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),102,2.9153350771,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),105,2.8436893358,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),104,2.8390121337,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),103,2.8822651761,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),58,3.3605927902,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),70,3.2394241987,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),75,3.1639199295,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),74,3.2039394367,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),76,3.1978975173,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),83,3.0911683397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),45,3.5521212578,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),46,3.4975622549,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),52,3.4684984333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),43,3.5859939576,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),45,3.4994949507,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),45,3.491737072,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),38,3.7147036281,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),40,3.6616747884,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),38,3.6264933623,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),13,5.3070500273,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),10,5.3187945701,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),8,5.2226400417,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),8,5.4838633402,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),9,5.3262959908,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),16,4.9361717092,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),76,3.1633717942,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),79,3.1649637378,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),71,3.2207819302,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),140,2.1010066115,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),143,2.0797082272,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),133,2.4399721031,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),97,2.9223498687,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),90,2.9700275604,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),95,2.98624901,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),62,3.3286922185,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),67,3.2767608886,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),59,3.384763923,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),33,3.8588028867,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),32,3.8612909017,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),31,3.9732130538,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),21,4.6539644096,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),23,4.5513399,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),22,4.5836963731,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),128,2.4337084982,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),127,2.5329659508,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),128,2.5683111189,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),5,5.8383972024,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),1,5.9855348948,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),1,6.0391572241,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),15,5.0793065323,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),17,4.9233942575,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),19,4.7688993605,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),129,2.4393576667,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),136,2.4124025813,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),14,5.1775229088,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),14,5.0896517139,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),14,5.0071281506,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),100,2.9070447827,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),97,2.8950226737,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),100,2.9460399267,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),88,2.9925676146,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),85,3.0402319231,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),85,3.0778191492,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),131,2.4010223333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),148,2.038033644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),78,3.1587925632,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),63,3.3139165193,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),67,3.2739648601,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),73,3.2078624102,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),80,3.1216758861,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),91,3.0298500881,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),48,3.505638151,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),57,3.3616947716,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),94,2.992973472,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),114,2.6929440562,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),107,2.7991565351,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),106,2.8662694137,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),16,5.0534104134,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),15,5.0328555996,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),13,5.030549498,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),85,3.0129425542,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),98,2.8852493415,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),116,2.7491234136,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),61,3.3297534752,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),55,3.382233133,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),40,3.5569440466,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),129,2.415802,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),134,2.3692059315,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),138,2.3851430533,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),44,3.5639913815,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),41,3.6575334516,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),36,3.6827755356,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),106,2.8406002044,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),101,2.8548058611,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),86,3.0662930119,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),41,3.6377183695,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),43,3.6317171271,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),50,3.4833623085,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),18,4.8229450473,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),18,4.7722959545,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),18,4.827446254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),107,2.7621886729,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),106,2.817960349,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),114,2.7677246906,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),23,4.5810116281,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),24,4.5380906308,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),25,4.5103634926,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),6,5.7048700538,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),6,5.6281251152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),4,5.6351134543,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),36,3.7434139201,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),37,3.6911012152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),58,3.395828378,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),81,3.1289734248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),81,3.1030440267,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),78,3.1291723038,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),70,3.2276125824,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),49,3.4168110959,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),44,3.5276632303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),10,5.3657604918,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),8,5.3596534943,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),11,5.1192925269,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),80,3.147903229,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),66,3.279146365,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),60,3.3757009921,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),56,3.4121804534,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),47,3.4648241333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),55,3.4232303033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),120,2.5902935739,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),126,2.5639237401,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),131,2.5008582711,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),126,2.519049615,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),124,2.6177436532,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),117,2.6966363326,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),12,5.3129990906,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),12,5.2382032823,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),7,5.2483219609,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),110,2.7340336811,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),125,2.6039077959,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),127,2.5774380263,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),74,3.1812696667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),92,2.9715224102,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),102,2.8519503366,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),101,2.9167785517,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),110,2.7510716667,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),134,2.4338921112,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),137,2.3347445607,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),145,2.1162471556,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),63,3.3027020506,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),62,3.3278813243,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),66,3.3037548166,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),139,2.1127654644,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),144,2.0312598506,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),147,2.0844996659,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),30,4.0725554672,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),30,4.0148923016,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),28,4.107025184,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),27,4.2773724621,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),25,4.4717517301,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),10,5.1594568949,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),42,3.6219496625,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),38,3.6844054821,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),35,3.7105486416,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),127,2.4883473886,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),122,2.6462416937,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),123,2.6389881133,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),91,2.9826336384,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),84,3.047773237,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),76,3.1620872194,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),134,2.2870752065,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),139,2.2511358489,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),135,2.4174297264,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),71,3.2232278769,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),72,3.2313360144,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),80,3.1204757942,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),87,2.9938986008,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),92,2.961274841,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),65,3.3066131401,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),86,3.005903798,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),71,3.2335527528,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),69,3.253944916,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),28,4.1101784522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),31,3.9963417551,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),29,4.0343317931,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),139,2.3666833333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),39,3.7025043435,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),39,3.6665824394,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),39,3.6018317929,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),84,3.0383144765,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),86,3.0202382533,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),89,3.0391051975,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),104,2.8438393171,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),116,2.7080417586,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),121,2.6695815079,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),137,2.2501446865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),130,2.4221126475,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),142,2.3168285196,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),83,3.0598698315,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),82,3.0967165234,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),70,3.247857052,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),99,2.9134729711,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),112,2.743989088,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),110,2.7924670144,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),31,3.9746796576,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),29,4.0168187961,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),30,4.0127212397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),116,2.6804660586,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),117,2.6985456175,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),105,2.8769343083,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),60,3.3308280474,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),65,3.2842389862,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),72,3.2044587018,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),118,2.6268723068,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),120,2.6653499328,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),122,2.6543212766,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),4,5.8911264708,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),4,5.9298401555,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),5,5.6348357011,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),11,5.325201236,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),13,5.1684819063,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),15,4.9976436513,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),132,2.3311727996,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),135,2.3608691152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),141,2.3194379408,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),25,4.4986672898,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),26,4.4705548316,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),26,4.4360100151,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),55,3.436396324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),61,3.3382841406,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),56,3.4074888429,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),94,2.9531363154,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),99,2.8849979115,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),98,2.9559893404,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),65,3.2762743742,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),73,3.2178547486,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),46,3.4897059916,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),72,3.2194945745,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),77,3.1957507538,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),84,3.0780460943,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),77,3.1594105287,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),56,3.3675482497,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),48,3.4854699892,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),57,3.3689751408,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),64,3.3112372461,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),62,3.3564337215,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),24,4.5023725895,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),21,4.581115509,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),21,4.6563295917,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),37,3.7412996053,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),36,3.7024559616,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),34,3.8733133345,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),112,2.7189723653,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),109,2.7553285454,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),99,2.9465554838,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),34,3.8098424661,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),33,3.8525739698,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),32,3.9543031123,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),98,2.9193759673,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),94,2.9205824327,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),97,2.9616479548,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),53,3.4497365516,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),54,3.3830033145,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),41,3.5560787216,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),50,3.4871987329,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),58,3.354979,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),53,3.4535743322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),40,3.6396797334,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),42,3.6361335496,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),37,3.649757429,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),46,3.5348121648,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),60,3.348510679,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),82,3.1020412058,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),2,6.140079007,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),2,5.9774257609,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),6,5.6259804078,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),133,2.3724433333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),124,2.63000375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),93,2.9597343539,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),103,2.8502523738,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),109,2.8359714531,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),108,2.7606230863,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),105,2.8261007537,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),93,2.9970276738,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),119,2.5945234043,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),113,2.7421708938,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),107,2.8592540888,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),49,3.5029302308,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),44,3.5403295645,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),54,3.4396023201,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),32,3.8726599394,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),34,3.8215423078,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),33,3.9182835967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),1,6.1481134474,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),3,5.9326198687,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),2,6.0252968101,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),142,2.0147080865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),140,2.2473169824,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),118,2.6961339201,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),78,3.1937533333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),77,3.1558236776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),136,2.2579257237,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),130,2.3784972527,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),138,2.3329737983,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),146,2.1150199415,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),96,2.9291827831,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),108,2.7690816475,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),104,2.8813577558,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),115,2.6896508134,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),111,2.7484848761,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),131,2.3631380055,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),132,2.3830630591,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),143,2.2988700015,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),89,2.9901123833,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),100,2.8735257181,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),92,3.0169306776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),51,3.4616870048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),90,3.0301808039,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),67,3.2748974569,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),68,3.2591617428,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),68,3.2728280114,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),7,5.6149805391,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),7,5.4853942855,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),12,5.07812159,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),133,2.3010407431,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),136,2.3378942518,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),132,2.4525456257,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),121,2.5883608923,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),121,2.6499388867,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),126,2.5950762739,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),66,3.2758970317,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),74,3.2051858716,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),79,3.1227481332,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),47,3.5063710519,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),53,3.3889034922,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),61,3.36486777,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),9,5.4730099424,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),11,5.3172665324,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),9,5.2013037029,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),95,2.9405173838,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),95,2.9134404312,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),115,2.7555327668,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),102,2.8543450294,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),89,2.9703139516,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),96,2.9789406379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),141,2.08155038,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),142,2.2026623896,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),140,2.3523381936,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),59,3.3575581836,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),51,3.4003019123,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),49,3.4841920371,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),122,2.5771086783,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),115,2.712380937,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),113,2.7783599596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),124,2.5459189245,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),119,2.6781875609,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D.09,Pillar 9. Economic impacts (1-7),129,2.5437684484,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),126,3.411765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),106,3.857095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),1,6.107162,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),2,6.107162,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),128,3.218637,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),141,3.0921042561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),52,4.667045,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),46,4.6365371128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),39,4.842206,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),48,4.603603328,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),58,4.555201,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),56,4.5353829868,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),8,5.562889,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),8,5.5725213083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),138,2.773316,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),145,2.9865487842,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),63,4.513388,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),68,4.4059401586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),132,3.128735,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),129,3.3747780586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),36,4.9,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),80,4.2294270143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),72,4.383117,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),76,4.2720920777,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),102,3.852454,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),111,3.7714729851,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),6,5.728571,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),12,5.4653692764,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),85,4.082199,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),89,4.082199,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),115,3.559814,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),119,3.5537207945,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),81,4.202246,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),88,4.0945124739,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),48,4.710721,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),57,4.5169400829,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),31,4.9905,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),21,5.0238025487,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),61,4.470134,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),83,4.164081,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),84,4.148596085,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),38,4.843463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),51,4.5692085771,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),27,5.077897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),33,4.8993023833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),57,4.59059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),54,4.54086725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),46,4.744793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),37,4.7982559524,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),91,4.035515,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),98,3.9483470832,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),65,4.498175,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),72,4.3320567804,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),84,4.117964,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),74,4.3050722551,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),37,4.854525,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),38,4.7419503106,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),56,4.608181,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),65,4.4400811814,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),101,3.888102,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),96,3.9596199803,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),103,3.794509,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),116,3.584604831,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),23,5.107758,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),34,4.8792690428,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),67,4.457463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),50,4.5749909468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),80,4.21632,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),85,4.1311321333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),137,2.84375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),136,3.193435101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),62,4.467334,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),92,4.024455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),131,3.3006105429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),87,4.060395,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),101,3.93561018,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),14,5.351874,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),13,5.4619321085,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),105,3.762025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),97,3.9517078633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),12,5.435181,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),16,5.3027369632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),60,4.537817,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),63,4.4559852469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),86,4.062691,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),95,3.9609698262,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),28,5.062179,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),39,4.7285943409,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),71,4.391901,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),55,4.613969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),58,4.4958471812,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),88,4.056914,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),105,3.8648033862,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),16,5.218152,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),27,5.0069284883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),136,2.917183,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),140,3.1157296138,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),110,3.704071,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),115,3.610634358,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),53,4.666766,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),55,4.5361415972,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),19,5.186353,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),17,5.2327036651,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),131,3.19335,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),146,2.9397185816,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),104,3.775494,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),110,3.8047304979,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),133,3.095922,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),138,3.1596199533,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),120,3.501543,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),117,3.5837148021,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),61,4.530868,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),53,4.5455631314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),24,5.095464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),29,4.9413487855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),43,4.766359,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),41,4.7208568256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),82,4.17866,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),102,3.8785182892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),62,4.516198,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),66,4.4346862755,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),18,5.200735,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),19,5.0855198757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),130,3.208896,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),144,3.0519082041,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),66,4.486874,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),75,4.2847248691,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),34,4.932574,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),30,4.932574,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),68,4.445548,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),45,4.6602340261,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),17,5.215392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),26,5.0090072571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),30,4.995559,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),31,4.9296806453,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),127,3.230868,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),143,3.085221265,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),47,4.725998,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),52,4.555958,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),11,5.507099,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),14,5.4409690212,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),129,3.216216,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),133,3.2647493514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),49,4.58524,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),139,2.727192,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),148,2.7002870571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),78,4.245704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),108,3.8322951216,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),116,3.544758,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),147,2.8908278667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),18,5.095889,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),119,3.505361,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),142,3.0900288672,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),54,4.647431,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),44,4.6694741061,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),9,5.561814,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),6,5.7536201529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),98,3.967469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),99,3.9475044462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),42,4.825,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),59,4.4877109639,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),79,4.217411,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),82,4.1716390205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),118,3.508279,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),113,3.7354881357,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),75,4.339199,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),81,4.1952428873,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),33,4.972733,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),32,4.9237535462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),40,4.839289,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),43,4.685982101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),5,5.773874,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),5,5.84177285,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),125,3.414478,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),59,4.539073,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),64,4.4483366597,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),94,4.01755,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),103,3.8698182965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),90,4.049513,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),92,4.0343176646,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),109,3.716659,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),132,3.2798238529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),22,5.110404,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),35,4.8680319083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),93,4.019972,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),104,3.8653444741,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),10,5.525182,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),9,5.5587917811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),99,3.92464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),93,3.9915861366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),89,4.055812,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),78,4.2664400413,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),112,3.688893,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),122,3.4759582952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),26,5.084923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),25,5.0094537503,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),21,5.149543,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),20,5.0411398126,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),106,3.7439,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),118,3.5765427,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),25,5.094117,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),23,5.0193954141,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),15,5.318027,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),15,5.318027,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),77,4.257068,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),91,4.0774604292,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),20,5.17768,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),22,5.0211529118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),96,3.976585,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),107,3.8493522852,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),71,4.387337,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),70,4.3919915551,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),117,3.54388,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),123,3.4187023783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),49,4.698704,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),73,4.3278025602,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),29,5.048923,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),24,5.0122228209,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),126,3.33451,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),127,3.4005722377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),2,5.984349,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),3,5.9687155987,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),107,3.739878,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),114,3.7016824478,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),108,3.73417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),100,3.9381614805,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),1,6.22907,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),3,5.970166,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),7,5.6897964581,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),44,4.760015,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),47,4.6238673677,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),4,5.965996,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),4,5.9146770012,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),76,4.261897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),87,4.12404885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),123,3.378956,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),112,3.7404354564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),125,3.372487,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),128,3.3833897467,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),111,3.690079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),120,3.5021966345,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),113,3.602042,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),121,3.5000046484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),74,4.355874,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),86,4.1269111163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),13,5.386023,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),10,5.4690279811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),135,3.054191,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),124,3.4178900614,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),35,4.90651,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),42,4.7027435111,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),121,3.493524,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),130,3.3130344304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),95,3.98192,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),94,3.9854943099,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),45,4.747166,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),114,3.588235,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),137,3.1780267638,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),70,4.421716,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),79,4.2391429965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),83,4.1496028677,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),64,4.511339,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),69,4.403702514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),7,5.629669,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),11,5.4676612596,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),73,4.374151,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),77,4.2664496628,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),50,4.68212,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),60,4.4786029967,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),122,3.444307,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),135,3.2430839825,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),69,4.436374,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),67,4.4213053225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),32,4.978501,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),28,4.9587949095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),134,3.078947,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),139,3.1307300968,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),41,4.836664,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),36,4.8601672976,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),124,3.377358,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),134,3.252038736,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),100,3.914311,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),109,3.828671288,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),51,4.673527,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),40,4.7216828927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),97,3.967735,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ363,8.03 Government success in ICT promotion (1-7),90,4.0774869207,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.3397,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.3333,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ALB,Albania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",73,0.3111,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",87,0.4248,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.4248,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.2508,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ARG,Argentina,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",43,0.4127,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.5294,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.5294,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ARM,Armenia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.1746,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.3268,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",109,0.3268,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AUS,Australia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.7651,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AUT,Austria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",33,0.4762,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",26,0.7451,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",26,0.7451,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.3238,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.366,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",98,0.366,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BDI,Burundi,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",133,0.0413,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",134,0.1503,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",137,0.1503,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BEL,Belgium,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",17,0.6254,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",39,0.6471,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",39,0.6471,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BEN,Benin,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",123,0.1175,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.1961,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",130,0.1961,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.1556,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.2941,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",120,0.2941,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",58,0.3556,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",83,0.4444,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",84,0.4444,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.4095,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.4902,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.4902,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.7302,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.2762,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",95,0.3725,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.3725,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BLZ,Belize,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",116,0.1587,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.3048,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",91,0.4118,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.4118,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BRA,Brazil,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.3683,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.6732,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.6732,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BRB,Barbados,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",104,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",95,0.3725,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",96,0.3725,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",85,0.2825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.5948,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.5948,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",102,0.3529,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,BWA,Botswana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",104,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",100,0.3595,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",101,0.3595,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CAN,Canada,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",3,0.8825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",6,0.8889,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",6,0.8889,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",37,0.4444,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.6732,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.6732,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CHL,Chile,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",18,0.6095,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.7516,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.7516,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CHN,China,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.3683,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CHN,China,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.5294,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CHN,China,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",59,0.5294,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.3238,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",104,0.3333,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.3333,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",118,0.1524,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.3007,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",116,0.3007,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,COL,Colombia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.7111,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",16,0.8431,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",16,0.8431,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",89,0.2698,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",84,0.4379,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",85,0.4379,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.3048,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.4967,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.4967,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",52,0.3714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.5621,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.5621,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",36,0.454,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.5425,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.5425,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DEU,Germany,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.5492,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.7516,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.7516,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DNK,Denmark,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.673,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.8562,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.8562,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",57,0.3651,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,DZA,Algeria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",126,0.0984,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",120,0.2549,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",123,0.2549,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.3175,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.4575,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",80,0.4575,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,EGY,Egypt,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",23,0.5302,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",42,0.6013,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",42,0.6013,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ESP,Spain,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.7651,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",23,0.7582,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",23,0.7582,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,EST,Estonia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",27,0.5016,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",18,0.8235,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",18,0.8235,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",104,0.2,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",75,0.4706,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.4706,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,FIN,Finland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.4794,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",7,0.8824,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",7,0.8824,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,FRA,France,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",11,0.6825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,FRA,France,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.8758,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,FRA,France,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",8,0.8758,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GAB,Gabon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",128,0.1895,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",131,0.1895,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",4,0.7746,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",4,0.9739,2010,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",4,0.9739,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GEO,Georgia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.2476,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",42,0.6013,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",42,0.6013,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GHA,Ghana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",119,0.1492,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.3007,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",116,0.3007,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GIN,Guinea,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",140,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",144,0,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",130,0.0825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.3203,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.3203,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GRC,Greece,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",58,0.3556,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.5752,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.5752,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",75,0.3079,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.4641,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.4641,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,GUY,Guyana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",108,0.181,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",120,0.2549,,,,15/03/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",123,0.2549,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,HND,Honduras,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.2952,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",93,0.3791,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.3791,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HRV,Croatia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",40,0.4222,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",40,0.6405,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",40,0.6405,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HTI,Haiti,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",136,0.019,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",138,0.0915,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",142,0.0915,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,HUN,Hungary,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",26,0.5048,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.6863,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.6863,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",99,0.2444,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.4967,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.4967,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IND,India,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.3683,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IND,India,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IND,India,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IRL,Ireland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.4984,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",90,0.2667,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.4902,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.4902,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ISL,Iceland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.3968,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.5425,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.5425,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ISR,Israel,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.5841,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.8497,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.8497,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ITA,Italy,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",84,0.2889,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.5752,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.5752,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",102,0.2286,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",112,0.3072,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",115,0.3072,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,JOR,Jordan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",22,0.5333,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.3922,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",93,0.3922,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,JPN,Japan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.673,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",9,0.8627,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.527,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.7843,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.7843,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KEN,Kenya,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",100,0.2381,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",85,0.4314,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",86,0.4314,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",70,0.3175,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",87,0.4248,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.4248,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",120,0.1365,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",128,0.1895,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",131,0.1895,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",35,0.4603,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.5817,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",47,0.5817,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.2157,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",90,0.2667,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",74,0.4771,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",74,0.4771,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LBR,Liberia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",128,0.1895,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",131,0.1895,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LBY,Libya,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",140,0,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",144,0,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.2603,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",93,0.3791,,,, +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",94,0.3791,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.2635,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.3007,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",116,0.3007,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",29,0.4825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",29,0.6993,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",29,0.6993,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",51,0.381,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",29,0.6993,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",29,0.6993,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,LVA,Latvia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.4159,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",45,0.5882,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",45,0.5882,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MAR,Morocco,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",100,0.2381,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",122,0.2484,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",125,0.2484,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MDA,Moldova,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.2952,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",61,0.5163,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",61,0.5163,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",115,0.1651,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.3203,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.3203,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MEX,Mexico,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.4413,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.732,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",28,0.732,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",69,0.3206,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",82,0.451,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",83,0.451,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MLI,Mali,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.1841,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",107,0.3203,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.3203,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MLT,Malta,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",34,0.4698,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.6144,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.6144,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",140,0.1046,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",72,0.3143,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",64,0.5098,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",64,0.5098,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",20,0.5556,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",45,0.5882,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",45,0.5882,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.1714,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.366,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",98,0.366,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",128,0.0889,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",139,0.0784,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",143,0.0784,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",81,0.2952,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",85,0.4314,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",86,0.4314,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MWI,Malawi,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",138,0.0159,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",125,0.2157,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.2157,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",16,0.6317,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",20,0.7908,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",20,0.7908,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NAM,Namibia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",131,0.0667,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.3007,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",116,0.3007,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.0952,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0.2222,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",126,0.2222,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",95,0.254,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.3137,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.3137,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",12,0.6794,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.9608,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",5,0.9608,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NOR,Norway,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",7,0.7365,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.8562,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",13,0.8562,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NPL,Nepal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",114,0.1683,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",119,0.2876,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",122,0.2876,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",15,0.6381,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.7843,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",21,0.7843,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,OMN,Oman,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",53,0.3683,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",35,0.6667,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",35,0.6667,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.2476,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",97,0.366,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",98,0.366,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PAN,Panama,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",85,0.2825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.4641,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.4641,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PER,Peru,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",44,0.4095,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",61,0.5163,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",61,0.5163,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PHL,Philippines,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.3937,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.4967,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",67,0.4967,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,POL,Poland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",49,0.3873,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",55,0.5359,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,PRT,Portugal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",49,0.3873,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.6536,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",38,0.6536,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",92,0.2635,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.4575,,,,15/03/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",80,0.4575,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,QAT,Qatar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",87,0.2794,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",27,0.7386,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",27,0.7386,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ROU,Romania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",41,0.4159,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",61,0.5163,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",61,0.5163,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.3302,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",37,0.6601,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",37,0.6601,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.1746,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",103,0.3399,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",105,0.3399,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",73,0.3111,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.7974,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",19,0.7974,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SEN,Senegal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",109,0.1778,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",102,0.3464,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",104,0.3464,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SGP,Singapore,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",10,0.6857,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",132,0.1699,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",135,0.1699,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",39,0.4254,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.6732,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",32,0.6732,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SRB,Serbia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",103,0.2222,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.5752,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",48,0.5752,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SUR,Suriname,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",135,0.0222,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",133,0.1634,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",136,0.1634,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",60,0.346,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.5033,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",66,0.5033,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",46,0.4,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",35,0.6667,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",35,0.6667,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SWE,Sweden,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",24,0.527,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",16,0.8431,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",16,0.8431,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",139,0,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",135,0.1438,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",138,0.1438,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",104,0.3333,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",106,0.3333,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,SYR,Syria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",133,0.0413,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TCD,Chad,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",136,0.019,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",137,0.098,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",141,0.098,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,THA,Thailand,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",65,0.3333,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",64,0.5098,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",64,0.5098,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",128,0.0889,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",123,0.2418,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",121,0.1333,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",125,0.2157,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",127,0.2157,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",63,0.3397,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",72,0.4837,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",72,0.4837,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",29,0.4825,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",74,0.4771,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TUR,Turkey,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",60,0.346,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",76,0.4641,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.4641,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/01/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,TZA,Tanzania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.1746,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",101,0.3529,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",102,0.3529,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,UGA,Uganda,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",125,0.1016,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",117,0.2941,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",120,0.2941,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",60,0.346,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",87,0.4248,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.4248,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,URY,Uruguay,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",31,0.4794,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",52,0.549,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",52,0.549,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,USA,United States,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",2,0.9365,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,USA,United States,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,,,, +2014,USA,United States,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",1,1,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.3048,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",72,0.4837,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",72,0.4837,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",77,0.3048,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",87,0.4248,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",88,0.4248,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,YEM,Yemen,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",132,0.0476,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",131,0.1765,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",134,0.1765,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",75,0.3079,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",79,0.4575,2012,,United Nations;United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People;http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens.html,15/03/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",80,0.4575,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",124,0.1048,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",110,0.3137,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",113,0.3137,2012, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",122,0.127,2010,,United Nations e-Government Survey ,10/01/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",136,0.127,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,GOVONLINESERVIDX,"8.02 Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best)",139,0.127,2010, ,United Nations; E-Government Readiness Knowledge Base; http://www.unpan.org/egovkb,29/11/2012 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),121,2.9999006078,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),137,2.787879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),59,4.0804571079,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),70,4.0348564656,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),78,3.8578302,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),7,5.3739623542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),3,5.6719966491,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),1,5.905632,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),135,2.5929669474,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),139,2.6430303243,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),143,2.5248718086,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),74,3.8377102087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),56,4.1995068239,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),47,4.3511104769,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),23,4.7780418692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),26,4.7325412,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),25,4.722812384,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),48,4.2453224317,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),77,3.9171361722,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),69,3.9377699794,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),14,5.0131262892,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),9,5.3691859005,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),6,5.5436335639,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),138,2.4484687565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),135,2.7242117959,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),127,3.0359731842,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),66,3.9959332111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),69,4.0414009007,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),63,4.1317070254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),91,3.569267175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),110,3.3832447692,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),124,3.1497620702,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),76,3.8177924342,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),86,3.7319539975,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),68,3.9572499265,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),62,4.071611607,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),68,4.0536759839,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),65,4.0701125962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),101,3.4169350195,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),108,3.4258132098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),110,3.4047516388,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),6,5.3871695982,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),8,5.4227344,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),14,5.2143120632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),128,2.829545,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),113,3.33332575,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),86,3.74551,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),139,2.397597,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),123,2.9458015351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),115,3.314685947,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),112,3.3929117014,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),65,4.025379979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),80,3.890874414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),93,3.6785871046,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),45,4.2594316171,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),36,4.4556334339,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),53,4.2862496634,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),37,4.4089902985,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),29,4.689537463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),17,4.9996213795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),33,4.525268,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),54,4.1790492459,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),67,4.0887765814,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),61,4.1433893078,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),53,4.1954397064,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),51,4.2480283124,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),56,4.236257725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),36,4.4281673809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),37,4.4535033609,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),52,4.2873716733,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),30,4.5587840189,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),30,4.5860356353,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),40,4.4306356125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),16,4.9743818161,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),22,4.8171017501,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),24,4.756144881,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),118,3.0037706721,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),94,3.5942936071,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),81,3.7851888751,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),105,3.3202586273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),83,3.8192439172,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),82,3.7800086238,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),49,4.2339409036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),62,4.119096048,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),57,4.2133952408,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),22,4.8224752847,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),24,4.7590553089,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),32,4.550286366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),70,3.884369417,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),78,3.9122588342,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),71,3.9368209098,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),57,4.1242730036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),60,4.1207880185,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),77,3.8817280317,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),106,3.2760583039,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),114,3.3323620184,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),113,3.3346155136,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),47,4.246655016,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),40,4.3998390009,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),34,4.5117371848,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),17,4.9140660397,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),33,4.5443733149,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),48,4.3299212718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),73,3.8607130309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),98,3.5531422552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),104,3.5014323095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),133,2.6573466783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),140,2.5770438417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),122,3.191876251,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),86,3.6026010214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),82,3.842502,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),58,4.1845713421,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),96,3.4840670824,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),122,3.1254094763,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),141,2.5689762812,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),99,3.4580147732,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),84,3.7649137474,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),79,3.82528784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),18,4.9073379333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),23,4.7997497747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),18,4.9519233757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),55,4.1501308667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),59,4.1326700875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),72,3.9204713949,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),20,4.8788028382,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),18,4.9119436043,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),16,5.1207621211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),41,4.3486321511,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),50,4.2617381903,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),59,4.1773039569,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),90,3.690062,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),94,3.6718594879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),29,4.5865081538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),25,4.7513913692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),37,4.4875636136,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),88,3.5800928122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),91,3.668341,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),88,3.7331372888,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),85,3.6650495166,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),71,4.0164592601,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),49,4.3285832604,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),72,4.006661,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),96,3.6547763586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),26,4.6105809138,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),27,4.7068006983,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),23,4.8024248356,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),119,3.0015156381,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),138,2.6594223131,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),138,2.7818523121,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),127,2.8536816625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),129,3.0380176807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),115,3.3077600746,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),63,4.0712532647,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),39,4.410286104,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),46,4.3526773652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),28,4.5998527677,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),32,4.5468251875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),21,4.9000083442,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),104,3.3750426199,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),128,3.0382448596,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),139,2.7169700567,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),114,3.1906405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),111,3.3658157627,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),98,3.5874892182,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),140,2.331786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),142,2.4485233296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),140,2.6797456793,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),95,3.4841693153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),102,3.4729116118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),108,3.4264350304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),56,4.14569075,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),65,4.1000355678,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),42,4.4170078514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),35,4.4549849068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),45,4.3327556811,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),54,4.2823135594,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),64,4.0409606907,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),44,4.3518020955,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),45,4.3547547932,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),83,3.71374238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),81,3.8666850883,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),105,3.4708373382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),33,4.4671587504,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),57,4.1962281879,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),62,4.1392496598,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),39,4.3774479449,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),41,4.3901613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),43,4.3893831757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),112,3.2049366604,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),118,3.2078505911,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),130,2.9778871407,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),77,3.7898590364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),74,3.9387700438,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),89,3.7323324522,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),51,4.2116757603,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),43,4.3646847714,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),30,4.566092,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),42,4.3362583222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),46,4.3188366694,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),28,4.6158824566,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),60,4.077519,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),35,4.4788039244,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),27,4.649736719,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),31,4.532276122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),28,4.7010762074,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),26,4.7119566906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),136,2.4742580152,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),141,2.4733263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),147,2.3639956375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),58,4.1090473274,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),55,4.2024444124,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),85,3.7525816176,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),15,4.9941460889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),13,5.150918,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),15,5.1220528413,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),109,3.2400578179,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),119,3.1822087897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),126,3.0522009027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),35,4.506916,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),141,2.1564699355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),144,2.1008885907,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),148,2.2197867481,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),42,4.388092,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),83,3.7646656973,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),132,2.781803,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),145,2.4918024667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),21,4.873899869,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),14,5.132873,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),19,4.9420029488,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),130,2.797824,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),127,3.0560135363,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),132,2.9019752731,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),71,3.8703295698,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),73,3.9708467221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),70,3.9376232224,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),12,5.167503841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),5,5.4635785188,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),7,5.4886599676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),103,3.4074686783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),103,3.4667022745,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),107,3.4423962103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),52,4.202385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),38,4.4306692403,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),51,4.3053064328,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),108,3.244697362,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),96,3.5878682727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),90,3.7076184068,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),131,2.7522330888,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),134,2.7318529865,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),129,3.0125180779,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),80,3.7390201415,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),76,3.9323054307,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),76,3.8997485749,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),69,3.8848302005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),61,4.119195098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),29,4.5917121608,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),68,3.8970031766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),63,4.1044029909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),64,4.1290358531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),4,5.5817463111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),4,5.6413129273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),4,5.68486558,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),133,2.900952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),24,4.6436034898,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),31,4.5826748532,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),44,4.3881142883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),82,3.7235147364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),93,3.620188445,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),95,3.655306207,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),75,3.8178296989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),92,3.6271920966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),109,3.4086259713,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),126,2.8604823145,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),120,3.175595851,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),136,2.8288848824,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),50,4.2205486881,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),48,4.3084439113,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),31,4.5508134833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),79,3.7646362267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),100,3.510587744,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),101,3.5336656328,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),10,5.3538899015,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),6,5.4412063735,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),9,5.3521975892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),81,3.7239866564,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),97,3.5752801312,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),97,3.6046248137,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),72,3.8694781348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),58,4.1675247318,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),66,4.0205973624,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),137,2.4663523568,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),125,3.0720657324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),111,3.3985177945,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),43,4.3348914694,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),47,4.3095083562,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),41,4.4285885633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),32,4.5010586941,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),19,4.8943393795,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),20,4.9008869993,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),115,3.190231525,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),121,3.1744620769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),131,2.9188142,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),19,4.8827369181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),16,5.0675400481,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),10,5.2891053185,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),11,5.2031914621,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),15,5.1159486622,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),13,5.21631,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),92,3.5445880701,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),117,3.2270465125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),128,3.020420075,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),34,4.4656483418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),20,4.8419284442,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),22,4.8854518601,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),93,3.5387123195,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),112,3.3518085532,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),114,3.3102944802,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),100,3.4424865714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),85,3.7402421467,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),80,3.8104363066,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),116,3.1234829574,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),123,3.1094227639,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),125,3.0777291155,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),84,3.6961943034,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),64,4.1043575224,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),73,3.9195915305,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),13,5.0864434347,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),21,4.8326601124,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),36,4.4940315023,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),132,2.7096308091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),133,2.7418873736,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),135,2.8355771159,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),2,5.717247,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),2,5.8479557758,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),2,5.9050524978,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),117,3.0461533175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),106,3.4470575531,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),103,3.5019749373,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),94,3.5291787065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),116,3.2847301834,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),102,3.5031290831,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),3,5.6875550534,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),10,5.356038,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),5,5.6076995405,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),5,5.529584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),7,5.4359032615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),8,5.3801703842,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),38,4.3950583309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),79,3.8987850989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),91,3.7040502385,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),1,5.8838922358,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),1,5.8917947939,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),3,5.8770024104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),89,3.705049,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),75,3.90017195,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),124,2.9334429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),126,3.0582972629,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),119,3.2275075564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),120,3.0005482522,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),124,3.105587575,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),120,3.2272032668,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),125,2.865078,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),137,2.6604073408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),134,2.8486108391,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),107,3.2648566929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),101,3.505620263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),117,3.2700210703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),102,3.410565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),99,3.5335151431,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),106,3.4703052788,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),9,5.3649458304,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),12,5.2440374018,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),11,5.2668901443,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),134,2.6538531737,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),131,2.8083546615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),118,3.2385670386,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),17,5.025742,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),38,4.4656543048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),97,3.4793094592,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),113,3.1908790206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),95,3.5932462601,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),121,3.2045056029,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),89,3.5784345544,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),104,3.4656922385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),99,3.5850967342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),67,3.9726586211,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),49,4.2828303854,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),110,3.2313750852,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),107,3.4408679985,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),123,3.1907092,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),87,3.5958658048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),87,3.7155216127,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),87,3.7389267488,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),25,4.6192142925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),74,3.9164048305,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),78,3.7677390006,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),53,4.2370841994,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),55,4.2411600525,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),8,5.3686917038,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),11,5.3484141449,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),12,5.2453514284,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),90,3.572604118,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),88,3.7054263361,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),92,3.6836949304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),46,4.2491730176,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),52,4.2398999728,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),67,4.0040036525,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),122,2.95406585,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),130,2.8568919765,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),142,2.554318459,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),40,4.3713899416,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),75,3.9342366724,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),84,3.7600856977,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),27,4.6057652683,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),34,4.4917700266,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),39,4.453026201,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),129,2.8067721494,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),136,2.6608238893,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),144,2.5213257065,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),44,4.27074462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),66,4.09880365,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),60,4.1519909024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),142,1.981094,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),143,2.2456325524,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),146,2.412811824,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),98,3.4682789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),105,3.4478003706,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),116,3.2956837641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),61,4.0723610514,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),54,4.2162187033,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),50,4.3058734559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),111,3.2190268667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),109,3.4231204333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ079,8.01 Importance of ICTs to government vision of the future (1-7),100,3.5707183967,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),112,3.2732066661,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),131,3.0664813333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),64,3.9006436285,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),95,3.7918282328,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),93,3.7545750667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),32,4.5874448558,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),2,5.9851195497,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),2,6.062998,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),119,3.1150504912,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),117,3.3460224414,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),121,3.2644586882,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),95,3.4700055391,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),78,3.942450608,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),76,3.9828158632,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),8,5.2582194205,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),19,5.2503157333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),21,5.1675385707,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),39,4.4332361429,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),35,4.6476457241,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),36,4.6479176554,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),38,4.4369181213,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),34,4.7093583002,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),34,4.7707182907,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),139,2.2792146986,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),142,2.4664425986,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),144,2.6414406561,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),34,4.56044045,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),41,4.4791296336,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),42,4.473415728,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),104,3.370263825,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),135,2.8961932564,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),137,2.9003800429,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),98,3.4345218072,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),92,3.7988513325,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),101,3.6504256469,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),56,4.056592035,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),68,4.0343976613,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),73,4.0028682246,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),87,3.6011114472,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),98,3.7398224033,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),97,3.705808208,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),4,5.5906449047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),4,5.7758351333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),5,5.6186271132,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),123,3.0142083333,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),111,3.5501749167,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),99,3.6875696667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),137,2.4854993333,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),120,3.0480005415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),115,3.4484333157,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),115,3.4724774986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),59,3.9671689957,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),48,4.377440138,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),54,4.2707665261,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),61,3.9428555746,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),64,4.1337848113,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),72,4.0127299154,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),50,4.1226793421,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),33,4.7496124877,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),30,4.8640746427,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),70,4.0376006667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),72,3.7248957523,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),91,3.8032858605,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),86,3.8163284643,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),9,5.242491411,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),22,5.1416304375,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),25,5.0462887674,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),35,4.5516502206,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),31,4.856866787,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),35,4.7419580189,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),26,4.6922769057,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),29,4.8954085451,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),32,4.8270342875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),33,4.5805233388,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),38,4.5794315834,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),38,4.5769336111,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),97,3.4433248806,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),112,3.543202869,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),107,3.5777786528,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),118,3.1231980602,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),101,3.7072063057,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),102,3.6387551347,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),28,4.653283581,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),32,4.765220016,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),31,4.8590224986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),45,4.2931567654,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),45,4.413660103,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),50,4.3065455589,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),74,3.7167263475,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),61,4.1668799447,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),64,4.1190340304,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),62,3.9417966127,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),65,4.1271633395,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),66,4.071316004,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),77,3.6877155558,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),93,3.7939570061,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),96,3.7247401149,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),30,4.6111125853,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),26,5.0057323336,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),27,4.9668687425,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),12,5.1450601191,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),24,5.0463454383,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),26,5.0140374062,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),65,3.8842130577,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),72,3.9949540851,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),81,3.949321481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),135,2.6391696522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),139,2.6500646139,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),134,2.9715704507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),96,3.45296,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),94,3.793751,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),62,4.1323017807,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),51,4.0976939186,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),80,3.9192214921,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),113,3.4924622747,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),40,4.42786895,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),42,4.4581695825,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),44,4.43669934,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),16,4.8871963472,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),17,5.3642079249,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),12,5.4516184947,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),85,3.6213025278,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),83,3.9060983625,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),83,3.8985930861,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),17,4.8813463637,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),10,5.5471748681,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),8,5.5726330281,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),18,4.8557299193,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),25,5.0181183968,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),28,4.9626964013,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),120,3.2965843333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),122,3.2566097713,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),7,5.2671304359,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),9,5.5523234564,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),17,5.3531859848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),90,3.526387639,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),63,4.1380705,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),55,4.2442794296,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),109,3.3150874503,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),89,3.8115427534,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),85,3.8762101472,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),133,3.0211916667,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),139,2.8398599149,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),68,3.8500314044,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),53,4.2822508994,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),56,4.2437177746,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),102,3.3918857193,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),118,3.342601771,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),117,3.4495939753,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),121,3.0172945625,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),114,3.5088962269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),109,3.5676648108,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),80,3.6586562392,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),85,3.868817368,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),87,3.8060729875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),15,5.0310386613,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),30,4.8665890938,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),24,5.0663560047,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),107,3.3333742158,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),127,3.1687316199,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),133,2.9770962128,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),82,3.6366406833,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),73,3.9947699209,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),65,4.078406572,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),141,2.1144693333,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),144,2.3644817765,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),147,2.4627885442,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),60,3.9546006028,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),69,4.0307515373,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),69,4.0426499442,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),75,3.6991464,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),58,4.2037011893,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),49,4.3142569943,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),46,4.2633987876,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),40,4.547873227,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),41,4.4796874483,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),47,4.2575823608,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),43,4.4445203652,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),45,4.4303372063,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),92,3.5054798305,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),71,3.9955150294,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),91,3.7635185425,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),42,4.3534510355,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),50,4.322475396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),53,4.2763119784,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),24,4.7387271357,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),20,5.2296987667,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),19,5.1910343505,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),113,3.2386875396,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),108,3.6226488637,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),112,3.4936651149,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),78,3.6773775941,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),97,3.7562813479,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),104,3.6200857738,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),37,4.4847655667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),56,4.2168195905,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),52,4.2839553333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),21,4.8316056622,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),27,4.9801948898,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),22,5.1507721609,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),41,4.3917196667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),23,5.1333319748,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),23,5.1215146587,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),67,3.8668593813,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),44,4.4283450691,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),46,4.4100124453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),126,2.9862932918,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),130,3.0843314333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),132,2.9993389675,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),88,3.5748445255,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),103,3.6884808041,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),114,3.4818465392,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),1,5.8967272222,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),3,5.8860056667,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),3,5.8543406209,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),84,3.6263175808,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),105,3.6295415966,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),105,3.602383418,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),89,3.795452,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),138,2.4663202798,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),134,2.8968935302,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),136,2.9275579351,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),109,3.5902653333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),124,3.2446536063,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),143,2.442187,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),148,2.1275434444,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),43,4.3186180667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),57,4.2037365,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),43,4.4374973163,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),129,2.9349815875,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),128,3.1218581788,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),135,2.9320680468,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),49,4.1344035228,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),36,4.604692574,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),37,4.6009657762,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),20,4.8345926072,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),13,5.4070641729,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),10,5.4793600402,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),76,3.6968835652,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),75,3.9877904248,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),78,3.9730335521,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),70,3.7450833333,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),81,3.9153564134,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),92,3.7611391322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),94,3.4760943141,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),76,3.9676930909,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),75,3.9923524758,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),130,2.7752190026,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),131,3.0539773288,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),126,3.2232687379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),66,3.8679714348,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),39,4.5545014769,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),40,4.4956638207,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),63,3.9040645105,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),54,4.2659760327,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),47,4.4071552357,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),83,3.6314460676,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),77,3.955163997,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),82,3.9122726514,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),11,5.1616751704,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),16,5.3671956424,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),13,5.4043461433,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),143,2.6476766667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),53,4.0895817735,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),47,4.3935159511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),51,4.2984169827,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),44,4.3166649909,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),66,4.0556461483,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),71,4.0181081678,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),91,3.5104045222,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),106,3.6242350322,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),110,3.5463145453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),136,2.6286079725,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),137,2.787551617,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),146,2.5263695784,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),52,4.0964435764,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),49,4.3357493038,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),48,4.3357484639,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),124,3.0069422867,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),122,3.2749199147,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),125,3.2310700356,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),6,5.3513027628,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),7,5.5703961245,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),9,5.5519297901,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),108,3.3310192718,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),116,3.4347067104,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),116,3.4668036501,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),116,3.1342105124,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),113,3.5188455773,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),111,3.5400791346,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),132,2.6972831833,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),125,3.2143862441,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),123,3.2522253632,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),19,4.8434645586,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),15,5.3864104521,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),14,5.4009474379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),13,5.0806921664,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),14,5.3936941265,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),15,5.3597422706,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),128,2.94869208,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),124,3.2146540256,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),130,3.0736523,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),14,5.0415282362,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),18,5.2891523494,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),18,5.3381002442,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),29,4.653282378,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),21,5.1447252207,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),20,5.178179,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),103,3.390523837,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),110,3.5600381708,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),118,3.4312935014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),55,4.0676929858,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),37,4.6014028147,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),39,4.563734924,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),73,3.7206101828,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),90,3.8087311844,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),94,3.7524822551,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),79,3.6600823029,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),67,4.0359263822,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),67,4.0608759539,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),99,3.4344688838,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),107,3.6229009213,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),108,3.5706104979,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),54,4.0735861845,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),46,4.4015307612,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),63,4.1236970453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),23,4.7534712685,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),28,4.9343943708,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),33,4.8092847744,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),131,2.7223929651,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),123,3.2737991245,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),120,3.3270497845,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),22,4.78128,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),5,5.7546349253,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),4,5.7684560322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),105,3.3626441863,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),96,3.7615785177,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),90,3.7671524617,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),71,3.7320816391,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),74,3.9931667278,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),61,4.1339635212,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),31,4.6092649064,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),59,4.197719,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),29,4.9587231802,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),25,4.701867,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),6,5.7301564205,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),6,5.6181222808,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),57,3.9774849213,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),82,3.912400033,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),88,3.8021058688,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),2,5.7754155715,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),1,6.2859302646,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),1,6.2638931372,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),119,3.328782,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),119,3.3478736,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),110,3.2839390714,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),88,3.825484421,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),74,4.0023810043,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),115,3.1994608079,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),104,3.643091525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),100,3.6872643379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),133,2.664548,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),138,2.7769621136,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),141,2.7770691579,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),100,3.4191064738,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),100,3.7091540877,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),106,3.5966085729,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),69,3.8106106667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),52,4.2965297144,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),57,4.1991387984,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),10,5.2108258609,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),8,5.5628868006,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),7,5.5981727085,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),140,2.2128723053,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),140,2.5751152205,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),140,2.8397523667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),51,4.310684,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),68,4.0560659386,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),127,2.9829053245,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),134,2.6617770842,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),136,2.8915900867,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),142,2.7018466778,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),86,3.6059798348,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),86,3.8354707462,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),84,3.8764636814,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),106,3.3383110874,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),87,3.8269321285,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),122,3.0155488656,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),129,3.1077676662,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),138,2.8876453213,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),81,3.6482220476,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),70,4.0131458709,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),80,3.9600899151,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),27,4.6679041539,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),77,3.9762025661,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),58,3.975873288,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),60,4.1776743998,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),60,4.1431541888,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),3,5.7029516297,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),12,5.4890415725,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),16,5.356506344,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),114,3.2068690648,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),99,3.7323257787,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),98,3.6891815311,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),93,3.5021026689,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),84,3.8955399909,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),95,3.7490688831,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),111,3.2794408667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),121,3.2833329922,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),129,3.1154008138,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),36,4.4886977435,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),55,4.2215368908,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),59,4.1584636734,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),5,5.5241288976,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),11,5.4900903422,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),11,5.4706070369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),117,3.1329378827,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),126,3.2139902964,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),127,3.1847519344,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),48,4.14102392,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),62,4.16142255,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),58,4.1869860667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),142,2.0661356667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),141,2.5606635175,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),145,2.5746168533,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),89,3.5544709167,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),102,3.7023704569,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),103,3.6231183507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),101,3.3944430048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),79,3.9239819011,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),79,3.9699187829,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),125,2.9915482667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),132,3.0509518111,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.08,Pillar 8. Government usage (1-7),128,3.1367351058,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),137,2.2585677743,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),138,2.3808361667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),72,3.4358468423,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),89,3.2617620237,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),108,2.9488484207,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),33,4.4213808689,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),19,4.9441667304,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),18,5.0124935644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),96,3.0725980096,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),94,3.1434685522,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),96,3.176115155,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),99,3.0472555758,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),83,3.3137126122,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),67,3.5306556383,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),16,5.1601400734,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),18,5.0112634169,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),20,4.953109345,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),20,5.0212298803,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),24,4.7607143666,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),24,4.6708109615,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),70,3.484890077,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),59,3.6472947294,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),46,3.8491386806,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),141,2.068882421,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),144,2.0619002177,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),146,2.094286205,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),22,4.8644822825,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),28,4.5065678601,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),29,4.4984750893,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),106,2.9686744286,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),113,2.8796777506,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),132,2.5794952357,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),122,2.7355509973,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),125,2.7189676469,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),118,2.8442936631,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),124,2.7156207449,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),126,2.7079106507,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),127,2.7079232697,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),60,3.5890443532,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),87,3.2959760142,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),86,3.2746018235,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),30,4.4429096074,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),32,4.3856685109,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),35,4.2648201318,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),105,2.9686940833,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),96,3.1191738076,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),87,3.2678448665,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),123,2.7234672303,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),116,2.8470990478,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),114,2.8781287512,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),104,3.0115394927,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),53,3.6962110624,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),50,3.7417607491,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),57,3.6371511082,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),36,4.2578630868,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),38,4.1348241973,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),58,3.6195168238,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),50,3.7305131327,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),39,4.0695261682,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),38,4.1514899973,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),97,3.1696297989,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),98,3.0560360784,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),105,2.9716813357,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),110,2.9013597327,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),14,5.2322717872,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),16,5.136555031,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),17,5.0997370792,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),9,5.4180795199,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),9,5.4415259542,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),11,5.2989309456,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),37,4.2063554361,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),34,4.347246483,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),37,4.2278092003,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),41,3.9619435903,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),55,3.686940102,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),56,3.6660449779,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),118,2.8096849903,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),120,2.7683983528,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),119,2.8357778989,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),117,2.8414372367,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),119,2.7771054414,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),116,2.8477403618,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),48,3.7553603324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),47,3.8309943944,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),49,3.7934578637,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),68,3.4980412792,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),65,3.5303843253,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),73,3.4517619292,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),58,3.6634708523,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),49,3.746029873,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),50,3.754585769,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),38,4.1079899297,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),51,3.7326500112,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),52,3.7322450933,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),43,3.9092738102,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),43,3.9711015946,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),45,3.8729151659,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),18,5.0996744129,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),14,5.2178631484,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),14,5.1953549803,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),6,5.5307046225,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),13,5.2526967007,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),19,4.9925491601,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),80,3.3304203589,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),66,3.5281940379,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),64,3.5506331544,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),140,2.2370499384,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),142,2.1147047219,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),137,2.3906506804,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),95,3.1157349134,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),90,3.2459701552,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),80,3.3808531823,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),74,3.4263363816,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),62,3.6034960255,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),61,3.6094348585,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),31,4.4378555199,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),36,4.2195371105,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),34,4.3021046894,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),15,5.2097446079,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),15,5.1895530961,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),13,5.2330208686,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),125,2.6635854868,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),110,2.9036479113,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),112,2.8830645192,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),7,5.5049559302,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),3,5.8602812349,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),2,5.9073578568,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),19,5.0273575132,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),20,4.8565051372,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),23,4.7250589688,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),132,2.4242728333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),136,2.4937325664,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),11,5.3492540025,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),8,5.4754697031,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),9,5.3641158651,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),87,3.2615154511,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),76,3.3873308369,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),74,3.4373137311,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),100,3.0187133969,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),100,3.0765806247,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),101,3.1233163321,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),136,2.3272560417,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),145,2.1530919728,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),78,3.37185132,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),73,3.441510502,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),79,3.3865210933,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),77,3.3983508762,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),82,3.3148862474,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),90,3.2374343814,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),67,3.5231507365,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),84,3.3130264529,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),99,3.1583481625,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),101,2.9963824443,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),103,3.0191630142,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),102,3.1157760095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),10,5.3733264067,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),12,5.2844640331,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),10,5.3237089409,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),97,3.0672991071,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),108,2.9371608696,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),120,2.8001042556,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),51,3.7120478938,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),63,3.5879999632,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),54,3.6921470899,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),138,2.249732125,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),141,2.1997524295,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),142,2.3034424662,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),45,3.8730212494,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),42,4.0033182041,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),42,3.9693136722,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),86,3.2821127272,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),86,3.2962542899,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),72,3.4551996445,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),52,3.7004711548,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),56,3.6713372014,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),60,3.6109711708,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),26,4.5820541159,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),33,4.3646065239,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),31,4.4300090774,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),113,2.9333695658,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),99,3.0889568153,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),107,2.9703427524,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),23,4.6744826681,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),25,4.6485248077,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),25,4.6136067369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),12,5.2902289384,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),7,5.5387214269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),6,5.5187414059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),54,3.6793219382,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),60,3.6292670544,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),82,3.3688425812,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),82,3.3189620244,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),91,3.2321439832,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),94,3.1847168444,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),57,3.6641921753,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),54,3.6995490706,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),48,3.8098617401,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),17,5.1332652741,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),17,5.1180375588,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),16,5.1246898111,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),49,3.7310524895,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),37,4.1829016547,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),36,4.2628488973,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),59,3.5905458904,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),71,3.4692920593,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),71,3.4623616351,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),114,2.9141880694,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),123,2.74933212,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),126,2.7119794252,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),110,2.9392368263,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),107,2.9405616464,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),111,2.8968662527,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),4,5.760983912,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),5,5.7120105828,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),5,5.6668031524,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),93,3.167908361,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),101,3.0376867787,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),103,3.0408920868,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),88,3.2674855833,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),104,2.9869342807,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),116,2.8558097165,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),114,2.8656283018,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),109,2.9135184583,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),133,2.5715068796,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),138,2.3218299053,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),148,2.0288601361,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),69,3.493691571,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),70,3.4715577872,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),69,3.4734068778,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),136,2.2748394983,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),140,2.2122240121,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),141,2.3055016236,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),27,4.5183404477,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),30,4.4853593643,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),27,4.5319378583,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),28,4.5002924732,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),21,4.8115603049,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),15,5.1661961489,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),46,3.8286245456,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),45,3.8709637161,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),43,3.9400304971,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),109,2.9435480693,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),111,2.8897894911,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),121,2.7870680173,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),89,3.2130078294,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),74,3.425367456,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),68,3.5240130593,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),129,2.4723853001,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),135,2.3752459322,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),134,2.5158430687,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),65,3.5554727181,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),52,3.7237383056,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),59,3.6163483089,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),71,3.4520751149,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),78,3.3645693322,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),55,3.6842908741,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),92,3.1771583023,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),93,3.1711126462,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),95,3.1776660033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),25,4.6145741053,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),29,4.5039226707,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),30,4.4875605928,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),140,2.3334716667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),47,3.8049672437,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),44,3.8715313541,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),47,3.8108824397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),62,3.5648159246,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),58,3.6541086002,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),63,3.5701817417,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),108,2.9543139151,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),117,2.8181752707,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),123,2.7321371498,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),134,2.400369352,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),134,2.3895389957,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),144,2.2288407194,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),83,3.2931345722,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),80,3.3344342004,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),70,3.4697967333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),112,2.9350576914,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),124,2.727933708,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),125,2.7168370507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),24,4.6445047785,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),27,4.5175788399,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),28,4.5060246732,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),119,2.8071804396,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),122,2.7498116343,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),117,2.8455085332,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),88,3.2458996121,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),79,3.3431340103,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),91,3.2266597298,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),120,2.7792741391,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),118,2.7978740109,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),113,2.8695256293,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),5,5.6439100473,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),2,6.0032818883,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),3,5.8455898633,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),13,5.2834695835,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),11,5.3178019292,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),12,5.2871040094,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),128,2.5430587879,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),129,2.5442421057,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),135,2.5114701142,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),21,4.9752368605,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),22,4.8101590949,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),22,4.8069771907,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),42,3.9221579446,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),41,4.0422965159,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),40,4.0705432964,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),94,3.1197964943,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),106,2.9698178735,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),105,2.992508404,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),61,3.5768835167,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),48,3.8004496147,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),41,3.9865423085,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),76,3.4136896724,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),72,3.4497394691,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),81,3.3747347636,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),84,3.2890221043,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),68,3.495618214,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),62,3.5721314782,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),66,3.5310580882,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),77,3.3830109179,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),78,3.3904883544,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),29,4.4494886077,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),26,4.5572678492,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),26,4.5600432032,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),35,4.303293648,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),35,4.3211139752,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),33,4.3612742565,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),126,2.6198100804,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),121,2.7540527497,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),115,2.8621049933,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),32,4.429669608,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),23,4.8015200539,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),21,4.8384327665,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),90,3.2112353476,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),97,3.1163460615,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),100,3.1298189401,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),73,3.4323663556,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),53,3.7223664358,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),44,3.9129913008,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),56,3.6683692308,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),61,3.615137625,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),51,3.7538458829,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),40,4.0069024917,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),31,4.4257765998,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),32,4.3951796191,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),64,3.5584321982,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),67,3.5092344922,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),85,3.2923333369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),1,6.025081324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),1,6.1300339168,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),1,5.9343770868,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),133,2.4165840417,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),130,2.6192628688,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),102,2.9948248743,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),85,3.3031885432,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),84,3.3066861073,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),111,2.9361858691,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),98,3.0932087831,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),93,3.1888400484,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),131,2.4425359522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),130,2.534557336,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),129,2.6196931754,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),63,3.5636957457,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),57,3.6687960242,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),66,3.5367733068,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),34,4.3212039697,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),40,4.047226232,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),39,4.0708045767,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),2,5.8954552771,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),4,5.7747721894,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),4,5.8247150076,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),139,2.2427032044,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),137,2.3260416206,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),124,2.7286753728,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),69,3.4875795417,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),77,3.3922460313,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),132,2.4341396143,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),135,2.3742815802,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),139,2.2959368283,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),147,2.0818370152,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),85,3.2837312526,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),88,3.2817135204,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),83,3.3535141593,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),103,2.9934436436,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),102,3.0282381103,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),133,2.428172347,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),131,2.4989341063,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),139,2.342356181,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),91,3.2006694994,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),95,3.1204105174,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),92,3.2143030677,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),44,3.8955679968,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),76,3.3928646752,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),55,3.6746009243,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),64,3.537971182,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),65,3.5497312462,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),3,5.7836245244,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),6,5.65470618,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),7,5.4337599215,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),127,2.5711817413,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),127,2.6141780526,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),128,2.6834803935,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),115,2.8563695514,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),115,2.8575137932,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),122,2.7865786185,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),75,3.4176116409,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),81,3.315355533,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),98,3.1612625512,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),39,4.0763200538,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),46,3.8316069174,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),53,3.730707738,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),8,5.4243826195,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),10,5.4319499362,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),8,5.3909227142,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),107,2.9662167389,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),104,3.0141486277,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),109,2.935831731,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),79,3.3336181347,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),75,3.3887316446,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),75,3.4138815007,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),142,1.92661869,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),143,2.0837249638,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),143,2.2397590453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),81,3.3225179231,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),92,3.2275430959,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),89,3.2510947375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),121,2.7672283177,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),112,2.8893376921,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),106,2.9871784058,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),130,2.4430052956,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),128,2.550407618,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.D,D. Impact subindex (1-7),131,2.6149209608,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),89,3.6628700703,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),124,3.294118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),32,4.4632761915,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),36,4.3619987156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),36,4.38994975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),25,4.6592403131,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),17,4.8623564426,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),13,4.960726,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),76,3.8647872632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),78,3.8465129189,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),100,3.6889202579,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),105,3.4916330286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),98,3.6380153644,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),114,3.5629451795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),17,4.8738882769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),28,4.6110981143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),30,4.510021792,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),14,4.982600854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),12,5.0316396053,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),16,4.9474043882,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),67,4.0026327133,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),56,4.0784439476,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),80,3.91826615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),139,2.6222842696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),143,2.4242155976,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),147,2.5776105366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),13,4.9848354889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),20,4.8300558556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),19,4.8939577834,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),110,3.4411842714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),133,3.0526436,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),136,3.1206021361,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),138,2.7433430418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),137,2.9445482074,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),142,2.8868001939,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),121,3.2689578006,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),136,3.0197708677,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),137,3.1116073554,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),128,3.0938688012,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),118,3.2529081024,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),127,3.2360216567,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),11,5.0269959901,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),25,4.6409765862,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),41,4.3364355991,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),137,2.746827,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),109,3.511767,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),58,4.137627,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),123,3.248048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),113,3.4124659493,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),103,3.6020138887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),112,3.570679211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),33,4.4348913977,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),33,4.3988614689,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),44,4.3043652896,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),36,4.4046754934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),30,4.5774431009,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),32,4.506872639,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),59,4.0719207426,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),52,4.1206388333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),26,4.5774013795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),119,3.410089,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),44,4.2603576349,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),68,3.9493172454,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),87,3.8318045665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),18,4.8667737181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),23,4.701565198,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),34,4.4519148161,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),1,5.6177603455,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),1,5.6431550331,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),1,5.57499681,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),37,4.3908399736,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),38,4.3280818961,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),46,4.2851532375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),45,4.2448803959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),45,4.2055863414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),48,4.2556252381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),51,4.1496710148,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),44,4.2298755393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),40,4.3376017827,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),95,3.6031710643,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),83,3.7994337138,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),78,3.9271850462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),84,3.7347565804,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),99,3.6373412849,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),93,3.7383923939,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),116,3.321180018,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),120,3.239218312,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),118,3.4203206383,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),29,4.5943848085,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),29,4.5973703912,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),23,4.6979505539,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),69,3.9961631211,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),85,3.7907280747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),67,4.0350744901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),39,4.3320712571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),48,4.1570428972,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),68,4.0343686549,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),16,4.890247854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),13,5.0295912396,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),10,5.1198736751,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),3,5.4577122059,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),10,5.1230737752,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),14,4.9526561382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),99,3.5643477227,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),76,3.8721008,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),76,3.9597186476,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),126,3.1460921826,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),142,2.5709801417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),139,3.0437342816,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),93,3.6282081153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),90,3.727626,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),61,4.0670028079,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),131,3.0234845064,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),129,3.0640558299,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),138,3.0805888579,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),90,3.6626266036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),105,3.5763866232,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),97,3.72274064,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),46,4.2192594333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),46,4.1875969725,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),37,4.3811495633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),134,2.9059612125,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),130,3.057318725,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),123,3.2998163139,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),8,5.2536752368,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),2,5.3933197217,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),2,5.5206806263,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),35,4.4125028278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),41,4.2780567996,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),42,4.3321916,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),93,3.676826,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),113,3.5658538879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),15,4.9005265385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),14,4.9658543077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),22,4.7291008409,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),106,3.4894994383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),101,3.62854,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),107,3.6187170811,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),81,3.8226276101,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),96,3.6596840442,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),79,3.9263975168,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),114,3.346426,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),129,3.2085924517,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),31,4.5250526331,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),22,4.7036272478,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),29,4.5406424761,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),114,3.3888519358,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),115,3.3456128036,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),116,3.4745026195,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),47,4.1933267313,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),40,4.3139169143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),28,4.5491768556,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),60,4.0515838,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),61,4.0193457017,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),64,4.0574236519,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),26,4.6562110581,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),24,4.645118825,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),21,4.737711314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),70,3.9921674541,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),63,4.0016138205,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),77,3.9463352057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),125,3.16935815,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),124,3.1648700912,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),121,3.3209242193,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),142,2.324518,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),144,2.3174000263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),144,2.8363568652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),111,3.417763858,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),110,3.4523531529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),108,3.6176142832,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),52,4.14707615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),39,4.3197042598,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),25,4.5967411371,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),63,4.0245063906,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),54,4.1108023243,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),53,4.1626009159,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),22,4.7298255196,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),16,4.9065634505,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),20,4.8111082906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),133,2.9439637378,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),134,3.0281968388,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),141,3.0077258133,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),21,4.7704871971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),21,4.7497727914,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),24,4.6550733326,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),20,4.798441263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),27,4.6356457327,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),49,4.2414313649,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),120,3.2737433835,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),123,3.1779979218,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),130,3.2063305552,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),48,4.1827043636,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),58,4.0582161406,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),62,4.061664611,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),103,3.5264975349,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),88,3.762616981,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),83,3.876014,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),6,5.3205011975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),5,5.2758894028,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),4,5.3475990965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),96,3.590744,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),72,3.9288251156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),56,4.14559205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),62,4.027301,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),70,3.9423575111,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),54,4.1525648038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),130,3.054603282,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),128,3.0665921,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),131,3.1980695125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),97,3.5825951832,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),74,3.8864343107,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),66,4.0359173676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),41,4.2783323667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),42,4.2604354667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),51,4.2120578514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),102,3.5274338368,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),92,3.6938026885,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),94,3.7347794811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),55,4.151977,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),98,3.5679455093,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),102,3.6217717488,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),99,3.6894005636,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),64,3.995685,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),101,3.6726856297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),140,2.863704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),143,2.8546133333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),49,4.1650219586,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),80,3.817464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),52,4.173048922,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),88,3.6710140179,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),117,3.2866176935,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),110,3.5962877108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),65,4.0128852302,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),66,3.9769458858,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),59,4.129348402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),7,5.2550675783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),4,5.2955440688,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),3,5.3845570559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),64,4.0152375217,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),53,4.1118964599,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),47,4.2739731026,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),74,3.870518,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),75,3.8801203493,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),96,3.7233600656,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),118,3.2777279803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),122,3.2129185091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),126,3.2367351812,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),115,3.3235927669,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),113,3.3539183124,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),102,3.6681401751,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),80,3.8249833558,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),67,3.9659762456,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),72,3.9997416585,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),124,3.2078331387,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),126,3.1028908049,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),104,3.6577984275,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),122,3.2599469135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),131,3.0564559961,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),135,3.1257736286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),57,4.1067114444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),50,4.1271053818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),35,4.4171132,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),146,2.638387,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),66,4.0058577752,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),51,4.124144461,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),63,4.0602901688,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),68,3.9996339273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),60,4.0245537834,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),73,3.9968352316,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),119,3.2756355989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),119,3.2469781931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),120,3.3485026169,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),141,2.3572989863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),141,2.6878398353,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),148,2.5051115882,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),40,4.3317776673,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),37,4.3492816382,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),38,4.3692869958,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),71,3.9187791267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),94,3.666029248,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),84,3.8545665733,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),9,5.1792116355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),7,5.1959453211,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),11,5.0538783378,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),50,4.1521599744,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),55,4.0812933828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),69,4.0178882174,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),58,4.0767966831,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),57,4.0586442916,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),45,4.2967303371,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),104,3.4988215659,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),97,3.6467520676,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),85,3.8469596363,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),10,5.0663660935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),8,5.1832945911,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),9,5.1449375018,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),5,5.3580931227,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),9,5.1593853902,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),8,5.2009350168,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),136,2.87157385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),132,3.0561705385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),133,3.17515275,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),23,4.7233165564,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),18,4.8353829104,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),15,4.9521238924,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),42,4.2763939771,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),34,4.3698604338,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),33,4.478333,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),109,3.4617098736,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),112,3.4453212708,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),128,3.2294027125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),43,4.2647614908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),43,4.2462893056,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),43,4.3258281745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),75,3.8680959368,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),84,3.798533262,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),90,3.7777622377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),34,4.4242440057,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),32,4.5525473267,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),27,4.5534471683,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),55,4.1299130857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),59,4.0293262257,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),75,3.9881079763,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),19,4.8469304081,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),19,4.8306313657,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),18,4.9232584438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),72,3.9181661757,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),73,3.9116075386,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),70,4.0071539372,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),101,3.5413960365,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),107,3.5439240575,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),109,3.607733087,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),24,4.701253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),11,5.0361319561,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),5,5.2678711297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),79,3.8305893423,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),111,3.4490032677,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),134,3.143813598,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),82,3.7832043225,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),89,3.7440418491,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),88,3.809839339,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),54,4.130489989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),69,3.949223,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),71,4.0030210826,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),28,4.619844,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),35,4.3676643077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),57,4.1377356184,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),112,3.4176649859,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),135,3.0248075761,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),125,3.278043225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),4,5.3966569781,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),3,5.327948097,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),6,5.2301163878,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),125,3.1418,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),117,3.45050565,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),77,3.8603381786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),81,3.8117228371,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),81,3.9146611538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),132,2.9460189068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),138,2.9158404,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),140,3.0145557201,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),61,4.040628,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),47,4.1600941465,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),74,3.9923976931,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),87,3.7031628071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),95,3.6643197685,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),91,3.7769025077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),83,3.78021,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),91,3.7033127573,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),105,3.6448148346,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),2,5.4632424043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),6,5.206231211,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),7,5.227746268,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),92,3.6385528105,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),87,3.7629520352,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),86,3.8429844072,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),62,4.01625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),39,4.3531969079,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),140,2.6141908204,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),129,3.0710002996,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),139,2.8654063711,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),145,2.7534397449,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),56,4.1204796009,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),49,4.1517866654,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),50,4.2408177863,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),108,3.4745037899,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),79,3.8315381551,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),127,3.1195889803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),127,3.0787114848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),132,3.1816835841,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),53,4.1324218286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),71,3.9359017468,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),60,4.1087697933,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),38,4.3551893562,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),111,3.5795795485,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),86,3.7280345271,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),65,3.9880840189,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),65,4.048564362,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),30,4.5768111135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),31,4.5601594783,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),31,4.5077313574,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),91,3.6442144438,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),77,3.8490294168,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),95,3.7265265482,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),100,3.5591902879,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),100,3.6369659543,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),115,3.5424117639,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),117,3.287521,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),106,3.5632719211,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),103,3.6648189212,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),73,3.8759304484,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),86,3.7848699387,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),92,3.7617220798,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),12,5.0097893369,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),15,4.9527145726,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),12,4.9647073417,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),94,3.6236693494,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),104,3.5941308964,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),106,3.6406780484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),107,3.47964508,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),116,3.30838425,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),98,3.7110931805,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),135,2.890501,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),121,3.2377994762,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),122,3.308957496,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),27,4.65368045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),26,4.6405079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),17,4.9410915674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),85,3.7336531371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),108,3.5429255077,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),89,3.7930718838,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),78,3.8589824667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),82,3.8033549667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ139,7.06 Extent of staff training (1-7),82,3.8782493934,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),139,3,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),131,3.363962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),21,5.49928,3.963511,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),20,5.49928,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),65,4.631782,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),68,4.5543628633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),82,4.359824,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),78,4.4216263487,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),9,5.7839,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),12,5.7806396,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),16,5.639647,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),17,5.5783723794,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),77,4.43237,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),51,4.8627079972,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),137,2.734897,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),147,2.6130196911,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),37,5.116423,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),34,5.1461519586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),84,4.328743,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),112,3.7154174398,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),118,3.560976,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),129,3.4080739163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),117,3.579346,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),124,3.4810272726,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),64,4.641543,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),64,4.6614873582,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),97,3.969231,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),87,4.218775516,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),88,4.208062,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),88,4.208062,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),100,3.952115,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),108,3.8642444466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),28,5.32072,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),30,5.2396548577,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),60,4.707881,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),79,4.3835745024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),61,4.690402,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),75,4.4682916051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),141,2.981604,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),108,3.777464,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),122,3.5049097677,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),17,5.62516,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),21,5.4938075335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),12,5.765322,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),13,5.7729560833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),31,5.213528,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),35,5.1440319125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),47,4.868372,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),41,5.0532306667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),120,3.538907,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),118,3.5781075665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),101,3.938407,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),104,3.9747285748,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),45,4.898826,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),56,4.7874991163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),107,3.817073,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),110,3.7721726489,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),38,5.11397,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),47,4.9195258186,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),48,4.840321,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),53,4.8510806331,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),8,5.875309,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),9,5.8240520981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),14,5.705546,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),14,5.7599859562,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),20,5.547133,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),18,5.5609715648,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),49,4.82461,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),61,4.7104094857,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),139,2.424242,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),145,2.7246464898,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),57,4.778055,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),80,4.389753,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),70,4.5162446707,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),40,4.971121,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),40,5.05436848,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),15,5.689292,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),11,5.7949214023,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),134,2.993055,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),146,2.6768855747,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),6,5.967196,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),16,5.6391109105,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),25,5.425385,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),27,5.3384030139,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),129,3.213263,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),135,3.0893220729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),1,6.296577,3.534018,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),1,6.2599059773,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),98,4.030093,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),110,3.762797,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),115,3.6772778302,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),128,3.260182,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),134,3.0948718276,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),75,4.500885,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),84,4.2688913221,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),86,4.254275,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),86,4.2445791172,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),57,4.731914,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),55,4.8150358799,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),71,4.521262,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),80,4.3642526017,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),22,5.479535,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),19,5.4997386581,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),81,4.371776,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),93,4.1065478809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),74,4.50341,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),65,4.6142970663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),122,3.490835,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),128,3.4152214103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),58,4.728357,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),52,4.8591936403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),44,4.902516,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),31,5.2061173714,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),76,4.434978,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),71,4.5157009024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),27,5.334059,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),33,5.1483526222,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),116,3.580049,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),121,3.5339774599,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),29,5.269845,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),28,5.3264695951,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),23,5.469956,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),23,5.419773927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),83,4.35494,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),82,4.3108727512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),104,3.891673,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),97,4.0411020721,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),42,4.944715,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),44,4.944715,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),7,5.88347,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),6,5.962829254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),62,4.654817,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),58,4.7567040167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),72,4.521118,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),66,4.5933354491,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),99,3.957323,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),105,3.906770355,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),94,4.100203,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),107,3.8700898088,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),2,6.274415,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),2,6.1732941944,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),54,4.8,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),69,4.5231214135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),95,4.083644,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),132,3.127188,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),140,2.9853488104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),103,3.89591,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),132,3.2991649324,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),131,3.134924,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),144,2.7308338667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),60,4.719709,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),133,3.11627,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),137,3.0686766763,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),10,5.781696,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),10,5.8133696051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),36,5.135581,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),26,5.3434664088,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),24,5.431728,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),24,5.3939838872,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),91,4.179487,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),106,3.897362659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),95,4.036253,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),94,4.1030074479,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),113,3.739765,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),101,4.0007113598,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),69,4.550318,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),76,4.4398716779,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),105,3.860097,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),85,4.2600593485,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),106,3.824465,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),117,3.5873267153,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),46,4.884647,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),43,5.04083756,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),133,3.242115,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),78,4.40122,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),67,4.5599315558,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),79,4.399065,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),81,4.3123045883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),109,3.768863,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),116,3.5905190944,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),119,3.559384,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),136,3.0850512353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),92,4.125031,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),99,4.0261599125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),124,3.437321,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),126,3.4454447052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),26,5.382964,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),22,5.4464617189,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),90,4.187187,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),90,4.2034736273,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),70,4.543401,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),83,4.2908743671,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),102,3.924442,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),111,3.7530668973,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),4,6.028214,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),4,6.0100668438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),13,5.732643,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),8,5.8467039839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),111,3.760992,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),123,3.49884055,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),18,5.567618,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),15,5.6529155272,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),89,4.207184,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),89,4.207184,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),112,3.758345,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),103,3.9750293375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),19,5.548057,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),25,5.3596749384,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),67,4.613855,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),72,4.508298692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),51,4.820815,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),63,4.6636825172,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),43,4.936162,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),46,4.9357976517,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),32,5.189865,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),39,5.1072455906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),35,5.143006,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),32,5.1557692884,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),87,4.210692,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),77,4.4299660638,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),33,5.185694,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),37,5.1295594764,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),41,4.956539,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),42,5.0482778527,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),63,4.643764,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),49,4.9044279873,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),102,3.975762,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),50,4.823714,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),54,4.8287855876,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),73,4.511106,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),92,4.1508624042,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),30,5.268919,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),29,5.3127622384,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),138,2.618196,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),143,2.7333396,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),59,4.709947,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),73,4.495147959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),123,3.488605,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),109,3.7754556161,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),125,3.389606,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),119,3.5710303828,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),39,5.03375,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),36,5.1419995473,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),55,4.787644,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),45,4.9380468538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),11,5.776555,4.801278,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),5,5.9751363287,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),127,3.272712,3.373191,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),125,3.4729165145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),114,3.669839,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),113,3.7092057048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,4.103125,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),136,2.80894,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),148,2.4715769058,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),53,4.801278,5.49928,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),50,4.8671716484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),96,4.02976,3.666924,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),135,2.970588,6.296577,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),142,2.7415129652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),93,4.103125,6.033901,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),96,4.0795909986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),,,4.629405,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),114,3.6830406922,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),56,4.738805,4.25641,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),48,4.9078718615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),5,6.006871,4.738805,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),7,5.9267872113,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),126,3.373191,4.577782,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),120,3.5443050162,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),115,3.666924,5.183181,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),130,3.4008365475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),68,4.577782,3.192308,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),59,4.7494907203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),66,4.629405,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),74,4.4833432931,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),3,6.033901,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),3,6.169176201,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),85,4.25641,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),91,4.1597051258,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),34,5.183181,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),38,5.1145616244,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),130,3.192308,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),138,3.039438584,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),52,4.815299,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),62,4.7057433772,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),98,3.963511,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),100,4.0027111564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),121,3.534018,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ366,7.05 Business-to-consumer Internet use (1-7),127,3.4253012727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),144,3.181818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),135,3.787839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),17,5.931995,5.064892,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),10,5.931995,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),84,4.791607,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),106,4.4239778484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),54,5.196136,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),48,5.187338,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),31,5.618592,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),27,5.576533104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),3,6.214187,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),9,5.9494360118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),78,4.842237,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),47,5.1993079083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),138,3.260048,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),146,3.0284308099,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),21,5.775116,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),26,5.6198534367,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),123,4.191306,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),129,3.9794795644,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),115,4.317073,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),117,4.2560534898,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),126,4.101245,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),130,3.9614710688,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),96,4.639102,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),78,4.7726349194,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),29,5.643077,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),38,5.3510875802,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),105,4.468516,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),101,4.468516,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),132,3.88679,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),137,3.7350066466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),40,5.456107,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),54,5.1112470734,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),49,5.285003,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),70,4.8396968146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),55,5.175395,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),59,4.9959858513,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),134,3.796333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),120,4.215998,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),119,4.2499848886,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),27,5.655447,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),31,5.5214980508,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),2,6.279749,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),2,6.15442338,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),38,5.52971,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),35,5.4708542625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),89,4.733079,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),66,4.8679597619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),102,4.532727,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),120,4.218361904,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),53,5.207256,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),68,4.8492291315,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),70,4.951391,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),62,4.9209677735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),91,4.684958,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),100,4.4815104149,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),34,5.598506,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),43,5.2921902686,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),62,5.02524,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),76,4.8137659056,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),23,5.762649,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),24,5.6523399601,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),14,5.945809,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),20,5.71622503,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),22,5.774622,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),21,5.6906073449,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),47,5.355868,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),53,5.1358761857,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),139,2.65625,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),147,2.9716980847,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),95,4.571736,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),111,4.379886,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),81,4.7306142429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),46,5.365185,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),41,5.31566052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),15,5.940447,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),6,6.0480231294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),130,3.985093,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),141,3.5392314076,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),1,6.302248,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),1,6.1742714947,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),25,5.676872,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),37,5.4566876225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),104,4.493083,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),122,4.1399117776,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),4,6.115089,4.594363,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),5,6.0617361591,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),92,4.622077,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),85,4.776739,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),102,4.4418465537,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),103,4.525537,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),123,4.1182524724,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),64,5.020314,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),79,4.7559295466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),90,4.71179,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),107,4.41932505,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),44,5.37726,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),52,5.1576432787,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),61,5.064626,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),80,4.7523494309,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),18,5.923605,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),18,5.8114583744,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),65,5.017163,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),91,4.6261503305,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),52,5.219975,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),49,5.1841379225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),131,3.910069,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),138,3.7307616283,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),66,5.016219,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),42,5.2974532576,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),97,4.62316,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),63,4.9160642286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),59,5.096404,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),69,4.8481245304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),32,5.611041,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),33,5.4932978906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),133,3.858401,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),139,3.675153128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),30,5.622684,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),22,5.6786502141,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),42,5.42304,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),40,5.3217297757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),101,4.536397,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),113,4.3155295285,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),77,4.859786,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),75,4.81975105,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),50,5.25811,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),45,5.25811,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),7,6.049263,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),7,6.0045741451,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),63,5.021902,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),67,4.8554063024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),76,4.867858,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),57,5.0159607849,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),129,4.026717,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),133,3.81050607,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),87,4.741525,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),82,4.7254552794,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),19,5.862836,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),17,5.8350354223,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),72,4.916667,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),61,4.9317572108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),98,4.521529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),128,4.032659,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),136,3.7475681818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),122,4.198687,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),132,3.8548379784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),136,3.613502,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),142,3.5126716,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),58,5.011463,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),134,3.835828,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),143,3.4714026785,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),20,5.785128,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),4,6.0777546061,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),16,5.939553,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),15,5.8796360294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),45,5.369731,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),46,5.2043221692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),82,4.8,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),115,4.2678211082,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),92,4.671108,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),99,4.4994070085,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),110,4.388176,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),111,4.3741222072,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),57,5.109929,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),64,4.8990390074,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),71,4.938285,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),56,5.0220448211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),75,4.86845,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),85,4.6657447571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),5,6.068187,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),12,5.89842228,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),140,3.652931,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),81,4.800642,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),71,4.8360780078,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),83,4.799681,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),88,4.6425308772,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),108,4.403699,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),121,4.2142121388,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),114,4.317955,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),86,4.6609402059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),48,5.302418,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),60,4.9541416667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),106,4.453849,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),110,4.3923111009,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),33,5.602582,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),28,5.5707000081,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),58,5.109436,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),50,5.1692005329,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),99,4.613524,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),93,4.6183861822,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),124,4.179224,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),127,3.9991136205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),12,5.96937,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),11,5.928672813,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),8,6.012556,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),8,6.0000352818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),112,4.377898,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),128,3.9972903,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),11,5.974924,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),19,5.7312343891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),73,4.88375,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),65,4.88375,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),116,4.313879,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),104,4.4387191083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),39,5.515139,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),44,5.2802799741,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),79,4.826266,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),73,4.8219501877,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),51,5.22637,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),51,5.1666368828,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),95,4.655454,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),103,4.4417684019,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),41,5.45174,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),39,5.3356026453,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),37,5.573574,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),29,5.5622779093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),113,4.365628,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),109,4.4084424232,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),13,5.960659,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),16,5.8523911725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),86,4.74972,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),84,4.6945681144,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),107,4.448658,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),94,4.5891067483,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),90,4.631446,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),28,5.650305,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),23,5.6591132641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),56,5.142123,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),83,4.7113646146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),10,5.985425,,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),14,5.8799121573,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),127,4.034371,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),131,3.95931195,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),117,4.303147,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),105,4.4315836,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),118,4.23704,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),112,4.3228524116,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),125,4.174146,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),126,4.0281345046,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),43,5.404711,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),34,5.4915333473,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),26,5.656677,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),36,5.4707011269,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),6,6.060195,4.668226,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),3,6.1146852,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),98,4.617268,4.203397,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),114,4.3100193157,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),68,4.987566,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),96,4.5540069651,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,5.01373,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),137,3.49581,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),148,2.9235578754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),93,4.668226,5.931995,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),74,4.8213446062,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),119,4.225242,4.66173,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),135,3.657143,6.115089,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),145,3.1053291928,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),67,5.01373,5.592549,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),77,4.7737019548,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),,,4.973366,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),116,4.2584985677,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),74,4.881711,4.394737,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),55,5.0664476816,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),9,6.00357,4.881711,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),13,5.8819062496,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),121,4.203397,4.814825,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),125,4.1128093901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),94,4.66173,5.695356,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),118,4.254451082,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),80,4.814825,4.735849,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),87,4.6605970862,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),69,4.973366,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),89,4.6351492289,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),35,5.592549,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),25,5.6380460729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),109,4.394737,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),124,4.1154152452,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),24,5.695356,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),32,5.4986330146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),88,4.735849,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),97,4.544447356,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),36,5.591781,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),30,5.5603794946,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),60,5.064892,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),72,4.8266879017,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),100,4.594363,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ365,7.04 Business-to-business Internet use (1-7),108,4.4096294463,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",114,0.0157189361,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",118,0.0123882027,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",88,0.1560411,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",85,0.3170694664,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",44,4.4737122844,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",46,4.1524166555,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",49,4.4958833469,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",66,1.0756068773,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",66,1.1573491783,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",62,1.2528642396,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",62,1.2074636489,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",57,1.7140609921,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",50,3.4552132392,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",20,83.0632552485,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",20,77.5445405192,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",21,76.2429642271,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",10,143.9389764727,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",10,154.6553096068,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",10,159.6022149658,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",81,0.3860320799,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",77,0.3865552975,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",77,0.5586999004,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",16,102.0559787025,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",15,106.2006374095,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",16,110.6613578525,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",110,0.0290637823,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",110,0.0282489323,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",109,0.0312803439,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",113,0.0227704483,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",110,0.0234443677,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",115,0.0068013264,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",117,0.0080143223,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",117,0.0127111387,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",46,3.6138819381,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",47,3.6457132376,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",48,4.8000067239,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",51,2.0662723364,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",54,1.8821795243,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",69,0.9991511727,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",49,2.0901439957,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",53,1.9613584462,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",57,2.0185855732,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",55,1.7631469049,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",106,0.0397903757,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",99,0.0853207559,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",99,0.108964695,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",47,2.7493626278,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",50,2.8073431348,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",53,3.0385181429,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",32,11.4748374143,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",32,11.2980058541,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",43,6.2099899221,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",54,1.914061204,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",49,3.1334603429,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",58,1.8449639863,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",82,0.4112806044,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",106,0.0498269758,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",94,0.1581947733,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",21,77.4460568871,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",19,78.1083316753,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",19,82.3736024912,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",2,286.4356878709,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",2,284.6584394611,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",3,293.4945435259,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",45,3.6301100021,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",44,5.4915148894,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",41,6.3241963549,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",38,6.5068692204,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",35,9.0263411383,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CHN,China,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",32,11.4869636423,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",111,0.0253321039,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",105,0.0515730981,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",86,0.2433720914,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",85,0.1913373763,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",104,0.0590841335,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",65,1.082781042,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",68,1.0442174997,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",68,1.0054871674,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",57,1.6645646319,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",58,1.6453449484,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",63,1.2494813616,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",35,9.4148747073,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",38,7.6564336242,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",47,5.2357951348,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",28,18.2713344362,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",29,14.6902543238,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",29,15.3435025742,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",7,202.5436998741,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",5,209.1330809529,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",6,210.4579327797,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",5,209.4108388245,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",7,196.6722416744,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",7,208.4885366797,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",83,0.357257617,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",81,0.2392387875,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",83,0.4065001392,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",91,0.1984968999,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",98,0.0881070732,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",98,0.1097068907,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0.1665315015,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",97,0.0890095563,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",81,0.4143422935,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",73,0.6255524572,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",72,0.6232600167,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",75,0.5901463573,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",25,34.9990100504,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",25,38.040151312,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",25,39.1944440494,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",26,34.1596683199,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",26,34.3288977966,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",26,31.1477290464,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0.0020092536,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",121,0.0018644251,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",3,276.1348056963,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",3,279.3043099909,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",4,283.5914940621,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",14,110.023947888,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",14,108.1749188196,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,FRA,France,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",15,111.2979996306,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",87,0.1660618693,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",86,0.3136695955,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",18,92.5097225124,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",18,87.2742045653,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",17,86.9775425501,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",60,1.4708501966,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",60,1.4410408432,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",66,1.1523992208,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",108,0.0314803284,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",114,0.0184488056,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",107,0.0483467312,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",36,9.2497388938,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",37,8.611875345,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",37,7.2143999198,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",76,0.4631733373,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",90,0.1389957515,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",101,0.0831071798,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,,,, +2014,GUY,Guyana,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,HND,Honduras,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",33,10.0854876246,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",34,9.8381351182,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",34,9.7795869738,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",111,0.0253440685,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",27,22.0302482159,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",28,22.3442405882,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",28,24.2053865996,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",100,0.0705422658,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",101,0.0749329729,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",103,0.0658347966,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",63,1.1569452561,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",62,1.3198802435,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IND,India,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",61,1.4675687931,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",19,89.8044353849,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",21,76.4590806459,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",20,79.0681115482,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",99,0.0707764663,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",104,0.0614333033,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",106,0.0490189893,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",17,95.996651577,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",17,95.4741135252,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",18,84.1002798205,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",4,234.3991525069,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",6,209.0829247239,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",5,215.8141886224,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",24,51.5536805974,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",24,51.0141658324,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",24,51.7906736519,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",71,0.6774636056,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",73,0.5550827073,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",74,0.6465915389,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",75,0.5252018415,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",84,0.2067140731,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",80,0.43142965,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",6,207.4230972354,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",4,251.1366229348,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",1,301.0675531133,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",64,1.1074770833,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",65,1.2173425454,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",70,0.9885480952,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0.1158432617,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0.1065509972,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",93,0.1588231015,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",101,0.0664023978,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",91,0.1376677252,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0.1360026113,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",9,160.878478336,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",9,172.1477441865,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",8,198.3525807603,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",82,0.3589936991,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",83,0.2192395894,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",89,0.2800264345,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",113,0.0191679162,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",67,0.8915119328,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",64,1.2990042965,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",60,1.5063427924,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",79,0.3540456879,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",69,0.7106291707,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",74,0.5243674965,,,, +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",76,0.5836008753,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",87,0.2326445968,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",39,6.2105350428,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",45,4.5890354,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",45,5.799998878,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",15,103.2559530019,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",16,100.0680852413,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",14,112.64057622,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",30,12.4542051651,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",33,10.0105450611,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",36,8.8069466767,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",74,0.6192067783,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",76,0.4644023772,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",78,0.5015487826,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",70,0.7054594419,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",78,0.3860123715,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",73,0.6786862469,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",112,0.0241384749,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",108,0.0461277293,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",58,1.6212545924,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",59,1.5840333672,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",59,1.6549653815,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",59,1.5396316585,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",70,0.7279563886,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",29,12.9248751666,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",36,8.6940147518,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",33,10.1997715251,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",51,3.222459252,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",89,0.2274130585,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",105,0.0604740951,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",87,0.3025672102,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average,Assumed Value, ,20/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",102,0.0645190095,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",103,0.0650572035,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0.0055925255,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",120,0.0053911154,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",34,9.5227669004,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",31,11.9619018139,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",31,12.5469557878,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",85,0.2973432087,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",102,0.072994118,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",116,0.0053941597,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",118,0.0073642421,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",114,0.0163425637,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",100,0.0903167057,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",8,202.5293184567,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",8,180.8735256629,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",9,189.021222428,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",11,143.7955529643,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",11,144.4303220577,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",12,133.6376222912,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",112,0.0184035401,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",120,0.0055630909,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",116,0.0153432404,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",22,75.2132944566,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",22,71.8506705236,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",22,69.8456064288,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",78,0.4367486091,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",63,1.301746064,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",71,0.9826262135,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",113,0.016817341,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",115,0.0170691716,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",112,0.0199148888,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",77,0.4429165748,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",75,0.4739129858,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",64,1.2253977998,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",88,0.2277060008,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",82,0.2221151331,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",90,0.2638542957,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",84,0.2975714353,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",80,0.2587738763,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",84,0.3206007832,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",42,5.7024229512,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",40,6.6869716855,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",38,6.8987861062,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,PRT,Portugal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",31,12.1071462363,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",30,12.1988614548,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",30,12.6936230321,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",98,0.0788408254,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",92,0.1161971373,,,, +2014,PRY,Paraguay,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",97,0.1141014654,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",61,1.2685130256,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",56,1.8343207394,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",46,5.4293731442,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",56,1.7471734328,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",55,1.8482237323,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",56,2.1048612014,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",43,5.3543107207,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",43,5.9678519057,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",39,6.7887295972,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average,Assumed Value, ,20/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",48,2.098685796,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",48,3.2021869825,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",42,6.2391685281,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",107,0.0357923652,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",109,0.0331758906,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",102,0.0734518029,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",13,123.0256725761,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",13,120.4286215871,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",13,120.8952184338,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",94,0.1065183068,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",109,0.0426221778,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",79,0.4058162889,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",100,0.0807364065,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0.0088800202,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",52,2.7806593927,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",55,2.1642376365,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",92,0.1923591114,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",71,0.6671292096,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",79,0.4719109183,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",40,5.9614049255,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",39,7.1797081368,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",35,8.8353561032,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",23,65.5534169756,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",23,60.7329171279,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",23,58.6255067977,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",1,310.6720986779,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",1,297.1230870907,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",2,294.453445917,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",90,0.2139778918,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",95,0.09474129,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a,,n/a,01/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",27,26.0040450737,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",27,25.731636189,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",80,0.3864615199,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",104,0.0457160036,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",107,0.0445346697,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",72,0.6271419607,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",69,0.9567620709,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",65,1.2217800786,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",119,0,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",88,0.2834756381,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",53,2.0391379797,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",61,1.4225740764,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",72,0.9595558763,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",68,0.7521815366,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",67,1.0731104824,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",41,5.7562189508,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",41,6.4639761152,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",44,6.1586423289,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,TZA,Tanzania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",117,0.00382924,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",116,0.0167256801,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",115,0.0161796216,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",118,0.0022067713,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",121,0.0037397512,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",111,0.0213383019,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",50,2.0793570489,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",51,2.8032360464,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",52,3.1539712083,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",52,2.0551672415,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",67,1.1370687183,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",54,2.2229820284,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",12,137.5389043308,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",12,134.4284051781,,,, +2014,USA,United States,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",11,143.8700771289,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",94,0.1174617889,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",86,0.1713833206,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",91,0.2471699046,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0.0956614848,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",89,0.1407299783,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",92,0.2128310082,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",105,0.0428665478,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",108,0.0415756956,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",37,6.7210659931,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",42,5.9913798017,2009-2010 average,,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);Patent Database;http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm,10/01/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",40,6.3599340664,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",103,0.0458460373,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",123,0,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",122,0,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",97,0.090187648,2008-09 average,,OECD for Patents and UNDESA for population,01/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0.0894884554,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,PCTPATENTAPPLPC,"7.03 PCT patents, applications/million pop. ",96,0.1310003984,2010-2011 average, ,"Author's calculation based on OECD; Patent Database, January 2014 and World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013)",20/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),141,1.5819588375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),146,2.5,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),119,2.3975686927,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),128,2.3957317344,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),121,2.96502625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),32,3.777558585,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),27,4.0137955134,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),39,3.966231,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),77,2.9459083158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),95,2.8615884595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),91,3.3254203543,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),61,3.1398747193,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),62,3.231617716,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),77,3.4433475179,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),27,3.9759688692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),32,3.8544445143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),23,4.456633152,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),12,4.8336770857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),9,5.0181741179,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),14,4.9611039809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),52,3.2421721711,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),39,3.545094645,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),35,4.0531587194,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),140,1.7868031304,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),144,1.7816216675,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),148,2.2368137069,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),14,4.7477245472,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),11,4.9775406662,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),10,5.0732666497,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),79,2.8889876857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),121,2.4861515846,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),114,3.0446120838,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),128,2.2943404203,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),135,2.2746345259,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),119,2.9842775612,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),121,2.380164181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),131,2.3544007645,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),120,2.9774373516,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),82,2.8759309527,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),64,3.2002583171,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),103,3.1790802925,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),117,2.4079608111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),117,2.5364018828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),82,3.3859034981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),124,2.355909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),101,2.78410985,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),108,3.134456,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),131,2.275979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),70,2.9864488649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),61,3.2382546801,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),70,3.4802464274,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),31,3.7854383405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),34,3.738287703,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),36,4.0183120863,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),91,2.7348049987,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),91,2.895358389,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),81,3.4032951366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),75,2.9586218173,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),68,3.1686568148,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),67,3.5162514103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),78,3.43101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),104,2.6136039119,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),96,2.8452441825,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),102,3.1816361042,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),24,4.1379476957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),25,4.0678737453,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),27,4.2773791254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),2,5.7652130392,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),2,5.8404082473,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),1,5.8363405033,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),66,3.0442743887,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),83,2.9900162216,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),63,3.5485142,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),23,4.228949956,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),23,4.1025072062,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),30,4.1888137381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),133,2.1513958022,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),139,2.1692742339,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),127,2.8706694786,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),114,2.5049433682,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),110,2.6700696069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),105,3.1432825063,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),59,3.1721340614,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),66,3.1888786234,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),83,3.3818253653,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),137,2.0634216423,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),137,2.2614750162,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),126,2.885002883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),40,3.4293036681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),43,3.4845290492,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),37,4.0114978696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),60,3.1669112577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),89,2.9221392528,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),93,3.2830330366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),25,4.0360519169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),22,4.1348968829,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),26,4.3174346784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),3,5.7348211387,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),3,5.6578369059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),3,5.61694587,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),9,5.1073327176,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),13,4.9270071602,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),13,4.9919737774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),126,2.3214165299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),118,2.5105339034,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),98,3.2177017571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),138,2.0398368435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),143,1.8709538125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),147,2.3060007908,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),87,2.7830964755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),82,2.995786,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),53,3.686498719,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),83,2.8290821814,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),80,3.0215209969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),111,3.1070016737,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),36,3.5245620786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),44,3.4806502799,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),57,3.66021578,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),34,3.7291292333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),33,3.8365120213,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),28,4.2704269808,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),125,2.3438366417,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),133,2.3342214875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),141,2.5891202709,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),5,5.5503662397,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),4,5.6477979478,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),2,5.6587862789,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),8,5.1306860844,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),10,5.0145667126,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),16,4.8465448665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),141,1.984323,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),144,2.5450568617,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),13,4.751512,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),12,4.9616271077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),8,5.1528347727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),103,2.6167193734,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),116,2.538586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),118,2.9953250053,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),93,2.7285197941,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),81,3.0213161828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),55,3.6742355879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),127,2.414886,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),145,2.5410918034,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),62,3.0729078707,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),52,3.3487606534,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),65,3.5366168209,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),96,2.706761275,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),104,2.7469624042,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),117,3.0038430109,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),69,2.9887131875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),67,3.1724703081,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),51,3.7202165065,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),73,2.9713857765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),35,3.6772259052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),38,3.9953972818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),39,3.4551592323,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),37,3.6281885875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),29,4.2278012163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),88,2.7720275691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),98,2.8204937175,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),112,3.0940712128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),64,3.0631577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),72,3.1391243608,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),110,3.1222871695,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),130,2.280874,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),138,2.2599668385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),140,2.5936892658,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),41,3.4239921099,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),45,3.4532768889,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),97,3.233376389,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),30,3.79967415,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),30,3.8601245391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),24,4.3926347371,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),35,3.6047500071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),42,3.503007973,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),41,3.9568475391,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),33,3.7661125856,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),26,4.022477718,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),20,4.6385698821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),67,3.0391286566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),59,3.2537612909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),85,3.3802412184,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),18,4.366689019,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),21,4.401077019,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),32,4.1492363832,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),6,5.2759199768,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),6,5.3539428745,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),4,5.6123394703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),26,4.013523422,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),28,4.0020566011,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),31,4.1543129227,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),97,2.7055581322,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),85,2.9480835758,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),60,3.6058814838,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),92,2.7315384889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),57,3.2633812762,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),69,3.488171,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),1,5.8396832326,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),1,5.8689877806,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),6,5.5570569726,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),101,2.637412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),92,2.8813963778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),74,3.4551698452,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),47,3.3294863122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),46,3.4514595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),34,4.0994565019,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),139,2.0087191534,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),140,2.13843925,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),138,2.61864841,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),85,2.814580381,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),65,3.1949925944,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),71,3.4785502206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),20,4.3315237167,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),19,4.4963276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),22,4.5486235855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),90,2.7509435764,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),113,2.6428069184,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),136,2.6416400892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),46,3.77739,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),106,2.5887178047,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),114,2.5848603953,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),89,3.3589095506,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),36,3.638057,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),68,3.5116429081,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),123,2.466835,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),143,2.547283,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),50,3.2785429655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),93,2.878938,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),44,3.8421560415,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),136,2.095401852,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),119,2.507035544,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),130,2.8259303231,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),48,3.3127927444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),47,3.440141058,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),40,3.9636099541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),16,4.4933961325,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),16,4.6437065813,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),11,5.0642643941,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),43,3.389226558,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),49,3.3725023912,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),66,3.5166827077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),108,2.560112,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),115,2.5567515821,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),129,2.842797482,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),107,2.5716038183,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),122,2.4850415727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),134,2.7450926462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),113,2.5092277183,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),97,2.8335043888,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),73,3.4600830795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),76,2.9569803625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),75,3.1080236203,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),75,3.4542049575,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),86,2.8121739552,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),99,2.7958077873,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),94,3.2462574474,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),105,2.6060948566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),111,2.6631144818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),104,3.1738482276,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),63,3.0632312,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),70,3.1581472182,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),47,3.77418443,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),135,2.696395,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),53,3.2410829318,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),53,3.3122813091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),59,3.6270025922,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),72,2.9766364273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),73,3.1296706237,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),107,3.1429570556,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),127,2.3109315678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),132,2.3402506414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),132,2.7932721663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),118,2.4056494427,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),108,2.6836021163,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),137,2.6260349412,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),89,2.7693114006,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),112,2.6607710403,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),72,3.4696894208,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),81,2.8802077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),100,2.79050684,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),116,3.014129975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),19,4.3465246274,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),17,4.6372950229,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),15,4.8692839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),102,2.6181588872,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),90,2.9095172338,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),84,3.3814159714,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),54,3.2246129222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),63,3.2089586318,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),80,3.4079695596,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),111,2.5209992273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),87,2.9394427118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),79,3.4155079788,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),10,4.9884257306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),8,5.0501072899,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),9,5.105827826,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),17,4.487356995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),14,4.7239418566,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),12,5.0440939643,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),129,2.28763513,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),126,2.419321,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),125,2.89186645,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),29,3.8234725553,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),24,4.0760516519,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),21,4.5731001717,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),57,3.1845528656,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),50,3.3640140392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),61,3.587843,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),51,3.2536781954,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),60,3.2531778083,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),49,3.7379463417,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),98,2.697618112,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),94,2.8754112861,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),50,3.7298455228,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),99,2.6823797644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),103,2.7595933918,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),106,3.1431397543,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),95,2.71332656,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),86,2.9447978667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),48,3.7612224934,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),49,3.3030878896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),54,3.3121038322,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),62,3.5790619473,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),45,3.3820861189,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),38,3.6214745903,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),25,4.3807947203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),37,3.4702776582,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),40,3.5408046837,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),42,3.9026344047,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),116,2.4295645963,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),109,2.6814874391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),115,3.0312299507,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),11,4.972016,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),18,4.5661986636,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),17,4.8250564044,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),78,2.9337860351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),77,3.0616109167,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),90,3.3535585612,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),38,3.4611618133,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),56,3.2842247173,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),64,3.5404815797,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),80,2.8874828945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),55,3.293392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),76,3.4519230678,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),21,4.331192,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),29,3.8849830154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),43,3.8524809534,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),74,2.9670947843,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),69,3.1605763435,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),92,3.283493026,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),22,4.2974446409,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),20,4.4405691939,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),18,4.776875264,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),136,2.270365,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),131,2.8244152,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),115,2.4615527429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),107,2.6953342435,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),56,3.669405959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),110,2.534243528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),120,2.492123575,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),133,2.7930524719,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),100,2.639086,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),106,2.7069438789,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),113,3.0752914954,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),84,2.82605515,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),88,2.9317651521,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),96,3.235529444,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),28,3.868721,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),31,3.8589609697,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),54,3.6786713856,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),4,5.6896648652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),5,5.4828794,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),7,5.4672863959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),135,2.1171189474,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),130,2.3598361319,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),95,3.2426085663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),84,2.974212,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),58,3.6472971429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),134,2.1332565577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),109,2.5501562255,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),105,2.7137342358,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),139,2.6108075101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),56,3.1907867868,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),79,3.0311962577,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),87,3.3600677975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),68,2.9906820442,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),51,3.3524841535,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),132,2.1919408,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),125,2.4399320773,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),124,2.9111517493,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),120,2.3971808762,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),124,2.4412146936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),123,2.916324147,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),44,3.3866897662,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),99,3.217662809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),71,2.9804334849,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),48,3.3844486579,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),45,3.7832523983,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),15,4.6534753699,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),15,4.6600357304,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),19,4.775446034,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),55,3.207686909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),71,3.1490983948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),101,3.1886631539,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),112,2.5208918637,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),102,2.7598204989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),109,3.1311220951,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),42,3.41567165,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),58,3.2582247746,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),100,3.2062391995,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),65,3.0498398012,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),74,3.1115234724,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),88,3.3590487763,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),7,5.186793318,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),7,5.2295399016,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),5,5.6068252412,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),123,2.3601554554,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),134,2.3210355571,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),128,2.845578771,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),58,3.17632714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),78,3.03226695,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),86,3.3736149951,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),142,1.526166,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),142,1.9029820571,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),142,2.581073844,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),46,3.3754709,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),41,3.5165343412,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),33,4.1195454663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),94,2.7252945857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),76,3.0783707846,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),52,3.6891956961,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),122,2.3799392333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),129,2.3952504,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ119,7.02 Capacity for innovation (1-7),122,2.9383025157,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),133,3.6839738859,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),145,3.294118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),73,4.7437900896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),80,4.6441644063,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),108,4.24409585,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),16,5.9163034224,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),12,5.9573878289,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),4,6.077902,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),93,4.4858204211,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),106,4.3143025135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),115,4.1061964249,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),114,4.1121493689,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),96,4.4260606969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),98,4.3598726256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),19,5.8309394615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),15,5.8963606571,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),14,5.819097048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),12,5.9482718698,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),13,5.9304740861,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),17,5.7592313765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),66,4.8228111289,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),73,4.7467379969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),59,4.8695050583,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),142,3.1981650348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),143,3.4828724355,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),143,3.4533859525,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),26,5.6046878194,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),31,5.5525236887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),26,5.5929000568,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),101,4.3384868714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),114,4.2009849615,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),122,3.9768289068,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),106,4.208504619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),118,4.089382716,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),140,3.6910154684,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),95,4.4150980652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),111,4.2465135065,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),111,4.2021452293,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),127,3.8785927913,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),125,3.9923759732,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),113,4.1568819373,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),20,5.7301107357,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),21,5.7969682828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),30,5.4910430104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),107,4.204548,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),105,4.3216705,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),93,4.417498,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),129,3.856145,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),139,3.5834014679,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),138,3.6901004126,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),125,3.9423028795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),48,5.1563064306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),47,5.1545377247,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),51,4.9993475647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),38,5.4407460632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),37,5.4240790486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),44,5.1566257902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),63,4.8574024649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),62,4.8518558704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),63,4.7834320513,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),138,3.700019,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),91,4.5348887523,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),98,4.394638232,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),101,4.3399529629,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),29,5.5614775479,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),30,5.5543798139,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),34,5.4486265818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),4,6.2250938081,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),3,6.1981932675,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),3,6.11944958,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),40,5.3550764264,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),44,5.1940948216,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),45,5.09576335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),61,4.910625741,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),71,4.7496209779,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),71,4.6894129524,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),65,4.8322587288,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),66,4.8321415393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),67,4.7205051353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),108,4.1945947487,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),113,4.2066811483,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),94,4.3950012741,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),83,4.6239690084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),93,4.4442975515,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),97,4.360027798,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),64,4.841157763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),76,4.6856628398,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),85,4.5225607277,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),55,4.9731871447,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),50,5.0735703528,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),43,5.1930503853,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),43,5.2183799005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),43,5.1988688045,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),38,5.2405406887,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),45,5.2077975506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),49,5.0758507734,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),54,4.9495341507,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),14,5.9323773963,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),16,5.8760090941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),16,5.7749591434,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),9,5.9933416235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),18,5.8426894118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),20,5.7245551143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),57,4.9648616485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),57,4.9026175931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),56,4.8998293524,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),134,3.6750464435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),144,3.1605786708,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),147,3.1680502122,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),103,4.2963837133,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),101,4.327949,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),87,4.490802181,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),78,4.6989017279,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),86,4.5640227887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),110,4.204048515,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),46,5.1782634446,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),48,5.0881158531,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),49,5.04447008,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),36,5.465722175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),34,5.5050872242,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),36,5.380409548,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),135,3.6693111917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),139,3.6770195375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),131,3.8347121266,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),11,5.9584541015,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),6,6.0537025913,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),7,6.0319113895,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),25,5.6172757063,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),35,5.4898692353,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),32,5.4601808651,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),97,4.397061,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),96,4.3810783907,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),22,5.719066,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),23,5.7286333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),24,5.6534533864,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),115,4.0659596883,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),123,4.037431,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),117,4.1001064018,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),109,4.1888247254,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),115,4.1522492442,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),91,4.4313927376,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),135,3.764924,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),129,3.8994746241,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),87,4.5766192464,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),68,4.7915523871,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),60,4.8640051043,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),89,4.5561268574,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),94,4.4350317381,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),88,4.4835099454,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),47,5.1631890188,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),45,5.1921908832,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),41,5.2173209935,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),96,4.4118262235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),74,4.7409597977,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),69,4.6989348652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),15,5.9287705032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),7,6.0402499125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),12,5.887666,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),67,4.817602305,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),60,4.8792842398,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),74,4.6838835163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),80,4.6744351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),77,4.6714076216,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),76,4.6528600369,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),132,3.779356,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),130,3.8996427136,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),132,3.8342732065,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),59,4.9469284802,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),64,4.8393002837,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),73,4.6870571749,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),54,4.9833524,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),56,4.9478896391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),46,5.08139904,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),41,5.2759852103,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),40,5.2385949622,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),48,5.0485645527,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),35,5.4879900474,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),33,5.5309706865,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),25,5.617709735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),120,4.0260911702,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),119,4.081997947,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),120,3.988869354,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),2,6.3308863796,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),2,6.2625488793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),2,6.1908646527,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),6,6.1339973268,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),5,6.1587654092,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),5,6.0698729568,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),102,4.3181918637,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),104,4.3229384793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),112,4.1871418297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),72,4.7442556958,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),67,4.8054489984,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),65,4.7587069625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),37,5.4499101746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),28,5.5688953048,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),27,5.592327,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),3,6.2724959272,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),4,6.1643323097,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),6,6.0641314199,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),113,4.114264,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),91,4.4802725644,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),78,4.6275504952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),60,4.9251447146,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),58,4.8908992556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),66,4.7560664755,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),138,3.5971171674,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),136,3.7316544,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),139,3.698033435,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),77,4.7004462916,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),61,4.8628740056,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),82,4.5892596324,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),8,6.0351173278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),11,5.9970262667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),21,5.7085601609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),39,5.4086650717,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),41,5.2305889793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),57,4.8957331351,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),90,4.46608,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),68,4.8050403888,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),70,4.7566582837,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),86,4.4929964052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),89,4.524773,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),136,3.7549434919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),108,4.300761,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),142,3.6353540667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),42,5.2304461034,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),42,5.219533,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),47,5.0809608,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),122,3.9922107089,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),127,3.9832159833,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),141,3.6880350489,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),53,5.0198784984,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),53,5.0132564761,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),42,5.2130333561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),24,5.6514879422,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),24,5.6398974875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),11,5.9027186529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),94,4.4667362586,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),90,4.5099792175,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),68,4.7033605846,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),74,4.741127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),75,4.6961562522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),95,4.3934412918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),126,3.8792401366,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),128,3.9576271273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),124,3.952435159,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),131,3.8142704692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),132,3.842136818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),106,4.2611526418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),81,4.6472965875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),63,4.8405777949,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),64,4.7623673251,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),121,3.9980361165,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),133,3.811181526,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),121,3.9868537082,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),112,4.1562702041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),87,4.5408976429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),84,4.5291805061,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),34,5.5020779222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),32,5.5327335455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),31,5.48305702,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),148,2.733189,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),99,4.3592612796,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),100,4.3551300883,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),89,4.477621987,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),90,4.5419448182,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),81,4.6375844379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),79,4.619948355,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),98,4.372710976,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),110,4.2561678276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),107,4.2536410927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),140,3.575478742,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),107,4.3126226059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),109,4.2384997059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),56,4.9724468637,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),55,4.9483307156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),52,4.968718775,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),104,4.2400329333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),134,3.794790472,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),133,3.830616094,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),28,5.591378997,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),29,5.555193503,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),33,5.4574133568,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),51,5.0761023179,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),65,4.8351594121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),58,4.8870553366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),79,4.6855053763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),72,4.7482244,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),80,4.6111058028,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),118,4.0435721108,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),122,4.0471015,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),130,3.8572370932,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),21,5.7221051935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),22,5.7575151556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),22,5.6825238166,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),5,6.1343081227,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),10,5.9980404131,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),8,6.010593393,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),116,4.052402165,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),120,4.0772026923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),128,3.92059745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),17,5.9095125394,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),17,5.8566683151,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),19,5.7394839348,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),49,5.1547854644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),52,5.0278241743,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),53,4.956597,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),92,4.494316773,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),85,4.5746326917,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),81,4.6017788375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),32,5.5333417715,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),25,5.6055109184,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),28,5.553507411,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),62,4.898368746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),79,4.6513024784,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),83,4.5600269716,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),52,5.0648662629,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),46,5.1695938333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),40,5.2179897048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),100,4.3453263532,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),112,4.2310433619,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),114,4.1485339686,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),33,5.5032712561,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),26,5.5873118239,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),23,5.67418685,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),27,5.6002966059,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),27,5.5835449928,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),29,5.5369147814,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),110,4.1874899721,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),102,4.3268079299,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),103,4.2836148783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),7,6.036975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),9,5.9998348864,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),10,5.9060922524,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),117,4.050447068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),116,4.1384856802,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),104,4.2744308139,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),130,3.8186785322,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),141,3.6335945461,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),126,3.9373549898,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),69,4.7948604521,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),84,4.578528,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),61,4.8252889388,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),23,5.676652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),20,5.8213082462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),15,5.781052994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),31,5.5359668874,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),36,5.4830815717,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),39,5.2331089125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),10,5.967319735,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),8,6.0224449697,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),13,5.8335414,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),131,3.864755,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),134,3.79223365,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),85,4.6069030714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),92,4.4741752661,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),102,4.2850484821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),136,3.6550425441,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),142,3.55417375,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),137,3.7203964126,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),124,3.918435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),121,4.0709570085,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),105,4.2658704184,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),58,4.9604260571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),59,4.8798495562,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),72,4.6875146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),84,4.611461,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),78,4.6601882654,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),62,4.8169670115,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),1,6.4607746928,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),1,6.3043774734,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),1,6.2343398484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),128,3.8597349526,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),124,4.0022611165,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),123,3.9601734217,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),51,5.062567,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),55,4.9051061873,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),70,4.7605812827,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),141,3.5596264691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),137,3.6910461817,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),144,3.4163425551,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),75,4.7325891544,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),54,4.9790781269,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),50,5.0170633292,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),119,4.0269742784,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),95,4.4301003606,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),137,3.6314451934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),140,3.6727073909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),146,3.2818917261,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),71,4.7539591857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),82,4.6296511386,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),75,4.6827795138,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),50,5.0933923632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),70,4.6916523659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),44,5.2164842247,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),39,5.2980773604,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),37,5.3432498609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),13,5.9381337165,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),19,5.8272075217,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),18,5.7579419177,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),125,3.9089318169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),129,3.9220484408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),127,3.9293078403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),97,4.4090018703,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),103,4.3246334478,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),116,4.103203777,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),82,4.6399866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),69,4.7598743906,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),100,4.3407613903,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),76,4.7221140646,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),83,4.6163141509,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),92,4.4214094451,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),18,5.9017823352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),14,5.8990810295,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),9,5.9935925729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),105,4.2185939952,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),117,4.1183775714,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),118,4.0966778935,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),88,4.56123506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),126,3.9835433,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),135,3.7649534634,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),123,3.987561,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),109,4.281245381,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),119,4.07509696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),30,5.5361461,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),38,5.4165699912,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),35,5.3858857196,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),86,4.6045394514,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),88,4.5285979626,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),77,4.6338092525,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),111,4.1770638,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),99,4.3602934333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ068,7.01 Firm-level technology absorption (1-7),99,4.3452207256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),137,2.6656755776,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),143,2.6359033292,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),74,3.5057313123,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),79,3.3801730269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),107,3.2368968868,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),30,4.202382925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),28,4.3122377797,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),29,4.3710746001,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),86,3.4205989671,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),90,3.2757393608,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),99,3.329458664,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),104,3.2084320943,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),89,3.3023607867,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),82,3.4548607789,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),22,4.8234607675,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),25,4.5355785502,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),24,4.7503254542,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),11,5.3942037802,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),9,5.3902406562,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),11,5.443942078,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),72,3.5093562981,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),58,3.5680192389,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),52,3.7777397755,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),142,2.453260247,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),143,2.3088546299,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),148,2.4177070893,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),19,5.0326967207,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),17,4.9405149529,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),18,5.0525935846,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),106,3.1810136758,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),117,3.0054555613,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),128,2.9978983258,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),131,2.8575853824,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),131,2.8257151327,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),135,2.8789720515,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),118,3.0546250666,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),132,2.8098437227,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),127,3.0025640882,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),101,3.2330605117,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),101,3.1794643824,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),104,3.2866090454,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),39,3.93945998,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),56,3.5854690884,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),49,3.8056576382,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),126,2.9593953575,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),104,3.1500959756,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),92,3.4176855134,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),119,3.0512776913,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),123,2.9819314286,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),109,3.0910118732,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),118,3.159224601,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),33,4.0377342337,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),34,3.8963776396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),41,3.9177262901,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),41,3.8821682912,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),43,3.7194298066,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),53,3.7729457844,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),61,3.6112538918,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),59,3.5640310085,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),56,3.7329144978,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),130,2.9884849836,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),87,3.3918421343,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),96,3.2337614935,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),106,3.247117361,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),23,4.7840360371,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),24,4.538018411,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),25,4.631356278,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),2,6.1318424615,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),1,6.1058826328,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),1,6.098895325,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),42,3.8796212501,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),44,3.7107181918,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),45,3.8853199531,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),37,3.9679918839,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),35,3.8647149046,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),44,3.8878112104,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),105,3.2041660114,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),105,3.1418173858,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),96,3.3657116649,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),107,3.1771940399,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),98,3.2137865921,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),95,3.3758440407,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),71,3.5114544309,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),77,3.3889118858,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),79,3.4729287234,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),110,3.1551877295,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),122,2.9566809891,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),115,3.1909451562,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),43,3.8577786764,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),37,3.8393147924,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),38,4.0091682587,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),50,3.7358028449,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),60,3.5058609692,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),58,3.7096290678,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),29,4.2045551172,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),31,4.0848789788,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),31,4.0999677181,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),6,5.8631756047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),5,5.812453693,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),5,5.8499768363,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),4,5.9590142488,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),7,5.5595291559,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),7,5.6589948969,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),95,3.3275242706,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),82,3.3597323227,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),67,3.6025175194,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),140,2.5988839149,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),144,2.1499171569,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),147,2.4738497557,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),100,3.2389974831,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),92,3.2694793134,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),71,3.5863258953,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),103,3.2268387767,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),108,3.1134029063,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),112,3.2065545788,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),40,3.888123384,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),41,3.7980904969,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),40,3.9576548643,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),28,4.3534442132,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),29,4.1327938182,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),28,4.3775780459,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),136,2.7052346021,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),140,2.6177259046,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),141,2.7663526271,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),5,5.9558190235,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),3,5.9685618906,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),2,6.0236138995,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),17,5.0651149916,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),18,4.8588932741,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),20,4.8750805277,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),130,2.8464793093,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),126,3.0232032307,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),16,5.0870646964,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),15,5.05307326,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),17,5.0611072689,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),109,3.1731333648,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),112,3.0698300702,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),110,3.214961093,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),99,3.248279891,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),103,3.1510711107,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),90,3.4186076872,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),128,2.85929125,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),138,2.8511442059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),65,3.543029331,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),50,3.6440655654,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),60,3.6907349671,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),97,3.3002614129,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),107,3.1141409338,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),102,3.3020479314,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),53,3.7300240191,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),49,3.6464084206,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),42,3.8951094301,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),82,3.4580311212,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),54,3.6009368817,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),63,3.662011363,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),20,4.9910675548,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),19,4.7696879575,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),16,5.1271942616,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),73,3.5087982798,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),75,3.4033245821,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),91,3.4181278081,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),79,3.4794776565,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),81,3.3610948435,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),81,3.4577353059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),135,2.7062881643,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),142,2.5552816027,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),140,2.7674621714,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),54,3.696356762,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),61,3.5046139975,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),62,3.6685065788,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),49,3.7616253748,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),40,3.8063264015,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),36,4.0267681516,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),47,3.8141067881,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),45,3.6984810003,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),51,3.7787905576,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),25,4.6585840325,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),22,4.5848017316,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),23,4.7520513021,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),121,3.0025641642,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),119,2.9852161893,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),129,2.9965744499,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),15,5.1103766455,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),20,4.7678865199,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),22,4.8041485335,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),7,5.8027754203,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),6,5.6736989716,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),8,5.6588791286,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),45,3.8172454537,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),46,3.6830169302,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),61,3.6829413314,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),67,3.5319925873,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),86,3.3227530229,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),72,3.5752154729,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),69,3.5236188149,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),55,3.5906233537,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),47,3.8141734779,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),3,6.0935372353,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),2,6.0113829701,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),4,5.9904978377,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),93,3.3405112305,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),85,3.3396384353,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),66,3.6128047986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),56,3.6486178534,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),53,3.6204513266,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),54,3.7635001182,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),134,2.7671994294,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),138,2.6467441053,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),137,2.8754939297,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),89,3.3718517632,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),70,3.4448586556,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),78,3.4802999529,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),12,5.3603435925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),11,5.3064839043,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),10,5.4847967658,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),80,3.4716414627,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),83,3.3530633658,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),94,3.4015985621,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),74,3.5397217075,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),94,3.3338749342,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),116,3.0246531971,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),116,3.1905910599,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),69,3.44904325,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),123,3.103254697,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),136,2.6947030618,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),144,2.6318006267,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),44,3.8441111156,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),57,3.5686936823,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),50,3.7958519579,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),125,2.9677858454,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),133,2.791965516,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),136,2.876058552,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),38,3.9397668194,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),42,3.7545553697,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),33,4.0851107568,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),18,5.0347323245,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),16,4.968896522,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),13,5.2684617217,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),52,3.7348207718,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),51,3.6382460286,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),48,3.8114755647,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),92,3.3409144163,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),99,3.2046318532,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),111,3.2114474373,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),120,3.0352559072,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),129,2.857480574,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),125,3.0511661604,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),128,2.9054248838,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),118,2.9956197032,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),100,3.3156353024,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),75,3.4998843787,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),62,3.5034070464,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),70,3.587083649,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),113,3.116580248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),123,2.9440782111,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),101,3.3063923336,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),124,2.9687354797,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),114,3.0608679506,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),114,3.1910676197,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),35,3.9800519659,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),38,3.8107955738,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),32,4.0899955432,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),145,2.5030988,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),70,3.5143920818,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),71,3.4316096918,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),69,3.5919186615,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),84,3.4323214574,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),78,3.3882655062,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),83,3.4492470782,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),115,3.0887479767,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),125,2.9004426989,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),124,3.0595562985,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),141,2.5720367969,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),126,2.878520493,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),139,2.8485283912,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),62,3.5973697723,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),73,3.4178385553,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),64,3.6595691963,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),98,3.2539964693,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),121,2.9704629533,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),121,3.1236704557,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),27,4.4316800665,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),26,4.4889586371,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),27,4.4531130263,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),68,3.5295891591,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),76,3.3999708766,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),68,3.5945393211,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),77,3.4886567382,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),68,3.4536837161,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),73,3.5541852502,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),122,2.9954324057,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),111,3.0731683,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),113,3.1997008937,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),8,5.7543029012,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),8,5.5258136589,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),6,5.7146591291,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),9,5.4588854757,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),12,5.231870273,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),12,5.4376241351,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),130,2.8600424145,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),127,2.8650836231,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),132,2.9472284744,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),24,4.7280058185,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),23,4.5397307782,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),21,4.81043023,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),46,3.8152416729,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),52,3.6219960134,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),57,3.7195437573,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),96,3.3028461207,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),91,3.2695224966,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),97,3.3553199122,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),48,3.7938459501,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),39,3.810025705,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),39,3.9931840997,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),85,3.4322159332,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),93,3.2592213639,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),89,3.4307938065,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),63,3.5832491071,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),47,3.6548638316,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),43,3.891487418,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),58,3.6455703678,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),74,3.4106324166,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),75,3.5222901005,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),21,4.8421900443,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),21,4.5850842827,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),19,5.049916033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),36,3.9777747898,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),36,3.8634791688,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),35,4.0373070826,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),116,3.085609778,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),110,3.0899336897,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),105,3.2690410407,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),26,4.5361507727,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),27,4.4709497504,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),26,4.530575261,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),91,3.3444458002,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),94,3.2436519914,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),98,3.3412743586,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),83,3.432610523,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),95,3.2353567884,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),84,3.4476210328,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),66,3.5349023186,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),67,3.4642078763,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),76,3.5167674179,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),31,4.1988731679,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),30,4.1002279157,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),34,4.0404788095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),59,3.6363333859,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),66,3.4706440262,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),85,3.4455924454,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),14,5.2476431661,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),14,5.1810220554,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),15,5.2127453605,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),141,2.5913035082,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),134,2.8829517881,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),88,3.3912437949,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),100,3.2039038202,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),80,3.466549555,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),133,2.7854132166,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),135,2.7049036553,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),133,2.9284171495,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),102,3.2269495327,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),113,3.0629525644,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),108,3.2294598756,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),55,3.6680981006,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),65,3.4730828535,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),65,3.6563547364,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),32,4.1479949004,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),32,3.93736603,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),37,4.0207184852,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),1,6.2181151672,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),4,5.8943550752,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),3,5.9948566553,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),127,2.9139200804,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),124,2.9031546885,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),117,3.187446862,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),64,3.4797744754,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),55,3.7618311317,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),129,2.8738705783,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),138,2.6123611408,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),134,2.7867236915,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),146,2.4956314401,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),60,3.6265633912,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),63,3.4995797918,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),59,3.6997720885,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),111,3.1355525132,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),87,3.3193960843,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),132,2.7886712407,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),139,2.6291123038,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),142,2.6613304815,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),81,3.4588383665,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),97,3.2286368935,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),87,3.4326613214,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),51,3.7351804932,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),103,3.2983715336,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),57,3.6465818726,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),48,3.6528967511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),46,3.8693971325,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),13,5.3094074959,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),13,5.1890770467,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),14,5.2363665099,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),114,3.1057369897,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),102,3.1613036401,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),120,3.1347080268,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),108,3.1731751209,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),106,3.129739535,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),122,3.12100432,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),76,3.4919405846,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),84,3.349947651,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),93,3.4022965101,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),64,3.5457344893,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),72,3.4314127594,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),86,3.4336232046,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),10,5.4489218721,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),10,5.3715913253,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),9,5.5569677213,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),117,3.0853029401,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),120,2.9744112999,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),119,3.1455819991,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),78,3.4831662448,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),88,3.3043314999,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),88,3.4325287778,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),139,2.6097499854,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),137,2.6809661428,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),131,2.951414254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),34,4.0123679908,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),33,3.9089696495,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),30,4.1540764422,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),90,3.3603306178,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),80,3.3619135995,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),77,3.5061552723,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),112,3.1229315642,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),115,3.0265373589,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.07,Pillar 7. Business usage (1-7),109,3.2166336012,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),130,3.9196153203,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),123,4.757576,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),37,5.7720476287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),66,5.4782121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),110,5.0511129,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),28,5.8652953299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),21,6.1506118773,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),11,6.350648,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),57,5.3945527895,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),48,5.7654518919,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),45,5.9668626118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),102,4.6621484944,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),68,5.435586438,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),67,5.7738762051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),20,6.0971424923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),17,6.1887856571,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),10,6.385226224,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),13,6.1268630063,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),20,6.1575891523,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),21,6.2280011706,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),33,5.8031593458,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),41,5.8949583644,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),38,6.0299177944,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),142,2.5713035043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),143,3.3085157609,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),148,3.1047083446,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),24,5.9589568222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),19,6.1578168728,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),28,6.1286068846,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),103,4.6579233786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),102,4.9884132385,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),125,4.7521761382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),137,3.4682456418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),135,4.1243435753,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),142,4.2107790347,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),122,4.2869575057,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),123,4.4862769161,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),138,4.3641474382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),60,5.3648446664,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),82,5.2956163171,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),79,5.5577696239,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),21,6.0742074725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),15,6.2311069931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),12,6.3454210038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),85,5.042738,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),63,5.55421435,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),44,5.972695,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),98,4.728797,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),123,4.1966635336,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),140,3.9262215225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),145,3.7790559781,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),55,5.452521055,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),47,5.7664686582,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),37,6.0319669539,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),42,5.7401010539,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),26,6.051868567,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),25,6.1544732146,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),45,5.7277758965,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),22,6.1169533148,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),19,6.2524937795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),106,5.085685,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),109,4.5338577706,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),103,4.9587860392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),88,5.4278866826,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),5,6.2765745766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),10,6.3282061622,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),13,6.3376359826,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),10,6.1963925086,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),14,6.2366947302,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),24,6.1875495933,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),29,5.8318083887,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),31,6.0049415961,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),26,6.140281575,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),89,4.9458839566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),108,4.8687056653,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),126,4.7289564524,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),93,4.8447240878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),84,5.2702300536,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),78,5.560589622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),128,3.9942838792,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),119,4.7203703345,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),121,4.8258359301,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),75,5.1459800111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),75,5.3679918678,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),80,5.5548728939,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),94,4.8443901873,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),94,5.1665712058,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),97,5.2554974489,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),50,5.5766410851,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),43,5.8188061383,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),36,6.0395901088,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),65,5.2479741448,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),49,5.7289935545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),41,5.9931461542,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),36,5.7919859429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),35,5.970870212,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),43,5.9793287883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),40,5.7513672515,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),46,5.7696568959,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),56,5.8670067926,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),2,6.5751760485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),29,6.0335566932,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),46,5.9274907475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),63,5.3058599763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),58,5.6310356069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),51,5.9014407095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),86,5.0308693217,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),88,5.2386749292,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),104,5.1073175408,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),101,4.6966450878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),113,4.822172,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),103,5.1181937206,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),56,5.4372105799,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),38,5.9195961541,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),50,5.9110036692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),58,5.3940280125,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),59,5.6177173402,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),47,5.92375348,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),17,6.118162525,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),7,6.3635420006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),8,6.4107855904,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),139,3.1949440208,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),142,3.3714795875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),144,3.9359926861,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),14,6.1259887162,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),8,6.3486336174,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),6,6.4342340789,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),26,5.9140902295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),24,6.0722439824,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),54,5.8697066641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),121,4.659252,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),133,4.5628894505,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),3,6.5383196154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),2,6.5939632538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),2,6.632549,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),54,5.4716660665,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),60,5.610232,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),66,5.7779071349,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),112,4.4871234751,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),100,5.0884385951,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),99,5.2387109819,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),124,4.471519,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),143,4.1745562069,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),83,5.0511142099,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),97,5.1382143399,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),101,5.177724289,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),84,5.0498358375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),87,5.2411882339,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),90,5.40012565,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),61,5.3465814813,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),78,5.3476073342,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),74,5.5747597604,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),87,5.0209777765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),50,5.7265433884,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),60,5.8420770133,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),7,6.2344773355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),12,6.2468862625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),16,6.2944524093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),70,5.2079855525,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),93,5.1674175959,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),98,5.251913773,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),80,5.08689055,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),90,5.2281440755,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),71,5.6153128936,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),99,4.719366,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),111,4.843212615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),119,4.9090154924,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),81,5.056424213,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),77,5.3601376052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),76,5.5727235136,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),48,5.67335145,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),51,5.7123698862,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),48,5.9214949886,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),90,4.9328144003,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),96,5.1402628,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),91,5.3537352493,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),35,5.7951131113,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),32,5.9875826342,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),29,6.1212056974,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),140,3.1340298986,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),144,3.1080739474,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),147,3.3297391377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),1,6.7475745182,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),1,6.6138993948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),1,6.667646006,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),43,5.7375096942,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),34,5.9734025949,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),32,6.0776777,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),51,5.5585238769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),61,5.5656536391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),65,5.7926163733,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),71,5.2074352915,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),55,5.6702381148,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),53,5.8912407985,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),49,5.5938275095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),36,5.9228868095,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),39,6.005371,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),68,5.2306302109,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),74,5.3969864264,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),68,5.7233760602,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),115,4.427101,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),115,4.7736490978,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),96,5.278585469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),69,5.2230339805,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),89,5.2313767593,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),81,5.5069976264,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),104,4.6314410865,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),104,4.94221825,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),117,4.9461032125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),108,4.5804080911,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),107,4.8900266192,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),108,5.0642346324,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),32,5.8076759833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),33,5.9766874667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),57,5.8661973006,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),59,5.3759454981,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),54,5.6817441908,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),35,6.039871373,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),118,4.937764,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),38,5.7619248019,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),62,5.5562793023,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),70,5.6655895896,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),109,4.862603,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),127,4.6374363459,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),117,4.745131,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),115,4.9714787333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),107,4.5946232483,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),112,4.841955,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),114,5.0029463146,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),125,4.139610652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),131,4.3392459786,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),137,4.3703653667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),30,5.8168888048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),28,6.0461570326,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),20,6.2290055439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),22,6.0134340048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),23,6.109942225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),30,6.1123039618,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),64,5.2519739631,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),67,5.4622455664,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),55,5.8690229333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),44,5.735769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),45,5.7717187328,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),87,5.4384491869,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),96,4.7756017254,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),83,5.2803992273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),82,5.5046115436,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),91,4.8578868769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),91,5.2021011742,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),102,5.1664700241,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),78,5.1334863661,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),79,5.3361932918,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),86,5.4428178729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),47,5.6824614351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),42,5.8388295314,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),23,6.1913004924,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),135,3.6367767119,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),129,4.3497005727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),130,4.6076647735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),18,6.1049102889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),4,6.4267444545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),7,6.42853462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),132,4.582624,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),39,5.7557794809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),40,5.9017860792,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),31,6.1012690494,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),100,4.6983137636,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),85,5.268854774,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),75,5.573090986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),132,3.8038557661,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),137,4.0785175103,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),139,4.3566340388,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),133,3.7066162565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),127,4.4039824856,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),124,4.7521957353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),74,5.1679229369,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),76,5.3608520823,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),69,5.6666722167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),111,4.5200555333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),120,4.682041264,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),129,4.6126674448,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),25,5.9268421594,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),30,6.0274269325,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),42,5.9927593676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),105,4.6039030769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),105,4.9398579662,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),85,5.4716254807,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),66,5.2461253599,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),80,5.3123321224,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),72,5.6078182901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),114,4.4491109426,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),125,4.40888715,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),131,4.5898173541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),9,6.1965738984,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),3,6.4455422083,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),4,6.5716496059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),6,6.2365762118,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),6,6.384502227,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),3,6.5752634049,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),127,4.050453425,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),126,4.4080404615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),134,4.5296941,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),12,6.151434084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),13,6.2441022651,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),18,6.2536908891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),72,5.2072129549,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),81,5.3083849784,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),95,5.293087,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),95,4.8278626385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),114,4.799769625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),116,4.95450795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),27,5.8840753209,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),25,6.0586040487,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),27,6.130440081,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),79,5.0909017943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),98,5.1146071205,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),100,5.2193368549,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),41,5.7479046057,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),27,6.0462713333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),22,6.1953929868,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),119,4.3899155094,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),118,4.7345231059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),109,5.0554787556,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),8,6.2255467291,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),9,6.3393878269,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),15,6.3019428766,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),34,5.8011566038,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),39,5.9048560892,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),52,5.9012080047,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),113,4.4710220667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),106,4.9134568943,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),92,5.3324985797,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),15,6.124413,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),11,6.2692609697,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),17,6.2938556659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),76,5.1445562866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),73,5.4088419823,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),84,5.4829337015,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),97,4.7628994,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),99,5.1054150021,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),89,5.4042361636,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),118,4.3908324151,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),128,4.391189,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),120,4.8984758496,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),77,5.138024,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),64,5.5432857846,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),33,6.0712382872,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),92,4.8463941408,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),70,5.432780863,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),73,5.6030655167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),16,6.1234729759,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),18,6.186644103,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),14,6.3279571768,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),139,3.949641,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),135,4.51211225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),62,5.3460274857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),57,5.6404678258,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),111,5.0327912846,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),121,4.3149156311,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),134,4.2294266,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),112,5.0237580462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),106,4.598507,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),110,4.8542012592,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),107,5.0833913931,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),53,5.5479988,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),53,5.695989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),58,5.864634178,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),67,5.244388,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),69,5.4332676863,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),64,5.8054515038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),4,6.4300330014,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),5,6.4059491321,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),5,6.5434399197,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),120,4.3609724158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),101,5.0572087275,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),122,4.8076531843,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),52,5.696931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),94,5.2987706571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),134,3.6745363878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),141,2.9786096683,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),141,3.4607490826,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),146,3.3835682551,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),88,5.0027385456,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),72,5.4108492923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),49,5.9142024261,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),136,3.6128571246,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),132,4.2648646288,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),124,4.1637411934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),136,4.1049070091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),140,4.3534834899,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),52,5.5527810762,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),65,5.5156147401,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),63,5.8148214774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),19,6.1045933761,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),40,6.0002375371,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),73,5.1833749422,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),71,5.4218864598,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),61,5.8404167771,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),23,6.0110729767,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),37,5.9200888812,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),34,6.0505416199,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),131,3.8344099393,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),133,4.2437765895,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),136,4.3785619194,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),129,3.9346988879,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),130,4.3414947576,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),141,4.2479026656,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),116,4.41546325,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),92,5.1813165324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),93,5.3189008899,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),31,5.8121273783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),56,5.6641847755,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),62,5.8278726145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),11,6.1699131384,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),16,6.2124954916,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),9,6.3878144196,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),46,5.705124012,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),44,5.7745359643,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),59,5.8424319194,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),110,4.53115104,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),116,4.7474443,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),105,5.1011174488,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),138,3.369115,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),138,3.9990054952,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),128,4.634782664,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),82,5.0523292,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),86,5.2539100971,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),83,5.502698963,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),117,4.4143791229,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),95,5.1537193714,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),77,5.5658939017,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),126,4.0981948667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),122,4.5649438667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ346,6.07 Use of virtual social networks (1-7),113,5.0063094446,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AGO,Angola,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,AGO,Angola,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,86,1.48,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,120,1.4961,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ALB,Albania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,78,8.807526645,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ALB,Albania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,71,18.786,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,49,21.7131225697,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,72,3.46,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,37,44.846,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ARG,Argentina,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,72,11.713605845,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ARG,Argentina,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,56,6.14,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,69,20.862,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ARM,Armenia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,45,25.8654824988,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ARM,Armenia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,69,3.71,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,55,29.094,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,AUS,Australia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,10,72.9505242299,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,AUS,Australia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,6,53.12,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,7,96.215,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,AUT,Austria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,23,42.5510217059,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,AUT,Austria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,20,24.93,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,23,56.312,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,50,21.5019885509,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,95,0.63,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,46,34.843,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BDI,Burundi,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BDI,Burundi,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,138,0.0049241,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BEL,Belgium,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,56,19.3538419365,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BEL,Belgium,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,48,8.03,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,51,33.013,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BEN,Benin,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BEN,Benin,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,129,0.36579,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,139,0.0038821,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,124,0.018893155,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,127,0.47482,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,42,29.9234300748,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,68,3.76,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,34,48.524,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,75,9.5490485707,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,18,27.09,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,8,91.248,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,77,9.225878598,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,83,12.248,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BLZ,Belize,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BLZ,Belize,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,98,2.8115281874,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,77,2.68,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,98,6.6129,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BRA,Brazil,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,53,20.9068684107,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BRA,Brazil,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,55,6.31,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,49,33.669,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BRB,Barbados,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,7,77.0732864835,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BRB,Barbados,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,44,36.014,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,83,6.3320014386,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,13,33.61,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,94,7.6153,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,115,2.5189,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,BWA,Botswana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,71,11.7662642842,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,BWA,Botswana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,39,10.4,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,14,74.942,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CAN,Canada,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,30,38.39570759,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CAN,Canada,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,16,30.36,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,39,42.125,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,34,35.6268299555,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,15,31.01,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,42,39.563,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CHL,Chile,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,59,17.9636903736,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CHL,Chile,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,45,9.03,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,58,27.961,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CHN,China,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,76,9.4630662966,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CHN,China,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,82,1.79,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CHN,China,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,76,16.906,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0,2011,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,106,0.15,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,137,0.015798,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,COL,Colombia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,90,3.6821795497,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,COL,Colombia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,70,3.67,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,103,5.0253,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,96,2.9964941019,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,66,23.034,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,101,2.0099120399,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,70,20.336,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,41,30.7718142444,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,57,5.9,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,47,34.081,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,21,43.3745292636,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,67,3.84,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,29,52.078,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,DEU,Germany,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,36,34.809062313,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,DEU,Germany,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,32,15.39,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,40,40.765,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,DNK,Denmark,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,6,80.2447836681,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,DNK,Denmark,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,10,46.42,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,6,97.157,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,81,7.7082840892,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,60,5.12,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,78,15.565,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,DZA,Algeria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,DZA,Algeria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,73,10.317068905,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,47,8.25,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,68,21.625,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,EGY,Egypt,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,46,24.0473767025,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,EGY,Egypt,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,91,0.72,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,59,27.929,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ESP,Spain,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,25,41.5753818839,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ESP,Spain,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,23,18.57,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,25,53.606,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,EST,Estonia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,24,41.9657197078,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,EST,Estonia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,19,25.9,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,13,76.905,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,114,0.2832384378,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.02,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,107,4.4485,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,FIN,Finland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,5,87.1030703261,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,FIN,Finland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,4,60.7,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,3,106.62,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,FRA,France,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,33,36.6235743344,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,FRA,France,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,25,18.08,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,FRA,France,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,31,51.77,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GAB,Gabon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GAB,Gabon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,17,52.5558317195,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,11,38.19,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,15,72.058,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GEO,Georgia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,52,21.2766335892,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GEO,Georgia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,38,11.28,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,91,8.5492,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GHA,Ghana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,47,23.0224239416,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GHA,Ghana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,96,0.57,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,48,33.924,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GIN,Guinea,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GIN,Guinea,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.5067273689,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,91,0.72,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,121,1.3578,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GRC,Greece,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,28,39.9162039155,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GRC,Greece,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,61,4.89,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,35,45.694,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,89,4.0657799833,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,75,3.04,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,106,4.5466,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,GUY,Guyana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,GUY,Guyana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,133,0.098319,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,15,55.2435228112,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,17,29.43,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,11,83.178,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,HND,Honduras,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,91,3.6751966907,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,HND,Honduras,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,65,4.17,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,90,8.5602,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,HRV,Croatia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,35,34.8708241953,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,HRV,Croatia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,30,15.53,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,24,53.901,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,HTI,Haiti,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,HTI,Haiti,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0,2011,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,HUN,Hungary,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,70,11.921253977,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,HUN,Hungary,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,41,10.06,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,64,24.181,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,48,22.1959060725,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,85,1.53,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,54,31.592,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,IND,India,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,102,1.8526096617,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,IND,India,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,107,0.11,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,IND,India,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,104,4.9891,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,IRL,Ireland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,13,59.3872423053,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,IRL,Ireland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,12,35.4,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,18,65.87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,122,1.339,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ISL,Iceland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,14,56.9850107595,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ISL,Iceland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,33,12.66,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,16,70.916,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ISR,Israel,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,26,40.5760947154,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ISR,Israel,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,5,55.76,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,26,52.983,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ITA,Italy,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,38,33.2693444607,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ITA,Italy,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,27,16.82,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,28,52.161,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,104,1.526566066,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,78,2.42,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,119,1.571,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,JOR,Jordan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,84,4.9320800124,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,JOR,Jordan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,102,0.33,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,85,11.339,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,JPN,Japan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,3,101.3094823151,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,JPN,Japan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,3,64.63,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,2,115.09,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,29,38.4099217918,,,, +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.02,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,38,42.534,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,KEN,Kenya,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,116,0.2656590305,,,, +2012,KEN,Kenya,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,89,0.86,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,116,2.224,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.02,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,134,0.041806,2010,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,100,2.2369514602,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,90,0.74,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,97,6.7274,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,2,105.0522528379,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,1,78.04,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,4,105.14,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,58,5.88,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,117,2.0637,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,123,0.0234774575,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,56,28.25,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LBR,Liberia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,125,0.005546712,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LBR,Liberia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,135,0.027897,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LBY,Libya,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LBY,Libya,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,99,2.3045422671,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,81,1.85,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,93,7.7528,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,103,1.7301473114,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,98,0.52,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,95,7.4585,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,61,17.2336590898,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,35,12.02,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,73,18.751,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,12,66.6688633003,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,26,17.59,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,12,80.593,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,LVA,Latvia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,32,37.5581661794,,,, +2012,LVA,Latvia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,29,15.85,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,22,58.24,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MAR,Morocco,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,80,8.026945394,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MAR,Morocco,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,76,2.83,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,86,10.09,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MDA,Moldova,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,93,3.5209531311,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MDA,Moldova,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,74,3.16,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,102,5.1161,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,122,0.0516065228,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,110,0.07,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,130,0.32473,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MEX,Mexico,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,82,6.5194469773,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MEX,Mexico,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,87,1.47,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,87,9.8315,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,57,18.0865965435,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,54,6.51,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,63,25.103,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MLI,Mali,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,115,0.269142951,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MLI,Mali,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,124,0.72997,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MLT,Malta,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,39,32.6388340453,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MLT,Malta,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,37,11.66,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,45,35.311,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,136,0.026516,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,63,15.3316431031,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,22,21.99,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,60,27.533,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,60,17.3121522909,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,79,2.34,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,75,18.368,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,109,1.0447264965,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,101,0.36,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,118,1.7839,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,85,4.9114509507,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,117,0.01,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,110,3.6436,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,68,12.4513907544,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,49,7.92,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,67,22.944,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MWI,Malawi,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,95,3.0796921478,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MWI,Malawi,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,104,0.21,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,112,3.4584,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,69,12.2633532501,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,40,10.37,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,82,13.388,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NAM,Namibia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,54,20.9059881136,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NAM,Namibia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,46,8.78,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,50,33.249,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,74,9.9927028705,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,88,1.03,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,74,18.438,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,111,0.8297984671,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,82,1.79,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,123,1.0131,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,19,49.1876683869,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,50,7.48,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,21,61.314,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NOR,Norway,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,8,76.5142396273,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NOR,Norway,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,7,52.53,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,10,84.848,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NPL,Nepal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,121,0.0634192368,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NPL,Nepal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.02,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,65,23.788,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,16,53.0523326603,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,24,18.32,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,17,65.944,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,OMN,Oman,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,31,37.8144472611,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,OMN,Oman,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,28,16.67,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,32,50.942,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,118,0.183936932,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,125,0.6555,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PAN,Panama,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,66,14.5111496604,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PAN,Panama,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,84,1.55,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,80,14.311,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PER,Peru,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,106,1.382665069,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PER,Peru,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,62,4.51,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,114,2.86,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PHL,Philippines,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,94,3.3631330821,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PHL,Philippines,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,80,2.26,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,108,3.8294,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,POL,Poland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,18,49.6474772715,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,POL,Poland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,14,31.28,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,19,63.512,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,65,14.7017001083,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,64,4.22,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,81,13.722,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PRT,Portugal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,44,27.3580186765,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PRT,Portugal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,21,24.09,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,52,32.763,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,88,4.3895443106,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,63,4.29,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,99,5.9823,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,QAT,Qatar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,11,70.3359979808,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,QAT,Qatar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,43,9.55,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,20,61.79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ROU,Romania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,67,14.0881240147,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ROU,Romania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,44,9.42,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,61,27.039,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,20,47.8835133171,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,73,3.37,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,27,52.848,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,110,1.031358089,,,, +2012,RWA,Rwanda,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,100,0.46,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,113,3.2159,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,27,40.3708268422,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,36,11.69,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,36,45.376,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SEN,Senegal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,105,1.4753254264,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SEN,Senegal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,99,0.5,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,111,3.5819,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SGP,Singapore,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,1,114.0608408011,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SGP,Singapore,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,9,48.36,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,1,126.07,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,92,3.5808963835,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,71,3.6,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,100,5.4943,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SRB,Serbia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,37,34.477174349,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SRB,Serbia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,66,4.14,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,30,52.051,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SUR,Suriname,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,,,, +2012,SUR,Suriname,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,79,14.966,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,40,31.9182191654,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,52,7.19,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,41,39.707,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,43,29.2726529377,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,31,15.47,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,43,36.954,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SWE,Sweden,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,4,91.5499589174,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SWE,Sweden,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,2,71.72,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,5,104.89,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,112,0.6648217862,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,84,11.901,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,86,4.7065458857,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,20/01/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,89,8.6085,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,SYR,Syria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,SYR,Syria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,109,0.09,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TCD,Chad,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TCD,Chad,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,THA,Thailand,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,119,0.1395310935,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,THA,Thailand,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,93,0.67,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,132,0.14973,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,94,0.64,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,105,0.2,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,128,0.40391,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,108,1.1538604375,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,92,8.4304,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,112,0.04,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,88,8.9234,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TUR,Turkey,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,79,8.7653943675,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TUR,Turkey,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,53,7.09,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,77,16.45,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,22,42.6840274172,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,34,12.36,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,33,49.927,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,107,1.2397636738,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,107,0.11,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,109,3.705,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,UGA,Uganda,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,97,2.8325775688,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,UGA,Uganda,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,117,0.01,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,96,7.4113,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,87,4.4257402825,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,96,0.57,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,101,5.427,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,URY,Uruguay,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,51,21.4814284463,,,, +2012,URY,Uruguay,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,42,9.7,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,URY,Uruguay,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,53,32.458,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,USA,United States,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,9,74.5052356006,,,, +2012,USA,United States,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,8,50.56,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,USA,United States,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,9,88.236,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,62,16.0657387358,,,, +2012,VEN,Venezuela,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,51,7.45,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,VEN,Venezuela,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,105,4.8302,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,58,18.0365254994,,,, +2012,VNM,Vietnam,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,103,0.27,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,VNM,Vietnam,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,72,18.766,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,YEM,Yemen,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,120,0.0846778291,,,, +2012,YEM,Yemen,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,YEM,Yemen,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,131,0.20169,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,55,19.8176860085,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,59,5.78,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,62,25.198,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,117,0.2107019398,,,, +2012,ZMB,Zambia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ZMB,Zambia,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0.64746,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,64,14.8968456165,,,, +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,111,0.05,2010,,Informa Telecoms & Media,20/01/2012 +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBBBSUBPC,6.06 Mobile broadband subscriptions/100 pop.,57,28.137,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,120,0.1048112998,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,AGO,Angola,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,124,0.15033,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,79,3.2930601657,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ALB,Albania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,83,3.9856181055,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,78,5.06,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,49,10.4745802875,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,52,10.9869009003,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,61,10.339,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,53,9.5573544104,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ARG,Argentina,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,54,10.5336593714,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,56,10.893,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,86,2.754690059,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ARM,Armenia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,76,4.9824271443,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,74,6.7496,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,24,24.1822666611,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,AUS,Australia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,25,24.3212650668,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,25,24.342,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,25,23.8513808782,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,AUT,Austria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,21,25.4236411813,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,23,25.024,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,72,5.0066485027,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,53,10.7278372297,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,46,14.144,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0.0023858237,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BDI,Burundi,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0.0041990498,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,145,0.0049444,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,12,31.4891917208,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BEL,Belgium,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,9,32.9527668444,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,10,33.266,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,128,0.0403281758,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BEN,Benin,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,131,0.0428245429,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,134,0.050066,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,121,0.0861815926,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,124,0.0828802951,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,129,0.087047,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,127,0.0403518327,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,112,0.3113087995,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,117,0.38816,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,39,14.5214543471,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,38,16.4475127029,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,38,17.948,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,71,5.3592585401,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,43,13.8269105086,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,49,13.201,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,58,8.177574878,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,59,9.7146015647,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,58,10.61,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,84,2.8607919083,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BLZ,Belize,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,100,0.9661476222,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,108,0.6529371018,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,107,1.0537,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,62,6.8051039857,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BRA,Brazil,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,63,8.5856580295,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,65,9.1548,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,31,20.557492564,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BRB,Barbados,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,29,22.1385415716,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,30,23.092,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,69,5.4394364785,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,72,5.7114633269,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,81,4.8149,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,93,2.2601,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,106,0.5968275164,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,BWA,Botswana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,105,0.7734626525,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,108,0.94006,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,14,29.805280617,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CAN,Canada,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,12,31.8253761671,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,11,32.477,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,2,37.9436108992,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,1,39.9636832955,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,1,39.886,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,50,10.4506404464,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CHL,Chile,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,49,11.5959935204,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,52,12.407,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,54,9.4187496549,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CHN,China,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,48,11.6125724826,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,51,12.721,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,129,0.0400247241,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,117,0.2456867981,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,133,0.05376,2009,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,138,0.00510233,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,138,0.0054916631,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.63276,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,67,5.6033349375,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,COL,Colombia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,70,6.9397304864,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,69,8.1575,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,80,3.2199661693,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,78,4.3369257968,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,86,4.0156,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,64,6.1867995511,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,61,8.6778269677,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,64,9.3244,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,37,17.6193112472,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,37,18.9425774071,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,37,19.227,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,40,14.4954331285,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,39,15.8415946851,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,40,16.399,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,10,31.6999010904,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,DEU,Germany,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,8,33.0878588522,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,9,33.704,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,3,37.6995579573,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,DNK,Denmark,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,3,37.6032059755,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,3,38.777,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,78,3.6267492133,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,82,4.0170716895,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,83,4.336,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,88,2.5374837094,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,DZA,Algeria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,88,2.779306937,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,90,2.8873,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,97,1.3680855216,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,80,4.2200850876,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,77,5.2847,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,91,1.7873332722,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,EGY,Egypt,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,91,2.2056181748,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,91,2.8335,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,26,22.8628046854,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ESP,Spain,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,26,23.7832762296,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,24,24.375,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,20,25.0773968415,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,EST,Estonia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,23,24.773952528,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,20,25.467,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,139,0.0049512028,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,139,0.0054192954,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,143,0.0073826,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,15,28.570917278,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,FIN,Finland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,16,29.5035813972,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,16,30.262,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,7,33.9956596724,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,FRA,France,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,5,36.0375094252,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,4,37.475,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,GAB,Gabon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,114,0.2933006227,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,118,0.30627,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,11,31.5622521079,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,11,32.7440583064,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,8,34.039,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,66,5.8341398139,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GEO,Georgia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,66,7.507185219,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,66,8.6661,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,115,0.2053229068,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GHA,Ghana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,116,0.2509271077,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,120,0.25755,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,GIN,Guinea,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,137,0.0058698031,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,144,0.0061129,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,133,0.0202500124,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,134,0.0246044289,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,136,0.027914,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,32,19.8700699847,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GRC,Greece,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,33,21.6211966412,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,27,24.139,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,90,1.7999949823,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,95,1.7999949823,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,98,1.8149,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,95,1.4835127695,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,GUY,Guyana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,89,2.6484048463,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,89,3.6713,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,13,29.9312693875,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,14,31.5762279199,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,15,31.169,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,99,0.9999310574,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,HND,Honduras,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,110,0.4345114123,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,110,0.77215,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,36,18.2548889136,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,HRV,Croatia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,36,19.5942269017,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,36,20.67,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,142,0,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,HTI,Haiti,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,143,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,147,0,2008,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,33,19.5942263572,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,HUN,Hungary,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,28,22.1559933679,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,31,22.865,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,103,0.7922176916,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,100,1.1292156383,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,103,1.2084,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,101,0.8974253982,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,IND,India,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,102,1.0753190862,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,102,1.2113,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,29,21.0609857044,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,IRL,Ireland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,32,21.9556003555,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,32,22.72,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,104,0.6759165394,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,90,2.3701874416,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,85,4.0251,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,6,34.1142514431,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ISL,Iceland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,7,33.9153918721,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,7,34.261,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,19,25.1388439556,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ISR,Israel,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,22,24.8476698694,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,22,25.34,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,28,21.897955913,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ITA,Italy,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,31,22.0786714056,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,34,22.14,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,76,4.2569422251,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,84,3.8714805837,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,84,4.3211,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,81,3.1643254725,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,JOR,Jordan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,87,3.1577040044,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,92,2.8118,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,18,26.9051894513,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,JPN,Japan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,17,27.6036233865,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,19,27.734,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,55,8.9028286947,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,68,7.3635985006,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,62,9.7848,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,136,0.0102560477,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,KEN,Kenya,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,123,0.1019857664,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,128,0.099428,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,112,0.2887018409,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,107,0.6853862159,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,109,0.87892,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,114,0.2522659267,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,120,0.1537904129,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,121,0.20003,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,4,35.6834601594,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,4,36.9053675572,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,5,37.247,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,92,1.6808368521,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,98,1.6808368521,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,101,1.4459,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,125,0.11356,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,73,4.730819896,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,74,5.1650406571,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,63,9.705,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,LBR,Liberia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,141,0.0015259513,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,146,0.0023864,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,LBY,Libya,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,101,1.0898720988,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,106,1.0935,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,98,1.0945184957,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,97,1.705836441,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,99,1.6779,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,134,0.0184219907,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,128,0.0610344496,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,131,0.070727,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,30,20.5817407633,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,30,22.1316464101,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,35,21.149,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,8,33.1793602497,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,10,32.9016302252,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,12,32.401,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,34,19.3101427138,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,LVA,Latvia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,35,20.3920215483,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,29,23.35,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,94,1.5607510554,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MAR,Morocco,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,94,1.8250223856,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,97,2.0958,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,60,7.5308049377,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MDA,Moldova,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,58,10.01728134,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,53,11.871,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,131,0.0258716174,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,133,0.0321461722,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,135,0.038876,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,51,9.9847626206,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MEX,Mexico,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,57,10.2125575385,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,59,10.523,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,44,12.469553224,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,47,12.5597596387,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,48,13.697,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,135,0.0150554896,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MLI,Mali,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,135,0.0149436177,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,138,0.021517,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,16,27.986747176,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MLT,Malta,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,15,30.9485347788,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,14,32.031,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,139,0.010228,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,56,8.2978352785,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,64,8.2978352785,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,67,8.4369,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,87,2.6019221328,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,86,3.1740850551,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,88,3.75,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,125,0.0625588774,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0.0679908004,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,130,0.081275,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,117,0.1914576477,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,119,0.1728061804,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,122,0.17642,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,65,6.0982687435,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,60,8.9392794849,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,54,11.214,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,130,0.0343604767,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MWI,Malawi,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,127,0.063715437,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,142,0.0075252,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,61,7.318399901,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,67,7.4423526067,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,68,8.4128,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,108,0.4221979784,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NAM,Namibia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,104,0.7959969088,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,105,1.1772,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,124,0.0625590262,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,121,0.132746982,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,140,0.0084574,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,102,0.8223679948,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,99,1.4496429982,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,100,1.6489,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,1,38.1027181865,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,2,38.7404644511,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,2,39.811,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,5,35.2987675275,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NOR,Norway,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,6,35.444890888,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,6,36.327,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,116,0.1950475317,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NPL,Nepal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.3104921183,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,116,0.48375,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,22,24.9305424556,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,19,25.8239364786,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,18,27.804,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,93,1.633425399,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,OMN,Oman,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,93,1.846778713,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,95,2.1489,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,111,0.3063405936,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,111,0.4174242443,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,115,0.51737,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,59,7.8377340893,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PAN,Panama,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,65,7.9201441538,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,72,7.8304,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,82,3.135296971,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PER,Peru,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,81,4.0487939092,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,82,4.7445,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,89,1.8468638881,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PHL,Philippines,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,92,1.888204185,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,94,2.2197,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,42,12.9596678498,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,POL,Poland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,42,14.6802122429,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,42,15.538,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,38,14.7110876501,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,41,14.8992157577,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,43,15.512,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,35,19.2301639669,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PRT,Portugal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,34,20.9517736902,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,33,22.545,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,107,0.4360801097,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,103,0.9213509148,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,104,1.1912,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,57,8.1906739451,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,QAT,Qatar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,62,8.6686869432,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,60,10.504,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,41,13.869256935,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ROU,Romania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,40,15.2077100291,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,41,16.171,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,46,10.9822339352,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,46,13.1445479384,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,45,14.461,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,132,0.0248493859,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,132,0.0333639467,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,137,0.023704,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,68,5.4525004039,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,73,5.615503241,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,73,6.9491,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,105,0.6325295197,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SEN,Senegal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,106,0.7261609035,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,112,0.6962,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,21,24.9448629664,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SGP,Singapore,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,20,25.6344867985,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,21,25.441,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,143,0,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,147,0,2007,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,85,2.8301985809,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,85,3.3079132511,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,87,3.8444,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,45,11.1817573836,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SRB,Serbia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,51,11.2886951966,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,50,12.922,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,83,2.9872139922,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SUR,Suriname,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,77,4.5659487098,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,76,5.4754,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,43,12.7132711682,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,44,13.6475688029,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,44,14.661,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,23,24.2459402467,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,24,24.3428048582,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,26,24.277,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,9,31.8454976163,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SWE,Sweden,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,13,31.7665540661,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,13,32.276,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,119,0.1370930209,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,118,0.2308593653,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,119,0.27856,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2010 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,55,10.3592352582,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,55,11.034,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,110,0.3310239784,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,SYR,Syria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,141,0.0013360401,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TCD,Chad,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,142,0.0014489615,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,123,0.15628,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,74,4.6130135204,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,THA,Thailand,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,75,5.0288732267,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,70,8.1515,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,123,0.0683274899,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,125,0.0719511283,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0.0444699405,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,130,0.0476671688,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,132,0.053855,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,48,10.811165405,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,50,11.5116425892,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,47,13.754,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,75,4.5970139684,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,80,4.8544,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,52,9.7313618499,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TUR,Turkey,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,56,10.259052752,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,57,10.62,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,27,22.6782067515,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,27,23.7116610622,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,28,23.879,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,137,0.0070247856,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,136,0.0075727275,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,141,0.0081619,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,118,0.163962662,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,UGA,Uganda,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,122,0.1029116724,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,126,0.10565,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,63,6.5009122778,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,69,7.0111338348,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,71,8.0023,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,47,10.9083806451,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,URY,Uruguay,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,45,13.4673349886,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,39,16.585,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,17,27.6184240688,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,USA,United States,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,18,27.3503668552,,,, +2014,USA,United States,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,17,28.348,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,70,5.3709202223,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,71,6.1673462731,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,75,6.7213,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,77,4.133705497,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,79,4.3226936806,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,79,4.8974,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,109,0.3492358429,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,YEM,Yemen,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,109,0.4395182557,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,111,0.7014,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,96,1.4820631364,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,96,1.797464121,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,96,2.1135,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,122,0.0784424884,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,129,0.056586443,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,127,0.10511,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,113,0.262499469,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2010 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,115,0.2665751321,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,BBSUBPC,6.05 Fixed broadband Internet subscriptions/100 pop.,114,0.52057,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",101,5.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",115,7.1702,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",86,11.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",85,13.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",87,20.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",32,65,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",31,67,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",32,72,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",71,21.32,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",66,34,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",58,47.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",79,15,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",86,13.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",81,25.398,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",18,74.07,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",17,78.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",17,81.372,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",21,72.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",24,75.44,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",20,79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",53,35.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",62,35.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",61,46.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",115,2.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",146,0.13,2009,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",22,72.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",21,76.51,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",23,78,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",139,0.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",139,2.3622,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",135,0.24,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",122,2,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",134,2.8003,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",119,2.64,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",117,2.64,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",133,3.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",58,33.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",54,45,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",55,51,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",19,74,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",20,76.7711715698,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",20,79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",77,18.09,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",74,23,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",70,39.699,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",107,3.91,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",95,9.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",107,10,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",64,27.06,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",59,37.84,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",62,45.374,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",45,51,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",48,51,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",44,62.86,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",25,71.31,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",35,65,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",30,72.443,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",102,11.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",117,2.76,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",122,2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",110,9.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",16,78.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",17,78.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",16,83,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",7,86.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",9,85,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",8,90,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",55,35,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",64,35,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",63,45.266,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",67,23.66,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",71,23.66,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",72,37.364,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",128,1.06,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",129,1.06,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",144,1.3482,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",122,1.48,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",126,1.29,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",129,3.5335,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",76,19.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",72,23.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",75,32.139,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",111,3.45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",118,2.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",97,13.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",66,24.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",68,33.58,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",59,47.325,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",43,53.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",45,57.35,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",45,62,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",35,60.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",33,66.63,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",33,71,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",10,82.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",13,83.25,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",15,85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",8,86.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",7,90.08,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",6,92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",98,7.55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",89,11.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",99,13.65,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",91,10,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",92,10,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",91,19.36,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",87,11.54,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",81,16.86,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",84,22.494,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",60,31.15,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",70,30.5,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",74,32.274,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",38,59.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",36,63.88,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",37,68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",29,67.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",29,70.78,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",26,75,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",134,0.25,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",140,0.06,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",141,1.8916,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",13,80.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",11,84.16,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",13,87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",20,73.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",23,75.92,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",19,80,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",103,6.02,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",113,7.8745,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",14,79.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",8,85.09,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",9,88.611,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",78,16.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",82,16.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",76,31.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",131,0.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",135,0.27,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",105,11,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",130,1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",145,1.2741,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",113,3.17,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",122,2,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",116,6.6623,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",48,46.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",49,50.17,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",51,54,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",114,3.02,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",120,2.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",109,9.2991,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",102,5.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",102,6.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",85,20.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",17,76.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",22,76.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",22,78.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",99,6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",101,6.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",100,13.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",40,56.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",41,61.41,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",39,66,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",118,2.68,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",116,2.68,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",131,3.3545,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",35,60.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",34,65.18,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",35,69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",109,3.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",100,7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",117,6.45,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",104,4.24,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",108,4.24,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",108,9.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",23,71.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",19,78.12,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",18,81,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",73,20.78,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",76,20.78,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",78,26.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",2,92,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",3,92.59,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",2,95,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",27,69,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",28,71,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",29,73.434,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",39,59,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",40,61.57,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",43,63,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",84,11.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",84,13.97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",82,23,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",70,22.05,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",61,35.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",64,43.598,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",12,81.29,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",15,81.29,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",14,85.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",68,23.19,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",55,44,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",53,52.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",105,4.04,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",119,2.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",103,11.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",112,3.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",111,3.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",118,6.3243,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",133,0.36,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",136,0.22,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",127,3.9401,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",1,96.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",1,97.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",1,97.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",59,31.61,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",44,57.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",40,65.15,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",121,5.0696,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",61,29.71,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",39,61.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",42,63.979,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",143,1.5483,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",96,9.2,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",98,13.666,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",100,5.89,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",104,5.89,2011,,Research Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) of Executive Yuan; Republic of China, +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",106,10.28,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",124,1.29,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",126,1.29,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",128,3.704,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",34,60.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",38,61.81,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",45,62,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",4,90.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",6,90.62,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",4,93,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",37,59.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",37,63.64,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",35,69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",65,25.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",62,35.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",71,38.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",56,34.66,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",65,34.66,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",65,42,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",127,1.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",134,0.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",136,2.6997,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",69,22.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",73,23.26568,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",79,25.969,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",47,49.18,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",52,46.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",49,56.793,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",125,1.21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",128,1.21,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",137,2.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",26,70.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",25,75.29,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",24,77,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",142,1.79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",72,21.17,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",47,51.4,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",50,54.992,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",97,7.6999867973,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",99,7.6999867973,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",96,14,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",129,1.05,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",133,0.87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",124,4.65,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",123,1.41,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",130,1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",130,3.3995,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",62,29.02,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",60,36.36,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",65,42,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",116,2.87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",114,2.87,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",120,5.546,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",41,55.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",42,61.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",41,64.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",107,3.91,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",93,9.99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",101,12.97,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",93,8.95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",105,4.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",110,9.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",120,2.56,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",125,1.9748808085,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",114,7.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",3,90.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",2,93.64,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",3,94,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",5,89.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",4,92.24,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",4,93,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",125,1.21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",132,0.97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",126,4.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",15,78.97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",16,78.97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",12,87.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",63,27.67,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",58,38.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",68,41.893,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",95,8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",98,8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",112,8.3027,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",84,11.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",77,20.73,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",77,31.55,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",80,14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",83,14,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",89,20.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",89,10.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",91,10.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",92,18.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",33,63.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",32,66.64,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",34,70,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",46,50,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",50,50,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",48,60.722,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",43,53.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",43,57.97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",47,61,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",81,13.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",78,19.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",83,22.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",9,84,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",12,83.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",10,88.057,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",49,42.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",51,47.44,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",51,54,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",50,42.07,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",53,46,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",54,51.235,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",138,0.13,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",112,3.2,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",138,2.41,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",42,54.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",46,54.38,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",38,66.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",103,4.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",106,4.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",119,5.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",11,82,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",10,84.79,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",11,87.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",94,8.04,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",97,8.04,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",95,15,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",52,40.23,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",57,40.23,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",57,47.954,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",83,11.86,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",80,17.46,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",88,20.22,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",30,67.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",29,70.78,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",25,76.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",28,68.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",26,72.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",28,74,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",6,88.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",5,90.64,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",6,92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",110,3.61,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",110,3.61,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",104,11.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",66,34,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",67,41.92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",54,35.15,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",137,0.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",139,0.14,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",140,2.3464,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",88,11.42,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",87,13.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",93,18.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",136,0.21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",137,0.21,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",75,19.78,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",79,18.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",69,39.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",96,7.74,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",85,20.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",51,41.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",56,42.94,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",60,47.198,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",31,67.15,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",14,82.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",31,72.23,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",130,0.74,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",106,4.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",132,3.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",132,0.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",138,0.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",125,4.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",74,20.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",75,22.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",73,36.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",57,33.26,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",69,33.26,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",56,48.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",24,71.62,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",27,71.62,,,, +2014,USA,United States,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",26,75,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",92,9.68,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",90,11,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",89,20.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",82,12.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",88,12.5,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",94,15.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",115,2.93,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",113,2.93,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",123,4.6936,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",89,10.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",94,9.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",80,25.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",121,2.01,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",121,2.01,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",135,2.7996,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",106,3.96,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",109,4.04,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETHOUSEPCT,"6.04 Households w/ Internet access, %",122,4.8558,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",111,7.14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",118,8.52,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",95,15.62,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",95,15.62,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",95,20,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",26,76,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",28,76,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",18,85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",60,40,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",59,47,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",58,56,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",83,21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",87,20,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",79,34,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",18,81.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",18,82.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",17,85.24,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",25,76.18593,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",25,78.07,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",22,81,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",82,21.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",86,21.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",67,45,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",131,2.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",147,0.13,2009,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",22,76.72286,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",23,78.88,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",25,80,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",132,2.48,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",132,2.48,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",131,4.2155,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",134,2.14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",134,2.14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",135,3.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",127,3.08,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",127,3.08,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",130,4.83,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",65,35.07025,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",61,46.78,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",61,52,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",8,87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",7,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",3,92.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",70,33.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",73,33.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",73,39.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",108,8.2,2000,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2000,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",91,17.03,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",79,27,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",88,25.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",66,34.86,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",64,45.41,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",65,49.92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",39,61.39,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",45,61.39,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",41,69.15,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",19,79.57,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",21,79.57,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",14,86.92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",101,16.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",113,6.45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",111,6.45,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",109,12.25,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",12,83.87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",15,83.87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",15,86.63,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",9,86.85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",11,86.85,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",16,85.79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",54,46.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",60,46.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",60,53.69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",64,35.39,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",71,35.39,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",70,40.89,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",136,1.76,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",135,1.76,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",141,2.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",118,5.36,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",117,5.36,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",119,8.28,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",77,26.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",76,29.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",74,38.356,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",104,11.34,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",102,11.34,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",87,26.45,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",57,41.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",65,45.34,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",66,48.962,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",40,60.5316,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",42,63.87,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",39,70,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",37,64.05612,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",36,69.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",34,75.03,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",10,85.74056,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",10,86.86,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",12,87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",7,88.02493,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",6,90.44,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",4,92.18,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",93,16.42,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",89,18.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",96,19.77,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",84,20,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",87,20,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",90,24.23,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",76,27,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",78,28.77,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",82,32.216,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",68,34,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",70,36.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",76,37.917,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",34,68.72412,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",32,71.54,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",36,74,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",32,69.24823,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",34,71.44,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",31,76,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",137,1.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",137,1.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",143,2.11,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",16,81.98556,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",13,85.12,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",10,88,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",24,76.40766,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",24,78.18,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",22,81,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",108,7.64,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",114,10.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",15,82.56711,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",14,84.56,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",12,87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",89,18.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",91,18.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",80,32.65,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",107,9.14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",105,9.14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",107,13.761,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",136,1.45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",144,2.06,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",116,5.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",115,5.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",122,7.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",47,53.38655,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",49,57.24,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",56,57.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",94,15.81,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",94,15.81,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",97,19.15,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",112,6.47,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",110,7.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",92,22.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",20,77.94,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",26,77.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",24,80.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",102,12.91,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",99,12.91,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",104,15.12,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",42,60.00957,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",46,60.00957,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",42,68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",115,5.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",114,5.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",123,7.33,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",35,66.43961,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",37,69.65,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",38,71,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",105,10.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",101,12,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",103,15.14,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",114,6.12,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",112,6.12,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",112,10.87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",23,76.46395,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",20,80.56,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",19,83,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",69,33.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",72,33.72,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",77,37,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",1,93,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",1,94.66,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",2,96,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",21,77,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",22,79,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",21,82.08,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",36,64.84639,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",39,66.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",44,67,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",84,20,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",84,22.69,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",81,32.64,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",50,51.41,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",57,50.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",59,54.6,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",14,83.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",17,83.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,JPN,Japan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",26,79.98,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",78,25.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",63,46,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",49,63,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",124,4.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",122,4.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",113,10.84,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",125,3.98,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",125,3.98,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,False +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",124,6.88,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",122,4.33,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",120,4.33,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",128,5.42,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",17,81.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",19,81.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",20,82.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",62,37.53,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",38,69,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",35,75,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",117,8.68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",72,31.68,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",33,71.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",27,79.68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",141,1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",145,2.01,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",109,7.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",98,17.64,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",103,12.28,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",100,12.28,2011,,Research Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) of Executive Yuan; Republic of China, +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",105,14.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",120,4.98,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",118,4.98,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",126,5.93,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",44,59.22874,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",44,61.83,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",47,64,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",4,90.21483,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",3,91.73,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",5,92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",38,62.7755,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",40,64.31,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",39,70,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",67,34.23,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",67,39,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",69,43.06,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",63,36.91,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",69,36.91,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",68,44.49,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",138,1.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",138,1.37,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",138,2.85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",75,29.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",75,30.04,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",83,32.195,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",41,60.33,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",52,53.58,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",55,58.35,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",128,3.04,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",128,3.04,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",121,7.66,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",28,73.13351,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",27,76.38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",30,78,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",142,2.26,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",71,31.99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",62,46.57,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",63,51.251,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",81,22.2999862584,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",85,22.2999862584,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",84,30.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",110,7.48,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",123,4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",127,5.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",129,2.99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",129,2.99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",134,3.72,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",61,37.71,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",68,38.1978,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",71,40.56,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",121,4.49,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",119,4.49,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",132,4.04,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",58,41.02,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",41,64.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",45,66.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",96,15.43,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",98,13.04,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",106,14.27,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",97,15.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",104,9.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",111,11.38,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",109,8.16,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",106,8.16,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",115,9.9265,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",2,91.97233,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",2,94.16,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",1,97.24,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",3,90.94413,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",5,90.97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",5,92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",123,4.21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",121,4.21,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",120,7.83,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",13,83.85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",16,83.85,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",9,91.18,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",55,45.55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",47,58,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",50,62.66,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",101,13,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",107,8.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",108,12.474,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",86,19.83,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",77,29,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",75,38.29,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",80,22.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",82,23,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",85,29.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",100,13.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",97,13.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",100,16.94,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",33,69.02121,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",35,71.31,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",37,73,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",46,55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",51,55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",54,60,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",43,59.49488,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",43,63.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",46,66,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",87,19.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",83,22.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",89,24.29,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",5,89.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",8,88.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",8,91.512,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",53,47.89282,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",55,51.19,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",57,57,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",52,50,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",50,57.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",52,60.61,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",140,0.48,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",139,1.3,2005,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",140,2.41,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",45,57.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",48,57.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",43,67.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",117,5.69,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",116,5.69,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",116,8.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",11,84,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",12,86.05,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",11,87.69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",142,0.77,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",146,0.77,2005,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",99,13.26,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",96,13.26,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",102,15.25,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",51,50.85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",56,50.85,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",53,60.33,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",74,29.93,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",74,32.29,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2011 (December 2011 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/11/2011 +2014,SUR,Suriname,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",78,34.32,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",29,72.17563,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",30,75.43,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",29,79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",31,70.46241,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",31,74.44,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",31,76,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",6,89.50208,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",4,91.59,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",5,92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",106,10.65,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",103,10.65,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",110,11.85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",66,45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",62,51.94,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",59,40.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",139,0.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",143,0.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",139,2.52,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",79,22.84,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",81,24.6689,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",86,26.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",130,2.87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",130,2.87,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,n/a,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",48,53.08,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",53,53.08,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",51,61.01,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",92,17,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",93,22.84,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",56,44.22655,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",58,48.48,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",64,50.236,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",30,71.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",9,87.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",33,75.18,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",131,2.62,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",123,4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",136,3.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",135,2.12,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",140,1.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",133,4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",73,30.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",80,25.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",72,40.477,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",49,52.79,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",54,52.79,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",48,63.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",27,75.54,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",29,75.54,,,, +2014,USA,United States,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",28,79.31,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",90,17.27,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",92,17.27,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",94,20.23,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",98,14.21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",93,16.03,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",99,17.48,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",126,3.96,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",126,3.96,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",129,5.05,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",88,18.33,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",90,18.33,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",91,23.55,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",133,2.43,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",133,2.43,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",137,3.0545,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",119,5.32,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",113,5.92,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,COMPUTERHOUSEPCT,"6.03 Households w/ personal computer, %",125,6.48,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",115,10,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",109,16.937,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",55,45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",57,49,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",58,54.656,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",18,78,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",34,70,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",14,85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",74,36,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",60,47.704,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",54,55.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",59,44,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",83,32,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",84,39.161,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",19,76,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",18,79,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",18,82.35,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",23,72.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",15,79.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",21,81,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",53,46,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",56,50,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",59,54.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",136,2.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",141,1.11,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",146,1.22,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",20,75,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",19,78,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",19,82,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",131,3.13,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",131,3.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",136,3.7977,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",139,1.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",134,3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",138,3.725,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",130,3.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",126,5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",128,6.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",52,46.23,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",54,51,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",55,55.148,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",41,55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",21,77,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",10,88,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",44,52,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",42,60,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",40,65.356,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",101,14,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",95,20,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",90,30,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",91,34.188,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",64,40.65,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",62,45,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",65,49.848,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",28,70.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",30,71.7657,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",32,73.33,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",48,50,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",47,56,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",48,60.273,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",100,25.434,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",126,6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",124,7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",121,11.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",13,81.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",12,83,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",12,86.766,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",9,83.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",10,85.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",13,85.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",55,45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",50,53.8938,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",45,61.418,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",76,34.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",74,38.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",78,42.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",134,2.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",136,2.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",139,2.379,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",128,4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",126,5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",129,5.699,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",72,36.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",70,40.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",66,48.984,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",82,30,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",83,32,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",89,34.743,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",72,36.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",68,42.12,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",68,47.501,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",43,52.9936597,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",44,57.68,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",47,61,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",31,68.8150116,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",27,72.97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",28,75,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",12,82,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",12,83,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",16,84,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",6,88.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",6,90,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",4,93,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",68,39.53,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",79,35.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",74,45,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",105,12.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",110,14,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",113,15.228,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",84,29,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",88,31.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",88,35.135,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",89,26.74,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",73,38.69,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",75,44.07,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",33,65.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",38,67.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",34,72,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",21,74.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",23,76.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",25,79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",141,0.75,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",142,1.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",144,1.4828,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",7,86.89,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",7,89.37,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",7,91,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",15,80.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",16,79.58,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",17,83,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",123,8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",126,8.6167,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",8,85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",14,82,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",11,87.016,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",88,26.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",76,36.56,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",71,45.503,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",119,9.55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",109,14.11,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",107,17.108,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",140,1.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",143,1.4901,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",120,9.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",117,10.8703,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",120,12.449,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",58,44.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",51,53,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",53,56,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",114,10.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",115,11.7274,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",111,16,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",83,29.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",83,32,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",93,33,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",24,72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",24,74.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",33,72.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",112,11.09,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",105,15.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",105,18.12,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",39,60.32,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",33,70.71,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",44,63,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",121,8.37,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",122,8.37,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",125,9.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",34,65.27,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",43,59,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",34,72,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",118,9.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",101,18,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",112,15.36,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",124,7.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",119,10.07,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",119,12.58,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",30,69.85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",22,76.82,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",25,79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",102,13,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",96,21,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",98,25.998,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",1,95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",1,95.02,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",1,96.21,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",32,67.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",34,70,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",31,73.365,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",42,53.68,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",45,56.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",51,58,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",90,26.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",87,31.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",70,46.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",70,38,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",82,34.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",81,41,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",17,78.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",17,79.53,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",24,79.05,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",78,34,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",62,45,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",61,53.316,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",91,25.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",93,28,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",95,32.095,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",95,20,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",98,20,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",101,21.724,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",140,1.26,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",133,3.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",131,4.9399,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",10,83.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",11,83.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",15,84.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",69,38.25,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",26,74.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",23,79.178,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",123,10.748,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",81,31,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",52,52,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",46,61.25,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",134,3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",137,3.7941,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",104,16.9981,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",115,14,2011,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",109,12,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",107,15,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",104,18.285,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",129,3.86,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",130,4.2248,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",133,4.5896,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",37,62.12,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",39,65.05,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",38,68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",4,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",5,90.89,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",6,92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",26,71.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",31,71.68,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",30,74,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",49,49,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",54,51,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",57,55,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",65,40,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",75,38,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",77,43.37,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",137,1.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",138,1.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",142,2.0549,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",80,31.05,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",78,36.15,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",85,38.42,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",46,51.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",46,56.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",43,63.148,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",133,2.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",137,2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",140,2.1689,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",35,63,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",36,69.22,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",36,70,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",147,1.0691,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",44,52,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",72,40,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",52,56.839,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",104,12.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",98,20,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",110,16.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",127,4.17,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",129,4.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",132,4.8491,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",132,3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",128,4.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",130,5.3691,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",86,28.33,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",81,34.95,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",80,41.395,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",135,2.26,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",132,3.33,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",134,4.3506,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",40,56.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",41,61,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",39,65.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",125,6.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",113,12,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",118,12.941,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",85,28.43,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",92,28.43,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",94,32.876,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",115,10,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",118,10.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",116,13.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",3,90.72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",3,92.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",4,93,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",2,93.39,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",2,93.97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",2,95,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",123,7.93,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",120,9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",122,11.149,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",11,83,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",9,86,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",8,89.511,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",38,62,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",37,68,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",49,60,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",98,16.78,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",120,9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",124,9.9637,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",61,42.75,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",66,42.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",72,45.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",76,34.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",77,36.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",86,38.2,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",92,25,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",91,29,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",87,36.235,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",36,62.32,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",40,64.88,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",41,65,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",54,45.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",59,48,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",63,51.411,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",47,51.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",48,55.3,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",42,64,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",97,19.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",94,23.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",96,27.076,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",13,81.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",8,86.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",9,88.104,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",66,39.93,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",64,44.02,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",64,50,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",60,43,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",57,49,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",62,53.275,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",102,13,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",124,7,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",127,8.0239,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",62,41,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",61,47.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",60,54,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",99,16,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",103,17.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",103,19.204,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",27,71,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",32,71,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",29,74.182,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",144,0.26,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",145,1.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",100,15.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",102,17.68859598,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",99,25.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",63,40.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",67,42.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",67,48.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",79,31.59,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",83,32,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",90,34.681,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",16,79.42,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",25,74.44,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",22,80,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",29,70,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",28,72,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",36,70,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",4,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",4,91,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",3,94,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",122,8.02,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",100,18.13,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",102,20.782,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",65,43.16400446,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",69,47.076,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",94,20.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",137,1.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",138,1.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",141,2.1,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",93,21.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",95,23.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",97,26.5,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",110,11.55,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",111,13.03,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",142,0.21,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",143,0.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",148,0.9147,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",50,48.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",49,55.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",50,59.516,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",71,36.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",79,41.442,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",67,39.82,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",69,42.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",73,45.13,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",25,71.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",28,72,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",27,75.991,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",113,11,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",113,12,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",135,3.95,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",105,12.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",112,13.01354333,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",114,14.69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",55,45,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",89,30.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",92,33.7,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",51,47.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",53,51.4,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",56,55.115,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",22,74,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",20,77.863021,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",20,81.025,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",75,35.67,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",71,40.22,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",76,44.046,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",87,27.56,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",80,35.07,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",83,39.49,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",107,12.35,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",108,14.905,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",106,17.447,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",108,12.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",96,21,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2012 (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",81,41,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",115,10,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",116,11.5,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",117,13.468,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",111,11.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",106,15.7,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NETUSERPCT,"6.02 Individuals using Internet, %",108,17.091,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,126,46.6892416232,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,138,47.074,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,19,141.928961353,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,90,96.3933945027,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,70,110.69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,14,145.4535397494,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,16,148.6188562962,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,20,149.64,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,20,141.7882482337,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,26,134.9211144455,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,19,151.91,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,33,125.0085379642,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,78,103.5663736567,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,65,111.91,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,70,101.0401113974,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,67,108.3353549445,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,84,105.59,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,13,145.8365401249,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,13,154.7832399846,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,11,160.54,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,75,99.0457980995,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,64,108.7479044485,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,73,108.77,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,141,13.7244509593,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,143,22.3270856841,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,146,22.814,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,53,113.4612221396,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,50,116.6127738223,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,68,111.33,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,99,79.9435066552,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,102,85.3326654888,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,110,83.654,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,135,34.6587474893,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,133,45.2744588367,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,129,60.608,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,127,46.169221961,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,126,56.0612992742,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,128,62.82,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,23,136.1020835479,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,22,140.6781236172,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,21,148.13,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,37,124.1842237694,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,34,127.9641263737,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,10,161.17,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,97,82.715684937,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,104,84.5173321024,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,105,87.575,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,114,62.3184127178,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,105,72.30012259,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,106,82.8215459232,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,104,90.443,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,66,104.1024405315,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,40,124.2569421596,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,43,125,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,29,128.0721908602,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,36,127.0117732956,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,46,122.52,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,56,109.0704903239,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,62,109.1696268888,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,62,113.95,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,118,75.61,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,45,117.7616227649,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,20,142.8181774311,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,17,153.79,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,107,70.6636669933,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,109,79.7308588602,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,116,80.05,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,36,124.3032974362,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,29,131.4264271868,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,35,130.22,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,48,116.002126485,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,32,129.7080782477,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,29,138.17,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,113,64.0408922945,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,115,73.1877692632,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,115,80.763,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,102,76.1321423867,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,101,86.0632820279,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,103,91.229,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,130,44.0670489026,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,129,52.353592012,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,130,60.407,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,78,96.0747505321,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,87,98.4514201541,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,86,102.85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,103,74.974143093,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,110,79.1931440215,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,108,86.025,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,111,65.1444647616,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,96,92.2047571444,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,64,111.92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,80,93.6958103452,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,89,97.7054606812,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,91,98.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,22,137.1678153734,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,42,123.4444494756,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,41,126.85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,30,127.0435824735,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,28,132.298778791,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,67,111.59,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,34,124.7259619664,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,33,128.4664377129,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,56,117.57,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,89,89.5788893679,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,99,87.2178016684,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,106,86.937,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,81,92.4212607527,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,86,98.9875902,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,94,97.948,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,69,102.1845606754,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,76,104.545598663,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,81,106.23,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,91,87.1056051191,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,82,101.076338461,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,51,119.92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,54,111.9887152348,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,57,113.2229165516,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,75,108.36,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,38,123.2391100109,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,24,138.9831090078,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,12,160.41,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,142,8.2628546432,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,144,16.6717201125,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,147,22.375,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,10,156.3972049079,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,9,166.0238041736,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,8,172.32,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,71,100.6570949308,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,93,94.7946970858,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,95,97.409,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,48,117.3202490839,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,6,179.47,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,27,130.7564224847,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,31,130.7519369069,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,32,135.29,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,85,91.4470787943,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,81,102.3134996186,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,77,107.81,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,106,71.4868626261,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,103,84.7792958179,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,90,100.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,134,44.0235230402,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,140,41.751,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,94,85.5329861131,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,111,78.8897378136,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,109,85.204,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,58,108.2167582535,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,71,106.4789463699,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,49,120.04,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,31,125.5685534344,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,23,140.3756414784,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,30,137.82,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,104,73.6119486861,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,118,69.9377017089,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,123,68.779,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,1,195.5672675154,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,1,214.7223036969,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,1,229.24,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,32,125.0581012572,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,77,103.9658854058,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,99,92.87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,16,144.4839700863,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,52,116.3706103432,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,60,115.41,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,132,40.0270302535,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,136,41.4864516608,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,131,59.908,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,41,120.315005191,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,49,117.2968185399,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,59,116.07,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,83,91.7159880857,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,79,103.0867476763,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,61,114.22,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,117,61.4226032977,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,117,71.9990549113,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,122,69.922,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,63,105.1807422985,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,66,108.4084544574,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,78,107.21,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,86,91.2487328255,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,113,74.925208158,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,117,76.098,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,60,106.541282455,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,72,106.0792438172,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,76,108.05,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,24,133.1149574032,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,45,121.657815179,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,48,120.68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,11,149.6345682888,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,10,157.9319914325,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,13,159.76,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,46,116.0866338909,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,68,108.1214041645,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,96,96.273,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,59,106.9946197222,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,47,118.2047588303,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,37,128.17,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,79,95.3947859232,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,74,104.9517949565,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,69,110.91,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,40,121.0667395798,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,11,155.742514693,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,3,185.82,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,116,61.6322834415,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,120,67.486072007,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,121,71.174,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,76,98.8986962112,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,51,116.4026866546,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,45,124.18,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,120,57.6504243275,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,92,96.1679413678,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,36,128.53,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,62,105.3621104648,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,65,108.5045170166,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,72,109.43,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,9,160.7756988993,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,7,175.0917835859,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,15,156.9,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,127,64.702,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,108,68.0000009462,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,112,78.6494827329,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,114,80.807,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,130,49.1677509802,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,134,57.121,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,12,155.6960141198,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,16,155.77,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,96,83.2183817899,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,100,87.0472988056,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,101,91.633,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,129,45.4768946787,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,125,56.1732995479,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,119,75.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,12,147.158587452,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,14,151.2979212881,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,9,165.06,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,17,143.2659109899,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,17,148.2675344662,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,25,145.36,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,68,102.3995808282,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,80,102.935971062,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,63,112.11,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,74,100.0966060592,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,56,113.2648729553,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,50,119.97,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,90,88.5853309021,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,75,104.798519774,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,87,101.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,134,37.2298367578,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,137,40.6525973211,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,141,39.377,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,98,80.5504308132,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,107,82.3787374566,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,112,83.351,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,65,104.5066324107,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,69,107.2353557088,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,82,106.17,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,124,48.4090791239,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,119,68.322257884,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,92,98.379,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,55,109.339159454,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,39,124.8634095559,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,39,126.96,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,148,10.304,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,3,185.2760930498,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,4,185.2760930498,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,5,181.3,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,87,91.0910409684,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,73,105.0783289538,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,47,120.69,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,137,30.8847359204,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,140,32.8267482411,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,143,36.239,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,100,79.3398295206,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,94,93.5967686374,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,83,106,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,84,91.6660765472,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,85,99.0438491558,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,52,119.87,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,140,20.3845474225,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,142,25.6914425227,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,145,29.214,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,43,119.2175618218,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,35,127.0351202949,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,26,141.33,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,109,67.2069107327,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,91,96.393250614,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,98,95.018,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,122,55.1041759785,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,124,58.5750454249,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,125,66.798,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,112,65.1417384065,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,108,82.1522459057,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,107,86.135,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,50,115.4458186571,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,54,115.4458186571,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,54,117.97,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,49,115.6777513352,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,53,115.6169083797,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,57,116.68,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,138,30.6934486326,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,135,43.8055680878,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,132,59.619,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,51,114.9231617331,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,61,109.1854156374,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,71,110.36,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,8,165.5432382068,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,8,168.9741035682,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,14,159.25,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,121,57.1368806149,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,122,61.6109614055,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,124,67.064,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,4,184.7167327301,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,3,188.6048748525,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,7,178.03,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,73,100.13288045,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,59,110.4136634592,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,93,98,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,93,85.6690567885,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,84,99.3018230606,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,79,106.51,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,39,122.6651202064,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,30,130.970231063,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,28,140.34,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,101,78.2603616049,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,105,82.9889313277,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,113,82.553,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,18,142.3333288371,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,55,115.3880622804,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,58,116.11,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,82,91.7315666411,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,83,99.4026299082,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,89,101.59,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,25,132.4348573141,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,43,123.1145734238,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,40,126.86,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,52,114.6773459325,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,63,109.1596364051,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,85,104.99,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,7,166.2648829206,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,5,179.3087029346,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,4,182.92,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,136,33.4032316438,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,138,40.6306708886,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,137,49.667,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,2,187.8614596296,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,2,191.2426941707,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,2,187.4,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,110,67.1055133263,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,114,73.2549596806,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,111,83.569,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,15,145.1827199416,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,15,150.2390258317,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,18,152.13,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,139,35.6315963055,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,142,36.964,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,35,124.339491422,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,27,133.5393338987,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,31,137.34,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,28,129.187323644,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,38,125.3928740014,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,55,117.85,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,6,169.6414275803,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,6,178.8753331482,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,80,106.46,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,57,108.4746048191,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,60,109.3494802707,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,65,111.91,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,64,104.5460368137,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,70,106.5619269076,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,74,108.61,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,47,116.0529770343,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,46,118.5711257806,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,44,124.57,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,115,61.7761724573,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,121,63.7015615002,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,126,65.395,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,18,145.7130031423,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,22,147.8,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,119,57.8092193833,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,139,23.8289875809,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,141,31.8048004181,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,144,35.365,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,67,103.6195849804,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,58,111.6316902732,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,38,127.29,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,92,86.3665577934,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,97,90.6412221487,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,123,53.4172925811,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,128,53.2269806575,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,136,55.74,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,21,141.2068149374,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,25,135.6408066253,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,27,140.84,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,61,106.0421332679,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,53,118.08,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,95,84.9040013498,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,98,88.704648787,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,102,91.464,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,42,119.9140420523,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,41,124.0851847814,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,42,126.46,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,125,46.7958949204,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,127,55.5328770397,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,135,56.964,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,133,38.3796130542,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,131,48.3841688037,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,139,45.002,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,44,118.6392243376,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,44,122.983535361,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,34,130.34,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,26,131.7138577517,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,21,140.7518857944,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,24,147.13,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,88,89.8564509528,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,95,92.7235886901,,,, +2014,USA,United States,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,97,95.448,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,77,96.2044912782,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,88,97.7752677754,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,88,101.88,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,5,175.3019077344,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,19,143.3891011978,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,23,147.66,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,128,46.0866585505,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,132,47.0486147514,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,133,58.275,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,72,100.4770986637,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,37,126.8331904544,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,33,130.56,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,131,41.6163950684,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,123,60.5905591253,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,120,74.775,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,118,61.2498761082,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,116,72.1320945639,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBSUBPC,6.01 Mobile phone subscriptions/100 pop.,100,91.909,2012,0,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),127,1.8095858455,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),133,1.7351740021,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),59,3.5756149323,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),84,2.9287615613,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),82,3.2468640262,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),31,4.7739858002,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),36,4.9012907579,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),29,5.3002893563,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),58,3.5908216667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),60,3.9199699182,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),57,4.256331942,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),75,3.0358020276,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),77,3.0846292107,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),74,3.5152306559,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),16,5.4768273872,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),15,5.8758418305,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),15,5.9223019055,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),17,5.3744698294,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),19,5.6577240265,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),20,5.7131602246,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),70,3.2465934297,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),64,3.6778903677,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),61,4.1863287902,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),140,1.4228280176,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),144,1.3297879658,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),148,1.3007191828,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),23,5.1465590645,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),25,5.4838999503,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),25,5.5200939557,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),112,2.1226373834,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),109,2.193751929,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),124,1.9796924684,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),139,1.5557042011,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),140,1.4920992154,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),139,1.666531193,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),125,1.8390016507,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),128,1.6537947178,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),134,1.715200026,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),56,3.7857528499,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),48,4.324198004,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),47,4.6092617274,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),30,4.7813803179,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),30,5.1347927154,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),14,5.9607558476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),61,3.4607622988,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),73,3.3207150577,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),70,3.6696640681,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),99,2.4987891394,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),108,2.2170933985,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),104,2.3447777429,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),108,2.4351026079,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),66,3.3351486626,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),58,3.9657610993,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),59,4.2138333865,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),24,5.0834519921,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),26,5.4817788563,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),33,5.1116388828,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),39,4.5674763025,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),49,4.3224517918,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),50,4.4727351081,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),114,2.2765903497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),102,2.4075884039,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),98,2.568447798,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),79,3.3084327638,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),20,5.2909693519,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),27,5.4392736053,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),27,5.4554539879,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),6,5.9452739329,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),10,6.1478305184,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),11,6.0722164698,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),55,3.8002439251,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),53,4.1160156789,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),52,4.3973228457,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),82,2.9243420997,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),83,2.9642560487,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),80,3.2747889157,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),113,2.1209118023,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),117,2.070911075,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),117,2.1681077611,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),134,1.6777304547,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),130,1.6529232254,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),130,1.7822504186,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),76,2.9947687874,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),76,3.0874411303,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),77,3.3953308144,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),94,2.6126999046,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),103,2.3723490526,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),97,2.8420983847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),65,3.3427098658,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),71,3.3688898268,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),64,3.9466071651,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),45,4.0614624077,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),44,4.5187902304,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),45,4.6164622774,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),38,4.569748904,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),29,5.1796170415,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),30,5.255053607,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),14,5.5260195461,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),14,5.8781133317,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),19,5.7153870217,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),4,6.2180432173,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),1,6.652296103,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),3,6.5713262061,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),87,2.7796833837,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),93,2.7276713132,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),93,2.921458205,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),89,2.7371933712,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),100,2.4612646877,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),104,2.5352650419,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),86,2.7977528343,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),85,2.9241873022,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),83,3.1777807771,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),79,2.9487832131,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),69,3.4253910297,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),71,3.6622417363,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),34,4.6999967579,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),31,5.1228507833,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),32,5.208770656,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),22,5.1652052889,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),23,5.5265973826,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),17,5.8426650465,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),142,1.3283351903,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),143,1.3419534309,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),146,1.4614924475,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),5,6.1503821515,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),6,6.4008836567,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),6,6.421823235,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),21,5.2734319124,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),24,5.5161343749,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),22,5.6530140695,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),105,2.3381173078,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),109,2.4303874233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),8,5.8823730031,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),9,6.1722794224,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),8,6.3263660331,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),83,2.9155490501,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),75,3.1581366431,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),76,3.4346768522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),116,2.0142133148,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),102,2.3985895044,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),100,2.7380939435,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),138,1.5289647489,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),145,1.4711651724,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),110,2.1748586563,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),118,2.0294798283,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),120,2.1190594406,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),49,3.9601113795,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),43,4.5252220755,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),43,4.7352977234,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),91,2.651247802,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),96,2.6732893821,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),99,2.7725355638,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),97,2.5494195236,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),106,2.2486787515,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),103,2.5407734474,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),12,5.6442569041,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),12,5.9077263622,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),12,6.0250305411,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),93,2.6273705324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),101,2.4505661727,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),106,2.4606121425,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),36,4.5806247931,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),39,4.8259779861,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),39,4.9925248147,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),121,1.9427830826,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),134,1.5783779852,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),132,1.7803822705,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),41,4.5262725582,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),42,4.669010689,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),40,4.9058260962,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),103,2.390765008,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),92,2.7404239793,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),95,2.9006213839,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),117,2.0093666356,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),121,1.9707408402,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),121,2.0828861963,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),25,5.0766274074,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),21,5.5942605542,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),23,5.5728587137,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),92,2.6281965654,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),108,2.2032123432,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),111,2.3867927744,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),9,5.8260919965,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),8,6.3524665755,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),7,6.3854558313,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),15,5.5255819161,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),28,5.4339917565,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),26,5.5070005475,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),29,4.7851127446,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),34,4.9257006263,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),37,5.0455096357,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),84,2.8748327642,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),86,2.8911481442,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),87,3.0976417428,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),67,3.3118256438,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),66,3.5547253136,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),67,3.792700029,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),13,5.6084101354,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),13,5.8783756331,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),16,5.9203743222,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),74,3.0940831082,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),54,4.0631471421,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),51,4.4226356097,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),109,2.1863903295,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),115,2.0837704562,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),113,2.3031506594,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),106,2.283447646,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),94,2.7026512866,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),102,2.5509706595,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),126,1.8190838171,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),112,2.1444738092,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),105,2.5053310445,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),2,6.274113297,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),7,6.3852906611,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),9,6.3172894248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),60,3.5510973972,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),40,4.825032823,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),38,5.0090837842,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),129,1.8723188678,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),68,3.2534233918,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),63,3.7026017355,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),58,4.2283474987,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),126,1.7434577961,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),136,1.6925462966,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),89,2.8032425806,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),92,2.9245746328,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),107,2.2411218514,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),110,2.1932172139,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),112,2.3788087745,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),130,1.7057081454,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),129,1.6530862927,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),127,1.9165441943,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),32,4.761769572,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),37,4.8568638496,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),41,4.8325969975,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),7,5.9111141319,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),4,6.4717066156,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),5,6.4301016662,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),42,4.5055124551,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),38,4.8423700628,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),31,5.2521716051,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),69,3.2487612069,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),67,3.5389491848,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),72,3.6276379209,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),71,3.1980346925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),72,3.3569100831,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),73,3.5541624689,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),132,1.6943451909,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),132,1.6008778624,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),141,1.5982806434,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),77,2.9754198848,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),82,2.9840721306,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),89,3.0651911824,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),46,4.034055629,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),52,4.1310726026,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),53,4.3812643973,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),129,1.7214851556,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),125,1.7618667229,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),118,2.1351544225,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),27,4.9390848401,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),22,5.5886563928,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),24,5.5480169446,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),143,1.5120541633,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),50,3.911648203,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),56,4.0133971266,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),55,4.3184660805,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),101,2.4643002017,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),90,2.7891407031,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),90,3.0420319158,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),138,1.5843175223,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),141,1.4514831115,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),144,1.5046866734,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),124,1.8409283066,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),116,2.078810663,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),116,2.2360279844,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),73,3.146407778,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),70,3.3839005338,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),66,3.8561721483,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),137,1.5860755884,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),136,1.5604806389,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),142,1.5487979058,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),47,4.010571487,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),46,4.443497296,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),49,4.4873024891,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),111,2.1594624318,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),99,2.5270842927,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),101,2.6858838961,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),105,2.3203722152,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),111,2.1590103636,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),110,2.4175191776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),118,2.0082410648,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),120,1.9827985981,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),122,2.0811562395,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),11,5.7811117565,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),5,6.4245791388,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),4,6.477404967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),3,6.2250158502,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),2,6.621318511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),2,6.5716972598,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),136,1.6226499523,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),137,1.5378642488,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),125,1.9645082471,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),19,5.3431623958,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),17,5.7845334024,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),13,5.9764400887,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),51,3.898589109,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),50,4.306575203,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),56,4.2976465719,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),104,2.3213890048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),123,1.8260099896,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),126,1.9336177817,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),64,3.4157430825,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),65,3.5884986552,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),68,3.7377141551,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),85,2.8690726612,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),87,2.8894500248,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),94,2.9081840495,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),95,2.6059779153,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),95,2.6855186218,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),91,2.936892188,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),40,4.5533941228,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),33,4.9974729473,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),36,5.0848059392,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),53,3.8615506941,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),59,3.9364991209,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),63,4.0266074118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),35,4.6714501871,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),41,4.7122863684,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),42,4.8295548852,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),100,2.4974348166,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),97,2.6646565583,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),98,2.7948431116,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),26,5.0673936387,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),16,5.8218661167,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),21,5.6919879659,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),54,3.8025911103,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),57,3.9708378942,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),62,4.1744694573,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),52,3.8963839512,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),45,4.5116426275,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),46,4.610088469,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),133,1.6919163084,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),139,1.4960008183,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),138,1.684816956,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),44,4.0756321786,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),47,4.3851497064,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),44,4.6749451588,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),115,2.1081095611,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),113,2.0893310937,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),115,2.2588082621,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),10,5.789316119,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),11,6.1258250381,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),10,6.1334105922,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),133,1.5899282,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),135,1.70242245,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),88,2.7420698739,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),91,2.7885822727,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),96,2.8525080345,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),57,3.6802746588,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),55,4.0141794695,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),54,4.3572489271,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),63,3.4491205105,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),79,3.0744088021,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),86,3.1102551152,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),37,4.5750200044,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),35,4.9249772015,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),35,5.0866609361,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),33,4.7603212113,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),32,5.0561145229,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),34,5.0875131319,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),1,6.3309387509,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),3,6.5335563853,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),1,6.5903388346,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),114,2.1117120895,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),119,1.9829202749,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),119,2.1322421088,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),62,3.7644568039,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),65,3.8740811177,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),98,2.5034079793,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),141,1.3744243459,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),142,1.3515355832,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),147,1.3405097507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),90,2.7305666881,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),88,2.8381708625,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),85,3.1718582602,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),119,1.9437176741,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),107,2.2046979311,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),120,1.9428898851,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),124,1.7983591494,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),128,1.8982555727,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),43,4.2561771045,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),61,3.774817226,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),60,4.1958641386,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),78,2.9510547561,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),81,3.2542413686,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),62,3.4522879951,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),68,3.5057641812,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),69,3.6913727287,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),28,4.9188402574,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),20,5.6575572492,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),28,5.4374446847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),131,1.7038950394,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),127,1.676130907,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),137,1.6887516498,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),135,1.6706491218,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),131,1.6450374384,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),140,1.6314789817,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),72,3.1576540222,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),74,3.1687655443,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),75,3.4922049848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),48,3.9834762441,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),51,4.1658283892,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),48,4.5464562014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),18,5.371131219,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),18,5.6596243118,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),18,5.7640454335,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),81,2.9372175555,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),80,3.0208592515,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),88,3.0707911775,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),80,2.9418659099,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),78,3.0834661951,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),84,3.1763369942,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),128,1.7972622982,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),135,1.5701767784,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),131,1.7804503921,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),96,2.568608013,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),81,2.9873208248,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),78,3.3932250166,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),123,1.8790347028,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),122,1.8412069356,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),123,2.0438920299,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),122,1.9003276672,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),114,2.0888400442,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C.06,Pillar 6. Individual usage (1-7),107,2.4462092276,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),130,2.5828226964,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),142,2.4791862216,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),62,3.660663291,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),85,3.3669209403,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),95,3.4127786599,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),30,4.5212711936,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),23,5.0662160291,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),21,5.2447873188,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),77,3.375490375,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),74,3.5139105735,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),77,3.6167497648,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),89,3.238079887,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),79,3.4431468685,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),73,3.6509690994,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),17,5.1861691917,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),18,5.2205787047,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),19,5.2800553101,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),20,5.0673032508,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),17,5.2318701356,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),20,5.268339986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),57,3.7309559497,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),52,3.9850893023,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),44,4.2449289522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),142,2.0517676544,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),144,2.0350283981,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),148,2.1199556427,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),23,4.9132320784,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),26,4.9678481789,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),27,5.0153677561,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),112,2.8913049614,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),127,2.6984669156,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),137,2.625990279,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),128,2.6159371302,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),126,2.7055552269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),127,2.7319762972,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),108,2.9834062508,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),121,2.8326787006,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),120,2.9068774463,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),68,3.5399749362,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),63,3.7478282632,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),65,3.8672263269,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),26,4.7704950675,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),30,4.8320323124,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),25,5.1283468663,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),99,3.1447886632,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),87,3.34032865,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),79,3.5916397494,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),123,2.6785220547,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),120,2.7490084562,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),113,2.9614076439,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),116,3.0222682358,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),54,3.7800172973,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),44,4.0798596256,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),47,4.1341087343,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),34,4.302825286,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),34,4.4449978248,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),43,4.2991048609,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),41,4.1004698455,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),41,4.2120317627,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),41,4.3565747495,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),110,3.100892,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),96,3.1747754302,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),99,3.2018317173,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),88,3.457292863,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),18,5.1058322667,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),24,5.0396408179,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),26,5.0443663444,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),7,5.542922205,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),8,5.7035266461,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),10,5.6376899379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),39,4.1240473603,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),40,4.2407141386,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),39,4.3698923621,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),51,3.8242857741,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),58,3.8028008455,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),61,3.9131779124,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),110,2.9228008981,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),116,2.9186437766,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),115,3.0371993596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),126,2.6593741849,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),119,2.8579720411,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),119,2.932283198,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),58,3.7198355998,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),64,3.7471910107,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),62,3.9090940122,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),80,3.3536814665,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),96,3.2475633816,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),92,3.4465296999,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),63,3.6390716299,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),59,3.7916948547,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),57,4.0249364847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),46,3.9130206218,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),48,4.0506048464,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),48,4.1324691164,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),38,4.1540065257,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),38,4.3528176755,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),40,4.35992048,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),13,5.333435912,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),12,5.5654331194,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),13,5.5107442002,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),3,5.7740391951,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),6,5.7527235657,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),7,5.7481195031,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),82,3.3304735707,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),86,3.360785907,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),87,3.4910990685,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),127,2.6584156461,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),140,2.4204154862,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),134,2.6602284161,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),97,3.1632367724,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),88,3.3291392052,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),74,3.6321361511,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),74,3.4244386361,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),75,3.4860051427,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),89,3.4537528633,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),32,4.3386630306,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),33,4.4597036209,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),33,4.5343749534,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),24,4.8019486164,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),25,5.0078663752,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),22,5.2239538624,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),133,2.5516241067,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),130,2.6219258993,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),130,2.7088127202,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),4,5.6625158462,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),2,5.9722068051,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),2,6.0060233875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),21,5.0647589411,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),22,5.1310486819,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),23,5.1635969995,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),122,2.8270603168,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),122,2.9034001418,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),11,5.4121893785,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),11,5.5925587129,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),12,5.5802197623,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),94,3.2050233513,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),77,3.4553457378,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),75,3.6313057916,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),114,2.859193552,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),102,3.1204011228,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),100,3.344303926,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),139,2.4698158885,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),144,2.3873897644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),95,3.1893064639,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),92,3.3185987644,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),99,3.3511707274,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),66,3.5507528373,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),68,3.6606549268,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),67,3.8289798767,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),101,3.1328554612,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),93,3.2761980099,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),96,3.4117699349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),92,3.222035628,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),97,3.2394776671,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),102,3.3362859327,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),16,5.2221210401,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),20,5.1813344712,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),15,5.4061936024,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),98,3.1565143427,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),111,3.0075407915,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),117,2.9519453878,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),47,3.8989143776,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),47,4.0606142502,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),46,4.1762222309,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),139,2.2545135267,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),143,2.1660471214,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),145,2.336877662,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),42,4.059076641,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),46,4.0681254079,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),45,4.2056608731,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),85,3.2838455943,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),70,3.5834838567,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),69,3.7472155099,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),78,3.3622907371,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),81,3.4056983558,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),91,3.4471214007,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),28,4.6642646002,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),28,4.8745275503,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),29,4.9184157407,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),104,3.0454135201,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),106,3.0613145206,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),113,3.0489619222,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),19,5.0966398925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),21,5.1476094971,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),24,5.1553054478,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),12,5.3556948241,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),14,5.4457964983,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),14,5.4523046755,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),45,3.9470152459,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),45,4.0771221401,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),51,4.074038694,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),79,3.3614009819,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),89,3.3233941717,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),94,3.4309809965,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),55,3.7734033418,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),60,3.7873894193,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),59,3.9636096134,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),8,5.5111843443,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),9,5.623317831,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),9,5.6872147736,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),65,3.6087713351,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),42,4.1787058507,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),38,4.385651689,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),91,3.2339558547,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),84,3.377522284,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),86,3.4922210743,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),122,2.6789801224,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),123,2.8112422751,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),126,2.8086011855,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),111,2.921926702,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),104,3.092604423,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),107,3.1558258456,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),2,5.8437280372,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),4,5.8592600774,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),3,5.8854756038,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),67,3.5496854802,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),55,3.9358792618,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),58,4.0043552548,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),112,3.0691641918,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),105,3.0178728686,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),98,3.2080494876,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),90,3.4488321645,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),114,2.9275887931,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),132,2.6801515333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),129,2.6467108808,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),139,2.5613062347,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),71,3.4679503446,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),90,3.3218824654,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),81,3.5373860162,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),134,2.5361585261,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),135,2.5223033291,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),138,2.5748902644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),35,4.2786466381,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),36,4.4053705978,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),34,4.5062245102,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),15,5.2601463545,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),10,5.6158891035,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),8,5.725974476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),44,3.979072264,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),43,4.1561355054,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),42,4.3455602406,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),73,3.4449196522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),71,3.5529791505,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),82,3.5334081635,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),90,3.2364616379,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),82,3.394027916,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),83,3.5325603683,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),136,2.4583296924,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),133,2.5501582982,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),129,2.7123948945,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),72,3.4477585661,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),66,3.680660218,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),71,3.7159795507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),61,3.6849001292,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),61,3.7803756155,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),56,4.0316039888,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),118,2.773888901,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),115,2.9259662235,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),111,3.0794982312,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),27,4.6936039921,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),27,4.9222158697,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),28,5.0141195437,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),146,2.22094321,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),50,3.8385406861,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),53,3.9461742565,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),52,4.0696005749,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),75,3.4044288833,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),80,3.4110174525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),85,3.5031290539,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),121,2.7278233404,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),128,2.6587202808,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),131,2.7035191724,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),138,2.3471910254,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),132,2.581627591,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),140,2.536975318,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),64,3.6134070422,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),65,3.712496131,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),60,3.9504966028,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),129,2.6156714481,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),131,2.6019545023,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),136,2.6345127991,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),29,4.5978514387,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),29,4.8342840192,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),30,4.8307817685,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),106,3.0066902876,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),101,3.1205872932,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),103,3.2490756225,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),109,2.9810798219,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),108,3.0438465523,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),105,3.1705945208,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),132,2.5669855513,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),124,2.7567843807,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),123,2.8443608321,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),9,5.4596264055,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),5,5.7789344166,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),5,5.864337178,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),6,5.5881978308,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),7,5.7489609702,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),6,5.7896878885,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),135,2.4771281489,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),134,2.5392006325,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),133,2.6617963405,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),22,5.0375654835,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),19,5.2044721767,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),16,5.3749901876,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),40,4.1223710533,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),37,4.3577654791,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),37,4.3984564431,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),107,3.0049196541,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),118,2.885190219,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),121,2.9067437318,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),56,3.7590940062,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),51,3.999975725,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),50,4.0982110596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),81,3.3406329257,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),91,3.319134191,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),98,3.363820037,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),86,3.2831031084,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),76,3.4587696119,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),76,3.6297518533,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),49,3.8778111248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),50,4.0103354284,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),54,4.0592355125,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),36,4.2591089743,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),39,4.3077047216,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),36,4.4000734967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),31,4.4675654151,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),32,4.503386636,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),32,4.5587155807,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),119,2.7684791866,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),110,3.0094631242,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),109,3.1303113123,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),25,4.7949414705,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),16,5.3491502641,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),18,5.3303397531,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),70,3.5032270322,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),69,3.6586894678,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),68,3.7609654258,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),60,3.6870253711,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),56,3.9133887145,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),53,4.0638910077,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),87,3.2786945111,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),107,3.0526425649,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),97,3.3867691847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),33,4.3254574488,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),31,4.7385113475,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),31,4.7778487497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),88,3.2406426228,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),100,3.1574583843,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),106,3.1688355254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),5,5.6041249522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),3,5.8642591194,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),4,5.8700163633,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),137,2.5033379027,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),135,2.644415946,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),100,3.1390842468,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),94,3.2726568379,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),93,3.4404795313,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),93,3.2217162278,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),78,3.4540582166,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),72,3.6576434715,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),102,3.1135393477,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),112,2.97144116,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),114,3.0389280496,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),48,3.8874081929,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),49,4.0357380476,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),49,4.1132080818,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),37,4.2396422595,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),35,4.4300034224,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),35,4.4357901385,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),1,5.9199599263,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),1,5.9969327537,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),1,6.0611227328,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),137,2.412834825,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),138,2.4870633946,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),128,2.7198137792,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),57,3.8516384264,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),64,3.8973260627,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),116,2.7867279607,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),140,2.2161875236,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),141,2.3432831205,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),147,2.1793292895,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),83,3.321036638,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),83,3.3910738001,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),80,3.58269801,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),115,2.8058604249,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),103,3.1170087146,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),131,2.5823699971,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),136,2.5117463731,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),141,2.4824104585,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),52,3.7877458396,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),67,3.6721999968,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),66,3.8628717917,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),53,3.7847131344,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),84,3.5096051561,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),59,3.6915810519,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),62,3.778778444,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),63,3.9013080167,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),14,5.3103997943,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),15,5.4452252895,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),17,5.3434391795,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),124,2.6721670313,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),120,2.8565867753,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),124,2.8375470692,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),117,2.7819756372,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),117,2.8901056548,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),125,2.8338507282,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),84,3.3096784912,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),95,3.2673487292,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),101,3.3366341029,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),43,4.0059694923,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),54,3.9395926798,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),55,4.0461810265,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),10,5.4480606629,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),13,5.5071019931,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),11,5.5972067305,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),103,3.0518194594,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),105,3.069753616,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),108,3.1337083703,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),69,3.5220186916,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),73,3.5164067483,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),78,3.5986172795,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),141,2.1577159834,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),142,2.2706021462,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),143,2.4354938331,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),76,3.3784823068,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),72,3.532886977,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),70,3.7234732699,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),113,2.8779361085,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),109,3.0423674787,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),104,3.1733220283,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),125,2.6716024994,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),125,2.7221097381,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.C,C. Usage subindex (1-7),118,2.9331926449,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",118,69.95843,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",121,70.36242,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",59,95.9386397823,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",58,95.9386397823,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",56,96.84529915,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",86,90.0338450216,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",86,90.0338450216,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",88,90.03384502,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",51,97.72598,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",50,97.79871,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",50,97.85877,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",10,99.53128,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",11,99.55152,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,ARM,Armenia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",11,99.56817,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,AUS,Australia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",12,99.5007541478,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",3,99.7598406748,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",3,99.75984067,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",120,66.57154,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",118,67.15936,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,BDI,Burundi,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",123,67.15936,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",136,41.65134,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",135,42.35942,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",142,42.35942,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",139,28.7292135966,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",141,28.7292135966,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",147,28.7292136,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",128,55.90261,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",127,56.77985,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",132,57.73479,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",45,98.31937,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",44,98.3524481093,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",46,98.35244811,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",80,91.35926,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",78,91.92275,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",80,91.92275,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",48,97.80921,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",49,97.88287,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",49,98.00262,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,1991, ,n/a,05/11/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",82,90.6981056181,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",82,91.1678254605,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",84,91.16782546,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",85,90.0366199364,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",85,90.298209844,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",85,90.37917744,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,BRB,Barbados,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",61,95.2928,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",62,95.21942,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",62,95.447,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",137,52.81469107,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",103,84.11568,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",104,84.4709,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",102,85.09085,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",43,98.5536760933,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",41,98.5536760933,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",43,98.55367609,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CHN,China,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",68,93.98489,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",65,94.2722,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHN,China,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",66,94.2722,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",130,55.25982,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",128,56.17108,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",134,56.86751,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",109,75.9,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",116,70.6799377977,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",118,71.29050773,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",73,93.2446864346,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",70,93.3723286895,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",71,93.58053364,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",100,84.80354,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",105,84.29006,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",105,84.93627,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",58,96.05997,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",57,96.15763,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",58,96.25802,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",47,97.92726,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",45,98.27978,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",42,98.67842555,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",92,88.2444613036,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",90,89.5387331937,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",87,90.10626788,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",115,72.6486791729,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",112,72.6486791729,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",117,72.64867917,2006, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",101,84.206964782,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",79,91.8540406535,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",82,91.58689849,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",112,74,2008,,National Source,11/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",113,72.0478526522,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",113,73.86558625,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",53,97.6792656082,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",51,97.7488961483,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,ESP,Spain,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",51,97.74889615,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",1,99.79422,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",1,99.79558,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,EST,Estonia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",1,99.79689,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",137,35.9,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",138,38.995981536,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",144,38.99598154,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,FRA,France,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,FRA,France,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",95,88.38389,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,GAB,Gabon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",93,88.98886,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",3,99.71986,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",4,99.72504,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",4,99.73247,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",119,66.62009,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",117,67.27296,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",122,67.27296,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",137,41.04688,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",143,41.04688,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",135,46.4969,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",132,49.95741,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",138,51.10727,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",56,97.16188,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",55,97.18821,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",55,97.3018,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",111,74.47045,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",107,75.1834,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",110,75.85726,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",104,84.99401128,2009, ,n/a,05/11/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",105,83.5889940225,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",102,84.7553618214,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,HND,Honduras,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",101,85.12331079,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",41,98.76207,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",39,98.82636,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,HRV,Croatia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",40,98.8807,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",134,48.6850220624,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",134,48.6850220624,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",140,48.68502206,2006, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",13,99.36626,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99.04557,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",13,99.04719,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",78,92.1923007082,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",74,92.5816951243,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,IDN,Indonesia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",77,92.81190757,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,IND,India,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",122,62.7544745734,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",121,62.7544745734,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,IND,India,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",127,62.75447457,2006, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",99,85.0187669836,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",101,85.0187669836,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",103,85.01876698,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,ISR,Israel,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",40,98.87206,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",38,98.93336,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",38,98.97965,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",97,86.36076,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",99,86.61514,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",99,87.04274,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",77,92.1995768836,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",75,92.5510428907,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,JOR,Jordan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",59,95.90445298,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",7,99.6778,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",7,99.69386,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",9,99.69386,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",94,87.00576,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",97,87.38124,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",97,87.38124,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99.2414048803,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",13,99.2414048803,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",12,99.24140488,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",107,77.586542727,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",109,73.9000255707,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",112,73.90002557,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",69,93.9062059464,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",67,93.9062059464,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",69,93.90620595,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",116,72.7022592,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",88,89.6124388817,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",88,89.6124388817,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",90,89.61243888,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",123,60.77754,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",129,60.77754,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",91,89.20996,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",92,89.5361,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",83,90.5579505067,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",81,91.181359335,2011,,"Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, Singapore", +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",83,91.18135934,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",87,89.6622,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",87,89.64732,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,LSO,Lesotho,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",89,89.64732,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",4,99.69551,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",6,99.70005,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",7,99.70355,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",2,99.78346,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",2,99.78384,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",2,99.78424,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",127,56.083672135,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",130,56.083672135,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,MAR,Morocco,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",124,67.08416203,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",44,98.46194,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",42,98.52359,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",39,98.97083,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",121,64.4809056435,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",119,64.4809056435,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",126,64.48090564,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",72,93.441878844,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",73,93.0689386848,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",72,93.51998478,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",57,97.12472,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",54,97.26855,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",53,97.3752,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",140,26.1765546403,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",140,31.0997539512,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",146,33.44121231,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",76,92.3630900571,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",76,92.3630900571,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",79,92.36309006,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",78,92.67915,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",52,97.7,2007,,National Source,11/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",43,98.37513,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",44,98.45932,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",55,97.48906,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",53,97.40807,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",54,97.35589,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",131,55.06164,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",129,56.10843,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",135,56.10843,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",126,57.45313,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",126,58.01511,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",130,58.61391,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",93,87.8971,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",94,88.51396,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",94,88.84715,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",113,73.68997,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",108,74.76636,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",111,74.76636,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",75,92.45693,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",72,93.1178855806,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",75,93.11788558,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",91,88.50757,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",92,88.75121,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",95,88.75121,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",124,60.81544,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",122,61.33857,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",128,61.33857,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",106,78.0029801808,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",106,78.0029801808,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",109,78.00298018,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",125,59.14452,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",124,60.31452,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,NPL,Nepal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",133,57.36910244,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",96,86.6211430154,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",98,86.6211430154,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",100,86.9389984,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",129,55.5263669975,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",131,54.892636149,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",136,54.89263615,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",70,93.61179,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",66,94.0941237876,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",68,94.09412379,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",89,89.5908130156,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",89,89.5908130156,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",91,89.59081302,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",60,95.4200993039,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",61,95.4200993039,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",64,95.4200993,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",11,99.50701,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",12,99.51965,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",5,99.73019,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",84,90.48063,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",84,90.40632,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",86,90.34799,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",63,94.91041,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",63,95.17895,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",63,95.43412,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",67,94.5582182312,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",68,93.8709150925,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",70,93.87091509,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",64,94.7242884444,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",56,96.2837397936,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",57,96.28373979,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",54,97.65442,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",52,97.67535,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",52,97.70193,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",9,99.5561,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",10,99.57627,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",10,99.57627,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",117,70.66911,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",115,71.05228,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",120,71.05228,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",98,86.13388,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",100,86.55028,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",98,87.15616,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",133,49.6951265235,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",133,49.6951265235,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,SEN,Senegal,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",139,49.69512652,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",65,94.70607,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",59,95.8573278137,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",60,95.85732781,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",136,42.11758,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",141,43.2831,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",104,84.1028877512,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",103,84.4927239035,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,SLV,El Salvador,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",106,84.4927239,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",50,97.77168,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",48,97.90237,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",48,98.01291,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",66,94.6209377407,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",64,94.6757505939,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",65,94.67575059,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",6,99.68452,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",9,99.68961,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",8,99.69498,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",95,86.93057,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",96,87.43657,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",96,87.8443,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",80,91.83646335,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",81,91.83646335,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",102,84.19466,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",138,33.61,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",139,34.47456,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",145,35.39147,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",71,93.5064757534,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",69,93.5064757534,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",73,93.50647575,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",8,99.67324,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",8,99.69151,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",132,50.6,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",125,58.3089827996,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",131,58.3089828,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",42,98.73643,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",40,98.78751,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",41,98.83491,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",108,77.5611313876,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",108,79.13057625,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",81,90.8167206508,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",83,90.8167206508,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",67,94.1060912,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",49,97.78,2008,,"National source, statstical yearbook, department of statistics, Ministry of Interior, via partenr institute.",11/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",47,98.02,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",45,98.42,2012, ,"Department of Statistics, Ministry of Interior",05/11/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",114,72.90113,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",111,73.2055,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",115,73.2055,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",110,74.6,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",110,73.21187991,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",114,73.21187991,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",5,99.68903,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",5,99.70679,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",6,99.71874,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",46,98.2678983834,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",46,98.0727062897,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",47,98.07270629,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,USA,United States,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",15,99,,,, +2014,USA,United States,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",14,99,2011,Assumed value,n/a,22/01/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",62,95.1546396284,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",60,95.5119939196,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",61,95.51199392,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",74,92.77831,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",71,93.17772,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",74,93.35947,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",123,62.38859,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",120,63.9094,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",125,65.26195,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",90,89,2008,,World Bank EdStats Db,11/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",93,88.7172506704,2010,See series note for details,assumed value, +2014,ZAF,South Africa,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",76,92.98314017,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",116,70.88103,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",114,71.2113,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",119,71.2113,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/11/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",79,91.85945,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO),11/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",77,92.23544,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,LITERACYRT,"5.04 Adult literacy rate, %",107,83.58271445,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/11/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",132,31.30734,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",140,31.51639,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",92,78.19502,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",63,90.92976,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",90,82.39508,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",54,92.31814,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",60,92.31814,2008,,UNESCO; UNESCO Science Report 2010 (p.283);www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/prospective-studies/unesco-science-report/,09/11/2010 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",66,92.31814,2006, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",77,85.84361,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",76,88.5321,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",72,90.22608,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",55,92.04443,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",74,88.65367,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",54,95.92731,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",1,129.22019,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",1,131.28582,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",1,133.04507,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",31,99.62421,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",40,98.92984,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",41,97.96985,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",81,84.48884,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",48,96.91662,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",38,99.52384,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",138,24.78757,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",137,27.95962,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",142,28.498,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",8,110.53265,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",11,110.51548,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",19,106.46234,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",127,37.07148,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",116,51.39515,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",123,47.6815,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",140,20.71763,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",143,22.60019,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",145,25.92291,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",116,49.27824,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",117,51.35264,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",119,50.7939,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",69,88.0228,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",72,88.8517,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",61,93.23216,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",18,103.05964,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",24,103.05964,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",56,95.51475,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",64,89.55026,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",71,89.29906,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",75,89.29906,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,21/06/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",99,74.81968,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",88,81.02179,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",91,81.02179,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",95,77.27046,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",23,101.33981,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",19,105.83225,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",20,105.83225,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,21/06/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",28,100.55183,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",22,103.72867,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",23,104.66018,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",11,107.28635,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",9,111.84155,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",15,107.8462,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",101,73.93747,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",91,79.98046,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",89,81.6574,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",92,81.70265,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",24,101.3154,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",29,101.49974,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",26,102.34816,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",47,95.23412,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",52,95.39561,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",51,96.18763,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",71,87.92101,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",70,89.3838,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",74,89.86536,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",90,80.05258,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CHN,China,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",90,81.1776,2002,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHN,China,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",82,86.6122,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",135,27.14373,2002,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",139,27.14373,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",141,28.87225,2002, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",123,42.19886,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",118,51.30071,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",121,50.37787,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",43,96.36312,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",43,97.47391,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",63,92.81474,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",72,87.52732,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",69,89.74241,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",64,92.73878,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",30,99.69202,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",30,101.46739,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",32,101.10615,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",34,98.38756,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",41,98.78194,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",62,92.82562,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",62,90.38502,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",67,90.31763,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",52,96.01708,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",20,102.58877,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",23,103.32467,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",30,101.7213,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",6,117.37025,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",7,118.70322,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",5,119.50733,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",96,76.44538,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",97,76.11702,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",98,75.10193,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",49,94.9299,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",54,94.9299,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",46,97.60729,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",89,80.42905,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",79,87.81259,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",80,86.84073,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",80,84.7473,2004,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",101,72.48419,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",97,75.86258,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",4,118.99171,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",2,124.72306,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",2,128.51477,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",17,103.63485,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",18,106.56271,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",13,109.11432,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",128,35.72439,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",130,37.57581,2002,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",134,37.15334,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",10,107.52007,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",16,107.54187,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",16,107.47822,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",7,112.58736,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,FRA,France,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",8,113.18583,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,FRA,France,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",11,109.92899,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",115,53.07932,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",117,53.89794,2002, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",21,101.82521,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",20,105.33817,2006,,UNESCO; UNESCO Science Report 2010 (p.283);www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/prospective-studies/unesco-science-report/,09/11/2010 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",47,97.37735,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",76,86.1899,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",82,86.1899,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",81,86.7572,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",111,58.27664,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",110,59.19855,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",114,58.1878,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",127,41.71295,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",131,38.80849,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",115,54.08471,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",114,54.08471,2012,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",115,57.48794,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",27,100.90353,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",13,109.46088,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",10,110.79568,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",110,58.53937,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",106,64.477,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",110,65.13756,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",60,90.98865,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",57,93.26537,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",22,105.40804,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",67,88.8,2009,,"Education Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government vis PI",11/11/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",92,80.1209,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",21,105.61817,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",101,73.45612,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",99,74.33283,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",102,73.08924,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",46,95.31157,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",51,95.69524,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",42,97.96422,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",35,98.31039,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",37,100.12404,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",35,100.77067,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",97,75.05736,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",96,77.15272,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",93,81.16273,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",109,60.1621,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IND,India,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",108,63.2145,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IND,India,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",105,68.50978,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",5,117.46405,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",4,120.98887,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",6,117.75919,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",83,83.53354,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",83,85.6692,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",83,86.27669,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",12,107.18761,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",15,107.96484,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",14,108.55373,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",59,91.04146,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",26,102.11572,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",27,101.94803,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",32,99.07437,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",35,100.39974,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",36,100.65865,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",44,95.62693,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",58,92.72988,2012,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",65,92.72242,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",58,91.08398,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",81,86.92785,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",76,89.05884,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",22,101.53111,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",25,102.19901,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",29,101.7654,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",41,97.00896,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",27,101.92162,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",45,97.71127,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",108,60.17172,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",109,60.17172,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",112,60.1232,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",82,83.99718,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",78,88.192,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",78,88.192,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",118,46.17507,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",119,46.55481,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",128,45.00671,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",39,97.05115,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",46,97.08053,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",50,96.72966,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",26,100.95795,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",32,100.95795,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",34,100.95795,2008, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",125,46.54073,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",87,81.42778,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",87,83.26888,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",100,73.98306,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",123,44.80356,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",127,45.15679,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",12,110.2763,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",24,104.30109,2006, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",74,87.07401,2004,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",36,100.24451,2011,,"Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, Republic of China",0 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",39,99.09557,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",117,46.39142,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",120,46.39142,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",118,51.69297,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",36,98.03731,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",42,98.70269,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",18,106.91848,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",37,97.59177,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",31,101.19186,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",33,101.01773,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",50,94.08315,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",53,95.19672,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",40,98.66374,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",114,56.09831,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",113,56.09831,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",104,68.87696,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",70,87.98113,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",80,87.71937,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",99,74.57293,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",133,31.09844,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",134,31.09844,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",132,38.02762,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",75,86.92076,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",73,88.78169,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",88,84.05133,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",84,82.78088,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",85,83.67676,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",91,81.91132,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",125,37.71738,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",129,39.48033,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",120,50.63493,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",14,104.81247,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",33,100.91237,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",57,94.95714,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",122,50.20602,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",16,104.02385,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",49,96.76369,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",69,90.90293,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",53,92.85951,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",59,92.59827,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",25,103.47871,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",137,25.45128,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",140,26.38109,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",146,25.91196,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",139,24.43922,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",142,24.43922,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",144,26.78745,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",66,89.37095,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",64,90.89944,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",55,95.85146,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",131,32.12059,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",133,34.17208,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",138,34.24368,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",104,69.05814,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",103,68.29508,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",108,66.88074,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",106,64.04979,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",107,64.04979,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",111,64.84946,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",121,44.04996,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",124,44.04996,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",129,43.82914,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",103,69.40615,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",102,69.40615,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",103,68.90856,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",3,120.21617,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",3,121.46396,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",3,128.41818,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",9,110.16356,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",10,111.00127,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",8,112.98291,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",122,43.5022,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",125,43.5022,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",109,65.81979,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",2,124.60413,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",6,119.08271,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",4,119.79301,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",25,101.29944,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",21,104.06372,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",58,94.16003,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",129,34.23148,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",132,34.98173,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",135,36.60088,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",100,74.10899,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",100,73.57305,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",89,84.048,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",56,91.60685,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",62,91.19856,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",70,90.68558,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",79,84.82232,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",84,84.82232,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",87,84.59854,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",40,97.04457,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",47,96.97108,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",48,97.35535,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",86,82.17879,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",95,77.20319,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",94,78.31899,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",13,106.701,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",14,109.10093,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",12,109.71296,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",105,66.93621,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",104,67.86038,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",106,67.76568,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",52,93.69384,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",28,101.72824,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",9,111.6167,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",48,95.10157,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",45,97.15839,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",53,95.98558,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",68,88.57177,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",75,88.57177,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",86,84.9163,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",130,32.1703,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",131,35.8105,2001,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",139,31.83211,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",15,104.32803,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",34,100.56781,2010,,"Ministry of Education, Singapore",29/11/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",7,114.2756,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",126,37.43125,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",126,42.07769,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",130,41.00445,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",19,103,2009,,National Source,11/11/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",17,107,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",17,107,2011, ,Economic Development Board ,26/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",138,27.61257,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",136,35,2011, ,"Ministry of Education, Science and Technology",26/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",107,63.0774,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",105,67.6174,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",107,67.20254,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",57,91.42763,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",61,91.4569,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",67,91.71193,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",98,74.82925,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",98,74.82925,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",85,85.36251,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",65,89.44209,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",66,90.35863,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",60,93.53806,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",38,97.05525,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",44,97.30631,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",43,97.94894,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",29,100.28679,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",39,99.20664,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",49,96.91104,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",112,58.11352,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",111,58.11352,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",113,59.92117,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",5,119.24975,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",31,101.33999,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",102,72.38803,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",136,25.68333,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",141,25.38692,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",147,22.7941,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",94,77.22811,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",93,79.2059,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",79,86.98294,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",73,87.24761,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",77,88.50802,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",113,56.25443,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",112,56.25443,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",116,56.61771,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",63,89.94062,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",68,89.94062,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",73,89.94062,2008, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",61,90.47439,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",68,91.08627,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",93,77.55733,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",88,82.10694,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",77,88.85072,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",33,98.98,2009,,"Ministry of Education, Education Statistics (Annual Report), R.O.C via PI",11/11/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",38,100.02,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",37,100.02,2011, ,"Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education",26/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",135,29.89017,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",137,34.97405,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",134,28.08148,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",136,28.08148,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",143,27.61282,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",45,95.57959,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",55,93.98579,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",44,97.77277,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",78,84.99307,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",65,90.42086,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",71,90.33587,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",42,96.45374,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,USA,United States,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",50,96.04074,,,, +2014,USA,United States,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",59,93.55017,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",85,82.51895,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",86,83.48354,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",84,85.36711,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",95,77.206,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",94,77.22363,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",96,77.22363,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,21/04/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",120,44.09933,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",121,45.77142,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",124,46.86382,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx,05/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",51,93.81168,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",56,93.81168,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",28,101.89414,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",119,45.6,2005,,"Childinfo.org. Retrieved here http://www.childinfo.org/education_secondary.php. On January 23, 2011. Also see: The State of the World's Children 2011, UNICEF, Table 5",11/11/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",122,45.6,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",126,45.6,2008, ,UNESCO Science Report 2010, +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",124,41,2005,,"Childinfo.org. Retrieved here http://www.childinfo.org/education_secondary.php. On January 23, 2011. Also see: The State of the World's Children 2011, UNICEF, Table 5",11/11/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",128,41,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ENROL2GR,"5.03 Secondary education gross enrollment rate, %",133,38,2006, ,National source,26/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),142,1.5238964391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),147,2.090909,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),42,4.5022925439,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),40,4.4678129,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),54,4.3281767,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),26,4.8819748953,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),17,5.168549174,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),19,5.132367,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),113,3.2004453684,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),115,3.1122974054,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),116,3.1686890244,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),81,3.7733923068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),71,4.0368608178,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),67,4.1652970154,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),19,5.0854919769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),24,4.8596076857,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),37,4.603249272,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),38,4.5710685937,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),43,4.4174523219,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),39,4.5988367765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),99,3.4007064506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),99,3.5175641445,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),110,3.3234804361,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),122,2.8368379652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),112,3.2021756982,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),103,3.4307923644,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),2,6.2934006972,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),3,6.1822769735,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),3,6.047389884,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),54,4.2480518214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),51,4.2962979538,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),66,4.1938008492,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),88,3.6167896456,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),80,3.8260798667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),97,3.7149914653,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),106,3.3112888411,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),113,3.1832180129,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),112,3.2859315057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),82,3.7684118863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),68,4.0418043634,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),59,4.2821205433,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),40,4.536755355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),56,4.181050531,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),77,4.0420559962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),41,4.527463,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),21,4.9804397,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),13,5.351057,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),109,3.274306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),117,2.9967763634,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),103,3.4549014536,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),98,3.613716937,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),127,2.6915598323,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),132,2.5598663966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),136,2.5578525589,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),10,5.3471208421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),7,5.5672684193,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),9,5.5021312293,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),25,4.8881987881,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),23,4.9171911852,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),29,4.7745913128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),71,4.090187,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),70,3.9542847615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),66,4.0666680454,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),92,3.7750259102,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),8,5.4296395766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),14,5.320543793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),17,5.1561360381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),4,5.8420455416,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),5,5.8299495385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),5,5.7957805233,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),124,2.8322542528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),117,3.0301278941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),107,3.373724675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),31,4.7490727809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),33,4.6071357754,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),48,4.4157707619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),90,3.6033356755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),73,3.9706815536,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),60,4.268655652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),80,3.7887596208,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),75,3.868816269,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),72,4.0692373021,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),83,3.7281773729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),107,3.4057806591,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),108,3.367336349,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),95,3.4585763005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),108,3.4021837031,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),100,3.5293552745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),46,4.4457651404,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),41,4.4626242052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),45,4.4934626441,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),16,5.1193850655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),13,5.3451910612,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),7,5.5629721937,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),66,4.0693928468,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),78,3.8367279946,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),83,3.9594204944,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),48,4.4435394896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),29,4.6613652185,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),21,5.0541134428,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),30,4.7687678824,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),38,4.4908666596,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),42,4.5440810658,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),139,1.9241028649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),142,2.0766494966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),146,2.1534457238,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),96,3.4468624435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),129,2.6649906375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),132,2.7053982235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),107,3.2925935163,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),102,3.459037,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),84,3.954974973,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),132,2.4387013456,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),139,2.2501851108,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),145,2.1627571015,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),111,3.2651580554,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),97,3.5539369856,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),88,3.8599512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),20,5.0699946833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),19,5.0443607039,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),26,4.8860316243,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),86,3.64492235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),105,3.413087225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),109,3.3666627342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),3,6.2588498074,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),2,6.2101250565,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),2,6.2643189368,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),15,5.1277198194,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),25,4.8539267059,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),15,5.1878440053,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),123,2.769171,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),121,3.0159382972,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),43,4.4841023077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),42,4.4549857692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),50,4.3674635227,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),100,3.3976525069,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),101,3.511298,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),106,3.3776743361,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),98,3.4040119651,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),93,3.6317113558,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),62,4.2428384819,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),106,3.410539,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),111,3.2999319586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),84,3.7181394464,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),74,3.9518942197,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),94,3.756074835,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),61,4.1495974239,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),54,4.226506025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),58,4.2844813741,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),130,2.5828707688,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),137,2.4029471665,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),139,2.3844702899,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),78,3.8104648235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),70,4.0379875988,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),53,4.3292072536,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),11,5.3315397548,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),11,5.3748319,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),10,5.4710114651,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),133,2.4342117028,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),138,2.2520883281,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),144,2.2179021461,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),29,4.8581446,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),26,4.7648690578,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),22,5.0492984588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),131,2.513398,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),130,2.6228399324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),120,3.0315256359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),37,4.573755155,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),39,4.4758417503,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),38,4.6024833963,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),53,4.26460925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),45,4.3888521103,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),35,4.6560685657,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),32,4.7372656732,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),30,4.658563227,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),32,4.7124567884,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),34,4.6001429649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),31,4.6567514207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),25,4.8886605248,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),35,4.5815832072,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),32,4.6289575128,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),40,4.5881288642,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),14,5.1667034292,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),22,4.9682909241,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),24,4.8892705217,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),79,3.8100863514,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),89,3.6741165051,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),78,4.0317003027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),74,3.9443131165,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),65,4.0778159318,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),61,4.2635584378,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),120,2.85356505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),116,3.0369738164,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),115,3.2126384294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),44,4.4668808794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),28,4.6903164476,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),30,4.751146,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),24,4.9025775339,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),27,4.7530416986,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),34,4.6639663345,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),85,3.676565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),81,3.8019174844,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),75,4.05369055,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),56,4.2106589073,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),76,3.8558979852,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),95,3.7525774906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),93,3.4957787854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),114,3.12946365,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),122,2.9685415975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),97,3.4043372743,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),90,3.6670389751,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),102,3.4767396765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),12,5.2384418667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),8,5.5483698667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),20,5.0992027352,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),94,3.4724142613,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),104,3.4389362425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),99,3.5994577784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),90,3.821059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),6,5.7118949589,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),4,5.8876002791,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),4,5.8240366883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),87,3.71183,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),125,2.9187135054,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),135,2.445764,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),130,2.7253789333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),55,4.2120616276,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),69,4.038152,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),46,4.4874779634,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),112,3.2111621528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),119,2.9819293476,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),105,3.3879349231,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),21,5.0457964365,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),16,5.2079885438,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),16,5.1569046418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),47,4.4447165711,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),46,4.3454009,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),44,4.5040067147,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),49,4.377912507,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),48,4.3212163766,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),33,4.6795959179,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),65,4.076936,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),53,4.2551765194,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),52,4.342714918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),69,3.9728284296,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),64,4.0916986545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),74,4.0632112342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),92,3.5452305775,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),82,3.801381118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),82,3.9701385012,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),126,2.7586868871,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),124,2.7648116677,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),131,2.7171558659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),75,3.9058548851,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),67,4.0526848441,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),51,4.3627756725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),128,2.691082577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),121,2.7998278156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),126,2.9045566163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),22,5.0348076444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),15,5.2145674545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),8,5.54519266,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),134,2.652528,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),39,4.5395470745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),44,4.3979573429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),23,4.9414957429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),67,4.0482996909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),63,4.1056120178,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),68,4.1259795702,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),123,2.8368358907,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),131,2.5815718345,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),137,2.5509195135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),125,2.8067618885,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),126,2.6887546569,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),133,2.6858784118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),63,4.1081387863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),49,4.3097772952,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),43,4.5406075458,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),73,3.9482042267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),96,3.560890184,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),113,3.2276755716,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),23,5.0226046305,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),20,4.9805069681,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),27,4.8649744946,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),121,2.8435962256,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),127,2.6882799771,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),128,2.858098687,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),102,3.3636832077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),92,3.6359059393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),117,3.0875725653,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),136,2.2230322199,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),128,2.6859054853,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),118,3.0772232438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),9,5.3508523306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),12,5.3701483793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),14,5.3068428036,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),76,3.8735021345,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),57,4.1578161426,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),47,4.428078679,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),108,3.2828545,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),95,3.5826075385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),89,3.84451715,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),7,5.4832385064,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),10,5.4937396387,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),12,5.3756165207,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),68,4.0448906569,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),86,3.7422655986,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),87,3.907388,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),87,3.6238670822,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),88,3.6778929333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),104,3.4044916333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),134,2.3987055871,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),125,2.759015576,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),114,3.2134831106,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),135,2.3541642943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),141,2.1481116795,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),140,2.3512737778,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),115,3.143793,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),98,3.55218968,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),96,3.7399661771,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),52,4.2914825945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),59,4.129355447,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),69,4.1258037415,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),91,3.5743556142,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),84,3.7884476336,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),93,3.7747677406,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),105,3.3273817971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),94,3.5920485331,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),73,4.0650612907,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),137,2.1643244913,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),140,2.2047984494,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),142,2.3416441101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),13,5.169013,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),9,5.5163947258,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),6,5.6239164834,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),45,4.451976132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),55,4.1850243823,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),57,4.3013984199,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),50,4.3494471804,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),52,4.2869837046,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),56,4.3138117924,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),64,4.0877309274,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),62,4.111283,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),70,4.1236128909,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),27,4.879576,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),37,4.5205798154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),64,4.2157219137,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),71,3.9526620806,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),79,3.8320174837,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),79,4.0121107521,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),1,6.3521547051,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),1,6.3055625818,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),1,6.2935508768,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),134,2.503594,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),135,2.56329815,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),129,2.5932927,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),133,2.5291941161,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),129,2.8030187051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),58,4.1665473851,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),60,4.12453585,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),55,4.3273410573,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),89,3.60647,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),85,3.7832033014,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),81,3.9721337747,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),72,3.9516642857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),83,3.7989582301,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),86,3.9083719121,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),17,5.114578,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),18,5.0697568773,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),18,5.1332266779,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),28,4.862169742,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),36,4.5747229119,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),41,4.5513578123,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),110,3.2722732947,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),110,3.2156932923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),91,3.7914658759,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),72,4.012227,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),65,4.2155626698,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),62,4.1175531949,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),116,3.1172499885,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),111,3.2147829257,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),127,2.8882768957,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),60,4.1621661561,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),61,4.1114854154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),80,3.9845745783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),114,3.1893019377,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),91,3.6664145869,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),140,1.8498336426,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),136,2.4037557682,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),141,2.3433529232,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),33,4.608342319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),35,4.577217791,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),36,4.6482674965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),18,5.1120054517,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),31,4.7166336048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),103,3.352962794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),100,3.5158827683,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),101,3.5162847374,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),5,5.819730794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),6,5.5717015159,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),11,5.433820061,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),119,2.9347646764,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),122,2.7875703581,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),138,2.4671708545,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),101,3.3749250154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),109,3.3930192663,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),119,3.0768412721,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),36,4.57852245,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),34,4.5943681934,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),28,4.7831815419,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),104,3.3356291627,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),118,2.9873796552,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),124,2.9329198376,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),51,4.2974140164,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),47,4.3233171455,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),49,4.4130840704,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),118,2.9485575277,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),120,2.8853142214,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),123,2.9395074387,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),59,4.16523692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),58,4.14670625,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),85,3.9456052195,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),141,1.690018,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),144,1.9356049143,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),143,2.253692056,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),138,2.0752158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),143,1.9943352882,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),148,1.8756357402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),77,3.8122903229,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),77,3.8534576308,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),76,4.0494369609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),57,4.1984058,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),50,4.3069454667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ130,5.02 Quality of math and science education (1-7),63,4.2407252645,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),141,1.9400281734,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),144,2.235294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),45,4.2042747774,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),52,4.0432964469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),52,4.04580125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),29,4.611516515,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),17,4.9798801798,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),15,5.089388,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),86,3.3657966316,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),89,3.3648649459,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),104,3.1977448792,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),97,3.2163957255,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),79,3.5350823945,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),69,3.6619213744,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),13,5.1212314615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),15,5.0188191714,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),23,4.7815462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),24,4.7165707302,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),26,4.7171278636,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),24,4.752290075,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),113,3.0403013169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),109,3.0656078304,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),114,3.0740395444,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),137,2.2922860261,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),143,2.009527787,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),143,2.2602410376,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),6,5.4794698056,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),5,5.406049596,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),7,5.3176077787,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),43,4.2505757821,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),71,3.6232925692,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),101,3.246992756,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),124,2.7058696608,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),124,2.7818931531,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),127,2.7237238429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),85,3.3747619873,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),97,3.2450634194,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),98,3.2585724701,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),101,3.1890565606,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),98,3.2439006537,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),90,3.4166771463,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),31,4.5550762409,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),35,4.3596552207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),48,4.1155549575,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),73,3.643253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),106,3.1114492,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),132,2.676337,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),126,2.651881,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),106,3.1443614873,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),96,3.2598465907,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),89,3.4255400932,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),115,3.005410336,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),116,2.9682196494,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),121,2.9789931224,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),15,5.0754453105,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),7,5.3754011826,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),6,5.3399840195,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),28,4.6235695114,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),25,4.7214808333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),32,4.4172209641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),41,4.26914,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),58,3.867079444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),55,3.9575482876,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),65,3.748159382,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),7,5.4222443351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),6,5.4043553075,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),10,5.2474257606,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),1,5.9435530373,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),1,5.9798320284,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),1,5.9823499667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),87,3.3569494453,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),91,3.3590338098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),74,3.617812475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),54,3.9703209746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),57,3.9353126923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),54,4.0168957381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),114,3.0355531524,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),95,3.2711421375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),83,3.5022646451,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),78,3.5119018695,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),66,3.7230348828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),60,3.8952685301,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),72,3.680464287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),77,3.5543125617,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),86,3.4816980633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),66,3.7674721259,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),64,3.7973002372,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),61,3.8549617809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),23,4.7759976383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),21,4.8532443316,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),20,4.8734344304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),30,4.5909670309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),22,4.8055580101,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),9,5.2976782204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),49,4.0910434961,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),59,3.9189515462,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),67,3.6891003864,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),17,4.9314911153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),20,4.916195155,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),14,5.1353695976,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),16,5.0277650632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),19,4.9539245677,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),21,4.8586362352,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),136,2.3130313536,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),137,2.3567028414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),140,2.5359297143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),123,2.7596294174,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),131,2.5176333292,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),133,2.6690432408,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),105,3.1571259265,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),93,3.294142,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),62,3.8362093159,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),135,2.3176798245,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),139,2.2692923196,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),145,2.2211402346,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),98,3.2128462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),81,3.4881512366,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),77,3.59962914,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),42,4.2827803667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),49,4.0912170596,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),47,4.1405731994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),59,3.8609878063,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),85,3.42261635,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),108,3.1405816025,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),3,5.8516294838,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),2,5.8361028783,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),2,5.9303879,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),34,4.4628820287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),41,4.1702797227,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),43,4.2138865866,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),127,2.667836,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),126,2.7310082393,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),20,4.8319471538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),27,4.7031771769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),26,4.6245676818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),116,3.0029888521,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),114,3.021651,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),105,3.1547183657,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),74,3.6424244408,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),62,3.8234223448,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),46,4.1670901034,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),128,2.666981,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),139,2.5587213793,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),32,4.5275216166,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),29,4.6419298331,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),29,4.4761180294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),120,2.8533649943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),115,2.9951358381,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),112,3.1017451868,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),127,2.6024909625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),130,2.6479835391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),135,2.628376113,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),56,3.9186802471,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),42,4.1603476116,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),49,4.1070327818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),21,4.8193894903,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),23,4.7853773375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),22,4.8324714907,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),129,2.576552389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),135,2.4069492673,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),141,2.4425499433,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),89,3.303841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),99,3.2373098505,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),97,3.3564689332,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),140,1.968724,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),141,2.0642482498,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),142,2.3126728826,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),80,3.4527539122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),90,3.3648003281,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),93,3.3996313414,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),44,4.23144535,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),47,4.1310663379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),36,4.3279972,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),38,4.375557488,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),34,4.3758287351,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),33,4.3994758135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),11,5.1781537299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),9,5.3211859577,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),5,5.4631306684,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),104,3.1720816044,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),94,3.2922296447,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),103,3.2011382827,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),5,5.6317196949,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),8,5.3732566259,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),16,5.0797154728,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),48,4.1040952594,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),53,3.982843101,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),56,3.9984982865,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),88,3.3403007275,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),87,3.3862151642,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),72,3.6354620785,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),103,3.1787201246,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),76,3.5786251703,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),66,3.6978738588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),51,3.9920429619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),31,4.4377262381,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),27,4.605385,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),36,4.4109259649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),43,4.1514048139,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),50,4.0974652469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),112,3.04831,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),101,3.2040423911,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),88,3.4314123976,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),27,4.6631357244,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),37,4.273436263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),44,4.2032624,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),95,3.2551764646,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),123,2.78626945,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),123,2.7459850725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),68,3.7526473168,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),58,3.9331959107,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),76,3.6031088971,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),55,3.9303230722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),44,4.1419640667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),64,3.8157048659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),108,3.1104922896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),104,3.1211665195,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),106,3.1497257081,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),57,3.964264,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),12,5.1283965187,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),10,5.290855907,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),13,5.1622223584,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),56,3.953381,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),96,3.3884256486,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),142,2.048602,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),148,1.9182777333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),40,4.3221578069,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),33,4.429522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),28,4.5697340659,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),91,3.2895040423,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),102,3.201982247,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),73,3.6329588527,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),64,3.798555519,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),54,3.973642977,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),59,3.9507402153,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),35,4.4606946627,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),36,4.3541594938,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),34,4.3980012206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),70,3.6940590197,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),74,3.5870469036,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),68,3.6792339846,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),93,3.28057,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),105,3.1190556463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),110,3.1273373344,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),102,3.1803337845,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),103,3.1972899273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),115,3.0495350308,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),118,2.9644409533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),117,2.9642439483,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),117,3.0240652562,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),107,3.1166038929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),100,3.2243605911,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),119,2.9880509642,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),75,3.6303938124,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),88,3.3703574672,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),70,3.6610800883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),119,2.8894902602,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),118,2.9467678597,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),122,2.8814558806,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),18,4.9030264889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),16,4.9924383091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),8,5.31196304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),125,2.734547,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),39,4.368345058,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),38,4.2471515312,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),35,4.3560043584,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),132,2.3921419727,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),136,2.3785642852,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),137,2.5660123632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),99,3.1990913814,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),119,2.8573932069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),129,2.7027066393,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),139,1.9914582382,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),138,2.3433149229,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),136,2.5911230294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),50,4.007372975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),46,4.1357866108,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),37,4.3142851417,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),47,4.1301787067,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),65,3.755576904,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),92,3.404679775,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),14,5.093450001,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),14,5.144323262,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),19,4.9956887432,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),122,2.7835573333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),126,2.7179565962,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),118,2.9884046919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),65,3.7975415681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),83,3.4628713421,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),113,3.0850705023,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),134,2.3281374528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),121,2.8124084441,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),107,3.1473313541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),10,5.2051987823,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),13,5.2672658793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),12,5.1721628237,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),22,4.7896663882,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),18,4.9614557664,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),18,4.9962823601,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),100,3.192242185,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),92,3.3545976923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),94,3.3969883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),9,5.3267782968,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),11,5.2852376028,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),11,5.1891243728,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),46,4.1704949356,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),60,3.8909422541,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),53,4.01756,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),79,3.4910367017,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),75,3.584880275,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),84,3.4949113125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),131,2.4211744912,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),112,3.0493992142,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),75,3.6075677099,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),128,2.5985208126,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),132,2.4803606772,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),134,2.6624428562,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),61,3.82562104,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),45,4.1388175467,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),40,4.2751468687,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),71,3.6845081238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),68,3.6690420475,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),87,3.4401241942,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),57,3.9104406959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),51,4.0464534366,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),63,3.8193859648,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),76,3.5789777749,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),61,3.8485743108,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),58,3.9603739674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),138,2.2077634151,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),133,2.4771033529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),138,2.5609671971,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),4,5.638027,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),4,5.6823991318,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),4,5.7555783223,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),90,3.2970328082,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),108,3.0708694833,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),99,3.2512476348,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),82,3.4326250658,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),86,3.3886852357,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),85,3.4849201517,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),52,3.9792922836,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),50,4.071635,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),51,4.050030081,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),25,4.706644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),32,4.4350270154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),39,4.288336097,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),60,3.8279139199,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),73,3.5917377859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),80,3.5276057896,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),2,5.9278801263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),3,5.8103268061,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),3,5.7732548183,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),125,2.770843,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),116,3.02971315,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),125,2.6669816357,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),134,2.4703226016,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),109,3.1308257718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),111,3.0903272733,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),111,3.05670565,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),111,3.1122295101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),81,3.442986,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),84,3.4355232197,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),102,3.2184261874,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),117,2.9758661143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),120,2.8157371247,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),130,2.6908224725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),63,3.815276,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),63,3.8144619166,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),55,4.011294425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),8,5.3417597174,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),12,5.2793952807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),17,5.0405600057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),110,3.1037563158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),110,3.057530022,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),81,3.5204374386,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),48,4.102358,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),31,4.4230408063,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),96,3.2461654842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),109,3.1050062798,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),113,3.0345828294,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),131,2.6814535464,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),77,3.5700016675,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),78,3.5397144308,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),78,3.5749061752,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),84,3.3860540774,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),67,3.7176685949,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),130,2.5419395344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),129,2.6581358909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),124,2.744376471,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),37,4.3863970524,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),40,4.2193741019,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),45,4.1934230067,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),41,4.3172585234,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),71,3.6596642,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),94,3.2694722283,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),82,3.4830587415,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),91,3.4099059637,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),19,4.8729489564,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),24,4.7659286174,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),30,4.457512956,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),92,3.2868079281,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),80,3.5021775236,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),100,3.2497850785,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),67,3.7583269253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),69,3.6599691554,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),82,3.502292918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),62,3.8170933,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),70,3.6354393249,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),79,3.5534024512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),83,3.4118679143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),107,3.0971128221,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),120,2.9867089347,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),26,4.6675242389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),28,4.6611213748,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),25,4.6259147286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),121,2.8300722361,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),122,2.7872135786,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),128,2.719278571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),69,3.712908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),72,3.60161025,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),95,3.3921552927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),142,1.719993,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),144,1.8313397429,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),147,1.985136504,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),133,2.33049725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),140,2.2275057324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),146,2.1337375348,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),53,3.9736130029,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),39,4.2340973429,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),38,4.3026638302,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),33,4.4862965667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),30,4.4792556333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ128,5.01 Quality of the educational system (1-7),42,4.2578758397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),137,2.4559283716,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),141,2.2606519185,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),56,5.1815760248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),56,4.9634910202,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),62,5.1562673468,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),38,5.5255344418,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),25,5.5377219577,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),33,5.6189632894,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),80,4.8275203682,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),80,4.6634063933,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),79,4.8505524676,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),62,5.0874060718,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),59,4.9390066069,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),47,5.3709163892,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),11,6.0313621114,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),17,5.6379565314,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),20,5.846198868,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),24,5.7944812423,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),24,5.5519759417,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),22,5.794968254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),82,4.8066411342,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),57,4.9624917906,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),66,5.0893383447,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),135,2.6800586481,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),134,2.7922808398,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),137,2.4480448811,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),3,6.4228988775,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),3,6.1079461136,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),4,6.3412494157,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),126,3.2484953817,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),124,3.3854580446,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),130,2.7568632051,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),142,2.1325316612,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),142,2.4269949417,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),144,2.109678827,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),125,3.3158675992,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),128,3.2404718028,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),128,2.835206913,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),70,4.97861358,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),70,4.7926313098,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),56,5.2621506759,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),36,5.5973888784,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),44,5.1967674563,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),58,5.2281636183,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),45,5.3004587665,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),49,5.1097401181,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),57,5.2506463093,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),116,3.6735229637,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),95,4.4872192511,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),94,4.3932239227,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),93,4.5407147359,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),86,4.721799131,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),91,4.4247488119,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),91,4.6203086889,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),10,6.0853227899,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),22,5.5600070541,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),15,5.9473717496,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),25,5.7822976632,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),31,5.3768184252,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),30,5.6891877631,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),114,3.6263678745,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),85,4.753827522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),86,4.5220449106,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),92,4.5691365778,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),5,6.1926522297,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),6,6.0168345126,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),8,6.1008904497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),4,6.3359117959,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),4,6.1011858573,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),3,6.3641342548,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),83,4.7893823613,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),66,4.8475072716,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),71,5.0204937571,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),57,5.1802293928,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),53,5.0081054038,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),59,5.1811052088,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),131,2.8722377468,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),130,3.1705830466,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),133,2.6529599722,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),114,3.7419023316,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),103,3.8664185985,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),116,3.5964047481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),58,5.1460921592,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),74,4.7722526812,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),76,4.8948279488,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),84,4.7617594865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),90,4.4328594674,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),82,4.7624263877,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),26,5.7195573226,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),23,5.5552920686,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),24,5.7577861054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),17,5.8549656335,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),16,5.660728003,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),11,6.0540193112,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),44,5.3378776373,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),50,5.0951016593,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),49,5.328135155,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),20,5.823438903,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),19,5.6220669511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),12,6.0473707601,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),14,5.9288144882,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),18,5.6328427158,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),18,5.8506793252,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),107,3.8747789801,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),105,3.7856472455,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),106,3.8750159481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),97,4.3999535065,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),101,4.0228129512,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),102,3.9864778596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),96,4.4212583197,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),84,4.5394710971,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),75,4.9433509756,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),108,3.8722310716,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),115,3.5618231414,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),120,3.3175239068,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),64,5.072346646,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),46,5.1813577386,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),50,5.3265959876,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),18,5.8340125705,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),30,5.4337890233,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),25,5.7566512059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),132,2.8579694289,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),137,2.61115126,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),140,2.3014494637,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),1,6.5073010746,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),1,6.4500582904,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),1,6.5486767092,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),16,5.8773317138,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),21,5.5865253606,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),19,5.850432648,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),116,3.5545623298,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),113,3.6580353251,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),21,5.8086936172,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),15,5.6614689031,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),28,5.692699219,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),79,4.8331850625,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),83,4.5564281969,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),78,4.8538232089,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),112,3.7939769525,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),106,3.7725800984,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),110,3.7494764545,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),135,2.7258288624,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),142,2.1742068671,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),121,3.6055949564,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),120,3.4977823208,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),124,3.1954152447,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),55,5.1930735588,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),41,5.2482797932,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),53,5.2945709259,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),122,3.4931885494,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),118,3.5317946181,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),122,3.3095528096,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),88,4.6823921017,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),82,4.5590949909,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),60,5.1803052521,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),23,5.8055127331,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),52,5.0454761221,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),10,6.075870739,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),105,3.9170372277,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),108,3.7236054045,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),112,3.67280036,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),42,5.4266394434,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),51,5.0935244359,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),36,5.5548576183,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),138,2.4371658436,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),143,2.3719579081,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),143,2.1147328395,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),40,5.4617835203,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),42,5.2430785367,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),41,5.5005286844,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),69,4.9934632849,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),63,4.8835045385,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),61,5.1593293281,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),100,4.2677015442,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),95,4.3070775221,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),101,4.0043348085,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),15,5.9242554255,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),12,5.777273465,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),9,6.0879477983,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),81,4.8224755386,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),69,4.7933141642,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),85,4.7299115043,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),7,6.1792870328,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),9,5.8746957748,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),13,5.9922464986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),48,5.2887336133,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),32,5.3732741724,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),39,5.5075496473,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),51,5.2807224745,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),45,5.1833988222,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),43,5.4741321699,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),90,4.6482017634,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),88,4.4756598057,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),87,4.7081139584,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),49,5.2875475521,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),34,5.3280245971,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),38,5.5136350014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),22,5.8080571265,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),13,5.7297407428,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),29,5.6903578954,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),60,5.1180824191,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),62,4.91176196,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),51,5.3230091321,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),87,4.7008821824,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),93,4.3941803661,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),98,4.2923291663,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),75,4.8695562844,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),92,4.3964500532,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),89,4.6796149335,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),111,3.8154803116,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),109,3.6813564378,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),119,3.3418522301,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),27,5.7160810791,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),14,5.6675836681,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),31,5.6597593032,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),66,5.0219083706,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),71,4.7876738314,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),70,5.0313634007,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),118,3.5139051841,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),33,5.6476294846,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),28,5.4940892647,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),45,5.4105239929,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),122,3.4228845735,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),131,2.7501311427,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),97,4.1845525424,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),96,4.3712029422,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),54,5.19714816,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),38,5.2582936,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),40,5.5058835072,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),106,3.9008562333,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),119,3.5282786997,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),103,3.9501788681,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),30,5.667767594,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),29,5.4553105601,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),23,5.7769112143,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),31,5.6604710302,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),33,5.33082372,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),27,5.7255019838,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),43,5.4016479327,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),54,5.006407881,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),35,5.561527335,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),119,3.6164441421,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),114,3.6287322081,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),111,3.7341495652,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),65,5.0296454811,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),78,4.6929121679,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),84,4.7410668179,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),130,3.102116334,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),127,3.2631940466,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),126,2.8849198783,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),91,4.5881143635,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),87,4.5053243362,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),95,4.4222075797,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),68,4.9998592073,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),77,4.7029346184,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),68,5.0747563287,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),141,2.2167736676,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),136,2.633449738,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),139,2.4054522686,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),19,5.8292860829,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),26,5.5281892703,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),16,5.9047702682,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),115,3.6031772823,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),28,5.6802399122,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),40,5.2507459804,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),34,5.6159771655,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),71,4.9239952085,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),72,4.7785971244,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),65,5.1226680854,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),134,2.6854499133,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),140,2.4416302554,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),147,2.0003992933,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),139,2.4054673214,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),139,2.4966433806,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),145,2.0829414827,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),63,5.0818635448,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),67,4.8230484704,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),52,5.3154338464,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),115,3.7007496334,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),121,3.4693213977,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),125,3.0295198107,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),47,5.2903366843,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),43,5.1970516976,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),67,5.0866551171,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),104,3.9931088003,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),111,3.6746303396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),104,3.9066041209,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),123,3.4355660642,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),123,3.4008259374,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),132,2.7056829429,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),120,3.612013528,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),112,3.6402501849,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),109,3.7576910934,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),8,6.11869403,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),8,5.8913127215,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),7,6.1197514068,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),34,5.6454733824,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),27,5.5208587102,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),17,5.8560902598,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),128,3.2197195745,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),131,3.1697012902,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),121,3.315140987,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),6,6.1821854526,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),11,5.811609773,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),6,6.1411852234,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),50,5.2820047714,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),68,4.8124233984,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),73,4.9888646152,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),129,3.130755611,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),129,3.1855157126,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),136,2.537612965,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),102,4.085319008,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),99,4.1735227721,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),86,4.7186740356,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),99,4.3678736047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),100,4.0711652624,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),99,4.2689627371,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),77,4.8621382512,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),73,4.7726354306,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),69,5.0693909154,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),41,5.4280648408,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),47,5.1518176691,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),48,5.3357094479,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),78,4.8406051461,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),55,4.9727562252,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),90,4.6764541566,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),59,5.1231757952,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),48,5.1434928673,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),46,5.3971992227,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),109,3.8568942346,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),107,3.7368095528,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),105,3.8888563947,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),13,5.9752533829,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),5,6.0414694564,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),5,6.2617228787,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),46,5.2969160764,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),58,4.9453126321,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),54,5.263765314,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),53,5.2202796923,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),61,4.9125833635,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),64,5.131585619,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),118,3.6374701082,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),113,3.6364471071,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),123,3.2502882356,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),35,5.6148127987,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),37,5.2885459067,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),55,5.2634479721,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),127,3.2392289007,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),126,3.2985356956,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),134,2.6407828634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),2,6.462442677,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),2,6.1838480109,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),2,6.4204971731,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),144,2.1045505323,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),146,2.0274798145,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),113,3.7934940212,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),117,3.5529587526,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),107,3.8477012461,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),61,5.1067551775,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),65,4.8606215391,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),63,5.1548900215,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),89,4.6768447227,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),89,4.4628217119,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),77,4.8565776819,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),67,5.0118111829,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),75,4.750724898,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),72,5.0135239354,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),29,5.6703395048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),36,5.2988322636,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),26,5.7428758497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),12,6.0306636166,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),10,5.8430398452,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),21,5.8328369468,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),103,4.035972599,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),110,3.6810002616,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),100,4.141259755,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),60,4.9193163495,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),44,5.4403589308,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),94,4.4973742886,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),140,2.3005520103,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),141,2.434103,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),148,1.8924326105,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),74,4.8702639583,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),76,4.7471617455,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),74,4.9471867014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),72,4.8959280403,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),64,4.863751882,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),133,2.766543329,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),133,2.8190917375,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),135,2.6114078531,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),37,5.5326900598,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),39,5.2546990389,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),42,5.493228441,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),52,5.2211644268,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),81,4.7978467776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),92,4.5444070504,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),81,4.6539656743,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),80,4.8466090312,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),9,6.1087642052,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),7,5.9063597369,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),14,5.9550781522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),117,3.6730373789,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),132,3.1567232453,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),129,2.7682911669,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),124,3.4065387377,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),125,3.3265829713,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),127,2.8553512999,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),39,5.5089525103,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),35,5.3034127269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),37,5.5371763556,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),76,4.8677532646,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),85,4.5348173113,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),83,4.7477155959,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),32,5.6538215801,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),20,5.6185882415,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),32,5.6237304246,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),93,4.5154692654,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),96,4.2603426847,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),94,4.499330488,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),73,4.8915445008,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),79,4.6812252334,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),88,4.6814441766,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),136,2.5306611254,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),138,2.5372225078,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),138,2.4063305921,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),101,4.2608407691,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),102,4.0118964168,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),97,4.3181537321,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),110,3.8255822088,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),104,3.8351004691,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),117,3.5901191422,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),98,4.3895065053,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),98,4.1777343345,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.05,Pillar 5. Skills (1-7),108,3.8451859912,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",101,1.3333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3333333333,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",84,1.6875,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",88,1.6875,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",92,1.6428571429,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",117,1,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",123,1,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",126,1,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1990,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",109,1.2142857143,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",115,1.2142857143,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",113,1.25,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",85,1.6666666667,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",63,1.9090909091,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1997,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",99,1.3529411765,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3529411765,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",102,1.4,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",95,1.5384615385,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",96,1.5384615385,1997,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",80,1.75,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",107,1.25,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",135,0.5,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",139,0.5,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",127,0.75,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",132,0.75,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",107,1.25,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",113,1.25,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",113,1.25,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",98,1.3571428571,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",103,1.3571428571,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3333333333,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",62,1.9230769231,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",61,1.9230769231,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",63,1.9230769231,2004,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",60,1.9285714286,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",71,1.8571428571,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",74,1.8571428571,2002,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,2003,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",125,0.8,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",130,0.8,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",136,0.8,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",110,1.2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",116,1.2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",118,1.2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",126,0.7777777778,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",131,0.7777777778,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",134,0.875,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3333333333,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",112,1.2666666667,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",112,1.2666666667,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",92,1.5,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CHN,China,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",109,1.2857142857,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CHN,China,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",110,1.2857142857,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",110,1.2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",114,1.2222222222,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",116,1.2222222222,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",97,1.3636363636,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",102,1.3636363636,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",116,1.2222222222,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",64,1.9090909091,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",75,1.8333333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",77,1.8333333333,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",131,0.6666666667,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",91,1.625,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",94,1.625,2009,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",95,1.4,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",107,1.3076923077,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",109,1.3076923077,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",73,1.8125,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",68,1.8666666667,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",69,1.8666666667,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1996,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",66,1.8888888889,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",64,1.8888888889,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",65,1.8823529412,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3076923077,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",107,1.3076923077,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3333333333,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",95,1.4,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",101,1.4,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",103,1.3571428571,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",138,0,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",140,0,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",144,0,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",71,1.8333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",75,1.8333333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,FRA,France,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,FRA,France,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",115,1.2307692308,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",68,1.8571428571,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",71,1.8571428571,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",76,1.8461538462,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",83,1.7222222222,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2000,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",65,1.9,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",100,1.4166666667,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",89,1.6666666667,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",89,1.6666666667,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",91,1.6470588235,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",114,1.125,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",118,1.125,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",122,1.125,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",80,1.75,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",80,1.8,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",80,1.8,2001,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",70,1.8461538462,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",74,1.8461538462,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1996,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",134,0.5,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",135,0.5,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",139,0.5,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1995,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1995,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",67,1.8823529412,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",67,1.875,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",68,1.875,1992,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",75,1.7894736842,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",81,1.7894736842,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",84,1.7647058824,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",60,1.9285714286,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,IND,India,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,IND,India,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",101,1.3333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",105,1.3333333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",110,1.2857142857,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",106,1.2727272727,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",111,1.2727272727,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",84,1.7647058824,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",88,1.6153846154,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",92,1.6153846154,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",89,1.6666666667,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",59,1.9333333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",61,1.9333333333,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",58,1.9411764706,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",58,1.9411764706,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",60,1.9375,2005,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",73,1.8125,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",79,1.8125,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",69,1.8666666667,1997,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2004,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",99,1.3529411765,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",65,1.8823529412,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",65,1.8823529412,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",79,1.7647058824,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",85,1.7647058824,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",87,1.75,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",136,0.2307692308,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",138,0.2307692308,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",142,0.25,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",130,0.9090909091,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",131,0.6666666667,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",134,0.5454545455,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",138,0.5454545455,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",87,1.75,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",87,1.75,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",140,0,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",144,0,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",124,0.8823529412,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",129,0.8823529412,As of 2011,,"National Comminications Commision (NCC), Republic of China", +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",133,0.8823529412,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",85,1.6666666667,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2008,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",62,1.9230769231,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",61,1.9230769231,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",63,1.9230769231,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1997,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",77,1.7692307692,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",83,1.7692307692,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",82,1.7692307692,2003,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1996,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",117,1,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",123,1,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",130,0.9090909091,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",113,1.1875,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",117,1.1875,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",118,1.2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2003,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",144,0,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2004,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",90,1.5555555556,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",94,1.5555555556,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",95,1.5555555556,2011*,Reiterated from GITR 2013,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",30/12/1899 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",105,1.2857142857,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",109,1.2857142857,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",121,1.1666666667,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2004,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2003,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",114,1.125,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",118,1.125,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",122,1.125,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1998,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",130,0.7333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",98,1.4285714286,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",100,1.4285714286,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1996,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",65,1.8823529412,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",65,1.8823529412,1995,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1997,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",101,1.4117647059,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",91,1.5294117647,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",96,1.5294117647,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",97,1.5294117647,1990,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",68,1.8666666667,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",69,1.8666666667,2009,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2003,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",68,1.8571428571,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",77,1.7692307692,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",83,1.7692307692,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",82,1.7692307692,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,,,,29/11/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,1996,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",122,0.9285714286,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",127,0.9285714286,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",128,0.9285714286,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2003,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",89,1.6,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",93,1.6,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",98,1.5,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",59,1.9333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",59,1.9333333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",62,1.9285714286,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",101,1.3333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",105,1.3333333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",104,1.3333333333,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",117,1,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",85,1.7647058824,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",84,1.7647058824,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2000,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",127,0.9285714286,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",129,0.9230769231,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",69,1.8666666667,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",94,1.4285714286,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",98,1.4285714286,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",123,0.9166666667,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",121,1.1,As of 2011,,"National Comminications Commision (NCC), Republic of Taiwan",29/11/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",120,1.1818181818,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",71,1.8333333333,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",77,1.8235294118,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",78,1.8235294118,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2004,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",133,0.5454545455,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",139,0.0833333333,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",143,0.0833333333,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",122,1.0769230769,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",124,1.0769230769,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",137,0.1764705882,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",92,1.5,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",97,1.5,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",98,1.5,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",80,1.75,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",78,1.8181818182,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",79,1.8181818182,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",138,0,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",140,0,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",117,1,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",123,1,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",126,1,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",127,0.75,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",,,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",135,0.8181818182,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2002,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition) Asia-Pacific Telecommunication Indicators 2004 report ,10/11/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",117,1,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",123,1,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",130,0.9090909091,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2006,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",76,1.7777777778,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",71,1.8571428571,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",74,1.8571428571,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",127,0.75,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",132,0.75,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",137,0.75,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,USA,United States,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,,,, +2014,USA,United States,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,2000,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",1,2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",68,1.8666666667,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",69,1.8666666667,2012,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",135,0.4615384615,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",137,0.4615384615,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",141,0.3636363636,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",114,1.125,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",118,1.125,As of 2011,,International Telecommunication Union;ICT-Eye;www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reports.aspx#,29/11/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",125,1.0666666667,2010,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",110,1.2,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",90,1.6363636364,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",93,1.6363636364,2011,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",87,1.6428571429,As of October 2011,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),10/11/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",82,1.7857142857,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETTELCOMPETIDX,"4.03 Internet & telephony competition, 0–2 (best)",81,1.7857142857,2001,0,"ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Database, http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/FocusAreas.aspx?paramWorkArea=TREG",10/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",130,181.7485402125,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",115,57.2178882454,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",39,25.3439531549,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",43,26.3724670867,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",48,26.0503451963,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",94,46.5638513324,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",99,42.8486051243,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",103,41.7683103692,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",93,44.6649628527,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",87,37.301596603,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",79,33.9904826649,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",104,57.388865578,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",85,36.925712115,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",54,28.130745579,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",92,43.7392101425,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",94,40.2352563351,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",101,41.2963032063,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",74,35.0438769264,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",78,35.3261105277,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",87,35.9756241167,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",26,21.7641385733,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",16,18.5524877122,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",18,17.9898387186,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,0,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,BEL,Belgium,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",27,21.8164425975,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",31,22.1268931294,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",64,29.3917585264,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",121,106.1089776902,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",128,107.5844058137,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",132,101.4108320131,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",132,193.5283733477,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",130,119.9962039764,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",131,101.1170180051,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",76,36.2801237806,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",17,18.8668868401,2009,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",3,10.3714834142,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",53,29.4989351633,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",52,29.020309093,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",33,22.3562249676,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",65,32.9674798684,2008,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",74,34.6487710846,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",55,28.2053787344,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",47,28.295257112,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",8,15.6785695738,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",15,15.8468106016,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",129,162.7381004375,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",116,84.396758194,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",110,54.6677845031,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",111,49.6263021059,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",12,17.6010506463,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",11,16.5752308764,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",14,15.7651997567,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",99,50.3885956902,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",105,50.4412525025,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",129,80.3307957958,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",115,81.2425328554,2010,,Authors calculations based on ITU WTI 2011; IMF WEO September 2011,11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",120,81.2017899449,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",122,66.3810094332,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",44,25.6552326256,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",103,54.5473921126,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",104,49.46067813,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",137,114.4762440524,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",29,22.113216405,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",37,24.7061603048,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",75,32.5661291901,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",30,22.507763842,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",36,23.4096768168,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",40,24.4784299045,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",97,49.5792603322,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",39,24.8391346756,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",90,37.1571253547,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",55,30.4076064989,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",51,28.8782255145,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",84,35.4364908953,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",107,65.9556473655,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",111,63.9759089616,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",117,63.1746853118,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",127,160.034331632,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",129,115.2138011254,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",135,112.5298060084,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",101,53.2332610498,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",75,34.8075781908,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",45,25.8480519843,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",81,37.8044734155,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",3,13.5344031508,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",98,40.4136649311,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",4,10.5142372894,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",24,20.4641698098,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",31,21.5861622523,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",22,19.9139250955,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",32,22.9460386496,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",38,23.9227184909,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",91,43.5366553041,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",100,43.2747964215,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",63,29.1971168197,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",77,36.8116260648,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",88,37.3856940033,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",92,37.9277398118,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",58,31.2818466619,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",66,31.8461995545,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",73,32.1855174344,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",67,33.8588963041,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",70,32.5272231626,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",96,39.5108586297,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",42,27.3782701199,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",61,30.2341840133,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",28,20.9406628197,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",85,40.1217002253,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",97,41.9438036329,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",99,41.0552315458,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",15,18.6295627545,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",13,17.2479933363,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",11,15.0944131664,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",45,27.6766958705,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",71,32.8383067026,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",81,34.6323346115,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",59,31.524869486,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",55,29.4515459485,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",61,29.0719439722,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",138,1248.3280563334,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",115,70.619778081,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",114,55.2297123487,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",52,29.3370700428,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",50,28.847363984,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",58,28.9424808437,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",41,25.9961048685,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",46,27.5634956189,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",41,24.5028038224,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",100,41.1478030764,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",35,24.5497918865,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",18,19.0493429201,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",21,19.6757920279,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",111,75.4812652741,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",7,15.2862588167,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",25,20.14746445,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",84,39.8217832533,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",80,35.7104880013,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",104,45.4206028513,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",139,2067.851099716,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",145,2049.8555397184,2010,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",137,958.2875980951,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",136,952.0038038387,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",144,986.5789410166,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",21,19.8537180546,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",26,20.6778292207,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",43,25.1536866937,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",102,53.8379498371,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",101,44.1159886206,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",70,30.7823448106,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",19,19.6311081416,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",109,53.0342842235,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",35,22.8248141311,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",46,27.6877722015,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",62,30.7530539492,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",66,30.0804373006,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",89,42.429075568,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",79,35.3855664659,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",83,34.7081484181,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",40,25.7558063662,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",41,25.8195772609,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",51,26.1853874545,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,0,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",126,72.3161929309,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",64,32.601327799,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",77,34.824168642,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",107,48.5771404807,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",57,31.2644152633,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",57,29.699042903,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",56,28.4773676088,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",6,13.2765338749,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",4,14.7511500795,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",4,13.4450215584,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",48,28.9018816128,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",60,29.8184031415,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",68,30.5606366607,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",112,76.8000580614,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",118,76.8803152344,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",124,69.5216808849,2009,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",28,21.9766327155,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",34,23.231289182,2009,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",50,26.1758688404,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",1,8.0353679355,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",1,8.1096576417,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",2,8.3934581146,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",36,24.5839042355,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",40,25.5130629354,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",46,25.9093319634,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",80,37.455212261,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",98,42.6468491407,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",105,47.0924439264,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",33,23.795303545,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",53,29.1758856275,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",36,22.9504539988,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",14,18.1346083745,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",21,19.855273032,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",23,20.0146106235,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",13,18.0093323564,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",47,27.9984853942,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",8,14.5995047754,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",114,79.8071525913,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",116,71.5962147651,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",119,65.1829068842,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",125,142.64844057,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",131,122.1869575919,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",138,114.6875601178,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",124,125.3073857609,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",119,78.7153639367,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",116,61.54198848,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",68,33.903591036,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",81,36.5201710838,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",88,36.311401713,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",7,14.8905109489,2010,,Authors calculations based on ITU WTI 2011; IMF WEO September 2011,11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",28,21.3305199293,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",30,21.3667600242,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",142,209.7779959941,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",71,34.4570693879,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",42,26.3674823186,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",49,26.0671024645,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,LBY,Libya,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",113,67.4901530184,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",123,66.8901896593,2009,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",3,10.5090160746,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",2,10.9755420037,2011,"National Comminications Commision (NCC), Republic of China","National Comminications Commision (NCC), Republic of China", +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",1,8.2217730623,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",113,78.9090034463,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",123,82.2105814439,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",139,122.2432690982,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",10,17.1675210366,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",10,16.5601044025,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",20,19.1290277785,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",61,31.6568752079,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",64,31.5524700941,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",72,31.6953125217,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",20,19.8381561559,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",20,19.2846754389,2009,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",22,19.7300608638,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",18,19.5573230697,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",23,19.9833541502,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",27,20.6361537624,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",5,12.2418556574,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",29,22.0349488584,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",26,20.4734764004,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",133,204.3451130548,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",121,81.2784255461,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",140,126.4204664785,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",43,27.5284905245,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",49,28.0510318767,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",57,28.5292165059,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",62,32.2416223824,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",67,32.0761667993,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",74,32.4241875226,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",118,88.6152553631,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",122,82.1819735384,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",128,79.5852284255,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",37,24.7057784584,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",38,24.8069850439,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",42,24.8075181945,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",134,108.175235227,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",78,37.0483218063,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",84,36.7991448139,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",89,36.6530956919,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",8,16.0146573483,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",5,14.7812782353,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",5,14.0096510142,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",98,50.3868864431,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",127,107.3870340889,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",133,106.7846888355,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",123,118.9474886665,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",106,51.641776799,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",108,48.9389967837,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",49,28.9820000194,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",33,22.9462069553,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",29,21.3158458946,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",139,1252.3427595972,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",138,1463.3211360683,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",130,84.9009249475,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",75,35.7066411232,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",76,34.8195293542,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",82,34.6541950658,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",122,113.4303029616,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",132,152.9781212064,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",127,78.1826634502,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",120,102.8839075376,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",126,101.967031858,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",120,65.5776147249,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",117,84.9633654114,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",103,46.6629149343,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",106,48.2863697775,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",54,29.8236920314,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",58,29.7352024234,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",69,30.6477036667,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",66,33.1753118335,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",73,33.6497610756,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",77,33.8867725399,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",100,52.6083052278,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",102,46.4443217642,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",9,14.7163597219,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",16,18.6585192427,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",82,36.7156153296,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",113,51.8625797599,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",96,47.8966113257,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",59,29.7431692179,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",59,29.0129815464,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",79,37.374818247,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",68,32.1301899186,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",62,29.1968524612,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",56,30.8931927209,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",45,27.3159335781,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",37,23.9157506077,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",110,75.4005197582,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",107,52.1108566714,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",65,29.7769164308,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",86,40.4011784676,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",95,40.2975577058,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",95,39.3181838156,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",51,29.303780823,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",63,31.518468822,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",71,31.5956034994,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",38,24.95,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,PRT,Portugal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",60,31.5312089139,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",72,33.1872928369,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",78,33.968094771,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",70,34.2187755918,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",69,32.432882501,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",76,32.6340534315,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",109,71.6406747071,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",108,52.817154263,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",112,49.9037051714,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",2,9.184939529,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",12,17.1581479683,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",13,15.7354944143,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",17,18.7120251649,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",9,16.5189262317,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",17,16.2862481441,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",131,186.9159467983,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",134,232.0858822602,2009,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",143,398.8281620033,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",88,42.2716559705,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",65,31.7220190212,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",110,49.3405877934,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",108,66.8618936527,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",114,67.4969036059,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",121,65.7319720162,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",72,34.5121826382,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",86,37.0898190791,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",85,35.5482400068,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",117,71.7641862765,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",125,70.4983888116,2009,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",95,47.2721830758,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",54,29.3898199738,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",60,29.0227030356,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",63,32.4707144742,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",93,40.1617055293,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",97,40.2731212183,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",119,97.1864527537,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",92,40.0829131087,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",94,38.5859856342,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",82,38.0713833029,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",90,37.6207734839,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",93,38.1637587516,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",87,40.7852728672,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",96,41.0599530476,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",102,41.7345118674,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",44,27.5517511427,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",44,26.7002119977,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",53,27.5731287585,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",140,1420.0777897387,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",137,1431.452573893,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",136,113.6661312753,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",125,90.1938912515,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",67,30.5260868357,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",128,161.742662085,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2010,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",34,23.9716872211,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",35,23.2370533225,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",52,26.2755549285,2010,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",73,34.7924278109,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",83,36.7923973891,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",86,35.8052712824,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",136,956.5824808349,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",135,868.8432153276,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",126,146.2167368606,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",133,175.4383521211,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",141,172.2592275823,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",24,20.8585392735,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",19,19.1554983577,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",19,18.7088215212,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",25,21.2823032032,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",7,14.4155435518,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",50,29.2858550432,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",27,20.7984762606,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",24,20.0187541653,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",11,17.5193986421,2010,,"National Communications Commission, R.O.C. via Partner Institute",11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",14,18.0346673464,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",47,26.0476372437,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",105,57.4587865086,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",124,82.3722139568,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",109,49.0270943746,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",69,34.075302428,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",91,38.8792555179,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",80,34.2460392296,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",9,16.7407169852,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",6,15.1013577407,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",6,14.1704636746,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",32,23.1399171403,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",30,22.1077457137,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",12,15.2155194594,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",23,19.95,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",22,19.95,,,, +2014,USA,United States,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",10,14.95,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",31,23.0984381934,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",15,18.2731055062,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",16,16.0372834984,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",90,42.5539219702,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",48,28.0053585763,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",34,22.7923094921,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",135,487.6884624782,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",56,29.6639056414,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",39,24.0779035477,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",83,39.1769256144,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",89,37.4754405923,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",91,37.2496448288,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",106,61.8826294559,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",112,64.6081818062,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",118,64.1415023722,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",134,297.3992673993,2010,,Authors calculations based on ITU WTI 2011; IMF WEO September 2011,11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",25,20.5338809035,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,BBTARIFF,"4.02 Fixed broadband Internet tariffs, PPP $/month",32,21.9298245614,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",80,0.3394421266,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",81,0.278165793,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",96,0.4158262584,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",100,0.3912531925,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",120,0.4352048577,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",15,0.0937527208,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",17,0.0862723593,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",19,0.0840966612,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",132,0.7108837932,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",137,0.8608060755,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",141,0.7732834806,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",31,0.1673841913,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",35,0.165692298,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",63,0.2187874325,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",128,0.6420434516,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",121,0.5369175157,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",26,0.103325582,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",12,0.0820425212,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",15,0.0803403183,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",20,0.0842233244,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",22,0.1450942579,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",28,0.1484199017,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",65,0.2203850648,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",79,0.3337484484,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",126,0.5771545661,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",127,0.5777256692,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",135,0.5890174764,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",89,0.3819923197,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",99,0.3873038609,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",72,0.2433951089,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",137,0.7988884335,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",84,0.3466762442,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",100,0.3447219065,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",2,0.0276920752,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",4,0.0334682167,2009,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",5,0.037337734,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",136,0.7964712494,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",133,0.7835483455,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",142,0.8156917114,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",30,0.1648373993,2008,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",32,0.1559194699,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",32,0.1269220833,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",81,0.339674998,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",83,0.3370892458,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",88,0.3081347192,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",118,0.5336323429,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",117,0.5167148461,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",111,0.458109926,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",126,0.5050175187,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",133,0.7250097204,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",130,0.682754896,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",140,0.6493988396,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",94,0.4016482265,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",104,0.4020679547,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",136,0.5926260631,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",103,0.4480286738,2010,,Authors calculations based on ITU WTI 2011; IMF WEO September 2011,11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",110,0.4478039887,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",111,0.3829656443,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",38,0.1388157682,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",109,0.4933934965,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",101,0.4007806205,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",125,0.4709025657,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",78,0.3274819164,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",92,0.3667384058,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",93,0.3260685518,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",115,0.513044617,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",120,0.5336029274,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",119,0.4319639532,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",60,0.2864634601,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",72,0.2871791847,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",98,0.3436002958,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",26,0.1520380325,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",9,0.0601629698,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",13,0.0685108473,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",66,0.2968004131,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",75,0.3006867721,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",87,0.2969250525,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",97,0.419089906,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",88,0.3575600725,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",103,0.3527846133,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",62,0.2916346739,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",69,0.2825215096,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",79,0.2706064754,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",112,0.4984616296,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",105,0.4196486073,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",122,0.4609333287,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",18,0.0989315108,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",18,0.0948319168,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",22,0.0917167708,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",16,0.0980066879,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",22,0.1195427502,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",29,0.1213602932,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",93,0.399086007,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",114,0.4976601588,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",118,0.4306546151,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",27,0.1536378383,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",33,0.1560337813,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",27,0.1139723852,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",6,0.0615586541,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",10,0.062669228,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",11,0.0633370432,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",104,0.4557145872,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",109,0.4403109576,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",116,0.4177020679,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",43,0.2172839074,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",49,0.1989031096,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",49,0.1778408455,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",92,0.3930573311,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",93,0.3668689645,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",104,0.3590969101,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",13,0.0865929677,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",8,0.0536604237,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",8,0.0469595388,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",134,0.7336410589,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",132,0.75088956,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",40,0.1438778838,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",88,0.3590670463,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",85,0.3469760257,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",99,0.3438634509,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",32,0.1720137085,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",27,0.1461829406,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",28,0.114600492,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",10,0.0719794284,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",13,0.0707779191,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",14,0.071011033,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",121,0.567600543,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",126,0.5742394921,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",124,0.4667261247,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",116,0.5097606497,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",121,0.4594868354,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",68,0.3070643138,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",91,0.3663335177,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",131,0.5297210701,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",71,0.3105514914,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",58,0.2445801411,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",15,0.0780714247,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",20,0.1234475281,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",19,0.095227968,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",18,0.0838533724,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",25,0.1378959829,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",36,0.1366959836,2010,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",107,0.4905909205,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",80,0.319113903,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",102,0.3487543802,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",111,0.4984197001,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",129,0.5877155301,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",137,0.6110047071,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",33,0.1746651044,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",38,0.1704481379,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",114,0.4132445017,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",37,0.1907434352,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",52,0.2090188023,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",31,0.124875396,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",1,0.022449545,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",3,0.0223658574,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",3,0.0214864234,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",77,0.324293379,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",95,0.3720318573,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",107,0.3625302334,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",49,0.234847533,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",56,0.2354290111,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",71,0.2375080189,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,0,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",48,0.1975362159,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",54,0.1839675372,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",69,0.3072768827,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",77,0.313800201,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",78,0.2685849724,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",34,0.1803716265,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",39,0.1713406321,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",45,0.1608616914,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",5,0.0578856877,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",6,0.042056023,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",7,0.038332138,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",83,0.3469613639,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",89,0.3579640233,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",134,0.5500895578,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",50,0.2369410219,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",57,0.2371886287,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",61,0.2144911633,2009,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",23,0.1496932933,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",23,0.12639516,2009,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",33,0.12698402,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",70,0.3080224375,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",74,0.2984234643,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",89,0.3088662177,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",48,0.2341324213,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",71,0.2865781423,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",42,0.1545282612,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",61,0.2880139882,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",61,0.2563769884,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",69,0.2340709545,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",24,0.1498222816,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",29,0.1527699418,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",9,0.0519638026,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",138,0.8079776008,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",136,0.8425151216,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",113,0.3963317561,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",64,0.2933825995,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",42,0.1879898305,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",17,0.0832114245,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",63,0.2927238008,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",20,0.1137398061,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",21,0.0872023164,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",35,0.1840164883,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",31,0.1557883709,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",41,0.1462272742,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",41,0.2109039912,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",51,0.2033471849,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",55,0.1895719302,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",84,0.3481010417,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",82,0.3286815398,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",39,0.1437894422,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",21,0.1350364964,2010,,Authors calculations based on ITU WTI 2011; IMF WEO September 2011,11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",24,0.1358833121,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",35,0.1361194005,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",59,0.209777996,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",119,0.5395614571,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",123,0.5393388958,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",97,0.3431136786,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",1,0.0042617895,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",1,0.0032234528,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",3,0.0445694878,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",5,0.038452491,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from International Monetary Fund's World Economic Outlook (October 2012 edition),"National Comminications Commision (NCC), Republic of China", +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",4,0.0353062038,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",98,0.4201371265,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",125,0.5738725653,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",123,0.4633453395,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",55,0.2584701123,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",60,0.2493249919,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",57,0.1973928003,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",53,0.2503349278,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",59,0.2484213012,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",74,0.2506395589,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",44,0.2213823223,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",54,0.2153224193,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",64,0.2201785345,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",135,0.7704399997,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",90,0.3633337118,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",110,0.3751880806,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",76,0.321348711,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",76,0.308489284,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",82,0.2866245369,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",99,0.4261743,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",103,0.4012479236,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",130,0.5292059547,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",100,0.4297946767,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",102,0.4008947759,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",129,0.5187301919,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",125,0.5759354916,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",106,0.423041265,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",60,0.2111045839,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",91,0.3899071236,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",96,0.3760869975,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",108,0.3642082565,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",122,0.5704075835,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",122,0.5369477282,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",132,0.5369508288,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,MNE,Montenegro,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",116,0.5163990531,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",118,0.5129258927,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",127,0.5108952152,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",19,0.1034279954,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",21,0.1139390197,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",24,0.0996830143,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",114,0.5082357279,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",113,0.4778723017,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",76,0.2591109551,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",110,0.4956145361,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",86,0.3533384728,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",105,0.359205476,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",39,0.201392956,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",47,0.1943814023,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",50,0.1795681987,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",130,0.6723328404,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",138,0.8999904665,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",112,0.385852613,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",36,0.1866483513,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",43,0.1899247056,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",48,0.1732669209,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",58,0.2840491727,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",65,0.2664041119,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",70,0.2350110663,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",101,0.4321124117,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",97,0.3806769189,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",51,0.1803397259,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",127,0.62443617,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",139,0.9629068289,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",144,0.9131418987,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",87,0.3578843044,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",87,0.3568224291,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",106,0.3616868009,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",17,0.098749256,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",7,0.0438909927,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",25,0.1008684813,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",8,0.065954365,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",11,0.0655563657,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",12,0.0674321286,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",120,0.5544601712,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",128,0.5835160293,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",138,0.6154392467,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",51,0.2394830566,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",34,0.1635874307,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",44,0.1595669363,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",4,0.0540126908,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",12,0.0676703604,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",10,0.0553570927,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",47,0.2340227696,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",55,0.2192583297,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",66,0.2211564035,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",141,1.2655452333,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",140,1.2341880926,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",86,0.2968662095,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",65,0.2958672161,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",73,0.2924497431,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",83,0.2879263691,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",73,0.3149222347,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",45,0.1909805526,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",56,0.1914518826,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",25,0.15,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",56,0.2697266996,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",67,0.2687870311,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",85,0.2912953929,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",75,0.3175294518,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",62,0.256392842,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",62,0.2159664688,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",38,0.1970118554,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",26,0.1452471742,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",37,0.1372363245,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",124,0.5755497822,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",124,0.5694730145,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",133,0.537080989,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",42,0.2164294995,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",46,0.1910633887,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",34,0.1357184555,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",102,0.4373833155,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",81,0.321844829,,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",95,0.3278127767,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",46,0.2324941078,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",40,0.1744711046,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",52,0.1821353538,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",74,0.31573672,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",79,0.3187353781,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",91,0.319524723,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",28,0.1537719082,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",37,0.168064884,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",46,0.1610858625,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",2,0.0048012489,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",59,0.2852303886,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",63,0.2600869024,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",75,0.25683808,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",40,0.207965503,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",41,0.1823602709,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",68,0.2339297561,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",54,0.2576745959,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",44,0.1903272227,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",53,0.1839233999,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",139,0.8209202386,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",134,0.8188718939,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",73,0.2496931906,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",57,0.2823595814,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",70,0.2842612134,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",84,0.2889283541,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",11,0.0763482261,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",14,0.0770842941,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",16,0.0795999499,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",108,0.4920729465,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",112,0.4734683265,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",109,0.3720041092,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",131,0.741594217,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",139,0.6173607443,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",140,1.0917629691,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2010,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",129,0.6703946426,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",135,0.8278660871,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",143,0.87820912,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",14,0.08712628,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",16,0.0861070571,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",30,0.1213747571,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",7,0.0617294632,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",66,0.2664071842,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",86,0.3544648166,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",107,0.4253050961,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",115,0.4175981275,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",82,0.3432417855,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",78,0.3152170616,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",96,0.3404344686,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",72,0.312140447,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",,,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",94,0.3267235129,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",95,0.4039428282,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",36,0.1658603846,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",58,0.2075330843,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",113,0.5007274491,2010,,"National Communications Commission, R.O.C. via Partner Institute",11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",119,0.52619169,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",90,0.3189721055,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",131,0.7038701347,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",98,0.3866002575,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",92,0.3216305191,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",106,0.4843479442,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",64,0.2644697388,2010,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",67,0.2329542634,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",9,0.0697529874,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",2,0.0125844648,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",6,0.0380834514,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",90,0.3886319417,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",94,0.3712967549,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",101,0.3460403999,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",52,0.25,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",68,0.27,,,, +2014,USA,United States,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",80,0.27219,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",123,0.5740236872,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",115,0.5094320323,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",77,0.2646198679,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",67,0.2971548108,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",53,0.2142409931,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",23,0.0947926391,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",45,0.2275879492,2009,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",50,0.2022392261,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",43,0.1545972293,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",85,0.349442427,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",117,0.5098731427,2011,Authors calculation for PPP $ estimates based on PPP data from World Bank's World Development Indicators Online Database (retrieved 29/11/2012),International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",128,0.5144612489,2012,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",105,0.477489823,2010,,Authors' calculations based on International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (December edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",108,0.4335675423,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",117,0.4304333543,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",29,0.1648351648,2010,,Authors calculations based on ITU WTI 2011; IMF WEO September 2011,11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",30,0.1540041068,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBTELTARIFF,"4.01 Mobile cellular tariffs, PPP $/min.",47,0.1644736842,2011,0,Author's calculation based on International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2013 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,18/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),121,3.0397101232,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),110,4.0722281922,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),57,5.4274987897,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),66,5.2889685386,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),87,5.0734719233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),92,4.703447638,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),89,4.7003966457,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),85,5.0901122562,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),103,3.9285005552,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),114,3.2875925497,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),121,3.6944854514,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),97,4.1853589965,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),77,4.9734396629,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),63,5.4487193888,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),100,3.9748783527,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),97,4.0714494275,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),49,5.8269229561,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),24,5.9900033987,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),37,5.8921770381,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),34,6.0862978879,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),25,5.9807776052,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),20,6.1564424206,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),40,5.9916455286,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),43,5.6605729144,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),68,5.2544120506,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),70,5.1961723396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),101,4.5878913225,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),125,2.9087323023,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),133,2.3898157992,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),134,2.820154264,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),139,1.8284399102,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),129,2.5903456577,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),131,3.0971247201,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),58,5.407975947,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),13,6.34375,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),23,6.34375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),98,4.1246627696,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),106,3.7562513506,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),119,3.7384862616,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),31,5.8318310999,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),46,5.6430752895,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),25,6.2868043043,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),45,5.6378200366,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),31,5.9914794622,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),30,6.1208215666,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),131,2.8304062902,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),136,2.4418072885,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),122,2.8949121049,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),126,3.3643490546,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),67,5.2683363815,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),76,5.0051828462,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),91,4.9730517865,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),102,3.9699231967,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),111,3.4786037456,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),144,1.9879581691,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),135,2.5793582725,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),135,2.3295380436,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),129,3.1197244486,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),45,5.8871962246,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),101,3.9702689639,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),109,3.5738972525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),142,2.3903651712,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),21,6.0332241466,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),43,5.6927288412,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),65,5.4105875767,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),48,5.5491115596,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),68,5.2504551847,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),66,5.3955106716,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),89,4.7402095866,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),33,5.9359452024,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),81,5.1326888183,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),42,5.6723733763,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),40,5.8157917773,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),60,5.5656815226,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),108,3.4940220734,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),119,2.9647479314,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),120,3.6982941875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),129,2.8689279979,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),125,2.7940896353,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),136,2.7691608987,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),95,4.4900020304,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),67,5.2861400234,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),44,5.9272131634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),86,4.8083300394,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),42,5.7171860112,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),106,4.4537977119,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),35,5.7646075145,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),6,6.5165697945,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),15,6.4379592901,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),14,6.2149432364,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),28,6.0227289569,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),39,5.9989378227,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),93,4.6538985059,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),99,3.9726643101,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),84,5.0948405634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),38,5.7211317671,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),53,5.5150387075,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),43,5.9440871664,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),18,6.1349843329,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),22,6.0943259156,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),29,6.1702269174,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),75,5.1157154723,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),79,4.9382119374,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),95,4.749985042,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),51,5.5184832583,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),64,5.3492085634,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),42,5.9559255873,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),81,4.9541884849,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),91,4.5431389477,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),92,4.8944779844,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),12,6.3017125223,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),8,6.4735683688,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),16,6.4375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),90,4.7347902736,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),102,3.9334128251,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),41,5.9868008335,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),54,5.4760125411,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),56,5.4389863848,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),61,5.5072138419,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),132,2.8010709073,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),126,2.7789728298,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),115,3.8536674397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),16,6.1737849956,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),19,6.2220085268,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),18,6.4129345311,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),69,5.23542678,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),86,4.844778035,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),72,5.2661273754,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),96,4.1066212168,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),109,4.0852046131,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),27,5.8540419563,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),35,5.9004743865,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),79,5.1567793635,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),116,3.2706493706,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),11,6.3935281406,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),4,6.8213969383,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),46,5.5731361312,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),59,5.395050897,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),64,5.4123308811,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),108,3.5760726945,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),122,3.6941164155,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),133,2.6166977045,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),124,2.8120325296,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),137,2.7451265372,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),49,5.541775868,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),73,5.1295958864,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),102,4.586008412,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),91,4.7110363944,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),81,4.9241293311,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),78,5.1718046178,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),66,5.2823119503,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),110,3.496933132,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),70,5.3667892345,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),5,6.4040135034,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),17,6.2831297367,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),22,6.3600850066,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),80,5.0089153925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),78,4.9639962675,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),77,5.1765854116,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),19,6.0798029954,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),26,6.0345514401,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),36,6.0336596791,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),24,6.0851711832,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),108,4.0887623651,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),55,5.4692055265,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),74,5.1048981456,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),94,4.8028403941,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),34,5.7799234234,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),39,5.8216411047,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),37,6.0273460006,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),1,6.9375,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),1,7,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),1,7,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),44,5.6395654741,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),61,5.3797140545,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),98,4.6772261077,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),114,3.2746886022,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),115,3.1322022919,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),118,3.739331652,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),4,6.4847873414,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),5,6.552574895,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),13,6.441868211,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),32,5.8132940179,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),44,5.6572063399,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),35,6.0461924918,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),28,5.8458906892,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),49,5.6096075274,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),32,6.0879325945,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),61,5.3523751247,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),87,4.8059738594,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),89,5.0330700205,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),9,6.3450546464,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),27,6.0280484455,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),6,6.6389439918,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),78,5.0337349766,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),92,4.498986734,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),54,5.734282704,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),15,6.1787370437,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),36,5.898047564,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),2,6.8833333333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),109,3.4328830559,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),105,3.808092333,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),97,4.7298391283,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),106,3.7047440261,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),107,3.6748625508,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),116,3.8294494198,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),110,3.343292595,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),112,3.4723476043,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),105,4.5012830446,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),70,5.2242591938,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),83,4.877895302,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),57,5.724486236,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),62,5.3173663199,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),71,5.1787271199,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),76,5.1808680948,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),130,3.104760493,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),99,4.0630271914,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),95,4.1196222696,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),99,4.62234465,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),3,6.78125,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),5,6.78125,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),141,1,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),145,1.7258230133,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),22,6.0220588235,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),29,6.0220588235,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),38,6.0220588235,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),123,2.984481057,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),134,2.3501736742,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),138,2.6594762609,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),6,6.3950239502,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),14,6.3171625292,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),12,6.4467852073,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),36,5.7412281158,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),48,5.6111928519,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),56,5.7293176615,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),13,6.2291392786,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),16,6.2991276677,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),26,6.2128560785,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),77,5.0553204703,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),30,6.0172605458,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),51,5.7834240245,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),8,6.3612963733,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),25,6.0553704291,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),31,6.1177248802,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),117,3.0991430216,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),121,2.8971303537,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),141,2.4164905706,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),52,5.502195865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),63,5.3615138344,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),93,4.8872673294,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),96,4.285082463,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),94,4.3951258161,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),88,5.0447823699,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),130,2.8658735691,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),128,2.6745155516,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),135,2.7775723135,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),65,5.2939704305,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),72,5.1467033887,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),90,4.9928891537,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),146,1,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),87,4.8018925157,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),93,4.4233386307,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),103,4.5388805092,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),3,6.5199042072,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),10,6.4292688447,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),7,6.6111111111,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),105,3.7745036147,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),132,2.4173526502,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),132,3.0574587073,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),124,2.9254832231,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),101,3.9394784135,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),104,4.5279358022,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),23,5.999539662,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),12,6.3561677395,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),11,6.4735760494,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),138,2.2118999481,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),140,1.1728441136,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),139,2.6232267297,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),41,5.6947234731,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),50,5.5787338403,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),48,5.8773578729,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),126,2.9076023273,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),117,3.086923782,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),125,3.3688471748,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),118,3.0842926792,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),120,2.9623090459,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),107,4.4151030963,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),134,2.6033192989,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),136,2.3055893034,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),140,2.477577512,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),47,5.5654100789,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),60,5.3888778806,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),69,5.3682743054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),20,6.0431672376,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),23,6.0900159283,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),28,6.180105175,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),74,5.137759499,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),69,5.1978055242,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),9,6.4852941176,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),63,5.3092931047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),100,3.9578769452,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),127,3.2440567303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),82,4.9431988663,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),34,5.900596705,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),33,6.0867295597,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),26,5.911798476,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),21,6.1453828434,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),19,6.4011208813,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),39,5.7168830768,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),32,5.9860307349,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),27,6.1993947866,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),141,1,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),138,1.8592762219,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),59,5.6478644617,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),72,5.183045884,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),82,4.88868404,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),75,5.2377268889,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),50,5.5348674403,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),47,5.6282824133,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),52,5.7806135987,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),11,6.3329385435,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),40,5.6991174668,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),57,5.4376763845,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),62,5.4737686604,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),56,5.443010065,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),52,5.5272410721,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),50,5.8136428566,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),111,3.3282583446,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),103,3.9150341255,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),100,4.5919659472,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),37,5.7255769513,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),62,5.3641135363,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),68,5.3874364743,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),17,6.1595815936,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),18,6.2349398473,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),14,6.4389567952,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),119,3.0455183343,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),116,3.1224776817,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),128,3.1312992415,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),85,4.8092830464,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),65,5.3480156227,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),96,4.7323523328,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),112,3.315236701,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),118,3.0656701098,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),117,3.7798842639,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),29,5.8376350484,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),55,5.4966434672,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),46,5.8807769162,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),141,1,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),114,3.8794975481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),84,4.8605197747,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),41,5.718407373,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),55,5.7333953127,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),59,5.3911327492,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),84,4.871802442,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),67,5.3925919483,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),120,3.043796709,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),90,4.6385775245,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),86,5.0770425603,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),104,3.9052558841,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),113,3.3241995088,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),71,5.3125661569,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),71,5.1973100085,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),85,4.8638028269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),82,5.1218098959,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),7,6.3849314461,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),7,6.4775535679,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),10,6.4765306432,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),137,2.4008238138,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),137,2.0290212278,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),143,2.2785656937,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),139,1.6088959919,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),113,3.9194130556,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),140,1.1075985497,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),88,4.7636418127,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),98,4.0589983719,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),123,3.4365693215,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),33,5.8028766484,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),45,5.6448766185,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),47,5.8786371268,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),122,3,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),131,2.4932772922,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),113,3.2784778729,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),123,2.8209058295,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),133,2.8282557031,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),64,5.3003678716,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),58,5.3985022861,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),74,5.251009621,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),73,5.1585280244,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),73,5.2530067045,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),53,5.4775528954,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),4,6.5897178872,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),17,6.4306427588,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),30,5.8333821688,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),54,5.5012492851,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),53,5.7395041131,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),128,2.8839694471,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),130,2.5755984642,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),111,4.0266813247,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),79,5.0331117081,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),75,5.0718914339,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),58,5.676103582,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),2,6.7576754692,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),2,6.875,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),3,6.875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),83,4.917483473,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),80,4.9372144905,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),80,5.140344611,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),10,6.3369116496,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),15,6.3129859799,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),21,6.3647234255,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),60,5.3665987376,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),51,5.5543518239,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),20,6.3926526176,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),76,5.0704412978,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),38,5.8567002625,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),8,6.5869210356,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),127,2.9042824108,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),88,4.7519961869,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),83,5.1206805286,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),94,4.5522235194,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),104,3.9079955287,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),112,3.9732499275,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),115,3.2735934163,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),127,2.6926273471,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),124,3.3973285005,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),107,3.5851818286,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),9,6.4669348524,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.04,Pillar 4. Affordability (1-7),24,6.326623693,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),137,3.2170111281,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),135,3.529412,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),87,4.6957245183,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),108,4.2154923188,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),116,4.1008981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),30,5.9323940206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),23,6.0860496188,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),20,6.126701,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),88,4.6921103684,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),86,4.7864712162,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),88,4.7384773656,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),101,4.4336579267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),75,4.9405847221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),64,5.265605641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),24,6.0554416462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),20,6.1498913143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),22,6.098015504,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),4,6.4393236794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),9,6.3447270397,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),15,6.2261722426,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),81,4.8051299301,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),71,4.9807455791,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),50,5.4079520139,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),142,2.4344834087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),142,2.7831297337,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),146,2.6376723762,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),10,6.3387901944,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),15,6.2031485205,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),26,6.013177629,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),116,3.9454877143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),128,3.5771695769,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),141,3.1509308733,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),130,3.5246367342,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),136,3.2972581926,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),147,2.6236975745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),112,4.0490394804,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),115,3.9949213581,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),117,3.9706978994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),54,5.2334109909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),72,4.9801503537,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),65,5.2245639403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),19,6.0922912667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),31,5.9412384483,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),38,5.7213825377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),66,4.996726,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),45,5.4348923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),36,5.793392,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),113,4.034033,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),122,3.6386527948,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),129,3.5742241212,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),130,3.6979656466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),71,4.9324078204,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),82,4.8561645909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),92,4.702657473,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),28,6.0134762487,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),28,5.9781798835,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),28,5.955023122,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),51,5.2898565144,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),46,5.3929926111,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),48,5.4543417795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),90,4.729097,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),107,4.3143820018,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),103,4.3552369093,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),103,4.519714594,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),14,6.2454247032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),16,6.191724596,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),21,6.1064620186,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),1,6.5800236292,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),4,6.4330263621,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),7,6.3743738633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),49,5.327238366,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),55,5.2412524667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),46,5.472209475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),37,5.6298647617,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),51,5.3190103088,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),67,5.1715161667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),132,3.4171339738,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),134,3.4040918089,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),131,3.657428778,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),135,3.3471358597,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),127,3.5989662138,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),129,3.6991103902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),89,4.6628489169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),94,4.5663003998,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),91,4.7209103918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),103,4.3844160709,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),101,4.3928564031,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),104,4.5002496234,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),77,4.8417445957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),56,5.199387358,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),47,5.4583420529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),43,5.4356105196,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),42,5.5094231404,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),40,5.625274731,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),23,6.0590029065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),21,6.1270306604,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),19,6.1496428869,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),22,6.0706155239,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),22,6.121038486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),25,6.0794516,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),7,6.37327375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),17,6.1873425578,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),29,5.9546210292,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),68,4.9751302062,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),78,4.909607,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),60,5.2915507,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),126,3.5832729652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),137,3.2578173958,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),144,2.9840270949,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),110,4.1231610224,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),109,4.194356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),97,4.5832170024,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),100,4.4741067113,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),100,4.4008413036,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),89,4.729357418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),38,5.6175080607,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),36,5.6392848773,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),34,5.83667652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),11,6.337351975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),11,6.3138691006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),6,6.4137615831,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),139,3.0707315375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),140,3.034971425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),142,3.0753040861,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),17,6.1925065809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),5,6.4034568565,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),2,6.4905498684,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),40,5.546173903,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),38,5.5733986521,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),41,5.6187638297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),144,2.469865,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),143,3.0302338673,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),5,6.4349709231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),1,6.4978887615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),4,6.4275909545,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),76,4.8509079676,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),70,5.003031,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),71,5.1065102538,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),118,3.9296487538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),111,4.1523793816,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),114,4.1726016356,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),143,2.59541,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),145,2.7114551966,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),90,4.6388060873,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),79,4.8998070584,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),81,4.861610138,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),65,5.017046833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),64,5.0971373982,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),69,5.1254419316,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),63,5.0966330313,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),80,4.8739003578,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),74,5.068461413,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),92,4.6117736529,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),76,4.9342823538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),68,5.1474925895,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),16,6.2285347226,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),18,6.1815033625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),10,6.2845732442,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),99,4.4771654807,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),104,4.3247173702,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),107,4.4795469248,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),46,5.3889267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),47,5.3848629029,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),42,5.5572599898,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),140,2.9523,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),138,3.0566556404,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),138,3.4622633076,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),21,6.0802947779,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),26,5.9986515804,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),24,6.0907239079,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),67,4.9956169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),81,4.8567939368,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),80,4.8712178057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),85,4.756130943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),91,4.6489707135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),84,4.8311042638,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),44,5.4183573546,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),41,5.5351687387,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),49,5.4140873333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),119,3.8650921329,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),114,4.0039109378,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),123,3.8714894367,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),3,6.5328688891,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),3,6.4886172914,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),1,6.5515255043,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),29,6.0035996964,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),33,5.7818005908,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),37,5.7349381514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),72,4.9270982088,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),87,4.7632642939,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),98,4.5790243058,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),61,5.1228137814,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),59,5.1658086664,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),56,5.3350621066,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),50,5.308709827,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),48,5.3667831238,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),54,5.34423,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),12,6.320835405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),13,6.2631414778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),13,6.2412027903,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),78,4.83071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),67,5.0578450356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),59,5.2945100905,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),96,4.5245260537,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),88,4.7381373185,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),79,4.8922897321,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),58,5.2110633809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),58,5.1713739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),78,4.9093272125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),106,4.3548921514,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),92,4.6237526045,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),86,4.8073573676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),15,6.2375895056,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),10,6.3160774,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),14,6.2368727151,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),70,4.9638292453,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),54,5.2631255598,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),51,5.3919671892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),77,4.966496,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),94,4.5493599065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),110,4.1920226233,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),115,4.1689096571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),122,3.753492,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),136,3.509717427,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),131,3.494272,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),139,3.3912016,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),97,4.5053306207,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),99,4.430572,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),95,4.6468123805,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),136,3.238152974,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),135,3.3518308935,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),128,3.7047312188,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),18,6.1687550587,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),24,6.0848140864,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),23,6.0971820541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),20,6.0847235446,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),6,6.3556135875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),8,6.3670155794,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),45,5.4015595127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),39,5.5605737825,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),31,5.9293446359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),93,4.608834,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),96,4.4890050015,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),99,4.5479714393,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),73,4.8894904577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),66,5.0631648545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),52,5.3902709744,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),131,3.5240052065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),123,3.7154234382,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),127,3.7556571446,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),82,4.7916324821,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),84,4.8141523453,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),94,4.6588003833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),53,5.2483721696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),60,5.1492411196,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),53,5.3771918608,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),128,3.5475145086,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),130,3.5470727221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),132,3.6566814643,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),27,6.0227479778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),19,6.1771775818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),11,6.2635337,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),121,3.922317,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),47,5.3868542745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),52,5.2980938039,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),57,5.3094234416,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),55,5.2277911364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),50,5.3398443018,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),72,5.0893767947,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),123,3.6341265355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),125,3.6584446552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),125,3.8120697556,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),129,3.5248307267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),124,3.6753161588,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),126,3.7804419706,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),75,4.8549814405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),83,4.8467906661,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),76,5.0010128167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),109,4.2246210467,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),113,4.101701544,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),119,3.9541805078,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),36,5.6562516893,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),40,5.5500438139,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),44,5.5074010703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),95,4.5434377949,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),105,4.3067989624,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),106,4.4867761528,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),108,4.2646616217,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),93,4.5840596729,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),102,4.5242794113,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),115,3.9644651494,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),116,3.9517365529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),113,4.1807308377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),6,6.3943439597,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),2,6.4935729586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),5,6.4233101112,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),8,6.3547330235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),8,6.3511119393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),3,6.4340971531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),125,3.62038843,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),119,3.8293326154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),118,3.95980725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),31,5.9178934191,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),32,5.8971717368,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),32,5.9087210891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),41,5.4545864976,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),53,5.2908654405,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),75,5.058872,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),86,4.7103066034,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),97,4.4480887125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),93,4.6700833458,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),62,5.1070275129,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),69,5.011474227,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),58,5.3018285734,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),91,4.6359301759,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),102,4.3589296187,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),108,4.4196344537,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),80,4.8230253714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),74,4.9452822133,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),73,5.074864504,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),69,4.964448743,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),73,4.965847401,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),70,5.1145934498,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),35,5.6956009899,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),30,5.9489556358,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),30,5.9363046414,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),25,6.0543949766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),29,5.9626731801,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),27,5.9947443372,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),117,3.9423796954,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),106,4.2896973172,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),109,4.3614748986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),33,5.786273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),27,5.9853873621,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),18,6.1551889882,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),57,5.2195623381,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),57,5.1884279604,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),55,5.3373140647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),59,5.1536412019,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),63,5.1002996212,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),66,5.2221139763,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),104,4.3765219767,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),95,4.564386,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),105,4.495827719,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),42,5.436014,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),43,5.4753055692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),39,5.6477083671,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),64,5.0170934304,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),77,4.9328738283,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),96,4.5832262385,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),9,6.3530131766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),7,6.3514588121,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),9,6.3409753134,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),139,3.040232,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),137,3.4699426,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),74,4.8861435429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),68,5.0519714242,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),85,4.8248164308,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),102,4.4219023391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),107,4.2234256,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),101,4.5354964291,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),111,4.084965,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),112,4.1193561239,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),120,3.9368065874,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),39,5.5636051786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),37,5.6345309384,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),35,5.8091924725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),34,5.767084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),34,5.7600028199,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),33,5.9076177529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),2,6.5777845986,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),14,6.2502646807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),12,6.2498377361,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),127,3.5519964526,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),117,3.9339387868,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),122,3.9157483928,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),65,5.079509,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),83,4.8358827397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),121,3.7239062214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),141,2.6239632222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),141,2.8749969385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),148,2.5038905986,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),84,4.7572553421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),90,4.6753064808,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),82,4.848714623,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),98,4.4909387347,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),89,4.7207506859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),138,3.2006190918,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),132,3.4684244939,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),140,3.3479113696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),56,5.2271872429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),61,5.1245467865,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),62,5.2704601809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),79,4.828275391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),110,4.3211457599,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),52,5.2577643349,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),62,5.1089853372,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),63,5.2667293458,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),13,6.2562087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),12,6.2770904145,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),16,6.2241192539,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),134,3.3807424517,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),133,3.4456955026,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),134,3.6346376309,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),124,3.6213644681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),120,3.7638740793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),133,3.6469504984,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),60,5.14142905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),44,5.439117477,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),43,5.5349432235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),32,5.8312399509,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),35,5.6949985767,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),45,5.5013599913,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),26,6.0238578205,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),25,6.0430860591,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),17,6.1703843342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),105,4.3683551205,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),98,4.4387866857,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),100,4.5443312355,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),48,5.34468678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),49,5.347532,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),61,5.2811991951,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),114,3.970361,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),121,3.7592818762,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),124,3.825163132,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),83,4.7716729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),85,4.8090451971,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),87,4.7855060174,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),120,3.8181808,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),118,3.9304717077,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),111,4.2742152849,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),133,3.4069684667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),126,3.6199092,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ085,3.05 Accessibility of digital content (1-7),112,4.1886124694,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,104,2.7250937956,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,110,3.4581260559,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,90,8.4262193988,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,87,13.6816430907,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,85,18.9748339939,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,40,152.4290805398,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,40,180.3337606597,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,40,183.6915173082,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,63,26.0811193086,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,64,33.6076230528,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,62,41.7894480159,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,72,17.4640176555,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,67,27.7398236779,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,72,26.9443642662,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,5,1760.8201067679,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,6,2002.6436080387,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,8,1724.461725652,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,18,856.5555660906,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,20,993.2295997149,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,16,1134.6601207263,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,99,5.0840346722,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,100,4.6902268761,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,101,6.4533428154,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,138,0.2385823722,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,143,0.1166157367,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,144,0.3045818553,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,23,489.8356573334,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,23,599.5639534884,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,22,673.567963546,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,140,0.1129957292,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,131,0.7692373627,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,137,0.6964687641,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,137,0.2428847814,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,134,0.5893500324,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,139,0.6075282101,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,134,0.3160893565,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,133,0.637900635,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,136,0.7304678961,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,51,73.4424143199,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,46,139.1118245051,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,43,164.1424236019,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,47,97.4770869408,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,48,117.8661690095,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,45,135.8296650471,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,73,15.9568144773,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,75,20.2546327142,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,74,25.8221619879,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,30,301.7116333043,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,92,7.9558108084,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,91,9.516155061,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,94,9.7177239376,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,58,40.7342589994,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,58,54.1964315235,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,59,54.2847886225,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,27,329.2711035338,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,29,401.569772748,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,30,374.2660325329,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,53,65.1759751329,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,50,113.3177972991,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,50,111.5860255483,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,88,12.1322904956,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,89,8.4705858905,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,93,8.8637726777,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,89,11.4775613675,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,14,1238.919559414,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,15,1368.6251911425,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,15,1233.4402058733,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,4,1867.5458385126,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,5,2137.473125079,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,4,2282.1874587353,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,55,52.8232137924,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,56,67.4598751268,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,54,82.1652037061,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,110,1.9196001926,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,111,2.4253606422,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CHN,China,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,111,3.1376439537,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,118,1.063948363,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,129,0.9427926332,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,125,1.4617119671,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,129,0.5612563039,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,125,1.0484084112,,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,130,1.1981770566,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,76,14.3212501799,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,73,21.2243984689,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,70,28.4459972656,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,79,14.1129316793,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,84,15.9813018768,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,75,24.2717955668,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,45,107.7510572804,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,51,111.2856561041,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,52,94.8953186017,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,19,838.1303079698,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,18,1121.2971222429,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,20,786.5409382158,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,28,318.1920534646,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,30,387.1610089133,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,27,518.6018577606,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,17,872.827015739,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,19,1023.4074835426,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,18,1090.9167863915,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,3,1873.3296549744,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,4,2180.6602081091,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,5,2214.3008164955,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,74,15.2105502794,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,74,20.286031049,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,78,22.9647468755,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,123,0.8740221666,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,128,0.9449643586,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,128,1.2733323536,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,75,14.5871971834,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,77,19.7053672579,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,79,22.1400823017,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,106,2.2928689667,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,105,3.0047214108,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,107,3.7040765431,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,32,233.4121659994,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,32,284.7193684438,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,32,294.4093531084,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,25,434.4431290057,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,25,532.8358208955,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,23,659.9989846169,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,139,0.1326107398,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,142,0.1770240236,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,145,0.1962305229,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,13,1245.4265996274,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,13,1486.7273064786,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,10,1612.5835820115,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,31,297.102414789,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,31,354.0987306299,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,FRA,France,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,28,408.9551605866,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,94,8.4731291005,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,90,11.0255474184,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,10,1396.3312448475,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,11,1592.5352404974,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,12,1478.2802034671,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,85,11.9026230686,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,79,18.7249219795,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,73,25.9320005319,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,111,1.7218885198,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,112,2.2030123109,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,114,2.9566598606,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,138,0.489150256,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,143,0.4366326783,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,103,2.8928589199,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,107,2.8151520492,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,106,3.9079400969,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,44,124.2153933794,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,43,154.3701344657,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,42,168.3485714352,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,88,9.9381962341,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,86,13.8236519432,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,86,14.1220172791,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,97,6.626966718,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,92,9.2587693773,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,102,6.2863903421,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,24,453.4650103285,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,24,570.4508173539,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,24,636.6533419059,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,91,8.2889021862,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,96,7.737256191,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,95,9.4507882335,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,37,168.6195239752,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,35,224.6426140231,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,36,245.1370986642,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,120,1.0006757563,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,122,1.1853271903,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,123,1.6709628432,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,38,166.0554819141,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,37,219.9378196771,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,35,247.1903219659,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,109,2.0010761037,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,103,3.3838763689,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,105,3.9495400125,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,107,2.2212960891,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,106,2.8554353264,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IND,India,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,108,3.5675971011,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,16,997.8957609513,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,17,1154.4461778471,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,19,1003.0949281272,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,126,0.7435081934,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,126,1.0160618115,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,127,1.3477363518,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,1,2529.9466285232,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,1,3025.078369906,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,1,3139.2809953239,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,26,396.6109697558,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,27,470.1443527306,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,29,396.4390040339,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,39,154.4222268409,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,39,190.8672042126,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,39,208.0666564475,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,60,39.2258446509,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,61,48.3519728343,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,60,51.2517975001,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,70,19.844551017,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,71,25.2386345252,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,69,29.2814181703,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,20,649.8446584645,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,21,743.9291638172,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,21,750.0461208947,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,98,5.2095942339,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,98,6.3411697912,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,98,7.3820689189,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,105,2.5917810132,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,104,3.1723350847,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,103,4.168776048,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,117,1.1183248249,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,109,2.542218994,2010,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,104,4.1203131438,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,112,1.6975220775,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,110,2.5165703927,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,113,2.9600435826,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,15,1140.4398976982,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,3,2496.1329074509,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,3,2751.55987521,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,41,138.8517399585,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,41,179.2024391404,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,41,179.0495973538,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,133,0.902822177,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,61,28.621460371,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,62,41.0855506814,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,61,48.5888004397,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,121,1.2110724967,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,131,1.1931935467,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,119,1.4012641271,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,121,1.787274379,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,100,4.4103655287,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,99,6.0376635201,2010,,"National Information & Communication Security Taskforce, Republic of China", +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,97,7.6741440378,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,131,0.4605497675,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,139,0.4605497675,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,141,0.4977796539,2010, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,34,175.8688644653,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,34,241.9606618795,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,34,272.9852765475,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,9,1415.4925261599,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,7,1874.2746615087,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,6,1983.2869500095,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,36,172.9890909869,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,38,205.8558558559,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,33,274.5037825733,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,102,2.9732645305,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,102,4.3070093261,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,109,3.566910302,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,81,13.4753409682,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,78,19.6684461928,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,77,23.0366780436,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,130,0.482769498,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,136,0.5160652278,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,140,0.538263492,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,67,20.6042780706,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,69,26.822113314,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,71,28.0684386981,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,65,24.2652129539,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,66,28.5867532861,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,63,39.4191610368,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,127,0.7156887896,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,127,0.9469973177,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,132,1.0098581001,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,11,1380.2756192473,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,9,1661.0978520286,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,9,1627.7613381585,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,146,0.0947017783,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,64,25.3369016136,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,70,25.3060049568,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,67,30.5918229667,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,86,10.5224925535,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,88,13.5708760429,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,84,19.309962081,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,125,0.8550383025,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,123,1.1283046162,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,124,1.5077333827,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,108,2.0232541268,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,113,1.9765412787,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,120,1.8439778712,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,48,86.6365806181,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,49,116.6361209625,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,46,134.7316517171,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,136,0.2684412242,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,141,0.3900945121,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,134,0.8801442783,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,57,41.47738794,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,57,54.4368001917,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,57,65.6636386267,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,80,14.0148706537,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,76,19.7934254846,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,82,19.9168537744,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,115,1.2056316354,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,115,1.692612498,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,122,1.7413577245,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,93,7.774487346,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,89,10.0513487632,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,93,10.3475905886,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,2,2277.1198515213,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,2,2749.8203162434,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,2,2803.722990117,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,6,1652.5288419812,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,8,1810.5815831987,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,7,1878.9093718127,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,113,1.5020345559,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,114,1.9353273941,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,116,2.4750333738,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,7,1489.5370667155,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,10,1597.4303096341,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,14,1466.017008414,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,62,27.6736024382,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,60,53.4055713957,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,58,56.1255111269,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,121,0.9735394119,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,124,1.1145978347,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,129,1.2726047038,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,43,126.8191149959,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,44,143.0897587215,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,47,133.8670129851,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,77,14.238296533,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,80,18.6395718041,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,80,21.6754813624,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,95,6.6694689874,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,97,7.5485996452,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,96,8.624008968,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,33,210.7758436481,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,33,269.6776219385,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,31,299.6154632194,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,50,83.6956374215,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,52,105.4849474868,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,49,112.8962412642,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,35,173.5438873887,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,36,223.7472971703,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,37,240.9111380838,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,96,6.6619692037,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,90,9.7437841508,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,91,10.9161147424,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,49,85.2857613147,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,47,126.2004415946,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,44,140.9402715612,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,59,39.8283519289,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,59,53.6699392239,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,56,66.5825631989,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,68,20.3456790123,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,68,27.1260480519,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,64,38.9457476678,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,128,0.6588852321,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,130,0.9138303657,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,119,2.0073659858,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,71,17.4875581489,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,72,21.5436345308,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,68,30.5431429849,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,116,1.1259696207,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,118,1.4098234619,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,118,2.1127754358,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,21,529.6747887407,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,22,607.2882304146,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,25,635.3060763497,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,132,0.6669461171,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,138,0.6690387435,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,82,13.402243471,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,82,16.8607228818,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,81,20.6434598185,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,69,19.8832401289,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,65,28.9216361383,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,65,37.6528591879,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,66,20.9669180155,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,63,33.9995353397,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,66,37.4152777804,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,42,127.5431327685,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,42,163.7867647059,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,38,226.2365240015,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,29,302.9976797782,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,28,433.2358674464,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,26,556.8101870027,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,12,1268.2431905096,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,14,1451.3910927748,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,11,1511.8817958104,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,87,10.1175661183,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,85,14.9844583071,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,100,6.4988606685,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,n/a,10/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,16,1348.8372093023,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,17,1127.7564993898,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,141,0.0978157328,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,84,13.1940180058,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,83,16.5567307894,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,83,19.5702624905,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,132,0.4361329141,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,135,0.5733157631,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,122,0.8893988109,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,108,2.5512807429,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,115,2.5512807429,2011, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,52,72.309005453,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,53,85.4161250789,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,51,96.4529971087,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,78,14.1244276763,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,87,13.0828114127,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,46,98.9933998673,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,45,142.5048556757,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,48,116.761288357,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,22,492.7,2010,,"Science and Technoloty Advisory Group of Executive Yuan, R.O.C.; CEPD",10/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,26,492.7,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,,,n/a, ,n/a, +2012,TZA,Tanzania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,133,0.4014163217,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,137,0.4976363787,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,135,0.753404336,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,124,0.8676222898,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,117,1.5068443333,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,126,1.4582128474,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,83,13.2328479836,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,81,17.7219233319,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,76,23.49029353,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,56,44.9862121729,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,55,70.3557417855,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,55,80.4063791417,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,8,1446.3381970168,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,12,1563.1631420015,,,, +2014,USA,United States,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,13,1474.0755144306,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,94,7.4217937158,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,95,8.0606598811,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,92,10.6827684475,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,101,3.1287216684,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,101,4.6789617486,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,99,6.702299621,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,135,0.2910298691,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,140,0.4032277576,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,142,0.4611693519,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,54,62.590890815,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,54,73.8730889588,2011,,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,53,83.7479599451,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,114,1.2377760908,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,116,1.5584463003,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,117,2.3445661022,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,119,1.0340888174,2010,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,120,1.3328756604,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,SECURESERVERPC,3.04 Secure Internet servers/million pop.,112,2.9873982071,2012, ,World Bank; World Development Indicators database; http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",130,0.628867799,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",142,0.56715,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",67,11.7897719983,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",65,19.0375367681,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",76,17.358,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",55,17.9378528325,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",49,27.6085719311,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",53,32.445,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",41,27.4943277552,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",52,25.7117974566,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",67,21.983,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",86,7.7522303961,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",58,22.1958908935,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",47,40.373,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",32,41.36144911,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",32,50.3960900859,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",33,69.066,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",16,73.744147154,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",19,81.9194002403,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",17,108.08,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",75,9.6915086328,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",64,19.10225238,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",45,40.591,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",142,0.0908885227,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",125,1.8910660003,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",123,3.4619,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",11,112.0232082215,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",12,131.1371644574,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",11,180.39,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",115,2.2454742355,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",117,3.4066226062,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",126,3.2487,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",104,3.4741198198,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",124,2.1825596199,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",139,1.812,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",110,2.7900929395,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",132,1.5283036047,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",128,3.0316,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",21,64.1915645567,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",23,70.5722090828,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",25,85.424,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",62,14.4090298508,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",73,14.7185525736,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",74,18.108,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",60,15.6499526604,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",69,17.7672216791,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",65,23.945,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",54,18.3369403623,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",102,4.2709612201,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",108,4.7432085382,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",113,5.1762,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",65,12.6189748409,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",47,28.0242593312,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",41,44.837,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",49,20.6380748654,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",38,38.1770266357,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",34,67.41,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",42,25.0676827434,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",59,21.994914072,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",48,39.925,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",124,3.286,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",90,6.4359843776,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",90,8.4416882645,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",104,6.509,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",25,54.0393711421,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",24,70.1504905468,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",18,100.5,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",5,155.5122208173,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",5,167.6359100673,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",6,312.01,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",52,19.1399747124,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",61,20.4142957451,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",46,40.46,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",114,2.3886317589,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",120,2.6922724934,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",125,3.2614,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",85,7.7944935021,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",67,18.0438781466,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",78,16.95,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",133,0.4107375678,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",140,0.3215119128,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",146,0.26038,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",72,10.2451724618,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",72,16.7956862332,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",68,20.37,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",108,3.0578018638,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",104,5.8057073224,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",106,6.3165,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",64,12.6863153343,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",40,36.2159889231,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",59,29.89,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",26,51.6360298602,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",31,53.5685908336,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",32,69.698,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",19,69.2450605903,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",16,91.0643307324,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",19,100.06,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",15,74.0872217571,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",22,74.78566762,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",30,74.793,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",8,142.1583624864,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",8,159.5107931582,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",12,174.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",73,10.1929796161,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",80,11.7648895893,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",84,14.874,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",83,8.1199478699,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",88,8.9334865833,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",99,7.6792,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",82,8.2538099648,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",48,27.7416744698,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",55,31.804,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",89,6.5907005525,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",114,3.8286154254,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",117,4.242,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",24,56.0710819481,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",27,64.0692732369,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",27,81.365,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",43,23.1438450142,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",54,24.3780951679,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",62,26.478,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",99,5.3574738889,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",95,6.9736736588,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",115,4.7788,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",13,107.2672714079,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",14,118.4447838561,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",14,159.29,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",18,69.5925647248,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",20,78.5897066078,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",26,83.918,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",100,6.3141106278,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",108,5.5092,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",10,132.7511638508,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",6,166.0730583182,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",9,188.92,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",45,21.3537666946,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",50,26.695025008,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",40,52.946,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",122,1.4505762424,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",143,0.2248290381,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",147,0.23044,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",128,1.7308393674,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",134,2.0511,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",127,1.0628112119,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",130,1.6056541866,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",133,2.1167,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",35,30.9978113938,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",51,26.0075161423,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",35,64.208,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",103,3.9713071864,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",96,6.9338130929,2004,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",102,6.6301,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",91,6.3831652669,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",109,4.5467171049,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",98,8.3819,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",1,776.6248635113,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",1,1046.3287461125,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",2,1426.6,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",94,5.9319150573,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",107,4.8661988623,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",118,4.1726,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",31,42.9202540896,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",62,19.9478750699,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",60,28.743,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",139,0.1075995437,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",142,0.2265883078,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",148,0.22864,2004, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",74,9.9749473955,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",79,12.2448803832,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",83,15.314,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",109,2.9477131157,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",94,7.1963541518,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",77,17.063,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",96,5.8249631546,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",99,6.3190779013,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",111,5.2772,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",22,64.0568794342,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",25,69.0305587781,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",20,97.097,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",106,3.1196147975,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",116,3.539663955,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",121,3.7314,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",2,290.9947482846,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",3,287.1394864952,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",5,318.96,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",84,8.0238069562,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",39,37.7819301798,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",39,56.17,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",23,61.5314654934,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",28,60.8202423068,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",28,76.346,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",48,20.9668639514,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",46,29.538995683,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",69,20.193,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",92,6.3798668144,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",97,6.3370524832,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",112,5.2194,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",59,15.8333274436,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",56,23.111478672,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",52,32.827,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",79,8.5922742925,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",60,21.9387326611,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",54,32.028,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",116,1.9260435335,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",110,4.5437520215,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",66,23.715,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",137,0.2812030918,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",129,1.7264463392,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",120,3.8749,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",40,28.0674946679,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",74,13.5299483479,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",89,13.619,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",66,11.8783793932,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",70,17.1701503479,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",63,25.815,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",76,9.5529232858,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",102,5.9511289199,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",109,5.4442,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",96,9.397,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",117,1.9075886678,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",123,2.2574478396,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",71,18.445,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",136,0.613610065,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",135,2.0064,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",81,10.9915353448,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",88,14.044,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",105,3.3157639391,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",105,5.2236291387,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",107,5.9948,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",135,0.3102148693,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",119,2.8159750873,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",105,6.3298,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",30,45.4256352556,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",29,57.5710231848,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",29,76.193,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",14,87.5842341372,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",17,89.5639308329,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",1,4088.5,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",37,29.9772424017,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",35,44.7793445852,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",38,59.027,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",100,4.790436945,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",93,7.5580753304,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",85,14.871,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",20,65.7731776981,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",15,91.1177410473,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",23,94.175,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",98,5.5120917388,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",137,0.5531034021,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",143,0.49332,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",87,7.3164306003,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",89,8.7153069078,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",81,15.67,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",58,16.8313615865,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",68,17.9452311903,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",58,30.836,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",118,1.8675380874,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",106,4.8928194749,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",110,5.2924,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",51,19.2069913448,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",33,47.8496639344,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",3,625.75,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",95,9.425,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",46,21.317104723,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",18,84.6169540743,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",37,60.621,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",28,48.3477733237,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",30,53.5763901041,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",22,94.295,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",124,1.3122890015,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",133,1.2439534097,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",140,1.6365,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",111,2.6976721691,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",113,3.8903352151,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",127,3.0419,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",77,9.2105692398,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",76,12.7142142124,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",80,16.125,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",140,0.1020035632,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",115,3.7877044718,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",129,2.8034,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",69,11.44481569,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",82,10.6512216506,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",79,16.424,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",101,4.4133366722,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",121,2.3486763936,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",122,3.5636,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",138,0.1110131466,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",139,0.3680416009,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",145,0.30627,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",78,8.6383192733,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",75,12.8574976185,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",64,24.725,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",6,154.3330423521,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",7,162.5322730144,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",13,172.86,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",12,109.641011226,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",9,151.2571740366,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",10,187.81,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",120,1.6836593032,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",131,1.5307674304,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",141,1.6323,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",50,19.3074000896,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",55,23.7061840378,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",56,31.062,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",93,6.1080173626,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",98,6.3310610131,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",97,8.9479,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",112,2.5948737928,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",91,8.1724601526,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",100,7.2825,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",47,21.2778616354,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",36,44.1210418419,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",57,30.838,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",80,8.4867073601,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",87,9.3188540167,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",91,13.094,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",71,10.7226189508,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",77,12.3604501992,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",86,14.269,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",34,37.7294983009,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",37,40.2441077002,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",31,70.62,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",9,135.4294613098,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",10,135.4294613098,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",15,136.87,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",7,146.6486039288,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",11,135.3321064669,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",8,195.54,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",81,8.3020311548,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",86,9.481970913,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",92,11.585,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",57,17.072481403,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",57,22.3328478185,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",50,33.212,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",27,51.4015492577,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",13,126.1081475418,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",16,114.92,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",36,30.7756324219,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",45,31.7112206125,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",51,32.838,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",125,1.1896136663,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",111,4.4138006662,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",103,6.585,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",39,28.2523586793,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",43,33.031124026,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",49,36.396,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",113,2.4127920443,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",118,2.9091595246,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",114,5.1216,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",4,172.1513652273,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",2,343.7283088698,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",4,387.64,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",137,1.9943,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",121,1.5233284236,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",101,6.0423634165,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",101,6.85,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",29,47.0108908214,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",21,76.761158995,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",24,89.563,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",107,3.0983661115,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",83,10.0345850829,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",136,2.0015,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",68,11.5260092553,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",78,12.2760055914,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",93,11.477,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",17,70.384071803,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",26,68.249665795,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",21,94.652,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",3,236.9185903775,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",4,244.4395880636,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",7,279.29,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",131,0.5782067088,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",122,2.346861242,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",138,1.8177,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",103,5.8665954173,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",82,15.606,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",123,1.3573979141,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",141,0.1005959598,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",141,0.2283267416,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",144,0.48965,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",70,10.828506585,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",53,24.6335593638,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",61,26.649,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",132,0.52591559,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",138,0.52591559,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",61,15.2142962565,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",71,17.1409212918,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",75,17.467,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",56,17.8417033755,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",63,19.7528153144,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",72,18.442,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",63,13.274621783,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",70,18.745,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",53,19.0873476571,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",42,33.9381601041,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",44,40.629,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",38,29.7182799744,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",41,34.5876393315,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",42,44.346,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",129,0.7012621498,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",135,0.9015151787,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",119,3.9737,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",128,0.8635534404,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",112,4.2056524787,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",116,4.6695,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",95,5.8674691135,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",85,9.8349784056,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",87,14.143,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",44,22.9882064365,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",44,32.0780674228,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",43,40.635,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",33,39.1842498316,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",34,47.1741194561,,,, +2014,USA,United States,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",36,61.938,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",88,6.7717153243,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",92,8.1084384994,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",94,10.914,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",97,5.5518080806,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",84,9.9979919309,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",90,13.359,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",126,1.0772649867,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",134,1.0821274943,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",130,2.7875,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",119,1.7141458329,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",66,18.8739866748,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",73,18.111,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",134,0.3820127027,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",126,1.8888498223,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",131,2.7209,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",136,0.3001970212,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",127,1.7478699181,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,INTERNETBANDWIDTHPERUSER,"3.03 Int’l Internet bandwidth, kb/s per user",132,2.6433,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",129,40,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",139,40,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",69,98.2,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",90,94.1,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",96,94.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",109,94.1,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",66,98.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",72,98.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",43,99.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",47,99.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",111,83,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",113,83,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",122,83,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",125,61.1,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",131,61.1,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",137,61.1,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",22,99.99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",24,99.99,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",42,99.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",41,99.7,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",43,99.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",128,45.9,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",133,45.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,95,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",35,99.89,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",24,99.99,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",87,96,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,96,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",46,99.46,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CHN,China,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",48,99.46,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CHN,China,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",54,99.46,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",93,92.2,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",98,92.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",108,94.5,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",126,58,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",132,58,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",138,58,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",111,83,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",113,83,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",119,72,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",87,96,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,96,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",121,69.5,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",126,69.5,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",134,69.5,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",24,99.98,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",27,99.98,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",32,99.98,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",37,99.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",45,99.6,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",43,99.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",88,97,2008,Reiterated from the GITR 2013 ,"International Telecommunication Union, ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2012 (December edition)",22/01/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",115,81.16,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",117,81.16,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",107,94.59,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",114,81.5,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",116,81.5,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",124,81.5,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",92,93.3,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",95,94.63,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",96,96.04,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",42,99.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",41,99.7,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",43,99.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",37,99.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",38,99.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",43,99.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",22,99.99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",24,99.99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",136,10,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",137,10,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",130,73,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",45,99.5,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",47,99.5,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",53,99.5,2008, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,FRA,France,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,FRA,France,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",119,79,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",128,79,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",37,99.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",41,99.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99.6,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",50,99.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",57,99.1,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",117,77,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",111,84.9,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",118,87,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",118,80,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",127,80,2008, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",106,85,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",108,85,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",119,85,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",118,76,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",120,76,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",88,97,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",104,89.93,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",104,89.93,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",116,89.93,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",111,83,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IND,India,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",113,83,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IND,India,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",122,83,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",89,95.8,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,96,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",90,95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,95,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",90,95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,95,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",105,89,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",105,89.1,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",117,89.08,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",79,96,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",87,97.5,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",131,72,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",56,99.11,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",138,0.77,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",144,16.35,2003, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",74,98,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,98,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",70,98,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",74,98,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,98,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",127,55,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",121,75,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",125,81,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,98,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",67,98.8,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",73,98.8,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",79,98.8,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",68,98.4,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",72,97.98,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",79,97.98,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",85,97.98,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",134,23,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",135,23,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",142,23,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",135,20,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",136,20,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",143,20,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",145,2.25,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",106,85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",106,87.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",113,91.3,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",132,32.23,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",124,62,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",129,62,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",136,62,2008, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",106,85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",108,85,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",119,85,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",86,96.2,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",93,96.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",95,96.07,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",70,98,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",74,98,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",76,97,2001,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",88,97,2001, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",131,35.13,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",134,35.13,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",141,35.13,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",76,97,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,97,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",88,97,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",73,97.6,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",74,98,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",86,97.6,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",94,92,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",99,92,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",111,92,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",96,90.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",99,92,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,96,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",75,97.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",92,96.97,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",46,99.54,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",52,99.54,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",123,68.4,2009,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",128,68.4,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",135,68.4,2009, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",91,94,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,94,2009,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",110,94,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",90,95,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,95,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",79,96,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",80,97.32,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",80,98.42,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",47,99.1,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99.33,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",55,99.42,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,90,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",114,91.1,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",37,99.87,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",124,70,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",132,70,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,95,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",90,95,2008,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,95,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",78,96.95,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",107,87.38,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99.7,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",36,99.85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",42,99.7,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",41,99.7,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99.7,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",49,99,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",51,99,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",95,91,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",94,94.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",93,96.8,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,n/a,,n/a,11/12/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",74,98,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",81,98,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",74,97.5,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",133,24,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",121,75,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",140,36.1,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",130,37.77,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2011, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",137,0,2001,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2001, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",122,69,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",127,69,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",111,92,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",,,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",58,99,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2007,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",106,85,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",108,85,2011,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,95,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2008,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2006,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",25,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",28,99.9,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",1,100,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",37,99.8,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,USA,United States,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",38,99.8,,,, +2014,USA,United States,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",33,99.9,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",101,90,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",115,90,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",120,70,2006,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",124,70,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",132,70,2006, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",110,84,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",112,84,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",121,84,2010, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",41,99.79,2007,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",40,99.79,2010,,International Telecommunication Union;World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database (December 2012 edition);www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,15/12/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",48,99.79,2007, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",97,90,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",129,62,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",129,78,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",116,80,2010,,International Telecommunication Union; The World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (december edition),11/12/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",123,72.4,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,MOBILENETWORKCOVERAGE,"3.02 Mobile network coverage, % pop.",125,81,2012, ,International Telecommunication Union; ITU World Telecommunication/ICT indicators database 2013 (December edition); http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/wtid.aspx,06/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",121,221.2555696419,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",120,280.0229330408,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",91,1193.5008425544,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",87,1648.4361468251,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",93,1318.6919108921,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",7,13898.0569626994,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",9,13053.093359601,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",10,11107.6676374125,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",62,3057.4379030948,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",64,3041.8244306954,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",65,3180.9235041852,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",83,1874.5816535876,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",85,1838.2621081051,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",74,2507.6582594497,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",11,11240.6003022514,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",10,11488.6680598032,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",9,11120.8097480118,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",25,7830.9231736279,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",25,7987.8223136245,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",26,7618.2465447933,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",68,2669.5066863455,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",79,2108.9177973595,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",81,2212.3425910724,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",138,26.1853101669,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",142,15.5430528489,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",147,14.2270026943,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",20,8412.1115796753,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",17,8726.6773344004,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",31,6935.1024222689,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",139,16.2757689702,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",143,14.7644014238,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",146,15.7467513378,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",136,41.5653209592,2009,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",138,41.5653209592,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",142,44.0146705852,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",120,240.2901326177,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",119,257.5118184098,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",118,288.2395609684,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",38,5873.0218531107,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",38,5587.642454692,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",32,6807.3989076155,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",10,11339.2863081895,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",11,10307.9914293874,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",12,10694.9141529312,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",59,3513.6257989849,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",53,4158.2585371434,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",57,3979.869362351,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",101,720.1649528634,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2011, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",106,648.7520983076,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",109,626.0845080049,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",106,699.5049128549,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",72,2419.1352681379,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",73,2413.8482946738,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",73,2700.1682696192,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",55,3714.4536703652,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",56,3793.9348262729,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",60,3698.3409178448,2010, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",16,8897.9581226686,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",16,9218.1187585654,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",16,9163.3211319715,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",15,9688.5636342475,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",116,322.7915380531,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",121,224.0640782892,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",124,187.2450862007,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",4,18485.8416731382,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",4,17522.7928375578,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",3,18510.4332390275,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",17,8766.3233572722,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",20,8504.3060108843,2011,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",21,8501.1514099019,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",57,3554.7420088115,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",60,3649.3010740876,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",58,3915.5870769652,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",70,2602.5549199234,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CHN,China,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",69,2776.0128588382,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CHN,China,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",61,3508.3779098748,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",117,305.4720525462,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",116,304.5990739237,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",117,314.5443253759,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",118,295.9147978616,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",117,299.3998235622,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",119,283.4147717518,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",90,1244.8178325176,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",90,1254.3248085537,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",94,1313.1602866956,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",112,526.2931114079,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",111,563.4421637806,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",111,570.2944531144,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",79,2095.2543539275,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",82,2023.6168502589,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",83,2075.4884247142,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",47,4714.944554369,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",50,4793.3328014541,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",51,4414.6373575588,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",26,7825.8691432302,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",23,8110.6166357662,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",23,8260.2538704931,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",29,7168.7444136677,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",27,7509.0737693381,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",28,7460.5715124193,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",31,6553.6336213278,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",30,6952.0915308247,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",40,5438.3542874151,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",86,1594.8352748509,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",89,1529.266748135,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",95,1278.6277107154,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",92,1168.698944941,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",92,1223.7137171987,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",90,1356.4613919851,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",89,1323.8489151823,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",93,1208.072100918,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",91,1329.2247568472,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",85,1673.0654013063,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",86,1743.6856594888,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",84,1972.3030142432,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",32,6387.0300684868,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",33,6409.6543569703,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",34,6350.4099629146,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",24,7883.6489351002,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",14,9673.4646061182,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",18,8933.8776582878,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",135,47.5414757209,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",137,50.5741315583,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",141,57.7337863454,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",9,13398.1809760695,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",7,14982.0485397938,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",8,12997.449528498,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",19,8600.0316759914,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,FRA,France,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",18,8722.7358703541,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,FRA,France,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",22,8449.8322282269,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",94,1127.569688003,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",97,1109.763028894,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",35,5970.4327404413,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",36,6075.6529475761,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",37,5697.1863805014,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",81,1921.020806014,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",84,1940.2375986216,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",79,2273.7208368649,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",115,359.3078044114,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",115,376.0010429643,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",115,451.2361574244,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",130,97.8361612082,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",135,90.1517645957,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",126,134.4655331222,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",123,142.709845909,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",127,147.3900899817,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",44,4848.4116498902,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",41,5369.975435482,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",47,5103.204589081,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",108,636.7028012732,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",107,644.1672260969,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",113,553.9017982293,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",94,1091.0377898235,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",95,1084.9746285921,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",98,1046.0210868633,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",41,5485.4145780299,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",40,5530.2197409941,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",39,5519.2601391481,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",98,895.1432215461,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",99,883.096375627,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",100,916.3306294765,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",66,2764.8098729242,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",66,2865.6581621133,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",75,2500.1168060552,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",134,49.916128579,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",135,73.0922936696,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",139,71.5648094104,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",56,3589.9933284991,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",59,3737.4914037698,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",62,3460.262244997,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",109,636.0343307784,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",106,654.8462847645,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",104,748.0835680518,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",102,697.0789475224,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,IND,India,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",102,744.6873467531,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IND,India,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",101,861.748806133,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",34,6188.5493818137,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",35,6315.5457455777,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",36,5993.7264617009,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",64,2967.6733169233,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",68,2778.1641143568,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",66,3178.0878002357,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",1,53352.474940024,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",1,53637.7385305668,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",1,54817.1564049141,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",23,7955.0793223773,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",28,7507.7391258723,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",25,7677.6388168793,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",46,4742.0976408867,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",48,4877.6866572531,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",48,4832.1695772634,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",65,2860.3652121361,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",81,2052.6042439531,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",85,1899.5012008129,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",74,2365.8939242449,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",74,2412.8486897718,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",77,2369.6812813461,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",21,8215.7802615145,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",21,8405.7994644021,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",24,8041.5806372408,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",43,5130.8993829264,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",47,4890.8001941904,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",44,5229.0412590958,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",123,183.4591942285,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",122,174.2174052792,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",125,186.756932438,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",76,2282.2372496783,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",80,2061.9322720265,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",72,2748.7034417728,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",129,105.6961316518,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",133,86.279036276,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",138,72.0943412994,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",14,9239.7362909619,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",13,9674.9645820684,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",13,10567.3146148308,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",3,20306.8572578895,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",3,20109.6933589189,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",4,18387.9758249179,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",122,242.818900723,2010, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",71,2550.0880147543,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",62,3281.1610225424,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",59,3733.9229121176,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",132,87.3321690782,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",136,87.6632892313,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",49,4858.3135587442,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",49,4524.4872676498,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",113,451.406209468,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",113,483.3251833741,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",112,558.052613925,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",131,92.1099534937,2010,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",131,93.0578387038,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",134,100.5089269516,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",52,3966.308698824,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",51,4384.8459150233,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",89,1401.2401272139,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",33,6293.7442352558,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",34,6377.3170293893,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",45,5159.5567523018,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",75,2322.1225097944,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",72,2469.8048725538,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",69,2960.862585658,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",105,664.8478281004,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",104,676.5077293403,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",103,775.8093220889,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",95,997.50788089,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",96,1009.6468956303,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",87,1624.9152929355,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",133,56.7882935486,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",136,67.0835786853,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",140,65.8674907096,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",77,2256.2295703167,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",76,2366.653048917,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",76,2449.4843198092,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",60,3074.7508920724,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",61,3319.7699887542,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",63,3268.231704129,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",137,33.8866071138,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",139,34.8763596163,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",143,38.3500736321,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",39,5585.2695762249,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",42,5234.4133085019,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",41,5265.482053202,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",128,139.9597556964,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",50,4227.6913785294,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",54,4157.4468422597,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",53,4279.4258866597,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",87,1553.9045553959,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",88,1541.4917583664,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",86,1725.7223398805,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",103,677.341500656,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",103,742.0837149,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",107,684.6649334026,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",124,165.9963086305,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",124,140.3350870285,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",129,134.8093343803,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",84,1870.9365353714,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",77,2265.8254851643,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",80,2265.8254851643,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",127,119.6705803088,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",126,120.2025440564,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",131,119.121645295,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",58,3541.2686957258,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",58,3759.6878215074,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",50,4523.4585608218,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",97,952.9990156434,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",101,776.9578043226,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",110,644.8360357825,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",125,140.1114905161,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",125,128.0163558517,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",126,164.6477763887,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",110,596.3896864509,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",110,604.704188798,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",109,647.7401236142,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",30,6777.5338861597,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",31,6905.2831368308,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",35,6092.1873327328,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",2,27298.9129917613,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",2,25372.797311327,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",2,29244.2380942798,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",128,106.6930221034,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",129,105.9704153296,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",130,121.9603491144,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",12,10035.5616999659,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",12,10261.4588580063,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",14,9984.4352710293,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",36,5961.7825506084,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",32,6571.5609918511,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",30,7231.6146594754,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",111,547.2095341667,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",112,559.5492782468,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",114,540.7275474449,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",82,1887.5750883535,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",83,2006.7009426324,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",82,2100.6437482521,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",93,1139.360394062,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",91,1229.0909399363,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",92,1324.4352409651,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",104,674.491324961,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",105,675.233517213,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",105,727.7590604115,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",53,3948.3934159403,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",55,4110.9706468074,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",55,4192.8003192923,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",40,5565.3380530521,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",39,5536.8261768095,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",38,5536.8261768095,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",48,4613.5115544223,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",46,4952.8331596998,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",52,4325.7608768861,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",15,8902.3829250934,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",19,8666.0258484377,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",20,8766.9480611651,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",5,15483.5752045041,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",6,15519.1783522608,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",6,16081.4107683178,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",63,3008.6786455518,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",70,2688.0783091526,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",70,2899.2044454686,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",28,7253.4822171356,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",29,6976.5696568248,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",29,7365.7036933408,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",140,15.993455478,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",140,23.2948883625,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",144,22.8117353748,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",27,7803.8299072342,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",24,8097.3236517967,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",17,9007.9767368948,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",122,203.6968647905,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",120,236.0644146936,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",123,226.0940261592,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",18,8741.6411998116,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",22,8380.9848424092,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",19,8873.7774176746,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",141,20.90849866,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",145,21.2721376477,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",96,972.3265424916,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",98,939.5458720935,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",99,927.8733143635,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",54,3736.5770584553,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",43,5111.3217436274,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",42,5238.3710958299,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",61,3067.568039824,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",63,3083.5165553869,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",67,3081.6670607663,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",45,4765.0683202836,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",44,5033.2415670506,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",43,5231.7196175346,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",22,8125.6701609179,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",26,7931.3359527049,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",27,7544.1463992941,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",6,14341.8990861455,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",5,16291.6343840976,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",5,17383.2781123796,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",114,408.5734354245,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",114,431.237296468,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",116,383.4101005557,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,n/a,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",67,2806.4789571353,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",71,2806.4789571353,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",80,2082.9928153174,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",141,9.3863557305,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",144,8.6860406823,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",148,8.3543474485,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",78,2159.5335863304,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",78,2159.7638708236,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",78,2342.9647641147,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",73,2413.0916386009,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",75,2377.4248568931,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,28/11/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,0,0,0, +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2008,,n/a,10/11/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",127,112.0012246148,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",133,112.0012246148,2011, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",37,5929.19822094,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",37,5788.1586322136,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",33,6651.5038084679,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",88,1494.1460332331,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",,,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",88,1511.1769004478,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",67,2701.0470642488,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",65,2903.1099693378,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",64,3236.5715599124,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",13,9909.2672713208,2009,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",15,9221.5442263012,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",11,10859.0293043952,2011,0,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",130,104.4297050982,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",128,106.3303356358,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",132,114.3791381944,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",132,69.4333827536,2008,,US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); The World Factbook,10/11/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",134,75.5377803367,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",137,74.396774521,2009, ,Central Intelligence Agency;The World Factbook;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/,18/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",51,4184.5916852962,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",57,3767.0264671587,2009,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",54,4265.2293676336,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",69,2620.7670308763,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",71,2647.8816647723,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",68,3057.2019508873,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",8,13524.2037039563,2009,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,USA,United States,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",8,14019.9526756272,,,, +2014,USA,United States,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",7,13639.7021299207,2012, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",49,4251.877885705,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",52,4349.1755918828,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",56,4137.5055613229,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",99,849.8821992465,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",97,967.0560883464,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",96,1129.0869763206,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",119,289.3055716072,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",118,289.091998213,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",121,266.3038594836,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",42,5180.9063308462,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",45,5004.3440662691,2010,Population figures for corresponding year sourced from World Bank Development Indicators Online Database,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database;http://data.worldbank.org/,28/11/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",46,5131.3034357984,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",100,783.223254493,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",100,810.1387751689,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",102,840.1181886541,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",107,641.687540251,2008,,The World Bank; World Development Indicators Online,10/11/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",108,631.5540365907,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ELECTPRODPC,"3.01 Electricity production, kWh/capita",108,668.1020317937,2011, ,World Bank;World Bank Development Indicators Online Database (October 2013); http://data.worldbank.org/,18/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),137,1.9777935535,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),146,1.5527600612,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),75,3.7378166415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),79,3.5998908668,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),90,3.4870449351,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),25,5.6450005306,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),30,5.4596516026,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),30,5.6177242657,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),58,4.3694459531,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),70,3.9891121755,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),78,3.8581432124,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),85,3.5217654628,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),72,3.8774662517,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),53,4.5795110143,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),7,6.5975239106,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),6,6.8059782629,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),8,6.7896031008,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),12,6.198200039,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),9,6.5951487411,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),10,6.5291850583,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),72,3.781872846,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),75,3.8234088404,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),55,4.5539212233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),131,2.2845572215,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),128,2.1997191644,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),133,2.1160470899,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),21,5.8003909536,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),18,6.2047188483,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),22,6.0397847532,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),116,2.7995927876,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),113,2.7889405495,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),122,2.6929188507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),127,2.445079243,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),136,1.789431829,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),147,1.4104116572,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),114,2.8732637323,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),109,2.8448202116,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),112,2.8830890944,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),39,4.8552249252,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),37,5.0326605581,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),34,5.2580562349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),31,5.20433323,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),39,4.9668331112,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),39,5.0466382685,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),62,4.2637299389,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),64,4.1315750236,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),63,4.3761156253,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),78,3.664563163,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),129,2.396680603,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),138,1.7365954008,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),114,2.8334293497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),68,4.003011877,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),62,4.1634636451,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),56,4.5285535142,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),33,5.1255200733,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),32,5.2530623623,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),35,5.2532213739,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),48,4.6566271985,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),50,4.4716783465,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),37,5.1524028345,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),67,4.2151103525,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),93,3.2711961413,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),100,3.0593121778,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),109,3.0085824292,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),3,6.8370849406,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),5,6.8143449192,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),7,6.7912924037,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),8,6.4935457115,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),8,6.7069659583,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),9,6.6948625534,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),50,4.5916844624,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),61,4.1754330622,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),44,4.8621957885,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),87,3.4904244304,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),83,3.4604225132,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),86,3.533614963,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),106,3.0816025364,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),99,3.0653434612,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),105,3.1094245054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),132,2.2107031787,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),137,1.7507443877,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),143,1.5751388972,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),88,3.4673737053,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),96,3.1801346919,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),80,3.7426289829,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),117,2.7824273588,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),103,3.0366124585,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),107,3.0602401283,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),77,3.6759282815,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),76,3.7691357741,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),92,3.433659793,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),23,5.7104327274,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),21,6.0760613886,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),28,5.7974758818,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),26,5.485187716,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),23,5.8533904627,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),23,6.0372519997,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),14,6.0851902566,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),10,6.5010366884,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),11,6.4809041054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),15,6.0696598038,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),14,6.399401528,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),20,6.1530690231,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),84,3.5367499111,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),98,3.0847545591,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),87,3.517903675,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),105,3.0824659612,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),119,2.6172241863,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),127,2.4299297855,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),90,3.3703453726,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),78,3.7077234239,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),75,3.9356438128,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),89,3.4333451979,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),93,3.1935400499,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),99,3.3011670057,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),32,5.1673863462,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),31,5.4334040772,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),32,5.4762293456,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),24,5.6877828177,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),26,5.7913468826,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),25,5.9383787219,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),140,1.8550136075,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),141,1.6157074976,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),135,1.9484026975,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),5,6.8213115776,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),2,6.8686913713,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),1,6.8831099737,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),30,5.4164508739,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),28,5.7621028662,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),27,5.7982561144,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),125,2.3180957858,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),132,2.2807720993,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),11,6.2138840357,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),13,6.421046706,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),15,6.3567488295,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),60,4.3420855104,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),68,4.0319210245,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),59,4.4973810223,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),124,2.6249025514,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),121,2.5146959639,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),124,2.5011995667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),132,2.0956720999,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),134,2.0075134046,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),115,2.8208031378,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),117,2.6809557791,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),123,2.6005640122,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),42,4.7808290205,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),46,4.6239200345,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),40,5.0359053783,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),110,3.0327245508,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),116,2.693961668,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),100,3.2891949206,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),92,3.3454919834,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),94,3.1854847727,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),98,3.3175573306,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),28,5.4760251923,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),27,5.7839416033,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),26,5.8827190009,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),96,3.2151324925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),107,2.8774579251,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),115,2.8330850069,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),45,4.7246891755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),57,4.2846058196,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),54,4.5651407848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),142,1.4951868415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),144,1.5255028465,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),142,1.6274199396,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),61,4.3169057394,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),58,4.2500320096,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),64,4.3544254161,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),103,3.109240477,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),89,3.2632145453,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),85,3.5756456847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),100,3.1564509252,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),111,2.7973389458,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),119,2.7152091871,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),17,6.0178028773,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),16,6.2405148635,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),19,6.1716626686,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),99,3.1590170479,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),97,3.1336950985,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),103,3.1421746303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),2,6.8945737778,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),1,6.8737234583,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),2,6.8803051009,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),38,4.8602397505,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),29,5.7302096565,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),29,5.7137294803,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),43,4.7788512686,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),40,4.9423682847,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),42,4.9147366733,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),54,4.4646634825,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),65,4.1009302715,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),79,3.8079080925,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),79,3.6617393635,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),81,3.552660074,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),88,3.5080530705,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),22,5.7202553935,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),24,5.8419175681,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),21,6.0936335744,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),71,3.879434979,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),63,4.1405016009,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),58,4.5041190416,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),112,2.9019664072,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),110,2.8398758576,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),94,3.3858149032,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),98,3.2087180982,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),90,3.2570927478,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),96,3.3508301358,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),66,4.0694497487,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),87,3.3143598503,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),97,3.3465855834,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),18,5.9763720674,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),20,6.1330104618,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),13,6.4163781154,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),37,4.9296006814,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),45,4.6403131973,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),52,4.6505259571,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),125,2.4590603366,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),95,3.2191958662,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),88,3.2699346182,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),77,3.8623548971,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),142,1.5731869996,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),145,1.5664262338,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),80,3.5596843407,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),84,3.5795041579,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),102,3.1158651181,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),101,3.0530383731,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),104,3.1184568802,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),133,2.1286307216,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),130,2.1590861402,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),131,2.3665848205,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),35,4.9960377094,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),33,5.2328052395,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),45,4.8542221655,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),13,6.173741851,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),12,6.4336228315,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),17,6.2890642555,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),47,4.678752886,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),41,4.8258216503,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),41,5.033788243,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),94,3.2474771998,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),95,3.1802792543,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),93,3.4177290396,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),63,4.2574494185,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),55,4.3078376298,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),60,4.4391366865,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),134,2.1122290335,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),143,1.5604817777,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),144,1.5665571495,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),81,3.6167487627,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),82,3.5318369433,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),81,3.7214161769,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),59,4.35867003,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),69,3.9939088701,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),61,4.4346440817,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),139,1.8595054509,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),139,1.6543879762,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),140,1.6888232067,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),16,6.0518425247,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),15,6.2630679526,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),18,6.2840895438,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),136,1.8777461115,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),46,4.6822100689,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),42,4.788133661,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),46,4.8114418267,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),64,4.2152090476,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),60,4.1778124489,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),69,4.1861923281,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),136,2.0474213406,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),135,1.8146673495,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),137,1.8597668575,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),128,2.4223035634,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),134,1.9516937855,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),139,1.7182580018,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),73,3.7778214908,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),77,3.7330894938,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),76,3.882537626,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),123,2.6755912212,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),120,2.5815525731,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),126,2.4327687696,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),65,4.1188571645,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),73,3.8490719493,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),71,4.1150898694,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),97,3.2097052311,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),102,3.0413230501,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),106,3.098209697,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),119,2.7470820953,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),115,2.6973561001,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),117,2.8100452384,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),91,3.3694138786,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),91,3.254976978,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),82,3.6643568306,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),10,6.2558223104,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),11,6.4790257177,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),14,6.4153324079,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),4,6.8349466047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),3,6.8377779848,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),6,6.7968194306,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),135,2.051965435,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),140,1.6191331117,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),141,1.6508141208,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),9,6.3960714559,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),17,6.2158568461,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),12,6.4201933892,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),69,3.9864091532,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),66,4.0465793696,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),70,4.137615304,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),108,3.0457913663,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),104,3.0047531692,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),110,2.9722008365,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),55,4.4286530067,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),51,4.4218528542,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),65,4.27575222,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),86,3.5157371181,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),86,3.3149548356,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),95,3.3651676713,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),80,3.6603634195,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),84,3.4201576287,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),89,3.5052420687,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),41,4.7834781954,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),38,4.9983425299,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),38,5.0711310122,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),53,4.5535683108,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),52,4.4218014012,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),66,4.2386069201,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),34,5.0158415166,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),34,5.2307361951,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),36,5.1764779353,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),67,4.0088932782,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),67,4.0445613857,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),72,4.0998413369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),27,5.4830371415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),35,5.2153852383,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),31,5.5952577909,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),51,4.5567052356,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),47,4.6213636701,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),51,4.6914478713,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),40,4.838241706,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),43,4.7192790177,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),47,4.8085733942,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),113,2.8947888592,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),105,2.9776480482,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),108,3.0475843502,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),36,4.9893523452,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),36,5.0659288546,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),33,5.3207993694,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),109,3.0418559047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),108,2.8564210313,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),116,2.8258504424,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),20,5.8815065917,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),19,6.2014119573,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),16,6.2952611952,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),131,2.1127185544,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),138,1.8495035366,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),104,3.105035177,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),92,3.197802386,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),102,3.1498414264,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),56,4.4024679035,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),54,4.389223783,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),49,4.771300112,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),130,2.3685639268,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),118,2.6622400974,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),101,3.2547476975,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),57,4.3753736355,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),56,4.2903829871,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),62,4.3999530644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),29,5.4339886646,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),25,5.8161487882,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),24,5.9456965626,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),1,6.9035569197,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),4,6.8260529361,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),3,6.8496675472,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),122,2.6792411327,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),112,2.7970022914,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),118,2.7878255776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),44,4.6741385178,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),43,4.9072051226,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),111,2.9752372069,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),141,1.766722187,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),127,2.2188811399,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),148,1.3858167938,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),107,3.0585209307,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),71,3.9495464999,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),73,4.0706707153,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),138,1.9382429865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),126,2.2978470832,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),76,3.7257759158,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),122,2.4753667502,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),111,2.9651023004,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),44,4.7276389549,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),53,4.410571395,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),57,4.5171194063,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),70,3.908957755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),83,3.5889900923,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),52,4.5542264635,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),48,4.5574325772,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),48,4.7810690044,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),19,5.9214468016,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),22,5.9898025592,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),5,6.8060298135,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),125,2.5417414871,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),124,2.3617392138,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),120,2.7034493519,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),118,2.7770999494,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),106,2.8825722187,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),113,2.8729498821,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),74,3.7617489558,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),74,3.8478793826,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),74,4.0631486854,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),49,4.6519875678,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),49,4.5012739626,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),50,4.7628227603,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),6,6.8023715641,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),7,6.8038172118,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),4,6.8310768668,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),83,3.5418371158,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),85,3.4164480076,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),91,3.4398892379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),101,3.1163546051,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),114,2.7649384096,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),121,2.6949454109,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),121,2.6866112745,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),123,2.4277426475,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),129,2.3936593681,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),82,3.5838403415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),59,4.2079244139,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),68,4.2060174233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),120,2.7312615262,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),133,2.0222854779,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),130,2.3726358963,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),126,2.5112761009,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),129,2.1838001571,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B.03,Pillar 3. Infrastructure and digital content (1-7),128,2.4232862232,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),139,2.4911440161,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),138,2.628546724,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),65,4.782297152,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),72,4.6174501419,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),86,4.5722614017,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),36,5.2913275368,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),40,5.2325900686,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),38,5.4422666037,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),84,4.3751556255,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),97,3.9800370395,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),100,4.1343937105,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),90,4.2648435104,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),73,4.5966375072,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),51,5.1330489308,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),26,5.5345881249,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),25,5.5051280739,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),9,6.1542416416,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),10,5.9942282267,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),9,6.0131005736,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),11,6.1368170667,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),61,4.8564305285,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),51,4.9807810172,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),49,5.2116350322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),109,3.5417295946,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),138,2.4960000021,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),145,2.2820459855,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),20,5.8259006272,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),15,5.8362791005,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),25,5.6563084972,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),128,2.9856068239,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),128,2.8547381311,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),134,2.75664544,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),141,2.1353502715,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),142,2.2689241428,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),147,2.2057384014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),103,3.8657024262,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),91,4.1430140048,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),104,4.0206820025,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),73,4.6528337583,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),75,4.5271810728,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),75,4.7528977241,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),25,5.5445177361,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),35,5.2688919523,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),32,5.520535397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),50,5.0673362473,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),43,5.0775982013,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),46,5.2491945004,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),112,3.3894974723,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),122,3.1085690475,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),124,3.0082438095,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),115,3.5794977134,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),72,4.6643824632,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),74,4.5311317677,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),76,4.7073046632,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),51,5.0602553533,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),65,4.763891054,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),91,4.3961837642,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),87,4.3394277114,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),94,4.0593449385,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),78,4.6537716821,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),84,4.5762248172,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),98,3.9984308758,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),107,3.7184181136,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),118,3.3226947261,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),4,6.354320439,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),5,6.174636091,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),13,6.1009234767,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),7,6.126189689,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),8,6.0195356668,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),10,6.1515024933,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),71,4.7070921368,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),49,4.9862951787,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),60,5.0051261213,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),66,4.7810090665,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),66,4.7614398981,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),73,4.7601338981,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),121,3.1492874522,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),122,3.0668914797,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),124,3.153559555,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),131,2.9405111694,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),131,2.8037508738,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),137,2.6469015147,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),85,4.3678226316,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),80,4.4128424655,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),70,4.8548900317,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),95,4.1175056283,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),83,4.3955526457,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),102,4.0921547426,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),54,5.0533643729,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),33,5.2803325457,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),50,5.2098017295,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),15,5.9267805324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),12,5.9198394495,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),16,5.9501443386,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),45,5.1589879531,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),53,4.9737188107,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),35,5.4867425727,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),17,5.8765869756,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),14,5.8793807823,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),8,6.1574540106,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),9,6.0444862083,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),7,6.0421900531,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),14,6.0579917552,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),92,4.1757481212,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),98,3.9362045806,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),103,4.0476348884,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),88,4.333634242,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),96,3.9964152336,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),101,4.1241110775,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),91,4.2485973924,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),89,4.2634444896,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),83,4.5911575909,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),79,4.5357629306,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),82,4.4096438534,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),93,4.3520636375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),56,4.9915077553,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),61,4.849391547,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),30,5.5965420555,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),23,5.6659359764,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),24,5.5547074302,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),22,5.7340812566,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),138,2.5046846479,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),140,2.3352771958,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),135,2.7011732003,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),2,6.5007992159,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),1,6.5135860629,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),1,6.6149070713,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),28,5.5097364559,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),26,5.3978020873,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),27,5.638272046,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),114,3.3264264441,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),117,3.3413373458,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),13,5.958873203,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),10,5.9943299985,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),21,5.7354091374,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),93,4.1486399812,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),48,4.9939591207,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),40,5.3908670565,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),99,3.997338545,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),101,3.8941089864,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),109,3.8876689675,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),132,2.799191219,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),139,2.6252788957,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),126,3.0143652662,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),125,2.9969235432,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),131,2.8470352647,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),44,5.1718928158,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),47,5.0005985714,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),62,4.9721615721,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),105,3.7456498316,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),108,3.7166285391,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),107,3.9235174493,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),81,4.4367320118,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),105,3.7471709652,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),80,4.6215506057,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),16,5.8951838096,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),19,5.7041824873,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),12,6.1062249155,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),96,4.0470283709,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),102,3.8550198657,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),108,3.8941569262,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),31,5.4103772048,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),41,5.1375605652,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),41,5.3845526941,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),142,1.9661763425,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),113,3.3275439793,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),140,2.6103050481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),49,5.0826315954,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),59,4.8660028973,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),67,4.8859314982,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),74,4.6275423951,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),71,4.6561200628,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),65,4.9207736711,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),64,4.7872174898,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),68,4.701472156,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),85,4.5731813318,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),18,5.860541259,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),16,5.799167461,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),26,5.6456121915,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),104,3.7520603962,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),109,3.6864038515,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),110,3.8704725955,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),1,6.519549384,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),2,6.4336647094,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),2,6.4381399368,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),34,5.3207557939,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),22,5.5868967229,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),20,5.7558238731,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),35,5.3018214774,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),38,5.2451248781,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),33,5.4922671459,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),62,4.8217467902,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),77,4.4608546455,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),88,4.5163640238,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),47,5.098113854,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),55,4.9695777055,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),48,5.2202106879,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),27,5.5206824988,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),28,5.3568816816,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),19,5.8394247246,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),52,5.0587514806,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),50,4.9834370416,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),31,5.5701538357,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),108,3.6785772152,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),110,3.6807161856,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),99,4.1359943993,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),101,3.9276728029,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),103,3.7761351173,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),106,3.953298163,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),106,3.7427408851,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),111,3.4893546308,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),113,3.7299069527,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),24,5.6389041134,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),23,5.5594964773,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),17,5.9335412182,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),48,5.089625124,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),58,4.8689047162,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),64,4.9542524842,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),129,3.0259086712,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),89,4.3099508474,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),86,4.2945487175,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),79,4.63174118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),99,3.9257738577,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),114,3.6992691255,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),126,2.9147456277,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),122,3.2255100378,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),67,4.7783573672,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),64,4.7777969322,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),69,4.8821330703,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),127,3.0046560039,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),136,2.6791795047,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),130,2.9920799832,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),22,5.6862764179,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),20,5.6684261096,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),24,5.692639529,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),19,5.8584803323,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),18,5.7918798011,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),18,5.9146279669,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),29,5.4365133658,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),27,5.3771190663,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),29,5.6027238855,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),100,3.973080604,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),88,4.2754240027,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),95,4.3117675431,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),41,5.2161304243,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),46,5.0187067423,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),55,5.0993094615,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),135,2.7711627964,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),137,2.5736020593,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),144,2.2893225328,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),76,4.5690196637,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),76,4.466225038,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),94,4.343630362,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),78,4.5478705668,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),84,4.3639897682,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),71,4.8513942601,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),140,2.3140508959,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),141,2.320784422,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),143,2.2906159296,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),21,5.7250330127,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),21,5.6459868705,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),23,5.7272496552,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),148,2.1603077979,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),53,5.0547808322,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),62,4.820739424,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),61,4.9887665005,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),40,5.2197028211,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),42,5.1285594727,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),44,5.3066571749,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),134,2.8357916229,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),143,2.224550085,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),142,2.3058749527,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),137,2.584418036,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),133,2.7959385265,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),133,2.7763784289,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),58,4.9530748992,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),54,4.9707685679,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),47,5.2238491739,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),132,2.8627469343,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),139,2.4079060281,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),136,2.69517177,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),55,5.0346391073,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),57,4.8749524957,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),59,5.0263676198,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),113,3.3701387862,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),115,3.2676257239,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),116,3.4578869976,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),123,3.0889802796,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),123,3.0201636945,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),119,3.3102770925,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),119,3.1949155685,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),121,3.0669388221,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),121,3.2998751453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),11,5.9799754731,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),13,5.9197387733,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),15,5.96778604,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),6,6.1745290749,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),6,6.1495508744,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),4,6.2776716218,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),111,3.4698148362,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),112,3.3288799754,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),111,3.8170830752,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),12,5.9625166711,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),30,5.3284478548,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),45,5.2684784476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),70,4.7372042636,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),56,4.919866491,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),57,5.0710698263,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),97,4.0294484844,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),93,4.1118839084,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),105,3.9703115609,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),69,4.7436183638,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),60,4.860468787,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),58,5.064607014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),129,2.9612035743,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),119,3.0817987733,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),90,4.4273316233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),77,4.5685158516,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),85,4.3604923664,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),81,4.6041199577,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),38,5.2488034922,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),37,5.2594808708,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),39,5.3958180196,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),39,5.2423706668,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),69,4.6972788132,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),89,4.4575305384,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),37,5.2793782595,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),34,5.270635149,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),43,5.3491486061,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),82,4.4362658593,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),78,4.4362040036,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),82,4.6007801961,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),59,4.928849623,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),44,5.0572962734,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),36,5.4829822056,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),42,5.1930660878,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),52,4.9769299462,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),52,5.1142165532,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),32,5.4060343306,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),32,5.2889340761,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),37,5.4597052695,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),120,3.1925924339,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),116,3.245524279,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),125,3.1430572757,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),46,5.1378160635,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),39,5.2341634613,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),54,5.1055332248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),118,3.1987738355,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),120,3.0735422789,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),127,3.0821725232,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),8,6.0605281057,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),11,5.9606344785,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),6,6.1988450948,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),144,1.7390896956,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),141,2.5854936331,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),102,3.9196829909,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),90,4.1563895039,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),96,4.2436459951,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),57,4.9667852767,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),67,4.7072159214,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),53,5.106260694,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),114,3.3630684528,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),100,3.9212131113,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),92,4.3961226466,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),83,4.4308135675,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),92,4.1217691313,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),66,4.9086810522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),30,5.4338793926,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),31,5.3262612929,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),28,5.6034607694,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),3,6.4397173275,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),3,6.3822154498,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),3,6.3863450458,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),124,3.0386791818,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),130,2.8356745936,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),128,3.0692170088,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),106,3.7341169531,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),74,4.7556590363,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),133,2.8600700151,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),130,2.94363867,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),127,2.9039941706,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),146,2.2382729086,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),75,4.5772205125,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),63,4.780528288,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),63,4.9654981811,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),115,3.2780570089,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),118,3.2182920858,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),117,3.2569323726,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),134,2.7051214391,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),132,2.8015886189,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),43,5.1868989621,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),45,5.0212575733,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),56,5.0871191561,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),68,4.7628834021,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),87,4.5466145248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),60,4.8587288031,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),36,5.2670387129,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),42,5.3527735981,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),14,5.9545310585,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),17,5.7991371937,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),7,6.1668706929,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),125,3.0329161044,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),135,2.6980203078,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),123,3.1661406145,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),107,3.7389167984,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),104,3.7603488746,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),112,3.8014682547,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),33,5.3427923118,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),29,5.3420973699,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),34,5.4917750137,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),63,4.8124081018,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),70,4.6577685881,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),68,4.8836276558,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),5,6.2643682646,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),4,6.2451304777,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),5,6.2731769056,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),80,4.4746350396,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),81,4.4103808388,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),72,4.7772907812,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),86,4.3594468012,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),79,4.4342879685,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),77,4.6544368744,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),136,2.7071849369,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),117,3.2389871141,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),120,3.3068901629,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),94,4.1323015433,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),95,4.0426054531,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),98,4.1658070276,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),116,3.2768123838,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),129,2.8500044314,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),126,3.1200278463,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),110,3.4953214783,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),87,4.276156448,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.B,B. Readiness subindex (1-7),97,4.1983653025,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),86,3.4126185172,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),133,2.647059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),58,3.7876378909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),46,3.8637888688,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),52,3.67076795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),5,4.8168925355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),3,5.0495158895,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),3,5.083937,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),127,2.767018,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),131,2.6457105676,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),140,2.4657885484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),124,2.8365971975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),108,3.1303429485,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),111,3.0399041641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),50,3.9310286077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),58,3.6795294,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),57,3.619525368,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),26,4.2245734127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),50,3.8201093113,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),47,3.7196813544,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),24,4.2469478193,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),19,4.3928356681,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),14,4.3684265417,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),140,2.343085513,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),139,2.3505275988,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),138,2.5644830178,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),36,4.0810854583,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),25,4.0952353377,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),45,3.7435350343,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),38,4.0712558571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),62,3.6582113385,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),100,3.1744690827,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),88,3.4005664316,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),88,3.3500134988,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),94,3.2359565429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),117,2.9745587101,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),134,2.5747627581,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),142,2.3817108994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),77,3.5107424697,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),81,3.4485677878,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),90,3.3235464179,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),17,4.4253890327,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),20,4.3906968276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),24,4.1198718745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),109,3.159194,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),94,3.26550075,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),89,3.352479,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),125,2.822801,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),107,3.2162108313,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),79,3.4704032238,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),74,3.4663556192,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),52,3.8833382833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),53,3.760751986,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),69,3.4894637544,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),39,4.0609004605,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),34,3.9758310183,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),54,3.6436562878,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),23,4.2655872955,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),18,4.397097463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),10,4.4637504205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),48,3.69963,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),57,3.8085146367,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),65,3.6367594134,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),67,3.5108455844,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),35,4.0855158011,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),47,3.8458093582,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),55,3.628673028,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),14,4.4500656206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),22,4.2677044722,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),36,3.91599679,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),47,3.9822429509,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),37,3.9423850373,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),27,4.007304525,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),16,4.4386738899,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),16,4.4302978119,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),13,4.3810845952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),121,2.9294996424,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),86,3.3807556161,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),43,3.757663652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),79,3.4912639071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),43,3.9002329276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),38,3.8971989091,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),45,4.0014078807,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),52,3.7781447478,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),49,3.6929068959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),44,4.005237818,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),42,3.904862312,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),41,3.7822546979,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),64,3.6807933745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),75,3.5146830171,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),66,3.5249111235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),37,4.0735049593,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),55,3.7071833685,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),72,3.4719289993,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),81,3.454637239,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),122,2.9475182598,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),124,2.8223752427,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),29,4.1803404331,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),21,4.2962064297,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),17,4.2584289633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),20,4.3376418132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),63,3.6501952068,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),87,3.3639503169,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),94,3.3253256093,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),93,3.2851415517,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),80,3.4261758905,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),137,2.4082700174,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),142,2.1618198708,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),127,2.7452892633,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),83,3.4301268051,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),60,3.669502,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),29,3.9785548167,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),104,3.2502287725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),95,3.2543082995,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),116,2.9884559496,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),85,3.4137702929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),89,3.3361197722,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),102,3.16559038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),25,4.242916,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),35,3.9715225157,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),34,3.9328624282,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),55,3.8319428875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),59,3.674757475,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),61,3.5841433873,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),8,4.6660019559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),14,4.4508796913,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),21,4.2186686316,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),48,3.9743082582,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),49,3.8234425122,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),60,3.5970375215,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),117,3.045384,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),91,3.2861047103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),49,3.9329906154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),45,3.8888478769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),56,3.6236330909,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),76,3.5324125043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),61,3.664097,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),62,3.5781286858,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),95,3.315487113,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),87,3.3623715509,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),64,3.5567199624,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),77,3.494326,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),112,3.0332029241,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),21,4.3325827238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),13,4.4631706169,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),18,4.228566973,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),113,3.0087853977,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),130,2.6630715381,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),141,2.436500581,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),118,2.9612661813,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),119,2.982185764,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),113,3.0320096059,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),74,3.5478173353,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),78,3.4752510936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),39,3.8084254674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),27,4.2067739032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),31,4.0119098875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),19,4.2279557884,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),80,3.454690568,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),104,3.1407272503,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),125,2.8207024511,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),122,2.8955444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),129,2.7467473632,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),136,2.5924132235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),138,2.39584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),140,2.3411213202,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),135,2.5972822484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),90,3.374862929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),110,3.1270512915,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),114,3.0312239016,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),34,4.1126311,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),29,4.0440746379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),25,4.1190772,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),78,3.4996110023,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),83,3.4331488324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),92,3.2802355961,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),82,3.4334473876,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),80,3.4610975324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),70,3.4833977453,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),61,3.7024406678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),66,3.6289361568,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),73,3.4669106297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),18,4.3606710949,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),30,4.0343784241,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),53,3.6637513353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),6,4.7874096826,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),6,4.6441417061,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),9,4.5206463919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),114,3.0060616923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),121,2.9482817218,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),129,2.7392525785,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),102,3.2613411678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),120,2.9680168906,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),128,2.7396793471,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),70,3.5906720683,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),69,3.5983653333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),51,3.682593,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),32,4.1246771414,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),48,3.829900425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),37,3.9133065858,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),93,3.360352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),71,3.5732731467,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),58,3.6135560357,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),63,3.6836668829,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),76,3.5091019333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),79,3.4331965585,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),136,2.4104672652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),138,2.36660485,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),144,2.2668884925,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),40,4.0574457626,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),24,4.1343355198,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),46,3.7318835588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),31,4.1287413833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),33,3.999426,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),31,3.9711642972,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),97,3.3032275943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),123,2.9429931253,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),120,2.9421622027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),44,3.748233,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),141,2.3272072103,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),141,2.2574268372,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),146,2.1614840909,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),27,4.067257,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),40,3.7999901432,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),118,3.01711,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),143,2.3200710667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),15,4.4400153724,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),7,4.637989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),16,4.300327839,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),123,2.8397421057,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),133,2.5797118661,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),131,2.6703136833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),96,3.3065925143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),96,3.2416959976,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),109,3.046127249,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),7,4.7160175759,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),8,4.59543695,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),11,4.4483148588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),87,3.4100701433,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),85,3.3923768146,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),101,3.1688654769,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),59,3.735673,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),72,3.5706836687,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),96,3.2303457934,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),132,2.6160206141,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),136,2.5633515455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),139,2.5487780325,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),101,3.2763376858,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),111,3.1028626764,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),86,3.365664004,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),75,3.5476648478,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),67,3.625711787,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),63,3.561808004,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),110,3.1060839794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),102,3.1768799784,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),81,3.4223991363,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),65,3.639597673,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),54,3.7322278584,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),59,3.6056701041,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),19,4.3389717444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),44,3.8935553273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),35,3.9226718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),145,2.197158,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),33,4.1233764803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),40,3.9185685987,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),32,3.9460525377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),89,3.3802835091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),100,3.2085086012,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),106,3.0778519754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),60,3.7190658945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),84,3.4171936207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),95,3.2309083691,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),131,2.6580881344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),82,3.4345130732,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),104,3.1023362941,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),62,3.6883866935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),74,3.5206928688,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),75,3.45603595,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),73,3.5633834,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),91,3.32837056,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),83,3.4099254121,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),4,4.9130084386,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),4,4.9045795398,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),4,4.8474921622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),67,3.6197995231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),90,3.3288236904,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),97,3.2279601602,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),105,3.2460252227,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),64,3.6472476879,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),77,3.4438818629,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),134,2.5781204278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),116,3.0507588412,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),78,3.4364809205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),22,4.2825868016,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),23,4.216104187,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),26,4.1076819751,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),43,4.0165634639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),28,4.0639500156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),20,4.2212736902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),133,2.58298922,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),132,2.5947748462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),132,2.658285,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),71,3.575821817,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),57,3.6927349028,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),65,3.5565447261,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),12,4.496859434,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),17,4.4295203635,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),12,4.431911,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),91,3.3649982609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),109,3.1271119125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),110,3.0456394333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),46,3.9898851948,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),11,4.4869559079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),7,4.5403688038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),98,3.3028248023,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),99,3.2201852398,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),98,3.2163563123,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),126,2.8178928,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),107,3.1374139,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),85,3.375985867,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),100,3.2937970676,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),101,3.1860326881,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),103,3.1499778024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),69,3.5926390318,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),56,3.6931714888,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),82,3.4169962156,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),28,4.1996563908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),36,3.9514873578,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),50,3.6845592674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),128,2.7609029922,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),125,2.904664277,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),122,2.8771836696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),1,6.180519,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),1,5.7650931667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),1,5.5694673183,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),111,3.0851830412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),114,3.0806382594,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),99,3.2058043393,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),99,3.2983563851,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),124,2.9425206474,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),108,3.0674044619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),13,4.4672355082,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),10,4.498612,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),5,4.6957994909,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),3,4.925155,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),5,4.7740234308,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),6,4.5976145927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),30,4.1653457932,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),51,3.7923108728,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),42,3.7643318875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),2,5.3968673745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),2,5.2700617394,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),2,5.141203472,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),103,3.165655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),84,3.39915475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),119,2.9386473286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),113,3.0955991935,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),71,3.4806986692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),92,3.3633438348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),115,3.071443075,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),123,2.8378470799,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),120,2.937714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),126,2.8369785183,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),117,2.9847442241,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),129,2.7552351429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),127,2.8340853493,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),134,2.6462990022,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),84,3.42826,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),106,3.1379540427,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),121,2.9256278981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),10,4.512306871,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),12,4.4845012367,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),22,4.1587217,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),135,2.5383336421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),137,2.4952634198,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),107,3.0772810675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),38,3.93674,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),33,3.9348796698,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),116,2.9824431393,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),115,2.993473349,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),112,3.1017344321,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),126,2.7766332667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),72,3.5680977632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),98,3.2293543923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),105,3.0782772752,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),51,3.9009123789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),26,4.0893818657,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),106,3.2293141967,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),92,3.3154760273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),88,3.3599438841,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),108,3.1879759143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),128,2.7521344996,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),130,2.722191335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),42,4.0297411711,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),115,3.0067689389,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),56,3.8104229078,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),32,4.0064572348,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),23,4.1206142989,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),11,4.5108994707,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),9,4.5649259101,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),8,4.5227875901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),68,3.616500618,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),73,3.545639066,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),76,3.4534587079,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),66,3.6217892505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),68,3.6123626348,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),68,3.5057100885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),112,3.0850655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),97,3.232316262,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),118,2.9807838687,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),54,3.8565627584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),70,3.5747220896,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),93,3.2435927121,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),9,4.6633199612,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),15,4.4422900374,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),15,4.3377321307,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),139,2.3682544723,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),144,1.9512104321,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),148,1.8705383226,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),41,4.03535164,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),39,3.9233495,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),30,3.9765011512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),142,1.905293,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),143,2.0726865238,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),147,2.077321896,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),103,3.2559877,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),105,3.1390794382,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),119,2.946124675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),53,3.8579955343,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),41,3.9139240286,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),28,3.9846455564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),130,2.7283722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),135,2.5726252333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ074,2.09 Government procurement of advanced technology products (1-7),137,2.5894431868,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),142,1.7800764031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),148,2.15625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),69,4.1526328622,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),61,4.2950354313,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),84,4.09603505,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),38,4.7408884925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),27,4.9973277704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),28,5.087221,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),22,5.1233848421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),34,4.8889851892,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),33,4.9141392683,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),131,3.0658676584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),127,3.1850614613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),120,3.4282520564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),15,5.3764860615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),16,5.2719153143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),29,5.05400304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),34,4.7939161397,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),37,4.7894665258,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),40,4.7389004338,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),125,3.2456541169,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),123,3.2830095497,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),134,3.1157188583,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),137,2.6496772087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),136,2.7839082462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),142,2.6013284535,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),1,6.1212876389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),2,6.0168541881,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),2,5.9535989964,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),56,4.3587581964,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),53,4.3833054692,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),73,4.2556348356,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),98,3.7037916595,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),105,3.6743533136,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),110,3.6471944398,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),90,3.869883512,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),91,3.874667271,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),105,3.7085784204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),102,3.6788942137,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),101,3.7455477463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),112,3.6418394209,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),60,4.297346938,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),79,4.1140416069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),85,4.0901706896,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),71,4.139566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),50,4.4438832,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),41,4.69287,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),120,3.368485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),122,3.3275584306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),120,3.379559751,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),126,3.3147768877,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),61,4.2950270476,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),52,4.4245407832,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),49,4.5426267718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),26,5.0473296461,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),21,5.1593290615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),26,5.1153235707,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),64,4.2186774144,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),58,4.3124119074,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),52,4.4962060872,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),111,3.646032,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),95,3.7224023505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),92,3.8739104649,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),97,3.8094634144,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),4,5.8225566138,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),5,5.7416007881,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),7,5.6920258619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),3,5.9754858416,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),3,6.0126677266,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),1,6.0907958433,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),14,5.3912298453,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),14,5.3861848549,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),16,5.3463777375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),59,4.3033439096,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),68,4.2170396907,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),83,4.1138530952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),96,3.7177447087,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),83,4.0710311857,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),62,4.3485995665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),65,4.2104811091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),46,4.5258133586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),48,4.5649407301,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),53,4.4004421383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),74,4.1488766043,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),70,4.2813852551,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),119,3.3746063153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),114,3.4684443534,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),116,3.5431620064,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),20,5.1871306511,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),19,5.2162318948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),17,5.3451106745,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),47,4.5924732737,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),30,4.9645082989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),18,5.3025327359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),82,3.9633108052,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),95,3.8244487025,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),90,3.9529004981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),36,4.775136616,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),32,4.9452313838,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),27,5.0965311707,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),19,5.2226649162,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),25,5.0842455882,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),25,5.1532671169,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),89,3.8923043041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),88,3.9181481034,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),106,3.7057295714,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),101,3.6803076522,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),131,3.0270348667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),135,2.9995865357,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),93,3.7520596622,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),94,3.841608,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),77,4.2152875111,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),133,2.9504219583,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),137,2.7530398557,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),145,2.2948741835,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),6,5.7091271875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),4,5.7896927747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),4,5.82946,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),48,4.564812875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),48,4.4929858798,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),54,4.4837703362,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),91,3.8122686125,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),108,3.628491375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),118,3.5257328203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),16,5.3263382147,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),10,5.5515832304,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),10,5.6361105158,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),5,5.7306161519,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),8,5.6324267038,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),5,5.8007634019,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),130,3.11496,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),127,3.2968210467,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),2,5.9793892308,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),1,6.0592751923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),3,5.8875779545,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),115,3.4399322559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),110,3.573955,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),107,3.687932826,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),72,4.1363877568,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),65,4.2584543043,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),51,4.5150611322,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),139,2.739704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),144,2.4630337276,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),39,4.7225394751,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),31,4.9475272118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),46,4.5950197276,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),104,3.6506347824,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),104,3.6762124595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),94,3.8461433506,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),44,4.639966175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),43,4.6073744609,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),38,4.7500553183,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),74,4.0781460765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),64,4.2644549006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),50,4.536211058,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),21,5.1564941806,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),17,5.2609209375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),14,5.3928591814,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),113,3.480253263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),109,3.5894779158,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),123,3.3598725546,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),83,3.9381782,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),87,3.931546902,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),78,4.1967511342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),136,2.708366,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),140,2.7331229765,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),130,3.2284510717,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),77,4.0343727573,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),81,4.0802066614,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),68,4.306505334,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),68,4.177883,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),70,4.1840977241,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),58,4.4468029314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),30,4.9193600635,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),33,4.9260897135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),30,5.0256076454,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),29,4.9286735485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),23,5.1373523568,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),19,5.267394547,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),94,3.740053731,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),93,3.852015788,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),95,3.8436311132,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),11,5.4747854204,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),18,5.2490137379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),22,5.2093869011,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),17,5.2743313471,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),40,4.6885683898,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),42,4.6845650351,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),35,4.7917359253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),35,4.8283876391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),31,4.9759832279,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),63,4.2388303314,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),77,4.1287777648,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),69,4.2961024426,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),85,3.9155730619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),55,4.34463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),47,4.576362,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),57,4.3208595331,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),80,4.1039267486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),86,4.0354752049,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),109,3.57321,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),103,3.6907465644,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),96,3.8173793952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),46,4.6127977951,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),56,4.3399050185,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),57,4.4490438038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),132,2.9781071225,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),141,2.67588195,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),139,2.704168295,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),112,3.5224111972,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),96,3.7793923797,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),108,3.6731292206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),50,4.4959998278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),42,4.6518278667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),56,4.4502824492,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),99,3.7001885481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),102,3.7222920276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),92,3.8916425622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),82,4.120216,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),18,5.2558485346,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),13,5.3906834372,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),13,5.4059693506,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),69,4.212922,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),117,3.5372714865,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),144,2.272252,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),146,2.1935645333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),40,4.7202878897,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),38,4.77416,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),37,4.7729498171,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),134,2.9294901268,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),134,2.8462546738,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),122,3.3721249538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),66,4.2027682048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),57,4.3287209686,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),60,4.3680228541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),58,4.3086027831,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),60,4.3054038438,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),55,4.4504312647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),67,4.1962785796,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),67,4.2278555766,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),59,4.3786504615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),51,4.480132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),47,4.5245254567,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),45,4.5965905508,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),124,3.2643459606,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),121,3.3499078,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),133,3.1991869538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),103,3.6760968663,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),90,3.8950656135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),87,4.0192223205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),49,4.5452210603,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),51,4.4423750446,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),65,4.325537391,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),100,3.6964078572,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),106,3.6614060877,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),99,3.7892042988,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),118,3.3905771697,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),122,3.3372950221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),119,3.4312350204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),32,4.8446962444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),28,4.9937952364,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),21,5.23374437,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),141,2.665501,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),45,4.6173742943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),59,4.3066007584,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),36,4.804900839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),135,2.8486828364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),132,2.9880426,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),136,2.8643945708,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),121,3.3293535246,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),133,2.9461635586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),137,2.8478956135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),139,2.5384866214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),138,2.7431787562,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),143,2.4727611471,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),87,3.9126348899,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),76,4.1297634274,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),61,4.3626563917,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),81,3.9635090333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),100,3.748388936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),124,3.3319166991,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),27,5.0273692792,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),26,5.0193419271,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),35,4.8520473811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),129,3.1120554769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),129,3.1204452427,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),121,3.4200776224,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),80,3.9732515034,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),86,3.9396897542,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),102,3.7463111756,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),111,3.5546288835,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),98,3.7691674353,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),103,3.7163880397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),10,5.5167089677,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),9,5.6205340018,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),9,5.6606861254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),28,4.9529652857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),24,5.0936047156,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),20,5.2420917203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),126,3.239426755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),113,3.511263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),100,3.76751045,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),24,5.0613812064,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),20,5.2127664481,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),24,5.1564505685,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),97,3.7060998304,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),107,3.6346076703,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),88,3.995149,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),79,4.0159787098,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),71,4.1791724792,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),72,4.2667510083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),105,3.6217367277,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),82,4.0775871918,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),63,4.3406763635,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),43,4.6652392805,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),49,4.4596008655,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),67,4.3088205204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),55,4.3802474229,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),39,4.6998901533,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),39,4.7452593674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),78,4.0273654029,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),85,3.9712121243,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),89,3.9635978309,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),52,4.4582284885,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),44,4.567602441,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),44,4.6031929953,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),25,5.0540386372,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),22,5.1483716494,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),11,5.5150861744,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),130,3.1047662005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),124,3.2701069034,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),132,3.2114090029,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),7,5.691771,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),7,5.6770621106,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),8,5.6635532345,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),92,3.7612059959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),112,3.5326177958,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),104,3.714543808,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),107,3.5895982127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),115,3.4604992248,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),113,3.635217622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),84,3.9361675425,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),73,4.158121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),91,3.9292881008,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),42,4.686591,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),45,4.5658771538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),64,4.3403299902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),37,4.7552908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),41,4.6720845576,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),43,4.6208652781,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),8,5.643910535,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),6,5.7172540909,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),6,5.7485304439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),126,3.225528,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),131,3.2253652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),88,3.8930025214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),99,3.7588818726,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),93,3.8488953923,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),114,3.4790541205,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),116,3.458995775,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),114,3.6194545688,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),75,4.059331,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),63,4.2685489493,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),80,4.1458157552,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),106,3.6058568071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),111,3.5697496589,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),109,3.6511967802,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),54,4.386054,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),66,4.2539650417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),74,4.249898425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),9,5.544204442,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),11,5.4176369083,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),15,5.3830757689,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),138,2.6281727316,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),135,2.8211987165,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),128,3.2812433747,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),84,4.023704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),75,4.2252732571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),108,3.5891540684,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),127,3.2254103267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),128,3.1658532509,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),140,2.689040342,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),73,4.1100439149,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),62,4.2768928615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),53,4.4953340267,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),128,3.1653156472,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),119,3.3981572258,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),141,2.1420333115,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),143,2.3272937894,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),147,2.1935126072,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),33,4.8264675762,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),36,4.7956752936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),34,4.8682078555,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),31,4.9070947194,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),66,4.3100142317,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),110,3.5728374325,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),97,3.7792069963,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),101,3.7642127447,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),23,5.1096544827,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),29,4.9729000087,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),32,4.9239099262,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),117,3.3988423079,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),118,3.4208470901,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),129,3.2646220911,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),86,3.914513167,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),89,3.8967113696,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),98,3.7935505213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),116,3.41709785,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),117,3.4382298573,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),115,3.6013363272,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),41,4.6913517155,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),54,4.3567076074,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),79,4.1695998676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),12,5.4434137979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),12,5.3967004078,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),12,5.4878608442,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),62,4.2573325904,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),72,4.1716756571,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),76,4.2183278645,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),123,3.30151158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),125,3.22627925,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),125,3.3181367024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),140,2.358456,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),142,2.4260193714,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),138,2.815053468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),13,5.43148385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),15,5.2801602941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),23,5.1701073935,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),76,4.04626216,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),75,4.1476578242,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),71,4.279254705,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),70,4.1397062333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),78,4.1268047667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ131,2.08 Quality of management schools (1-7),81,4.1414388694,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",131,3.70984,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",128,7.49504,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",94,18.37739,2004,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",57,43.91056,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",50,54.8536,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",86,22.46028,2003,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",84,25.2,2000,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",87,25.2,2008, ,UNESCO Science Report 2010, +2012,ARG,Argentina,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",20,68.67273,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",21,71.23081,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",17,74.82966,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",47,51.52984,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",52,48.94158,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",59,46.04359,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",12,75.91419,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",10,79.91686,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",8,83.24341,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",35,60.20413,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",23,68.19172,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",25,70.99989,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",92,19.26004,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",92,19.30422,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org, +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",96,19.64731,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",135,3.24715,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",134,3.24715,2002,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",143,3.16599,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",21,67.46295,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",22,70.59052,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",27,69.26048,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",120,6.03499,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",102,13.31398,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",111,12.36512,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",134,3.33067,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",132,3.86165,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",138,4.56077,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",108,10.58834,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",111,10.58834,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",109,13.15282,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",44,53.01785,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",43,56.86403,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",41,59.62523,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",49,51.20631,2010,,UNESCO,11/11/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",77,33.45658,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",69,35.90328,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",68,38.08804,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",71,37.74196,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",90,21.48828,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",62,38.64902,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",66,38.64902,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",72,37.6887,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",68,36.072,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",83,25.63098,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",86,25.63098,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,24/06/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",24,65.92925,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",33,61.82678,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",37,60.84252,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",98,17.24591,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",91,19.63317,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",90,24.33869,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",124,8.74056,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",118,7.43551,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",121,7.43551,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",130,7.43282,2006, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",36,59.99095,2002,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",37,59.99095,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",43,58.88373,2000, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",48,51.45253,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",47,54.82052,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",51,54.33827,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",37,59.17578,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",25,66.11951,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",26,70.51935,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CHN,China,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",84,24.34619,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CHN,China,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",82,25.94633,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CHN,China,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",91,24.32841,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",114,8.86656,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",118,8.27813,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",125,8.35915,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",107,11.47777,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",104,12.44654,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",115,11.90675,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",61,39.13494,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",61,42.89573,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",60,45.01903,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",96,17.83059,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",90,20.42981,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",94,20.60955,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",80,25.55299,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",60,42.98364,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",56,46.74096,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",46,52.00389,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",48,54.63591,2004,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",57,46.53973,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",34,60.65055,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",30,63.54322,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",30,64.58364,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",46,56.52802,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",14,74.39921,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",15,74.39921,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",19,73.58181,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",72,34.00459,2004,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",73,34.00459,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",76,34.00459,2004, ,World Bank;World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/12/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",74,30.76359,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",76,32.09236,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",78,31.46411,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",60,39.83806,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",64,39.83806,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",69,38.92361,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",75,30.43758,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",75,32.36732,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",79,28.7532,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",17,73.24268,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",12,78.14737,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",9,82.61555,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",29,62.69846,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",29,64.27314,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",24,71.65114,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",123,5.46112,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",120,7.63732,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org, +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",126,8.19105,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",2,91.59335,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",3,93.67794,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",2,95.53667,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,FRA,France,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",41,54.53309,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,FRA,France,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",44,56.69268,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,FRA,France,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",45,57.0639,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org, +2014,GAB,Gabon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",131,7.24163,1999, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",39,58.52579,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",38,59.74994,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",34,61.16683,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",77,28.24805,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",77,30.01974,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",82,27.93352,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",115,8.80031,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",105,12.13954,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",112,12.19913,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",110,11.27035,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",123,8.79166,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",129,4.1172,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",129,4.1172,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",139,4.47064,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",3,89.3785,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",5,89.3785,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",4,91.39059,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",97,17.8271,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",97,17.8271,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org, +2014,GTM,Guatemala,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",99,17.87513,2007, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",105,11.88882,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",107,12.03469,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",110,12.91051,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",40,57.2,2009,,UNESCO via Partner Institute,11/11/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",35,60.38241,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",39,60.1254,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",93,18.82065,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",89,20.61886,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",95,20.5588,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",50,49.174,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",50,54.13295,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",44,58.80533,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",33,61.68492,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",34,60.65308,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",42,59.50613,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",87,22.35115,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",86,23.11997,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",84,27.20455,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IND,India,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",101,16.23348,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IND,India,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",96,17.86739,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IND,India,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",92,23.27124,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",30,62.54118,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",24,66.17154,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",21,73.47068,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",57,42.77336,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",53,48.58076,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",48,55.16453,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",15,74.09565,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",11,78.56117,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",10,80.94236,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",31,62.4802,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",32,62.4802,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",33,62.37535,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",23,65.9829,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",28,64.98491,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",31,63.85777,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",81,24.95699,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",81,26.00868,2012,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",85,25.99444,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",58,41.83822,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",69,37.7403,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",66,39.93893,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",38,59.01899,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",39,59.74193,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",40,59.92406,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",63,38.47675,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",58,43.18553,2004,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",61,44.52599,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",130,4.02637,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",131,4.02637,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",141,4.04812,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",52,48.80689,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",62,41.34548,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",64,41.34548,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",117,7.8372,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",101,14.49954,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",104,15.83411,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",1,103.87252,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",1,103.11111,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",1,100.8,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",89,21.86206,2004,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",88,21.86206,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",93,22.30059,2004, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2000,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",102,17.08848,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",43,54.02364,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",41,57.65213,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",58,46.26451,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",93,19.07806,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",97,19.40065,2000, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",49,54.3548,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",36,60.87731,2003, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",99,17.1,2007,,Partner Institute,11/11/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",99,15.45685,2011,,"Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, Republic of China",29/11/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",107,14.39976,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",133,3.51853,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",133,3.51853,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",117,10.82567,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",11,77.36905,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",17,73.98034,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",14,76.60441,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",109,10.53276,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",112,10.53276,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",98,18.20522,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",22,66.1028,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",36,60.1008,2003,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",28,67.28473,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",103,13.21557,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",103,13.21557,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",103,16.15857,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",64,38.14536,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",65,39.44804,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",70,38.20207,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",132,3.69269,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",130,4.09437,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",140,4.08571,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",79,27.0381,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",80,28.02544,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",83,27.68683,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",59,40.42233,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",67,38.61698,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",65,40.75877,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",121,5.7997,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",124,6.0994,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",129,7.47441,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",73,33.36772,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",71,35.30945,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",68,39.44448,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2003,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",108,13.81368,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",55,44.91723,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",55,47.64347,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",47,55.53195,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",45,52.14075,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",42,57.15578,2008,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",35,61.10051,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",138,1.46001,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",126,4.88503,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",137,4.85041,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",127,4.35742,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",128,4.35742,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",135,5.14448,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",82,24.86343,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",74,32.44538,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",67,39.86482,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",139,0.51005,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",139,0.819,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",147,0.81415,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",65,37.45536,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",63,40.23617,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",73,37.13453,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",113,8.95581,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",116,8.95581,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",121,9.3296,2008, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",110,10.25899,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",113,10.25899,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",118,10.40504,2005, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",95,17.97182,2003,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",95,17.97182,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",100,17.85635,2003, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",28,62.70366,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",27,65.40536,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",15,76.41607,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",16,73.79431,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",16,74.35696,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",22,73.08579,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",122,5.56272,2004,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",122,7.26092,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",106,14.49029,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",7,82.72621,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",8,82.55537,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",11,80.78135,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",83,24.46909,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",78,28.67675,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",81,28.13726,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",124,5.36118,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",117,8.32041,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",120,9.52802,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",56,44.64583,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",56,45.74574,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",63,41.78192,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",70,34.99135,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",59,42.98712,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",62,42.63866,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",76,28.88682,2008,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",79,28.22816,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",80,28.19964,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",19,70.53748,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",19,72.35174,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",20,73.5097,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",6,86.01882,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",6,86.17682,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",5,86.46033,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",32,62.19675,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",26,65.48737,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",29,65.94793,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",67,36.64326,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",72,34.56097,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",75,34.51367,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",112,9.96832,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",108,11.6063,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",113,12.14547,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",25,63.76617,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",40,58.83583,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",53,51.59729,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",13,75.88788,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",14,75.88788,,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org, +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",16,75.47462,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",125,4.81628,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",123,6.60315,2002,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",132,6.90233,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",66,36.76054,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",70,36.76054,2010,,"Ministry of Education, Singapore",29/11/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",55,50.93608,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",116,7.9183,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",119,7.9183,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",127,7.62999,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",26,63.6,2009,,Statistics Singapore. See PDF original file,11/11/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",20,72,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",23,72,2011, ,Economic Development Board ,04/06/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",138,2.10034,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",136,5,2011, ,"National source: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", +2012,SLV,El Salvador,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",85,22.99299,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",85,23.44575,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",89,24.51857,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",51,49.08272,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",51,50.36518,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",52,52.37703,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",104,12.08971,2002,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",106,12.08971,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",114,12.07816,2002, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",42,54.15651,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",46,54.84256,2002,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",49,55.07142,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",5,86.92523,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",4,89.58426,2006,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",6,85.08911,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",18,70.78167,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",18,73.76567,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",18,73.94509,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",126,4.42599,2006,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",127,4.42599,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",133,5.96363,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2006,,World Bank;World Development Indicators 2009;http://data.worldbank.org/products/data-books/WDI-2009,29/11/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",146,1.39189,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",78,27.4,2009,,Ministry of Higher education via PI,11/11/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2005,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",136,2.16841,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",136,2.3175,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",145,2.25039,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",53,46.16911,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",54,47.69904,2008,,"UNESCO Science Report 2010, p.272",29/11/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",54,51.40475,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",91,19.66623,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",94,18.73875,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",100,16.66467,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",98,16.66467,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",101,17.73506,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",106,11.51686,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",109,11.51686,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",116,11.51686,2005, ,World Bank;World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,05/12/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",71,34.39674,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",74,35.19931,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",54,45.81872,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",45,55.42347,2009,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",38,60.6836,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",8,82.17,2009,,"Ministry of Education, Education Statistics (Annual Report), R.O.C",11/11/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",7,83.37,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",7,83.37,2011, ,"Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education", +2012,TZA,Tanzania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",137,1.46037,2005,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",137,2.10809,2011,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",142,3.91904,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",128,4.18811,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",115,9.14781,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",122,9.05573,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",9,79.46975,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",9,81.70206,2007,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",12,79.70165,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",27,63.28326,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",31,63.19859,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",32,63.15235,2010, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,USA,United States,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",4,89.08218,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,USA,United States,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",2,94.80865,,,, +2014,USA,United States,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",3,95.33196,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",10,78.12849,2009,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",13,78.12849,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",13,77.90962,2009, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",88,22.2903,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",87,22.2903,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",88,24.59961,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",111,10.18778,2007,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",114,10.18778,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",119,10.28643,2011, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",102,15.41356,2006,,World Development Indicators 2009,11/11/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",100,15.41356,2010,,UNESCO;UNESCO Institute for Statistics;www.uis.unesco.org,29/11/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",105,15.41356,2006,as used in GCI 2011-2012 ,World Bank;World Development Indicators database (October 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi,30/12/1899 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",,,n/a,,n/a,11/11/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",135,2.40786,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",144,2.39038,2000, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",119,6.18733,2010,,United Nations Education; Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO); UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data Centre,11/11/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",125,5.99968,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,ENROL3GR,"2.07 Tertiary education gross enrollment rate, %",134,5.94417,2012, ,UNESCO; UIS;http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx ,05/12/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),142,3.1655480813,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),148,2.823529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),122,4.0312508976,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),128,3.857393725,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),144,3.41822505,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),19,5.6047722019,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),15,5.6946406809,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),17,5.709416,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),105,4.25763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),117,4.0734585405,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),134,4.0089687837,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),139,3.3601220994,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),130,3.8484163681,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),102,4.5814071692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),7,5.8697992231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),6,5.8517185429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),13,5.821542328,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),8,5.7999991206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),7,5.8299136901,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),11,5.8300507868,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),133,3.7915397205,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),131,3.8239659393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),128,4.1700287194,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),113,4.1530409565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),140,3.5330379225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),146,3.2901418594,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),2,5.9645567667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),4,5.9619451033,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),6,5.9725953402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),93,4.5390527036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),93,4.4753018923,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),89,4.742560623,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),130,3.8855034063,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),105,4.2585625778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),116,4.3891566051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),92,4.5404129418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),83,4.6581859387,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),74,4.9259765822,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),99,4.4390736784,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),101,4.327251839,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),101,4.5814113433,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),25,5.4537369404,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),33,5.3769255241,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),40,5.3279116858,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),132,3.818619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),138,3.6015098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),143,3.423875,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),107,4.224078,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),134,3.7584974388,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),135,3.7053366503,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),137,3.8332468274,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),48,5.1609448935,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),45,5.1405403662,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),70,4.9819351618,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),68,4.8778051132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),70,4.8575195486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),50,5.2123945854,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),63,4.9528431663,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),71,4.8303110741,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),62,5.0820197744,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),96,4.686965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),75,4.7534715156,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),74,4.7995846753,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),93,4.728597709,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),21,5.5753288777,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),19,5.6274416129,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),33,5.4336906297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),24,5.4572476048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),20,5.5868774142,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),21,5.6094293367,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),36,5.3606598,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),39,5.2605057882,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),37,5.37524555,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),22,5.5484270713,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),37,5.302448603,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),46,5.2630925,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),83,4.6295717725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),78,4.7213876696,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),72,4.9697743538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),90,4.5610372506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),97,4.4163592552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),92,4.728644421,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),85,4.6089694358,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),79,4.7161818813,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),64,5.0604553735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),126,3.9575355566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),122,4.0192279555,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),122,4.3212198681,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),65,4.9484670213,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),60,4.9554771254,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),52,5.2034959373,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),30,5.3903478469,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),43,5.1484921522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),47,5.2487486965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),16,5.6412950208,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),13,5.7097146557,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),12,5.8261917981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),9,5.7950348147,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),8,5.7859945572,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),10,5.857121771,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),46,5.1651919471,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),29,5.4236404286,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),27,5.4774461229,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),60,5.0108024959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),56,5.0011394828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),75,4.9203337,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),131,3.8789149478,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),144,3.1450706625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),141,3.5633689286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),109,4.1989115908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),103,4.293048,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),112,4.4904063183,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),114,4.1392632618,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),121,4.0241127753,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),131,4.0646396015,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),23,5.4906815464,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),23,5.5164862639,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),28,5.4767163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),29,5.39664295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),25,5.5020603899,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),22,5.5922092073,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),125,3.9716778375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),139,3.591809675,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),133,4.032087443,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),71,4.7980986618,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),68,4.8712528783,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),86,4.7826945368,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),12,5.7121507586,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),28,5.4742514693,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),26,5.5187483048,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),132,3.798693,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),129,4.1668882897,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),3,5.9254732308,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),5,5.9585928462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),3,6.0384182727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),128,3.9006828287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),127,3.868511,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),123,4.3172360935,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),67,4.8984490627,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),53,5.040980735,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),68,5.0162165906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),116,4.077403,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),132,4.0558366138,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),86,4.5887517072,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),82,4.6645231236,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),84,4.8116798086,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),82,4.6404762324,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),95,4.4246800994,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),87,4.7544832931,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),50,5.1372078438,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),46,5.1111041379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),53,5.2000348858,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),79,4.7035071235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),59,4.9605835029,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),69,4.9870323757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),14,5.6787202839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),9,5.7758823625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),7,5.9162996163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),98,4.4517307878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),89,4.5543990883,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),104,4.5585361957,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),115,4.08859425,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),120,4.0446520784,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),107,4.5239048471,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),135,3.727952,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),134,3.7080567925,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),140,3.6719926141,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),39,5.3271898084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),38,5.2738851608,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),43,5.280555423,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),89,4.57629755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),96,4.4191805747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),66,5.0254498514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),31,5.3857043538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),34,5.3768983892,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),24,5.5516201314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),59,5.0264028557,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),40,5.2253598613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),42,5.2928143162,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),106,4.2437331548,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),106,4.2554031851,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),121,4.3374319956,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),76,4.7414324803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),84,4.6380452155,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),83,4.8377468929,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),27,5.4393112587,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),66,4.913591648,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),95,4.6892937757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),58,5.0368753989,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),67,4.8982389911,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),73,4.9512402023,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),72,4.766593572,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),65,4.9218567953,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),55,5.1951150824,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),34,5.3638693952,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),31,5.3949257524,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),44,5.27226,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),4,5.9194363908,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),2,6.0476139306,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),1,6.2421292615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),117,4.055426,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),113,4.1255392133,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),120,4.3469977476,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),66,4.9217404732,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),63,4.9319066037,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),35,5.3867762226,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),127,3.9163208573,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),123,4.01333185,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),124,4.281003165,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),88,4.5776510363,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),72,4.8081289537,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),78,4.8969247647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),15,5.6462627333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),11,5.7455556667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),8,5.8860394994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),80,4.6954018311,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),81,4.6953810954,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),110,4.5072190919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),56,5.18403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),28,5.433175171,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),35,5.3746475395,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),25,5.5369339558,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),87,4.562788,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),103,4.5672657622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),115,4.085731,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),139,3.7293683333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),35,5.3627391931,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),26,5.495887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),20,5.6132812707,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),108,4.203986865,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),118,4.064001656,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),94,4.724998322,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),64,4.9503341444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),48,5.1002999227,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),36,5.3822544153,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),41,5.2450197373,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),58,4.9920818438,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),59,5.1248304088,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),81,4.6922912127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),69,4.860087873,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),34,5.3950784103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),53,5.098116,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),57,4.9949246642,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),60,5.1204009213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),104,4.3549676944,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),108,4.2284410273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),119,4.3549790821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),112,4.154046284,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),100,4.3567902618,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),82,4.8488898257,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),84,4.6160931674,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),75,4.7636851873,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),65,5.0467927726,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),110,4.1741819082,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),119,4.0538280975,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),85,4.795628407,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),95,4.4806665881,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),110,4.192927274,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),111,4.4983469265,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),11,5.7789319889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),10,5.7633705636,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),4,6.0080252,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),97,4.610421,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),121,4.0326928204,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),114,4.0911571987,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),135,3.8654327221,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),96,4.4798426273,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),86,4.6052520828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),98,4.6035929696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),129,3.8987571923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),133,3.7561491172,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),126,4.1978664747,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),137,3.4116807817,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),125,3.9283432693,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),108,4.5200966176,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),57,5.038139472,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),42,5.1516585247,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),30,5.4557107083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),101,4.3790467267,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),126,3.9146266,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),125,4.2714540233,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),26,5.4458213797,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),36,5.3627783807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),32,5.4365389649,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),87,4.5784116359,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),91,4.5365392994,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),99,4.5939088062,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),73,4.7644120715,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),92,4.534401171,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),76,4.913309569,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),118,4.051048846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),129,3.8566732765,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),136,3.8375321445,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),6,5.8739739581,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),1,6.0733398787,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),5,6.0046189396,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),32,5.3783843025,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),32,5.3886215025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),39,5.3401715392,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),123,4.029089305,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),112,4.1549488462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),109,4.50945705,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),45,5.1674912904,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),24,5.5074296811,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),31,5.4387831087,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),54,5.0976794613,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),47,5.10099435,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),54,5.195165,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),91,4.5406794529,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),85,4.6218612,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),79,4.889935225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),43,5.1990560715,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),55,5.0146717251,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),71,4.9699050274,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),55,5.0928254644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),49,5.0948008784,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),61,5.0985764154,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),47,5.1640349371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),50,5.09350404,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),63,5.0705926537,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),38,5.337801878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),30,5.4166236926,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),38,5.347422828,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),20,5.5914085189,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),17,5.6700255448,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),9,5.8585603781,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),56,5.0623685017,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),62,4.9368997482,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),77,4.9025694465,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),100,4.4203896046,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),73,4.8045583356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),57,5.1812468493,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),5,5.884892,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),12,5.7360830288,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),16,5.7595730594,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),97,4.4577039979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),102,4.3039050438,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),115,4.3990953881,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),124,3.9865247054,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),124,3.9642945316,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),113,4.4860979822,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),102,4.3692302644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),98,4.392456,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),90,4.7358643438,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),17,5.629323,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),14,5.7069377692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),18,5.685625053,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),61,5.0094087974,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),52,5.0560699783,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),58,5.1319513115,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),33,5.377356635,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),21,5.5437542545,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),19,5.6440947,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),136,3.680207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),130,4.12419835,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),40,5.3044569214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),64,4.9248716968,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),105,4.5528218897,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),136,3.6051492248,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),137,3.61452345,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),138,3.8271516437,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),70,4.830166,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),76,4.7482037859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),91,4.7345821149,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),37,5.3545800714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),27,5.4777101027,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),29,5.472317967,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),51,5.121793,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),41,5.2002707531,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),49,5.2316869288,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),10,5.7825274072,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),22,5.5345150807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),23,5.5661187746,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),119,4.0404160632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),111,4.175569356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),117,4.3597334855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),90,4.544955,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),100,4.5932121937,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),44,5.1697961995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),141,3.1868217745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),142,3.300260795,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),145,3.3431255203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),52,5.1180291588,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),54,5.02936475,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),41,5.3161417329,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),116,4.0849193588,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),107,4.2336704429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),138,3.4015984951,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),141,3.4231618864,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),142,3.4945209116,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),69,4.8659197286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),88,4.5620978899,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),88,4.7441560173,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),42,5.2282137801,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),80,4.865145994,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),13,5.698320644,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),16,5.6855802439,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),15,5.791869857,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),1,6.0688966571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),3,6.047419942,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),2,6.1159860199,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),111,4.1619751303,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),109,4.2105149194,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),127,4.1826967984,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),78,4.7068380352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),77,4.7270334728,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),67,5.0219744131,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),120,4.03531725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),104,4.279989569,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),106,4.5367491263,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),103,4.3668954957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),99,4.3628441018,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),114,4.4646186578,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),18,5.6090150154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),18,5.6466438774,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),14,5.818868392,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),140,3.3376625181,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),143,3.2691988893,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),147,3.0435770323,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),62,4.96921116,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),44,5.1483867,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),51,5.2061171659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),77,4.738501,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),80,4.7023620286,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),118,4.357566196,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),49,5.150528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),51,5.0664208471,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),45,5.2639788022,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),74,4.76391774,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),61,4.9539842857,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),48,5.2330465441,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),94,4.5104000333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),94,4.4497780333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ099,2.06 Intensity of local competition (1-7),81,4.8547770926,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2013,AGO,Angola,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,14,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,142,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,123,11,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,139,15,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,144,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,136,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,132,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,139,15,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,144,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,136,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,1,1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,1,1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,1,1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,132,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHN,China,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHN,China,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,126,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,14,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,142,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,132,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FRA,France,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FRA,France,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,123,11,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,126,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,132,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,126,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,126,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IND,India,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IND,India,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,11,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,126,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,,,,23/10/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,123,11,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,1,1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,1,1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,1,1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,142,16,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,144,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,136,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,86,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,132,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,137,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,129,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,3,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,126,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,133,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,72,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,11,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,20,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,22,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,94,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,88,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,79,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,110,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,10,3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,8,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,121,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,139,15,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,144,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,139,16,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,74,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,,,, +2014,USA,United States,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,USA,United States,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,143,17,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,148,17,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,140,17,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,114,10,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,119,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,58,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,30,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,28,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,48,6,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,34,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,46,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,102,9,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,107,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,STARTBUSPROC,2.05 No. procedures to start a business,97,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,137,66,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,132,68,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,8,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,12,4.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,103,25,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,93,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,9,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,2.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,97,25,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,103,25,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,97,28,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,37,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,15,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,66,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,8,4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,9,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,8,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,62,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,68,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,19,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,57,10.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,80,19,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,77,18,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,86,18,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,18,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,43,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,51,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,42,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,119,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,124,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,119,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,122,44,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,128,50,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,132,49,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,125,50,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,141,119,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,146,107.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,138,119,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,77,18,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,86,18,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,139,101,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,144,101,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,135,101,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,114,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,133,61,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,135,60,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,129,61,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,15,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,77,18,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,86,18,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,18,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,19,5.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,112,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHN,China,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,118,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHN,China,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,116,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,105,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,69,15,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,71,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,62,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,66,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,54,11,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,51,11,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,132,60,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,102,24,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,128,60,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,87,20,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,94,19.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,86,20,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,69,15,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,75,14.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,71,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,19,5.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,19,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,89,18.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,80,19,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,97,25,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,103,25,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,92,25,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,129,56,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,134,55.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,126,56,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,105,28,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,101,23,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,97,28,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,32,6.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,69,15,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,42,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,67,14,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,70,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,66,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FRA,France,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,32,6.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FRA,France,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,131,58,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,133,50,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,62,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,63,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,56,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,70,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,116,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,16,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,103,27,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,96,27,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,54,11,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,70,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,47,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,123,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,94,19.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,115,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,87,20,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,96,20,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,93,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,2.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,4,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,67,14,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,70,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,66,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,43,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,140,105,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,143,97,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,137,105,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,15,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,8,4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,127,47,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,131,48,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,124,45,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,103,27,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IND,India,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IND,India,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,62,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,16,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,12,4.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,90,21,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,70,14,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,109,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,56,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,63,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,94,23,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,100,22,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,89,23,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,19,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,63,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,80,19,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,114,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,33,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,47,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,136,85,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,145,104,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,133,85,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,19,5.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,114,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,105,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,141,92,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,43,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,51,9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,42,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,12,4.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,120,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,112,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,95,24,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,112,29,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,119,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,87,20,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,32,6.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,88,22,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,19,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,89,18.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,80,19,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,72,16,,,,23/10/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,67,12.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,74,16,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,56,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,43,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,37,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,42,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,43,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,42,9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,4,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,123,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,128,39.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,139,72,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,47,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,56,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,62,13,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,68,13,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,19,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,92,19,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,80,19,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,120,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,129,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,117,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,135,66,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,137,66,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,130,66,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,114,34,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,111,28,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,109,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,120,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,123,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,117,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,9,4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,37,7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,106,29,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,85,17,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,1,1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,1,0.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,1,1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,34,8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,40,8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,90,21,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,98,21,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,87,21,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,33,8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,103,25,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,93,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,118,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,120,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,112,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,108,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,113,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,105,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,2.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,116,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,120,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,112,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,43,9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,8.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,8.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,66,14,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,77,18,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,15,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,104,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,2,2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,4,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,90,21,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,97,20.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,10,5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,5,2.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,4,3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,56,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,63,12,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,75,17,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,84,16.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,75,17,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,56,12,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,62,11.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,143,694,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,148,208,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,140,694,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,72,16,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,89,18.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,18,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,72,16,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,16,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,71,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,129,56,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,126,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,126,56,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,120,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,127,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,13,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,134,62,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,136,62,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,130,66,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,106,29,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,110,27.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,95,24,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,90,24,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,138,94,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,142,94,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,136,103,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,126,41,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,125,37.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,121,43,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,58,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,51,11,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,22,6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,49,10,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,10,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,47,10,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,107,26,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,99,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,112,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,114,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,109,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,93,22,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,98,21,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,90,24,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,25,7,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,32,6.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,24,7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,,,, +2014,USA,United States,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,15,5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,USA,United States,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,16,6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,142,144,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,147,144,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,139,141,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,114,34,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,119,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,122,44,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,123,40,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,129,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,53,12,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,81,19,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,92,19,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,80,19,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,75,17,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,32,6.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,76,18,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,137,90,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,140,90,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,STARTBUSDAYS,2.04 No. days to start a business,134,90,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",124,52.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",116,53.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",73,38.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",48,31.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",70,38.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",6,14.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",7,14.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",5,14.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",142,108.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",147,107.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",139,108.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",75,38.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",77,38.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",79,40.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",107,47.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",108,47,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",104,47.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",120,53.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",125,52.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",115,53.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",77,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",81,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",74,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",118,53,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",122,51.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",98,46.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",124,57.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",130,57.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",119,57.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",131,65.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",139,65.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",128,66,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",93,43.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",99,43.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",86,43.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",60,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",62,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",55,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",34,28.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",31,27.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",29,28.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",4,13.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",5,13.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",8,15,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",19,24.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",24,25.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",21,25,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",47,33.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",140,83.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",145,83.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",136,80,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",136,69.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",141,68.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",130,67.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",101,45.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",87,40.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",11,16.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",10,16.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",12,16.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",87,40.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",22,25.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",23,25.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",13,19.4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",25,26.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",21,24.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",32,28.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",37,30.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",38,29.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",35,30.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",30,28.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",31,27.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",21,25,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",127,63.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHN,China,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",135,63.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHN,China,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",124,63.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",76,39.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",107,46.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",92,44.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",109,49.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",112,48.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",106,49.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",139,74.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",144,76,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",135,74.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",71,37.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",74,37.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",68,37.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",122,55,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",129,55.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",117,55,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",17,23,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",18,22.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",19,23.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",110,49.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",110,48.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",106,49.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",106,46.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",114,49.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",101,46.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",28,27.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",29,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",26,27.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",89,42.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",97,43.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",83,41.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",137,72,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",142,71.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",134,72,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",56,34.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",57,33.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",58,35.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",90,42.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",94,42.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",86,43.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",73,38.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",131,58.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",71,38.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",132,67.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",114,49.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",120,58.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",47,33.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",54,33.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",37,31.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",81,40.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",80,39.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",72,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",130,65.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FRA,France,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",136,64.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FRA,France,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",127,65.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",92,43.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",97,43.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",64,35.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",58,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",66,37.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",10,16.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",11,16.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",11,16.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",49,33.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",19,22.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",48,33.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",138,73.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",146,91.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",143,283.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",148,283.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",140,283.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",99,44.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",100,44,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",99,46.4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",83,40.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",89,40.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",79,40.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",67,36.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",51,32.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",63,36.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",17,23,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",19,22.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",18,23,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",79,40.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",78,39.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",90,44,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",44,32.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",12,19.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",43,32.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",82,40.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",83,40.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",78,40.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",114,50.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",118,49.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",112,52.4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",54,34.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",49,32.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",53,34.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",125,61.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IND,India,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",134,62.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IND,India,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",121,61.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",24,26.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",25,25.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",24,26.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",96,44.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",101,44.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",91,44.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",46,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",41,29.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",42,31.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",39,30.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",41,29.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",38,31.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",134,68.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",138,65.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",132,68.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",102,45.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",103,44.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",96,45.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",30,28.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",37,28.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",27,27.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",112,50,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",118,49.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",106,49.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",33,28.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",36,28.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",31,28.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",98,44.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",102,44.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",109,49.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",135,68.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",54,33.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",133,69,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",15,22.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",15,21.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",17,22.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",36,29.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",33,27.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",34,29.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",2,10.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",4,12.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",9,15.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",28,26.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",37,30.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",45,30.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",36,30.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",26,27.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",27,26.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",47,31.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",113,50.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",128,55.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",138,105.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",9,16,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",9,16,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",10,16,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",94,43.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",96,43.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",89,43.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",12,21,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",13,20.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",14,20.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",68,36.6,,,,23/10/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",68,35.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",69,37.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",111,49.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",117,49.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",109,49.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",40,31.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",83,40.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",39,31.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",66,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",67,35.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",64,36.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",117,52.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",126,53.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",113,52.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",1,9.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",1,8.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",2,9.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",116,51.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",116,49.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",111,51.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",85,41.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",90,41,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",113,48.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",14,22.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",14,20.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",16,22.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",21,24.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",22,24.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",20,24.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",53,34.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",75,37.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",51,34.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",133,68.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",140,68.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",131,68.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",32,28.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",35,28.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",21,25,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",57,34.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",61,34.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",30,28.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",20,24.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",69,36.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",49,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",16,22.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",16,21.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",3,9.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",51,33.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",56,33.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",44,32.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",128,65,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",137,64.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",129,66.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",78,40.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",79,39.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",76,40.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",85,41.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",86,40.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",82,41.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",42,31.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",46,31.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",41,31.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",49,33.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",59,34.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",52,34.4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",13,22,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",17,22,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",15,22,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",63,35.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",60,34.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",58,35.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",87,42,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",85,40.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",94,45.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",80,40.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",70,36.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",77,40.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",104,46.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",104,44.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",100,46.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",95,43.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",91,41.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",86,43.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",115,50.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",120,50.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",123,63.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",90,42.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",93,42.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",85,43.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",60,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",62,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",55,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",3,11.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",3,11.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",4,11.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",97,44.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",95,42.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",93,44.4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",121,54.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",120,50.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",103,46.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",41,31.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",41,29.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",39,31.3,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",5,14.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",6,14.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",6,14.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",103,46,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",111,48.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",97,46,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",27,27.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",30,27.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",25,27.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",43,32.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",50,32.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",60,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",76,38.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",55,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",52,34,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",73,36.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",49,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",29,27.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",33,27.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",28,27.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",108,47.9,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",109,47.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",105,48.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",57,34.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",51,32.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",54,34.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",118,53,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",123,52,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",114,52.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",69,36.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",71,36.5,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",65,36.8,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",23,25.7,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",25,25.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",73,39.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",129,65.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",143,73.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",126,65.4,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",72,37.6,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",40,29.8,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",67,37.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",141,84.5,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",137,84.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",7,15.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",2,11,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",1,0.2,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",35,29.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",38,29.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",33,29.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",133,62.4,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",122,62.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",84,41.2,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",82,40.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",81,41.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",59,34.8,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",62,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",60,35.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",100,45.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",105,44.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",95,45.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",70,37.1,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",72,36.6,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",62,35.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",123,55.4,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",127,54.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",118,57.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",87,42,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",92,41.9,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",84,42,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",105,46.7,,,, +2014,USA,United States,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",106,46.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,USA,United States,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",101,46.7,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",126,62.7,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",132,61.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",124,63.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",54,34.5,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",65,35.2,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",75,40.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",45,32.9,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",53,32.7,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",45,32.9,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",47,33.3,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",44,30.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",46,33.1,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",8,15.2,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",8,15.1,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",6,14.5,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",65,35.8,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",66,35.3,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CORPTAXRATE,"2.03 Total tax rate, % profits",60,35.6,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),140,1.4940837719,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),119,2.117647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),124,1.95658905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),132,1.8449239313,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),136,1.8591316,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),13,3.9734355206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),8,4.1436121487,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),10,4.123291,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),129,1.9095614211,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),135,1.8223704324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),142,1.7459991751,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),109,2.1360963925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),89,2.3690442951,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),93,2.425792959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),21,3.5395387154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),28,3.3358869143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),19,3.562962272,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),43,2.9340406286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),39,3.0052599086,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),55,2.8345915765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),54,2.7529625651,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),59,2.7637260932,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),52,2.851105125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),142,1.4207039043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),143,1.5853429663,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),137,1.8565038257,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),20,3.54771135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),23,3.5287402358,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),26,3.3391634467,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),87,2.33761245,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),102,2.2401359231,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),113,2.1798190314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),138,1.5887701506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),136,1.8203720099,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),147,1.67669225,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),94,2.2611717418,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),122,2.010329,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),125,2.0252666395,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),66,2.6035031361,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),58,2.7651544805,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),65,2.6908037821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),8,4.1698383088,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),7,4.2721192,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),15,3.825199134,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),125,1.950673,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),127,1.92980545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),131,1.912732,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),134,1.813493,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),48,2.8896306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),30,3.2799736788,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),32,3.2430541863,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),52,2.8018572782,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),51,2.8214240119,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),61,2.7232485701,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),93,2.2886938342,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),94,2.3114316193,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),98,2.3673895561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),42,2.9356530767,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),35,3.144685037,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),24,3.3944328615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),107,2.247575,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),46,2.9254648514,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),47,2.9205065,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),57,2.796101703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),19,3.6462574755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),20,3.6262462995,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),23,3.4281249038,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),18,3.6518739201,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),19,3.6293681929,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),22,3.4403238333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),34,3.1055696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),31,3.2072637353,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),31,3.2703407875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),22,3.5044969798,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),22,3.5317673366,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),16,3.763996619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),139,1.5338454122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),140,1.7136872179,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),116,2.1288638728,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),116,2.0689025201,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),108,2.1950038655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),112,2.1819894755,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),49,2.8826827398,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),53,2.8183302605,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),75,2.576550649,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),105,2.162819091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),99,2.2613382948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),100,2.3198276191,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),102,2.1814861574,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),101,2.2420140052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),103,2.2855968559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),32,3.1696761742,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),45,2.9383152275,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),54,2.8380394049,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),85,2.355806374,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),84,2.4100198563,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),74,2.5889845019,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),37,3.0152311153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),34,3.1588305324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),33,3.2309345478,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),24,3.4212056809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),69,2.6071469832,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),95,2.3972758106,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),113,2.1048180845,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),111,2.1831414828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),86,2.4659978619,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),110,2.1236852696,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),138,1.7786640167,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),123,2.043274402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),96,2.2396008122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),68,2.611125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),34,3.2194390175,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),41,2.9713564652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),40,3.002801868,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),51,2.9002214421,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),59,2.701851775,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),75,2.4977158845,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),105,2.25750674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),31,3.2413117833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),33,3.1588894607,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),30,3.2818866542,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),120,2.0256581917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),118,2.0670996,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),114,2.1469785722,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),9,4.1614319309,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),13,3.9129432348,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),11,4.0477794211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),36,3.0347751713,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),57,2.7677076244,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),49,2.9331963167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),100,2.255324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),124,2.0322220411,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),23,3.4331659231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),16,3.7670336615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),20,3.5009640909,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),97,2.2388660505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),104,2.233366,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),106,2.2558945213,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),123,1.9756632426,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),116,2.0911990957,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),67,2.6536842779,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),142,1.618704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),141,1.7872272586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),63,2.6571885028,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),66,2.6258670966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),85,2.4834926957,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),103,2.1797756085,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),134,1.8261080774,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),146,1.7044927563,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),64,2.637782875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),64,2.6668901006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),60,2.7556809698,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),83,2.3798498941,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),52,2.8207013746,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),38,3.1779947724,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),5,4.3742144065,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),2,4.46336335,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),1,4.5725775698,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),80,2.4274784939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),79,2.4533015538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),82,2.5200140553,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),108,2.14032215,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),112,2.1402354809,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),110,2.2167338021,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),141,1.441992,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),144,1.4942427559,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),135,1.8633823277,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),117,2.0647432763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),115,2.0987726327,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),122,2.0516583314,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),17,3.6723777,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),21,3.5638251736,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),17,3.73293844,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),27,3.3695504171,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),26,3.3978170757,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),27,3.3155750039,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),106,2.1561078454,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),88,2.3757067532,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),69,2.6504718103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),133,1.8287934755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),129,1.8990251945,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),139,1.8195914214,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),70,2.5786103182,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),65,2.6482010379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),68,2.6520423962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),2,4.455100187,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),3,4.4510304827,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),8,4.1862217405,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),98,2.2331320033,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),121,2.0252808972,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),138,1.8394292331,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),127,1.9307428288,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),130,1.8741167375,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),130,1.9302555647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),62,2.6720469222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),48,2.909955419,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),45,2.998426,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),47,2.9117456326,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),42,2.9598443444,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),39,3.1299954088,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),92,2.293939,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),105,2.2292379067,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),72,2.6073161095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),28,3.2944417561,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),32,3.1816525778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),47,2.9652177208,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),136,1.7940470427,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),133,1.83876135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),133,1.890898665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),61,2.6733164978,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),44,2.9440691921,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),43,3.0202277353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),100,2.19164505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),110,2.1887874,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),115,2.1319579564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),25,3.4204657283,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),41,2.974240154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),71,2.6095147216,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),66,2.659809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),60,2.6986319636,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),63,2.7209909395,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),62,2.7205952805,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),25,3.399556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),63,2.7153149351,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),93,2.315422,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),128,1.9668268,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),51,2.8112913931,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),107,2.197764,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),91,2.4536695537,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),130,1.8589950927,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),131,1.8500791238,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),81,2.5303271167,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),101,2.1828547619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),86,2.3837892574,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),84,2.4891667306,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),11,4.093808906,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),12,3.9237348063,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),13,4.0169981206,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),55,2.7394630255,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),43,2.9452001197,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),58,2.7833816923,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),30,3.264382,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),38,3.0220626239,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),56,2.8040953902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),126,1.9455442592,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),117,2.0674508091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),118,2.1185780974,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),72,2.5734863858,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),71,2.5371618989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),89,2.4562401631,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),78,2.4553364741,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),67,2.6229142184,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),76,2.5759920137,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),65,2.6195296284,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),91,2.3489530515,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),90,2.4552091889,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),119,2.0335763344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),92,2.329712274,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),99,2.3268088724,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),39,2.9880691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),36,3.1075072909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),37,3.20024712,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),148,1.466607,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),29,3.2804253962,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),29,3.2941682338,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),36,3.2032468519,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),137,1.7635228455,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),139,1.7271249065,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),144,1.7132833474,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),122,1.9801362383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),128,1.9293612414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),121,2.0829417051,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),135,1.7992960595,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),119,2.0578922327,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),132,1.9101073824,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),53,2.7839414786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),56,2.7931145823,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),46,2.9775459542,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),131,1.83739026,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),125,1.974103808,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),96,2.3743308112,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),10,4.1324377655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),11,4.0337407651,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),7,4.1950333378,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),76,2.4715431795,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),82,2.4249005701,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),88,2.4575995242,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),104,2.1638647802,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),72,2.5286210748,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),101,2.3070726085,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),111,2.1187738432,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),61,2.7259905765,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),29,3.2853682507,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),14,3.9168905355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),15,3.7784484905,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),21,3.4784518911,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),3,4.4466209496,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),6,4.3341960033,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),4,4.3179648797,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),99,2.20706041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),83,2.4125541538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),102,2.2887271,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),26,3.4120501213,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),24,3.5266905774,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),18,3.5637651011,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),16,3.8548423138,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),14,3.8133997351,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),14,3.867119,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),45,2.9272949563,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),55,2.7994345458,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),77,2.5754821125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),33,3.1514489992,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),17,3.6900266135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),12,4.0318105087,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),38,3.0142113839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),46,2.9300842105,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),50,2.9041215253,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),71,2.57833928,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),62,2.7244634733,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),40,3.0588013559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),79,2.4303102682,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),90,2.3618766248,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),104,2.2747639783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),56,2.7259512041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),54,2.8067207858,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),48,2.9374046469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),73,2.5581490833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),97,2.276487106,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),109,2.2196700581,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),69,2.5820741607,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),70,2.5599046425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),97,2.3703819217,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),1,5.389427,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),1,4.6840383924,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),2,4.4637469262,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),77,2.4584508619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),76,2.4954820854,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),92,2.436916603,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),88,2.3342112481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),85,2.3998906054,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),70,2.6130957025,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),40,2.9759943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),27,3.361852,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),35,3.2140431008,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),7,4.183138,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),18,3.6892209538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),25,3.3715726235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),90,2.3200248068,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),114,2.1049871,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),108,2.243640149,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),4,4.3744078058,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),4,4.3870000606,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),6,4.240489811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),141,1.633756,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),145,1.70739495,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),89,2.3269112214,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),95,2.2939162581,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),59,2.7684978513,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),121,2.024127682,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),126,1.9349342,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),129,1.9325094663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),128,1.920467,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),123,2.0004935887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),126,2.0243420747,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),68,2.5849839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),60,2.7617779137,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),64,2.6918651341,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),84,2.369925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),113,2.1194160597,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),127,2.0054437423,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),6,4.3372669101,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),5,4.375707356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),5,4.3038733885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),118,2.0604746632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),120,2.0518538198,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),53,2.8416722904,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),81,2.431223,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),42,3.0512114698,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),107,2.147166325,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),81,2.4015183053,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),124,1.9895129963,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),143,1.7425995754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),50,2.8559023833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),49,2.8959612,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),41,3.0545037801,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),57,2.710224794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),50,2.893829804,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),86,2.3467025344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),103,2.2364096924,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),87,2.4618343725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),58,2.7094853,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),87,2.3830782659,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),111,2.1849898742,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),35,3.0861192547,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),44,3.0111710485,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),82,2.3922734157,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),73,2.5133569872,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),83,2.5029201782,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),15,3.8840357158,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),9,4.1377987333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),9,4.145597373,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),74,2.5524326944,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),80,2.4440426346,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),73,2.597314267,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),95,2.2558038549,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),74,2.5014922152,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),94,2.4099557049,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),114,2.10103665,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),106,2.2035503934,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),120,2.0962724401,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),75,2.534635905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),77,2.4891175117,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),80,2.5380315162,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),12,4.0271577545,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),10,4.1049740632,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),3,4.3403187111,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),112,2.1156455542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),109,2.1926246464,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),117,2.1221251419,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),91,2.31112698,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),96,2.29070465,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),78,2.565254561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),67,2.587327,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),98,2.2628987524,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),134,1.876288328,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),44,2.93289095,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),37,3.0543822853,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),28,3.2940879859,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),115,2.0737390114,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),78,2.4890512549,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),79,2.5388250045,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),132,1.8357834333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),137,1.7943341,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ089,2.02 Venture capital availability (1-7),140,1.7873505636,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),140,3.43759295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),139,3.470588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),75,4.8637943805,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),106,4.3986905281,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),119,4.06571575,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),25,6.103022543,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),23,6.186952374,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),8,6.367054,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),83,4.7589579474,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),109,4.3383481622,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),123,3.9739803937,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),116,4.2165966907,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),101,4.5097826853,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),97,4.4923862923,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),23,6.1274205615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),19,6.2221001143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),23,6.055687168,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),10,6.4098702222,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),13,6.3093931841,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),24,6.0531809765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),87,4.6315097566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),81,4.7582194555,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),65,5.0455627472,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),142,3.1199526609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),144,3.2068684716,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),143,3.2486837802,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),8,6.4658265806,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),9,6.4665092079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),12,6.3245201254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),108,4.3578019107,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),113,4.2361001462,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),131,3.7835917979,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),132,3.8216652329,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),138,3.5514362469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),145,3.196508248,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),95,4.5510533506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),105,4.4194745032,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),101,4.4390324408,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),106,4.380787512,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),98,4.5255101707,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),99,4.4496905522,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),22,6.1460049608,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),24,6.1709598,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),26,5.970156283,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),105,4.390081,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),89,4.64434325,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),76,4.852376,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),92,4.561672,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),136,3.684213759,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),134,3.6449604417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),130,3.7951380767,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),53,5.3902674363,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),50,5.3198287442,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),63,5.0548313112,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),27,6.0543951605,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),28,6.0387368431,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),28,5.9211423463,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),70,5.0070597545,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),65,5.0473228704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),50,5.2284118205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),135,3.660625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),84,4.6955887578,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),93,4.6030927392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),91,4.5838371138,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),14,6.3368791202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),18,6.2545199572,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),19,6.1208988318,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),2,6.6536605612,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),2,6.6329104627,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),4,6.44206191,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),30,5.9709579132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),32,5.9435428529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),34,5.8032603375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),100,4.4523083533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),107,4.3777418251,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),105,4.3604060476,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),80,4.7965299961,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),77,4.7936257357,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),94,4.5162156104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),125,3.9455738695,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),123,4.0093152483,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),111,4.1871805231,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),78,4.8076187223,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),91,4.6287216631,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),96,4.5070479265,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),67,5.0817318466,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),68,5.0055650105,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),78,4.8058431915,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),68,5.0354659319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),57,5.2207623876,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),49,5.2557999696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),41,5.6136595876,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),42,5.533687786,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),41,5.5207238606,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),40,5.6328215974,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),43,5.4767299354,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),53,5.2088249366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),20,6.1750466834,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),17,6.267531014,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),13,6.2878581374,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),9,6.4647572971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),20,6.2161518888,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),29,5.8988456033,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),59,5.1903735505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),60,5.1943083655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),51,5.2200985476,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),122,4.0287726783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),142,3.3741709917,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),144,3.2408962786,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),104,4.3976440367,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),102,4.493404,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),89,4.6042273373,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),110,4.3027749137,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),115,4.2047070701,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),117,4.0950462466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),33,5.9084293125,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),33,5.9124065216,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),33,5.80657802,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),34,5.8902776917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),36,5.8377810258,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),35,5.760141104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),131,3.8410965625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),132,3.8273878,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),126,3.9195921975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),5,6.6085360971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),3,6.5914959913,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),1,6.5482200632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),11,6.4094297975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),16,6.2862251605,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),18,6.1444272823,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),121,4.070092,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),129,3.8789898019,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),7,6.4944951538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),6,6.5110861308,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),5,6.4394676136,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),99,4.4837426287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),94,4.568638,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),100,4.4418616822,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),94,4.5548591172,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),86,4.7262477583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),81,4.7327230758,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),135,3.63827,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),140,3.4692264759,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),77,4.832369905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),71,4.9411427039,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),74,4.8928936687,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),56,5.3473228938,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),58,5.2180361101,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),67,5.023520773,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),48,5.4818570375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),51,5.3030123441,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),48,5.286965055,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),85,4.6578441412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),70,4.9592374324,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),73,4.8969272039,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),12,6.3833593484,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),8,6.4883350375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),11,6.3337170698,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),81,4.7931718619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),78,4.7821611655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),93,4.5445135929,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),51,5.43560385,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),54,5.2430866926,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),59,5.1464960203,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),135,3.697703,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),130,3.8398786488,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),128,3.8928676027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),43,5.519553555,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),55,5.2313336,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),57,5.1827096602,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),74,4.89556755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),72,4.9320579931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),60,5.1397688229,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),47,5.4865160199,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),47,5.3458205568,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),58,5.1747962647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),32,5.9252904804,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),29,6.033438582,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),30,5.8952420427,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),117,4.1812899231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),114,4.2171144556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),121,4.0098809599,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),4,6.6134848015,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),7,6.4974609948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),7,6.3983959005,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),13,6.3394662725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),22,6.1961048061,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),17,6.1894844595,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),71,4.9527048297,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),69,5.0007124514,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),69,5.0057812064,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),44,5.5110510602,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),44,5.4603678664,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),42,5.4686036978,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),42,5.5274968127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),38,5.6870324952,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),36,5.716335,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),15,6.3329438544,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),11,6.3406661778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),14,6.2780921743,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),103,4.414761,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),90,4.6413761378,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),88,4.6208070976,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),72,4.9452093171,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),74,4.9013473074,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),71,4.9530688491,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),138,3.4938303489,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),136,3.62047675,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),138,3.57031149,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),98,4.5372458587,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),79,4.7819424215,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),82,4.7140310147,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),24,6.1111933889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),26,6.1032277333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),27,5.934427152,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),58,5.1978339434,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),66,5.046559177,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),64,5.0483402892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),112,4.150925,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),79,4.8003912318,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),76,4.8591911163,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),86,4.6344801039,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),124,3.950641,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),136,3.5869015216,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),125,3.906066,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),141,3.4076649333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),63,5.1475929724,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),62,5.135173,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),72,4.9436856195,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),126,3.942897652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),126,3.9030708315,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),132,3.7407387694,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),38,5.7140503429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),37,5.7394748834,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),38,5.6846485561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),19,6.2814817301,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),10,6.44612385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),10,6.3400911618,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),69,5.0100776427,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),64,5.0780009985,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),45,5.3429179436,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),65,5.126655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),53,5.2540638075,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),66,5.0413875803,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),112,4.2560233535,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),118,4.1427799636,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),116,4.1067829915,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),130,3.8746151947,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),128,3.8802667112,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),109,4.2891423494,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),61,5.1643146031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),52,5.2636391301,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),61,5.1065693445,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),89,4.617752667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),96,4.557029473,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),80,4.7442891462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),118,4.1278581701,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),99,4.5227695974,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),84,4.6400593714,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),21,6.1544057889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),21,6.2126359455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),22,6.07465007,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),148,2.518319,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),90,4.6023993981,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),97,4.5515093922,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),83,4.6584264701,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),120,4.0905045364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),108,4.3488423041,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),90,4.5984950696,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),113,4.2520179847,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),111,4.268823,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),104,4.3834944893,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),124,3.9647580153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),116,4.1770328542,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),98,4.4582105,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),55,5.3729485405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),48,5.3335911726,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),46,5.3175787875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),111,4.26102702,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),120,4.119445504,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),127,3.8976867448,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),35,5.8216435056,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),35,5.8462926578,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),37,5.6904130351,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),54,5.3759463846,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),61,5.1552803962,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),52,5.2170485627,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),107,4.3605416319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),85,4.7332458439,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),87,4.6212202357,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),127,3.9349645716,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),133,3.7698607059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),133,3.7169398781,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),6,6.5013673403,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),4,6.5261064124,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),9,6.3549165302,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),3,6.6363449345,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),5,6.524958123,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),3,6.4785075538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),114,4.23905505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),112,4.2596873077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),120,4.04312935,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),29,5.9736551149,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),27,6.1006856943,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),21,6.0792883978,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),45,5.5008809225,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),46,5.3571358014,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),56,5.184649,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),93,4.5596678983,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),83,4.7356469667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),79,4.7680502417,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),28,6.0219200116,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),30,6.0295379184,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),31,5.8762246863,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),64,5.1368809563,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),75,4.8639564561,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),85,4.6373888617,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),62,5.1588281714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),56,5.2216405867,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),47,5.3092983577,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),88,4.6198704692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),95,4.5603711153,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),102,4.4269933121,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),26,6.0658677041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),31,5.9691454291,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),25,6.0097632445,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),16,6.3242789423,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),15,6.3015316478,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),15,6.2432671093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),109,4.3056494251,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),100,4.5182132701,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),114,4.1394535884,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),31,5.966663,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),25,6.1173031788,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),20,6.1072200279,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),115,4.2353178247,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),117,4.1611210323,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),107,4.2997174279,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),121,4.0637323751,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),129,3.8673727647,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),124,3.9709846297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),76,4.8350288918,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),87,4.723601,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),62,5.0921172314,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),36,5.816884,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),34,5.901524,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),32,5.8349873598,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),50,5.4491696414,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),49,5.3303844663,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),54,5.2006977323,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),17,6.2978641372,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),12,6.3210842727,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),16,6.2245198439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),140,3.475356,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),137,3.574213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),73,4.9249769786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),88,4.6785723274,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),113,4.1446188179,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),123,3.9917624671,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),127,3.8898537,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),118,4.0670233357,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),101,4.449628,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),110,4.2725947972,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),110,4.2770430138,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),49,5.4551579643,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),59,5.1993644521,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),70,4.9787958681,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),46,5.494574,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),41,5.6301755152,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),39,5.6449425365,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),1,6.8746526667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),1,6.6857183523,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),2,6.5337549402,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),137,3.6462613053,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),131,3.8360917802,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),122,3.9931426446,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),67,5.035696,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),68,5.0162048508,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),119,4.0988124122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),141,3.165430484,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),143,3.2638751862,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),147,2.8921979101,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),82,4.7712604614,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),73,4.9046839231,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),75,4.8648132783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),102,4.4215254482,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),84,4.7343743136,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),134,3.714707623,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),139,3.4973483803,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),146,3.0754977522,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),60,5.1898242524,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),63,5.1091093401,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),55,5.1996474403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),57,5.2795286607,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),77,4.806705891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),52,5.4335186934,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),45,5.3813037256,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),44,5.4191768793,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),37,5.7400276391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),40,5.6453687333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),43,5.4636624539,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),128,3.8843265573,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),122,4.0669846524,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),125,3.9358571513,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),91,4.5679836352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),104,4.4541412739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),108,4.2914833541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),96,4.55079725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),80,4.7639944742,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),106,4.3375632359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),66,5.0889482745,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),82,4.7515449031,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),92,4.549249826,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),18,6.2950963785,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),14,6.3035230274,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),6,6.4267090829,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),97,4.5430058747,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),103,4.4788885036,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),115,4.1365590032,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),133,3.81911112,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),137,3.5572138,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),134,3.6877217024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),139,3.46796,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),141,3.4700248,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),142,3.394103168,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),39,5.6851819,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),39,5.6773721676,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),40,5.5798736576,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),86,4.6411945457,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),92,4.6216835165,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),95,4.5084706626,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),129,3.8753352667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),119,4.1240893333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ067,2.01 Availability of latest technologies (1-7),103,4.4228534132,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),141,2.5688915201,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),147,2.6521425831,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),78,3.9214453631,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),66,4.2152265337,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),65,4.3059684524,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),22,5.0013096571,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),17,5.2491629195,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),13,5.2791666481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),113,3.5749465077,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),110,3.6772315993,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),122,3.6092542471,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),93,3.7745815416,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),72,4.1213980637,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),67,4.2777345882,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),18,5.0680302512,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),21,5.1944728831,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),21,5.1665520997,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),37,4.5332568133,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),31,4.7755067257,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),39,4.7548499432,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),80,3.8551311363,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),86,3.9604989596,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),77,4.1288692409,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),138,2.9287978708,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),139,2.9574158358,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),142,3.0257573769,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),21,5.0061031228,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),18,5.2336977503,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),22,5.1414361801,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),124,3.4265017184,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),123,3.4733354548,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),131,3.4122831177,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),123,3.4497275628,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),122,3.4946626885,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),128,3.4506729698,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),100,3.727639441,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),111,3.676255913,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),114,3.7676010608,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),53,4.2697695733,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),48,4.4996756297,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),50,4.5854991588,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),12,5.1421313277,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),14,5.2724880753,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),27,4.9632764122,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),97,3.7538873698,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),83,3.9933146936,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),83,4.0778491067,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),119,3.500757464,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),135,2.9757967054,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),137,3.1682118418,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),139,3.1964212336,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),121,3.4566415937,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),126,3.4211255602,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),135,3.3265932331,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),35,4.5457331815,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),38,4.6690490589,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),42,4.7482378887,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),76,3.9452496862,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),77,4.0712014155,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),69,4.2495018641,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),123,3.5734389705,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),79,3.8761278763,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),103,3.8017503904,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),107,3.8445517331,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),5,5.2975132325,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),3,5.4737237842,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),3,5.4564384161,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),13,5.1303230062,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),9,5.3244926567,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),12,5.3097565561,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),23,4.987463606,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),20,5.1996966692,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),11,5.3213514879,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),105,3.6944366301,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),105,3.7796580996,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),115,3.7615106809,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),127,3.3839983736,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),113,3.6018796644,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),102,3.8747136712,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),111,3.6138450805,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),107,3.7543035539,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),111,3.8274767485,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),95,3.7584484099,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),95,3.8735673582,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),104,3.8676116243,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),90,3.8037486174,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),92,3.9057372723,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),93,3.9795058361,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),108,3.6184220032,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),94,3.8965862745,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),70,4.2378350879,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),25,4.8573139963,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),26,4.9885366525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),26,4.9779336322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),59,4.2148529718,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),56,4.3554850843,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),60,4.4139708568,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),32,4.6326657217,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),36,4.7055289772,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),31,4.866807099,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),7,5.2424783415,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),19,5.231958097,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),18,5.2135734394,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),73,3.9772246804,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),75,4.0814666289,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),79,4.1153479051,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),137,2.9565461893,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),143,2.7355736037,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),145,2.8681000837,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),110,3.6163281856,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),96,3.8606956763,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),78,4.1208963665,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),94,3.7621839375,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),98,3.8477124397,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),117,3.6904171087,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),30,4.6667087881,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),29,4.8468916433,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),51,4.5398682743,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),36,4.5363975951,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),45,4.5893959983,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),28,4.9329153928,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),99,3.7450607089,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),119,3.5457945986,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),120,3.6379699267,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),4,5.31933657,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),7,5.3392186101,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),9,5.370646065,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),33,4.567215647,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),39,4.6570475,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),47,4.6698742986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),129,3.3664156964,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),137,3.3036013115,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),20,5.0533702179,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),8,5.3340461722,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),10,5.3330559465,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),55,4.2345553807,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),54,4.3851839799,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),59,4.4168608118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),82,3.8501701246,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),84,3.9886161713,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),66,4.2813256786,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),141,2.9118693701,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),144,2.8924404166,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),117,3.5140818557,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),116,3.5832149362,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),125,3.5040034179,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),60,4.2122594179,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),68,4.1635894295,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),64,4.3249648287,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),86,3.8358475164,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),97,3.8512937301,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),74,4.1572809039,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),88,3.8138803872,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),81,4.0164985422,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),71,4.2316305984,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),3,5.3604242414,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),2,5.6075137834,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),2,5.7229452914,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),112,3.5980128639,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),109,3.7164036088,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),118,3.6695457444,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),62,4.1703896563,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),60,4.319115068,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),44,4.6893538748,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),139,2.8641682346,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),142,2.8881880491,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),141,3.0936395276,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),52,4.2744757674,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),51,4.4249230209,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),56,4.441974928,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),64,4.088779884,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),73,4.0950191869,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),62,4.363555693,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),91,3.7954350171,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),99,3.8468749675,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),103,3.8703226481,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),28,4.7458502935,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),24,5.0966919933,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),16,5.2524036419,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),81,3.8540867436,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),80,4.028490859,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),86,4.0446006353,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),19,5.0563645127,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),22,5.1501647272,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),19,5.2080423595,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),10,5.16385765,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),15,5.2585873032,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),14,5.2727958098,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),70,3.990683451,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),69,4.1565562565,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),76,4.1463181745,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),75,3.9549949352,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),82,4.0013662854,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),80,4.0994561588,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),43,4.4545059904,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),40,4.6481419917,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),41,4.7483625898,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),39,4.5328618623,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),37,4.6770843148,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),40,4.7505467008,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),71,3.9874900431,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),64,4.2323496964,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),58,4.4222511632,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),101,3.7275820648,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),106,3.760633276,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),110,3.8275943435,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),131,3.2517596429,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),132,3.3191907544,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),99,3.8862173654,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),106,3.6856806261,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),91,3.9164810971,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),98,3.8987722434,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),15,5.1224208131,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),23,5.1382060947,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),20,5.1865364478,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),61,4.1725379541,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),71,4.1264055661,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),81,4.0852720678,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),97,3.9243111091,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),42,4.5026827052,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),35,4.7289128546,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),48,4.6342058063,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),58,4.335548082,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),75,4.1532964014,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),120,3.5399480353,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),116,3.6938094138,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),85,3.8386555473,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),67,4.2088665188,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),82,4.0783048909,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),115,3.5411626269,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),118,3.5539721999,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),108,3.8428424021,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),49,4.3878750099,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),44,4.6019697496,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),37,4.794168679,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),27,4.7532244043,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),34,4.7342775786,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),29,4.8984699125,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),44,4.421037904,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),42,4.6455743596,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),32,4.8634099848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),66,4.0384014203,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),79,4.0359009354,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),88,4.0328330659,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),89,3.8110876324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),88,3.9394148795,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),105,3.8549271996,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),103,3.7159056852,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),104,3.788731992,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),94,3.9696895507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),77,3.9409975301,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),74,4.0888748593,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),85,4.0720529476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),47,4.3968441496,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),49,4.4815296832,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),46,4.6745472951,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),118,3.5126342995,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),114,3.5883055379,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),119,3.6519148818,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),41,4.5144403417,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),50,4.467070975,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),49,4.6210821874,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),146,2.7069532828,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),38,4.5331405257,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),41,4.6470485151,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),34,4.8560463076,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),69,4.0072837938,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),62,4.2751144829,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),57,4.4269252941,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),116,3.5211293535,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),124,3.4522159162,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),126,3.4874050853,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),140,2.6946906334,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),140,2.9509913516,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),143,2.9537404248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),46,4.403301585,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),46,4.5337010281,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),43,4.7456555488,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),114,3.5623803718,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),131,3.3562884511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),130,3.4312323404,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),24,4.9650951638,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),16,5.2503521972,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),24,5.0679379665,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),87,3.8331324559,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),112,3.6730355695,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),112,3.8091046563,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),104,3.7056716983,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),101,3.8281299799,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),106,3.8536217748,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),134,2.9856582397,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),136,3.1790695226,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),136,3.3131682828,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),17,5.1035708787,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),5,5.3951351996,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),5,5.4431166962,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),16,5.1172562165,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),10,5.3138196954,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),6,5.3846725698,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),122,3.4562653153,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),117,3.5676121329,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),113,3.7831188793,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),14,5.1246621778,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),6,5.3768890984,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),8,5.3724815129,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),31,4.6654977285,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),33,4.7498755255,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),36,4.8419257703,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),96,3.7563093508,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),102,3.8087790388,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),101,3.8763803653,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),48,4.388940845,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),32,4.7585621955,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),35,4.8494279673,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),56,4.2252698055,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),57,4.3448808258,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),61,4.3945040636,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),107,3.6854415163,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),100,3.8351705131,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),92,4.0072259145,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),58,4.2150865231,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),53,4.4069735422,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),52,4.4939531261,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),40,4.5181790962,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),30,4.8311809952,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),33,4.8632342998,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),29,4.7361474056,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),27,4.9113197607,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),25,5.0011585111,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),102,3.7249242978,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),89,3.9280681238,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),96,3.9397126051,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),2,5.3724357699,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),12,5.288790669,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),17,5.2347803397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),68,4.0191743968,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),70,4.1405769518,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),72,4.1975455565,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),83,3.8437342733,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),90,3.9232440815,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),73,4.1707817492,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),57,4.2220760934,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),59,4.3243818152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),55,4.4534623326,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),8,5.2387297221,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),25,5.0654926998,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),23,5.1242464312,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),63,4.1490617023,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),76,4.0794738822,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),89,4.0207987577,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),1,5.5132653678,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),1,5.8027095922,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),1,5.8364221526,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),127,3.3853251484,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),124,3.553678811,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),74,3.9554801897,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),87,3.953145162,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),95,3.9612661298,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),84,3.8416722842,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),85,3.9808277624,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),87,4.0435591436,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),126,3.4017719262,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),125,3.4314469328,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),127,3.4756049532,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),65,4.0877586173,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),61,4.3020872807,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),68,4.2538323636,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),26,4.8077461857,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),28,4.8516250178,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),30,4.8937581891,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),11,5.1532691236,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),11,5.2977878657,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),15,5.2617709733,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),136,2.9639619726,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),138,3.0285708166,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),129,3.442380443,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),63,4.2482943869,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),90,4.0202793707,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),92,3.7897991017,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),142,2.5373058262,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),144,2.5814073559,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),148,2.364631635,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),54,4.2418995242,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),52,4.4169444325,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),45,4.6876356878,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),128,3.3586462187,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),121,3.539142179,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),130,3.265137813,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),130,3.3576836412,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),134,3.3305225194,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),72,3.9854429226,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),93,3.9024566881,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),91,4.0088743417,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),67,4.0278675761,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),109,3.8284000033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),51,4.3288609541,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),43,4.6375532518,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),38,4.7698719915,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),6,5.2823113425,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),4,5.4368567017,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),4,5.454154346,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),129,3.2788931906,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),128,3.3811897959,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),132,3.3944731424,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),120,3.5007286934,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),115,3.5868052514,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),121,3.6133610071,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),98,3.7458446541,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),78,4.070786782,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),84,4.0765256961,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),45,4.420920985,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),47,4.5007278643,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),54,4.462933085,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),9,5.2188025706,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),13,5.2851903499,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),7,5.3839561104,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),133,3.1160790802,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),134,3.2240946345,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),140,3.1509058382,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),109,3.617002621,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),108,3.74730316,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),100,3.8824523766,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),125,3.4158441529,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),133,3.3031802547,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),138,3.3025101941,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),50,4.3695667836,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),55,4.3840610397,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),53,4.477046773,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),34,4.5486096779,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),65,4.2177435388,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),63,4.3279937997,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),132,3.2059645416,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),135,3.217012748,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A.02,Pillar 2. Business and innovation environment (1-7),133,3.3455265103,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2013,AGO,Angola,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,140,1296,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,130,1011,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,25,390,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,69,525,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,26,390,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,72,524,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,68,524,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,70,537,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,87,590,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,87,590,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,84,590,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,49,440,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,80,570,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,48,440,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,29,395,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,26,395,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,30,395,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,31,397,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,29,397,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,32,397,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,5,237,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,6,237,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,5,237,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,120,832,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,121,832,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,118,832,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,62,505,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,58,505,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,59,505,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,117,795,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,119,795,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,114,795,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,51,446,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,47,446,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,49,446,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,141,1442,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,147,1442,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,138,1442,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,79,564,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,77,564,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,75,564,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,99,635,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,102,635,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,96,635,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,90,595,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,90,595,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,87,595,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,124,892,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,88,591,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,88,591,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,85,591,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,111,731,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,114,731,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,107,731,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,137,1340,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,143,1340,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,75,540,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,73,540,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,71,540,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,3,225,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,97,625,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,100,625,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,94,625,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,82,570,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,80,570,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,79,570,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,25,390,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,24,390,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,26,390,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,58,480,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,53,480,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,56,480,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,35,406,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHN,China,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,32,406,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHN,China,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,35,406,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,114,770,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,85,585,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,110,770,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,118,800,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,120,800,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,115,800,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,139,1346,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,139,1288,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,136,1346,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,43,425,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,39,425,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,42,425,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,122,852,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,123,852,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,120,852,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,112,735,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,115,735,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,108,735,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,93,611,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,95,611,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,90,611,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,28,394,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,25,394,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,29,394,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,38,410,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,35,410,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,37,410,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,53,460,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,49,460,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,51,460,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,98,630,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,101,630,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,95,630,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,86,588,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,86,588,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,83,588,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,130,1010,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,132,1010,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,129,1010,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,65,510,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,61,510,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,67,515,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,43,425,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,39,425,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,42,425,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,73,530,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,71,530,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,91,620,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,24,375,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,22,375,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,25,375,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,25,390,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FRA,France,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,26,395,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FRA,France,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,18,331,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,131,1070,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,133,1070,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,32,399,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,44,437,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,33,399,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,12,285,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,11,285,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,12,285,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,59,487,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,56,495,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,57,487,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,10,276,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,9,276,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,36,407,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,33,407,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,47,434,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,119,819,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,141,1300,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,116,819,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,142,1459,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,145,1402,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,139,1459,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,85,581,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,84,581,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,82,581,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,18,360,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,17,360,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,9,280,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,127,920,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,128,920,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,126,920,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,84,572,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,83,572,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,74,561,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,73,530,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,71,530,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,69,530,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,29,395,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,26,395,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,30,395,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,61,498,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,57,498,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,79,570,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,140,1420,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IND,India,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,146,1420,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IND,India,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,137,1420,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,103,650,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,106,650,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,100,650,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,62,505,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,58,505,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,59,505,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,41,417,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,37,417,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,40,417,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,124,890,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,125,890,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,123,890,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,132,1210,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,135,1185,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,131,1210,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,104,655,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,107,655,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,101,655,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,107,689,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,110,689,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,103,689,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,18,360,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,17,360,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,21,360,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,20,370,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,19,370,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,26,390,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,55,465,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,51,465,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,53,465,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,6,260,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,7,260,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,6,260,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,34,401,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,54,483,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,34,401,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,3,230,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,4,230,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,3,230,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,80,566,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,79,566,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,78,566,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,46,443,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,108,721,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,112,721,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,105,721,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,133,1280,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,137,1280,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,111,690,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,136,1318,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,142,1318,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,134,1318,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,94,615,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,97,615,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,112,785,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,9,275,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,12,300,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,8,275,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,15,321,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,15,321,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,17,321,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,56,469,,,,23/10/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,52,469,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,22,369,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,65,510,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,61,510,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,62,510,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,16,327,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,16,337,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,20,352,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,123,871,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,124,871,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,121,871,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,40,415,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,30,400,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,39,415,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,20,370,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,93,604,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,23,370,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,95,620,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,98,620,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,91,620,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,62,505,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,58,505,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,134,1160,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,76,545,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,74,545,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,72,545,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,13,314,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,13,314,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,16,314,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,110,730,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,129,950,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,106,730,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,20,370,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,19,370,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,23,370,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,102,645,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,70,529,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,99,645,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,48,432,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,43,432,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,15,312,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,43,425,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,39,425,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,42,425,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,7,270,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,49,460,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,7,270,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,52,457,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,48,447,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,50,457,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,37,409,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,34,409,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,36,409,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,70,514,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,65,514,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,66,514,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,11,280,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,10,280,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,9,280,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,125,910,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,126,910,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,125,910,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,2,216,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,2,216,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,2,216,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,91,598,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,91,598,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,88,598,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,129,976,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,131,976,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,128,976,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,106,686,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,109,686,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,102,686,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,46,428,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,42,426,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,45,428,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,121,842,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,122,842,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,119,842,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,105,685,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,108,685,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,117,830,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,95,620,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,98,620,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,91,620,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,78,547,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,76,547,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,73,547,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,88,591,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,88,591,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,85,591,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,82,570,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,80,570,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,79,570,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,69,512,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,64,512,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,65,512,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,7,270,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,8,270,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,11,281,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,3,230,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,4,230,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,3,230,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,99,635,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,102,635,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,96,635,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,115,780,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,117,770,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,111,780,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,1,150,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,1,150,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,1,150,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,71,515,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,66,515,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,116,786,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,118,786,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,113,786,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,99,635,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,102,635,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,96,635,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,143,1715,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,148,1715,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,140,1715,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,76,545,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,74,545,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,76,565,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,135,1290,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,136,1270,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,133,1290,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,13,314,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,13,314,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,61,508,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,128,956,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,130,956,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,127,972,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,126,915,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,127,915,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,122,872,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,113,743,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,116,743,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,109,743,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,49,440,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,45,440,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,55,479,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,47,430,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,46,430,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,134,1285,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,138,1285,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,132,1285,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,137,1340,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,143,1340,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,135,1340,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,78,565,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,76,565,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,42,420,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,38,420,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,41,420,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,65,510,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,61,510,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,62,510,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,54,462,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,66,515,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,52,462,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,60,490,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,55,490,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,58,490,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,17,343,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,23,378,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,19,343,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,109,725,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,113,725,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,104,720,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,20,370,,,, +2014,USA,United States,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,19,370,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,USA,United States,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,14,300,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,65,510,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,94,610,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,62,510,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,33,400,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,30,400,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,13,295,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,81,569,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,105,645,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,68,520,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,92,600,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,92,600,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,89,600,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,57,471,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,95,611,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,54,471,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,38,410,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,35,410,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CONTRACTDAYS,1.09 No. days to enforce a contract,37,410,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,134,46,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,46,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,49,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,142,49,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,133,49,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,49,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,142,49,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,133,49,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,4,25,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,4,25,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,4,25,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,124,44,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,44,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,120,44,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,112,42,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,110,41,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,111,41,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,106,41,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,136,48,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,141,48,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,132,48,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,51,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,124,44,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,44,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,123,45,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,134,47,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,138,47,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,130,47,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,138,47,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,31,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CHN,China,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CHN,China,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CHN,China,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,41,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,115,43,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,43,34,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,42,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,41,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,121,43,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,122,43,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,115,43,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,9,27,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,43,34,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,42,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,41,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,129,45,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,131,45,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,123,45,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,106,41,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,FRA,France,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,FRA,France,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,FRA,France,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,12,28,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,49,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,142,49,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,26,31,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,24,31,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,31,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,134,47,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,138,47,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,130,47,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IND,India,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,131,46,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IND,India,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,134,46,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IND,India,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,46,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,1,21,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,1,21,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,1,21,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,9,27,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,110,41,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,106,41,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,24,31,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,124,44,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,44,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,124,44,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,44,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,120,44,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,141,50,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,146,50,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,136,50,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,122,43,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,110,41,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,111,41,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,,,,23/10/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,8,27,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,9,27,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,26,31,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,24,31,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,131,45,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,49,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,142,49,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,133,49,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,31,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,131,46,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,134,46,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,46,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,112,42,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,5,26,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,43,34,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,42,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,41,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,142,51,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,147,51,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,51,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,131,46,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,134,46,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,46,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,31,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,110,41,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,111,41,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,106,41,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,36,33,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,69,37,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,42,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,31,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,121,43,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,122,43,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,115,43,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,31,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,3,23,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,3,23,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,3,24,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,115,43,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,121,43,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,122,43,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,115,43,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,1,21,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,1,21,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,1,21,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,90,39,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,43,34,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,42,34,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,41,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,124,44,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,126,44,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,120,44,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,31,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,31,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,99,40,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,98,40,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,97,40,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,68,37,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,67,37,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,n/a,,n/a,28/10/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,140,55,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,110,41,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,111,41,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,106,41,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,142,51,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,147,51,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,137,51,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,116,42,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,112,42,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,,,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,91,39,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,87,39,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,129,45,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,131,45,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,123,45,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,110,41,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,111,41,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,106,41,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,USA,United States,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,28,32,,,, +2014,USA,United States,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,27,32,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,USA,United States,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,31,32,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,18,30,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,43,34,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,41,34,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,56,36,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,55,36,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2012,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,23/10/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,15,29,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,48,35,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,47,35,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2013, ,World Bank/International Finance Corporation;Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises; www.doingbusiness.org,29/10/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,CONTRACTPROC,1.08 No. procedures to enforce a contract,78,38,2011,,World Bank/International Finance Corporation; Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World,28/10/2011 +2012,AGO,Angola,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,AGO,Angola,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,0,n/a, +2012,ALB,Albania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",77,75,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ALB,Albania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",76,75,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",77,75,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",21,36,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",22,37,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",22,37,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ARG,Argentina,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",70,70,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ARG,Argentina,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",69,69,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",69,69,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ARM,Armenia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",102,89,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ARM,Armenia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",100,88,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",101,88,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,AUS,Australia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",5,24,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,AUS,Australia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",5,23,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",5,23,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,AUT,Austria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",5,24,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,AUT,Austria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",5,23,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",5,23,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",100,88,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",99,87,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",100,87,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BDI,Burundi,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BDI,Burundi,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BEL,Belgium,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,25,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BEL,Belgium,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,24,,,, +2014,BEL,Belgium,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,24,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BEN,Benin,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BEN,Benin,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,90,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,90,,,, +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",104,90,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",60,65,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",61,64,,,, +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",61,64,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,54,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",44,54,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",44,54,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",63,66,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",62,66,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",62,66,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BLZ,Belize,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BLZ,Belize,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BOL,Bolivia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",87,80,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",83,79,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BRA,Brazil,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,54,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BRA,Brazil,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,,,, +2014,BRA,Brazil,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BRB,Barbados,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BRB,Barbados,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",63,66,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",65,67,,,, +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",65,67,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,BWA,Botswana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,BWA,Botswana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",86,80,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",87,80,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CAN,Canada,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,28,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CAN,Canada,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,27,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,27,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",10,26,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",10,25,,,, +2014,CHE,Switzerland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",10,25,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CHL,Chile,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",55,62,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CHL,Chile,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CHN,China,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",80,78,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CHN,China,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",79,77,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CHN,China,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",80,77,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",88,81,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",89,81,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",90,82,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",92,83,,,, +2014,CMR,Cameroon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",93,83,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,COL,Colombia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,54,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,COL,Colombia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",50,58,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",50,58,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",50,58,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",21,36,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",20,35,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",20,35,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,DEU,Germany,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",12,27,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,DEU,Germany,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",12,26,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",12,26,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,DNK,Denmark,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",10,26,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,DNK,Denmark,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,24,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,24,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",78,76,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",77,76,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",78,76,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,DZA,Algeria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",93,83,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,DZA,Algeria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",94,84,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",95,84,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",66,67,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",67,68,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",67,68,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,EGY,Egypt,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,60,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,EGY,Egypt,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,,,, +2014,EGY,Egypt,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ESP,Spain,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",30,43,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ESP,Spain,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",32,44,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",32,44,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,EST,Estonia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",38,50,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,EST,Estonia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,FIN,Finland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,25,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,FIN,Finland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",10,25,,,, +2014,FIN,Finland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",10,25,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,FRA,France,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",24,39,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,FRA,France,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",22,37,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,FRA,France,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",22,37,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,GAB,Gabon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,GAB,Gabon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",12,27,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",12,26,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",12,26,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,GEO,Georgia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",107,93,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GEO,Georgia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",106,91,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",107,91,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,GHA,Ghana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GHA,Ghana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,GHA,Ghana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,GIN,Guinea,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,GIN,Guinea,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,GRC,Greece,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",52,59,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GRC,Greece,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,,,, +2014,GRC,Greece,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",87,80,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,,,, +2014,GTM,Guatemala,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",83,79,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,GUY,Guyana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,GUY,Guyana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",32,45,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",30,43,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",30,43,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,HND,Honduras,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",74,73,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,HND,Honduras,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",75,73,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",75,73,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,HRV,Croatia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,54,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,HRV,Croatia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,HTI,Haiti,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,HTI,Haiti,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,HUN,Hungary,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",27,41,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,HUN,Hungary,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",28,41,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",28,41,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",99,87,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",97,86,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",98,86,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,IND,India,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,64,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,IND,India,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,63,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,IND,India,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,63,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,IRL,Ireland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",19,35,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,IRL,Ireland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",19,34,,,, +2014,IRL,Ireland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",19,34,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,ISL,Iceland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",35,49,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ISL,Iceland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,,,, +2014,ISL,Iceland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ISR,Israel,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",17,31,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ISR,Israel,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",17,31,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",17,31,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ITA,Italy,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",35,49,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ITA,Italy,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",34,48,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,JOR,Jordan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",49,57,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,JOR,Jordan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",50,58,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",50,58,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,JPN,Japan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",1,20,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,JPN,Japan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",3,21,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",3,21,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",78,76,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",77,76,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",78,76,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,KEN,Kenya,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,KEN,Kenya,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",80,78,,,, +2014,KEN,Kenya,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",81,78,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,KHM,Cambodia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,KHM,Cambodia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,60,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",52,59,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",52,59,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,LBN,Lebanon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",71,72,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",71,71,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",71,71,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,LBR,Liberia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,LBR,Liberia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,LBY,Libya,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,LBY,Libya,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,90,,,, +2014,LBY,Libya,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",104,90,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",97,86,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",94,84,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",95,84,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,LTU,Lithuania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,54,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",44,54,,,, +2014,LTU,Lithuania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",44,54,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",1,20,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",2,20,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",2,20,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,LVA,Latvia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",46,56,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,LVA,Latvia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",44,54,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",44,54,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MAR,Morocco,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",60,65,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MAR,Morocco,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",62,66,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",62,66,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MDA,Moldova,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,90,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MDA,Moldova,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,90,,,, +2014,MDA,Moldova,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",104,90,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MEX,Mexico,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",50,58,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MEX,Mexico,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",48,57,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",48,57,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",63,66,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",62,66,,,, +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",62,66,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MLI,Mali,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MLI,Mali,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MLT,Malta,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",30,43,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MLT,Malta,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",30,43,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",30,43,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MNE,Montenegro,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,,,, +2014,MNE,Montenegro,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",83,79,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,MNG,Mongolia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MRT,Mauritania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,MRT,Mauritania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MUS,Mauritius,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",46,56,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",48,57,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",48,57,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,MWI,Malawi,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MWI,Malawi,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,MWI,Malawi,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,MYS,Malaysia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",46,56,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",47,55,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",47,55,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,NAM,Namibia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NAM,Namibia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,NGA,Nigeria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",90,82,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",90,82,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",91,82,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",82,79,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",83,79,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,28,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,27,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,27,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,NOR,Norway,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",16,29,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NOR,Norway,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,27,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",14,27,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,NPL,Nepal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NPL,Nepal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,NZL,New Zealand,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",4,22,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",4,22,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",4,22,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,OMN,Oman,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",55,62,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,OMN,Oman,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",53,61,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",96,84,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",97,86,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",98,86,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PAN,Panama,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",71,72,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PAN,Panama,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",72,72,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",72,72,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PER,Peru,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",67,68,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PER,Peru,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",65,67,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",65,67,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PHL,Philippines,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",68,69,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PHL,Philippines,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",70,70,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",70,70,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,POL,Poland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,54,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,POL,Poland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",40,53,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",28,42,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",29,42,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",29,42,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PRT,Portugal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PRT,Portugal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,,,, +2014,PRT,Portugal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",93,83,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",92,83,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",93,83,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,QAT,Qatar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",35,49,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,QAT,Qatar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",38,50,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",38,50,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ROU,Romania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,64,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ROU,Romania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,63,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,63,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",60,65,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,63,,,, +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",58,63,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,RWA,Rwanda,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",39,52,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",39,51,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",39,51,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SEN,Senegal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",80,78,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SEN,Senegal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",80,78,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",81,78,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SGP,Singapore,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",18,34,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SGP,Singapore,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",18,33,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",18,33,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,SLV,El Salvador,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",87,80,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",86,80,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",87,80,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SRB,Serbia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",76,74,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SRB,Serbia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",72,72,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",72,72,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SUR,Suriname,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SUR,Suriname,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,SUR,Suriname,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",28,42,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,,,, +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",25,40,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",33,47,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",33,46,,,, +2014,SVN,Slovenia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",33,46,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SWE,Sweden,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,25,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SWE,Sweden,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,24,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",7,24,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,SYC,Seychelles,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,,n/a,11/03/2010 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,SYR,Syria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,SYR,Syria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,SYR,Syria,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,TCD,Chad,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TCD,Chad,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,THA,Thailand,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",74,73,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,THA,Thailand,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",72,72,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",72,72,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,,,, +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,TUN,Tunisia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",71,72,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",76,74,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,TUR,Turkey,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",55,62,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TUR,Turkey,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",57,62,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",57,62,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",23,37,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",22,37,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",22,37,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,UGA,Uganda,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,UGA,Uganda,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",,,n/a,n/a,n/a, +2012,UKR,Ukraine,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",97,86,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",94,84,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",95,84,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,URY,Uruguay,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",68,69,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,URY,Uruguay,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",67,68,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",67,68,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,USA,United States,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",1,20,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,USA,United States,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",1,19,,,, +2014,USA,United States,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",1,19,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",100,88,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",100,88,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",101,88,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",93,83,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",88,81,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",89,81,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,YEM,Yemen,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,90,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,YEM,Yemen,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",102,89,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",103,89,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",19,35,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",20,35,2011,,Business Software Alliance;Shadow Market: 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study (Ninth edition);http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/,15/05/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",20,35,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",90,82,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",90,82,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",91,82,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",106,91,2010,,"Business software alliance/International data corporation, Global software piracy study 2010",11/03/2010 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",107,92,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,SOFTWAREPIRACY,"1.07 Software piracy rate, % software installed",108,92,2011, ,"Business software alliance/International data corporation/IPSOS, Global software piracy study 2011. http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-InBrief.pdf",15/05/2012 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),130,2.3543302953,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),137,2.382353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),94,3.0376220659,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),103,3.0231755844,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),114,2.8846443,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),27,5.0345000505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),23,5.2384104643,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),20,5.349519,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),128,2.4545421579,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),134,2.3815089459,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),139,2.3346124145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),96,3.0122315963,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),80,3.4306322025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),75,3.6013182205,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),19,5.3204923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),19,5.3370733143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),21,5.325008736,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),16,5.4733906667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),16,5.4839117589,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),17,5.4836899471,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),60,3.7065055313,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),53,3.9194617927,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),69,3.7112035083,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),139,1.9046036348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),141,1.918534645,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),142,2.303334897,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),26,5.0582935389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),24,5.2208748848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),22,5.2433725195,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),95,3.0134809857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),91,3.2191631462,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),101,3.1488679623,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),87,3.1673132506,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),71,3.5859481951,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),88,3.405160052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),129,2.3892694791,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),131,2.4303028903,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),130,2.6078746624,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),100,2.896127778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),105,2.988210322,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),104,3.0430946239,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),20,5.3057182105,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),28,5.1012272759,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),32,4.7630418821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),121,2.550591,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),130,2.50580065,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),135,2.469154,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),81,3.267975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),118,2.5991355507,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),88,3.2381182993,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),98,3.1742603726,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),84,3.2221278363,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),75,3.4954477683,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),80,3.5398639585,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),24,5.1372942224,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),30,4.8936476606,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),37,4.5123547854,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),50,3.8837295584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),47,4.0260856296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),39,4.4047603897,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),44,4.112808,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),49,3.9964983798,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),45,4.0983847887,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),47,4.0609685593,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),18,5.4421524213,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),17,5.4414051542,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),13,5.5684072042,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),3,6.0816276971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),4,6.0437469586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),5,5.9788515733,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),63,3.6274710792,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),61,3.7065393098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),60,3.8355863625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),47,4.0135356678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),51,3.9409382405,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),53,3.9439545952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),131,2.3473054262,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),122,2.6431342589,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),123,2.7175661214,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),97,3.0082044487,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),100,3.0785286724,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),100,3.1567951343,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),86,3.1848826033,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),89,3.2287441314,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),95,3.2261303061,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),114,2.6462171841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),113,2.8687734445,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),105,3.0235474638,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),70,3.4995124723,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),68,3.6194273212,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),59,3.8469110853,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),38,4.4006089773,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),44,4.2311212826,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),40,4.3813506099,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),58,3.7239676909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),56,3.822170012,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),61,3.8196237103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),13,5.5506892761,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),10,5.5857380694,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),14,5.5551162377,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),6,5.8518741794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),21,5.2830966286,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),26,5.0110697336,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),124,2.5074081402,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),119,2.7358257034,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),107,2.9550728286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),135,2.2158053826,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),142,1.8151550042,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),145,2.1752770429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),106,2.7452822235,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),115,2.839347,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),79,3.5520096675,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),80,3.3025341142,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),83,3.3266042773,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),94,3.2293520496,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),43,4.1141020964,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),50,3.9861020918,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),50,3.97584706,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),32,4.7984928333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),34,4.7489056152,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),31,4.806707878,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),66,3.570712225,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),65,3.6626726,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),85,3.4867091899,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),1,6.2497855765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),1,6.2785489522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),1,6.2410699421,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),7,5.8443686852,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),9,5.6330868739,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),12,5.6790871124,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),99,3.094336,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),131,2.6076119477,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),11,5.6827524615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),6,5.8835625615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),8,5.8481179091,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),105,2.76315725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),126,2.590542,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),124,2.7141689018,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),88,3.146397213,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),93,3.1484326663,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),56,3.8851235208,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),137,2.206191,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),143,2.2217253379,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),33,4.6706647282,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),36,4.664646118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),43,4.1905030362,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),52,3.8306886244,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),64,3.6701818065,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),70,3.7001157098,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),123,2.5207267063,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),121,2.6455921379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),111,2.8942682491,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),83,3.2469799882,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),78,3.4318271584,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),84,3.5053315193,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),14,5.4978039613,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),11,5.5807374875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),10,5.742956107,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),77,3.3267900619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),90,3.2265607661,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),103,3.0558821035,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),69,3.51954765,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),76,3.480113575,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),81,3.5276528455,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),142,1.574762,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),144,1.6156814319,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),147,1.9858165533,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),45,4.0799495344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),48,4.0255858902,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),58,3.851181023,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),62,3.62872175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),60,3.729092754,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),55,3.9036276057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),68,3.5239632957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),63,3.6745739892,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),71,3.6785871488,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),10,5.7182422412,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),15,5.5006822928,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),19,5.4473437966,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),111,2.6789027804,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),112,2.8723493667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),122,2.7709679793,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),23,5.1555989241,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),26,5.1522939776,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),29,4.8258495103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),35,4.6083316703,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),33,4.7649661327,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),34,4.6499965189,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),59,3.7187412648,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),62,3.7030627307,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),67,3.7246966488,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),75,3.3696122559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),79,3.4311152797,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),83,3.5120068346,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),40,4.2459573254,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),39,4.4511424952,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),36,4.561666,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),22,5.2642861272,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),18,5.3837042486,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),11,5.7334508465,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),116,2.631874,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),92,3.18458616,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),73,3.6212604024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),99,2.9249848098,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),96,3.1244514074,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),86,3.4472399811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),138,1.9848660107,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),140,1.96449035,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),140,2.3316740425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),91,3.1224663737,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),85,3.3060966859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),99,3.1700929118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),46,4.0718456278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),40,4.3310837333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),48,4.0252839654,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),51,3.8516234868,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),46,4.0463965966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),62,3.7910764568,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),64,3.774173,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),112,2.6750159505,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),124,2.6068870186,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),136,2.4059259818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),37,4.56674,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),68,3.7144813459,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),111,2.874848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),146,2.173384,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),44,4.0866936621,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),55,3.827973,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),63,3.7873065024,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),101,2.8414725545,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),104,3.0032983429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),92,3.2557799075,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),73,3.4852583651,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),66,3.661796403,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),66,3.7429814918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),5,5.932407588,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),7,5.8549953375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),6,5.94392125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),65,3.6003600917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),57,3.8129839752,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),51,3.9564517333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),71,3.494558,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),82,3.4071520925,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),90,3.2899902361,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),110,2.7135045155,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),117,2.8121105545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),125,2.7088831966,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),137,2.1052196609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),135,2.3691342393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),108,2.9094895719,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),85,3.2009381781,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),77,3.4778444766,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),77,3.5921854595,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),89,3.1419414639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),73,3.5063593373,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),54,3.9107756053,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),103,2.8020111049,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),109,2.9115083221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),127,2.7009822469,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),36,4.6008833,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),35,4.6927459818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),28,4.87656739,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),126,2.704238,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),57,3.7299478045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),70,3.6103161468,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),76,3.6002254805,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),136,2.2003772455,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),132,2.4226823219,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),134,2.4861041135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),125,2.4772330202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),128,2.5521929931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),129,2.6779062483,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),109,2.716465455,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),107,2.938517002,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),132,2.5267013824,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),55,3.8051757208,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),54,3.8357430409,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),49,4.0038736333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),53,3.8202793067,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),72,3.572363752,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),89,3.3997645155,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),31,4.948716403,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),31,4.8565606361,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),30,4.8144195892,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),37,4.5747892103,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),43,4.297105172,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),41,4.3153742571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),104,2.7780518855,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),110,2.8852960832,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),121,2.7897051371,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),119,2.572132733,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),98,3.0990216529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),82,3.5195195438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),9,5.770170279,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),5,5.9088084225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),9,5.7477019278,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),12,5.5840527462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),14,5.5226161607,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),15,5.5240900881,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),115,2.64561683,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),118,2.7827138462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),117,2.85445675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),8,5.8130353734,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),3,6.0729681377,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),3,6.0369254859,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),21,5.2881462051,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),25,5.1625298811,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),24,5.205007,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),93,3.0658510914,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),106,2.9668305167,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),109,2.9004250583,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),39,4.24686819,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),38,4.5536194682,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),35,4.633579573,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),122,2.5418498333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),127,2.5805088538,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),120,2.7999675728,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),102,2.8045911943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),87,3.24453924,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),78,3.5905698106,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),61,3.675455933,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),67,3.6329125178,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),72,3.6532823464,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),17,5.4505624088,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),13,5.5685828007,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),7,5.928455718,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),42,4.1608159163,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),42,4.3110415155,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),38,4.4975095186,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),133,2.2728948922,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),136,2.2407051655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),141,2.3081686725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),15,5.474945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),8,5.7504828167,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),4,5.983559621,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),98,2.9790512639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),114,2.8594464344,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),110,2.8987534876,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),126,2.4756059436,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),125,2.5965108444,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),113,2.8857566763,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),34,4.6406527575,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),32,4.845298,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),33,4.7086206579,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),25,5.107511,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),27,5.1040717385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),27,4.997848485,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),82,3.2670867555,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),95,3.1254717859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),96,3.2184659281,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),2,6.0961574635,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),2,6.0868652667,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),2,6.1210305616,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),102,3.054333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),87,3.4302404,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),113,2.6463253786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),133,2.4214184242,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),112,2.8942116615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),107,2.7418350248,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),116,2.82200885,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),115,2.8695630176,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),134,2.236617,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),129,2.537434369,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),118,2.8521664333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),54,3.8176368143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),58,3.8034296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),65,3.7444118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),41,4.203414,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),41,4.3269102294,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),42,4.1908393971,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),4,6.0298475174,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),12,5.5796980936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),16,5.5237169352,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),76,3.3315096632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),69,3.6166561121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),52,3.9546304687,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),52,3.937433,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),46,4.0657400857,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),72,3.4860908352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),132,2.3310809086,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),138,2.1250003326,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),144,2.1805937333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),92,3.0876947386,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),101,3.0576488923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),102,3.1322444081,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),74,3.3723447367,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),74,3.4984479328,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),120,2.5668447246,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),108,2.9252035333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),128,2.6907791043,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),67,3.538578481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),81,3.4245030906,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),91,3.2658163067,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),56,3.7861734587,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),97,3.1914582665,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),108,2.7237950614,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),86,3.2853603854,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),74,3.6120014089,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),29,5.020581809,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),22,5.2490720319,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),23,5.2109469617,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),79,3.3064252685,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),97,3.1093231225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),93,3.2390507675,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),78,3.3151267341,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),84,3.3077011413,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),119,2.8085238689,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),117,2.6121261,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),120,2.6968336761,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),133,2.4990590378,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),48,3.9966968559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),49,4.0160993534,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),45,4.0744521913,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),28,5.0290127327,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),29,4.970284389,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),25,5.1829779422,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),140,1.7933703711,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),143,1.6983785607,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),148,1.6394848839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),127,2.46047238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),123,2.63256075,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),116,2.863597161,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),141,1.695746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),139,2.018476781,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),138,2.370877752,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),30,4.9726811,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),20,5.3084570441,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),18,5.4578956978,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),64,3.6021114943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),59,3.7942899516,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),57,3.8772187788,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),90,3.1275091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),94,3.1478767333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ052,1.06 Intellectual property protection (1-7),106,3.0006485669,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),133,2.5240482813,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),144,2.21875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),65,3.6674625866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),93,3.2714574969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),113,2.9247629,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),43,4.1871009542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),25,4.5378090679,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),16,4.759365,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),136,2.3815945789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),142,2.1277868378,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),147,1.8882575131,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),84,3.2481673441,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),79,3.4974701834,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),76,3.3790299949,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),16,4.8122502692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),19,4.681969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),30,4.308699128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),15,4.8389809429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),22,4.6026694954,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),25,4.3680619676,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),59,3.7986192602,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),58,3.9002747916,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),53,3.7210007222,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),134,2.4747487652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),141,2.3738146586,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),135,2.4831432079,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),41,4.2033835917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),41,4.1578608689,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),36,4.0461524154,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),85,3.2453671036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),66,3.7107185692,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),91,3.2266471571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),106,2.9281945481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),81,3.4617381481,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),106,3.0235271388,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),81,3.3232992089,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),71,3.5856397226,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),81,3.3217536637,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),120,2.7739047631,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),114,2.9364924293,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),122,2.793230191,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),25,4.5727300029,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),28,4.496199669,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),43,3.883108884,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),109,2.890985,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),87,3.3334908,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),54,3.695541,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),98,3.048253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),107,2.9104065836,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),99,3.1874569066,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),88,3.2580305836,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),66,3.6591540357,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),61,3.8337371098,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),68,3.5091443763,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),24,4.5993391539,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),32,4.4664028376,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),32,4.2364987024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),52,3.8953974559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),49,3.9559270741,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),80,3.3220184564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),87,3.259397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),18,4.7362711541,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),15,4.8990171361,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),23,4.3843399653,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),11,5.072681916,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),12,5.056136598,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),15,4.7824279275,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),4,5.5090881871,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),2,5.6066082888,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),6,5.2903515367,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),23,4.6178937774,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),21,4.631737951,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),24,4.380692025,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),44,3.9975420232,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),53,3.9400784864,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),47,3.829050381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),129,2.6181972672,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),120,2.8393565839,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),95,3.1669972162,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),87,3.213579937,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),91,3.3033950966,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),103,3.0461055748,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),78,3.3663240428,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),89,3.3243083019,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),93,3.2011163082,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),69,3.5947175238,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),64,3.7469211199,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),64,3.525731017,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),47,3.9599607957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),47,3.9811427135,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),37,4.0048163686,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),20,4.6495103814,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),18,4.6933874742,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),26,4.3611694775,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),108,2.9022596909,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),118,2.8739826095,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),126,2.6909379446,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),12,5.0053862233,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),13,5.0205929613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),11,4.9092380747,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),9,5.2036698368,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),20,4.6337122919,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),38,3.9948505282,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),112,2.8756376351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),119,2.8544610621,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),107,3.0125170905,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),104,2.9571419217,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),137,2.4822053542,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),139,2.3144430102,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),137,2.3682350847,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),138,2.458989,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),100,3.0698684294,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),86,3.235107573,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),100,3.1745324969,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),94,3.1947754444,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),60,3.771133225,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),62,3.7875348031,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),69,3.49240266,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),35,4.306132975,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),39,4.1967040371,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),33,4.2285363757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),72,3.5769144917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),75,3.5468237125,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),116,2.8622106785,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),1,5.6972360206,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),1,5.8637242,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),1,5.8614990211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),17,4.7973155207,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),27,4.5097001773,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),31,4.2958098407,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),50,3.953239,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),86,3.2636834187,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),13,4.884917,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),11,5.0722140692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),8,5.1709680909,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),92,3.1341990484,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),106,3.062226,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),105,3.0300401,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),62,3.7636849249,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),78,3.5149059926,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),65,3.5243701658,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),122,2.798777,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),118,2.8553500552,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),31,4.3512492773,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),26,4.5176862236,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),45,3.8604586117,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),121,2.7647852256,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),132,2.5659150827,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),130,2.5968466115,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),110,2.8854528875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),98,3.193000446,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),73,3.4550450503,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),89,3.1892375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),95,3.2394793468,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),60,3.5846285901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),3,5.5123809419,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),7,5.3711602875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),2,5.5912726791,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),74,3.5263555569,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),77,3.5252782146,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),96,3.1463422043,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),126,2.67030825,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),129,2.6546221049,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),132,2.5169225134,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),141,2.052032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),143,2.1179443634,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),140,2.3006305495,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),119,2.7756359878,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),135,2.511205715,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),138,2.3741158424,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),61,3.76713625,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),63,3.7631654276,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),50,3.7461549829,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),51,3.8993351402,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),52,3.9402918703,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),48,3.7514876135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),29,4.4845537093,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),31,4.4778565613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),19,4.5644866256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),105,2.9542442529,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),104,3.1280357308,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),124,2.7336884885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),21,4.6485137445,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),29,4.491809119,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),21,4.488229406,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),49,3.9285737391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),57,3.9141964755,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),34,4.0980989405,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),125,2.6906746066,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),131,2.6243662391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),134,2.4869883512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),82,3.3180558737,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),90,3.3151342477,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),77,3.3511014596,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),67,3.6214471794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),44,4.0493423048,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),27,4.359118,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),32,4.3261844862,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),48,3.9751374653,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),35,4.0786704093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),91,3.148477,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),76,3.5420390889,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),61,3.5661945262,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),76,3.3978534683,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),69,3.6486036667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),56,3.6624582,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),131,2.5297473539,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),136,2.49715085,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),133,2.51333077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),48,3.9560359318,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),40,4.1612417435,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),72,3.4713690441,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),97,3.0615342389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),96,3.2372678667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),101,3.0492625106,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),50,3.9176269075,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),67,3.6894586172,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),49,3.7503915541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),114,2.90335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),132,2.5253480514,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),126,2.7347039535,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),141,2.2672181117,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),38,4.199604,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),57,3.6540053324,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),88,3.331075,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),115,2.8880984667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),37,4.2951494897,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),34,4.361796,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),39,3.9829788293,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),122,2.7478971577,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),111,2.962947728,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),75,3.3967033118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),63,3.7432728048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),45,4.0274971414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),90,3.2324950235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),5,5.3939626771,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),8,5.29868215,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),9,5.1568819,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),99,3.0446434516,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),92,3.2925940847,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),97,3.1355518103,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),53,3.889584,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),60,3.8470342806,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),74,3.4109472721,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),100,3.0330085183,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),112,2.9552798636,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),137,2.4752366137,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),115,2.8495158136,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),123,2.7593537315,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),121,2.7986172827,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),80,3.3471975406,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),85,3.3886689095,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),78,3.3352384418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),102,3.0017752979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),107,3.0572160951,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),112,2.925905093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),70,3.5898510467,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),82,3.4515986013,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),83,3.3120761592,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),55,3.8373280667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),68,3.6788043091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),55,3.68490137,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),143,2.227606,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),36,4.3001014803,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),54,3.9379302922,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),63,3.5388250182,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),114,2.8522339455,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),113,2.9516148201,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),129,2.6004635427,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),94,3.1037055251,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),109,3.0241994,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),117,2.8603751084,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),71,3.5874355405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),72,3.5692838007,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),119,2.8206987353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),33,4.3247447405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),30,4.4872738269,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),22,4.3951895625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),45,3.9780179533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),51,3.949926968,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),44,3.8778206095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),14,4.8740941604,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),10,5.0849818801,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),17,4.7146380811,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),27,4.5506498154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),42,4.1259379987,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),42,3.9266382584,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),58,3.8020879314,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),65,3.7179853841,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),92,3.2177261418,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),139,2.2179274915,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),125,2.7415987353,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),98,3.1179572356,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),7,5.3203443,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),3,5.5861743769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),5,5.3510719704,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),10,5.161162842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),9,5.2603727648,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),10,5.1126467049,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),96,3.06216829,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),86,3.3520216923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),104,3.038691,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),6,5.3302577617,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),4,5.5356169962,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),3,5.5562823326,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),26,4.5660132126,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),33,4.4628966676,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),18,4.652516,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),79,3.3550495546,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),97,3.1969913,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),108,3.002647475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),95,3.0985796679,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),80,3.4738412727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),58,3.6014128593,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),90,3.187799108,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),105,3.1180842152,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),109,3.0008387111,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),118,2.7819772686,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),102,3.1654755333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),71,3.481926652,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),83,3.2602672171,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),103,3.1637264059,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),111,2.9351831705,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),42,4.189877575,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),23,4.5933023821,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),14,4.7917727281,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),116,2.8325484251,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),101,3.1691065594,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),85,3.2665909814,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),124,2.6929032224,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),124,2.7424102115,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),99,3.0945611246,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),40,4.231554,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),14,4.9490289439,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),7,5.2447283489,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),113,2.8608284186,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),128,2.6607784573,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),128,2.6086038836,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),123,2.6971025687,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),127,2.6889041895,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),120,2.8057686297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),28,4.5110790041,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),17,4.779066,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),20,4.4928266876,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),22,4.641526,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),24,4.5651104923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),28,4.3579835949,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),88,3.1914443675,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),84,3.4157147152,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),59,3.5903961333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),8,5.266212946,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),6,5.4623668121,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),12,4.9009927085,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),110,2.987046,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),125,2.7179365,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),111,2.8831052643,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),117,2.9137153677,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),110,2.9783670487,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),127,2.6483899839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),133,2.5562694,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),136,2.4784377487,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),128,2.645556,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),115,2.9239771803,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),102,3.0464086414,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),138,2.3668924857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),140,2.3926178233,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),142,2.2449973451,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),101,3.030752,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),116,2.9220017815,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),131,2.5899295625,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),2,5.6608720623,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),5,5.474875022,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),4,5.363224691,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),77,3.3754047789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),108,3.0475925275,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),70,3.4872001108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),35,4.229958,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),41,3.9634819492,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),117,2.8276451959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),103,2.9934128477,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),121,2.8026239142,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),145,2.1728463449,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),54,3.8508912035,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),73,3.5602919538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),62,3.5484485658,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),46,3.970127405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),43,4.0527943177,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),93,3.1113382295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),83,3.4490232015,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),89,3.2568759058,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),75,3.5187632476,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),94,3.2680540524,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),84,3.2682049565,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),30,4.4265725552,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),67,3.5093328234,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),68,3.6101514566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),56,3.9205757561,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),46,3.8508282235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),34,4.3084475729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),36,4.2161732,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),52,3.7316753645,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),64,3.7011956202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),70,3.6200133822,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),82,3.3199271466,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),56,3.8224075319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),59,3.888849613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),66,3.5164247738,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),135,2.3969,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),139,2.4308819446,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),146,2.1551052774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),38,4.2685147453,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),46,4.0164392172,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),40,3.964331304,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),39,4.2318864901,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),37,4.2039239446,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),29,4.3223230503,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),142,1.5719330434,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),144,1.735955975,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),148,1.4666814839,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),73,3.57527856,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),74,3.5536284,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),79,3.333179439,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),140,2.188879,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),130,2.6475496286,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),127,2.663883784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),19,4.7184596,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),16,4.7975066794,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),13,4.8714845783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),57,3.8103531829,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),55,3.935868422,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),51,3.7359280447,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),130,2.5445942333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),134,2.5560168333,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ039,1.05 Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (1-7),123,2.7910926017,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),136,2.4836673703,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),129,2.735294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),63,3.7480954396,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),98,3.2895102781,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),120,2.95043765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),34,4.6030351402,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),22,4.8420540253,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),20,4.912072,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),124,2.7495744211,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),129,2.6837354054,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),133,2.629170924,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),81,3.4037669491,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),75,3.6332949675,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),74,3.6500024256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),14,5.1345581,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),18,4.9638657714,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),30,4.597568528,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),18,4.9759159905,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),25,4.7824584715,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),24,4.7741246691,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),95,3.2787306639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),76,3.6195184618,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),64,3.8389035333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),130,2.6905990609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),134,2.5552920941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),136,2.5542003149,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),51,4.0560388694,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),45,4.1794542583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),40,4.2316170893,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),77,3.4674643107,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),91,3.3296897385,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),104,3.2807512545,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),86,3.371823538,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),78,3.5951267012,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),103,3.2989888204,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),100,3.1197036304,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),101,3.2603359613,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),114,3.1113577592,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),126,2.7160457519,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),122,2.8364865122,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),125,2.8562777821,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),31,4.651759469,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),30,4.5979877379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),41,4.2247958962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),119,2.822512,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),105,3.1984777,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),85,3.506086,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),98,3.12559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),110,2.9292945761,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),104,3.2212940285,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),82,3.5536635753,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),75,3.4972600448,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),84,3.4731847817,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),101,3.301620183,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),20,4.9084759118,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),28,4.7009720688,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),34,4.4923426829,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),39,4.4388800802,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),34,4.487084963,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),19,4.9544015128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),51,4.015057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),23,4.8505540771,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),16,5.0315180371,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),25,4.7523122766,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),10,5.4283819511,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),9,5.428091595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),11,5.4075048703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),7,5.4909022569,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),4,5.6681354935,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),6,5.66936502,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),26,4.8098225132,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),23,4.8038757078,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),29,4.6713965375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),42,4.2553416492,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),44,4.223022414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),43,4.2003380714,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),120,2.8199197659,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),119,2.9359737321,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),90,3.4364584867,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),85,3.3861338571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),88,3.4110389379,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),102,3.300158572,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),88,3.3453882045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),97,3.2981679563,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),95,3.3667818143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),70,3.6471427746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),70,3.6893378869,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),72,3.6605483426,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),65,3.7165609447,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),73,3.6459889254,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),68,3.7398841647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),32,4.6333772356,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),32,4.5797603792,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),42,4.2053628754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),113,2.8868881299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),115,3.0491895418,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),115,3.0654223901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),19,4.9266635031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),20,4.9186879428,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),13,5.2418766542,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),8,5.479665725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),13,5.0876903168,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),21,4.8657546917,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),96,3.2180947186,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),95,3.3101110828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),99,3.3511218762,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),109,2.9733026348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),132,2.6347526333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),116,3.0534885847,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),135,2.5270215571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),130,2.671087,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),97,3.3569135254,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),60,3.8535194157,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),86,3.4357994912,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),106,3.2115452925,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),73,3.5490445768,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),69,3.7272542201,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),70,3.7085699,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),40,4.3173527,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),41,4.3085970129,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),39,4.2814562254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),62,3.7914644333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),62,3.8185556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),81,3.5640809975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),3,5.806270875,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),2,5.9833047565,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),2,6.0723374684,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),22,4.8533548084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),37,4.4394165571,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),48,4.084362301,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),60,3.824655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),86,3.4881531981,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),13,5.2572920769,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),11,5.3600067077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),8,5.5615091364,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),82,3.4016389766,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),89,3.370148,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),92,3.4209444627,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),43,4.2183573692,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),50,4.0396742847,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),50,4.0670842483,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),128,2.695553,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),139,2.4902235276,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),24,4.8287715403,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),21,4.8602459045,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),33,4.5148606184,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),121,2.8101392523,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),135,2.5481087518,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),138,2.5188976632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),116,2.8698597125,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),110,3.0937249143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),100,3.3358974817,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),93,3.3098311529,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),87,3.4348190659,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),73,3.6539744519,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),5,5.7241356968,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),6,5.5857438875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),3,5.8181504256,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),89,3.3427794276,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),102,3.2433425561,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),109,3.1693153645,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),129,2.69636515,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),137,2.4736086902,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),140,2.4846957214,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),140,2.138762,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),143,2.0978215333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),146,2.2321971636,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),91,3.3232410084,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),117,3.0370627817,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),113,3.1183691586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),69,3.6677778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),66,3.7816305057,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),49,4.0770734514,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),64,3.733778547,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),59,3.8484948865,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),62,3.8448692058,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),37,4.4831860557,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),29,4.6161741063,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),22,4.8480063932,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),72,3.5563580077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),77,3.6168263292,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),91,3.4211455867,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),21,4.9062105474,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),27,4.717435269,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),27,4.7156317185,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),41,4.3024857645,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),46,4.1443181418,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),44,4.2001096919,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),133,2.5893909319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),139,2.4725548804,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),145,2.3301960267,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),78,3.4495655551,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),79,3.5873820813,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),94,3.3923955353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),49,4.0660029302,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),43,4.2350222286,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),38,4.347388,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),28,4.7772062929,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),36,4.4649387417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),28,4.7094174239,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),87,3.363936,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),67,3.7685047956,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),53,3.9328224786,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),74,3.5213414415,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),72,3.6673945259,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),57,3.8894911736,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),132,2.6119893719,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),136,2.5275741,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),132,2.6451432425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),58,3.9021263804,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),56,3.9687830158,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),83,3.5457765441,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),84,3.3899123722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),80,3.5768846667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),84,3.5283372078,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),48,4.1508454811,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),57,3.9519116931,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),66,3.7791393595,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),35,4.477809,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),105,3.0050700355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),114,3.0641449442,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),130,2.7167864286,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),42,4.240624,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),67,3.7680701108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),103,3.237813,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),124,2.8915639333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),35,4.5247362483,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),33,4.535908,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),31,4.5611042805,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),94,3.2788979122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),99,3.2755578226,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),80,3.5827727667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),83,3.397045681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),90,3.3303094121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),96,3.3645029531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),12,5.2707016627,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),12,5.1579632625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),15,5.2049424265,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),104,3.0823495446,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),106,3.1979667036,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),117,2.9993445231,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),57,3.906102,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),54,3.9819800567,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),71,3.6868040918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),108,2.975728838,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),120,2.9231034455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),131,2.6487388462,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),127,2.7114721036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),125,2.7495238393,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),121,2.936549808,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),101,3.1196517295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),100,3.2640617373,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),98,3.3511338284,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),99,3.1243979722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),108,3.1782229603,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),87,3.4646374363,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),76,3.481098477,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),85,3.4569126065,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),111,3.1485000918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),46,4.1751349556,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),58,3.9287006545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),46,4.18737518,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),134,2.626703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),45,4.1920531503,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),51,4.0265463247,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),58,3.876967213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),106,2.9961292182,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),94,3.3101607645,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),110,3.1645924368,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),90,3.3255581071,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),93,3.3166066207,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),105,3.2514304876,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),80,3.4238051649,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),92,3.3167449745,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),127,2.7953254412,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),33,4.6306960637,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),26,4.7289927113,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),23,4.8470837292,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),50,4.06594302,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),52,4.016701648,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),56,3.8931791233,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),17,5.0291063563,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),14,5.0840549747,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),18,5.079654073,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),29,4.7697066667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),38,4.4018908873,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),32,4.5417652584,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),55,3.9394390913,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),48,4.1105376336,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),77,3.6017115765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),134,2.5271657477,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),112,3.0722906941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),89,3.4383019356,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),9,5.4669893032,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),8,5.5504088095,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),9,5.5558116663,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),6,5.6406344034,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),7,5.5511632828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),7,5.5854258748,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),117,2.859098495,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),113,3.0652018462,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),123,2.898916,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),4,5.7834985862,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),3,5.871358384,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),4,5.7627097685,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),15,5.0372867854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),19,4.9560841338,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),14,5.239655,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),102,3.1078297799,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),109,3.1103530333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),112,3.1483559792,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),61,3.8346339317,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),47,4.1419906869,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),61,3.8636253171,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),107,2.9804878816,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),118,3.0352869415,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),107,3.1926695617,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),115,2.8701943314,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),107,3.1928055333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),76,3.6058669463,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),97,3.1662829242,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),111,3.0753364332,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),119,2.9517382754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),38,4.4816641892,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),24,4.7856742366,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),16,5.1643049258,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),131,2.6603227351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),121,2.8522140048,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),122,2.9079299349,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),125,2.7439903562,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),127,2.7161848713,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),141,2.4727242783,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),11,5.347589,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),10,5.3706454848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),10,5.4328858703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),122,2.7845740763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),133,2.6027249469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),128,2.7846581035,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),123,2.7644213391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),124,2.7535975271,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),118,2.9892615729,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),25,4.8153057863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),15,5.051941,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),17,5.1370931587,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),30,4.764121,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),31,4.5920225385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),36,4.4742814812,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),92,3.3194925592,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),71,3.6839800978,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),52,3.9439545219,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),1,6.3277083664,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),1,6.2374526485,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),1,6.1460273774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),64,3.805766,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),69,3.73367365,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),114,2.8844675643,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),123,2.8029677629,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),126,2.7973422846,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),137,2.4546288832,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),138,2.47324435,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),137,2.5479304347,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),128,2.697622,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),116,3.0447519944,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),108,3.1837878678,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),139,2.1898837429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),140,2.3584461767,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),143,2.4081034527,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),111,2.924945,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),126,2.7488248938,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),135,2.5576958029,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),2,5.9513226043,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),5,5.6468684899,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),5,5.7444246213,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),68,3.6795362684,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),81,3.5084607363,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),63,3.8435756024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),55,3.974623,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),47,4.094163,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),103,3.0841664796,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),118,2.8268021695,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),131,2.6689850867,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),142,2.4098975174,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),53,3.9771235991,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),65,3.8013726885,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),60,3.8656178,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),56,3.9327007447,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),53,4.0098323692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),112,2.9137033082,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),96,3.3060975227,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),88,3.4525757,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),71,3.5666840619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),83,3.4843077221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),79,3.5933006184,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),27,4.7867885393,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),54,3.9016646455,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),66,3.7018293145,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),61,3.8240805616,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),59,3.869150705,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),44,4.1946624842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),40,4.3209187507,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),45,4.1980590794,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),59,3.8831586933,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),68,3.7275294921,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),75,3.6422327597,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),54,3.9647585824,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),49,4.0941939337,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),65,3.8053416262,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),138,2.32370405,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),141,2.3576779615,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),144,2.3499441429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),52,4.0462624826,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),63,3.809905189,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),55,3.9008713717,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),36,4.5202255574,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),35,4.4790101133,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),26,4.7305698894,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),142,1.9209159253,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),144,1.9115642679,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),148,1.8110082161,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),67,3.69564334,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),74,3.6339502,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),93,3.4001478927,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),141,1.996725,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),142,2.1311054762,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),147,2.195345516,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),16,5.0346847,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),17,5.0205286088,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),12,5.3172338674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),47,4.1626168114,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),39,4.3637413165,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),37,4.4240760659,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),79,3.4392120333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),82,3.494496,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ040,1.04 Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (1-7),78,3.5948130628,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),129,2.4179383,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),127,2.441176,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),101,2.9744786122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),121,2.5817590031,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),134,2.33217275,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),34,5.0777772364,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),23,5.3884791574,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),23,5.469088,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),124,2.5796415789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),133,2.2740424054,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),132,2.3763348982,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),108,2.8034896509,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),110,2.800492411,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),110,2.9506772667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),13,6.1185693462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),14,6.0038051429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),16,5.740950592,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),22,5.5413222413,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),30,5.191630396,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),30,5.1027033897,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),83,3.4296590663,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),86,3.4046939309,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),93,3.2822827389,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),141,1.6860088609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),143,1.6506666225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),147,1.6672992198,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),29,5.2685463528,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),28,5.2343682808,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),24,5.4264777905,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),95,3.0827122,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),101,2.9001861077,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),116,2.7378391906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),125,2.5508589076,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),126,2.4626780469,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),142,2.0964494337,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),90,3.2213794886,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),104,2.8444685903,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),129,2.4351361299,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),104,2.9364059614,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),102,2.8829652049,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),123,2.6009163104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),26,5.3051357971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),32,5.0714528552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),46,4.5145404434,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),97,3.066617,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),78,3.51044225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),64,3.873572,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),98,3.056608,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),100,3.0197959716,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),97,3.1437922874,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),102,3.1043295041,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),71,3.7365858227,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),71,3.7506258363,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),65,3.8672258033,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),17,5.9170690618,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),19,5.7329650431,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),21,5.5069033024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),42,4.7657584361,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),33,5.0645090926,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),34,5.039534959,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),38,4.802536,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),25,5.3645142642,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),22,5.5147903546,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),26,5.3049833569,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),8,6.3299945606,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),5,6.3038605881,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),10,6.1501023746,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),5,6.404794533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),6,6.2765615432,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),11,6.0822323767,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),24,5.4673900302,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),24,5.3183103176,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),27,5.28876435,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),63,3.9333251287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),66,3.8747426634,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),57,4.0075876429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),137,1.7954947127,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),137,2.1033019786,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),128,2.4387008717,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),113,2.7189598104,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),127,2.4609523793,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),136,2.2807443552,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),81,3.5037926744,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),96,3.1660264248,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),106,3.0436613918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),57,4.1617967153,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),51,4.1826852047,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),53,4.1214858255,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),38,4.8753637234,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),40,4.6659242881,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),37,4.8186705716,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),27,5.2889019979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),39,4.7706050871,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),47,4.4744918303,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),74,3.7046993351,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),75,3.6768385418,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),68,3.7892300662,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),7,6.3342701252,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),7,6.2415748252,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),13,6.0283285946,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),2,6.5530185559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),13,6.0158974683,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),8,6.1570601754,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),115,2.6924653278,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),120,2.5846568759,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),131,2.3793137381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),126,2.5216585565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),123,2.5209718625,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),95,3.2141131265,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),130,2.3041409959,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),128,2.45071,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),100,3.1589180484,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),41,4.7661238172,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),53,4.1436351191,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),82,3.4557561128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),65,3.9163944982,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),60,4.0064040768,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),72,3.67825786,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),23,5.508270275,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),21,5.5402853792,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),20,5.5154075667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),93,3.1166229688,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),109,2.823368225,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),112,2.8566782557,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),4,6.4127300897,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),2,6.4942668304,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),2,6.5939624474,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),37,4.8993755333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),37,4.9062472857,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),31,5.0575342598,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),117,2.648808,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),120,2.647693443,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),11,6.1985963077,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),11,6.1941940385,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),6,6.2339251591,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),91,3.1807640798,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),95,3.175311,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),91,3.312728597,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),59,4.0713775657,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),58,4.0506968748,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),50,4.4055772007,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),119,2.620114,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),137,2.2388189276,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),46,4.4500564099,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),49,4.3220007365,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),61,3.9687524969,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),85,3.3330701324,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),98,3.0557023738,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),84,3.4136115362,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),117,2.6471542688,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),103,2.8581009118,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),107,3.026888726,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),87,3.2647784353,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),93,3.1891611052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),79,3.4965947381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),15,6.0806159161,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),12,6.043314525,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),4,6.2854378558,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),77,3.5981816343,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),69,3.7633698386,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),108,2.9688681674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),99,3.05420005,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),106,2.8303326245,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),109,2.968559108,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),140,1.737085,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),142,1.8183454085,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),143,2.0354572147,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),64,3.9206915458,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),72,3.6969164889,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),66,3.8582673937,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),76,3.59936965,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),76,3.5689540897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),74,3.6574901543,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),51,4.3439212547,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),45,4.5209729405,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),40,4.7436933671,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),10,6.2661056907,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),4,6.3299920757,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),3,6.3515474171,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),66,3.8166799061,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),63,3.9617137858,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),73,3.6705135484,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),19,5.8279152672,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),18,5.7439422241,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),19,5.5588843766,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),12,6.1808122036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),15,5.8558248255,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),15,5.7656644595,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),60,3.9924028571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),68,3.7700606715,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),70,3.7148075529,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),48,4.4344770415,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),46,4.408019132,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),49,4.4311746912,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),49,4.3540528698,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),48,4.3875476762,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),48,4.433684,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),18,5.8287375138,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),17,5.8254607667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),14,5.961774742,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),111,2.737292,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),94,3.1828618489,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),88,3.3869923262,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),103,2.9421160634,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),85,3.405077863,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),60,3.9705263245,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),135,1.9092646202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),140,1.93587725,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),140,2.1904905825,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),96,3.0766511961,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),91,3.2548939424,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),115,2.7672221324,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),69,3.7556495,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),74,3.6833972667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),78,3.5418673553,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),32,5.1288082198,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),36,4.911723446,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),36,4.9549906135,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),56,4.056045,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),127,2.4874574056,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),131,2.388846414,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),135,2.3134696805,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),52,4.173107,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),83,3.4272727541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),84,3.429807,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),97,3.2005264667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),54,4.3048641655,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),56,4.104696,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),62,3.9341575659,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),107,2.8781216829,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),100,2.9667659524,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),80,3.4898262027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),84,3.3938021619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),82,3.4841360042,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),71,3.7094312071,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),14,6.0910074024,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),16,5.8447289313,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),18,5.6626800735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),67,3.8097051446,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),61,3.9828614438,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),63,3.9113603231,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),80,3.570963,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),81,3.5016449463,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),87,3.3906919902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),132,2.1931926746,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),138,2.0782972818,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),145,1.9229715162,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),131,2.2577753243,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),135,2.209705064,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),141,2.140373151,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),89,3.2425991286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),88,3.3644231335,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),90,3.3480613622,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),105,2.8870403479,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),105,2.842157076,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),98,3.1743911468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),112,2.7325947758,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),111,2.7927088143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),122,2.6293969765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),31,5.1346291333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),35,5.0174968909,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),39,4.78220544,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),113,2.838139,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),56,4.1654150172,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),65,3.9176963208,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),75,3.6420396494,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),122,2.6004316727,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),112,2.7503743811,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),111,2.8650853058,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),114,2.6955243295,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),130,2.440226331,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),125,2.5561016438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),120,2.6115907756,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),108,2.8248329549,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),130,2.4152353235,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),40,4.8572371946,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),34,5.058859657,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),35,5.0008736833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),52,4.3433566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),54,4.14288392,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),59,3.9762803224,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),43,4.6778510619,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),43,4.6243941355,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),44,4.5477408459,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),39,4.8668401179,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),44,4.5541127732,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),41,4.7098689851,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),73,3.7104168551,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),73,3.6861537935,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),96,3.2095634901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),136,1.8027293188,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),134,2.2183719824,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),121,2.6374404027,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),6,6.3464437774,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),3,6.4389082562,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),7,6.1776896237,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),9,6.281106842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),8,6.2406301025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),5,6.2545216776,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),92,3.17794866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),89,3.2782747692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),92,3.2997727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),1,6.7319216894,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),1,6.6907218443,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),1,6.6782794837,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),33,5.0989272953,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),31,5.1244869743,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),29,5.282073,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),62,3.933532569,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),57,4.0989898708,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),55,4.0615170333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),133,2.1088303639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),132,2.2908838449,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),118,2.6966468692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),119,2.6175608517,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),125,2.4834233064,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),126,2.5384613074,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),102,2.9487415429,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),99,3.0157230533,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),99,3.1660770573,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),53,4.332661287,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),50,4.2474795025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),54,4.0904133483,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),45,4.4915347642,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),41,4.6407365067,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),42,4.6599965977,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),61,3.9339707778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),67,3.8690738637,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),51,4.1777851674,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),138,1.7777737064,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),141,1.8591858253,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),146,1.713446942,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),16,6.024066,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),10,6.1962172197,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),12,6.0804058694,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),94,3.1094389175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),114,2.6894511677,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),114,2.8331265831,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),123,2.5970826645,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),122,2.5562320051,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),119,2.6770785593,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),30,5.2140275342,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),25,5.312704,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),33,5.0411728397,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),21,5.578257,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),26,5.3027246923,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),28,5.2854507906,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),110,2.7545364398,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),118,2.6209979826,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),103,3.0655221354,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),20,5.6403716898,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),20,5.6928858,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),17,5.6769180299,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),107,2.825792,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),104,3.0566325,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),106,2.8814839,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),116,2.6657211758,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),105,3.0476846128,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),128,2.4300740621,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),129,2.442485625,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),124,2.5594560744,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),50,4.352994,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),55,4.1349157859,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),58,4.0068299632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),116,2.6608843286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),115,2.6697030233,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),133,2.3360542703,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),68,3.779263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),70,3.7617428261,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),76,3.5676322279,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),3,6.4711750029,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),9,6.2088960257,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),9,6.1527004639,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),79,3.5903622842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),90,3.2735446,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),81,3.465101541,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),62,3.963006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),52,4.128814546,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),109,2.7560688719,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),121,2.6033042716,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),136,2.1737258633,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),144,2.0244326667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),55,4.2034502789,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),59,4.0120372308,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),67,3.7989167186,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),72,3.7173032231,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),64,3.9417770692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),86,3.3250561639,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),92,3.2294612576,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),86,3.3945650507,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),47,4.4374679143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),47,4.4076441004,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),43,4.5742591339,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),58,4.0732102378,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),77,3.5509275521,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),88,3.2638398566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),83,3.4562769427,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),85,3.4057133654,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),44,4.656194006,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),42,4.6381242522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),45,4.5420163035,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),75,3.6139877348,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),77,3.5398703131,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),94,3.2342774602,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),70,3.7389809626,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),80,3.5069234587,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),101,3.1244383475,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),134,2.08058985,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),124,2.5130444085,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),139,2.2186526143,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),28,5.2759052323,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),29,5.2231120405,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),25,5.4157840908,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),36,4.9431164778,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),38,4.9000730789,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),32,5.0420012437,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),142,1.6490233566,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),144,1.2724211286,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),148,1.1132363935,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),78,3.59542266,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),87,3.36575875,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),89,3.3612526049,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),139,1.770974,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),139,1.9718423619,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),138,2.23365478,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),35,4.97319705,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),27,5.2868214882,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),22,5.4813227913,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),82,3.4690671686,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),79,3.5090886352,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),69,3.7467026704,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),118,2.6397941,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),113,2.7321542667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ144,1.03 Judicial independence (1-7),117,2.7159593504,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),135,2.5091061797,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),143,2.272727,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),76,3.7894838707,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),81,3.7457157375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),85,3.71488095,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),27,5.087341714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),9,5.5142808036,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),4,5.664331,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),106,3.2357621053,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),117,3.1537713243,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),127,2.8848476891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),88,3.6161042969,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),50,4.3251324497,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),42,4.6043318872,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),14,5.3642054154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),17,5.2631591429,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),17,5.124682224,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),10,5.4561182857,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),21,5.184791755,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),21,5.0761042118,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),64,4.0201365892,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),46,4.4113701539,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),24,5.0519747944,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),141,1.9573591652,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),144,2.0213015284,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),141,2.308940505,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),35,4.7996350417,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),33,4.8609567192,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),30,4.9075796692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),120,2.9437167786,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),120,3.0725204385,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),135,2.6299529016,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),103,3.3631687481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),111,3.2150355728,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),124,3.0389285071,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),117,3.0120608228,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),118,3.1091136129,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),123,3.0434694255,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),60,4.0564441216,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),70,3.982210461,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),66,4.0413124746,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),33,4.8504504199,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),32,4.8969930897,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),40,4.6904109726,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),115,3.089751,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),95,3.59684,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),67,4.011731,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),124,2.725484,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),119,2.9599358007,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),110,3.2200177517,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),118,3.1442581562,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),46,4.4493330402,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),47,4.3969804488,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),60,4.1740294461,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),53,4.1701924776,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),56,4.2070694147,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),64,4.1068825756,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),70,3.9250130653,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),61,4.1040316852,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),49,4.3251359436,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),96,3.487267,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),80,3.7425962367,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),90,3.6744509433,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),101,3.3985734683,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),21,5.2701272202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),22,5.1844436368,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),19,5.1012322208,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),7,5.5881317268,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),13,5.4109420296,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),22,5.07308407,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),32,4.9624125925,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),31,4.9385347373,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),36,4.8006099125,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),47,4.4402270669,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),51,4.3189717053,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),52,4.3169240714,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),136,2.476706559,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),126,2.8605183911,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),108,3.2850057561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),122,2.8405468701,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),119,3.0796062655,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),128,2.8591943063,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),50,4.3474404952,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),57,4.2017912993,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),55,4.2375871531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),72,3.9078534868,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),74,3.9318955079,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),82,3.7751493,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),68,3.9287564979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),65,4.0657884534,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),51,4.3170015451,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),41,4.5832533062,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),44,4.4177960831,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),61,4.137877593,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),44,4.4758450052,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),41,4.5960580506,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),47,4.4469076559,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),31,4.9645315632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),27,5.0028910023,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),26,4.997977531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),4,5.7561947897,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),12,5.4201899708,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),18,5.1216190306,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),67,3.9471890763,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),68,4.0033432069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),73,3.9538775381,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),130,2.634408513,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),140,2.2955830875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),146,2.0722756765,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),90,3.5968198459,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),78,3.783982,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),65,4.0419989833,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),83,3.7190285995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),87,3.7087157464,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),104,3.3730115632,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),39,4.6433362643,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),39,4.7035993139,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),38,4.77875134,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),3,5.8366812,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),3,5.7734244551,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),3,5.7549136198,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),116,3.0615447729,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),121,3.0541083,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),130,2.824642362,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),6,5.6833193074,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),4,5.7408457391,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),5,5.6350594211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),22,5.2216146363,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),24,5.0583351962,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),29,4.9219905531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),134,2.628697,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),136,2.5695851794,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),12,5.4403018462,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),5,5.5727868538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),8,5.5042233409,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),78,3.7430752202,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),79,3.764255,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),79,3.8053748834,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),104,3.3129038154,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),96,3.5826769595,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),77,3.8474528785,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),129,2.827375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),139,2.4665727586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),75,3.8545065149,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),49,4.3273818022,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),50,4.3222807031,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),85,3.6802736585,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),103,3.4398012798,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),106,3.3021745764,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),73,3.8814291375,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),75,3.9180143665,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),75,3.8888984385,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),114,3.1366894118,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),114,3.1880800705,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),91,3.6431495133,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),8,5.4915506323,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),11,5.4692692375,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),7,5.5250122093,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),97,3.4936118873,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),102,3.4467415386,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),119,3.1200093844,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),69,3.9252059,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),73,3.9363659936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),71,3.9636702647,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),139,2.103722,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),143,2.0638355568,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),142,2.2759383902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),49,4.3759231641,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),48,4.3646150993,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),57,4.1821978576,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),71,3.91539605,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),58,4.1973083471,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),46,4.4678591371,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),48,4.3947171345,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),52,4.3064158432,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),54,4.2401404155,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),34,4.8240425794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),28,4.9958603838,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),23,5.0536111333,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),105,3.2389534459,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),99,3.5394985056,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),97,3.4556729054,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),16,5.3193566847,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),26,5.0254878345,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),31,4.9046030179,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),25,5.0977977355,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),30,4.9799659816,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),32,4.8659964,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),61,4.0523014473,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),77,3.8578473609,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),89,3.6878598395,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),62,4.0431439085,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),82,3.7356203164,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),92,3.6323089721,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),74,3.8781334714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),53,4.2556919714,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),44,4.517812,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),36,4.725764923,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),42,4.5228579583,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),33,4.8156190425,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),66,3.999284,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),69,3.9964766578,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),53,4.2589546952,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),56,4.1572543024,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),60,4.1359761778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),62,4.1205936,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),133,2.5323120444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),135,2.5045169,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),137,2.54574812,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),93,3.5579067229,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),89,3.6774766904,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),98,3.4533377353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),18,5.31049755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),15,5.3608749333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),12,5.3393743006,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),110,3.1994719896,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),128,2.8511211322,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),131,2.7137065784,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),70,4.001528,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),138,2.2197379542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),142,2.0668024186,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),148,2.0166056494,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),72,3.950188,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),105,3.3499768297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),136,2.467815,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),144,2.1641494,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),57,4.132062469,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),67,4.029538,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),76,3.8734738976,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),134,2.5149654504,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),138,2.3781990387,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),133,2.6906799473,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),38,4.6455167,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),40,4.6250723215,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),41,4.6620497806,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),5,5.6875379807,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),1,6.0222388688,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),1,5.9143614882,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),59,4.0653503389,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),54,4.2432626628,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),56,4.2056376359,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),87,3.621048,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),85,3.7239055403,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),80,3.7926898557,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),101,3.4290899437,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),98,3.5491323182,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),93,3.6288585094,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),132,2.5347797391,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),132,2.728995727,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),126,2.8923695847,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),54,4.1633755594,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),55,4.2429838649,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),59,4.1771055247,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),63,4.0308920268,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),62,4.0950147627,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),48,4.4318259702,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),108,3.2283248344,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),125,2.9316010948,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),112,3.1980549571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),15,5.3483588444,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),16,5.3399246545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),20,5.09245211,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),147,2.026538,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),43,4.4835859338,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),45,4.4113981143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),58,4.181195987,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),118,3.0097415091,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),105,3.3554309089,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),94,3.5424080719,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),109,3.2079671995,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),124,2.9803189448,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),125,2.9028629612,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),125,2.7247009237,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),130,2.8249531876,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),132,2.6919180588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),51,4.3078452565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),43,4.4756672532,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),45,4.5033012542,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),91,3.57983726,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),108,3.228204024,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),110,3.2101699991,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),23,5.2074159604,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),23,5.1754021608,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),13,5.2520791973,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),92,3.5720421795,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),94,3.6266409529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),90,3.6566033975,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),81,3.7369106565,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),93,3.6606547028,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),109,3.2508422817,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),128,2.6798302386,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),115,3.1734316529,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),99,3.444724111,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),11,5.4437987306,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),10,5.4758433734,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),16,5.1277203456,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),9,5.4802472689,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),14,5.3786927639,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),9,5.463162958,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),127,2.694316135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),131,2.7428077692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),134,2.68640185,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),13,5.4241794691,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),6,5.5571419528,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),10,5.4423434543,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),30,4.9707524787,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),36,4.8245918311,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),35,4.801613,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),112,3.1680499747,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),113,3.1943110667,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),122,3.0831659042,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),37,4.6662361442,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),37,4.7600197318,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),39,4.7281440856,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),79,3.7430556678,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),84,3.7265192877,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),84,3.724217687,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),84,3.6830151943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),66,4.05208208,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),72,3.9595252273,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),86,3.6496253499,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),91,3.6695540436,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),83,3.7579981976,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),45,4.4689685297,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),38,4.7544313209,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),28,4.9733395953,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),19,5.2988269226,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),19,5.2054615928,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),25,5.0380695047,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),123,2.8358208484,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),123,3.0291729,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),117,3.148634571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),20,5.288373,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),7,5.539666703,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),6,5.5657794336,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),94,3.5544065608,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),88,3.699154025,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),63,4.1125250149,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),99,3.4856899466,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),106,3.3128546064,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),95,3.5103309958,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),40,4.6182998014,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),34,4.855105,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),37,4.7815864545,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),26,5.094802,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),25,5.0367106769,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),27,4.9752858073,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),65,4.0183535272,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),83,3.7319171587,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),100,3.4164639104,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),2,5.8521654606,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),2,5.8012198667,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),2,5.8113806817,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),107,3.237766,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),120,3.0979494,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),107,3.2296489143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),116,3.1577575871,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),102,3.3962123897,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),100,3.4381866658,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),100,3.485769525,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),103,3.3755282141,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),140,2.089993,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),139,2.317233062,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),138,2.5167073057,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),58,4.0674597357,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),63,4.088970763,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),81,3.7852964901,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),28,5.082296,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),35,4.8295371171,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),43,4.5660981962,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),1,5.9055928435,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),8,5.5276754771,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),11,5.4087217803,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),137,2.2681812421,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),133,2.6364205209,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),116,3.1689382735,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),64,4.085829,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),69,4.0037358571,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),129,2.6683561056,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),131,2.5517193218,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),137,2.3861195606,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),145,2.0844807159,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),82,3.7236815237,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),80,3.7536132154,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),88,3.7011049497,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),95,3.5358880573,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),86,3.7230035222,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),126,2.7052877475,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),127,2.8563346091,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),129,2.8537536551,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),113,3.1606366714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),112,3.1943171603,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),115,3.181991764,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),42,4.5145164866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),87,3.7082626024,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),52,4.2576065958,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),59,4.1842292488,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),68,4.0049217067,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),24,5.1385079759,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),18,5.2128718319,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),14,5.1818244936,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),102,3.4007504191,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),109,3.2267124377,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),113,3.1888955335,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),96,3.5104716571,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),97,3.5528424315,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),114,3.1842191836,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),98,3.4869743,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),101,3.4719998977,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),107,3.2959678263,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),55,4.1599390969,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),71,3.9776798896,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),78,3.8458352838,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),17,5.3183396395,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),20,5.1938456381,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),15,5.1645919774,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),111,3.1807702627,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),104,3.3820695893,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),111,3.2070791903,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),77,3.744957,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),92,3.66489665,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),86,3.7127805902,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),142,1.875233,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),141,2.1921599143,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),140,2.351140916,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),29,5.0474208,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),29,4.9801769206,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),34,4.813225438,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),89,3.6024297629,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),76,3.8671353802,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),74,3.8971822603,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),121,2.8982660333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),122,3.0409111667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ081,1.02 Laws relating to ICTs (1-7),121,3.0933832579,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),83,3.3106697141,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AGO,Angola,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AGO,Angola,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),97,3.235294,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ALB,Albania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),63,3.5529802317,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2011 +2013,ALB,Albania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),88,3.2869619344,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ALB,Albania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),105,3.10741055,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),26,4.5643998037,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),21,4.8095785329,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),20,4.80887,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),136,2.2188422632,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),141,2.025344,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARG,Argentina,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),146,2.0594344036,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),88,3.1912300497,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),79,3.3967770061,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ARM,Armenia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),78,3.4617878564,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUS,Australia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),9,5.2839702308,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUS,Australia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),18,4.8539749143,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUS,Australia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),25,4.542515232,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AUT,Austria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),34,4.3788233587,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AUT,Austria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),37,4.1603248384,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AUT,Austria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),35,4.3264599838,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),56,3.7009108096,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),59,3.7542955309,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),63,3.6899031472,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),129,2.3070740783,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),133,2.3242034302,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BDI,Burundi,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),136,2.3873139168,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),73,3.4159316889,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),63,3.6928046715,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEL,Belgium,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),49,3.9981202609,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BEN,Benin,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),72,3.417213175,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BEN,Benin,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),41,4.0824546385,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BEN,Benin,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),45,4.051359778,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),92,3.0536371582,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),86,3.2951735111,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),116,2.9033488561,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),94,3.045577643,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),101,3.0581265419,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),101,3.1558174395,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),109,2.8750002759,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),111,2.8798678756,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),117,2.8416582567,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),36,4.3157358544,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),47,3.9765070828,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),85,3.3583935009,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),121,2.50386,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),100,3.08281475,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),73,3.556505,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),89,3.182979,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BLZ,Belize,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),108,2.8766284866,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),91,3.2000587623,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),86,3.3331859781,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),113,2.7379094487,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),120,2.7009090128,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRA,Brazil,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),133,2.5869126813,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),6,5.4821483842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),10,5.107228278,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRB,Barbados,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),15,4.9851302537,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),25,4.5723771668,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),24,4.7156580185,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),26,4.5316419231,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),22,4.740903,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),22,4.8158857229,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),15,4.9700742134,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,BWA,Botswana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),17,4.897895176,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CAN,Canada,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),11,5.1715070819,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CAN,Canada,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),6,5.285605009,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CAN,Canada,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),10,5.205843886,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),18,4.8420868689,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),16,4.9185059408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),13,5.0127849267,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHL,Chile,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),38,4.2081129509,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHL,Chile,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),52,3.9328495922,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHL,Chile,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),62,3.716368825,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CHN,China,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),29,4.4215933178,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CHN,China,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),33,4.3025841182,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CHN,China,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),39,4.2215071667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),120,2.5084522642,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),114,2.8293361161,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),103,3.1411641896,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),86,3.2190707286,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),95,3.1096509552,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),113,2.9320153035,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,COL,Colombia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),106,2.8844693099,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,COL,Colombia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),117,2.7670296764,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,COL,Colombia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),124,2.7403792755,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),27,4.4522558519,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),34,4.2641026848,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),44,4.0691905277,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),126,2.380221217,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),139,2.198734556,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),140,2.1999958431,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),19,4.8372433052,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),27,4.5961053022,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),46,4.0287684669,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),107,2.8824711714,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),106,2.9808513934,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),110,2.9775132366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DEU,Germany,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),23,4.6257554933,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DEU,Germany,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),20,4.8192955811,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DEU,Germany,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),11,5.1121927815,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),7,5.3854189382,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),17,4.8663936689,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DNK,Denmark,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),23,4.7159475588,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),117,2.5606956876,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),124,2.5780804069,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),129,2.6540335667,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),114,2.7024578609,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),130,2.4148325417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,DZA,Algeria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),125,2.7260404459,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),127,2.3266882173,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),126,2.544959,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),91,3.3097332325,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),102,2.9149249848,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),122,2.6479383505,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EGY,Egypt,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),135,2.4076219992,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ESP,Spain,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),68,3.5141729161,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ESP,Spain,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),60,3.7316598057,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ESP,Spain,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),56,3.81954448,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,EST,Estonia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),32,4.3975201667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,EST,Estonia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),30,4.3708208994,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,EST,Estonia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),36,4.3045562073,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),52,3.8465061938,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),70,3.5465568875,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),94,3.2708652861,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FIN,Finland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),4,5.6445841721,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FIN,Finland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),3,5.598344113,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FIN,Finland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),2,5.735455,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,FRA,France,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),15,4.9349825941,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,FRA,France,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),28,4.5417346622,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,FRA,France,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),29,4.4507311287,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),62,3.717522,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GAB,Gabon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),54,3.8500529607,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),14,5.0169232308,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),8,5.2412097692,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),5,5.4604376818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),67,3.5155328681,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),69,3.573977,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GEO,Georgia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),65,3.6653531349,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),37,4.2271688036,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),40,4.0984624417,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GHA,Ghana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),31,4.3485238174,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),135,2.287908,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GIN,Guinea,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),139,2.3142493517,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),21,4.8169930575,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),23,4.7580583315,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),33,4.3396726951,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GRC,Greece,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),84,3.3020796472,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GRC,Greece,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),99,3.083918722,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GRC,Greece,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),106,3.0599160943,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),139,1.9830456,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),140,2.1566684621,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),143,2.0989972047,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),66,3.5265059,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),75,3.5073639121,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,GUY,Guyana,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),68,3.6199276818,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),41,4.1258153613,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),51,3.935275275,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),42,4.1269705302,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HND,Honduras,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),82,3.3204282685,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HND,Honduras,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),94,3.1384837778,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HND,Honduras,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),121,2.7781899433,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),87,3.2093401,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),90,3.2265410627,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HRV,Croatia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),92,3.3002564444,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),141,1.861434,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),143,1.9342635925,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HTI,Haiti,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),147,2.0513472397,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),61,3.5723211031,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),58,3.7830453739,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,HUN,Hungary,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),64,3.6659122403,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),79,3.3626299,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),77,3.4594889851,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),57,3.7880949086,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IND,India,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),44,4.0110464,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IND,India,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),53,3.9012197892,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IND,India,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),61,3.7373926077,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),43,4.0373117794,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),32,4.3026719189,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRL,Ireland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),28,4.4711277795,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),51,3.8616070221,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),50,3.9425106826,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),59,3.7656124734,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),48,3.921627162,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),67,3.6306679914,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISL,Iceland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),60,3.7384234875,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ISR,Israel,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),40,4.1661831572,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ISR,Israel,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),55,3.8849694153,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ISR,Israel,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),51,3.9554104405,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ITA,Italy,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),100,2.9255608242,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ITA,Italy,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),116,2.7863761732,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ITA,Italy,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),128,2.6635447814,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),62,3.5566334271,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),71,3.5327464492,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),90,3.315013586,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),110,2.8457169952,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),84,3.3250011048,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JOR,Jordan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),77,3.463487,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,JPN,Japan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),30,4.4165637983,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,JPN,Japan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),54,3.8971490806,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,JPN,Japan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),30,4.3593897274,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),54,3.797335,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),44,4.00198168,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),41,4.1638778429,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),81,3.3530007854,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),61,3.717901263,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KEN,Kenya,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),50,3.9888813358,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),135,2.2417900079,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),131,2.3355819,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),132,2.590771375,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),55,3.7942449352,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),48,3.9512757107,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),67,3.6234595882,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),123,2.42392195,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),118,2.7520035333,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),119,2.8283567318,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),64,3.5402115236,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),83,3.328530731,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),89,3.315922127,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),27,4.493608,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),132,2.2527391897,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),134,2.3032172791,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),145,2.0845904052,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),35,4.216157,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBR,Liberia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),71,3.5720133486,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LBY,Libya,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LBY,Libya,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),85,3.298318,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LBY,Libya,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),126,2.6909964,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),28,4.4429691586,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),25,4.66912,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),24,4.6614700122,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),101,2.9216024098,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),108,2.9740455952,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),53,3.8616379903,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),96,3.0063810079,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),98,3.0931972647,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),87,3.3303435918,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),5,5.5857173422,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),4,5.48660425,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),7,5.4286246618,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),98,2.9847185841,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),87,3.2910502774,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,LVA,Latvia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),82,3.4149180154,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),60,3.587073,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),64,3.6490372194,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MAR,Morocco,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),83,3.4142170885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),99,2.9686350761,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),103,2.9970522545,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDA,Moldova,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),120,2.7904741983,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),125,2.3906260781,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),129,2.4209991562,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),130,2.6442952803,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),128,2.3251064781,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),128,2.4355787794,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MEX,Mexico,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),114,2.9213963468,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),80,3.3621368485,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),68,3.5820766505,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),52,3.8879823123,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLI,Mali,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),70,3.4215107631,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLI,Mali,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),80,3.3907951221,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLI,Mali,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),108,3.0077744531,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MLT,Malta,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),24,4.5785051,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MLT,Malta,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),29,4.4426645273,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MLT,Malta,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),18,4.86338825,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),93,3.288913,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),42,4.093224842,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),42,4.0597665455,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),43,4.0710955948,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),111,2.8029516818,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),89,3.2331980959,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),109,2.9964794409,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),69,3.4443444863,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),78,3.4219760138,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),70,3.5768747618,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),130,2.3027903115,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),104,2.9921001157,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),131,2.6316102353,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),20,4.8175864851,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),19,4.847277357,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),21,4.7834669833,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),53,3.8383715667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),76,3.50451772,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MWI,Malawi,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),84,3.3776013155,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),12,5.0747671533,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),12,5.0617447789,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),16,4.9843644162,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),35,4.3710328256,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),38,4.1459277732,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NAM,Namibia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),40,4.1795831043,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),77,3.3747524111,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),66,3.6399112037,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),88,3.3165192563,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),138,2.0176427943,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),121,2.6614620235,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),99,3.2169815979,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),17,4.8502040242,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),11,5.085185968,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),14,4.9868379787,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NOR,Norway,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),10,5.2582761563,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NOR,Norway,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),7,5.2769442533,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NOR,Norway,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),8,5.392876872,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),133,2.245736615,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),125,2.5610753077,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NPL,Nepal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),137,2.382641,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),3,5.7529806404,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),2,5.7835575811,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),4,5.6735639728,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,OMN,Oman,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),8,5.3460201664,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,OMN,Oman,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),14,4.9817557122,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,OMN,Oman,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),12,5.082327,2012,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),93,3.0485164747,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),102,3.0245036292,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),102,3.144346725,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PAN,Panama,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),124,2.3964074795,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PAN,Panama,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),113,2.8449627124,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PAN,Panama,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),107,3.0109274255,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PER,Peru,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),140,1.8800374862,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PER,Peru,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),142,1.9946336211,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PER,Peru,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),144,2.0960698648,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),112,2.7475725143,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),93,3.1516004933,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PHL,Philippines,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),79,3.4574099965,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,POL,Poland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),71,3.4194624965,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,POL,Poland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),82,3.3334454921,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,POL,Poland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),96,3.2446944585,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),116,2.6654266932,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),115,2.7905936119,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),104,3.1302798789,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),75,3.4075677674,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),74,3.5100175976,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRT,Portugal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),74,3.5115115814,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),134,2.2451998502,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),138,2.2303518678,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),141,2.1834570145,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),45,4.006481,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),13,5.0395623409,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,QAT,Qatar,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),3,5.6753008297,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ROU,Romania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),115,2.6778351443,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ROU,Romania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),127,2.4710536531,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ROU,Romania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),127,2.6731133692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),91,3.0653108075,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),107,2.9794949418,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),95,3.2517361254,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),13,5.0520324507,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),9,5.238373,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),9,5.2996124314,2011–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),16,4.915522,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),26,4.6410304308,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),32,4.3481402094,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),104,2.8995519628,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),112,2.8491496957,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SEN,Senegal,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),80,3.4475517354,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),1,6.5255385022,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),1,6.3646657758,2011,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SGP,Singapore,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),1,6.1292999037,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),46,3.985851,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),48,4.0077366,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),122,2.45082425,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),137,2.2312449855,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),122,2.7621340692,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),95,3.0367277963,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),92,3.160312475,2010-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SRB,Serbia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),98,3.221405891,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),119,2.522133,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),119,2.7049949408,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SUR,Suriname,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),118,2.8309746989,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),97,3.0039924,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),97,3.0976185548,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),115,2.9176010615,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),90,3.114682,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),109,2.9619348341,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),123,2.7550382942,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),2,5.9348918145,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),5,5.4713170936,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWE,Sweden,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),6,5.4471490885,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),103,2.9097313263,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),110,2.9246189341,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),76,3.472945094,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),36,4.170937,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),37,4.2713533302,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,SYR,Syria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),105,2.8936337883,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,SYR,Syria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,SYR,Syria,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TCD,Chad,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),118,2.5297834996,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TCD,Chad,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),136,2.2839591647,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TCD,Chad,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),142,2.1156559855,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,THA,Thailand,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),85,3.228700543,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,THA,Thailand,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),105,2.9879405231,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,THA,Thailand,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),112,2.9615688217,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),39,4.1756825618,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),39,4.1088068838,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),57,3.6379924066,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),57,3.8130250242,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),72,3.5662117594,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),78,3.3709228333,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),73,3.5138161978,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),69,3.6025497827,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),46,3.9796827542,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),,,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),111,2.9771002922,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),31,4.4105971187,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),22,4.7583537006,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TUR,Turkey,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),19,4.8236609883,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),74,3.4115363135,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),72,3.5231369188,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),81,3.4329942681,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),58,3.6301940371,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),65,3.6479802052,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),75,3.4921002555,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),65,3.5395727319,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),45,3.9881543076,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UGA,Uganda,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),47,4.0105432689,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),137,2.1225525,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),132,2.3342905944,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),138,2.3606367899,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),59,3.6092241634,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),81,3.3874263755,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),66,3.6329432341,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,USA,United States,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),49,3.9188652045,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,USA,United States,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),56,3.8215426339,,,, +2014,USA,United States,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),58,3.7746021432,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),142,1.6507834241,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),144,1.6797205357,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),148,1.541981029,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),47,3.96739448,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),49,3.94577235,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),55,3.8491789512,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),131,2.283326,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),123,2.6473351048,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),134,2.477725672,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),33,4.38455755,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),31,4.3115130382,2011-2012 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 for details about the computation of this score,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gcr,01/08/2012 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),38,4.2462951565,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),50,3.8703520971,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),43,4.0186752022,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),34,4.3373841732,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),76,3.3882679667,2010–2011 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2011 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),96,3.1061131667,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,EOSQ037,1.01 Effectiveness of law-making bodies (1-7),100,3.1637111669,2012–2013 weighted average,Refer to Chapter 1.3 of The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum; Executive Opinion Survey; www.weforum.org/gitr,01/08/2013 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),133,2.6930814051,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),145,2.5186278147,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),89,3.4802136981,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),102,3.3082903213,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),117,3.1368369978,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),31,4.6644315913,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),26,4.8433925139,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),24,4.9129419418,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),122,2.9368386029,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),131,2.8224253312,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),135,2.775784735,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),112,3.0622474003,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),104,3.2689294431,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),104,3.3210742314,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),11,5.4830532566,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),10,5.3901830482,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),15,5.2338060071,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),14,5.3341338025,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),17,5.2085343291,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),18,5.1866526318,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),75,3.5986735325,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),66,3.7232778389,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),66,3.7469347362,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),141,2.3332164797,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),144,2.2953185599,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),146,2.4297020095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),26,4.8444459375,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),23,4.9367358483,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),21,5.0134176872,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),101,3.2697092213,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),94,3.4096844599,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),107,3.2475495522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),96,3.3599514814,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),88,3.4866426017,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),108,3.2396221147,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),130,2.7452821232,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),137,2.7126174516,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),138,2.6545965789,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),99,3.2992274249,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),101,3.3123047301,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),105,3.2883036327,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),35,4.5304111461,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),40,4.389080221,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),48,4.0729466756,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),108,3.1019744017,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),97,3.3641209652,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),76,3.5855343366,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),116,3.0259652599,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),118,2.9891572895,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),110,3.2172850223,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),109,3.239501954,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),77,3.591355586,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),78,3.629097999,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),78,3.5685251642,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),20,5.0921223358,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),32,4.590574615,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),35,4.4157569083,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),48,4.0252880664,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),45,4.1091695158,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),46,4.1530970523,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),43,4.1728285053,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),40,4.3313177321,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),39,4.4017749651,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),40,4.2600290786,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),12,5.3605495527,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),12,5.3617595234,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),12,5.3136343233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),7,5.6104907428,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),8,5.6038663522,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),9,5.5095353325,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),38,4.4515629445,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),38,4.4030647038,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),38,4.3392551245,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),46,4.0666603932,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),56,3.9725789076,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),56,3.9705618397,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),135,2.6786995217,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),128,2.8679225,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),116,3.1557569965,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),119,2.9820158476,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),126,2.9657069857,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),132,2.8679821119,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),82,3.5077496068,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),92,3.4145968434,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),96,3.4100339342,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),54,3.9502688343,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),55,3.9730716326,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),58,3.9092260412,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),67,3.7029427354,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),74,3.6625362196,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),63,3.7613203444,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),36,4.5280058129,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),41,4.3501137044,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),45,4.1577641322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),51,3.9973335054,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),46,4.0648282862,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),51,4.0468212523,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),13,5.3439048363,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),11,5.3844869001,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),10,5.4059201257,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),6,5.6348902111,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),14,5.3011252122,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),19,5.1567995075,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),104,3.1869752638,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),109,3.2185632949,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),110,3.2385525648,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),132,2.6995514982,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),141,2.463556242,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),140,2.6445063277,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),120,2.9775649914,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),118,3.0663456267,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),89,3.5080620422,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),76,3.5932127711,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),96,3.3890710267,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),115,3.1800485418,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),44,4.120288792,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),44,4.1364377076,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),47,4.0889701676,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),25,4.8488196456,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),27,4.8398471892,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),26,4.8327750033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),72,3.6401306483,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),83,3.5568268607,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),102,3.3706010711,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),4,5.7996804969,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),3,5.8434586013,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),3,5.8630221644,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),17,5.1676411363,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),20,5.0191283554,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),23,4.9728257947,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),107,3.2524552875,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),120,3.0978805941,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),10,5.5061717853,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),7,5.6243639025,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),5,5.6575404229,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),98,3.3062136565,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),100,3.3430694368,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),97,3.4006188366,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),55,3.9396586243,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),57,3.9185921152,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),41,4.1868437952,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),132,2.7745365756,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),139,2.6454366035,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),32,4.6052526163,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),30,4.6780668825,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),36,4.3860361315,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),87,3.4885362031,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),103,3.2948839978,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),114,3.1956024587,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),128,2.8127029047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),127,2.9246390547,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),123,3.023503412,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),81,3.5240336489,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),84,3.5545638949,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),64,3.7596844817,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),15,5.3226361865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),15,5.2749275289,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),11,5.4003617634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),100,3.2759848757,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),111,3.214775424,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),128,2.9463914349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),80,3.532987097,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),90,3.4783604238,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),88,3.5102860133,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),140,2.3787068362,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),143,2.4019290722,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),144,2.5810897916,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),45,4.0973440152,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),49,4.0449497912,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),54,3.9963074933,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),88,3.48430955,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),82,3.5714499273,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),68,3.7145133387,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),71,3.6536934439,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),75,3.6547244497,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),73,3.6404981652,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),18,5.164070156,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),16,5.2396793645,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),13,5.2902014546,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),78,3.5738981952,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),67,3.7013320314,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),86,3.526612127,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),22,4.9815981654,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),25,4.8807418765,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),27,4.8054099812,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),28,4.794263841,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),28,4.6909219018,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),28,4.6725202548,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),85,3.5048918843,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),95,3.3934083735,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),99,3.3907822075,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),56,3.91038219,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),59,3.8651180373,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),60,3.8157002438,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),58,3.8708906236,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),48,4.0497626682,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),44,4.1595250233,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),16,5.1763387923,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),19,5.0409506067,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),16,5.2288174806,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),92,3.4179784965,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),77,3.6342075785,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),61,3.7998383613,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),94,3.3818192971,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),87,3.4939388488,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),71,3.6741974375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),131,2.7267871113,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),136,2.7236610425,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),131,2.8878430844,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),73,3.6364176978,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),65,3.7456008749,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),95,3.4307244173,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),43,4.1434985828,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),42,4.2544401572,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),42,4.1814753685,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),60,3.8093997364,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),71,3.6744304245,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),75,3.6147167347,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),50,4.0590453597,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),129,2.7799122612,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),133,2.7586584127,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),142,2.6225750424,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),53,4.0100286358,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),92,3.4514413024,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),130,2.825872,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),141,2.6405348138,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),64,3.7507681502,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),68,3.7001716235,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),74,3.6213531282,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),115,3.0281274533,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),116,3.0916979838,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),90,3.4827147142,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),53,3.9516563465,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),51,4.0233555224,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),52,4.0165378748,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),5,5.7856482463,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),4,5.7727277952,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),4,5.7289577299,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),59,3.865634874,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),52,4.017705308,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),53,4.0149020396,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),68,3.6808836547,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),73,3.6637358744,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),81,3.5551955723,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),109,3.0815041567,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),117,3.0909267056,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),126,2.9792440995,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),134,2.6816025803,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),134,2.733527391,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),129,2.8953337512,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),86,3.5039694745,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),79,3.6027440511,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),70,3.6832430859,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),83,3.5052508628,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),80,3.5945145878,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),67,3.738565537,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),93,3.3948933002,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),99,3.3466517484,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),111,3.2275897155,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),30,4.6814346481,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),31,4.590867622,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),30,4.6271771833,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),137,2.6581467106,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),61,3.8022529694,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),72,3.6691752768,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),80,3.5578949041,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),105,3.1819032967,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),93,3.4130327505,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),98,3.3930379875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),97,3.3367263299,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),105,3.2588827011,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),113,3.2226836812,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),117,3.0131181481,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),113,3.1836154013,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),133,2.8586253081,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),39,4.3585662251,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),36,4.4223998269,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),33,4.4808763754,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),47,4.0464686619,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),63,3.7984514407,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),69,3.7014568232,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),24,4.8741132583,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),24,4.8822090842,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),25,4.8383705109,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),33,4.5982771081,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),37,4.4096115276,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),37,4.3835637169,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),91,3.4487273426,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),89,3.4825398414,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),112,3.2267171358,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),136,2.6637528788,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),122,3.0318209148,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),103,3.322901374,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),8,5.5495815866,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),6,5.6656105764,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),8,5.5250897308,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),9,5.5290154855,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),9,5.5222071466,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),7,5.5449266582,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),123,2.9310777981,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),119,3.0527690753,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),125,2.9892011317,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),3,5.8379683714,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),2,5.9230513763,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),2,5.8777272679,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),34,4.5930071334,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),34,4.4691526938,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),32,4.5426170796,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),110,3.0761484222,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),123,3.0278458098,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),124,3.0030814095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),84,3.5052357272,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),69,3.6871322427,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),62,3.7649058576,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),114,3.0486943386,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),121,3.0441233284,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),119,3.1009138694,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),107,3.147316359,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),98,3.3595096897,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),87,3.5129944741,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),66,3.747615718,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),62,3.79962341,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),65,3.7548985669,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),41,4.325285851,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),35,4.4604105833,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),29,4.6355931643,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),42,4.1956812182,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),43,4.2350332125,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),39,4.264444838,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),138,2.6279087588,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),138,2.6519065554,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),136,2.6588546413,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),27,4.8236175846,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),18,5.0972363534,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),14,5.2341058632,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),95,3.3698068229,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),106,3.2538467528,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),101,3.377174248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),102,3.2449579554,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),108,3.236615901,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),100,3.3874836442,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),19,5.0998624554,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),13,5.3022714779,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),17,5.2154329457,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),29,4.7548121393,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),29,4.6819130848,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),31,4.5904493386,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),106,3.1797864804,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),114,3.112816614,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),106,3.2638115192,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),1,5.9558590846,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),1,5.9736494913,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),1,5.89744846,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),86,3.5000779148,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),82,3.5531139106,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),121,2.9741262725,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),129,2.8593306298,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),121,3.095561153,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),113,3.0543927881,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),115,3.09651727,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),118,3.1127749755,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),137,2.6406523725,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),135,2.7298237908,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),134,2.836962776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),74,3.6299778899,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),70,3.6825807775,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),83,3.5503893604,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),57,3.8760972901,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),61,3.8100335471,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),72,3.6637794203,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),2,5.8611802342,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),5,5.6705830642,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),6,5.6331051325,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),103,3.2149205317,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),112,3.2140364793,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),84,3.5469925517,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),50,4.0321736376,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),49,4.0720021033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),126,2.8798290596,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),127,2.8187734965,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),139,2.5946447013,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),147,2.4266323031,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),69,3.6687188715,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),81,3.5880230914,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),79,3.5607082197,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),52,3.9721089752,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),47,4.0611012562,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),124,2.8959029605,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),125,3.0043109894,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),127,2.9473860871,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),90,3.478844009,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),91,3.4225518794,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),93,3.4457032692,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),49,4.0177286089,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),94,3.4425314702,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),62,3.8002332771,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),54,3.9741395073,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),55,3.9955307212,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),37,4.4731284636,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),33,4.5116650234,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),34,4.4317933432,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),65,3.7501987123,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),76,3.6499290748,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),85,3.5392872431,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),63,3.7841570583,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),60,3.8325643207,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),77,3.5728084467,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),125,2.8829284571,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),124,3.0143543541,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),130,2.8928257536,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),50,4.0124629818,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),58,3.9050362057,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),57,3.959911388,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),21,4.9949073418,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),22,4.9379267899,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),22,5.004127791,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),139,2.445346489,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),142,2.426607727,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),148,2.2969767442,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),79,3.5478867436,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),85,3.5090777962,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),91,3.4734628209,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),142,2.3068149631,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),140,2.5108495466,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),143,2.5820188544,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),23,4.9225079009,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),21,5.0047666181,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),20,5.047211214,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),70,3.6595132634,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),64,3.771951225,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),59,3.8192548382,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),111,3.0624416692,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),120,3.0477013134,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A.01,Pillar 1. Political and regulatory environment (1-7),122,3.0640360884,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),141,2.6309864626,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),147,2.5853851989,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),82,3.7008295306,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),84,3.7617584275,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),95,3.7214027251,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),28,4.8328706242,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),19,5.0462777167,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),18,5.096054295,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),122,3.2558925553,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),126,3.2498284652,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),135,3.192519491,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),110,3.418414471,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),90,3.6951637534,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),83,3.7994044098,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),12,5.2755417539,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),11,5.2923279657,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),14,5.2001790534,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),21,4.9336953079,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),22,4.9920205274,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),23,4.9707512875,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),77,3.7269023344,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),77,3.8418883993,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),70,3.9379019886,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),140,2.6310071753,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),142,2.6263671979,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),144,2.7277296932,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),22,4.9252745301,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),17,5.0852167993,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),19,5.0774269336,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),114,3.3481054698,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),115,3.4415099573,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),127,3.3299163349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),113,3.4048395221,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),110,3.4906526451,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),126,3.3451475423,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),123,3.2364607821,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),128,3.1944366823,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),132,3.2110988198,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),73,3.7844984991,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),68,3.9059901799,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),71,3.9369013957,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),27,4.8362712369,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),28,4.8307841482,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),40,4.5181115439,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),109,3.4279308858,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),92,3.6787178294,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),80,3.8316917217,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),121,3.2633613619,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),133,2.9824769975,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),129,3.192748432,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),131,3.2179615938,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),101,3.5239985899,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),107,3.5251117796,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),116,3.4475591987,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),29,4.8189277586,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),36,4.6298118369,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),38,4.5819973985,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),57,3.9852688763,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),57,4.0901854657,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),54,4.2012994582,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),76,3.8731337379,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),52,4.1037228042,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),56,4.1017626778,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),61,4.0522904059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),8,5.3290313926,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),10,5.4177416538,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),10,5.3850363697,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),6,5.3704068745,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),7,5.4641795045,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),9,5.4096459443,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),30,4.7195132752,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),30,4.8013806865,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),29,4.8303033062,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),64,3.8805485116,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),71,3.8761185036,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),77,3.8660362603,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),130,3.0313489477,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),127,3.2349010822,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),111,3.5152353339,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),118,3.297930464,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),119,3.3600052698,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),125,3.3477294302,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),94,3.6330990084,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),96,3.6440821008,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),101,3.6388227792,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),65,3.8770087258,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),65,3.9394044525,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),69,3.9443659386,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),90,3.6606823693,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),82,3.7795612471,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),64,3.9995777161,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),31,4.6926599046,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),34,4.6693251785,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),39,4.5678488822,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),50,4.1060932386,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),49,4.2101566852,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),49,4.2303960545,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),18,4.988285279,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),20,5.0450079386,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),17,5.1363636124,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),5,5.4386842763,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),12,5.2665416546,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),16,5.1851864735,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),97,3.5820999721,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),95,3.6500149619,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),97,3.6769502349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),136,2.8280488438,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),143,2.5995649228,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),143,2.7563032057,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),119,3.2969465885,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),113,3.4635206515,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),81,3.8144792044,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),85,3.6776983543,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),99,3.6183917332,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),119,3.4352328253,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),40,4.3934987901,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),40,4.4916646754,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),45,4.314419221,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),32,4.6926086203,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),31,4.7146215938,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),26,4.882845198,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),84,3.6925956786,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),104,3.5513107296,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),112,3.5042854989,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),2,5.5595085335,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),3,5.5913386057,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),3,5.6168341147,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),25,4.8674283917,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),27,4.8380879277,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),30,4.8213500466,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),123,3.309435492,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),134,3.2007409528,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),11,5.2797710016,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),6,5.4792050374,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),5,5.4952981847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),74,3.7703845186,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),73,3.8641267083,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),73,3.9087398242,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),63,3.8949143744,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),64,3.9536041433,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),48,4.2340847369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),139,2.8432029728,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),142,2.76893851,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),54,4.059667236,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),54,4.1306409093,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),68,3.9450197747,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),69,3.8503978105,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),87,3.7292367137,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),89,3.7602836437,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),116,3.3242752105,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),118,3.3879663924,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),105,3.590392158,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),86,3.668957018,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),81,3.7855312186,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),65,3.9956575401,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),7,5.341530214,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),8,5.4412206561,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),4,5.5616535274,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),107,3.4369988698,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),112,3.4655895164,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),129,3.3079685896,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),68,3.8516883767,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),70,3.8987377459,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),58,4.099819944,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),142,2.6214375354,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),141,2.6450585606,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),141,2.8373646596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),45,4.1859098913,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),47,4.234936406,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),50,4.2191412106,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),72,3.786544717,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),78,3.8332345571,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),63,4.0390345159,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),78,3.7245642305,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),85,3.7507997086,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),91,3.7554104067,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),20,4.9549602248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),15,5.1681856789,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),12,5.2713025483,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),80,3.7139924694,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),72,3.8649114452,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),86,3.7856063812,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),16,5.018981339,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),21,5.0154533018,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),20,5.0067261704,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),19,4.9790607455,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),23,4.9747546025,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),22,4.9726580323,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),75,3.7477876677,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),83,3.774982315,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),88,3.768550191,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),62,3.9326885626,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),67,3.9332421613,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),67,3.9575782013,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),48,4.162698307,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),42,4.34895233,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),41,4.4539438065,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),26,4.8546003273,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),26,4.8590174607,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),21,4.9896820907,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),81,3.7027342698,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),66,3.9332786375,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),57,4.1110447623,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),99,3.554700681,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),98,3.6272860624,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),92,3.7508958905,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),132,2.9892733771,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),137,3.0214258984,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),122,3.3870302249,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),89,3.6610491619,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),79,3.831040986,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),98,3.6647483303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),35,4.632959698,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),32,4.696323126,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),34,4.6840059082,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),56,3.9909688453,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),69,3.9004179953,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),78,3.8499944013,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),66,3.9916782344,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),92,3.6412974832,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),86,3.7437856337,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),103,3.6283904244,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),51,4.1727883589,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),82,3.8023688519,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),130,3.1829100176,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),136,3.1671721138,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),71,3.7947118488,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),63,3.9545190711,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),79,3.8498290095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),120,3.2846450401,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),121,3.3228350918,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),99,3.6627785582,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),46,4.1697656782,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),45,4.312662636,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),43,4.4053532769,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),13,5.2694363253,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),13,5.2535026869,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),11,5.3137138212,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),49,4.143336389,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),43,4.3316398338,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),42,4.4391560122,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),66,3.8596425375,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),74,3.8498184049,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),84,3.7940143191,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),106,3.4462958945,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),109,3.5151707925,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),121,3.4170856496,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),124,3.1987541327,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),125,3.2611296915,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),120,3.4325116509,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),79,3.7224835023,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),75,3.8458094552,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),75,3.8776480168,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),60,3.9510475062,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),59,4.0380221355,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),53,4.2065564161,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),104,3.4537637999,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),111,3.4674786432,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),117,3.4397522986,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),37,4.5979374949,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),39,4.5289692985,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),36,4.6241296853,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),146,2.6825499967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),47,4.1676967475,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),52,4.1581118959,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),52,4.2069706059,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),95,3.5945935452,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),76,3.8440736167,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),72,3.9099816408,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),108,3.4289278417,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),120,3.3555493087,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),124,3.3550443833,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),135,2.8539043908,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),136,3.0673033765,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),140,2.9061828664,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),41,4.380933905,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),41,4.4780504275,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),37,4.6132659621,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),70,3.8044245168,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),103,3.5773699459,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),107,3.5663445818,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),23,4.9196042111,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),18,5.0662806407,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),24,4.9531542387,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),44,4.215704782,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),58,4.0413235485,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),59,4.0963341866,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),98,3.5771995204,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),94,3.6553349106,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),109,3.5401694553,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),137,2.8247055592,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),134,3.1054452187,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),128,3.3180348284,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),9,5.3265762326,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),4,5.530372888,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),6,5.4841032135,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),10,5.323135851,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),9,5.418013421,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),7,5.464799614,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),125,3.1936715567,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),122,3.3101906041,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),123,3.3861600055,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),4,5.4813152746,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),2,5.6499702374,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),2,5.6251043904,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),36,4.6292524309,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),37,4.6095141096,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),33,4.692271425,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),112,3.4162288865,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),116,3.4183124243,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),118,3.4397308874,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),61,3.9470882861,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),48,4.2228472191,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),46,4.3071669124,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),93,3.6369820721,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),91,3.6945020771,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),93,3.7477089665,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),111,3.4163789376,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),100,3.5973401014,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),90,3.7601101943,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),58,3.9813511205,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),55,4.1032984761,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),55,4.1244258465,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),39,4.4217324736,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),35,4.6457957892,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),32,4.7494137321,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),38,4.4659143119,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),38,4.5731764866,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),35,4.6328016745,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),126,3.1764165283,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),124,3.2899873396,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),130,3.2992836232,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),15,5.0980266772,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),14,5.1930135112,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),13,5.2344431015,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),83,3.6944906099,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),89,3.6972118523,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),85,3.7873599023,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),100,3.5443461144,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),102,3.5799299912,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),87,3.7791326967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),33,4.6609692744,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),29,4.8133266466,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),28,4.8344476392,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),17,4.9967709307,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),25,4.8737028923,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),27,4.8573478849,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),88,3.6644240913,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),101,3.5961452481,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),100,3.6423051385,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),1,5.7345622262,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),1,5.8881795418,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),1,5.8669353063,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),114,3.4427015316,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),108,3.5533963608,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),103,3.4648032311,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),117,3.4062378959,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),110,3.5284136414,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),105,3.4480325362,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),106,3.5386725162,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),106,3.5781670596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),131,3.0212121494,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),135,3.0806353618,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),137,3.1562838646,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),67,3.8588682536,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),62,3.9923340291,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),74,3.902110862,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),42,4.3419217379,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),44,4.3308292824,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),47,4.2787688047,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),3,5.5072246789,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),5,5.4841854649,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),8,5.4474380529,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),128,3.0894412521,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),133,3.1213036479,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),113,3.4946864973,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),53,4.1402340123,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),62,4.046140737,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),115,3.3348140807,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),139,2.6780396614,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),144,2.5880260286,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),148,2.3956319691,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),59,3.9553091979,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),60,4.002483762,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),56,4.1241719537,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),87,3.6653775969,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),80,3.8001217176,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),129,3.0805203867,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),131,3.1809973153,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),138,3.1389543032,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),76,3.7321434658,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),93,3.6625042838,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),94,3.7272888054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),55,4.0227980925,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),102,3.6354657367,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),53,4.0645471156,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),46,4.3058463796,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),44,4.3827013564,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),24,4.8777199031,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),24,4.9742608625,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),25,4.9429738446,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),102,3.5145459514,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),108,3.5155594353,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),115,3.4668801927,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),91,3.6424428759,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),88,3.709684786,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),104,3.5930847269,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),117,3.3143865556,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),105,3.542570568,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),114,3.4846757249,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),43,4.2166919834,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),50,4.202882035,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),51,4.2114222365,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),14,5.1068549562,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),16,5.1115585699,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),15,5.1940419507,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),138,2.7807127846,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),140,2.8253511808,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),145,2.7239412912,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),96,3.5824446823,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),97,3.6281904781,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),96,3.6779575987,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),134,2.861329558,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),138,2.9070149007,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),139,2.9422645243,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),34,4.6460373422,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),33,4.6944138289,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),31,4.7621289935,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),51,4.1040614706,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),61,3.9948473819,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),60,4.073624319,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),127,3.1342031054,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gitr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),132,3.1323570307,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI.A,A. Environment subindex (1-7),133,3.2047812993,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gitr,22/04/2014 +2012,AGO,Angola,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),140,2.4908802374,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,AGO,Angola,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),144,2.5184885778,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ALB,Albania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),68,3.894909204,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ALB,Albania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),83,3.7519728833,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),95,3.6638228019,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),30,4.7667125559,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),25,5.0723126362,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),24,5.1989004455,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARG,Argentina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),92,3.5197841414,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARG,Argentina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),99,3.4718111576,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),100,3.5299445303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ARM,Armenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),94,3.4921483611,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ARM,Armenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),82,3.7621651853,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),65,4.0285195196,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUS,Australia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),17,5.289109786,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUS,Australia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),18,5.2573245403,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),18,5.3968963375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,AUT,Austria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),19,5.2541141664,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,AUT,Austria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),19,5.2494264008,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),22,5.2616798254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),61,3.9497947224,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),56,4.113763362,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),49,4.3109011634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BDI,Burundi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),137,2.5733467113,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BDI,Burundi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),144,2.304823954,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),147,2.3060043816,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEL,Belgium,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),22,5.1322223796,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEL,Belgium,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),24,5.0989779847,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),27,5.0618945691,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BEN,Benin,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),117,3.0484229209,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BEN,Benin,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),123,2.9685981887,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),135,2.8230118224,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),135,2.7229194803,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),130,2.7960249154,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),136,2.781788976,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),113,3.200297551,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),114,3.2195100096,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),119,3.2116453846,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),70,3.8915878867,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),71,3.8692438825,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),73,3.9579068176,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BHR,Bahrain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),27,4.898548412,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BHR,Bahrain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),29,4.829344231,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),29,4.8579534848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),84,3.6521874699,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),78,3.8039546221,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),68,3.9850927095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BLZ,Belize,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),119,3.0137120298,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BLZ,Belize,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BOL,Bolivia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),127,2.9217883872,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BOL,Bolivia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),119,3.0101321592,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),120,3.2078167589,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRA,Brazil,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),65,3.9161523532,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRA,Brazil,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),60,3.9694659805,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),69,3.9815309261,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRB,Barbados,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),35,4.6099678712,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRB,Barbados,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),39,4.4933812282,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),55,4.2242007118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),54,4.0389198915,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),57,4.1077720837,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),45,4.3407839718,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BTN,Bhutan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BTN,Bhutan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),94,3.6799700885,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,BWA,Botswana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),89,3.5832412971,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,BWA,Botswana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),96,3.4984234611,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),103,3.4334094319,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CAN,Canada,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),9,5.5053639714,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CAN,Canada,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),12,5.4421433984,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),17,5.4075158175,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHE,Switzerland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),5,5.6143995721,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHE,Switzerland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),6,5.6571919429,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),6,5.6244423303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHL,Chile,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),39,4.4392520521,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHL,Chile,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),34,4.5939091217,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),35,4.6082827475,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CHN,China,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),51,4.1119467356,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CHN,China,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),58,4.0318248373,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CHN,China,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),62,4.0513482622,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),122,2.9782805721,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),120,2.9972086729,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),122,3.1354430369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CMR,Cameroon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),125,2.9348132638,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CMR,Cameroon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),124,2.9497084065,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),131,2.9436636262,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,COL,Colombia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),73,3.869029393,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,COL,Colombia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),66,3.9087774928,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),63,4.0490661717,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),81,3.7115592749,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),81,3.7782262012,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),89,3.7337030776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),58,4.0041473061,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),53,4.1494046301,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),53,4.2472254248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CYP,Cyprus,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),32,4.6601127471,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CYP,Cyprus,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),35,4.5931048714,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),37,4.5956768576,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),42,4.3320903819,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),42,4.3769486915,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),42,4.4874935683,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,DEU,Germany,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),16,5.3244956449,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,DEU,Germany,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),13,5.4269212472,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),12,5.4999792009,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,DNK,Denmark,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),4,5.6969785755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,DNK,Denmark,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),8,5.5785379935,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),13,5.495961723,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),87,3.6046855057,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),90,3.6187998719,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),93,3.6915793365,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,DZA,Algeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),118,3.0142871676,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,DZA,Algeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),131,2.7827750911,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),129,2.9828233449,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ECU,Ecuador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),96,3.4561289167,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ECU,Ecuador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),91,3.5755186254,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),82,3.8546565322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,EGY,Egypt,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),79,3.7660590757,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,EGY,Egypt,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),80,3.7793841887,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),91,3.7126210461,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ESP,Spain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),38,4.540381274,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ESP,Spain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),38,4.5050742385,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),34,4.6868602298,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,EST,Estonia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),24,5.0925594553,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,EST,Estonia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),22,5.1166871238,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),21,5.2684752964,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),130,2.85312248,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),128,2.853040434,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),130,2.9493339847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,FIN,Finland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),3,5.8069448815,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,FIN,Finland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),1,5.9843531771,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),1,6.0362806076,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,FRA,France,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),23,5.1173203255,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,FRA,France,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),26,5.0558609585,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,FRA,France,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),25,5.0870695152,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GAB,Gabon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GAB,Gabon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),121,2.9717987716,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),128,2.9848027517,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),10,5.5000218964,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),7,5.635390863,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),9,5.5437607374,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GEO,Georgia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),88,3.5963908255,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GEO,Georgia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),65,3.9251906009,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),60,4.0920566008,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GHA,Ghana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),97,3.4425399671,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GHA,Ghana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),95,3.5111737193,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),96,3.6473434906,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GIN,Guinea,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GIN,Guinea,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),140,2.6098665305,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),145,2.4836747858,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),101,3.4087975715,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),98,3.4719184297,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),107,3.382436715,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GRC,Greece,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),59,3.9928485849,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GRC,Greece,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),64,3.9263441148,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),74,3.9497148685,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GTM,Guatemala,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),98,3.4314828099,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GTM,Guatemala,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),102,3.4234548486,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),101,3.5210069262,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,GUY,Guyana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),90,3.5810267755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,GUY,Guyana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),100,3.4478357163,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),88,3.767317522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),13,5.4580403676,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),14,5.4028004119,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),8,5.5994452466,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,HND,Honduras,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),99,3.4269601726,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,HND,Honduras,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),109,3.3163277608,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),116,3.2385437898,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,HRV,Croatia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),45,4.2182569632,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,HRV,Croatia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),51,4.1712281311,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),46,4.3381854897,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,HTI,Haiti,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),142,2.2729648824,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,HTI,Haiti,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),141,2.5846005227,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),143,2.521997459,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,HUN,Hungary,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),43,4.3001598443,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,HUN,Hungary,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),44,4.2930957288,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),47,4.3200118135,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,IDN,Indonesia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),80,3.7450113584,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,IDN,Indonesia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),76,3.8422731916,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),64,4.0405558354,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,IND,India,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),69,3.893635903,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,IND,India,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),68,3.8823268555,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IND,India,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),83,3.8466710775,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRL,Ireland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),25,5.01545505,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRL,Ireland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),27,5.0516218035,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),26,5.0663348895,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),104,3.3612089879,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),101,3.4253966582,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),104,3.4188459128,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISL,Iceland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),15,5.3274133209,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISL,Iceland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),17,5.311313079,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),19,5.303444573,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ISR,Israel,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),20,5.2364350755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ISR,Israel,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),15,5.3865423126,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),15,5.4248819967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ITA,Italy,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),48,4.1689865823,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ITA,Italy,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),50,4.1816240969,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),58,4.175924653,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,JAM,Jamaica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),74,3.8586995898,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,JAM,Jamaica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),85,3.7374087404,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),86,3.7724100165,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,JOR,Jordan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),47,4.1746019195,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,JOR,Jordan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),47,4.2013671313,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),44,4.361906462,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,JPN,Japan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),18,5.2549331111,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,JPN,Japan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),21,5.239313633,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),16,5.41025285,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),55,4.0253273938,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),43,4.3195807961,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),38,4.5824247961,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,KEN,Kenya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),93,3.5144449103,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,KEN,Kenya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),92,3.5387041478,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),92,3.7103682498,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),115,3.1275285929,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),118,3.0895338527,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),118,3.2152272497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,KHM,Cambodia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),108,3.3162383938,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,KHM,Cambodia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),106,3.3383904215,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),108,3.3618368453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),12,5.4691439402,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),11,5.4567725659,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),10,5.5424564707,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,KWT,Kuwait,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),62,3.9495469526,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,KWT,Kuwait,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),62,3.935722188,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),72,3.9623735568,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),109,3.3385591702,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBN,Lebanon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),95,3.48901387,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBN,Lebanon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),94,3.5255483888,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),97,3.6436480177,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBR,Liberia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBR,Liberia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),97,3.484917367,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),121,3.1883240976,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LBY,Libya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LBY,Libya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),132,2.7665491079,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),138,2.7457121306,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),71,3.8836777829,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),69,3.881439064,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),76,3.9356887435,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LSO,Lesotho,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),133,2.7750747671,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LSO,Lesotho,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),138,2.6841354844,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),133,2.8838126073,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LTU,Lithuania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),31,4.6632572955,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LTU,Lithuania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),32,4.7179546769,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),31,4.7840387936,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),21,5.2220888713,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),16,5.3682079741,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),11,5.5301281033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,LVA,Latvia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),41,4.3468866411,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,LVA,Latvia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),41,4.4339645304,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),39,4.5818676588,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MAR,Morocco,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),91,3.5552977158,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MAR,Morocco,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),89,3.6420027623,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),99,3.6065645107,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDA,Moldova,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),78,3.7779739465,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDA,Moldova,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),77,3.8383182267,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),77,3.8932421347,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MDG,Madagascar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),134,2.7251579804,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MDG,Madagascar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),137,2.6900339953,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),139,2.7375180368,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MEX,Mexico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),76,3.8236836126,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MEX,Mexico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),63,3.9291082542,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),79,3.8884015596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),66,3.9089733293,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),67,3.8867392128,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),57,4.1934613848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLI,Mali,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),126,2.9297154748,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLI,Mali,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),122,2.9713354837,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),127,2.9968831157,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MLT,Malta,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),26,4.9077871513,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MLT,Malta,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),28,4.9002736774,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),28,4.9632648693,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MMR,Myanmar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MMR,Myanmar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),146,2.3493181678,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNE,Montenegro,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),46,4.2164963774,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNE,Montenegro,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),48,4.1991392326,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),52,4.2690550302,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MNG,Mongolia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),63,3.9458852936,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MNG,Mongolia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),59,4.0094397855,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),61,4.0724874028,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),120,2.98671418,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),133,2.7642487363,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),137,2.7741439145,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MRT,Mauritania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),139,2.546470701,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MRT,Mauritania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),135,2.7086021224,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),142,2.6120943332,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MUS,Mauritius,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),53,4.0601376047,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MUS,Mauritius,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),55,4.1239373317,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),48,4.314352118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MWI,Malawi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),116,3.0544751477,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MWI,Malawi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),129,2.8287910461,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),132,2.9032165504,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,MYS,Malaysia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),29,4.7991498839,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,MYS,Malaysia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),30,4.8232739989,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),30,4.8290820751,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NAM,Namibia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),105,3.3499285738,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NAM,Namibia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),111,3.29483705,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),105,3.4122013349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NGA,Nigeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),112,3.2232898085,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NGA,Nigeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),113,3.2656197919,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),112,3.3119251996,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),131,2.8414702045,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),125,2.9317606081,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),124,3.0829491088,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NLD,Netherlands,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),6,5.6025220396,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NLD,Netherlands,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),4,5.8080819916,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),4,5.7904540737,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NOR,Norway,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),7,5.592333085,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NOR,Norway,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),5,5.6585817987,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),5,5.7048157834,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NPL,Nepal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),128,2.9209183324,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NPL,Nepal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),126,2.9306283294,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),123,3.0941273838,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,NZL,New Zealand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),14,5.3641585724,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,NZL,New Zealand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),20,5.2482623409,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),20,5.2688875541,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,OMN,Oman,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),40,4.3527464231,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,OMN,Oman,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),40,4.4823606489,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),40,4.5580852477,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAK,Pakistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),102,3.3925983798,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAK,Pakistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),105,3.3463011063,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),111,3.327323646,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PAN,Panama,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),57,4.0066710432,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PAN,Panama,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),46,4.2209353365,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),43,4.3641318236,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PER,Peru,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),106,3.3381270611,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PER,Peru,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),103,3.3862936276,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),90,3.7283988476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PHL,Philippines,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),86,3.6392550005,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PHL,Philippines,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),86,3.7280550734,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),78,3.8915283709,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,POL,Poland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),49,4.1597559564,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,POL,Poland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),49,4.1890314233,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),54,4.2424919333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),36,4.5931751806,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),36,4.5520117933,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),41,4.5417652426,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRT,Portugal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),33,4.6290379086,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRT,Portugal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),33,4.6670780617,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),33,4.7254850295,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,PRY,Paraguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),111,3.2502429136,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,PRY,Paraguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),104,3.3724268043,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),102,3.4731200312,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,QAT,Qatar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),28,4.8128718447,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,QAT,Qatar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),23,5.1002450256,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),23,5.2215494566,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ROU,Romania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),67,3.9005047694,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ROU,Romania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),75,3.8622943319,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),75,3.9480902054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),56,4.0174430429,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),54,4.1261548044,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),50,4.3039300687,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,RWA,Rwanda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),82,3.7001563626,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,RWA,Rwanda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),88,3.6816577789,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),85,3.7795299956,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),34,4.6167367337,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),31,4.8180385752,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),32,4.7839773696,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SEN,Senegal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),100,3.4155681869,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SEN,Senegal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),107,3.3340951009,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),114,3.296411631,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SGP,Singapore,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),2,5.856074152,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SGP,Singapore,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),2,5.9607767641,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),2,5.9675434628,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),143,2.5254282929,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),134,2.8506422022,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SLV,El Salvador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),103,3.3795988358,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SLV,El Salvador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),93,3.5346181952,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),98,3.6298063188,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SRB,Serbia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),85,3.6431799774,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SRB,Serbia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),87,3.6982888593,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),80,3.8827278184,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SUR,Suriname,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),121,2.9850889755,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SUR,Suriname,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),117,3.1269617423,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),113,3.302756934,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),64,3.93519644,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),61,3.954659308,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),59,4.1151933257,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SVN,Slovenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),37,4.5841618399,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SVN,Slovenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),37,4.5335800574,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),36,4.5972060723,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWE,Sweden,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),1,5.9405893025,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWE,Sweden,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),3,5.9095264644,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),3,5.9299052098,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),136,2.6959146159,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),136,2.6925208142,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),126,3.0030981645,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYC,Seychelles,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYC,Seychelles,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),79,3.8033922334,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),66,4.0228429668,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,SYR,Syria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),129,2.8539379177,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,SYR,Syria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TCD,Chad,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),138,2.5530368588,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TCD,Chad,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),142,2.532810037,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),148,2.2237677956,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,THA,Thailand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),77,3.7843244002,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,THA,Thailand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),74,3.8639498426,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),67,4.0064705761,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),114,3.1856846686,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),112,3.2909151571,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),132,2.8369987759,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),134,2.7241998084,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),141,2.6913273904,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),60,3.9768644417,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),72,3.8690930928,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),71,3.9728957052,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUN,Tunisia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),50,4.1164906565,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUN,Tunisia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),87,3.7711375232,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TUR,Turkey,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),52,4.0723644737,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TUR,Turkey,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),45,4.2224086796,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),51,4.2966285544,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),11,5.4815688201,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),10,5.4683323814,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),14,5.4717609096,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,TZA,Tanzania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),123,2.9477027071,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,TZA,Tanzania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),127,2.9210861427,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),125,3.0385120675,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,UGA,Uganda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),110,3.2549262157,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,UGA,Uganda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),110,3.3044132772,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),115,3.2537455821,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,UKR,Ukraine,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),75,3.8461172499,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,UKR,Ukraine,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),73,3.86684305,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),81,3.8685868482,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,URY,Uruguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),44,4.2778474078,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,URY,Uruguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),52,4.1579625551,,,, +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),56,4.2179846642,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,USA,United States,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),8,5.5609166258,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,USA,United States,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),9,5.5739352442,,,, +2014,USA,United States,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),7,5.6138370753,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,VEN,Venezuela,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),107,3.3183460056,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,VEN,Venezuela,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),108,3.3299085658,,,, +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),106,3.3926930434,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,VNM,Vietnam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),83,3.6993820774,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,VNM,Vietnam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),84,3.7419042099,,,, +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),84,3.8362233133,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,YEM,Yemen,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),141,2.4132122921,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,YEM,Yemen,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),139,2.6250822812,,,, +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),140,2.7311018914,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZAF,South Africa,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),72,3.8698347789,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZAF,South Africa,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),70,3.8743623387,2013 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology Report 2013 for details about the computation,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2013;www.weforum.org/gitr,01/4/2013 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),70,3.9756260071,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZMB,Zambia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),109,3.2565095702,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZMB,Zambia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),115,3.194139246,,,, +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),110,3.3385381499,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2012,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),124,2.9360330947,2012 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2012 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2012; www.weforum.org/gcr,24/04/2012 +2013,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),116,3.1702577087,,,, +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),117,3.2378150519,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 diff --git a/data/gitr2014_nri.csv b/data/gitr2014_nri.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f077723 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/gitr2014_nri.csv @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ +Edition,Entity_code,Entity,GLOBAL_ID,Series_with_units,Rank,Value,Date_description,Note,Source,Source_date +2014,AGO,Angola,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),144,2.5184885778,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ALB,Albania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),95,3.6638228019,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ARE,United Arab Emirates,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),24,5.1989004455,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ARG,Argentina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),100,3.5299445303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ARM,Armenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),65,4.0285195196,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,AUS,Australia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),18,5.3968963375,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,AUT,Austria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),22,5.2616798254,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,AZE,Azerbaijan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),49,4.3109011634,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BDI,Burundi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),147,2.3060043816,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BEL,Belgium,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),27,5.0618945691,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BEN,Benin,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),135,2.8230118224,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BFA,Burkina Faso,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),136,2.781788976,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BGD,Bangladesh,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),119,3.2116453846,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BGR,Bulgaria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),73,3.9579068176,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BHR,Bahrain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),29,4.8579534848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BIH,Bosnia and Herzegovina,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),68,3.9850927095,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BLZ,Belize,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BOL,Bolivia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),120,3.2078167589,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BRA,Brazil,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),69,3.9815309261,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BRB,Barbados,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),55,4.2242007118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BRN,Brunei Darussalam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),45,4.3407839718,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BTN,Bhutan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),94,3.6799700885,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,BWA,Botswana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),103,3.4334094319,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CAN,Canada,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),17,5.4075158175,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CHE,Switzerland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),6,5.6244423303,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CHL,Chile,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),35,4.6082827475,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CHN,China,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),62,4.0513482622,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CIV,Côte d'Ivoire,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),122,3.1354430369,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CMR,Cameroon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),131,2.9436636262,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,COL,Colombia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),63,4.0490661717,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CPV,Cape Verde,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),89,3.7337030776,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CRI,Costa Rica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),53,4.2472254248,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CYP,Cyprus,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),37,4.5956768576,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,CZE,Czech Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),42,4.4874935683,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,DEU,Germany,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),12,5.4999792009,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,DNK,Denmark,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),13,5.495961723,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,DOM,Dominican Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),93,3.6915793365,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,DZA,Algeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),129,2.9828233449,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ECU,Ecuador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),82,3.8546565322,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,EGY,Egypt,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),91,3.7126210461,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ESP,Spain,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),34,4.6868602298,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,EST,Estonia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),21,5.2684752964,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ETH,Ethiopia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),130,2.9493339847,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,FIN,Finland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),1,6.0362806076,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,FRA,France,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),25,5.0870695152,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GAB,Gabon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),128,2.9848027517,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GBR,United Kingdom,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),9,5.5437607374,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GEO,Georgia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),60,4.0920566008,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GHA,Ghana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),96,3.6473434906,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GIN,Guinea,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),145,2.4836747858,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GMB,"Gambia, The",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),107,3.382436715,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GRC,Greece,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),74,3.9497148685,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GTM,Guatemala,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),101,3.5210069262,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,GUY,Guyana,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),88,3.767317522,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,HKG,Hong Kong SAR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),8,5.5994452466,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,HND,Honduras,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),116,3.2385437898,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,HRV,Croatia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),46,4.3381854897,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,HTI,Haiti,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),143,2.521997459,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,HUN,Hungary,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),47,4.3200118135,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,IDN,Indonesia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),64,4.0405558354,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,IND,India,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),83,3.8466710775,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,IRL,Ireland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),26,5.0663348895,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,IRN,"Iran, Islamic Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),104,3.4188459128,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ISL,Iceland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),19,5.303444573,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ISR,Israel,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),15,5.4248819967,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ITA,Italy,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),58,4.175924653,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,JAM,Jamaica,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),86,3.7724100165,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,JOR,Jordan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),44,4.361906462,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,JPN,Japan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),16,5.41025285,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,KAZ,Kazakhstan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),38,4.5824247961,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,KEN,Kenya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),92,3.7103682498,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,KGZ,Kyrgyz Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),118,3.2152272497,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,KHM,Cambodia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),108,3.3618368453,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,KOR,"Korea, Rep.",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),10,5.5424564707,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,KWT,Kuwait,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),72,3.9623735568,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LAO,Lao PDR,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),109,3.3385591702,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LBN,Lebanon,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),97,3.6436480177,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LBR,Liberia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),121,3.1883240976,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LBY,Libya,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),138,2.7457121306,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LKA,Sri Lanka,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),76,3.9356887435,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LSO,Lesotho,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),133,2.8838126073,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LTU,Lithuania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),31,4.7840387936,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LUX,Luxembourg,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),11,5.5301281033,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,LVA,Latvia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),39,4.5818676588,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MAR,Morocco,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),99,3.6065645107,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MDA,Moldova,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),77,3.8932421347,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MDG,Madagascar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),139,2.7375180368,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MEX,Mexico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),79,3.8884015596,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MKD,"Macedonia, FYR",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),57,4.1934613848,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MLI,Mali,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),127,2.9968831157,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MLT,Malta,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),28,4.9632648693,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MMR,Myanmar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),146,2.3493181678,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MNE,Montenegro,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),52,4.2690550302,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MNG,Mongolia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),61,4.0724874028,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MOZ,Mozambique,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),137,2.7741439145,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MRT,Mauritania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),142,2.6120943332,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MUS,Mauritius,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),48,4.314352118,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MWI,Malawi,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),132,2.9032165504,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,MYS,Malaysia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),30,4.8290820751,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NAM,Namibia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),105,3.4122013349,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NGA,Nigeria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),112,3.3119251996,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NIC,Nicaragua,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),124,3.0829491088,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NLD,Netherlands,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),4,5.7904540737,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NOR,Norway,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),5,5.7048157834,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NPL,Nepal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),123,3.0941273838,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,NZL,New Zealand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),20,5.2688875541,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,OMN,Oman,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),40,4.5580852477,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PAK,Pakistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),111,3.327323646,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PAN,Panama,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),43,4.3641318236,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PER,Peru,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),90,3.7283988476,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PHL,Philippines,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),78,3.8915283709,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,POL,Poland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),54,4.2424919333,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PRI,Puerto Rico,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),41,4.5417652426,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PRT,Portugal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),33,4.7254850295,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,PRY,Paraguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),102,3.4731200312,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,QAT,Qatar,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),23,5.2215494566,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ROU,Romania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),75,3.9480902054,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,RUS,Russian Federation,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),50,4.3039300687,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,RWA,Rwanda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),85,3.7795299956,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SAU,Saudi Arabia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),32,4.7839773696,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SEN,Senegal,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),114,3.296411631,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SGP,Singapore,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),2,5.9675434628,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SLE,Sierra Leone,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),134,2.8506422022,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SLV,El Salvador,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),98,3.6298063188,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SRB,Serbia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),80,3.8827278184,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SUR,Suriname,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),113,3.302756934,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SVK,Slovak Republic,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),59,4.1151933257,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SVN,Slovenia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),36,4.5972060723,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SWE,Sweden,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),3,5.9299052098,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SWZ,Swaziland,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),126,3.0030981645,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SYC,Seychelles,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),66,4.0228429668,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,SYR,Syria,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TCD,Chad,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),148,2.2237677956,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,THA,Thailand,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),67,4.0064705761,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TJK,Tajikistan,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),,,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TLS,Timor-leste,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),141,2.6913273904,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TTO,Trinidad and Tobago,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),71,3.9728957052,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TUN,Tunisia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),87,3.7711375232,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TUR,Turkey,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),51,4.2966285544,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TWN,"Taiwan, China",NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),14,5.4717609096,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,TZA,Tanzania,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),125,3.0385120675,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,UGA,Uganda,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),115,3.2537455821,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,UKR,Ukraine,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),81,3.8685868482,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,URY,Uruguay,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),56,4.2179846642,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,USA,United States,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),7,5.6138370753,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,VEN,Venezuela,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),106,3.3926930434,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,VNM,Vietnam,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),84,3.8362233133,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,YEM,Yemen,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),140,2.7311018914,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ZAF,South Africa,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),70,3.9756260071,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ZMB,Zambia,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),110,3.3385381499,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 +2014,ZWE,Zimbabwe,NRI,Networked Readiness Index (1-7),117,3.2378150519,2014 edition,Refer to Chapter 1.1 of The Global Information Technology 2014 for details about the computation methodology,World Economic Forum;The Global Information Technology Report 2014; www.weforum.org/gcr,22/04/2014 diff --git a/data/gitr2014_nri.ods b/data/gitr2014_nri.ods new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c35942b Binary files /dev/null and b/data/gitr2014_nri.ods differ diff --git a/data/population.csv b/data/population.csv new file mode 100755 index 0000000..2390a89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/population.csv @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ +Country_Name,Country_Code,Population +Aruba,ABW,102384 +Andorra,AND,78360 +Afghanistan,AFG,29824536 +Angola,AGO,20820525 +Albania,ALB,3162083 +Arab World,ARB,362466629 +United Arab Emirates,ARE,9205651 +Argentina,ARG,41086927 +Armenia,ARM,2969081 +American Samoa,ASM,55128 +Antigua and Barbuda,ATG,89069 +Australia,AUS,22722000 +Austria,AUT,8429991 +Azerbaijan,AZE,9295784 +Burundi,BDI,9849569 +Belgium,BEL,11128246 +Benin,BEN,10050702 +Burkina Faso,BFA,16460141 +Bangladesh,BGD,154695368 +Bulgaria,BGR,7305888 +Bahrain,BHR,1317827 +"Bahamas, The",BHS,371960 +Bosnia and Herzegovina,BIH,3833916 +Belarus,BLR,9464000 +Belize,BLZ,324060 +Bermuda,BMU,64806 +Bolivia,BOL,10496285 +Brazil,BRA,198656019 +Barbados,BRB,283221 +Brunei Darussalam,BRN,412238 +Bhutan,BTN,741822 +Botswana,BWA,2003910 +Sub-Saharan Africa (IFC classification),CAA, +Central African Republic,CAF,4525209 +Canada,CAN,34754312 +East Asia and the Pacific (IFC classification),CEA, +Europe and Central Asia (IFC classification),CEU, +Switzerland,CHE,7996861 +Channel Islands,CHI,161235 +Chile,CHL,17464814 +China,CHN,1350695000 +Cote d'Ivoire,CIV,19839750 +Latin America and the Caribbean (IFC classification),CLA, +Middle East and North Africa (IFC classification),CME, +Cameroon,CMR,21699631 +"Congo, Rep.",COG,4337051 +Colombia,COL,47704427 +Comoros,COM,717503 +Cabo Verde,CPV,494401 +Costa Rica,CRI,4805295 +South Asia (IFC classification),CSA, +Caribbean small states,CSS,6964458 +Cuba,CUB,11270957 +Curacao,CUW,152056 +Cayman Islands,CYM,57570 +Cyprus,CYP,1128994 +Czech Republic,CZE,10510785 +Germany,DEU,80425823 +Djibouti,DJI,859652 +Dominica,DMA,71684 +Denmark,DNK,5591572 +Dominican Republic,DOM,10276621 +Algeria,DZA,38481705 +East Asia & Pacific (developing only),EAP,1991616400 +East Asia & Pacific (all income levels),EAS,2233783501 +Europe & Central Asia (developing only),ECA,270781183 +Europe & Central Asia (all income levels),ECS,896046189 +Ecuador,ECU,15492264 +"Egypt, Arab Rep.",EGY,80721874 +Euro area,EMU,333252928 +Eritrea,ERI,6130922 +Spain,ESP,46761264 +Estonia,EST,1329301 +Ethiopia,ETH,91728849 +European Union,EUU,505581611 +Finland,FIN,5413971 +Fiji,FJI,874742 +France,FRA,65696689 +Faeroe Islands,FRO,49506 +"Micronesia, Fed. Sts.",FSM,103395 +Gabon,GAB,1632572 +United Kingdom,GBR,63612729 +Georgia,GEO,4490700 +Ghana,GHA,25366462 +Guinea,GIN,11451273 +"Gambia, The",GMB,1791225 +Guinea-Bissau,GNB,1663558 +Equatorial Guinea,GNQ,736296 +Greece,GRC,11092771 +Grenada,GRD,105483 +Greenland,GRL,56810 +Guatemala,GTM,15082831 +Guam,GUM,162810 +Guyana,GUY,795369 +High income,HIC,1299840043 +"Hong Kong SAR, China",HKG,7154600 +Honduras,HND,7935846 +Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC),HPC,655971763 +Croatia,HRV,4267600 +Haiti,HTI,10173775 +Hungary,HUN,9920362 +Indonesia,IDN,246864191 +Isle of Man,IMN,85284 +India,IND,1236686732 +Not classified,INX, +Ireland,IRL,4586897 +"Iran, Islamic Rep.",IRN,76424443 +Iraq,IRQ,32578209 +Iceland,ISL,320716 +Israel,ISR,7910500 +Italy,ITA,59539717 +Jamaica,JAM,2707805 +Jordan,JOR,6318000 +Japan,JPN,127561489 +Kazakhstan,KAZ,16791425 +Kenya,KEN,43178141 +Kyrgyz Republic,KGZ,5607200 +Cambodia,KHM,14864646 +Kiribati,KIR,100786 +St. Kitts and Nevis,KNA,53584 +"Korea, Rep.",KOR,50004441 +Kosovo,KSV,1807106 +Kuwait,KWT,3250496 +Latin America & Caribbean (developing only),LAC,581379260 +Lao PDR,LAO,6645827 +Lebanon,LBN,4424888 +Liberia,LBR,4190435 +Libya,LBY,6154623 +St. Lucia,LCA,180870 +Latin America & Caribbean (all income levels),LCN,608561443 +Least developed countries: UN classification,LDC,878193577 +Low income,LIC,846480001 +Liechtenstein,LIE,36656 +Sri Lanka,LKA,20328000 +Lower middle income,LMC,2506986571 +Low & middle income,LMY,5744062847 +Lesotho,LSO,2051545 +Lithuania,LTU,2987773 +Luxembourg,LUX,530946 +Latvia,LVA,2034319 +"Macao SAR, China",MAC,556783 +St. Martin (French part),MAF,30959 +Morocco,MAR,32521143 +Monaco,MCO,37579 +Moldova,MDA,3559519 +Madagascar,MDG,22293914 +Maldives,MDV,338442 +Middle East & North Africa (all income levels),MEA,395316900 +Mexico,MEX,120847477 +Marshall Islands,MHL,52555 +Middle income,MIC,4897582846 +"Macedonia, FYR",MKD,2105575 +Mali,MLI,14853572 +Malta,MLT,419455 +Myanmar,MMR,52797319 +Middle East & North Africa (developing only),MNA,339560601 +Montenegro,MNE,621081 +Mongolia,MNG,2796484 +Northern Mariana Islands,MNP,53305 +Mozambique,MOZ,25203395 +Mauritania,MRT,3796141 +Mauritius,MUS,1291456 +Malawi,MWI,15906483 +Malaysia,MYS,29239927 +North America,NAC,348733158 +Namibia,NAM,2259393 +New Caledonia,NCL,258121 +Niger,NER,17157042 +Nigeria,NGA,168833776 +Nicaragua,NIC,5991733 +Netherlands,NLD,16754962 +High income: nonOECD,NOC,250298704 +Norway,NOR,5018573 +Nepal,NPL,27474377 +New Zealand,NZL,4433100 +High income: OECD,OEC,1049541339 +OECD members,OED,1254306306 +Oman,OMN,3314001 +Other small states,OSS,19920475 +Pakistan,PAK,179160111 +Panama,PAN,3802281 +Peru,PER,29987800 +Philippines,PHL,96706764 +Palau,PLW,20754 +Papua New Guinea,PNG,7167010 +Poland,POL,38535873 +Puerto Rico,PRI,3667084 +"Korea, Dem. Rep.",PRK,24763188 +Portugal,PRT,10514844 +Paraguay,PRY,6687361 +Pacific island small states,PSS,2252782 +French Polynesia,PYF,273814 +Qatar,QAT,2050514 +Romania,ROU,20076727 +Russian Federation,RUS,143533000 +Rwanda,RWA,11457801 +South Asia,SAS,1649249388 +Saudi Arabia,SAU,28287855 +Sudan,SDN,37195349 +Senegal,SEN,13726021 +Singapore,SGP,5312400 +Solomon Islands,SLB,549598 +Sierra Leone,SLE,5978727 +El Salvador,SLV,6297394 +San Marino,SMR,31247 +Somalia,SOM,10195134 +Serbia,SRB,7223887 +Sub-Saharan Africa (developing only),SSA,911476015 +South Sudan,SSD,10837527 +Sub-Saharan Africa (all income levels),SSF,912212311 +Small states,SST,29137715 +Sao Tome and Principe,STP,188098 +Suriname,SUR,534541 +Slovak Republic,SVK,5407579 +Slovenia,SVN,2057159 +Sweden,SWE,9519374 +Swaziland,SWZ,1230985 +Sint Maarten (Dutch part),SXM,39088 +Seychelles,SYC,88303 +Syrian Arab Republic,SYR,22399254 +Turks and Caicos Islands,TCA,32427 +Chad,TCD,12448175 +Togo,TGO,6642928 +Thailand,THA,66785001 +Tajikistan,TJK,8008990 +Turkmenistan,TKM,5172931 +Timor-Leste,TLS,1210233 +Tonga,TON,104941 +Trinidad and Tobago,TTO,1337439 +Tunisia,TUN,10777500 +Turkey,TUR,73997128 +Tuvalu,TUV,9860 +Tanzania,TZA,47783107 +Uganda,UGA,36345860 +Ukraine,UKR,45593300 +Upper middle income,UMC,2390596275 +Uruguay,URY,3395253 +United States,USA,313914040 +Uzbekistan,UZB,29774500 +St. Vincent and the Grenadines,VCT,109373 +"Venezuela, RB",VEN,29954782 +Virgin Islands (U.S.),VIR,105275 +Vietnam,VNM,88772900 +Vanuatu,VUT,247262 +West Bank and Gaza,PSE,4046901 +World,WLD,7043902890 +Samoa,WSM,188889 +"Yemen, Rep.",YEM,23852409 +South Africa,ZAF,52274945 +"Congo, Dem. Rep.",COD,65705093 +Zambia,ZMB,14075099 +Zimbabwe,ZWE,13724317 +Taiwan,TWN,23373517 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/sources.csv b/data/sources.csv new file mode 100755 index 0000000..5934b91 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/sources.csv @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +http://www.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2014-data-platform +http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL +http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Taiwan \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/index.html b/index.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c402f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
+
+ +
+ + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/js/bootstrap.min.js b/js/bootstrap.min.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b04a0e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/bootstrap.min.js @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +/*! + * Bootstrap v3.1.1 (http://getbootstrap.com) + * Copyright 2011-2014 Twitter, Inc. + * Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE) + */ +if("undefined"==typeof jQuery)throw new Error("Bootstrap's JavaScript requires jQuery");+function(a){"use strict";function b(){var a=document.createElement("bootstrap"),b={WebkitTransition:"webkitTransitionEnd",MozTransition:"transitionend",OTransition:"oTransitionEnd otransitionend",transition:"transitionend"};for(var c in b)if(void 0!==a.style[c])return{end:b[c]};return!1}a.fn.emulateTransitionEnd=function(b){var c=!1,d=this;a(this).one(a.support.transition.end,function(){c=!0});var e=function(){c||a(d).trigger(a.support.transition.end)};return setTimeout(e,b),this},a(function(){a.support.transition=b()})}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";var b='[data-dismiss="alert"]',c=function(c){a(c).on("click",b,this.close)};c.prototype.close=function(b){function c(){f.trigger("closed.bs.alert").remove()}var d=a(this),e=d.attr("data-target");e||(e=d.attr("href"),e=e&&e.replace(/.*(?=#[^\s]*$)/,""));var f=a(e);b&&b.preventDefault(),f.length||(f=d.hasClass("alert")?d:d.parent()),f.trigger(b=a.Event("close.bs.alert")),b.isDefaultPrevented()||(f.removeClass("in"),a.support.transition&&f.hasClass("fade")?f.one(a.support.transition.end,c).emulateTransitionEnd(150):c())};var d=a.fn.alert;a.fn.alert=function(b){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.alert");e||d.data("bs.alert",e=new c(this)),"string"==typeof b&&e[b].call(d)})},a.fn.alert.Constructor=c,a.fn.alert.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.alert=d,this},a(document).on("click.bs.alert.data-api",b,c.prototype.close)}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";var b=function(c,d){this.$element=a(c),this.options=a.extend({},b.DEFAULTS,d),this.isLoading=!1};b.DEFAULTS={loadingText:"loading..."},b.prototype.setState=function(b){var c="disabled",d=this.$element,e=d.is("input")?"val":"html",f=d.data();b+="Text",f.resetText||d.data("resetText",d[e]()),d[e](f[b]||this.options[b]),setTimeout(a.proxy(function(){"loadingText"==b?(this.isLoading=!0,d.addClass(c).attr(c,c)):this.isLoading&&(this.isLoading=!1,d.removeClass(c).removeAttr(c))},this),0)},b.prototype.toggle=function(){var a=!0,b=this.$element.closest('[data-toggle="buttons"]');if(b.length){var c=this.$element.find("input");"radio"==c.prop("type")&&(c.prop("checked")&&this.$element.hasClass("active")?a=!1:b.find(".active").removeClass("active")),a&&c.prop("checked",!this.$element.hasClass("active")).trigger("change")}a&&this.$element.toggleClass("active")};var c=a.fn.button;a.fn.button=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.button"),f="object"==typeof c&&c;e||d.data("bs.button",e=new b(this,f)),"toggle"==c?e.toggle():c&&e.setState(c)})},a.fn.button.Constructor=b,a.fn.button.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.button=c,this},a(document).on("click.bs.button.data-api","[data-toggle^=button]",function(b){var c=a(b.target);c.hasClass("btn")||(c=c.closest(".btn")),c.button("toggle"),b.preventDefault()})}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";var b=function(b,c){this.$element=a(b),this.$indicators=this.$element.find(".carousel-indicators"),this.options=c,this.paused=this.sliding=this.interval=this.$active=this.$items=null,"hover"==this.options.pause&&this.$element.on("mouseenter",a.proxy(this.pause,this)).on("mouseleave",a.proxy(this.cycle,this))};b.DEFAULTS={interval:5e3,pause:"hover",wrap:!0},b.prototype.cycle=function(b){return b||(this.paused=!1),this.interval&&clearInterval(this.interval),this.options.interval&&!this.paused&&(this.interval=setInterval(a.proxy(this.next,this),this.options.interval)),this},b.prototype.getActiveIndex=function(){return this.$active=this.$element.find(".item.active"),this.$items=this.$active.parent().children(),this.$items.index(this.$active)},b.prototype.to=function(b){var c=this,d=this.getActiveIndex();return b>this.$items.length-1||0>b?void 0:this.sliding?this.$element.one("slid.bs.carousel",function(){c.to(b)}):d==b?this.pause().cycle():this.slide(b>d?"next":"prev",a(this.$items[b]))},b.prototype.pause=function(b){return b||(this.paused=!0),this.$element.find(".next, .prev").length&&a.support.transition&&(this.$element.trigger(a.support.transition.end),this.cycle(!0)),this.interval=clearInterval(this.interval),this},b.prototype.next=function(){return this.sliding?void 0:this.slide("next")},b.prototype.prev=function(){return this.sliding?void 0:this.slide("prev")},b.prototype.slide=function(b,c){var d=this.$element.find(".item.active"),e=c||d[b](),f=this.interval,g="next"==b?"left":"right",h="next"==b?"first":"last",i=this;if(!e.length){if(!this.options.wrap)return;e=this.$element.find(".item")[h]()}if(e.hasClass("active"))return this.sliding=!1;var j=a.Event("slide.bs.carousel",{relatedTarget:e[0],direction:g});return this.$element.trigger(j),j.isDefaultPrevented()?void 0:(this.sliding=!0,f&&this.pause(),this.$indicators.length&&(this.$indicators.find(".active").removeClass("active"),this.$element.one("slid.bs.carousel",function(){var b=a(i.$indicators.children()[i.getActiveIndex()]);b&&b.addClass("active")})),a.support.transition&&this.$element.hasClass("slide")?(e.addClass(b),e[0].offsetWidth,d.addClass(g),e.addClass(g),d.one(a.support.transition.end,function(){e.removeClass([b,g].join(" ")).addClass("active"),d.removeClass(["active",g].join(" ")),i.sliding=!1,setTimeout(function(){i.$element.trigger("slid.bs.carousel")},0)}).emulateTransitionEnd(1e3*d.css("transition-duration").slice(0,-1))):(d.removeClass("active"),e.addClass("active"),this.sliding=!1,this.$element.trigger("slid.bs.carousel")),f&&this.cycle(),this)};var c=a.fn.carousel;a.fn.carousel=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.carousel"),f=a.extend({},b.DEFAULTS,d.data(),"object"==typeof c&&c),g="string"==typeof c?c:f.slide;e||d.data("bs.carousel",e=new b(this,f)),"number"==typeof c?e.to(c):g?e[g]():f.interval&&e.pause().cycle()})},a.fn.carousel.Constructor=b,a.fn.carousel.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.carousel=c,this},a(document).on("click.bs.carousel.data-api","[data-slide], [data-slide-to]",function(b){var c,d=a(this),e=a(d.attr("data-target")||(c=d.attr("href"))&&c.replace(/.*(?=#[^\s]+$)/,"")),f=a.extend({},e.data(),d.data()),g=d.attr("data-slide-to");g&&(f.interval=!1),e.carousel(f),(g=d.attr("data-slide-to"))&&e.data("bs.carousel").to(g),b.preventDefault()}),a(window).on("load",function(){a('[data-ride="carousel"]').each(function(){var b=a(this);b.carousel(b.data())})})}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";var b=function(c,d){this.$element=a(c),this.options=a.extend({},b.DEFAULTS,d),this.transitioning=null,this.options.parent&&(this.$parent=a(this.options.parent)),this.options.toggle&&this.toggle()};b.DEFAULTS={toggle:!0},b.prototype.dimension=function(){var a=this.$element.hasClass("width");return a?"width":"height"},b.prototype.show=function(){if(!this.transitioning&&!this.$element.hasClass("in")){var b=a.Event("show.bs.collapse");if(this.$element.trigger(b),!b.isDefaultPrevented()){var c=this.$parent&&this.$parent.find("> .panel > .in");if(c&&c.length){var d=c.data("bs.collapse");if(d&&d.transitioning)return;c.collapse("hide"),d||c.data("bs.collapse",null)}var e=this.dimension();this.$element.removeClass("collapse").addClass("collapsing")[e](0),this.transitioning=1;var f=function(){this.$element.removeClass("collapsing").addClass("collapse in")[e]("auto"),this.transitioning=0,this.$element.trigger("shown.bs.collapse")};if(!a.support.transition)return f.call(this);var g=a.camelCase(["scroll",e].join("-"));this.$element.one(a.support.transition.end,a.proxy(f,this)).emulateTransitionEnd(350)[e](this.$element[0][g])}}},b.prototype.hide=function(){if(!this.transitioning&&this.$element.hasClass("in")){var b=a.Event("hide.bs.collapse");if(this.$element.trigger(b),!b.isDefaultPrevented()){var c=this.dimension();this.$element[c](this.$element[c]())[0].offsetHeight,this.$element.addClass("collapsing").removeClass("collapse").removeClass("in"),this.transitioning=1;var d=function(){this.transitioning=0,this.$element.trigger("hidden.bs.collapse").removeClass("collapsing").addClass("collapse")};return a.support.transition?void this.$element[c](0).one(a.support.transition.end,a.proxy(d,this)).emulateTransitionEnd(350):d.call(this)}}},b.prototype.toggle=function(){this[this.$element.hasClass("in")?"hide":"show"]()};var c=a.fn.collapse;a.fn.collapse=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.collapse"),f=a.extend({},b.DEFAULTS,d.data(),"object"==typeof c&&c);!e&&f.toggle&&"show"==c&&(c=!c),e||d.data("bs.collapse",e=new b(this,f)),"string"==typeof c&&e[c]()})},a.fn.collapse.Constructor=b,a.fn.collapse.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.collapse=c,this},a(document).on("click.bs.collapse.data-api","[data-toggle=collapse]",function(b){var c,d=a(this),e=d.attr("data-target")||b.preventDefault()||(c=d.attr("href"))&&c.replace(/.*(?=#[^\s]+$)/,""),f=a(e),g=f.data("bs.collapse"),h=g?"toggle":d.data(),i=d.attr("data-parent"),j=i&&a(i);g&&g.transitioning||(j&&j.find('[data-toggle=collapse][data-parent="'+i+'"]').not(d).addClass("collapsed"),d[f.hasClass("in")?"addClass":"removeClass"]("collapsed")),f.collapse(h)})}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";function b(b){a(d).remove(),a(e).each(function(){var d=c(a(this)),e={relatedTarget:this};d.hasClass("open")&&(d.trigger(b=a.Event("hide.bs.dropdown",e)),b.isDefaultPrevented()||d.removeClass("open").trigger("hidden.bs.dropdown",e))})}function c(b){var c=b.attr("data-target");c||(c=b.attr("href"),c=c&&/#[A-Za-z]/.test(c)&&c.replace(/.*(?=#[^\s]*$)/,""));var d=c&&a(c);return d&&d.length?d:b.parent()}var d=".dropdown-backdrop",e="[data-toggle=dropdown]",f=function(b){a(b).on("click.bs.dropdown",this.toggle)};f.prototype.toggle=function(d){var e=a(this);if(!e.is(".disabled, :disabled")){var f=c(e),g=f.hasClass("open");if(b(),!g){"ontouchstart"in document.documentElement&&!f.closest(".navbar-nav").length&&a(''}),b.prototype=a.extend({},a.fn.tooltip.Constructor.prototype),b.prototype.constructor=b,b.prototype.getDefaults=function(){return b.DEFAULTS},b.prototype.setContent=function(){var a=this.tip(),b=this.getTitle(),c=this.getContent();a.find(".popover-title")[this.options.html?"html":"text"](b),a.find(".popover-content")[this.options.html?"string"==typeof c?"html":"append":"text"](c),a.removeClass("fade top bottom left right in"),a.find(".popover-title").html()||a.find(".popover-title").hide()},b.prototype.hasContent=function(){return this.getTitle()||this.getContent()},b.prototype.getContent=function(){var a=this.$element,b=this.options;return a.attr("data-content")||("function"==typeof b.content?b.content.call(a[0]):b.content)},b.prototype.arrow=function(){return this.$arrow=this.$arrow||this.tip().find(".arrow")},b.prototype.tip=function(){return this.$tip||(this.$tip=a(this.options.template)),this.$tip};var c=a.fn.popover;a.fn.popover=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.popover"),f="object"==typeof c&&c;(e||"destroy"!=c)&&(e||d.data("bs.popover",e=new b(this,f)),"string"==typeof c&&e[c]())})},a.fn.popover.Constructor=b,a.fn.popover.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.popover=c,this}}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";function b(c,d){var e,f=a.proxy(this.process,this);this.$element=a(a(c).is("body")?window:c),this.$body=a("body"),this.$scrollElement=this.$element.on("scroll.bs.scroll-spy.data-api",f),this.options=a.extend({},b.DEFAULTS,d),this.selector=(this.options.target||(e=a(c).attr("href"))&&e.replace(/.*(?=#[^\s]+$)/,"")||"")+" .nav li > a",this.offsets=a([]),this.targets=a([]),this.activeTarget=null,this.refresh(),this.process()}b.DEFAULTS={offset:10},b.prototype.refresh=function(){var b=this.$element[0]==window?"offset":"position";this.offsets=a([]),this.targets=a([]);{var c=this;this.$body.find(this.selector).map(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("target")||d.attr("href"),f=/^#./.test(e)&&a(e);return f&&f.length&&f.is(":visible")&&[[f[b]().top+(!a.isWindow(c.$scrollElement.get(0))&&c.$scrollElement.scrollTop()),e]]||null}).sort(function(a,b){return a[0]-b[0]}).each(function(){c.offsets.push(this[0]),c.targets.push(this[1])})}},b.prototype.process=function(){var a,b=this.$scrollElement.scrollTop()+this.options.offset,c=this.$scrollElement[0].scrollHeight||this.$body[0].scrollHeight,d=c-this.$scrollElement.height(),e=this.offsets,f=this.targets,g=this.activeTarget;if(b>=d)return g!=(a=f.last()[0])&&this.activate(a);if(g&&b<=e[0])return g!=(a=f[0])&&this.activate(a);for(a=e.length;a--;)g!=f[a]&&b>=e[a]&&(!e[a+1]||b<=e[a+1])&&this.activate(f[a])},b.prototype.activate=function(b){this.activeTarget=b,a(this.selector).parentsUntil(this.options.target,".active").removeClass("active");var c=this.selector+'[data-target="'+b+'"],'+this.selector+'[href="'+b+'"]',d=a(c).parents("li").addClass("active");d.parent(".dropdown-menu").length&&(d=d.closest("li.dropdown").addClass("active")),d.trigger("activate.bs.scrollspy")};var c=a.fn.scrollspy;a.fn.scrollspy=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.scrollspy"),f="object"==typeof c&&c;e||d.data("bs.scrollspy",e=new b(this,f)),"string"==typeof c&&e[c]()})},a.fn.scrollspy.Constructor=b,a.fn.scrollspy.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.scrollspy=c,this},a(window).on("load",function(){a('[data-spy="scroll"]').each(function(){var b=a(this);b.scrollspy(b.data())})})}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";var b=function(b){this.element=a(b)};b.prototype.show=function(){var b=this.element,c=b.closest("ul:not(.dropdown-menu)"),d=b.data("target");if(d||(d=b.attr("href"),d=d&&d.replace(/.*(?=#[^\s]*$)/,"")),!b.parent("li").hasClass("active")){var e=c.find(".active:last a")[0],f=a.Event("show.bs.tab",{relatedTarget:e});if(b.trigger(f),!f.isDefaultPrevented()){var g=a(d);this.activate(b.parent("li"),c),this.activate(g,g.parent(),function(){b.trigger({type:"shown.bs.tab",relatedTarget:e})})}}},b.prototype.activate=function(b,c,d){function e(){f.removeClass("active").find("> .dropdown-menu > .active").removeClass("active"),b.addClass("active"),g?(b[0].offsetWidth,b.addClass("in")):b.removeClass("fade"),b.parent(".dropdown-menu")&&b.closest("li.dropdown").addClass("active"),d&&d()}var f=c.find("> .active"),g=d&&a.support.transition&&f.hasClass("fade");g?f.one(a.support.transition.end,e).emulateTransitionEnd(150):e(),f.removeClass("in")};var c=a.fn.tab;a.fn.tab=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.tab");e||d.data("bs.tab",e=new b(this)),"string"==typeof c&&e[c]()})},a.fn.tab.Constructor=b,a.fn.tab.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.tab=c,this},a(document).on("click.bs.tab.data-api",'[data-toggle="tab"], [data-toggle="pill"]',function(b){b.preventDefault(),a(this).tab("show")})}(jQuery),+function(a){"use strict";var b=function(c,d){this.options=a.extend({},b.DEFAULTS,d),this.$window=a(window).on("scroll.bs.affix.data-api",a.proxy(this.checkPosition,this)).on("click.bs.affix.data-api",a.proxy(this.checkPositionWithEventLoop,this)),this.$element=a(c),this.affixed=this.unpin=this.pinnedOffset=null,this.checkPosition()};b.RESET="affix affix-top affix-bottom",b.DEFAULTS={offset:0},b.prototype.getPinnedOffset=function(){if(this.pinnedOffset)return this.pinnedOffset;this.$element.removeClass(b.RESET).addClass("affix");var a=this.$window.scrollTop(),c=this.$element.offset();return this.pinnedOffset=c.top-a},b.prototype.checkPositionWithEventLoop=function(){setTimeout(a.proxy(this.checkPosition,this),1)},b.prototype.checkPosition=function(){if(this.$element.is(":visible")){var c=a(document).height(),d=this.$window.scrollTop(),e=this.$element.offset(),f=this.options.offset,g=f.top,h=f.bottom;"top"==this.affixed&&(e.top+=d),"object"!=typeof f&&(h=g=f),"function"==typeof g&&(g=f.top(this.$element)),"function"==typeof h&&(h=f.bottom(this.$element));var i=null!=this.unpin&&d+this.unpin<=e.top?!1:null!=h&&e.top+this.$element.height()>=c-h?"bottom":null!=g&&g>=d?"top":!1;if(this.affixed!==i){this.unpin&&this.$element.css("top","");var j="affix"+(i?"-"+i:""),k=a.Event(j+".bs.affix");this.$element.trigger(k),k.isDefaultPrevented()||(this.affixed=i,this.unpin="bottom"==i?this.getPinnedOffset():null,this.$element.removeClass(b.RESET).addClass(j).trigger(a.Event(j.replace("affix","affixed"))),"bottom"==i&&this.$element.offset({top:c-h-this.$element.height()}))}}};var c=a.fn.affix;a.fn.affix=function(c){return this.each(function(){var d=a(this),e=d.data("bs.affix"),f="object"==typeof c&&c;e||d.data("bs.affix",e=new b(this,f)),"string"==typeof c&&e[c]()})},a.fn.affix.Constructor=b,a.fn.affix.noConflict=function(){return a.fn.affix=c,this},a(window).on("load",function(){a('[data-spy="affix"]').each(function(){var b=a(this),c=b.data();c.offset=c.offset||{},c.offsetBottom&&(c.offset.bottom=c.offsetBottom),c.offsetTop&&(c.offset.top=c.offsetTop),b.affix(c)})})}(jQuery); \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/js/bubbles.js b/js/bubbles.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dbe5cda --- /dev/null +++ b/js/bubbles.js @@ -0,0 +1,467 @@ +var gBiggestFirst = true; //should largest circles be added first? +var gxScale, grScale, gcolorScale; +var gDefaultHeight = 400; +var gWidth = 800; +var gBubbleHeight = 70; +var gInitialPosition = gBubbleHeight; +var gMaxRadius = 20; +var gData = []; +var gRegions = {}; +var gIncomegroups = {}; +var gCurrentView = "global"; + +window.onload=function(){ + queue() + .defer(d3.csv, "data/gitr2014_nri.csv") + .defer(d3.csv, "data/population.csv") + .defer(d3.csv, "data/countries.csv") + .await(ready); +} + +function ready(error, gitr, population, countries) { + data = merge(gitr,population, countries); + gData = buildBubbleArray(data); + sortRegionsAndIncomegroups(); + showVisualisation(gData); + d3.selectAll("#toggles button[data-view]") + .datum(function(d) { return this.getAttribute("data-view"); }) + .on("click", transitionView); +} + +function showVisualisation(data){ + var svg = d3.select("svg");//.style("height", gDefaultHeight); + + var axes = svg.append("g") + .attr("id", "axes") + .attr("transform", "translate(0," + gInitialPosition + ")") + var bubbleLine = svg.append("g") + .attr("id", "bubbles") + .attr("transform", "translate(0," + gInitialPosition + ")") + + buildLines(axes); + showBubbles(data,bubbleLine); +} + +function sortRegionsAndIncomegroups(){ + var regions = d3.nest() + .key(function(d) { return d.properties.country.region; }) + .entries(gData) + .sort(sortByX); + + var incomegroups = d3.nest() + .key(function(d) { return d.properties.country.incomegroup; }) + .entries(gData) + .sort(sortByX); + + regions.forEach(function(level, index){ + gRegions[level.key] = index; + }); + + incomegroups.forEach(function(level, index){ + gIncomegroups[level.key] = index; + }); +} + +function sortByX(a,b){ + var aSum = 0, bSum = 0; + a.values.forEach(function(d){aSum+=d.x;}); + b.values.forEach(function(d){bSum+=d.x;}); + return bSum / b.values.length - aSum / a.values.length ; +} +function buildBubbleArray(data){ + var nri = data.metrics.NRI[2014]; + nri = nri.sort( + gBiggestFirst? + function(a,b){return b.country.population - a.country.population;} : + function(a,b){return a.country.population - b.country.population;} + ) + + var maxX = d3.max(nri, function(d) { return parseFloat(d.value); }); + var minX = d3.min(nri, function(d) { return parseFloat(d.value); }); + var maxR = d3.max(nri, function(d) { return parseInt(d.country.population); }); + var marginX = (maxX-minX)*0.02; + var padding = 2; //space in pixels between circles + + var xScale = d3.scale.linear() + .domain([minX-marginX,maxX+marginX]) + .range([0,gWidth]); + + var rScale = d3.scale.sqrt() + //make radius proportional to square root of data r + .domain([0,maxR]) + .range([1,gMaxRadius]); + + var colorScale = d3.scale.linear() + .domain([2, (maxX+2)/2, maxX]) + .range(["#d73027", "#ffffbf", "#1a9850"]); + + gxScale = xScale; + grScale = rScale; + gcolorScale = colorScale; + + var quadtree = d3.geom.quadtree() + .x(function(d) { return xScale(d.x); }) + .y(0) + .extent([[xScale(-1),0],[xScale(maxX)*1.2,0]]); + + // nriArray = buildBubbleArrays([{"key": "Overall", "values": nri}], quadtree)[0]; +// gNriPerRegion = buildBubbleArrays(regions, quadtree); +// gNriPerIncome = buildBubbleArrays(incomes, quadtree); +// gData = {"overall": nriArray, "region": gNriPerRegion, "income": gNriPerIncome}; + nriArray = buildBubbles(nri, quadtree); + return nriArray; +} + +function buildBubbles(data, quadtree){ + var result = []; + var padding = 2; //space in pixels between circles + var quadroot = quadtree([]); + var regionquadroots = {}; + var incomegroupquadroots = {}; + var bubbles = []; + data.forEach(function(item){ + var value = parseFloat(item.value) + var region = item.country.region; + var incomegroup = item.country.incomegroup; + if(!(region in regionquadroots)) regionquadroots[region] = quadtree([]); + if(!(incomegroup in incomegroupquadroots)) incomegroupquadroots[incomegroup] = quadtree([]); + + if(!isNaN(value)){ + var d = { + "x": value, + "r": parseInt(item.country.population), + "properties": item, + "cx": gxScale(value) + }; + var region_d = { "x": value, "r": parseInt(item.country.population) }; + var incomegroup_d = { "x": value, "r": parseInt(item.country.population)}; + + d["cy"] = calculateOffset(0, quadroot, gxScale, grScale, padding)(d); + d["region_cy"] = calculateOffset(0, regionquadroots[region], gxScale, grScale, padding)(region_d); + d["incomegroup_cy"] = calculateOffset(0, incomegroupquadroots[incomegroup], gxScale, grScale, padding)(incomegroup_d); + + bubbles.push(d); + quadroot.add(d); + regionquadroots[region].add(region_d); + incomegroupquadroots[incomegroup].add(incomegroup_d); + } + }); + return bubbles; +} + +function merge(gitr, pop, countriesInfo) { + var countries = {}; + var metrics = {}; + + pop.forEach(function(item){ + var code = item.Country_Code; + countries[code] = {"code": code, "name": item.Country_Name, "population": item.Population}; + }); + + countriesInfo.forEach(function(item){ + var code = item.Country_Code; + countries[code]["region"] = item.Region; + countries[code]["incomegroup"] = item.IncomeGroup; + + }) + + gitr.forEach(function(item){ + var code = item.Entity_code; + var year = item.Edition; + var metric = item.GLOBAL_ID; + + if(!(year in countries[code])){ + countries[code][year] = {}; + } + if(!(metric in metrics)){ + metrics[metric] = {"id": metric, "label": item.Series_with_units} + } + if(!(year in metrics[metric])){ + metrics[metric][year] = [] + } + + countries[code][year][metric] = { + "id": metric, + "value": item.Value, + "rank": item.Rank, + "country": countries[code], + "label": item.Series_with_units + } + metrics[metric][year].push(countries[code][year][metric]); + }); + + return {"countries": countries, "metrics": metrics}; +} + +function buildLines(axes){ + var nrRegions = Object.size(gRegions); + var nrIncomeGroups = Object.size(gIncomegroups); + var nrLines = Math.max(nrRegions, nrRegions); + + for(var i =0;i 0) value += 's'; else value += 'n'; // for now, always do n, looks better + if(x < gWidth/2) value += 'w'; else value += 'e'; + + return value; + }, + html: true, + title: function() { + var d = this.__data__, c = gcolorScale(parseFloat(d.x)); + return '
' + + '
Country
' + d.properties.country.name + '
' + + '
Population
' + d.properties.country.population + '
' + + '
Region
' + d.properties.country.region + '
' + + '
Income group
' + d.properties.country.incomegroup + '
' + + '
Value
' + d.x + '
' + + '
' + } + }) + + +} + +function transitionView(view){ + if(view == gCurrentView) + return; + var svg = d3.select("svg"); + var duration = 1000; + + var currentHeight = getSvgHeight(gCurrentView); + var height = getSvgHeight(view); + var heightDuration = height < currentHeight ? duration *2 : duration; + svg + .transition() + .duration(heightDuration) + .style("height", height + "px"); + + showLines(svg.select("#axes"), view); + circles = svg.selectAll("circle") + .data(gData) + .transition() + .duration(duration) + .delay(function(d){ return (6-d.x)*200}); + + if(view == "region"){ + circles.attr("cy", function(d){return (gRegions[d.properties.country.region]+1)*(gBubbleHeight) - gInitialPosition + d.region_cy }); + } + else if(view == "incomegroup"){ + circles.attr("cy", function(d){return (gIncomegroups[d.properties.country.incomegroup]+1)*(gBubbleHeight) - gInitialPosition + d.incomegroup_cy }); + } + else if(view == "global"){ + circles.attr("cy", function(d){return d.cy }); + } + + gCurrentView = view; +} + +function getSvgHeight(view){ + var nr = getNrBubbleCharts(view); + return (nr+1)*gBubbleHeight; +} + +Object.size = function(obj) { + var size = 0, key; + for (key in obj) { + if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) size++; + } + return size; +}; + + + + + + + + + +// Find the all nodes in the tree that overlap a given circle. +// quadroot is the root node of the tree, scaledX and scaledR +//are the position and dimensions of the circle on screen +//maxR is the (scaled) maximum radius of dots that have +//already been positioned. +//This will be most efficient if you add the circles +//starting with the smallest. +function findNeighbours(root, scaledX, scaledR, maxR, padding, xScale, rScale) { + + var neighbours = []; + //console.log("Neighbours of " + scaledX + ", radius " + scaledR); + + root.visit(function(node, x1, y1, x2, y2) { + //console.log("visiting (" + x1 + "," +x2+")"); + var p = node.point; + if (p) { //this node stores a data point value + var overlap, x2=xScale(p.x), r2=rScale(p.r); + if (x2 < scaledX) { + //the point is to the left of x + overlap = (x2+r2 + padding >= scaledX-scaledR); + /*console.log("left:" + x2 + ", radius " + r2 + (overlap?" overlap": " clear"));//*/ + } + else { + //the point is to the right + overlap = (scaledX + scaledR + padding >= x2-r2); + /*console.log("right:" + x2 + ", radius " + r2 + (overlap?" overlap": " clear"));//*/ + } + if (overlap) neighbours.push(p); + } + + return (x1-maxR > scaledX + scaledR + padding) + && (x2+maxR < scaledX - scaledR - padding) ; + //Returns true if none of the points in this + //section of the tree can overlap the point being + //compared; a true return value tells the `visit()` method + //not to bother searching the child sections of this tree + }); + + return neighbours; +} + +function calculateOffset(maxR, quadroot, xScale, rScale, padding){ + return function(d) { + neighbours = findNeighbours(quadroot, + xScale(d.x), + rScale(d.r), + maxR, padding, xScale, rScale); + var n=neighbours.length; + //console.log(j + " neighbours"); + var upperEnd = 0, lowerEnd = 0; + + if (n){ + //for every circle in the neighbour array + // calculate how much farther above + //or below this one has to be to not overlap; + //keep track of the max values + + var zeroPosValid = true; + + var j=n, occupied=new Array(n); + while (j--) { + var p = neighbours[j]; + var hypoteneuse = rScale(d.r)+rScale(p.r)+padding; + //length of line between center points, if only + // "padding" space in between circles + + var base = xScale(d.x) - xScale(p.x); + // horizontal offset between centres + + var vertical = Math.sqrt(Math.pow(hypoteneuse,2) - Math.pow(base, 2)); + //Pythagorean theorem + + occupied[j]=[p.offset+vertical,p.offset-vertical]; + //max and min of the zone occupied + //by this circle at x=xScale(d.x) + + var xAxisDistance = Math.sqrt(Math.pow(base,2)+Math.pow(p.offset,2)); + if(xAxisDistance <= hypoteneuse){ + zeroPosValid = false; + } + } + if(zeroPosValid){ + //console.log('x axis is fine for ' + d.properties.country.name + ' ' + d.r); + //return d.offset = 0; + } + + occupied = occupied.sort( + function(a,b){ + //return a[0] - b[0]; + return a[0] - b[0]; + }); + //sort by the max value of the occupied block + //console.log(occupied); + lowerEnd = upperEnd = 1/0;//infinity + + j=n; + while (j--){ + //working from the end of the "occupied" array, + //i.e. the circle with highest positive blocking + //value: + + if (lowerEnd > occupied[j][0]) { + //then there is space beyond this neighbour + //inside of all previous compared neighbours + upperEnd = Math.min(lowerEnd, occupied[j][0]); + lowerEnd = occupied[j][1]; + } + else { + lowerEnd = Math.min(lowerEnd, occupied[j][1]); + } + //console.log("at " + formatPercent(d.x) + ": " + // + upperEnd + "," + lowerEnd); + } + } + + //assign this circle the offset that is smaller + //in magnitude: + return d.offset = + (Math.abs(upperEnd)=r}function e(t,n){for(var a=n[0],r=n[1],e=!1,o=0,i=t.length,h=i-1;i>o;h=o++){var u=t[o],M=u[0],s=u[1],c=t[h],f=c[0],v=c[1];s>r^v>r&&(f-M)*(r-s)/(v-s)+M>a&&(e=!e)}return e}function o(t){return t?t/Math.sin(t):1}function i(t){return t>0?1:0>t?-1:0}function h(t){return t>1?va:-1>t?-va:Math.asin(t)}function u(t){return t>1?0:-1>t?fa:Math.acos(t)}function M(t){return t>0?Math.sqrt(t):0}function s(t){function n(t,n){var a=Math.cos(t),e=Math.cos(n),o=Math.sin(n),i=e*a,h=-((1-i?Math.log(.5*(1+i))/(1-i):-.5)+r/(1+i));return[h*e*Math.sin(t),h*o]}var a=Math.tan(.5*t),r=2*Math.log(Math.cos(.5*t))/(a*a);return n.invert=function(n,a){var e,o=Math.sqrt(n*n+a*a),i=t*-.5,u=50;if(!o)return[0,0];do{var M=.5*i,s=Math.cos(M),c=Math.sin(M),f=Math.tan(M),v=Math.log(1/s);i-=e=(2/f*v-r*f-o)/(-v/(c*c)+1-r/(2*s*s))}while(Math.abs(e)>sa&&--u>0);var l=Math.sin(i);return[Math.atan2(n*l,o*Math.cos(i)),h(a*l/o)]},n}function c(){var t=va,n=pa(s),a=n(t);return a.radius=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t=a*fa/180):t/fa*180},a}function f(t,n){var a=Math.cos(n),r=o(u(a*Math.cos(t/=2)));return[2*a*Math.sin(t)*r,Math.sin(n)*r]}function v(t){function n(t,n){var e=Math.cos(n),o=Math.cos(t/=2);return[(1+e)*Math.sin(t),i+Math.sin(n)*r-(1+e)*a*o]}var a=Math.sin(t),r=Math.cos(t),e=t>0?1:-1,o=Math.tan(e*t),i=(1+a-r)/2;return n.invert=function(t,n){var h=0,u=0,M=50;do{var s=Math.cos(h),c=Math.sin(h),f=Math.cos(u),v=Math.sin(u),l=1+f,g=l*c-t,d=i+v*r-l*a*s-n,b=.5*l*s,p=-c*v,w=.5*a*l*c,q=r*f+a*s*v,m=p*w-q*b,y=.5*(d*p-g*q)/m,S=(g*w-d*b)/m;h-=y,u-=S}while((Math.abs(y)>sa||Math.abs(S)>sa)&&--M>0);return e*u>-Math.atan2(Math.cos(h),o)-.001?[2*h,u]:null},n}function l(){function t(t){for(var n=[],e=a*(1-1e-6),o=a*(90-1e-6),i=-180*a;180>a*i;i+=o)n.push([i,o]);for(i-=o;a*(i-=e)>-180;)n.push([i,a*-Math.atan2(Math.cos(i*ga/2),r)*da]);return n.push(n[0]),t.clipPolygon([n])}var n=fa/9,a=n>0?1:-1,r=Math.tan(a*n),e=pa(v),o=e(n);return o.parallel=function(o){return arguments.length?(r=Math.tan((a=(n=o*fa/180)>0?1:-1)*n),t(e(n))):n/fa*180},t(o)}function g(t){return t=Math.exp(2*t),(t-1)/(t+1)}function d(t){return.5*(Math.exp(t)-Math.exp(-t))}function b(t){return.5*(Math.exp(t)+Math.exp(-t))}function p(t){return Math.log(t+M(t*t+1))}function w(t){return Math.log(t+M(t*t-1))}function q(t,n){var a=Math.tan(n/2),r=M(1-a*a),e=1+r*Math.cos(t/=2),o=Math.sin(t)*r/e,i=a/e,h=o*o,u=i*i;return[4/3*o*(3+h-3*u),4/3*i*(3+3*h-u)]}function m(t,n){var a=Math.abs(n);return fa/4>a?[t,Math.log(Math.tan(fa/4+n/2))]:[t*Math.cos(a)*(2*Math.SQRT2-1/Math.sin(a)),i(n)*(2*Math.SQRT2*(a-fa/4)-Math.log(Math.tan(a/2)))]}function y(t){function n(t,n){var r=qa(t,n);if(Math.abs(t)>va){var e=Math.atan2(r[1],r[0]),o=Math.sqrt(r[0]*r[0]+r[1]*r[1]),i=a*Math.round((e-va)/a)+va,u=Math.atan2(Math.sin(e-=i),2-Math.cos(e));e=i+h(fa/o*Math.sin(u))-u,r[0]=o*Math.cos(e),r[1]=o*Math.sin(e)}return r}var a=2*fa/t;return n.invert=function(t,n){var r=Math.sqrt(t*t+n*n);if(r>va){var e=Math.atan2(n,t),o=a*Math.round((e-va)/a)+va,i=e>o?-1:1,h=r*Math.cos(o-e),u=1/Math.tan(i*Math.acos((h-fa)/Math.sqrt(fa*(fa-2*h)+r*r)));e=o+2*Math.atan((u+i*Math.sqrt(u*u-3))/3),t=r*Math.cos(e),n=r*Math.sin(e)}return qa.invert(t,n)},n}function S(){var t=5,n=pa(y),a=n(t),r=a.stream,e=.01,o=-Math.cos(e*ga),i=Math.sin(e*ga);return a.lobes=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t=+a):t},a.stream=function(n){var u=a.rotate(),M=r(n),s=(a.rotate([0,0]),r(n));return a.rotate(u),M.sphere=function(){s.polygonStart(),s.lineStart();for(var n=0,a=360/t,r=2*fa/t,u=90-180/t,M=va;t>n;++n,u-=a,M-=r)s.point(Math.atan2(i*Math.cos(M),o)*da,h(i*Math.sin(M))*da),-90>u?(s.point(-90,-180-u-e),s.point(-90,-180-u+e)):(s.point(90,u+e),s.point(90,u-e));s.lineEnd(),s.polygonEnd()},M},a}function Q(t){return function(n){var a,r=t*Math.sin(n),e=30;do n-=a=(n+Math.sin(n)-r)/(1+Math.cos(n));while(Math.abs(a)>sa&&--e>0);return n/2}}function R(t,n,a){function r(a,r){return[t*a*Math.cos(r=e(r)),n*Math.sin(r)]}var e=Q(a);return r.invert=function(r,e){var o=h(e/n);return[r/(t*Math.cos(o)),h((2*o+Math.sin(2*o))/a)]},r}function T(t,n){var a=2.00276,r=ma(n);return[a*t/(1/Math.cos(n)+1.11072/Math.cos(r)),(n+Math.SQRT2*Math.sin(r))/a]}function x(t){var n=0,a=pa(t),r=a(n);return r.parallel=function(t){return arguments.length?a(n=t*fa/180):n/fa*180},r}function E(t,n){return[t*Math.cos(n),n]}function P(t){function n(n,r){var e=a+t-r,o=e?n*Math.cos(r)/e:e;return[e*Math.sin(o),a-e*Math.cos(o)]}if(!t)return E;var a=1/Math.tan(t);return n.invert=function(n,r){var e=Math.sqrt(n*n+(r=a-r)*r),o=a+t-e;return[e/Math.cos(o)*Math.atan2(n,r),o]},n}function k(t){function n(n,a){for(var r=Math.sin(a),e=Math.cos(a),o=new Array(3),M=0;3>M;++M){var s=t[M];if(o[M]=z(a-s[1],s[3],s[2],e,r,n-s[0]),!o[M][0])return s.point;o[M][1]=F(o[M][1]-s.v[1])}for(var c=u.slice(),M=0;3>M;++M){var f=2==M?0:M+1,v=B(t[M].v[0],o[M][0],o[f][0]);o[M][1]<0&&(v=-v),M?1==M?(v=i-v,c[0]-=o[M][0]*Math.cos(v),c[1]-=o[M][0]*Math.sin(v)):(v=h-v,c[0]+=o[M][0]*Math.cos(v),c[1]+=o[M][0]*Math.sin(v)):(c[0]+=o[M][0]*Math.cos(v),c[1]-=o[M][0]*Math.sin(v))}return c[0]/=3,c[1]/=3,c}t=t.map(function(t){return[t[0],t[1],Math.sin(t[1]),Math.cos(t[1])]});for(var a,r=t[2],e=0;3>e;++e,r=a)a=t[e],r.v=z(a[1]-r[1],r[3],r[2],a[3],a[2],a[0]-r[0]),r.point=[0,0];var o=B(t[0].v[0],t[2].v[0],t[1].v[0]),i=B(t[0].v[0],t[1].v[0],t[2].v[0]),h=fa-o;t[2].point[1]=0,t[0].point[0]=-(t[1].point[0]=.5*t[0].v[0]);var u=[t[2].point[0]=t[0].point[0]+t[2].v[0]*Math.cos(o),2*(t[0].point[1]=t[1].point[1]=t[2].v[0]*Math.sin(o))];return n}function _(){var t=[[0,0],[0,0],[0,0]],n=pa(k),a=n(t),r=a.rotate;return delete a.rotate,a.points=function(e){if(!arguments.length)return t;t=e;var o=d3.geo.centroid({type:"MultiPoint",coordinates:t}),i=[-o[0],-o[1]];return r.call(a,i),n(t.map(d3.geo.rotation(i)).map(A))},a.points([[-150,55],[-35,55],[-92.5,10]])}function z(t,n,a,r,e,o){var i,M=Math.cos(o);if(Math.abs(t)>1||Math.abs(o)>1)i=u(a*e+n*r*M);else{var s=Math.sin(.5*t),c=Math.sin(.5*o);i=2*h(Math.sqrt(s*s+n*r*c*c))}return Math.abs(i)>sa?[i,Math.atan2(r*Math.sin(o),n*e-a*r*M)]:[0,0]}function B(t,n,a){return u(.5*(t*t+n*n-a*a)/(t*n))}function F(t){return t-2*fa*Math.floor((t+fa)/(2*fa))}function A(t){return[t[0]*ga,t[1]*ga]}function G(t,n){var a=M(1-Math.sin(n));return[2/la*t*a,la*(1-a)]}function j(t){function n(t,n){return[t,(t?t/Math.sin(t):1)*(Math.sin(n)*Math.cos(t)-a*Math.cos(n))]}var a=Math.tan(t);return n.invert=a?function(t,n){t&&(n*=Math.sin(t)/t);var r=Math.cos(t);return[t,2*Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(r*r+a*a-n*n)-r,a-n)]}:function(t,n){return[t,h(t?n*Math.tan(t)/t:n)]},n}function C(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(3);return[a*t*(2*Math.cos(2*n/3)-1)/la,a*la*Math.sin(n/3)]}function D(t){function n(t,n){return[t*a,Math.sin(n)/a]}var a=Math.cos(t);return n.invert=function(t,n){return[t/a,h(n*a)]},n}function L(t){function n(t,n){return[t*a,(1+a)*Math.tan(.5*n)]}var a=Math.cos(t);return n.invert=function(t,n){return[t/a,2*Math.atan(n/(1+a))]},n}function O(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(8/(3*fa));return[a*t*(1-Math.abs(n)/fa),a*n]}function H(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(4-3*Math.sin(Math.abs(n)));return[2/Math.sqrt(6*fa)*t*a,i(n)*Math.sqrt(2*fa/3)*(2-a)]}function I(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(fa*(4+fa));return[2/a*t*(1+Math.sqrt(1-4*n*n/(fa*fa))),4/a*n]}function J(t,n){var a=(2+va)*Math.sin(n);n/=2;for(var r=0,e=1/0;10>r&&Math.abs(e)>sa;r++){var o=Math.cos(n);n-=e=(n+Math.sin(n)*(o+2)-a)/(2*o*(1+o))}return[2/Math.sqrt(fa*(4+fa))*t*(1+Math.cos(n)),2*Math.sqrt(fa/(4+fa))*Math.sin(n)]}function K(t,n){return[t*(1+Math.cos(n))/Math.sqrt(2+fa),2*n/Math.sqrt(2+fa)]}function N(t,n){for(var a=(1+va)*Math.sin(n),r=0,e=1/0;10>r&&Math.abs(e)>sa;r++)n-=e=(n+Math.sin(n)-a)/(1+Math.cos(n));return a=Math.sqrt(2+fa),[t*(1+Math.cos(n))/a,2*n/a]}function U(t,n){var a=Math.sin(t/=2),r=Math.cos(t),e=Math.sqrt(Math.cos(n)),o=Math.cos(n/=2),i=Math.sin(n)/(o+Math.SQRT2*r*e),h=Math.sqrt(2/(1+i*i)),u=Math.sqrt((Math.SQRT2*o+(r+a)*e)/(Math.SQRT2*o+(r-a)*e));return[Qa*(h*(u-1/u)-2*Math.log(u)),Qa*(h*i*(u+1/u)-2*Math.atan(i))]}function V(t,n){var a=Math.tan(n/2);return[t*Ra*M(1-a*a),(1+Ra)*a]}function W(t,n){var a=n/2,r=Math.cos(a);return[2*t/la*Math.cos(n)*r*r,la*Math.tan(a)]}function X(t,n,a,r,e,o,i,h){function u(u,M){if(!M)return[t*u/fa,0];var s=M*M,c=t+s*(n+s*(a+s*r)),f=M*(e-1+s*(o-h+s*i)),v=(c*c+f*f)/(2*f),l=u*Math.asin(c/v)/fa;return[v*Math.sin(l),M*(1+s*h)+v*(1-Math.cos(l))]}return arguments.length<8&&(h=0),u.invert=function(u,s){var c,f,v=fa*u/t,l=s,g=50;do{var d=l*l,b=t+d*(n+d*(a+d*r)),p=l*(e-1+d*(o-h+d*i)),w=b*b+p*p,q=2*p,m=w/q,y=m*m,S=Math.asin(b/m)/fa,Q=v*S;if(xB2=b*b,dxBdφ=(2*n+d*(4*a+6*d*r))*l,dyBdφ=e+d*(3*o+5*d*i),dpdφ=2*(b*dxBdφ+p*(dyBdφ-1)),dqdφ=2*(dyBdφ-1),dmdφ=(dpdφ*q-w*dqdφ)/(q*q),cosα=Math.cos(Q),sinα=Math.sin(Q),mcosα=m*cosα,msinα=m*sinα,dαdφ=v/fa*(1/M(1-xB2/y))*(dxBdφ*m-b*dmdφ)/y,fx=msinα-u,fy=l*(1+d*h)+m-mcosα-s,δxδφ=dmdφ*sinα+mcosα*dαdφ,δxδλ=mcosα*S,δyδφ=1+dmdφ-(dmdφ*cosα-msinα*dαdφ),δyδλ=msinα*S,denominator=δxδφ*δyδλ-δyδφ*δxδλ,!denominator)break;v-=c=(fy*δxδφ-fx*δyδφ)/denominator,l-=f=(fx*δyδλ-fy*δxδλ)/denominator}while((Math.abs(c)>sa||Math.abs(f)>sa)&&--g>0);return[v,l]},u}function Y(t,n){var a=t*t,r=n*n;return[t*(1-.162388*r)*(.87-952426e-9*a*a),n*(1+r/12)]}function Z(t){function n(){var t=!1,n=pa(a),r=n(t);return r.quincuncial=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t=!!a):t},r}function a(n){var a=n?function(n,a){var e=Math.abs(n)0?n-fa:n+fa,a),h=(o[0]-o[1])*Math.SQRT1_2,u=(o[0]+o[1])*Math.SQRT1_2;if(e)return[h,u];var M=r*Math.SQRT1_2,s=h>0^u>0?-1:1;return[s*h-i(u)*M,s*u-i(h)*M]}:function(n,a){var e=n>0?-.5:.5,o=t(n+e*fa,a);return o[0]-=e*r,o};return t.invert&&(a.invert=n?function(n,a){var e=(n+a)*Math.SQRT1_2,o=(a-n)*Math.SQRT1_2,i=Math.abs(e)<.5*r&&Math.abs(o)<.5*r;if(!i){var h=r*Math.SQRT1_2,u=e>0^o>0?-1:1,M=-u*(n+(o>0?1:-1)*h),s=-u*(a+(e>0?1:-1)*h);e=(-M-s)*Math.SQRT1_2,o=(M-s)*Math.SQRT1_2}var c=t.invert(e,o);return i||(c[0]+=e>0?fa:-fa),c}:function(n,a){var e=n>0?-.5:.5,o=t.invert(n+e*r,a),i=o[0]-e*fa;return-fa>i?i+=2*fa:i>fa&&(i-=2*fa),o[0]=i,o}),a}var r=t(va,0)[0]-t(-va,0)[0];return n.raw=a,n}function $(t,n){var a=i(t),r=i(n),e=Math.cos(n),o=Math.cos(t)*e,u=Math.sin(t)*e,M=Math.sin(r*n);t=Math.abs(Math.atan2(u,M)),n=h(o),Math.abs(t-va)>sa&&(t%=va);var s=tn(t>fa/4?va-t:t,n);return t>fa/4&&(M=s[0],s[0]=-s[1],s[1]=-M),s[0]*=a,s[1]*=-r,s}function tn(t,n){if(n===va)return[0,0];var a=Math.sin(n),r=a*a,e=r*r,o=1+e,i=1+3*e,u=1-e,s=h(1/Math.sqrt(o)),c=u+r*o*s,f=(1-a)/c,v=Math.sqrt(f),l=f*o,g=Math.sqrt(l),d=v*u;if(0===t)return[0,-(d+r*g)];var b=Math.cos(n),p=1/b,w=2*a*b,q=(-3*r+s*i)*w,m=(-c*b-(1-a)*q)/(c*c),y=.5*m/v,S=u*y-2*r*v*w,Q=r*o*m+f*i*w,R=-p*w,T=-p*Q,x=-2*p*S,E=4*t/fa;if(t>.222*fa||fa/4>n&&t>.175*fa){var P=(d+r*M(l*(1+e)-d*d))/(1+e);if(t>fa/4)return[P,P];var k=P,_=.5*P,z=50;P=.5*(_+k);do{var B=Math.sqrt(l-P*P),F=P*(x+R*B)+T*h(P/g)-E;if(!F)break;0>F?_=P:k=P,P=.5*(_+k)}while(Math.abs(k-_)>sa&&--z>0)}else{var A,P=sa,z=25;do{var G=P*P,B=M(l-G),j=x+R*B,F=P*j+T*h(P/g)-E,C=j+(T-R*G)/B;P-=A=B?F/C:0}while(Math.abs(A)>sa&&--z>0)}return[P,-d-r*M(l-P*P)]}function nn(t,n){for(var a=0,r=1,e=.5,o=50;;){var i=e*e,h=Math.sqrt(e),u=Math.asin(1/Math.sqrt(1+i)),M=1-i+e*(1+i)*u,s=(1-h)/M,c=Math.sqrt(s),f=s*(1+i),v=c*(1-i),l=f-t*t,g=Math.sqrt(l),d=n+v+e*g;if(Math.abs(r-a)0?a=e:r=e,e=.5*(a+r)}if(!o)return null;var b=Math.asin(h),p=Math.cos(b),w=1/p,q=2*h*p,m=(-3*e+u*(1+3*i))*q,y=(-M*p-(1-h)*m)/(M*M),S=.5*y/c,Q=(1-i)*S-2*e*c*q,R=-2*w*Q,T=-w*q,x=-w*(e*(1+i)*y+s*(1+3*i)*q);return[fa/4*(t*(R+T*g)+x*Math.asin(t/Math.sqrt(f))),b]}function an(t,n,a){if(!t){var r=rn(n,1-a);return[[0,r[0]/r[1]],[1/r[1],0],[r[2]/r[1],0]]}var e=rn(t,a);if(!n)return[[e[0],0],[e[1],0],[e[2],0]];var r=rn(n,1-a),o=r[1]*r[1]+a*e[0]*e[0]*r[0]*r[0];return[[e[0]*r[2]/o,e[1]*e[2]*r[0]*r[1]/o],[e[1]*r[1]/o,-e[0]*e[2]*r[0]*r[2]/o],[e[2]*r[1]*r[2]/o,-a*e[0]*e[1]*r[0]/o]]}function rn(t,n){var a,r,e,o,i;if(sa>n)return o=Math.sin(t),r=Math.cos(t),a=.25*n*(t-o*r),[o-a*r,r+a*o,1-.5*n*o*o,t-a];if(n>=1-sa)return a=.25*(1-n),r=b(t),o=g(t),e=1/r,i=r*d(t),[o+a*(i-t)/(r*r),e-a*o*e*(i-t),e+a*o*e*(i+t),2*Math.atan(Math.exp(t))-va+a*(i-t)/r];var u=[1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],s=[Math.sqrt(n),0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],c=0;for(r=Math.sqrt(1-n),i=1;Math.abs(s[c]/u[c])>sa&&8>c;)a=u[c++],s[c]=.5*(a-r),u[c]=.5*(a+r),r=M(a*r),i*=2;e=i*u[c]*t;do o=s[c]*Math.sin(r=e)/u[c],e=.5*(h(o)+e);while(--c);return[Math.sin(e),o=Math.cos(e),o/Math.cos(e-r),e]}function en(t,n,a){var r=Math.abs(t),e=Math.abs(n),o=d(e);if(r){var h=1/Math.sin(r),u=1/(Math.tan(r)*Math.tan(r)),s=-(u+a*o*o*h*h-1+a),c=(a-1)*u,f=.5*(-s+Math.sqrt(s*s-4*c));return[on(Math.atan(1/Math.sqrt(f)),a)*i(t),on(Math.atan(M((f/u-1)/a)),1-a)*i(n)]}return[0,on(Math.atan(o),1-a)*i(n)]}function on(t,n){if(!n)return t;if(1===n)return Math.log(Math.tan(t/2+fa/4));for(var a=1,r=Math.sqrt(1-n),e=Math.sqrt(n),o=0;Math.abs(e)>sa;o++){if(t%fa){var i=Math.atan(r*Math.tan(t)/a);0>i&&(i+=fa),t+=i+~~(t/fa)*fa}else t+=t;e=(a+r)/2,r=Math.sqrt(a*r),e=((a=e)-r)/2}return t/(Math.pow(2,o)*a)}function hn(t,n){var a=(Math.SQRT2-1)/(Math.SQRT2+1),r=Math.sqrt(1-a*a),e=on(va,r*r),o=-1,i=Math.log(Math.tan(fa/4+Math.abs(n)/2)),h=Math.exp(o*i)/Math.sqrt(a),u=un(h*Math.cos(o*t),h*Math.sin(o*t)),M=en(u[0],u[1],r*r);return[-M[1],(n>=0?1:-1)*(.5*e-M[0])]}function un(t,n){var a=t*t,r=n+1,e=1-a-n*n;return[.5*((t>=0?va:-va)-Math.atan2(e,2*t)),-.25*Math.log(e*e+4*a)+.5*Math.log(r*r+a)]}function Mn(t,n){var a=n[0]*n[0]+n[1]*n[1];return[(t[0]*n[0]+t[1]*n[1])/a,(t[1]*n[0]-t[0]*n[1])/a]}function sn(t){function n(t,n){var o=e(t,n);t=o[0],n=o[1];var i=Math.sin(n),h=Math.cos(n),M=Math.cos(t),s=u(a*i+r*h*M),c=Math.sin(s),f=Math.abs(c)>sa?s/c:1;return[f*r*Math.sin(t),(Math.abs(t)>va?f:-f)*(a*h-r*i*M)]}var a=Math.sin(t),r=Math.cos(t),e=cn(t);return e.invert=cn(-t),n.invert=function(t,n){var r=Math.sqrt(t*t+n*n),o=-Math.sin(r),i=Math.cos(r),h=r*i,u=-n*o,s=r*a,c=M(h*h+u*u-s*s),f=Math.atan2(h*s+u*c,u*s-h*c),v=(r>va?-1:1)*Math.atan2(t*o,r*Math.cos(f)*i+n*Math.sin(f)*o);return e.invert(v,f)},n}function cn(t){var n=Math.sin(t),a=Math.cos(t);return function(t,r){var e=Math.cos(r),o=Math.cos(t)*e,i=Math.sin(t)*e,u=Math.sin(r);return[Math.atan2(i,o*a-u*n),h(u*a+o*n)]}}function fn(){var t=0,n=pa(sn),a=n(t),r=a.rotate,e=a.stream,o=d3.geo.circle();return a.parallel=function(r){if(!arguments.length)return t/fa*180;var e=a.rotate();return n(t=r*fa/180).rotate(e)},a.rotate=function(n){return arguments.length?(r.call(a,[n[0],n[1]-t/fa*180]),o.origin([-n[0],-n[1]]),a):(n=r.call(a),n[1]+=t/fa*180,n)},a.stream=function(t){return t=e(t),t.sphere=function(){var n,a=.01,r=o.angle(90-a)().coordinates[0],e=r.length-1,i=-1;for(t.polygonStart(),t.lineStart();++i=0;)t.point((n=r[i])[0],n[1]);t.lineEnd(),t.polygonEnd()},t},a}function vn(t,n){function a(a,r){var e=ka(a/n,r);return e[0]*=t,e}return arguments.length<2&&(n=t),1===n?ka:1/0===n?gn:(a.invert=function(a,r){var e=ka.invert(a/t,r);return e[0]*=n,e},a)}function ln(){var t=2,n=pa(vn),a=n(t);return a.coefficient=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t=+a):t},a}function gn(t,n){return[t*Math.cos(n)/Math.cos(n/=2),2*Math.sin(n)]}function dn(t,n){for(var a,r=Math.sin(n)*(0>n?2.43763:2.67595),e=0;20>e&&(n-=a=(n+Math.sin(n)-r)/(1+Math.cos(n)),!(Math.abs(a)n?1.93052:1.75859)]}function bn(t){function n(n,s){var c,f=Math.abs(s);if(f>r){var v=Math.min(t-1,Math.max(0,Math.floor((n+fa)/M)));n+=fa*(t-1)/t-v*M,c=d3.geo.collignon.raw(n,f),c[0]=c[0]*e/o-e*(t-1)/(2*t)+v*e/t,c[1]=i+4*(c[1]-h)*u/e,0>s&&(c[1]=-c[1])}else c=a(n,s);return c[0]/=2,c}var a=d3.geo.cylindricalEqualArea.raw(0),r=_a*fa/180,e=2*fa,o=d3.geo.collignon.raw(fa,r)[0]-d3.geo.collignon.raw(-fa,r)[0],i=a(0,r)[1],h=d3.geo.collignon.raw(0,r)[1],u=d3.geo.collignon.raw(0,va)[1]-h,M=2*fa/t;return n.invert=function(n,r){n*=2;var s=Math.abs(r);if(s>i){var c=Math.min(t-1,Math.max(0,Math.floor((n+fa)/M)));n=(n+fa*(t-1)/t-c*M)*o/e;var f=d3.geo.collignon.raw.invert(n,.25*(s-i)*e/u+h);return f[0]-=fa*(t-1)/t-c*M,0>r&&(f[1]=-f[1]),f}return a.invert(n,r)},n}function pn(){function t(){var t=180/n;return{type:"Polygon",coordinates:[d3.range(-180,180+t/2,t).map(function(t,n){return[t,1&n?90-1e-6:_a]}).concat(d3.range(180,-180-t/2,-t).map(function(t,n){return[t,1&n?-90+1e-6:-_a]}))]}}var n=2,a=pa(bn),r=a(n),e=r.stream;return r.lobes=function(t){return arguments.length?a(n=+t):n},r.stream=function(n){var a=r.rotate(),o=e(n),i=(r.rotate([0,0]),e(n));return r.rotate(a),o.sphere=function(){d3.geo.stream(t(),i)},o},r}function wn(t){function n(n,e){var h,u,f=1-Math.sin(e);if(f&&2>f){var v,l=va-e,g=25;do{var d=Math.sin(l),b=Math.cos(l),p=o+Math.atan2(d,r-b),w=1+c-2*r*b;l-=v=(l-s*o-r*d+w*p-.5*f*a)/(2*r*d*p)}while(Math.abs(v)>ca&&--g>0);h=i*Math.sqrt(w),u=n*p/fa}else h=i*(t+f),u=n*o/fa;return[h*Math.sin(u),M-h*Math.cos(u)]}var a,r=1+t,e=Math.sin(1/r),o=h(e),i=2*Math.sqrt(fa/(a=fa+4*o*r)),M=.5*i*(r+Math.sqrt(t*(2+t))),s=t*t,c=r*r;return n.invert=function(t,n){var e=t*t+(n-=M)*n,f=(1+c-e/(i*i))/(2*r),v=u(f),l=Math.sin(v),g=o+Math.atan2(l,r-f);return[h(t/Math.sqrt(e))*fa/g,h(1-2*(v-s*o-r*l+(1+c-2*r*f)*g)/a)]},n}function qn(){var t=1,n=pa(wn),a=n(t);return a.ratio=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t=+a):t},a}function mn(t,n){return n>-za?(t=ya(t,n),t[1]+=Ba,t):E(t,n)}function yn(t,n){return Math.abs(n)>za?(t=ya(t,n),t[1]-=n>0?Ba:-Ba,t):E(t,n)}function Sn(t,n){return[3*t/(2*fa)*Math.sqrt(fa*fa/3-n*n),n]}function Qn(t){function n(n,a){if(Math.abs(Math.abs(a)-va)a?-2:2];var r=Math.sin(a),e=Math.pow((1+r)/(1-r),t/2),o=.5*(e+1/e)+Math.cos(n*=t);return[2*Math.sin(n)/o,(e-1/e)/o]}return n.invert=function(n,a){var r=Math.abs(a);if(Math.abs(r-2)2)return null;n/=2,a/=2;var e=n*n,o=a*a,u=2*a/(1+e+o);return u=Math.pow((1+u)/(1-u),1/t),[Math.atan2(2*n,1-e-o)/t,h((u-1)/(u+1))]},n}function Rn(){var t=.5,n=pa(Qn),a=n(t);return a.spacing=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t=+a):t},a}function Tn(t,n){return[t*(1+Math.sqrt(Math.cos(n)))/2,n/(Math.cos(n/2)*Math.cos(t/6))]}function xn(t,n){var a=t*t,r=n*n;return[t*(.975534+r*(-.119161+a*-.0143059+r*-.0547009)),n*(1.00384+a*(.0802894+r*-.02855+199025e-9*a)+r*(.0998909+r*-.0491032))]}function En(t,n){return[Math.sin(t)/Math.cos(n),Math.tan(n)*Math.cos(t)]}function Pn(t){function n(n,e){var o=e-t,i=Math.abs(o)=0;)s=t[M],c=s[0]+h*(e=c)-u*f,f=s[1]+h*f+u*e;return c=h*(e=c)-u*f,f=h*f+u*e,[c,f]}var a=t.length-1;return n.invert=function(n,r){var e=20,o=n,i=r;do{for(var u,M=a,s=t[M],c=s[0],f=s[1],v=0,l=0;--M>=0;)s=t[M],v=c+o*(u=v)-i*l,l=f+o*l+i*u,c=s[0]+o*(u=c)-i*f,f=s[1]+o*f+i*u;v=c+o*(u=v)-i*l,l=f+o*l+i*u,c=o*(u=c)-i*f-n,f=o*f+i*u-r;var g,d,b=v*v+l*l;o-=g=(c*v+f*l)/b,i-=d=(f*v-c*l)/b}while(Math.abs(g)+Math.abs(d)>sa*sa&&--e>0);if(e){var p=Math.sqrt(o*o+i*i),w=2*Math.atan(.5*p),q=Math.sin(w);return[Math.atan2(o*q,p*Math.cos(w)),p?h(i*q/p):0]}},n}function zn(){var t=Fa.miller,n=pa(_n),a=n(t);return a.coefficients=function(a){return arguments.length?n(t="string"==typeof a?Fa[a]:a):t},a}function Bn(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(6),r=Math.sqrt(7),e=Math.asin(7*Math.sin(n)/(3*a));return[a*t*(2*Math.cos(2*e/3)-1)/r,9*Math.sin(e/3)/r]}function Fn(t,n){for(var a,r=(1+Math.SQRT1_2)*Math.sin(n),e=n,o=0;25>o&&(e-=a=(Math.sin(e/2)+Math.sin(e)-r)/(.5*Math.cos(e/2)+Math.cos(e)),!(Math.abs(a)i&&(o-=a=(o/2+Math.sin(o)-e)/(.5+Math.cos(o)),!(Math.abs(a)sa&&--M>0);var v=n*(s=Math.tan(i)),l=Math.tan(Math.abs(r)0?va:-va)*(M+o*(c-h)/2+o*o*(c-2*M+h)/2)]}function On(t){function n(n,a){var r=Math.cos(a),e=(t-1)/(t-r*Math.cos(n));return[e*r*Math.sin(n),e*Math.sin(a)]}return n.invert=function(n,a){var r=n*n+a*a,e=Math.sqrt(r),o=(t-Math.sqrt(1-r*(t+1)/(t-1)))/((t-1)/e+e/(t-1));return[Math.atan2(n*o,e*Math.sqrt(1-o*o)),e?h(a*o/e):0]},n}function Hn(t,n){function a(n,a){var i=r(n,a),h=i[1],u=h*o/(t-1)+e;return[i[0]*e/u,h/u]}var r=On(t);if(!n)return r;var e=Math.cos(n),o=Math.sin(n);return a.invert=function(n,a){var i=(t-1)/(t-1-a*o);return r.invert(i*n,i*a*e)},a}function In(){var t=1.4,n=0,a=pa(Hn),r=a(t,n);return r.distance=function(r){return arguments.length?a(t=+r,n):t},r.tilt=function(r){return arguments.length?a(t,n=r*fa/180):180*n/fa},r}function Jn(t,n){var a=Math.tan(n/2),r=Math.sin(fa/4*a);return[t*(.74482-.34588*r*r),1.70711*a]}function Kn(t){function n(n,o){var i=u(Math.cos(o)*Math.cos(n-a)),h=u(Math.cos(o)*Math.cos(n-r)),s=0>o?-1:1;return i*=i,h*=h,[(i-h)/(2*t),s*M(4*e*h-(e-i+h)*(e-i+h))/(2*t)]}if(!t)return d3.geo.azimuthalEquidistant.raw;var a=-t/2,r=-a,e=t*t,o=Math.tan(r),i=.5/Math.sin(r);return n.invert=function(t,n){var e,h,M=n*n,s=Math.cos(Math.sqrt(M+(e=t+a)*e)),c=Math.cos(Math.sqrt(M+(e=t+r)*e));return[Math.atan2(h=s-c,e=(s+c)*o),(0>n?-1:1)*u(Math.sqrt(e*e+h*h)*i)]},n}function Nn(){var t=[[0,0],[0,0]],n=pa(Kn),a=n(0),r=a.rotate;return delete a.rotate,a.points=function(a){if(!arguments.length)return t;t=a;var e=d3.geo.interpolate(a[0],a[1]),o=e(.5),i=d3.geo.rotation([-o[0],-o[1]])(a[0]),u=.5*e.distance,M=(i[0]<0?-1:1)*i[1]*ga,s=h(Math.sin(M)/Math.sin(u));return r.call(i,[-o[0],-o[1],-s*da]),n(2*u)},a}function Un(t){function n(t,n){var r=d3.geo.gnomonic.raw(t,n);return r[0]*=a,r}var a=Math.cos(t);return n.invert=function(t,n){return d3.geo.gnomonic.raw.invert(t/a,n)},n}function Vn(){var t=[[0,0],[0,0]],n=pa(Un),a=n(0),r=a.rotate;return delete a.rotate,a.points=function(a){if(!arguments.length)return t;t=a;var e=d3.geo.interpolate(a[0],a[1]),o=e(.5),i=d3.geo.rotation([-o[0],-o[1]])(a[0]),u=.5*e.distance,M=(i[0]<0?-1:1)*i[1]*ga,s=h(Math.sin(M)/Math.sin(u));return r.call(i,[-o[0],-o[1],-s*da]),n(u)},a}function Wn(t,n){if(Math.abs(n)1?{type:"MultiPolygon",coordinates:t}:{type:"Polygon",coordinates:t[0]}:null}},Ma={Point:ia,MultiPoint:ia,LineString:ha,MultiLineString:ha,Polygon:ua,MultiPolygon:ua},sa=1e-6,ca=sa*sa,fa=Math.PI,va=fa/2,la=Math.sqrt(fa),ga=fa/180,da=180/fa,ba=d3.geo.projection,pa=d3.geo.projectionMutator;d3.geo.interrupt=function(t){function n(n,a){for(var r=0>a?-1:1,e=h[+(0>a)],o=0,i=e.length-1;i>o&&n>e[o][2][0];++o);var u=t(n-e[o][1][0],a);return u[0]+=t(e[o][1][0],r*a>r*e[o][0][1]?e[o][0][1]:a)[0],u}function a(){i=h.map(function(n){return n.map(function(n){var a,r=t(n[0][0],n[0][1])[0],e=t(n[2][0],n[2][1])[0],o=t(n[1][0],n[0][1])[1],i=t(n[1][0],n[1][1])[1];return o>i&&(a=o,o=i,i=a),[[r,o],[e,i]]})})}function r(){for(var t=1e-6,n=[],a=0,r=h[0].length;r>a;++a){var o=h[0][a],i=180*o[0][0]/fa,u=180*o[0][1]/fa,M=180*o[1][1]/fa,s=180*o[2][0]/fa,c=180*o[2][1]/fa;n.push(e([[i+t,u+t],[i+t,M-t],[s-t,M-t],[s-t,c+t]],30))}for(var a=h[1].length-1;a>=0;--a){var o=h[1][a],i=180*o[0][0]/fa,u=180*o[0][1]/fa,M=180*o[1][1]/fa,s=180*o[2][0]/fa,c=180*o[2][1]/fa;n.push(e([[s-t,c-t],[s-t,M+t],[i+t,M+t],[i+t,u-t]],30))}return{type:"Polygon",coordinates:[d3.merge(n)]}}function e(t,n){for(var a,r,e,o=-1,i=t.length,h=t[0],u=[];++oM;++M)u.push([h[0]+M*r,h[1]+M*e]);h=a}return u.push(a),u}function o(t,n){return Math.abs(t[0]-n[0])r)],u=h[+(0>r)],M=0,s=e.length;s>M;++M){var c=e[M];if(c[0][0]<=a&&afa*fa+sa)){var a=t,r=n,e=25;do{var o,i=Math.sin(a),h=Math.sin(a/2),M=Math.cos(a/2),s=Math.sin(r),c=Math.cos(r),f=Math.sin(2*r),v=s*s,l=c*c,g=h*h,d=1-l*M*M,b=d?u(c*M)*Math.sqrt(o=1/d):o=0,p=2*b*c*h-t,w=b*s-n,q=o*(l*g+b*c*M*v),m=o*(.5*i*f-2*b*s*h),y=.25*o*(f*h-b*s*l*i),S=o*(v*M+b*g*c),Q=m*y-S*q;if(!Q)break;var R=(w*m-p*S)/Q,T=(p*y-w*q)/Q;a-=R,r-=T}while((Math.abs(R)>sa||Math.abs(T)>sa)&&--e>0);return[a,r]}},(d3.geo.aitoff=function(){return ba(f)}).raw=f,(d3.geo.armadillo=l).raw=v,q.invert=function(t,n){if(t*=3/8,n*=3/8,!t&&Math.abs(n)>1)return null;var a=t*t,r=n*n,e=1+a+r,o=Math.sqrt(.5*(e-Math.sqrt(e*e-4*n*n))),u=h(o)/3,M=o?w(Math.abs(n/o))/3:p(Math.abs(t))/3,s=Math.cos(u),c=b(M),f=c*c-s*s;return[2*i(t)*Math.atan2(d(M)*s,.25-f),2*i(n)*Math.atan2(c*Math.sin(u),.25+f)]},(d3.geo.august=function(){return ba(q)}).raw=q;var wa=Math.log(1+Math.SQRT2);m.invert=function(t,n){if((r=Math.abs(n))ca&&--h>0);return[t/(Math.cos(o)*(e-1/Math.sin(o))),i(n)*o]},(d3.geo.baker=function(){return ba(m)}).raw=m;var qa=d3.geo.azimuthalEquidistant.raw;(d3.geo.berghaus=S).raw=y;var ma=Q(fa),ya=R(Math.SQRT2/va,Math.SQRT2,fa);(d3.geo.mollweide=function(){return ba(ya)}).raw=ya,T.invert=function(t,n){var a,r,e=2.00276,o=e*n,i=0>n?-fa/4:fa/4,h=25;do r=o-Math.SQRT2*Math.sin(i),i-=a=(Math.sin(2*i)+2*i-fa*Math.sin(r))/(2*Math.cos(2*i)+2+fa*Math.cos(r)*Math.SQRT2*Math.cos(i));while(Math.abs(a)>sa&&--h>0);return r=o-Math.SQRT2*Math.sin(i),[t*(1/Math.cos(r)+1.11072/Math.cos(i))/e,r]},(d3.geo.boggs=function(){return ba(T)}).raw=T,E.invert=function(t,n){return[t/Math.cos(n),n]},(d3.geo.sinusoidal=function(){return ba(E)}).raw=E,(d3.geo.bonne=function(){return x(P).parallel(45)}).raw=P;var Sa=R(1,4/fa,fa);(d3.geo.bromley=function(){return ba(Sa)}).raw=Sa,(d3.geo.chamberlin=_).raw=k,G.invert=function(t,n){var a=(a=n/la-1)*a;return[a>0?t*Math.sqrt(fa/a)/2:0,h(1-a)]},(d3.geo.collignon=function(){return ba(G)}).raw=G,(d3.geo.craig=function(){return x(j)}).raw=j,C.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(3),r=3*h(n/(a*la));return[la*t/(a*(2*Math.cos(2*r/3)-1)),r]},(d3.geo.craster=function(){return ba(C)}).raw=C,(d3.geo.cylindricalEqualArea=function(){return x(D)}).raw=D,(d3.geo.cylindricalStereographic=function(){return x(L)}).raw=L,O.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(8/(3*fa)),r=n/a;return[t/(a*(1-Math.abs(r)/fa)),r]},(d3.geo.eckert1=function(){return ba(O)}).raw=O,H.invert=function(t,n){var a=2-Math.abs(n)/Math.sqrt(2*fa/3);return[t*Math.sqrt(6*fa)/(2*a),i(n)*h((4-a*a)/3)]},(d3.geo.eckert2=function(){return ba(H)}).raw=H,I.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(fa*(4+fa))/2;return[t*a/(1+M(1-n*n*(4+fa)/(4*fa))),n*a/2]},(d3.geo.eckert3=function(){return ba(I)}).raw=I,J.invert=function(t,n){var a=.5*n*Math.sqrt((4+fa)/fa),r=h(a),e=Math.cos(r);return[t/(2/Math.sqrt(fa*(4+fa))*(1+e)),h((r+a*(e+2))/(2+va))]},(d3.geo.eckert4=function(){return ba(J)}).raw=J,K.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(2+fa),r=n*a/2; +return[a*t/(1+Math.cos(r)),r]},(d3.geo.eckert5=function(){return ba(K)}).raw=K,N.invert=function(t,n){var a=1+va,r=Math.sqrt(a/2);return[2*t*r/(1+Math.cos(n*=r)),h((n+Math.sin(n))/a)]},(d3.geo.eckert6=function(){return ba(N)}).raw=N,U.invert=function(t,n){var a=d3.geo.august.raw.invert(t/1.2,1.065*n);if(!a)return null;var r=a[0],e=a[1],o=20;t/=Qa,n/=Qa;do{var i=r/2,h=e/2,u=Math.sin(i),M=Math.cos(i),s=Math.sin(h),c=Math.cos(h),f=Math.cos(e),v=Math.sqrt(f),l=s/(c+Math.SQRT2*M*v),g=l*l,d=Math.sqrt(2/(1+g)),b=Math.SQRT2*c+(M+u)*v,p=Math.SQRT2*c+(M-u)*v,w=b/p,q=Math.sqrt(w),m=q-1/q,y=q+1/q,S=d*m-2*Math.log(q)-t,Q=d*l*y-2*Math.atan(l)-n,R=s&&Math.SQRT1_2*v*u*g/s,T=(Math.SQRT2*M*c+v)/(2*(c+Math.SQRT2*M*v)*(c+Math.SQRT2*M*v)*v),x=-.5*l*d*d*d,E=x*R,P=x*T,k=(k=2*c+Math.SQRT2*v*(M-u))*k*q,_=(Math.SQRT2*M*c*v+f)/k,z=-(Math.SQRT2*u*s)/(v*k),B=m*E-2*_/q+d*(_+_/w),F=m*P-2*z/q+d*(z+z/w),A=l*y*E-2*R/(1+g)+d*y*R+d*l*(_-_/w),G=l*y*P-2*T/(1+g)+d*y*T+d*l*(z-z/w),j=F*A-G*B;if(!j)break;var C=(Q*F-S*G)/j,D=(S*A-Q*B)/j;r-=C,e=Math.max(-va,Math.min(va,e-D))}while((Math.abs(C)>sa||Math.abs(D)>sa)&&--o>0);return Math.abs(Math.abs(e)-va)sa&&--o>0);o=50,t/=1-.162388*i;do{var h=(h=r*r)*h;r-=a=(r*(.87-952426e-9*h)-t)/(.87-.00476213*h)}while(Math.abs(a)>sa&&--o>0);return[r,e]},(d3.geo.ginzburg8=function(){return ba(Y)}).raw=Y;var Pa=X(2.6516,-.76534,.19123,-.047094,1.36289,-.13965,.031762);(d3.geo.ginzburg9=function(){return ba(Pa)}).raw=Pa,$.invert=function(t,n){var a=i(t),r=i(n),e=-a*t,o=-r*n,u=1>o/e,M=nn(u?o:e,u?e:o),s=M[0],c=M[1];u&&(s=-va-s);var f=Math.cos(c),t=Math.cos(s)*f,n=Math.sin(s)*f,v=Math.sin(c);return[a*(Math.atan2(n,-v)+fa),r*h(t)]},d3.geo.gringorten=Z($),hn.invert=function(t,n){var a=(Math.SQRT2-1)/(Math.SQRT2+1),r=Math.sqrt(1-a*a),e=on(va,r*r),o=-1,i=an(.5*e-n,-t,r*r),h=Mn(i[0],i[1]),u=Math.atan2(h[1],h[0])/o;return[u,2*Math.atan(Math.exp(.5/o*Math.log(a*h[0]*h[0]+a*h[1]*h[1])))-va]},d3.geo.guyou=Z(hn),(d3.geo.hammerRetroazimuthal=fn).raw=sn;var ka=d3.geo.azimuthalEqualArea.raw;gn.invert=function(t,n){var a=2*h(n/2);return[t*Math.cos(a/2)/Math.cos(a),a]},(d3.geo.hammer=ln).raw=vn,dn.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.abs(a=n*(0>n?.5179951515653813:.5686373742600607))>1-sa?a>0?va:-va:h(a);return[1.1764705882352942*t/Math.cos(a),Math.abs(a=((a+=a)+Math.sin(a))*(0>n?.4102345310814193:.3736990601468637))>1-sa?a>0?va:-va:h(a)]},(d3.geo.hatano=function(){return ba(dn)}).raw=dn;var _a=41+48/36+37/3600;(d3.geo.healpix=pn).raw=bn,(d3.geo.hill=qn).raw=wn;var za=.7109889596207567,Ba=.0528035274542;mn.invert=function(t,n){return n>-za?ya.invert(t,n-Ba):E.invert(t,n)},(d3.geo.sinuMollweide=function(){return ba(mn).rotate([-20,-55])}).raw=mn,yn.invert=function(t,n){return Math.abs(n)>za?ya.invert(t,n+(n>0?Ba:-Ba)):E.invert(t,n)},(d3.geo.homolosine=function(){return ba(yn)}).raw=yn,Sn.invert=function(t,n){return[2/3*fa*t/Math.sqrt(fa*fa/3-n*n),n]},(d3.geo.kavrayskiy7=function(){return ba(Sn)}).raw=Sn,(d3.geo.lagrange=Rn).raw=Qn,Tn.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.abs(t),r=Math.abs(n),e=fa/Math.SQRT2,o=sa,i=va;e>r?i*=r/e:o+=6*u(e/r);for(var h=0;25>h;h++){var s=Math.sin(i),c=M(Math.cos(i)),f=Math.sin(i/2),v=Math.cos(i/2),l=Math.sin(o/6),g=Math.cos(o/6),d=.5*o*(1+c)-a,b=i/(v*g)-r,p=c?-.25*o*s/c:0,w=.5*(1+c),q=(1+.5*i*f/v)/(v*g),m=i/v*(l/6)/(g*g),y=p*m-q*w,S=(d*m-b*w)/y,Q=(b*p-d*q)/y;if(i-=S,o-=Q,Math.abs(S)t?-o:o,0>n?-i:i]},(d3.geo.larrivee=function(){return ba(Tn)}).raw=Tn,xn.invert=function(t,n){var a=i(t)*fa,r=n/2,e=50;do{var o=a*a,h=r*r,u=a*r,M=a*(.975534+h*(-.119161+o*-.0143059+h*-.0547009))-t,s=r*(1.00384+o*(.0802894+h*-.02855+199025e-9*o)+h*(.0998909+h*-.0491032))-n,c=.975534-h*(.119161+3*o*.0143059+.0547009*h),f=-u*(.238322+.2188036*h+.0286118*o),v=u*(.1605788+7961e-7*o+-0.0571*h),l=1.00384+o*(.0802894+199025e-9*o)+h*(3*(.0998909-.02855*o)-.245516*h),g=f*v-l*c,d=(s*f-M*l)/g,b=(M*v-s*c)/g;a-=d,r-=b}while((Math.abs(d)>sa||Math.abs(b)>sa)&&--e>0);return e&&[a,r]},(d3.geo.laskowski=function(){return ba(xn)}).raw=xn,En.invert=function(t,n){var a=t*t,r=n*n,e=r+1,o=t?Math.SQRT1_2*Math.sqrt((e-Math.sqrt(a*a+2*a*(r-1)+e*e))/a+1):1/Math.sqrt(e);return[h(t*o),i(n)*u(o)]},(d3.geo.littrow=function(){return ba(En)}).raw=En,(d3.geo.loximuthal=function(){return x(Pn).parallel(40)}).raw=Pn,kn.invert=function(t,n){return[t,2.5*Math.atan(Math.exp(.8*n))-.625*fa]},(d3.geo.miller=function(){return ba(kn)}).raw=kn;var Fa={alaska:[[.9972523,0],[.0052513,-.0041175],[.0074606,.0048125],[-.0153783,-.1968253],[.0636871,-.1408027],[.3660976,-.2937382]],gs48:[[.98879,0],[0,0],[-.050909,0],[0,0],[.075528,0]],gs50:[[.984299,0],[.0211642,.0037608],[-.1036018,-.0575102],[-.0329095,-.0320119],[.0499471,.1223335],[.026046,.0899805],[7388e-7,-.1435792],[.0075848,-.1334108],[-.0216473,.0776645],[-.0225161,.0853673]],miller:[[.9245,0],[0,0],[.01943,0]],lee:[[.721316,0],[0,0],[-.00881625,-.00617325]]};(d3.geo.modifiedStereographic=zn).raw=_n,Bn.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(6),r=Math.sqrt(7),e=3*h(n*r/9);return[t*r/(a*(2*Math.cos(2*e/3)-1)),h(3*Math.sin(e)*a/7)]},(d3.geo.mtFlatPolarParabolic=function(){return ba(Bn)}).raw=Bn,Fn.invert=function(t,n){var a=n*Math.sqrt(2+Math.SQRT2)/(2*Math.sqrt(3)),r=2*h(a);return[3*Math.SQRT2*t/(1+2*Math.cos(r)/Math.cos(r/2)),h((a+Math.sin(r))/(1+Math.SQRT1_2))]},(d3.geo.mtFlatPolarQuartic=function(){return ba(Fn)}).raw=Fn,An.invert=function(t,n){var a=Math.sqrt(6/(4+fa)),r=n/a;return Math.abs(Math.abs(r)-va)r?-va:va),[1.5*t/(a*(.5+Math.cos(r))),h((r/2+Math.sin(r))/(1+fa/4))]},(d3.geo.mtFlatPolarSinusoidal=function(){return ba(An)}).raw=An,Gn.invert=function(t,n){var a,r=n,e=25;do{var o=r*r,i=o*o;r-=a=(r*(1.007226+o*(.015085+i*(-.044475+.028874*o-.005916*i)))-n)/(1.007226+o*(.045255+i*(-0.311325+.259866*o-.005916*11*i)))}while(Math.abs(a)>sa&&--e>0);return[t/(.8707+(o=r*r)*(-.131979+o*(-.013791+o*o*o*(.003971-.001529*o)))),r]},(d3.geo.naturalEarth=function(){return ba(Gn)}).raw=Gn,jn.invert=function(t,n){for(var a=n/2,r=0,e=1/0;10>r&&Math.abs(e)>sa;r++){var o=Math.cos(n/2);n-=e=(n-Math.tan(n/2)-a)/(1-.5/(o*o))}return[2*t/(1+Math.cos(n)),n]},(d3.geo.nellHammer=function(){return ba(jn)}).raw=jn;var Aa=Z(hn);(d3.geo.peirceQuincuncial=function(){return Aa().quincuncial(!0).rotate([-90,-90,45]).clipAngle(180-1e-6)}).raw=Aa.raw,Cn.invert=function(t,n){if(Math.abs(n)sa&&--o>0);return M=Math.tan(e),[(Math.abs(n)=0||1===o){r=(n>=0?5:-5)*(v+e);var l,g=50;do e=Math.min(18,Math.abs(r)/5),o=Math.floor(e),v=e-o,i=Ga[o][1],h=Ga[o+1][1],u=Ga[Math.min(19,o+2)][1],r-=(l=(n>=0?va:-va)*(h+v*(u-i)/2+v*v*(u-2*h+i)/2)-n)*da;while(Math.abs(l)>ca&&--g>0);break}}while(--o>=0);var d=Ga[o][0],b=Ga[o+1][0],p=Ga[Math.min(19,o+2)][0];return[t/(b+v*(p-d)/2+v*v*(p-2*b+d)/2),r*ga]},(d3.geo.robinson=function(){return ba(Ln)}).raw=Ln,(d3.geo.satellite=In).raw=Hn,Jn.invert=function(t,n){var a=n/1.70711,r=Math.sin(fa/4*a);return[t/(.74482-.34588*r*r),2*Math.atan(a)]},(d3.geo.times=function(){return ba(Jn)}).raw=Jn,(d3.geo.twoPointEquidistant=Nn).raw=Kn,(d3.geo.twoPointAzimuthal=Vn).raw=Un,Wn.invert=function(t,n){if(Math.abs(n)sa&&--h>0);return[i(t)*(Math.sqrt(r*r+4)+r)*fa/4,va*o]},(d3.geo.vanDerGrinten4=function(){return ba(Zn)}).raw=Zn;var ja=function(){var t=4*fa+3*Math.sqrt(3),n=2*Math.sqrt(2*fa*Math.sqrt(3)/t);return R(n*Math.sqrt(3)/fa,n,t/6)}();(d3.geo.wagner4=function(){return ba(ja)}).raw=ja,$n.invert=function(t,n){return[t/Math.sqrt(1-3*n*n/(fa*fa)),n]},(d3.geo.wagner6=function(){return ba($n)}).raw=$n,ta.invert=function(t,n){var a=t/2.66723,r=n/1.24104,e=Math.sqrt(a*a+r*r),o=2*h(e/2);return[3*Math.atan2(t*Math.tan(o),2.66723*e),e&&h(n*Math.sin(o)/(1.24104*.90631*e))]},(d3.geo.wagner7=function(){return ba(ta)}).raw=ta,na.invert=function(t,n){var a=-.5*(t*t+n*n),r=Math.sqrt(-a*(2+a)),e=n*a+t*r,o=t*a-n*r,i=Math.sqrt(o*o+e*e);return[Math.atan2(r*e,i*(1+a)),i?-h(r*o/i):0]},(d3.geo.wiechel=function(){return ba(na)}).raw=na,aa.invert=function(t,n){var a=t,r=n,e=25;do{var o,i=Math.cos(r),h=Math.sin(r),M=Math.sin(2*r),s=h*h,c=i*i,f=Math.sin(a),v=Math.cos(a/2),l=Math.sin(a/2),g=l*l,d=1-c*v*v,b=d?u(i*v)*Math.sqrt(o=1/d):o=0,p=.5*(2*b*i*l+a/va)-t,w=.5*(b*h+r)-n,q=.5*o*(c*g+b*i*v*s)+.5/va,m=o*(f*M/4-b*h*l),y=.125*o*(M*l-b*h*c*f),S=.5*o*(s*v+b*g*i)+.5,Q=m*y-S*q,R=(w*m-p*S)/Q,T=(p*y-w*q)/Q;a-=R,r-=T}while((Math.abs(R)>sa||Math.abs(T)>sa)&&--e>0);return[a,r]},(d3.geo.winkel3=function(){return ba(aa)}).raw=aa}(); \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/js/d3.geo.zoom.js b/js/d3.geo.zoom.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f4b8240 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/d3.geo.zoom.js @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +// Copyright (c) 2013, Jason Davies, http://www.jasondavies.com +// See LICENSE.txt for details. +(function() { + +var radians = Math.PI / 180, + degrees = 180 / Math.PI; + +// TODO make incremental rotate optional + +d3.geo.zoom = function() { + var projection, + zoomPoint, + event = d3.dispatch("zoomstart", "zoom", "zoomend"), + zoom = d3.behavior.zoom() + .on("zoomstart", function() { + var mouse0 = d3.mouse(this), + rotate = quaternionFromEuler(projection.rotate()), + point = position(projection, mouse0); + if (point) zoomPoint = point; + + zoomOn.call(zoom, "zoom", function() { + projection.scale(d3.event.scale); + var mouse1 = d3.mouse(this), + between = rotateBetween(zoomPoint, position(projection, mouse1)); + projection.rotate(eulerFromQuaternion(rotate = between + ? multiply(rotate, between) + : multiply(bank(projection, mouse0, mouse1), rotate))); + mouse0 = mouse1; + event.zoom.apply(this, arguments); + }); + event.zoomstart.apply(this, arguments); + }) + .on("zoomend", function() { + zoomOn.call(zoom, "zoom", null); + event.zoomend.apply(this, arguments); + }), + zoomOn = zoom.on; + + zoom.projection = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? zoom.scale((projection = _).scale()) : projection; + }; + + return d3.rebind(zoom, event, "on"); +}; + +function bank(projection, p0, p1) { + var t = projection.translate(), + angle = Math.atan2(p0[1] - t[1], p0[0] - t[0]) - Math.atan2(p1[1] - t[1], p1[0] - t[0]); + return [Math.cos(angle / 2), 0, 0, Math.sin(angle / 2)]; +} + +function position(projection, point) { + var t = projection.translate(), + spherical = projection.invert(point); + return spherical && isFinite(spherical[0]) && isFinite(spherical[1]) && cartesian(spherical); +} + +function quaternionFromEuler(euler) { + var λ = .5 * euler[0] * radians, + φ = .5 * euler[1] * radians, + γ = .5 * euler[2] * radians, + sinλ = Math.sin(λ), cosλ = Math.cos(λ), + sinφ = Math.sin(φ), cosφ = Math.cos(φ), + sinγ = Math.sin(γ), cosγ = Math.cos(γ); + return [ + cosλ * cosφ * cosγ + sinλ * sinφ * sinγ, + sinλ * cosφ * cosγ - cosλ * sinφ * sinγ, + cosλ * sinφ * cosγ + sinλ * cosφ * sinγ, + cosλ * cosφ * sinγ - sinλ * sinφ * cosγ + ]; +} + +function multiply(a, b) { + var a0 = a[0], a1 = a[1], a2 = a[2], a3 = a[3], + b0 = b[0], b1 = b[1], b2 = b[2], b3 = b[3]; + return [ + a0 * b0 - a1 * b1 - a2 * b2 - a3 * b3, + a0 * b1 + a1 * b0 + a2 * b3 - a3 * b2, + a0 * b2 - a1 * b3 + a2 * b0 + a3 * b1, + a0 * b3 + a1 * b2 - a2 * b1 + a3 * b0 + ]; +} + +function rotateBetween(a, b) { + if (!a || !b) return; + var axis = cross(a, b), + norm = Math.sqrt(dot(axis, axis)), + halfγ = .5 * Math.acos(Math.max(-1, Math.min(1, dot(a, b)))), + k = Math.sin(halfγ) / norm; + return norm && [Math.cos(halfγ), axis[2] * k, -axis[1] * k, axis[0] * k]; +} + +function eulerFromQuaternion(q) { + return [ + Math.atan2(2 * (q[0] * q[1] + q[2] * q[3]), 1 - 2 * (q[1] * q[1] + q[2] * q[2])) * degrees, + Math.asin(Math.max(-1, Math.min(1, 2 * (q[0] * q[2] - q[3] * q[1])))) * degrees, + Math.atan2(2 * (q[0] * q[3] + q[1] * q[2]), 1 - 2 * (q[2] * q[2] + q[3] * q[3])) * degrees + ]; +} + +function cartesian(spherical) { + var λ = spherical[0] * radians, + φ = spherical[1] * radians, + cosφ = Math.cos(φ); + return [ + cosφ * Math.cos(λ), + cosφ * Math.sin(λ), + Math.sin(φ) + ]; +} + +function dot(a, b) { + for (var i = 0, n = a.length, s = 0; i < n; ++i) s += a[i] * b[i]; + return s; +} + +function cross(a, b) { + return [ + a[1] * b[2] - a[2] * b[1], + a[2] * b[0] - a[0] * b[2], + a[0] * b[1] - a[1] * b[0] + ]; +} + +})(); diff --git a/js/d3.js b/js/d3.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a972735 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/d3.js @@ -0,0 +1,9255 @@ +!function() { + var d3 = { + version: "3.4.8" + }; + if (!Date.now) Date.now = function() { + return +new Date(); + }; + var d3_arraySlice = [].slice, d3_array = function(list) { + return d3_arraySlice.call(list); + }; + var d3_document = document, d3_documentElement = d3_document.documentElement, d3_window = window; + try { + d3_array(d3_documentElement.childNodes)[0].nodeType; + } catch (e) { + d3_array = function(list) { + var i = list.length, array = new Array(i); + while (i--) array[i] = list[i]; + return array; + }; + } + try { + d3_document.createElement("div").style.setProperty("opacity", 0, ""); + } catch (error) { + var d3_element_prototype = d3_window.Element.prototype, d3_element_setAttribute = d3_element_prototype.setAttribute, d3_element_setAttributeNS = d3_element_prototype.setAttributeNS, d3_style_prototype = d3_window.CSSStyleDeclaration.prototype, d3_style_setProperty = d3_style_prototype.setProperty; + d3_element_prototype.setAttribute = function(name, value) { + d3_element_setAttribute.call(this, name, value + ""); + }; + d3_element_prototype.setAttributeNS = function(space, local, value) { + d3_element_setAttributeNS.call(this, space, local, value + ""); + }; + d3_style_prototype.setProperty = function(name, value, priority) { + d3_style_setProperty.call(this, name, value + "", priority); + }; + } + d3.ascending = d3_ascending; + function d3_ascending(a, b) { + return a < b ? -1 : a > b ? 1 : a >= b ? 0 : NaN; + } + d3.descending = function(a, b) { + return b < a ? -1 : b > a ? 1 : b >= a ? 0 : NaN; + }; + d3.min = function(array, f) { + var i = -1, n = array.length, a, b; + if (arguments.length === 1) { + while (++i < n && !((a = array[i]) != null && a <= a)) a = undefined; + while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null && a > b) a = b; + } else { + while (++i < n && !((a = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && a <= a)) a = undefined; + while (++i < n) if ((b = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && a > b) a = b; + } + return a; + }; + d3.max = function(array, f) { + var i = -1, n = array.length, a, b; + if (arguments.length === 1) { + while (++i < n && !((a = array[i]) != null && a <= a)) a = undefined; + while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null && b > a) a = b; + } else { + while (++i < n && !((a = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && a <= a)) a = undefined; + while (++i < n) if ((b = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && b > a) a = b; + } + return a; + }; + d3.extent = function(array, f) { + var i = -1, n = array.length, a, b, c; + if (arguments.length === 1) { + while (++i < n && !((a = c = array[i]) != null && a <= a)) a = c = undefined; + while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null) { + if (a > b) a = b; + if (c < b) c = b; + } + } else { + while (++i < n && !((a = c = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && a <= a)) a = undefined; + while (++i < n) if ((b = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null) { + if (a > b) a = b; + if (c < b) c = b; + } + } + return [ a, c ]; + }; + d3.sum = function(array, f) { + var s = 0, n = array.length, a, i = -1; + if (arguments.length === 1) { + while (++i < n) if (!isNaN(a = +array[i])) s += a; + } else { + while (++i < n) if (!isNaN(a = +f.call(array, array[i], i))) s += a; + } + return s; + }; + function d3_number(x) { + return x != null && !isNaN(x); + } + d3.mean = function(array, f) { + var s = 0, n = array.length, a, i = -1, j = n; + if (arguments.length === 1) { + while (++i < n) if (d3_number(a = array[i])) s += a; else --j; + } else { + while (++i < n) if (d3_number(a = f.call(array, array[i], i))) s += a; else --j; + } + return j ? s / j : undefined; + }; + d3.quantile = function(values, p) { + var H = (values.length - 1) * p + 1, h = Math.floor(H), v = +values[h - 1], e = H - h; + return e ? v + e * (values[h] - v) : v; + }; + d3.median = function(array, f) { + if (arguments.length > 1) array = array.map(f); + array = array.filter(d3_number); + return array.length ? d3.quantile(array.sort(d3_ascending), .5) : undefined; + }; + function d3_bisector(compare) { + return { + left: function(a, x, lo, hi) { + if (arguments.length < 3) lo = 0; + if (arguments.length < 4) hi = a.length; + while (lo < hi) { + var mid = lo + hi >>> 1; + if (compare(a[mid], x) < 0) lo = mid + 1; else hi = mid; + } + return lo; + }, + right: function(a, x, lo, hi) { + if (arguments.length < 3) lo = 0; + if (arguments.length < 4) hi = a.length; + while (lo < hi) { + var mid = lo + hi >>> 1; + if (compare(a[mid], x) > 0) hi = mid; else lo = mid + 1; + } + return lo; + } + }; + } + var d3_bisect = d3_bisector(d3_ascending); + d3.bisectLeft = d3_bisect.left; + d3.bisect = d3.bisectRight = d3_bisect.right; + d3.bisector = function(f) { + return d3_bisector(f.length === 1 ? function(d, x) { + return d3_ascending(f(d), x); + } : f); + }; + d3.shuffle = function(array) { + var m = array.length, t, i; + while (m) { + i = Math.random() * m-- | 0; + t = array[m], array[m] = array[i], array[i] = t; + } + return array; + }; + d3.permute = function(array, indexes) { + var i = indexes.length, permutes = new Array(i); + while (i--) permutes[i] = array[indexes[i]]; + return permutes; + }; + d3.pairs = function(array) { + var i = 0, n = array.length - 1, p0, p1 = array[0], pairs = new Array(n < 0 ? 0 : n); + while (i < n) pairs[i] = [ p0 = p1, p1 = array[++i] ]; + return pairs; + }; + d3.zip = function() { + if (!(n = arguments.length)) return []; + for (var i = -1, m = d3.min(arguments, d3_zipLength), zips = new Array(m); ++i < m; ) { + for (var j = -1, n, zip = zips[i] = new Array(n); ++j < n; ) { + zip[j] = arguments[j][i]; + } + } + return zips; + }; + function d3_zipLength(d) { + return d.length; + } + d3.transpose = function(matrix) { + return d3.zip.apply(d3, matrix); + }; + d3.keys = function(map) { + var keys = []; + for (var key in map) keys.push(key); + return keys; + }; + d3.values = function(map) { + var values = []; + for (var key in map) values.push(map[key]); + return values; + }; + d3.entries = function(map) { + var entries = []; + for (var key in map) entries.push({ + key: key, + value: map[key] + }); + return entries; + }; + d3.merge = function(arrays) { + var n = arrays.length, m, i = -1, j = 0, merged, array; + while (++i < n) j += arrays[i].length; + merged = new Array(j); + while (--n >= 0) { + array = arrays[n]; + m = array.length; + while (--m >= 0) { + merged[--j] = array[m]; + } + } + return merged; + }; + var abs = Math.abs; + d3.range = function(start, stop, step) { + if (arguments.length < 3) { + step = 1; + if (arguments.length < 2) { + stop = start; + start = 0; + } + } + if ((stop - start) / step === Infinity) throw new Error("infinite range"); + var range = [], k = d3_range_integerScale(abs(step)), i = -1, j; + start *= k, stop *= k, step *= k; + if (step < 0) while ((j = start + step * ++i) > stop) range.push(j / k); else while ((j = start + step * ++i) < stop) range.push(j / k); + return range; + }; + function d3_range_integerScale(x) { + var k = 1; + while (x * k % 1) k *= 10; + return k; + } + function d3_class(ctor, properties) { + try { + for (var key in properties) { + Object.defineProperty(ctor.prototype, key, { + value: properties[key], + enumerable: false + }); + } + } catch (e) { + ctor.prototype = properties; + } + } + d3.map = function(object) { + var map = new d3_Map(); + if (object instanceof d3_Map) object.forEach(function(key, value) { + map.set(key, value); + }); else for (var key in object) map.set(key, object[key]); + return map; + }; + function d3_Map() {} + d3_class(d3_Map, { + has: d3_map_has, + get: function(key) { + return this[d3_map_prefix + key]; + }, + set: function(key, value) { + return this[d3_map_prefix + key] = value; + }, + remove: d3_map_remove, + keys: d3_map_keys, + values: function() { + var values = []; + this.forEach(function(key, value) { + values.push(value); + }); + return values; + }, + entries: function() { + var entries = []; + this.forEach(function(key, value) { + entries.push({ + key: key, + value: value + }); + }); + return entries; + }, + size: d3_map_size, + empty: d3_map_empty, + forEach: function(f) { + for (var key in this) if (key.charCodeAt(0) === d3_map_prefixCode) f.call(this, key.substring(1), this[key]); + } + }); + var d3_map_prefix = "\x00", d3_map_prefixCode = d3_map_prefix.charCodeAt(0); + function d3_map_has(key) { + return d3_map_prefix + key in this; + } + function d3_map_remove(key) { + key = d3_map_prefix + key; + return key in this && delete this[key]; + } + function d3_map_keys() { + var keys = []; + this.forEach(function(key) { + keys.push(key); + }); + return keys; + } + function d3_map_size() { + var size = 0; + for (var key in this) if (key.charCodeAt(0) === d3_map_prefixCode) ++size; + return size; + } + function d3_map_empty() { + for (var key in this) if (key.charCodeAt(0) === d3_map_prefixCode) return false; + return true; + } + d3.nest = function() { + var nest = {}, keys = [], sortKeys = [], sortValues, rollup; + function map(mapType, array, depth) { + if (depth >= keys.length) return rollup ? rollup.call(nest, array) : sortValues ? array.sort(sortValues) : array; + var i = -1, n = array.length, key = keys[depth++], keyValue, object, setter, valuesByKey = new d3_Map(), values; + while (++i < n) { + if (values = valuesByKey.get(keyValue = key(object = array[i]))) { + values.push(object); + } else { + valuesByKey.set(keyValue, [ object ]); + } + } + if (mapType) { + object = mapType(); + setter = function(keyValue, values) { + object.set(keyValue, map(mapType, values, depth)); + }; + } else { + object = {}; + setter = function(keyValue, values) { + object[keyValue] = map(mapType, values, depth); + }; + } + valuesByKey.forEach(setter); + return object; + } + function entries(map, depth) { + if (depth >= keys.length) return map; + var array = [], sortKey = sortKeys[depth++]; + map.forEach(function(key, keyMap) { + array.push({ + key: key, + values: entries(keyMap, depth) + }); + }); + return sortKey ? array.sort(function(a, b) { + return sortKey(a.key, b.key); + }) : array; + } + nest.map = function(array, mapType) { + return map(mapType, array, 0); + }; + nest.entries = function(array) { + return entries(map(d3.map, array, 0), 0); + }; + nest.key = function(d) { + keys.push(d); + return nest; + }; + nest.sortKeys = function(order) { + sortKeys[keys.length - 1] = order; + return nest; + }; + nest.sortValues = function(order) { + sortValues = order; + return nest; + }; + nest.rollup = function(f) { + rollup = f; + return nest; + }; + return nest; + }; + d3.set = function(array) { + var set = new d3_Set(); + if (array) for (var i = 0, n = array.length; i < n; ++i) set.add(array[i]); + return set; + }; + function d3_Set() {} + d3_class(d3_Set, { + has: d3_map_has, + add: function(value) { + this[d3_map_prefix + value] = true; + return value; + }, + remove: function(value) { + value = d3_map_prefix + value; + return value in this && delete this[value]; + }, + values: d3_map_keys, + size: d3_map_size, + empty: d3_map_empty, + forEach: function(f) { + for (var value in this) if (value.charCodeAt(0) === d3_map_prefixCode) f.call(this, value.substring(1)); + } + }); + d3.behavior = {}; + d3.rebind = function(target, source) { + var i = 1, n = arguments.length, method; + while (++i < n) target[method = arguments[i]] = d3_rebind(target, source, source[method]); + return target; + }; + function d3_rebind(target, source, method) { + return function() { + var value = method.apply(source, arguments); + return value === source ? target : value; + }; + } + function d3_vendorSymbol(object, name) { + if (name in object) return name; + name = name.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + name.substring(1); + for (var i = 0, n = d3_vendorPrefixes.length; i < n; ++i) { + var prefixName = d3_vendorPrefixes[i] + name; + if (prefixName in object) return prefixName; + } + } + var d3_vendorPrefixes = [ "webkit", "ms", "moz", "Moz", "o", "O" ]; + function d3_noop() {} + d3.dispatch = function() { + var dispatch = new d3_dispatch(), i = -1, n = arguments.length; + while (++i < n) dispatch[arguments[i]] = d3_dispatch_event(dispatch); + return dispatch; + }; + function d3_dispatch() {} + d3_dispatch.prototype.on = function(type, listener) { + var i = type.indexOf("."), name = ""; + if (i >= 0) { + name = type.substring(i + 1); + type = type.substring(0, i); + } + if (type) return arguments.length < 2 ? this[type].on(name) : this[type].on(name, listener); + if (arguments.length === 2) { + if (listener == null) for (type in this) { + if (this.hasOwnProperty(type)) this[type].on(name, null); + } + return this; + } + }; + function d3_dispatch_event(dispatch) { + var listeners = [], listenerByName = new d3_Map(); + function event() { + var z = listeners, i = -1, n = z.length, l; + while (++i < n) if (l = z[i].on) l.apply(this, arguments); + return dispatch; + } + event.on = function(name, listener) { + var l = listenerByName.get(name), i; + if (arguments.length < 2) return l && l.on; + if (l) { + l.on = null; + listeners = listeners.slice(0, i = listeners.indexOf(l)).concat(listeners.slice(i + 1)); + listenerByName.remove(name); + } + if (listener) listeners.push(listenerByName.set(name, { + on: listener + })); + return dispatch; + }; + return event; + } + d3.event = null; + function d3_eventPreventDefault() { + d3.event.preventDefault(); + } + function d3_eventSource() { + var e = d3.event, s; + while (s = e.sourceEvent) e = s; + return e; + } + function d3_eventDispatch(target) { + var dispatch = new d3_dispatch(), i = 0, n = arguments.length; + while (++i < n) dispatch[arguments[i]] = d3_dispatch_event(dispatch); + dispatch.of = function(thiz, argumentz) { + return function(e1) { + try { + var e0 = e1.sourceEvent = d3.event; + e1.target = target; + d3.event = e1; + dispatch[e1.type].apply(thiz, argumentz); + } finally { + d3.event = e0; + } + }; + }; + return dispatch; + } + d3.requote = function(s) { + return s.replace(d3_requote_re, "\\$&"); + }; + var d3_requote_re = /[\\\^\$\*\+\?\|\[\]\(\)\.\{\}]/g; + var d3_subclass = {}.__proto__ ? function(object, prototype) { + object.__proto__ = prototype; + } : function(object, prototype) { + for (var property in prototype) object[property] = prototype[property]; + }; + function d3_selection(groups) { + d3_subclass(groups, d3_selectionPrototype); + return groups; + } + var d3_select = function(s, n) { + return n.querySelector(s); + }, d3_selectAll = function(s, n) { + return n.querySelectorAll(s); + }, d3_selectMatcher = d3_documentElement[d3_vendorSymbol(d3_documentElement, "matchesSelector")], d3_selectMatches = function(n, s) { + return d3_selectMatcher.call(n, s); + }; + if (typeof Sizzle === "function") { + d3_select = function(s, n) { + return Sizzle(s, n)[0] || null; + }; + d3_selectAll = Sizzle; + d3_selectMatches = Sizzle.matchesSelector; + } + d3.selection = function() { + return d3_selectionRoot; + }; + var d3_selectionPrototype = d3.selection.prototype = []; + d3_selectionPrototype.select = function(selector) { + var subgroups = [], subgroup, subnode, group, node; + selector = d3_selection_selector(selector); + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + subgroup.parentNode = (group = this[j]).parentNode; + for (var i = -1, n = group.length; ++i < n; ) { + if (node = group[i]) { + subgroup.push(subnode = selector.call(node, node.__data__, i, j)); + if (subnode && "__data__" in node) subnode.__data__ = node.__data__; + } else { + subgroup.push(null); + } + } + } + return d3_selection(subgroups); + }; + function d3_selection_selector(selector) { + return typeof selector === "function" ? selector : function() { + return d3_select(selector, this); + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.selectAll = function(selector) { + var subgroups = [], subgroup, node; + selector = d3_selection_selectorAll(selector); + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + for (var group = this[j], i = -1, n = group.length; ++i < n; ) { + if (node = group[i]) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = d3_array(selector.call(node, node.__data__, i, j))); + subgroup.parentNode = node; + } + } + } + return d3_selection(subgroups); + }; + function d3_selection_selectorAll(selector) { + return typeof selector === "function" ? selector : function() { + return d3_selectAll(selector, this); + }; + } + var d3_nsPrefix = { + svg: "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg", + xhtml: "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml", + xlink: "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink", + xml: "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace", + xmlns: "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" + }; + d3.ns = { + prefix: d3_nsPrefix, + qualify: function(name) { + var i = name.indexOf(":"), prefix = name; + if (i >= 0) { + prefix = name.substring(0, i); + name = name.substring(i + 1); + } + return d3_nsPrefix.hasOwnProperty(prefix) ? { + space: d3_nsPrefix[prefix], + local: name + } : name; + } + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.attr = function(name, value) { + if (arguments.length < 2) { + if (typeof name === "string") { + var node = this.node(); + name = d3.ns.qualify(name); + return name.local ? node.getAttributeNS(name.space, name.local) : node.getAttribute(name); + } + for (value in name) this.each(d3_selection_attr(value, name[value])); + return this; + } + return this.each(d3_selection_attr(name, value)); + }; + function d3_selection_attr(name, value) { + name = d3.ns.qualify(name); + function attrNull() { + this.removeAttribute(name); + } + function attrNullNS() { + this.removeAttributeNS(name.space, name.local); + } + function attrConstant() { + this.setAttribute(name, value); + } + function attrConstantNS() { + this.setAttributeNS(name.space, name.local, value); + } + function attrFunction() { + var x = value.apply(this, arguments); + if (x == null) this.removeAttribute(name); else this.setAttribute(name, x); + } + function attrFunctionNS() { + var x = value.apply(this, arguments); + if (x == null) this.removeAttributeNS(name.space, name.local); else this.setAttributeNS(name.space, name.local, x); + } + return value == null ? name.local ? attrNullNS : attrNull : typeof value === "function" ? name.local ? attrFunctionNS : attrFunction : name.local ? attrConstantNS : attrConstant; + } + function d3_collapse(s) { + return s.trim().replace(/\s+/g, " "); + } + d3_selectionPrototype.classed = function(name, value) { + if (arguments.length < 2) { + if (typeof name === "string") { + var node = this.node(), n = (name = d3_selection_classes(name)).length, i = -1; + if (value = node.classList) { + while (++i < n) if (!value.contains(name[i])) return false; + } else { + value = node.getAttribute("class"); + while (++i < n) if (!d3_selection_classedRe(name[i]).test(value)) return false; + } + return true; + } + for (value in name) this.each(d3_selection_classed(value, name[value])); + return this; + } + return this.each(d3_selection_classed(name, value)); + }; + function d3_selection_classedRe(name) { + return new RegExp("(?:^|\\s+)" + d3.requote(name) + "(?:\\s+|$)", "g"); + } + function d3_selection_classes(name) { + return name.trim().split(/^|\s+/); + } + function d3_selection_classed(name, value) { + name = d3_selection_classes(name).map(d3_selection_classedName); + var n = name.length; + function classedConstant() { + var i = -1; + while (++i < n) name[i](this, value); + } + function classedFunction() { + var i = -1, x = value.apply(this, arguments); + while (++i < n) name[i](this, x); + } + return typeof value === "function" ? classedFunction : classedConstant; + } + function d3_selection_classedName(name) { + var re = d3_selection_classedRe(name); + return function(node, value) { + if (c = node.classList) return value ? c.add(name) : c.remove(name); + var c = node.getAttribute("class") || ""; + if (value) { + re.lastIndex = 0; + if (!re.test(c)) node.setAttribute("class", d3_collapse(c + " " + name)); + } else { + node.setAttribute("class", d3_collapse(c.replace(re, " "))); + } + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.style = function(name, value, priority) { + var n = arguments.length; + if (n < 3) { + if (typeof name !== "string") { + if (n < 2) value = ""; + for (priority in name) this.each(d3_selection_style(priority, name[priority], value)); + return this; + } + if (n < 2) return d3_window.getComputedStyle(this.node(), null).getPropertyValue(name); + priority = ""; + } + return this.each(d3_selection_style(name, value, priority)); + }; + function d3_selection_style(name, value, priority) { + function styleNull() { + this.style.removeProperty(name); + } + function styleConstant() { + this.style.setProperty(name, value, priority); + } + function styleFunction() { + var x = value.apply(this, arguments); + if (x == null) this.style.removeProperty(name); else this.style.setProperty(name, x, priority); + } + return value == null ? styleNull : typeof value === "function" ? styleFunction : styleConstant; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.property = function(name, value) { + if (arguments.length < 2) { + if (typeof name === "string") return this.node()[name]; + for (value in name) this.each(d3_selection_property(value, name[value])); + return this; + } + return this.each(d3_selection_property(name, value)); + }; + function d3_selection_property(name, value) { + function propertyNull() { + delete this[name]; + } + function propertyConstant() { + this[name] = value; + } + function propertyFunction() { + var x = value.apply(this, arguments); + if (x == null) delete this[name]; else this[name] = x; + } + return value == null ? propertyNull : typeof value === "function" ? propertyFunction : propertyConstant; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.text = function(value) { + return arguments.length ? this.each(typeof value === "function" ? function() { + var v = value.apply(this, arguments); + this.textContent = v == null ? "" : v; + } : value == null ? function() { + this.textContent = ""; + } : function() { + this.textContent = value; + }) : this.node().textContent; + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.html = function(value) { + return arguments.length ? this.each(typeof value === "function" ? function() { + var v = value.apply(this, arguments); + this.innerHTML = v == null ? "" : v; + } : value == null ? function() { + this.innerHTML = ""; + } : function() { + this.innerHTML = value; + }) : this.node().innerHTML; + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.append = function(name) { + name = d3_selection_creator(name); + return this.select(function() { + return this.appendChild(name.apply(this, arguments)); + }); + }; + function d3_selection_creator(name) { + return typeof name === "function" ? name : (name = d3.ns.qualify(name)).local ? function() { + return this.ownerDocument.createElementNS(name.space, name.local); + } : function() { + return this.ownerDocument.createElementNS(this.namespaceURI, name); + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.insert = function(name, before) { + name = d3_selection_creator(name); + before = d3_selection_selector(before); + return this.select(function() { + return this.insertBefore(name.apply(this, arguments), before.apply(this, arguments) || null); + }); + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.remove = function() { + return this.each(function() { + var parent = this.parentNode; + if (parent) parent.removeChild(this); + }); + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.data = function(value, key) { + var i = -1, n = this.length, group, node; + if (!arguments.length) { + value = new Array(n = (group = this[0]).length); + while (++i < n) { + if (node = group[i]) { + value[i] = node.__data__; + } + } + return value; + } + function bind(group, groupData) { + var i, n = group.length, m = groupData.length, n0 = Math.min(n, m), updateNodes = new Array(m), enterNodes = new Array(m), exitNodes = new Array(n), node, nodeData; + if (key) { + var nodeByKeyValue = new d3_Map(), dataByKeyValue = new d3_Map(), keyValues = [], keyValue; + for (i = -1; ++i < n; ) { + keyValue = key.call(node = group[i], node.__data__, i); + if (nodeByKeyValue.has(keyValue)) { + exitNodes[i] = node; + } else { + nodeByKeyValue.set(keyValue, node); + } + keyValues.push(keyValue); + } + for (i = -1; ++i < m; ) { + keyValue = key.call(groupData, nodeData = groupData[i], i); + if (node = nodeByKeyValue.get(keyValue)) { + updateNodes[i] = node; + node.__data__ = nodeData; + } else if (!dataByKeyValue.has(keyValue)) { + enterNodes[i] = d3_selection_dataNode(nodeData); + } + dataByKeyValue.set(keyValue, nodeData); + nodeByKeyValue.remove(keyValue); + } + for (i = -1; ++i < n; ) { + if (nodeByKeyValue.has(keyValues[i])) { + exitNodes[i] = group[i]; + } + } + } else { + for (i = -1; ++i < n0; ) { + node = group[i]; + nodeData = groupData[i]; + if (node) { + node.__data__ = nodeData; + updateNodes[i] = node; + } else { + enterNodes[i] = d3_selection_dataNode(nodeData); + } + } + for (;i < m; ++i) { + enterNodes[i] = d3_selection_dataNode(groupData[i]); + } + for (;i < n; ++i) { + exitNodes[i] = group[i]; + } + } + enterNodes.update = updateNodes; + enterNodes.parentNode = updateNodes.parentNode = exitNodes.parentNode = group.parentNode; + enter.push(enterNodes); + update.push(updateNodes); + exit.push(exitNodes); + } + var enter = d3_selection_enter([]), update = d3_selection([]), exit = d3_selection([]); + if (typeof value === "function") { + while (++i < n) { + bind(group = this[i], value.call(group, group.parentNode.__data__, i)); + } + } else { + while (++i < n) { + bind(group = this[i], value); + } + } + update.enter = function() { + return enter; + }; + update.exit = function() { + return exit; + }; + return update; + }; + function d3_selection_dataNode(data) { + return { + __data__: data + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.datum = function(value) { + return arguments.length ? this.property("__data__", value) : this.property("__data__"); + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.filter = function(filter) { + var subgroups = [], subgroup, group, node; + if (typeof filter !== "function") filter = d3_selection_filter(filter); + for (var j = 0, m = this.length; j < m; j++) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + subgroup.parentNode = (group = this[j]).parentNode; + for (var i = 0, n = group.length; i < n; i++) { + if ((node = group[i]) && filter.call(node, node.__data__, i, j)) { + subgroup.push(node); + } + } + } + return d3_selection(subgroups); + }; + function d3_selection_filter(selector) { + return function() { + return d3_selectMatches(this, selector); + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.order = function() { + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + for (var group = this[j], i = group.length - 1, next = group[i], node; --i >= 0; ) { + if (node = group[i]) { + if (next && next !== node.nextSibling) next.parentNode.insertBefore(node, next); + next = node; + } + } + } + return this; + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.sort = function(comparator) { + comparator = d3_selection_sortComparator.apply(this, arguments); + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) this[j].sort(comparator); + return this.order(); + }; + function d3_selection_sortComparator(comparator) { + if (!arguments.length) comparator = d3_ascending; + return function(a, b) { + return a && b ? comparator(a.__data__, b.__data__) : !a - !b; + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.each = function(callback) { + return d3_selection_each(this, function(node, i, j) { + callback.call(node, node.__data__, i, j); + }); + }; + function d3_selection_each(groups, callback) { + for (var j = 0, m = groups.length; j < m; j++) { + for (var group = groups[j], i = 0, n = group.length, node; i < n; i++) { + if (node = group[i]) callback(node, i, j); + } + } + return groups; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.call = function(callback) { + var args = d3_array(arguments); + callback.apply(args[0] = this, args); + return this; + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.empty = function() { + return !this.node(); + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.node = function() { + for (var j = 0, m = this.length; j < m; j++) { + for (var group = this[j], i = 0, n = group.length; i < n; i++) { + var node = group[i]; + if (node) return node; + } + } + return null; + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.size = function() { + var n = 0; + this.each(function() { + ++n; + }); + return n; + }; + function d3_selection_enter(selection) { + d3_subclass(selection, d3_selection_enterPrototype); + return selection; + } + var d3_selection_enterPrototype = []; + d3.selection.enter = d3_selection_enter; + d3.selection.enter.prototype = d3_selection_enterPrototype; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.append = d3_selectionPrototype.append; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.empty = d3_selectionPrototype.empty; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.node = d3_selectionPrototype.node; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.call = d3_selectionPrototype.call; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.size = d3_selectionPrototype.size; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.select = function(selector) { + var subgroups = [], subgroup, subnode, upgroup, group, node; + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + upgroup = (group = this[j]).update; + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + subgroup.parentNode = group.parentNode; + for (var i = -1, n = group.length; ++i < n; ) { + if (node = group[i]) { + subgroup.push(upgroup[i] = subnode = selector.call(group.parentNode, node.__data__, i, j)); + subnode.__data__ = node.__data__; + } else { + subgroup.push(null); + } + } + } + return d3_selection(subgroups); + }; + d3_selection_enterPrototype.insert = function(name, before) { + if (arguments.length < 2) before = d3_selection_enterInsertBefore(this); + return d3_selectionPrototype.insert.call(this, name, before); + }; + function d3_selection_enterInsertBefore(enter) { + var i0, j0; + return function(d, i, j) { + var group = enter[j].update, n = group.length, node; + if (j != j0) j0 = j, i0 = 0; + if (i >= i0) i0 = i + 1; + while (!(node = group[i0]) && ++i0 < n) ; + return node; + }; + } + d3_selectionPrototype.transition = function() { + var id = d3_transitionInheritId || ++d3_transitionId, subgroups = [], subgroup, node, transition = d3_transitionInherit || { + time: Date.now(), + ease: d3_ease_cubicInOut, + delay: 0, + duration: 250 + }; + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + for (var group = this[j], i = -1, n = group.length; ++i < n; ) { + if (node = group[i]) d3_transitionNode(node, i, id, transition); + subgroup.push(node); + } + } + return d3_transition(subgroups, id); + }; + d3_selectionPrototype.interrupt = function() { + return this.each(d3_selection_interrupt); + }; + function d3_selection_interrupt() { + var lock = this.__transition__; + if (lock) ++lock.active; + } + d3.select = function(node) { + var group = [ typeof node === "string" ? d3_select(node, d3_document) : node ]; + group.parentNode = d3_documentElement; + return d3_selection([ group ]); + }; + d3.selectAll = function(nodes) { + var group = d3_array(typeof nodes === "string" ? d3_selectAll(nodes, d3_document) : nodes); + group.parentNode = d3_documentElement; + return d3_selection([ group ]); + }; + var d3_selectionRoot = d3.select(d3_documentElement); + d3_selectionPrototype.on = function(type, listener, capture) { + var n = arguments.length; + if (n < 3) { + if (typeof type !== "string") { + if (n < 2) listener = false; + for (capture in type) this.each(d3_selection_on(capture, type[capture], listener)); + return this; + } + if (n < 2) return (n = this.node()["__on" + type]) && n._; + capture = false; + } + return this.each(d3_selection_on(type, listener, capture)); + }; + function d3_selection_on(type, listener, capture) { + var name = "__on" + type, i = type.indexOf("."), wrap = d3_selection_onListener; + if (i > 0) type = type.substring(0, i); + var filter = d3_selection_onFilters.get(type); + if (filter) type = filter, wrap = d3_selection_onFilter; + function onRemove() { + var l = this[name]; + if (l) { + this.removeEventListener(type, l, l.$); + delete this[name]; + } + } + function onAdd() { + var l = wrap(listener, d3_array(arguments)); + onRemove.call(this); + this.addEventListener(type, this[name] = l, l.$ = capture); + l._ = listener; + } + function removeAll() { + var re = new RegExp("^__on([^.]+)" + d3.requote(type) + "$"), match; + for (var name in this) { + if (match = name.match(re)) { + var l = this[name]; + this.removeEventListener(match[1], l, l.$); + delete this[name]; + } + } + } + return i ? listener ? onAdd : onRemove : listener ? d3_noop : removeAll; + } + var d3_selection_onFilters = d3.map({ + mouseenter: "mouseover", + mouseleave: "mouseout" + }); + d3_selection_onFilters.forEach(function(k) { + if ("on" + k in d3_document) d3_selection_onFilters.remove(k); + }); + function d3_selection_onListener(listener, argumentz) { + return function(e) { + var o = d3.event; + d3.event = e; + argumentz[0] = this.__data__; + try { + listener.apply(this, argumentz); + } finally { + d3.event = o; + } + }; + } + function d3_selection_onFilter(listener, argumentz) { + var l = d3_selection_onListener(listener, argumentz); + return function(e) { + var target = this, related = e.relatedTarget; + if (!related || related !== target && !(related.compareDocumentPosition(target) & 8)) { + l.call(target, e); + } + }; + } + var d3_event_dragSelect = "onselectstart" in d3_document ? null : d3_vendorSymbol(d3_documentElement.style, "userSelect"), d3_event_dragId = 0; + function d3_event_dragSuppress() { + var name = ".dragsuppress-" + ++d3_event_dragId, click = "click" + name, w = d3.select(d3_window).on("touchmove" + name, d3_eventPreventDefault).on("dragstart" + name, d3_eventPreventDefault).on("selectstart" + name, d3_eventPreventDefault); + if (d3_event_dragSelect) { + var style = d3_documentElement.style, select = style[d3_event_dragSelect]; + style[d3_event_dragSelect] = "none"; + } + return function(suppressClick) { + w.on(name, null); + if (d3_event_dragSelect) style[d3_event_dragSelect] = select; + if (suppressClick) { + function off() { + w.on(click, null); + } + w.on(click, function() { + d3_eventPreventDefault(); + off(); + }, true); + setTimeout(off, 0); + } + }; + } + d3.mouse = function(container) { + return d3_mousePoint(container, d3_eventSource()); + }; + function d3_mousePoint(container, e) { + if (e.changedTouches) e = e.changedTouches[0]; + var svg = container.ownerSVGElement || container; + if (svg.createSVGPoint) { + var point = svg.createSVGPoint(); + point.x = e.clientX, point.y = e.clientY; + point = point.matrixTransform(container.getScreenCTM().inverse()); + return [ point.x, point.y ]; + } + var rect = container.getBoundingClientRect(); + return [ e.clientX - rect.left - container.clientLeft, e.clientY - rect.top - container.clientTop ]; + } + d3.touches = function(container, touches) { + if (arguments.length < 2) touches = d3_eventSource().touches; + return touches ? d3_array(touches).map(function(touch) { + var point = d3_mousePoint(container, touch); + point.identifier = touch.identifier; + return point; + }) : []; + }; + d3.behavior.drag = function() { + var event = d3_eventDispatch(drag, "drag", "dragstart", "dragend"), origin = null, mousedown = dragstart(d3_noop, d3.mouse, d3_behavior_dragMouseSubject, "mousemove", "mouseup"), touchstart = dragstart(d3_behavior_dragTouchId, d3.touch, d3_behavior_dragTouchSubject, "touchmove", "touchend"); + function drag() { + this.on("mousedown.drag", mousedown).on("touchstart.drag", touchstart); + } + function dragstart(id, position, subject, move, end) { + return function() { + var that = this, target = d3.event.target, parent = that.parentNode, dispatch = event.of(that, arguments), dragged = 0, dragId = id(), dragName = ".drag" + (dragId == null ? "" : "-" + dragId), dragOffset, dragSubject = d3.select(subject()).on(move + dragName, moved).on(end + dragName, ended), dragRestore = d3_event_dragSuppress(), position0 = position(parent, dragId); + if (origin) { + dragOffset = origin.apply(that, arguments); + dragOffset = [ dragOffset.x - position0[0], dragOffset.y - position0[1] ]; + } else { + dragOffset = [ 0, 0 ]; + } + dispatch({ + type: "dragstart" + }); + function moved() { + var position1 = position(parent, dragId), dx, dy; + if (!position1) return; + dx = position1[0] - position0[0]; + dy = position1[1] - position0[1]; + dragged |= dx | dy; + position0 = position1; + dispatch({ + type: "drag", + x: position1[0] + dragOffset[0], + y: position1[1] + dragOffset[1], + dx: dx, + dy: dy + }); + } + function ended() { + if (!position(parent, dragId)) return; + dragSubject.on(move + dragName, null).on(end + dragName, null); + dragRestore(dragged && d3.event.target === target); + dispatch({ + type: "dragend" + }); + } + }; + } + drag.origin = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return origin; + origin = x; + return drag; + }; + return d3.rebind(drag, event, "on"); + }; + function d3_behavior_dragTouchId() { + return d3.event.changedTouches[0].identifier; + } + function d3_behavior_dragTouchSubject() { + return d3.event.target; + } + function d3_behavior_dragMouseSubject() { + return d3_window; + } + var π = Math.PI, τ = 2 * π, halfπ = π / 2, ε = 1e-6, ε2 = ε * ε, d3_radians = π / 180, d3_degrees = 180 / π; + function d3_sgn(x) { + return x > 0 ? 1 : x < 0 ? -1 : 0; + } + function d3_cross2d(a, b, c) { + return (b[0] - a[0]) * (c[1] - a[1]) - (b[1] - a[1]) * (c[0] - a[0]); + } + function d3_acos(x) { + return x > 1 ? 0 : x < -1 ? π : Math.acos(x); + } + function d3_asin(x) { + return x > 1 ? halfπ : x < -1 ? -halfπ : Math.asin(x); + } + function d3_sinh(x) { + return ((x = Math.exp(x)) - 1 / x) / 2; + } + function d3_cosh(x) { + return ((x = Math.exp(x)) + 1 / x) / 2; + } + function d3_tanh(x) { + return ((x = Math.exp(2 * x)) - 1) / (x + 1); + } + function d3_haversin(x) { + return (x = Math.sin(x / 2)) * x; + } + var ρ = Math.SQRT2, ρ2 = 2, ρ4 = 4; + d3.interpolateZoom = function(p0, p1) { + var ux0 = p0[0], uy0 = p0[1], w0 = p0[2], ux1 = p1[0], uy1 = p1[1], w1 = p1[2]; + var dx = ux1 - ux0, dy = uy1 - uy0, d2 = dx * dx + dy * dy, d1 = Math.sqrt(d2), b0 = (w1 * w1 - w0 * w0 + ρ4 * d2) / (2 * w0 * ρ2 * d1), b1 = (w1 * w1 - w0 * w0 - ρ4 * d2) / (2 * w1 * ρ2 * d1), r0 = Math.log(Math.sqrt(b0 * b0 + 1) - b0), r1 = Math.log(Math.sqrt(b1 * b1 + 1) - b1), dr = r1 - r0, S = (dr || Math.log(w1 / w0)) / ρ; + function interpolate(t) { + var s = t * S; + if (dr) { + var coshr0 = d3_cosh(r0), u = w0 / (ρ2 * d1) * (coshr0 * d3_tanh(ρ * s + r0) - d3_sinh(r0)); + return [ ux0 + u * dx, uy0 + u * dy, w0 * coshr0 / d3_cosh(ρ * s + r0) ]; + } + return [ ux0 + t * dx, uy0 + t * dy, w0 * Math.exp(ρ * s) ]; + } + interpolate.duration = S * 1e3; + return interpolate; + }; + d3.behavior.zoom = function() { + var view = { + x: 0, + y: 0, + k: 1 + }, translate0, center, size = [ 960, 500 ], scaleExtent = d3_behavior_zoomInfinity, mousedown = "mousedown.zoom", mousemove = "mousemove.zoom", mouseup = "mouseup.zoom", mousewheelTimer, touchstart = "touchstart.zoom", touchtime, event = d3_eventDispatch(zoom, "zoomstart", "zoom", "zoomend"), x0, x1, y0, y1; + function zoom(g) { + g.on(mousedown, mousedowned).on(d3_behavior_zoomWheel + ".zoom", mousewheeled).on(mousemove, mousewheelreset).on("dblclick.zoom", dblclicked).on(touchstart, touchstarted); + } + zoom.event = function(g) { + g.each(function() { + var dispatch = event.of(this, arguments), view1 = view; + if (d3_transitionInheritId) { + d3.select(this).transition().each("start.zoom", function() { + view = this.__chart__ || { + x: 0, + y: 0, + k: 1 + }; + zoomstarted(dispatch); + }).tween("zoom:zoom", function() { + var dx = size[0], dy = size[1], cx = dx / 2, cy = dy / 2, i = d3.interpolateZoom([ (cx - view.x) / view.k, (cy - view.y) / view.k, dx / view.k ], [ (cx - view1.x) / view1.k, (cy - view1.y) / view1.k, dx / view1.k ]); + return function(t) { + var l = i(t), k = dx / l[2]; + this.__chart__ = view = { + x: cx - l[0] * k, + y: cy - l[1] * k, + k: k + }; + zoomed(dispatch); + }; + }).each("end.zoom", function() { + zoomended(dispatch); + }); + } else { + this.__chart__ = view; + zoomstarted(dispatch); + zoomed(dispatch); + zoomended(dispatch); + } + }); + }; + zoom.translate = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ view.x, view.y ]; + view = { + x: +_[0], + y: +_[1], + k: view.k + }; + rescale(); + return zoom; + }; + zoom.scale = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return view.k; + view = { + x: view.x, + y: view.y, + k: +_ + }; + rescale(); + return zoom; + }; + zoom.scaleExtent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return scaleExtent; + scaleExtent = _ == null ? d3_behavior_zoomInfinity : [ +_[0], +_[1] ]; + return zoom; + }; + zoom.center = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return center; + center = _ && [ +_[0], +_[1] ]; + return zoom; + }; + zoom.size = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return size; + size = _ && [ +_[0], +_[1] ]; + return zoom; + }; + zoom.x = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return x1; + x1 = z; + x0 = z.copy(); + view = { + x: 0, + y: 0, + k: 1 + }; + return zoom; + }; + zoom.y = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return y1; + y1 = z; + y0 = z.copy(); + view = { + x: 0, + y: 0, + k: 1 + }; + return zoom; + }; + function location(p) { + return [ (p[0] - view.x) / view.k, (p[1] - view.y) / view.k ]; + } + function point(l) { + return [ l[0] * view.k + view.x, l[1] * view.k + view.y ]; + } + function scaleTo(s) { + view.k = Math.max(scaleExtent[0], Math.min(scaleExtent[1], s)); + } + function translateTo(p, l) { + l = point(l); + view.x += p[0] - l[0]; + view.y += p[1] - l[1]; + } + function rescale() { + if (x1) x1.domain(x0.range().map(function(x) { + return (x - view.x) / view.k; + }).map(x0.invert)); + if (y1) y1.domain(y0.range().map(function(y) { + return (y - view.y) / view.k; + }).map(y0.invert)); + } + function zoomstarted(dispatch) { + dispatch({ + type: "zoomstart" + }); + } + function zoomed(dispatch) { + rescale(); + dispatch({ + type: "zoom", + scale: view.k, + translate: [ view.x, view.y ] + }); + } + function zoomended(dispatch) { + dispatch({ + type: "zoomend" + }); + } + function mousedowned() { + var that = this, target = d3.event.target, dispatch = event.of(that, arguments), dragged = 0, subject = d3.select(d3_window).on(mousemove, moved).on(mouseup, ended), location0 = location(d3.mouse(that)), dragRestore = d3_event_dragSuppress(); + d3_selection_interrupt.call(that); + zoomstarted(dispatch); + function moved() { + dragged = 1; + translateTo(d3.mouse(that), location0); + zoomed(dispatch); + } + function ended() { + subject.on(mousemove, d3_window === that ? mousewheelreset : null).on(mouseup, null); + dragRestore(dragged && d3.event.target === target); + zoomended(dispatch); + } + } + function touchstarted() { + var that = this, dispatch = event.of(that, arguments), locations0 = {}, distance0 = 0, scale0, zoomName = ".zoom-" + d3.event.changedTouches[0].identifier, touchmove = "touchmove" + zoomName, touchend = "touchend" + zoomName, targets = [], subject = d3.select(that).on(mousedown, null).on(touchstart, started), dragRestore = d3_event_dragSuppress(); + d3_selection_interrupt.call(that); + started(); + zoomstarted(dispatch); + function relocate() { + var touches = d3.touches(that); + scale0 = view.k; + touches.forEach(function(t) { + if (t.identifier in locations0) locations0[t.identifier] = location(t); + }); + return touches; + } + function started() { + var target = d3.event.target; + d3.select(target).on(touchmove, moved).on(touchend, ended); + targets.push(target); + var changed = d3.event.changedTouches; + for (var i = 0, n = changed.length; i < n; ++i) { + locations0[changed[i].identifier] = null; + } + var touches = relocate(), now = Date.now(); + if (touches.length === 1) { + if (now - touchtime < 500) { + var p = touches[0], l = locations0[p.identifier]; + scaleTo(view.k * 2); + translateTo(p, l); + d3_eventPreventDefault(); + zoomed(dispatch); + } + touchtime = now; + } else if (touches.length > 1) { + var p = touches[0], q = touches[1], dx = p[0] - q[0], dy = p[1] - q[1]; + distance0 = dx * dx + dy * dy; + } + } + function moved() { + var touches = d3.touches(that), p0, l0, p1, l1; + for (var i = 0, n = touches.length; i < n; ++i, l1 = null) { + p1 = touches[i]; + if (l1 = locations0[p1.identifier]) { + if (l0) break; + p0 = p1, l0 = l1; + } + } + if (l1) { + var distance1 = (distance1 = p1[0] - p0[0]) * distance1 + (distance1 = p1[1] - p0[1]) * distance1, scale1 = distance0 && Math.sqrt(distance1 / distance0); + p0 = [ (p0[0] + p1[0]) / 2, (p0[1] + p1[1]) / 2 ]; + l0 = [ (l0[0] + l1[0]) / 2, (l0[1] + l1[1]) / 2 ]; + scaleTo(scale1 * scale0); + } + touchtime = null; + translateTo(p0, l0); + zoomed(dispatch); + } + function ended() { + if (d3.event.touches.length) { + var changed = d3.event.changedTouches; + for (var i = 0, n = changed.length; i < n; ++i) { + delete locations0[changed[i].identifier]; + } + for (var identifier in locations0) { + return void relocate(); + } + } + d3.selectAll(targets).on(zoomName, null); + subject.on(mousedown, mousedowned).on(touchstart, touchstarted); + dragRestore(); + zoomended(dispatch); + } + } + function mousewheeled() { + var dispatch = event.of(this, arguments); + if (mousewheelTimer) clearTimeout(mousewheelTimer); else d3_selection_interrupt.call(this), + zoomstarted(dispatch); + mousewheelTimer = setTimeout(function() { + mousewheelTimer = null; + zoomended(dispatch); + }, 50); + d3_eventPreventDefault(); + var point = center || d3.mouse(this); + if (!translate0) translate0 = location(point); + scaleTo(Math.pow(2, d3_behavior_zoomDelta() * .002) * view.k); + translateTo(point, translate0); + zoomed(dispatch); + } + function mousewheelreset() { + translate0 = null; + } + function dblclicked() { + var dispatch = event.of(this, arguments), p = d3.mouse(this), l = location(p), k = Math.log(view.k) / Math.LN2; + zoomstarted(dispatch); + scaleTo(Math.pow(2, d3.event.shiftKey ? Math.ceil(k) - 1 : Math.floor(k) + 1)); + translateTo(p, l); + zoomed(dispatch); + zoomended(dispatch); + } + return d3.rebind(zoom, event, "on"); + }; + var d3_behavior_zoomInfinity = [ 0, Infinity ]; + var d3_behavior_zoomDelta, d3_behavior_zoomWheel = "onwheel" in d3_document ? (d3_behavior_zoomDelta = function() { + return -d3.event.deltaY * (d3.event.deltaMode ? 120 : 1); + }, "wheel") : "onmousewheel" in d3_document ? (d3_behavior_zoomDelta = function() { + return d3.event.wheelDelta; + }, "mousewheel") : (d3_behavior_zoomDelta = function() { + return -d3.event.detail; + }, "MozMousePixelScroll"); + function d3_Color() {} + d3_Color.prototype.toString = function() { + return this.rgb() + ""; + }; + d3.hsl = function(h, s, l) { + return arguments.length === 1 ? h instanceof d3_Hsl ? d3_hsl(h.h, h.s, h.l) : d3_rgb_parse("" + h, d3_rgb_hsl, d3_hsl) : d3_hsl(+h, +s, +l); + }; + function d3_hsl(h, s, l) { + return new d3_Hsl(h, s, l); + } + function d3_Hsl(h, s, l) { + this.h = h; + this.s = s; + this.l = l; + } + var d3_hslPrototype = d3_Hsl.prototype = new d3_Color(); + d3_hslPrototype.brighter = function(k) { + k = Math.pow(.7, arguments.length ? k : 1); + return d3_hsl(this.h, this.s, this.l / k); + }; + d3_hslPrototype.darker = function(k) { + k = Math.pow(.7, arguments.length ? k : 1); + return d3_hsl(this.h, this.s, k * this.l); + }; + d3_hslPrototype.rgb = function() { + return d3_hsl_rgb(this.h, this.s, this.l); + }; + function d3_hsl_rgb(h, s, l) { + var m1, m2; + h = isNaN(h) ? 0 : (h %= 360) < 0 ? h + 360 : h; + s = isNaN(s) ? 0 : s < 0 ? 0 : s > 1 ? 1 : s; + l = l < 0 ? 0 : l > 1 ? 1 : l; + m2 = l <= .5 ? l * (1 + s) : l + s - l * s; + m1 = 2 * l - m2; + function v(h) { + if (h > 360) h -= 360; else if (h < 0) h += 360; + if (h < 60) return m1 + (m2 - m1) * h / 60; + if (h < 180) return m2; + if (h < 240) return m1 + (m2 - m1) * (240 - h) / 60; + return m1; + } + function vv(h) { + return Math.round(v(h) * 255); + } + return d3_rgb(vv(h + 120), vv(h), vv(h - 120)); + } + d3.hcl = function(h, c, l) { + return arguments.length === 1 ? h instanceof d3_Hcl ? d3_hcl(h.h, h.c, h.l) : h instanceof d3_Lab ? d3_lab_hcl(h.l, h.a, h.b) : d3_lab_hcl((h = d3_rgb_lab((h = d3.rgb(h)).r, h.g, h.b)).l, h.a, h.b) : d3_hcl(+h, +c, +l); + }; + function d3_hcl(h, c, l) { + return new d3_Hcl(h, c, l); + } + function d3_Hcl(h, c, l) { + this.h = h; + this.c = c; + this.l = l; + } + var d3_hclPrototype = d3_Hcl.prototype = new d3_Color(); + d3_hclPrototype.brighter = function(k) { + return d3_hcl(this.h, this.c, Math.min(100, this.l + d3_lab_K * (arguments.length ? k : 1))); + }; + d3_hclPrototype.darker = function(k) { + return d3_hcl(this.h, this.c, Math.max(0, this.l - d3_lab_K * (arguments.length ? k : 1))); + }; + d3_hclPrototype.rgb = function() { + return d3_hcl_lab(this.h, this.c, this.l).rgb(); + }; + function d3_hcl_lab(h, c, l) { + if (isNaN(h)) h = 0; + if (isNaN(c)) c = 0; + return d3_lab(l, Math.cos(h *= d3_radians) * c, Math.sin(h) * c); + } + d3.lab = function(l, a, b) { + return arguments.length === 1 ? l instanceof d3_Lab ? d3_lab(l.l, l.a, l.b) : l instanceof d3_Hcl ? d3_hcl_lab(l.l, l.c, l.h) : d3_rgb_lab((l = d3.rgb(l)).r, l.g, l.b) : d3_lab(+l, +a, +b); + }; + function d3_lab(l, a, b) { + return new d3_Lab(l, a, b); + } + function d3_Lab(l, a, b) { + this.l = l; + this.a = a; + this.b = b; + } + var d3_lab_K = 18; + var d3_lab_X = .95047, d3_lab_Y = 1, d3_lab_Z = 1.08883; + var d3_labPrototype = d3_Lab.prototype = new d3_Color(); + d3_labPrototype.brighter = function(k) { + return d3_lab(Math.min(100, this.l + d3_lab_K * (arguments.length ? k : 1)), this.a, this.b); + }; + d3_labPrototype.darker = function(k) { + return d3_lab(Math.max(0, this.l - d3_lab_K * (arguments.length ? k : 1)), this.a, this.b); + }; + d3_labPrototype.rgb = function() { + return d3_lab_rgb(this.l, this.a, this.b); + }; + function d3_lab_rgb(l, a, b) { + var y = (l + 16) / 116, x = y + a / 500, z = y - b / 200; + x = d3_lab_xyz(x) * d3_lab_X; + y = d3_lab_xyz(y) * d3_lab_Y; + z = d3_lab_xyz(z) * d3_lab_Z; + return d3_rgb(d3_xyz_rgb(3.2404542 * x - 1.5371385 * y - .4985314 * z), d3_xyz_rgb(-.969266 * x + 1.8760108 * y + .041556 * z), d3_xyz_rgb(.0556434 * x - .2040259 * y + 1.0572252 * z)); + } + function d3_lab_hcl(l, a, b) { + return l > 0 ? d3_hcl(Math.atan2(b, a) * d3_degrees, Math.sqrt(a * a + b * b), l) : d3_hcl(NaN, NaN, l); + } + function d3_lab_xyz(x) { + return x > .206893034 ? x * x * x : (x - 4 / 29) / 7.787037; + } + function d3_xyz_lab(x) { + return x > .008856 ? Math.pow(x, 1 / 3) : 7.787037 * x + 4 / 29; + } + function d3_xyz_rgb(r) { + return Math.round(255 * (r <= .00304 ? 12.92 * r : 1.055 * Math.pow(r, 1 / 2.4) - .055)); + } + d3.rgb = function(r, g, b) { + return arguments.length === 1 ? r instanceof d3_Rgb ? d3_rgb(r.r, r.g, r.b) : d3_rgb_parse("" + r, d3_rgb, d3_hsl_rgb) : d3_rgb(~~r, ~~g, ~~b); + }; + function d3_rgbNumber(value) { + return d3_rgb(value >> 16, value >> 8 & 255, value & 255); + } + function d3_rgbString(value) { + return d3_rgbNumber(value) + ""; + } + function d3_rgb(r, g, b) { + return new d3_Rgb(r, g, b); + } + function d3_Rgb(r, g, b) { + this.r = r; + this.g = g; + this.b = b; + } + var d3_rgbPrototype = d3_Rgb.prototype = new d3_Color(); + d3_rgbPrototype.brighter = function(k) { + k = Math.pow(.7, arguments.length ? k : 1); + var r = this.r, g = this.g, b = this.b, i = 30; + if (!r && !g && !b) return d3_rgb(i, i, i); + if (r && r < i) r = i; + if (g && g < i) g = i; + if (b && b < i) b = i; + return d3_rgb(Math.min(255, ~~(r / k)), Math.min(255, ~~(g / k)), Math.min(255, ~~(b / k))); + }; + d3_rgbPrototype.darker = function(k) { + k = Math.pow(.7, arguments.length ? k : 1); + return d3_rgb(~~(k * this.r), ~~(k * this.g), ~~(k * this.b)); + }; + d3_rgbPrototype.hsl = function() { + return d3_rgb_hsl(this.r, this.g, this.b); + }; + d3_rgbPrototype.toString = function() { + return "#" + d3_rgb_hex(this.r) + d3_rgb_hex(this.g) + d3_rgb_hex(this.b); + }; + function d3_rgb_hex(v) { + return v < 16 ? "0" + Math.max(0, v).toString(16) : Math.min(255, v).toString(16); + } + function d3_rgb_parse(format, rgb, hsl) { + var r = 0, g = 0, b = 0, m1, m2, color; + m1 = /([a-z]+)\((.*)\)/i.exec(format); + if (m1) { + m2 = m1[2].split(","); + switch (m1[1]) { + case "hsl": + { + return hsl(parseFloat(m2[0]), parseFloat(m2[1]) / 100, parseFloat(m2[2]) / 100); + } + + case "rgb": + { + return rgb(d3_rgb_parseNumber(m2[0]), d3_rgb_parseNumber(m2[1]), d3_rgb_parseNumber(m2[2])); + } + } + } + if (color = d3_rgb_names.get(format)) return rgb(color.r, color.g, color.b); + if (format != null && format.charAt(0) === "#" && !isNaN(color = parseInt(format.substring(1), 16))) { + if (format.length === 4) { + r = (color & 3840) >> 4; + r = r >> 4 | r; + g = color & 240; + g = g >> 4 | g; + b = color & 15; + b = b << 4 | b; + } else if (format.length === 7) { + r = (color & 16711680) >> 16; + g = (color & 65280) >> 8; + b = color & 255; + } + } + return rgb(r, g, b); + } + function d3_rgb_hsl(r, g, b) { + var min = Math.min(r /= 255, g /= 255, b /= 255), max = Math.max(r, g, b), d = max - min, h, s, l = (max + min) / 2; + if (d) { + s = l < .5 ? d / (max + min) : d / (2 - max - min); + if (r == max) h = (g - b) / d + (g < b ? 6 : 0); else if (g == max) h = (b - r) / d + 2; else h = (r - g) / d + 4; + h *= 60; + } else { + h = NaN; + s = l > 0 && l < 1 ? 0 : h; + } + return d3_hsl(h, s, l); + } + function d3_rgb_lab(r, g, b) { + r = d3_rgb_xyz(r); + g = d3_rgb_xyz(g); + b = d3_rgb_xyz(b); + var x = d3_xyz_lab((.4124564 * r + .3575761 * g + .1804375 * b) / d3_lab_X), y = d3_xyz_lab((.2126729 * r + .7151522 * g + .072175 * b) / d3_lab_Y), z = d3_xyz_lab((.0193339 * r + .119192 * g + .9503041 * b) / d3_lab_Z); + return d3_lab(116 * y - 16, 500 * (x - y), 200 * (y - z)); + } + function d3_rgb_xyz(r) { + return (r /= 255) <= .04045 ? r / 12.92 : Math.pow((r + .055) / 1.055, 2.4); + } + function d3_rgb_parseNumber(c) { + var f = parseFloat(c); + return c.charAt(c.length - 1) === "%" ? Math.round(f * 2.55) : f; + } + var d3_rgb_names = d3.map({ + aliceblue: 15792383, + antiquewhite: 16444375, + aqua: 65535, + aquamarine: 8388564, + azure: 15794175, + beige: 16119260, + bisque: 16770244, + black: 0, + blanchedalmond: 16772045, + blue: 255, + blueviolet: 9055202, + brown: 10824234, + burlywood: 14596231, + cadetblue: 6266528, + chartreuse: 8388352, + chocolate: 13789470, + coral: 16744272, + cornflowerblue: 6591981, + cornsilk: 16775388, + crimson: 14423100, + cyan: 65535, + darkblue: 139, + darkcyan: 35723, + darkgoldenrod: 12092939, + darkgray: 11119017, + darkgreen: 25600, + darkgrey: 11119017, + darkkhaki: 12433259, + darkmagenta: 9109643, + darkolivegreen: 5597999, + darkorange: 16747520, + darkorchid: 10040012, + darkred: 9109504, + darksalmon: 15308410, + darkseagreen: 9419919, + darkslateblue: 4734347, + darkslategray: 3100495, + darkslategrey: 3100495, + darkturquoise: 52945, + darkviolet: 9699539, + deeppink: 16716947, + deepskyblue: 49151, + dimgray: 6908265, + dimgrey: 6908265, + dodgerblue: 2003199, + firebrick: 11674146, + floralwhite: 16775920, + forestgreen: 2263842, + fuchsia: 16711935, + gainsboro: 14474460, + ghostwhite: 16316671, + gold: 16766720, + goldenrod: 14329120, + gray: 8421504, + green: 32768, + greenyellow: 11403055, + grey: 8421504, + honeydew: 15794160, + hotpink: 16738740, + indianred: 13458524, + indigo: 4915330, + ivory: 16777200, + khaki: 15787660, + lavender: 15132410, + lavenderblush: 16773365, + lawngreen: 8190976, + lemonchiffon: 16775885, + lightblue: 11393254, + lightcoral: 15761536, + lightcyan: 14745599, + lightgoldenrodyellow: 16448210, + lightgray: 13882323, + lightgreen: 9498256, + lightgrey: 13882323, + lightpink: 16758465, + lightsalmon: 16752762, + lightseagreen: 2142890, + lightskyblue: 8900346, + lightslategray: 7833753, + lightslategrey: 7833753, + lightsteelblue: 11584734, + lightyellow: 16777184, + lime: 65280, + limegreen: 3329330, + linen: 16445670, + magenta: 16711935, + maroon: 8388608, + mediumaquamarine: 6737322, + mediumblue: 205, + mediumorchid: 12211667, + mediumpurple: 9662683, + mediumseagreen: 3978097, + mediumslateblue: 8087790, + mediumspringgreen: 64154, + mediumturquoise: 4772300, + mediumvioletred: 13047173, + midnightblue: 1644912, + mintcream: 16121850, + mistyrose: 16770273, + moccasin: 16770229, + navajowhite: 16768685, + navy: 128, + oldlace: 16643558, + olive: 8421376, + olivedrab: 7048739, + orange: 16753920, + orangered: 16729344, + orchid: 14315734, + palegoldenrod: 15657130, + palegreen: 10025880, + paleturquoise: 11529966, + palevioletred: 14381203, + papayawhip: 16773077, + peachpuff: 16767673, + peru: 13468991, + pink: 16761035, + plum: 14524637, + powderblue: 11591910, + purple: 8388736, + red: 16711680, + rosybrown: 12357519, + royalblue: 4286945, + saddlebrown: 9127187, + salmon: 16416882, + sandybrown: 16032864, + seagreen: 3050327, + seashell: 16774638, + sienna: 10506797, + silver: 12632256, + skyblue: 8900331, + slateblue: 6970061, + slategray: 7372944, + slategrey: 7372944, + snow: 16775930, + springgreen: 65407, + steelblue: 4620980, + tan: 13808780, + teal: 32896, + thistle: 14204888, + tomato: 16737095, + turquoise: 4251856, + violet: 15631086, + wheat: 16113331, + white: 16777215, + whitesmoke: 16119285, + yellow: 16776960, + yellowgreen: 10145074 + }); + d3_rgb_names.forEach(function(key, value) { + d3_rgb_names.set(key, d3_rgbNumber(value)); + }); + function d3_functor(v) { + return typeof v === "function" ? v : function() { + return v; + }; + } + d3.functor = d3_functor; + function d3_identity(d) { + return d; + } + d3.xhr = d3_xhrType(d3_identity); + function d3_xhrType(response) { + return function(url, mimeType, callback) { + if (arguments.length === 2 && typeof mimeType === "function") callback = mimeType, + mimeType = null; + return d3_xhr(url, mimeType, response, callback); + }; + } + function d3_xhr(url, mimeType, response, callback) { + var xhr = {}, dispatch = d3.dispatch("beforesend", "progress", "load", "error"), headers = {}, request = new XMLHttpRequest(), responseType = null; + if (d3_window.XDomainRequest && !("withCredentials" in request) && /^(http(s)?:)?\/\//.test(url)) request = new XDomainRequest(); + "onload" in request ? request.onload = request.onerror = respond : request.onreadystatechange = function() { + request.readyState > 3 && respond(); + }; + function respond() { + var status = request.status, result; + if (!status && request.responseText || status >= 200 && status < 300 || status === 304) { + try { + result = response.call(xhr, request); + } catch (e) { + dispatch.error.call(xhr, e); + return; + } + dispatch.load.call(xhr, result); + } else { + dispatch.error.call(xhr, request); + } + } + request.onprogress = function(event) { + var o = d3.event; + d3.event = event; + try { + dispatch.progress.call(xhr, request); + } finally { + d3.event = o; + } + }; + xhr.header = function(name, value) { + name = (name + "").toLowerCase(); + if (arguments.length < 2) return headers[name]; + if (value == null) delete headers[name]; else headers[name] = value + ""; + return xhr; + }; + xhr.mimeType = function(value) { + if (!arguments.length) return mimeType; + mimeType = value == null ? null : value + ""; + return xhr; + }; + xhr.responseType = function(value) { + if (!arguments.length) return responseType; + responseType = value; + return xhr; + }; + xhr.response = function(value) { + response = value; + return xhr; + }; + [ "get", "post" ].forEach(function(method) { + xhr[method] = function() { + return xhr.send.apply(xhr, [ method ].concat(d3_array(arguments))); + }; + }); + xhr.send = function(method, data, callback) { + if (arguments.length === 2 && typeof data === "function") callback = data, data = null; + request.open(method, url, true); + if (mimeType != null && !("accept" in headers)) headers["accept"] = mimeType + ",*/*"; + if (request.setRequestHeader) for (var name in headers) request.setRequestHeader(name, headers[name]); + if (mimeType != null && request.overrideMimeType) request.overrideMimeType(mimeType); + if (responseType != null) request.responseType = responseType; + if (callback != null) xhr.on("error", callback).on("load", function(request) { + callback(null, request); + }); + dispatch.beforesend.call(xhr, request); + request.send(data == null ? null : data); + return xhr; + }; + xhr.abort = function() { + request.abort(); + return xhr; + }; + d3.rebind(xhr, dispatch, "on"); + return callback == null ? xhr : xhr.get(d3_xhr_fixCallback(callback)); + } + function d3_xhr_fixCallback(callback) { + return callback.length === 1 ? function(error, request) { + callback(error == null ? request : null); + } : callback; + } + d3.dsv = function(delimiter, mimeType) { + var reFormat = new RegExp('["' + delimiter + "\n]"), delimiterCode = delimiter.charCodeAt(0); + function dsv(url, row, callback) { + if (arguments.length < 3) callback = row, row = null; + var xhr = d3_xhr(url, mimeType, row == null ? response : typedResponse(row), callback); + xhr.row = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? xhr.response((row = _) == null ? response : typedResponse(_)) : row; + }; + return xhr; + } + function response(request) { + return dsv.parse(request.responseText); + } + function typedResponse(f) { + return function(request) { + return dsv.parse(request.responseText, f); + }; + } + dsv.parse = function(text, f) { + var o; + return dsv.parseRows(text, function(row, i) { + if (o) return o(row, i - 1); + var a = new Function("d", "return {" + row.map(function(name, i) { + return JSON.stringify(name) + ": d[" + i + "]"; + }).join(",") + "}"); + o = f ? function(row, i) { + return f(a(row), i); + } : a; + }); + }; + dsv.parseRows = function(text, f) { + var EOL = {}, EOF = {}, rows = [], N = text.length, I = 0, n = 0, t, eol; + function token() { + if (I >= N) return EOF; + if (eol) return eol = false, EOL; + var j = I; + if (text.charCodeAt(j) === 34) { + var i = j; + while (i++ < N) { + if (text.charCodeAt(i) === 34) { + if (text.charCodeAt(i + 1) !== 34) break; + ++i; + } + } + I = i + 2; + var c = text.charCodeAt(i + 1); + if (c === 13) { + eol = true; + if (text.charCodeAt(i + 2) === 10) ++I; + } else if (c === 10) { + eol = true; + } + return text.substring(j + 1, i).replace(/""/g, '"'); + } + while (I < N) { + var c = text.charCodeAt(I++), k = 1; + if (c === 10) eol = true; else if (c === 13) { + eol = true; + if (text.charCodeAt(I) === 10) ++I, ++k; + } else if (c !== delimiterCode) continue; + return text.substring(j, I - k); + } + return text.substring(j); + } + while ((t = token()) !== EOF) { + var a = []; + while (t !== EOL && t !== EOF) { + a.push(t); + t = token(); + } + if (f && !(a = f(a, n++))) continue; + rows.push(a); + } + return rows; + }; + dsv.format = function(rows) { + if (Array.isArray(rows[0])) return dsv.formatRows(rows); + var fieldSet = new d3_Set(), fields = []; + rows.forEach(function(row) { + for (var field in row) { + if (!fieldSet.has(field)) { + fields.push(fieldSet.add(field)); + } + } + }); + return [ fields.map(formatValue).join(delimiter) ].concat(rows.map(function(row) { + return fields.map(function(field) { + return formatValue(row[field]); + }).join(delimiter); + })).join("\n"); + }; + dsv.formatRows = function(rows) { + return rows.map(formatRow).join("\n"); + }; + function formatRow(row) { + return row.map(formatValue).join(delimiter); + } + function formatValue(text) { + return reFormat.test(text) ? '"' + text.replace(/\"/g, '""') + '"' : text; + } + return dsv; + }; + d3.csv = d3.dsv(",", "text/csv"); + d3.tsv = d3.dsv(" ", "text/tab-separated-values"); + d3.touch = function(container, touches, identifier) { + if (arguments.length < 3) identifier = touches, touches = d3_eventSource().changedTouches; + if (touches) for (var i = 0, n = touches.length, touch; i < n; ++i) { + if ((touch = touches[i]).identifier === identifier) { + return d3_mousePoint(container, touch); + } + } + }; + var d3_timer_queueHead, d3_timer_queueTail, d3_timer_interval, d3_timer_timeout, d3_timer_active, d3_timer_frame = d3_window[d3_vendorSymbol(d3_window, "requestAnimationFrame")] || function(callback) { + setTimeout(callback, 17); + }; + d3.timer = function(callback, delay, then) { + var n = arguments.length; + if (n < 2) delay = 0; + if (n < 3) then = Date.now(); + var time = then + delay, timer = { + c: callback, + t: time, + f: false, + n: null + }; + if (d3_timer_queueTail) d3_timer_queueTail.n = timer; else d3_timer_queueHead = timer; + d3_timer_queueTail = timer; + if (!d3_timer_interval) { + d3_timer_timeout = clearTimeout(d3_timer_timeout); + d3_timer_interval = 1; + d3_timer_frame(d3_timer_step); + } + }; + function d3_timer_step() { + var now = d3_timer_mark(), delay = d3_timer_sweep() - now; + if (delay > 24) { + if (isFinite(delay)) { + clearTimeout(d3_timer_timeout); + d3_timer_timeout = setTimeout(d3_timer_step, delay); + } + d3_timer_interval = 0; + } else { + d3_timer_interval = 1; + d3_timer_frame(d3_timer_step); + } + } + d3.timer.flush = function() { + d3_timer_mark(); + d3_timer_sweep(); + }; + function d3_timer_mark() { + var now = Date.now(); + d3_timer_active = d3_timer_queueHead; + while (d3_timer_active) { + if (now >= d3_timer_active.t) d3_timer_active.f = d3_timer_active.c(now - d3_timer_active.t); + d3_timer_active = d3_timer_active.n; + } + return now; + } + function d3_timer_sweep() { + var t0, t1 = d3_timer_queueHead, time = Infinity; + while (t1) { + if (t1.f) { + t1 = t0 ? t0.n = t1.n : d3_timer_queueHead = t1.n; + } else { + if (t1.t < time) time = t1.t; + t1 = (t0 = t1).n; + } + } + d3_timer_queueTail = t0; + return time; + } + function d3_format_precision(x, p) { + return p - (x ? Math.ceil(Math.log(x) / Math.LN10) : 1); + } + d3.round = function(x, n) { + return n ? Math.round(x * (n = Math.pow(10, n))) / n : Math.round(x); + }; + var d3_formatPrefixes = [ "y", "z", "a", "f", "p", "n", "µ", "m", "", "k", "M", "G", "T", "P", "E", "Z", "Y" ].map(d3_formatPrefix); + d3.formatPrefix = function(value, precision) { + var i = 0; + if (value) { + if (value < 0) value *= -1; + if (precision) value = d3.round(value, d3_format_precision(value, precision)); + i = 1 + Math.floor(1e-12 + Math.log(value) / Math.LN10); + i = Math.max(-24, Math.min(24, Math.floor((i - 1) / 3) * 3)); + } + return d3_formatPrefixes[8 + i / 3]; + }; + function d3_formatPrefix(d, i) { + var k = Math.pow(10, abs(8 - i) * 3); + return { + scale: i > 8 ? function(d) { + return d / k; + } : function(d) { + return d * k; + }, + symbol: d + }; + } + function d3_locale_numberFormat(locale) { + var locale_decimal = locale.decimal, locale_thousands = locale.thousands, locale_grouping = locale.grouping, locale_currency = locale.currency, formatGroup = locale_grouping ? function(value) { + var i = value.length, t = [], j = 0, g = locale_grouping[0]; + while (i > 0 && g > 0) { + t.push(value.substring(i -= g, i + g)); + g = locale_grouping[j = (j + 1) % locale_grouping.length]; + } + return t.reverse().join(locale_thousands); + } : d3_identity; + return function(specifier) { + var match = d3_format_re.exec(specifier), fill = match[1] || " ", align = match[2] || ">", sign = match[3] || "", symbol = match[4] || "", zfill = match[5], width = +match[6], comma = match[7], precision = match[8], type = match[9], scale = 1, prefix = "", suffix = "", integer = false; + if (precision) precision = +precision.substring(1); + if (zfill || fill === "0" && align === "=") { + zfill = fill = "0"; + align = "="; + if (comma) width -= Math.floor((width - 1) / 4); + } + switch (type) { + case "n": + comma = true; + type = "g"; + break; + + case "%": + scale = 100; + suffix = "%"; + type = "f"; + break; + + case "p": + scale = 100; + suffix = "%"; + type = "r"; + break; + + case "b": + case "o": + case "x": + case "X": + if (symbol === "#") prefix = "0" + type.toLowerCase(); + + case "c": + case "d": + integer = true; + precision = 0; + break; + + case "s": + scale = -1; + type = "r"; + break; + } + if (symbol === "$") prefix = locale_currency[0], suffix = locale_currency[1]; + if (type == "r" && !precision) type = "g"; + if (precision != null) { + if (type == "g") precision = Math.max(1, Math.min(21, precision)); else if (type == "e" || type == "f") precision = Math.max(0, Math.min(20, precision)); + } + type = d3_format_types.get(type) || d3_format_typeDefault; + var zcomma = zfill && comma; + return function(value) { + var fullSuffix = suffix; + if (integer && value % 1) return ""; + var negative = value < 0 || value === 0 && 1 / value < 0 ? (value = -value, "-") : sign; + if (scale < 0) { + var unit = d3.formatPrefix(value, precision); + value = unit.scale(value); + fullSuffix = unit.symbol + suffix; + } else { + value *= scale; + } + value = type(value, precision); + var i = value.lastIndexOf("."), before = i < 0 ? value : value.substring(0, i), after = i < 0 ? "" : locale_decimal + value.substring(i + 1); + if (!zfill && comma) before = formatGroup(before); + var length = prefix.length + before.length + after.length + (zcomma ? 0 : negative.length), padding = length < width ? new Array(length = width - length + 1).join(fill) : ""; + if (zcomma) before = formatGroup(padding + before); + negative += prefix; + value = before + after; + return (align === "<" ? negative + value + padding : align === ">" ? padding + negative + value : align === "^" ? padding.substring(0, length >>= 1) + negative + value + padding.substring(length) : negative + (zcomma ? value : padding + value)) + fullSuffix; + }; + }; + } + var d3_format_re = /(?:([^{])?([<>=^]))?([+\- ])?([$#])?(0)?(\d+)?(,)?(\.-?\d+)?([a-z%])?/i; + var d3_format_types = d3.map({ + b: function(x) { + return x.toString(2); + }, + c: function(x) { + return String.fromCharCode(x); + }, + o: function(x) { + return x.toString(8); + }, + x: function(x) { + return x.toString(16); + }, + X: function(x) { + return x.toString(16).toUpperCase(); + }, + g: function(x, p) { + return x.toPrecision(p); + }, + e: function(x, p) { + return x.toExponential(p); + }, + f: function(x, p) { + return x.toFixed(p); + }, + r: function(x, p) { + return (x = d3.round(x, d3_format_precision(x, p))).toFixed(Math.max(0, Math.min(20, d3_format_precision(x * (1 + 1e-15), p)))); + } + }); + function d3_format_typeDefault(x) { + return x + ""; + } + var d3_time = d3.time = {}, d3_date = Date; + function d3_date_utc() { + this._ = new Date(arguments.length > 1 ? Date.UTC.apply(this, arguments) : arguments[0]); + } + d3_date_utc.prototype = { + getDate: function() { + return this._.getUTCDate(); + }, + getDay: function() { + return this._.getUTCDay(); + }, + getFullYear: function() { + return this._.getUTCFullYear(); + }, + getHours: function() { + return this._.getUTCHours(); + }, + getMilliseconds: function() { + return this._.getUTCMilliseconds(); + }, + getMinutes: function() { + return this._.getUTCMinutes(); + }, + getMonth: function() { + return this._.getUTCMonth(); + }, + getSeconds: function() { + return this._.getUTCSeconds(); + }, + getTime: function() { + return this._.getTime(); + }, + getTimezoneOffset: function() { + return 0; + }, + valueOf: function() { + return this._.valueOf(); + }, + setDate: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCDate.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setDay: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCDay.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setFullYear: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCFullYear.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setHours: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCHours.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setMilliseconds: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCMilliseconds.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setMinutes: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCMinutes.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setMonth: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCMonth.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setSeconds: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setUTCSeconds.apply(this._, arguments); + }, + setTime: function() { + d3_time_prototype.setTime.apply(this._, arguments); + } + }; + var d3_time_prototype = Date.prototype; + function d3_time_interval(local, step, number) { + function round(date) { + var d0 = local(date), d1 = offset(d0, 1); + return date - d0 < d1 - date ? d0 : d1; + } + function ceil(date) { + step(date = local(new d3_date(date - 1)), 1); + return date; + } + function offset(date, k) { + step(date = new d3_date(+date), k); + return date; + } + function range(t0, t1, dt) { + var time = ceil(t0), times = []; + if (dt > 1) { + while (time < t1) { + if (!(number(time) % dt)) times.push(new Date(+time)); + step(time, 1); + } + } else { + while (time < t1) times.push(new Date(+time)), step(time, 1); + } + return times; + } + function range_utc(t0, t1, dt) { + try { + d3_date = d3_date_utc; + var utc = new d3_date_utc(); + utc._ = t0; + return range(utc, t1, dt); + } finally { + d3_date = Date; + } + } + local.floor = local; + local.round = round; + local.ceil = ceil; + local.offset = offset; + local.range = range; + var utc = local.utc = d3_time_interval_utc(local); + utc.floor = utc; + utc.round = d3_time_interval_utc(round); + utc.ceil = d3_time_interval_utc(ceil); + utc.offset = d3_time_interval_utc(offset); + utc.range = range_utc; + return local; + } + function d3_time_interval_utc(method) { + return function(date, k) { + try { + d3_date = d3_date_utc; + var utc = new d3_date_utc(); + utc._ = date; + return method(utc, k)._; + } finally { + d3_date = Date; + } + }; + } + d3_time.year = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + date = d3_time.day(date); + date.setMonth(0, 1); + return date; + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setFullYear(date.getFullYear() + offset); + }, function(date) { + return date.getFullYear(); + }); + d3_time.years = d3_time.year.range; + d3_time.years.utc = d3_time.year.utc.range; + d3_time.day = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + var day = new d3_date(2e3, 0); + day.setFullYear(date.getFullYear(), date.getMonth(), date.getDate()); + return day; + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setDate(date.getDate() + offset); + }, function(date) { + return date.getDate() - 1; + }); + d3_time.days = d3_time.day.range; + d3_time.days.utc = d3_time.day.utc.range; + d3_time.dayOfYear = function(date) { + var year = d3_time.year(date); + return Math.floor((date - year - (date.getTimezoneOffset() - year.getTimezoneOffset()) * 6e4) / 864e5); + }; + [ "sunday", "monday", "tuesday", "wednesday", "thursday", "friday", "saturday" ].forEach(function(day, i) { + i = 7 - i; + var interval = d3_time[day] = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + (date = d3_time.day(date)).setDate(date.getDate() - (date.getDay() + i) % 7); + return date; + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setDate(date.getDate() + Math.floor(offset) * 7); + }, function(date) { + var day = d3_time.year(date).getDay(); + return Math.floor((d3_time.dayOfYear(date) + (day + i) % 7) / 7) - (day !== i); + }); + d3_time[day + "s"] = interval.range; + d3_time[day + "s"].utc = interval.utc.range; + d3_time[day + "OfYear"] = function(date) { + var day = d3_time.year(date).getDay(); + return Math.floor((d3_time.dayOfYear(date) + (day + i) % 7) / 7); + }; + }); + d3_time.week = d3_time.sunday; + d3_time.weeks = d3_time.sunday.range; + d3_time.weeks.utc = d3_time.sunday.utc.range; + d3_time.weekOfYear = d3_time.sundayOfYear; + function d3_locale_timeFormat(locale) { + var locale_dateTime = locale.dateTime, locale_date = locale.date, locale_time = locale.time, locale_periods = locale.periods, locale_days = locale.days, locale_shortDays = locale.shortDays, locale_months = locale.months, locale_shortMonths = locale.shortMonths; + function d3_time_format(template) { + var n = template.length; + function format(date) { + var string = [], i = -1, j = 0, c, p, f; + while (++i < n) { + if (template.charCodeAt(i) === 37) { + string.push(template.substring(j, i)); + if ((p = d3_time_formatPads[c = template.charAt(++i)]) != null) c = template.charAt(++i); + if (f = d3_time_formats[c]) c = f(date, p == null ? c === "e" ? " " : "0" : p); + string.push(c); + j = i + 1; + } + } + string.push(template.substring(j, i)); + return string.join(""); + } + format.parse = function(string) { + var d = { + y: 1900, + m: 0, + d: 1, + H: 0, + M: 0, + S: 0, + L: 0, + Z: null + }, i = d3_time_parse(d, template, string, 0); + if (i != string.length) return null; + if ("p" in d) d.H = d.H % 12 + d.p * 12; + var localZ = d.Z != null && d3_date !== d3_date_utc, date = new (localZ ? d3_date_utc : d3_date)(); + if ("j" in d) date.setFullYear(d.y, 0, d.j); else if ("w" in d && ("W" in d || "U" in d)) { + date.setFullYear(d.y, 0, 1); + date.setFullYear(d.y, 0, "W" in d ? (d.w + 6) % 7 + d.W * 7 - (date.getDay() + 5) % 7 : d.w + d.U * 7 - (date.getDay() + 6) % 7); + } else date.setFullYear(d.y, d.m, d.d); + date.setHours(d.H + Math.floor(d.Z / 100), d.M + d.Z % 100, d.S, d.L); + return localZ ? date._ : date; + }; + format.toString = function() { + return template; + }; + return format; + } + function d3_time_parse(date, template, string, j) { + var c, p, t, i = 0, n = template.length, m = string.length; + while (i < n) { + if (j >= m) return -1; + c = template.charCodeAt(i++); + if (c === 37) { + t = template.charAt(i++); + p = d3_time_parsers[t in d3_time_formatPads ? template.charAt(i++) : t]; + if (!p || (j = p(date, string, j)) < 0) return -1; + } else if (c != string.charCodeAt(j++)) { + return -1; + } + } + return j; + } + d3_time_format.utc = function(template) { + var local = d3_time_format(template); + function format(date) { + try { + d3_date = d3_date_utc; + var utc = new d3_date(); + utc._ = date; + return local(utc); + } finally { + d3_date = Date; + } + } + format.parse = function(string) { + try { + d3_date = d3_date_utc; + var date = local.parse(string); + return date && date._; + } finally { + d3_date = Date; + } + }; + format.toString = local.toString; + return format; + }; + d3_time_format.multi = d3_time_format.utc.multi = d3_time_formatMulti; + var d3_time_periodLookup = d3.map(), d3_time_dayRe = d3_time_formatRe(locale_days), d3_time_dayLookup = d3_time_formatLookup(locale_days), d3_time_dayAbbrevRe = d3_time_formatRe(locale_shortDays), d3_time_dayAbbrevLookup = d3_time_formatLookup(locale_shortDays), d3_time_monthRe = d3_time_formatRe(locale_months), d3_time_monthLookup = d3_time_formatLookup(locale_months), d3_time_monthAbbrevRe = d3_time_formatRe(locale_shortMonths), d3_time_monthAbbrevLookup = d3_time_formatLookup(locale_shortMonths); + locale_periods.forEach(function(p, i) { + d3_time_periodLookup.set(p.toLowerCase(), i); + }); + var d3_time_formats = { + a: function(d) { + return locale_shortDays[d.getDay()]; + }, + A: function(d) { + return locale_days[d.getDay()]; + }, + b: function(d) { + return locale_shortMonths[d.getMonth()]; + }, + B: function(d) { + return locale_months[d.getMonth()]; + }, + c: d3_time_format(locale_dateTime), + d: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getDate(), p, 2); + }, + e: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getDate(), p, 2); + }, + H: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getHours(), p, 2); + }, + I: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getHours() % 12 || 12, p, 2); + }, + j: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(1 + d3_time.dayOfYear(d), p, 3); + }, + L: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getMilliseconds(), p, 3); + }, + m: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getMonth() + 1, p, 2); + }, + M: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getMinutes(), p, 2); + }, + p: function(d) { + return locale_periods[+(d.getHours() >= 12)]; + }, + S: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getSeconds(), p, 2); + }, + U: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d3_time.sundayOfYear(d), p, 2); + }, + w: function(d) { + return d.getDay(); + }, + W: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d3_time.mondayOfYear(d), p, 2); + }, + x: d3_time_format(locale_date), + X: d3_time_format(locale_time), + y: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getFullYear() % 100, p, 2); + }, + Y: function(d, p) { + return d3_time_formatPad(d.getFullYear() % 1e4, p, 4); + }, + Z: d3_time_zone, + "%": function() { + return "%"; + } + }; + var d3_time_parsers = { + a: d3_time_parseWeekdayAbbrev, + A: d3_time_parseWeekday, + b: d3_time_parseMonthAbbrev, + B: d3_time_parseMonth, + c: d3_time_parseLocaleFull, + d: d3_time_parseDay, + e: d3_time_parseDay, + H: d3_time_parseHour24, + I: d3_time_parseHour24, + j: d3_time_parseDayOfYear, + L: d3_time_parseMilliseconds, + m: d3_time_parseMonthNumber, + M: d3_time_parseMinutes, + p: d3_time_parseAmPm, + S: d3_time_parseSeconds, + U: d3_time_parseWeekNumberSunday, + w: d3_time_parseWeekdayNumber, + W: d3_time_parseWeekNumberMonday, + x: d3_time_parseLocaleDate, + X: d3_time_parseLocaleTime, + y: d3_time_parseYear, + Y: d3_time_parseFullYear, + Z: d3_time_parseZone, + "%": d3_time_parseLiteralPercent + }; + function d3_time_parseWeekdayAbbrev(date, string, i) { + d3_time_dayAbbrevRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_dayAbbrevRe.exec(string.substring(i)); + return n ? (date.w = d3_time_dayAbbrevLookup.get(n[0].toLowerCase()), i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseWeekday(date, string, i) { + d3_time_dayRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_dayRe.exec(string.substring(i)); + return n ? (date.w = d3_time_dayLookup.get(n[0].toLowerCase()), i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseMonthAbbrev(date, string, i) { + d3_time_monthAbbrevRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_monthAbbrevRe.exec(string.substring(i)); + return n ? (date.m = d3_time_monthAbbrevLookup.get(n[0].toLowerCase()), i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseMonth(date, string, i) { + d3_time_monthRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_monthRe.exec(string.substring(i)); + return n ? (date.m = d3_time_monthLookup.get(n[0].toLowerCase()), i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseLocaleFull(date, string, i) { + return d3_time_parse(date, d3_time_formats.c.toString(), string, i); + } + function d3_time_parseLocaleDate(date, string, i) { + return d3_time_parse(date, d3_time_formats.x.toString(), string, i); + } + function d3_time_parseLocaleTime(date, string, i) { + return d3_time_parse(date, d3_time_formats.X.toString(), string, i); + } + function d3_time_parseAmPm(date, string, i) { + var n = d3_time_periodLookup.get(string.substring(i, i += 2).toLowerCase()); + return n == null ? -1 : (date.p = n, i); + } + return d3_time_format; + } + var d3_time_formatPads = { + "-": "", + _: " ", + "0": "0" + }, d3_time_numberRe = /^\s*\d+/, d3_time_percentRe = /^%/; + function d3_time_formatPad(value, fill, width) { + var sign = value < 0 ? "-" : "", string = (sign ? -value : value) + "", length = string.length; + return sign + (length < width ? new Array(width - length + 1).join(fill) + string : string); + } + function d3_time_formatRe(names) { + return new RegExp("^(?:" + names.map(d3.requote).join("|") + ")", "i"); + } + function d3_time_formatLookup(names) { + var map = new d3_Map(), i = -1, n = names.length; + while (++i < n) map.set(names[i].toLowerCase(), i); + return map; + } + function d3_time_parseWeekdayNumber(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 1)); + return n ? (date.w = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseWeekNumberSunday(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i)); + return n ? (date.U = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseWeekNumberMonday(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i)); + return n ? (date.W = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseFullYear(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 4)); + return n ? (date.y = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseYear(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 2)); + return n ? (date.y = d3_time_expandYear(+n[0]), i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseZone(date, string, i) { + return /^[+-]\d{4}$/.test(string = string.substring(i, i + 5)) ? (date.Z = -string, + i + 5) : -1; + } + function d3_time_expandYear(d) { + return d + (d > 68 ? 1900 : 2e3); + } + function d3_time_parseMonthNumber(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 2)); + return n ? (date.m = n[0] - 1, i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseDay(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 2)); + return n ? (date.d = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseDayOfYear(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 3)); + return n ? (date.j = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseHour24(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 2)); + return n ? (date.H = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseMinutes(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 2)); + return n ? (date.M = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseSeconds(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 2)); + return n ? (date.S = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_parseMilliseconds(date, string, i) { + d3_time_numberRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_numberRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 3)); + return n ? (date.L = +n[0], i + n[0].length) : -1; + } + function d3_time_zone(d) { + var z = d.getTimezoneOffset(), zs = z > 0 ? "-" : "+", zh = ~~(abs(z) / 60), zm = abs(z) % 60; + return zs + d3_time_formatPad(zh, "0", 2) + d3_time_formatPad(zm, "0", 2); + } + function d3_time_parseLiteralPercent(date, string, i) { + d3_time_percentRe.lastIndex = 0; + var n = d3_time_percentRe.exec(string.substring(i, i + 1)); + return n ? i + n[0].length : -1; + } + function d3_time_formatMulti(formats) { + var n = formats.length, i = -1; + while (++i < n) formats[i][0] = this(formats[i][0]); + return function(date) { + var i = 0, f = formats[i]; + while (!f[1](date)) f = formats[++i]; + return f[0](date); + }; + } + d3.locale = function(locale) { + return { + numberFormat: d3_locale_numberFormat(locale), + timeFormat: d3_locale_timeFormat(locale) + }; + }; + var d3_locale_enUS = d3.locale({ + decimal: ".", + thousands: ",", + grouping: [ 3 ], + currency: [ "$", "" ], + dateTime: "%a %b %e %X %Y", + date: "%m/%d/%Y", + time: "%H:%M:%S", + periods: [ "AM", "PM" ], + days: [ "Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday" ], + shortDays: [ "Sun", "Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat" ], + months: [ "January", "February", "March", "April", "May", "June", "July", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December" ], + shortMonths: [ "Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "Apr", "May", "Jun", "Jul", "Aug", "Sep", "Oct", "Nov", "Dec" ] + }); + d3.format = d3_locale_enUS.numberFormat; + d3.geo = {}; + function d3_adder() {} + d3_adder.prototype = { + s: 0, + t: 0, + add: function(y) { + d3_adderSum(y, this.t, d3_adderTemp); + d3_adderSum(d3_adderTemp.s, this.s, this); + if (this.s) this.t += d3_adderTemp.t; else this.s = d3_adderTemp.t; + }, + reset: function() { + this.s = this.t = 0; + }, + valueOf: function() { + return this.s; + } + }; + var d3_adderTemp = new d3_adder(); + function d3_adderSum(a, b, o) { + var x = o.s = a + b, bv = x - a, av = x - bv; + o.t = a - av + (b - bv); + } + d3.geo.stream = function(object, listener) { + if (object && d3_geo_streamObjectType.hasOwnProperty(object.type)) { + d3_geo_streamObjectType[object.type](object, listener); + } else { + d3_geo_streamGeometry(object, listener); + } + }; + function d3_geo_streamGeometry(geometry, listener) { + if (geometry && d3_geo_streamGeometryType.hasOwnProperty(geometry.type)) { + d3_geo_streamGeometryType[geometry.type](geometry, listener); + } + } + var d3_geo_streamObjectType = { + Feature: function(feature, listener) { + d3_geo_streamGeometry(feature.geometry, listener); + }, + FeatureCollection: function(object, listener) { + var features = object.features, i = -1, n = features.length; + while (++i < n) d3_geo_streamGeometry(features[i].geometry, listener); + } + }; + var d3_geo_streamGeometryType = { + Sphere: function(object, listener) { + listener.sphere(); + }, + Point: function(object, listener) { + object = object.coordinates; + listener.point(object[0], object[1], object[2]); + }, + MultiPoint: function(object, listener) { + var coordinates = object.coordinates, i = -1, n = coordinates.length; + while (++i < n) object = coordinates[i], listener.point(object[0], object[1], object[2]); + }, + LineString: function(object, listener) { + d3_geo_streamLine(object.coordinates, listener, 0); + }, + MultiLineString: function(object, listener) { + var coordinates = object.coordinates, i = -1, n = coordinates.length; + while (++i < n) d3_geo_streamLine(coordinates[i], listener, 0); + }, + Polygon: function(object, listener) { + d3_geo_streamPolygon(object.coordinates, listener); + }, + MultiPolygon: function(object, listener) { + var coordinates = object.coordinates, i = -1, n = coordinates.length; + while (++i < n) d3_geo_streamPolygon(coordinates[i], listener); + }, + GeometryCollection: function(object, listener) { + var geometries = object.geometries, i = -1, n = geometries.length; + while (++i < n) d3_geo_streamGeometry(geometries[i], listener); + } + }; + function d3_geo_streamLine(coordinates, listener, closed) { + var i = -1, n = coordinates.length - closed, coordinate; + listener.lineStart(); + while (++i < n) coordinate = coordinates[i], listener.point(coordinate[0], coordinate[1], coordinate[2]); + listener.lineEnd(); + } + function d3_geo_streamPolygon(coordinates, listener) { + var i = -1, n = coordinates.length; + listener.polygonStart(); + while (++i < n) d3_geo_streamLine(coordinates[i], listener, 1); + listener.polygonEnd(); + } + d3.geo.area = function(object) { + d3_geo_areaSum = 0; + d3.geo.stream(object, d3_geo_area); + return d3_geo_areaSum; + }; + var d3_geo_areaSum, d3_geo_areaRingSum = new d3_adder(); + var d3_geo_area = { + sphere: function() { + d3_geo_areaSum += 4 * π; + }, + point: d3_noop, + lineStart: d3_noop, + lineEnd: d3_noop, + polygonStart: function() { + d3_geo_areaRingSum.reset(); + d3_geo_area.lineStart = d3_geo_areaRingStart; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + var area = 2 * d3_geo_areaRingSum; + d3_geo_areaSum += area < 0 ? 4 * π + area : area; + d3_geo_area.lineStart = d3_geo_area.lineEnd = d3_geo_area.point = d3_noop; + } + }; + function d3_geo_areaRingStart() { + var λ00, φ00, λ0, cosφ0, sinφ0; + d3_geo_area.point = function(λ, φ) { + d3_geo_area.point = nextPoint; + λ0 = (λ00 = λ) * d3_radians, cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ = (φ00 = φ) * d3_radians / 2 + π / 4), + sinφ0 = Math.sin(φ); + }; + function nextPoint(λ, φ) { + λ *= d3_radians; + φ = φ * d3_radians / 2 + π / 4; + var dλ = λ - λ0, sdλ = dλ >= 0 ? 1 : -1, adλ = sdλ * dλ, cosφ = Math.cos(φ), sinφ = Math.sin(φ), k = sinφ0 * sinφ, u = cosφ0 * cosφ + k * Math.cos(adλ), v = k * sdλ * Math.sin(adλ); + d3_geo_areaRingSum.add(Math.atan2(v, u)); + λ0 = λ, cosφ0 = cosφ, sinφ0 = sinφ; + } + d3_geo_area.lineEnd = function() { + nextPoint(λ00, φ00); + }; + } + function d3_geo_cartesian(spherical) { + var λ = spherical[0], φ = spherical[1], cosφ = Math.cos(φ); + return [ cosφ * Math.cos(λ), cosφ * Math.sin(λ), Math.sin(φ) ]; + } + function d3_geo_cartesianDot(a, b) { + return a[0] * b[0] + a[1] * b[1] + a[2] * b[2]; + } + function d3_geo_cartesianCross(a, b) { + return [ a[1] * b[2] - a[2] * b[1], a[2] * b[0] - a[0] * b[2], a[0] * b[1] - a[1] * b[0] ]; + } + function d3_geo_cartesianAdd(a, b) { + a[0] += b[0]; + a[1] += b[1]; + a[2] += b[2]; + } + function d3_geo_cartesianScale(vector, k) { + return [ vector[0] * k, vector[1] * k, vector[2] * k ]; + } + function d3_geo_cartesianNormalize(d) { + var l = Math.sqrt(d[0] * d[0] + d[1] * d[1] + d[2] * d[2]); + d[0] /= l; + d[1] /= l; + d[2] /= l; + } + function d3_geo_spherical(cartesian) { + return [ Math.atan2(cartesian[1], cartesian[0]), d3_asin(cartesian[2]) ]; + } + function d3_geo_sphericalEqual(a, b) { + return abs(a[0] - b[0]) < ε && abs(a[1] - b[1]) < ε; + } + d3.geo.bounds = function() { + var λ0, φ0, λ1, φ1, λ_, λ__, φ__, p0, dλSum, ranges, range; + var bound = { + point: point, + lineStart: lineStart, + lineEnd: lineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + bound.point = ringPoint; + bound.lineStart = ringStart; + bound.lineEnd = ringEnd; + dλSum = 0; + d3_geo_area.polygonStart(); + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + d3_geo_area.polygonEnd(); + bound.point = point; + bound.lineStart = lineStart; + bound.lineEnd = lineEnd; + if (d3_geo_areaRingSum < 0) λ0 = -(λ1 = 180), φ0 = -(φ1 = 90); else if (dλSum > ε) φ1 = 90; else if (dλSum < -ε) φ0 = -90; + range[0] = λ0, range[1] = λ1; + } + }; + function point(λ, φ) { + ranges.push(range = [ λ0 = λ, λ1 = λ ]); + if (φ < φ0) φ0 = φ; + if (φ > φ1) φ1 = φ; + } + function linePoint(λ, φ) { + var p = d3_geo_cartesian([ λ * d3_radians, φ * d3_radians ]); + if (p0) { + var normal = d3_geo_cartesianCross(p0, p), equatorial = [ normal[1], -normal[0], 0 ], inflection = d3_geo_cartesianCross(equatorial, normal); + d3_geo_cartesianNormalize(inflection); + inflection = d3_geo_spherical(inflection); + var dλ = λ - λ_, s = dλ > 0 ? 1 : -1, λi = inflection[0] * d3_degrees * s, antimeridian = abs(dλ) > 180; + if (antimeridian ^ (s * λ_ < λi && λi < s * λ)) { + var φi = inflection[1] * d3_degrees; + if (φi > φ1) φ1 = φi; + } else if (λi = (λi + 360) % 360 - 180, antimeridian ^ (s * λ_ < λi && λi < s * λ)) { + var φi = -inflection[1] * d3_degrees; + if (φi < φ0) φ0 = φi; + } else { + if (φ < φ0) φ0 = φ; + if (φ > φ1) φ1 = φ; + } + if (antimeridian) { + if (λ < λ_) { + if (angle(λ0, λ) > angle(λ0, λ1)) λ1 = λ; + } else { + if (angle(λ, λ1) > angle(λ0, λ1)) λ0 = λ; + } + } else { + if (λ1 >= λ0) { + if (λ < λ0) λ0 = λ; + if (λ > λ1) λ1 = λ; + } else { + if (λ > λ_) { + if (angle(λ0, λ) > angle(λ0, λ1)) λ1 = λ; + } else { + if (angle(λ, λ1) > angle(λ0, λ1)) λ0 = λ; + } + } + } + } else { + point(λ, φ); + } + p0 = p, λ_ = λ; + } + function lineStart() { + bound.point = linePoint; + } + function lineEnd() { + range[0] = λ0, range[1] = λ1; + bound.point = point; + p0 = null; + } + function ringPoint(λ, φ) { + if (p0) { + var dλ = λ - λ_; + dλSum += abs(dλ) > 180 ? dλ + (dλ > 0 ? 360 : -360) : dλ; + } else λ__ = λ, φ__ = φ; + d3_geo_area.point(λ, φ); + linePoint(λ, φ); + } + function ringStart() { + d3_geo_area.lineStart(); + } + function ringEnd() { + ringPoint(λ__, φ__); + d3_geo_area.lineEnd(); + if (abs(dλSum) > ε) λ0 = -(λ1 = 180); + range[0] = λ0, range[1] = λ1; + p0 = null; + } + function angle(λ0, λ1) { + return (λ1 -= λ0) < 0 ? λ1 + 360 : λ1; + } + function compareRanges(a, b) { + return a[0] - b[0]; + } + function withinRange(x, range) { + return range[0] <= range[1] ? range[0] <= x && x <= range[1] : x < range[0] || range[1] < x; + } + return function(feature) { + φ1 = λ1 = -(λ0 = φ0 = Infinity); + ranges = []; + d3.geo.stream(feature, bound); + var n = ranges.length; + if (n) { + ranges.sort(compareRanges); + for (var i = 1, a = ranges[0], b, merged = [ a ]; i < n; ++i) { + b = ranges[i]; + if (withinRange(b[0], a) || withinRange(b[1], a)) { + if (angle(a[0], b[1]) > angle(a[0], a[1])) a[1] = b[1]; + if (angle(b[0], a[1]) > angle(a[0], a[1])) a[0] = b[0]; + } else { + merged.push(a = b); + } + } + var best = -Infinity, dλ; + for (var n = merged.length - 1, i = 0, a = merged[n], b; i <= n; a = b, ++i) { + b = merged[i]; + if ((dλ = angle(a[1], b[0])) > best) best = dλ, λ0 = b[0], λ1 = a[1]; + } + } + ranges = range = null; + return λ0 === Infinity || φ0 === Infinity ? [ [ NaN, NaN ], [ NaN, NaN ] ] : [ [ λ0, φ0 ], [ λ1, φ1 ] ]; + }; + }(); + d3.geo.centroid = function(object) { + d3_geo_centroidW0 = d3_geo_centroidW1 = d3_geo_centroidX0 = d3_geo_centroidY0 = d3_geo_centroidZ0 = d3_geo_centroidX1 = d3_geo_centroidY1 = d3_geo_centroidZ1 = d3_geo_centroidX2 = d3_geo_centroidY2 = d3_geo_centroidZ2 = 0; + d3.geo.stream(object, d3_geo_centroid); + var x = d3_geo_centroidX2, y = d3_geo_centroidY2, z = d3_geo_centroidZ2, m = x * x + y * y + z * z; + if (m < ε2) { + x = d3_geo_centroidX1, y = d3_geo_centroidY1, z = d3_geo_centroidZ1; + if (d3_geo_centroidW1 < ε) x = d3_geo_centroidX0, y = d3_geo_centroidY0, z = d3_geo_centroidZ0; + m = x * x + y * y + z * z; + if (m < ε2) return [ NaN, NaN ]; + } + return [ Math.atan2(y, x) * d3_degrees, d3_asin(z / Math.sqrt(m)) * d3_degrees ]; + }; + var d3_geo_centroidW0, d3_geo_centroidW1, d3_geo_centroidX0, d3_geo_centroidY0, d3_geo_centroidZ0, d3_geo_centroidX1, d3_geo_centroidY1, d3_geo_centroidZ1, d3_geo_centroidX2, d3_geo_centroidY2, d3_geo_centroidZ2; + var d3_geo_centroid = { + sphere: d3_noop, + point: d3_geo_centroidPoint, + lineStart: d3_geo_centroidLineStart, + lineEnd: d3_geo_centroidLineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + d3_geo_centroid.lineStart = d3_geo_centroidRingStart; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + d3_geo_centroid.lineStart = d3_geo_centroidLineStart; + } + }; + function d3_geo_centroidPoint(λ, φ) { + λ *= d3_radians; + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ *= d3_radians); + d3_geo_centroidPointXYZ(cosφ * Math.cos(λ), cosφ * Math.sin(λ), Math.sin(φ)); + } + function d3_geo_centroidPointXYZ(x, y, z) { + ++d3_geo_centroidW0; + d3_geo_centroidX0 += (x - d3_geo_centroidX0) / d3_geo_centroidW0; + d3_geo_centroidY0 += (y - d3_geo_centroidY0) / d3_geo_centroidW0; + d3_geo_centroidZ0 += (z - d3_geo_centroidZ0) / d3_geo_centroidW0; + } + function d3_geo_centroidLineStart() { + var x0, y0, z0; + d3_geo_centroid.point = function(λ, φ) { + λ *= d3_radians; + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ *= d3_radians); + x0 = cosφ * Math.cos(λ); + y0 = cosφ * Math.sin(λ); + z0 = Math.sin(φ); + d3_geo_centroid.point = nextPoint; + d3_geo_centroidPointXYZ(x0, y0, z0); + }; + function nextPoint(λ, φ) { + λ *= d3_radians; + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ *= d3_radians), x = cosφ * Math.cos(λ), y = cosφ * Math.sin(λ), z = Math.sin(φ), w = Math.atan2(Math.sqrt((w = y0 * z - z0 * y) * w + (w = z0 * x - x0 * z) * w + (w = x0 * y - y0 * x) * w), x0 * x + y0 * y + z0 * z); + d3_geo_centroidW1 += w; + d3_geo_centroidX1 += w * (x0 + (x0 = x)); + d3_geo_centroidY1 += w * (y0 + (y0 = y)); + d3_geo_centroidZ1 += w * (z0 + (z0 = z)); + d3_geo_centroidPointXYZ(x0, y0, z0); + } + } + function d3_geo_centroidLineEnd() { + d3_geo_centroid.point = d3_geo_centroidPoint; + } + function d3_geo_centroidRingStart() { + var λ00, φ00, x0, y0, z0; + d3_geo_centroid.point = function(λ, φ) { + λ00 = λ, φ00 = φ; + d3_geo_centroid.point = nextPoint; + λ *= d3_radians; + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ *= d3_radians); + x0 = cosφ * Math.cos(λ); + y0 = cosφ * Math.sin(λ); + z0 = Math.sin(φ); + d3_geo_centroidPointXYZ(x0, y0, z0); + }; + d3_geo_centroid.lineEnd = function() { + nextPoint(λ00, φ00); + d3_geo_centroid.lineEnd = d3_geo_centroidLineEnd; + d3_geo_centroid.point = d3_geo_centroidPoint; + }; + function nextPoint(λ, φ) { + λ *= d3_radians; + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ *= d3_radians), x = cosφ * Math.cos(λ), y = cosφ * Math.sin(λ), z = Math.sin(φ), cx = y0 * z - z0 * y, cy = z0 * x - x0 * z, cz = x0 * y - y0 * x, m = Math.sqrt(cx * cx + cy * cy + cz * cz), u = x0 * x + y0 * y + z0 * z, v = m && -d3_acos(u) / m, w = Math.atan2(m, u); + d3_geo_centroidX2 += v * cx; + d3_geo_centroidY2 += v * cy; + d3_geo_centroidZ2 += v * cz; + d3_geo_centroidW1 += w; + d3_geo_centroidX1 += w * (x0 + (x0 = x)); + d3_geo_centroidY1 += w * (y0 + (y0 = y)); + d3_geo_centroidZ1 += w * (z0 + (z0 = z)); + d3_geo_centroidPointXYZ(x0, y0, z0); + } + } + function d3_true() { + return true; + } + function d3_geo_clipPolygon(segments, compare, clipStartInside, interpolate, listener) { + var subject = [], clip = []; + segments.forEach(function(segment) { + if ((n = segment.length - 1) <= 0) return; + var n, p0 = segment[0], p1 = segment[n]; + if (d3_geo_sphericalEqual(p0, p1)) { + listener.lineStart(); + for (var i = 0; i < n; ++i) listener.point((p0 = segment[i])[0], p0[1]); + listener.lineEnd(); + return; + } + var a = new d3_geo_clipPolygonIntersection(p0, segment, null, true), b = new d3_geo_clipPolygonIntersection(p0, null, a, false); + a.o = b; + subject.push(a); + clip.push(b); + a = new d3_geo_clipPolygonIntersection(p1, segment, null, false); + b = new d3_geo_clipPolygonIntersection(p1, null, a, true); + a.o = b; + subject.push(a); + clip.push(b); + }); + clip.sort(compare); + d3_geo_clipPolygonLinkCircular(subject); + d3_geo_clipPolygonLinkCircular(clip); + if (!subject.length) return; + for (var i = 0, entry = clipStartInside, n = clip.length; i < n; ++i) { + clip[i].e = entry = !entry; + } + var start = subject[0], points, point; + while (1) { + var current = start, isSubject = true; + while (current.v) if ((current = current.n) === start) return; + points = current.z; + listener.lineStart(); + do { + current.v = current.o.v = true; + if (current.e) { + if (isSubject) { + for (var i = 0, n = points.length; i < n; ++i) listener.point((point = points[i])[0], point[1]); + } else { + interpolate(current.x, current.n.x, 1, listener); + } + current = current.n; + } else { + if (isSubject) { + points = current.p.z; + for (var i = points.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) listener.point((point = points[i])[0], point[1]); + } else { + interpolate(current.x, current.p.x, -1, listener); + } + current = current.p; + } + current = current.o; + points = current.z; + isSubject = !isSubject; + } while (!current.v); + listener.lineEnd(); + } + } + function d3_geo_clipPolygonLinkCircular(array) { + if (!(n = array.length)) return; + var n, i = 0, a = array[0], b; + while (++i < n) { + a.n = b = array[i]; + b.p = a; + a = b; + } + a.n = b = array[0]; + b.p = a; + } + function d3_geo_clipPolygonIntersection(point, points, other, entry) { + this.x = point; + this.z = points; + this.o = other; + this.e = entry; + this.v = false; + this.n = this.p = null; + } + function d3_geo_clip(pointVisible, clipLine, interpolate, clipStart) { + return function(rotate, listener) { + var line = clipLine(listener), rotatedClipStart = rotate.invert(clipStart[0], clipStart[1]); + var clip = { + point: point, + lineStart: lineStart, + lineEnd: lineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + clip.point = pointRing; + clip.lineStart = ringStart; + clip.lineEnd = ringEnd; + segments = []; + polygon = []; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + clip.point = point; + clip.lineStart = lineStart; + clip.lineEnd = lineEnd; + segments = d3.merge(segments); + var clipStartInside = d3_geo_pointInPolygon(rotatedClipStart, polygon); + if (segments.length) { + if (!polygonStarted) listener.polygonStart(), polygonStarted = true; + d3_geo_clipPolygon(segments, d3_geo_clipSort, clipStartInside, interpolate, listener); + } else if (clipStartInside) { + if (!polygonStarted) listener.polygonStart(), polygonStarted = true; + listener.lineStart(); + interpolate(null, null, 1, listener); + listener.lineEnd(); + } + if (polygonStarted) listener.polygonEnd(), polygonStarted = false; + segments = polygon = null; + }, + sphere: function() { + listener.polygonStart(); + listener.lineStart(); + interpolate(null, null, 1, listener); + listener.lineEnd(); + listener.polygonEnd(); + } + }; + function point(λ, φ) { + var point = rotate(λ, φ); + if (pointVisible(λ = point[0], φ = point[1])) listener.point(λ, φ); + } + function pointLine(λ, φ) { + var point = rotate(λ, φ); + line.point(point[0], point[1]); + } + function lineStart() { + clip.point = pointLine; + line.lineStart(); + } + function lineEnd() { + clip.point = point; + line.lineEnd(); + } + var segments; + var buffer = d3_geo_clipBufferListener(), ringListener = clipLine(buffer), polygonStarted = false, polygon, ring; + function pointRing(λ, φ) { + ring.push([ λ, φ ]); + var point = rotate(λ, φ); + ringListener.point(point[0], point[1]); + } + function ringStart() { + ringListener.lineStart(); + ring = []; + } + function ringEnd() { + pointRing(ring[0][0], ring[0][1]); + ringListener.lineEnd(); + var clean = ringListener.clean(), ringSegments = buffer.buffer(), segment, n = ringSegments.length; + ring.pop(); + polygon.push(ring); + ring = null; + if (!n) return; + if (clean & 1) { + segment = ringSegments[0]; + var n = segment.length - 1, i = -1, point; + if (n > 0) { + if (!polygonStarted) listener.polygonStart(), polygonStarted = true; + listener.lineStart(); + while (++i < n) listener.point((point = segment[i])[0], point[1]); + listener.lineEnd(); + } + return; + } + if (n > 1 && clean & 2) ringSegments.push(ringSegments.pop().concat(ringSegments.shift())); + segments.push(ringSegments.filter(d3_geo_clipSegmentLength1)); + } + return clip; + }; + } + function d3_geo_clipSegmentLength1(segment) { + return segment.length > 1; + } + function d3_geo_clipBufferListener() { + var lines = [], line; + return { + lineStart: function() { + lines.push(line = []); + }, + point: function(λ, φ) { + line.push([ λ, φ ]); + }, + lineEnd: d3_noop, + buffer: function() { + var buffer = lines; + lines = []; + line = null; + return buffer; + }, + rejoin: function() { + if (lines.length > 1) lines.push(lines.pop().concat(lines.shift())); + } + }; + } + function d3_geo_clipSort(a, b) { + return ((a = a.x)[0] < 0 ? a[1] - halfπ - ε : halfπ - a[1]) - ((b = b.x)[0] < 0 ? b[1] - halfπ - ε : halfπ - b[1]); + } + function d3_geo_pointInPolygon(point, polygon) { + var meridian = point[0], parallel = point[1], meridianNormal = [ Math.sin(meridian), -Math.cos(meridian), 0 ], polarAngle = 0, winding = 0; + d3_geo_areaRingSum.reset(); + for (var i = 0, n = polygon.length; i < n; ++i) { + var ring = polygon[i], m = ring.length; + if (!m) continue; + var point0 = ring[0], λ0 = point0[0], φ0 = point0[1] / 2 + π / 4, sinφ0 = Math.sin(φ0), cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ0), j = 1; + while (true) { + if (j === m) j = 0; + point = ring[j]; + var λ = point[0], φ = point[1] / 2 + π / 4, sinφ = Math.sin(φ), cosφ = Math.cos(φ), dλ = λ - λ0, sdλ = dλ >= 0 ? 1 : -1, adλ = sdλ * dλ, antimeridian = adλ > π, k = sinφ0 * sinφ; + d3_geo_areaRingSum.add(Math.atan2(k * sdλ * Math.sin(adλ), cosφ0 * cosφ + k * Math.cos(adλ))); + polarAngle += antimeridian ? dλ + sdλ * τ : dλ; + if (antimeridian ^ λ0 >= meridian ^ λ >= meridian) { + var arc = d3_geo_cartesianCross(d3_geo_cartesian(point0), d3_geo_cartesian(point)); + d3_geo_cartesianNormalize(arc); + var intersection = d3_geo_cartesianCross(meridianNormal, arc); + d3_geo_cartesianNormalize(intersection); + var φarc = (antimeridian ^ dλ >= 0 ? -1 : 1) * d3_asin(intersection[2]); + if (parallel > φarc || parallel === φarc && (arc[0] || arc[1])) { + winding += antimeridian ^ dλ >= 0 ? 1 : -1; + } + } + if (!j++) break; + λ0 = λ, sinφ0 = sinφ, cosφ0 = cosφ, point0 = point; + } + } + return (polarAngle < -ε || polarAngle < ε && d3_geo_areaRingSum < 0) ^ winding & 1; + } + var d3_geo_clipAntimeridian = d3_geo_clip(d3_true, d3_geo_clipAntimeridianLine, d3_geo_clipAntimeridianInterpolate, [ -π, -π / 2 ]); + function d3_geo_clipAntimeridianLine(listener) { + var λ0 = NaN, φ0 = NaN, sλ0 = NaN, clean; + return { + lineStart: function() { + listener.lineStart(); + clean = 1; + }, + point: function(λ1, φ1) { + var sλ1 = λ1 > 0 ? π : -π, dλ = abs(λ1 - λ0); + if (abs(dλ - π) < ε) { + listener.point(λ0, φ0 = (φ0 + φ1) / 2 > 0 ? halfπ : -halfπ); + listener.point(sλ0, φ0); + listener.lineEnd(); + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(sλ1, φ0); + listener.point(λ1, φ0); + clean = 0; + } else if (sλ0 !== sλ1 && dλ >= π) { + if (abs(λ0 - sλ0) < ε) λ0 -= sλ0 * ε; + if (abs(λ1 - sλ1) < ε) λ1 -= sλ1 * ε; + φ0 = d3_geo_clipAntimeridianIntersect(λ0, φ0, λ1, φ1); + listener.point(sλ0, φ0); + listener.lineEnd(); + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(sλ1, φ0); + clean = 0; + } + listener.point(λ0 = λ1, φ0 = φ1); + sλ0 = sλ1; + }, + lineEnd: function() { + listener.lineEnd(); + λ0 = φ0 = NaN; + }, + clean: function() { + return 2 - clean; + } + }; + } + function d3_geo_clipAntimeridianIntersect(λ0, φ0, λ1, φ1) { + var cosφ0, cosφ1, sinλ0_λ1 = Math.sin(λ0 - λ1); + return abs(sinλ0_λ1) > ε ? Math.atan((Math.sin(φ0) * (cosφ1 = Math.cos(φ1)) * Math.sin(λ1) - Math.sin(φ1) * (cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ0)) * Math.sin(λ0)) / (cosφ0 * cosφ1 * sinλ0_λ1)) : (φ0 + φ1) / 2; + } + function d3_geo_clipAntimeridianInterpolate(from, to, direction, listener) { + var φ; + if (from == null) { + φ = direction * halfπ; + listener.point(-π, φ); + listener.point(0, φ); + listener.point(π, φ); + listener.point(π, 0); + listener.point(π, -φ); + listener.point(0, -φ); + listener.point(-π, -φ); + listener.point(-π, 0); + listener.point(-π, φ); + } else if (abs(from[0] - to[0]) > ε) { + var s = from[0] < to[0] ? π : -π; + φ = direction * s / 2; + listener.point(-s, φ); + listener.point(0, φ); + listener.point(s, φ); + } else { + listener.point(to[0], to[1]); + } + } + function d3_geo_clipCircle(radius) { + var cr = Math.cos(radius), smallRadius = cr > 0, notHemisphere = abs(cr) > ε, interpolate = d3_geo_circleInterpolate(radius, 6 * d3_radians); + return d3_geo_clip(visible, clipLine, interpolate, smallRadius ? [ 0, -radius ] : [ -π, radius - π ]); + function visible(λ, φ) { + return Math.cos(λ) * Math.cos(φ) > cr; + } + function clipLine(listener) { + var point0, c0, v0, v00, clean; + return { + lineStart: function() { + v00 = v0 = false; + clean = 1; + }, + point: function(λ, φ) { + var point1 = [ λ, φ ], point2, v = visible(λ, φ), c = smallRadius ? v ? 0 : code(λ, φ) : v ? code(λ + (λ < 0 ? π : -π), φ) : 0; + if (!point0 && (v00 = v0 = v)) listener.lineStart(); + if (v !== v0) { + point2 = intersect(point0, point1); + if (d3_geo_sphericalEqual(point0, point2) || d3_geo_sphericalEqual(point1, point2)) { + point1[0] += ε; + point1[1] += ε; + v = visible(point1[0], point1[1]); + } + } + if (v !== v0) { + clean = 0; + if (v) { + listener.lineStart(); + point2 = intersect(point1, point0); + listener.point(point2[0], point2[1]); + } else { + point2 = intersect(point0, point1); + listener.point(point2[0], point2[1]); + listener.lineEnd(); + } + point0 = point2; + } else if (notHemisphere && point0 && smallRadius ^ v) { + var t; + if (!(c & c0) && (t = intersect(point1, point0, true))) { + clean = 0; + if (smallRadius) { + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(t[0][0], t[0][1]); + listener.point(t[1][0], t[1][1]); + listener.lineEnd(); + } else { + listener.point(t[1][0], t[1][1]); + listener.lineEnd(); + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(t[0][0], t[0][1]); + } + } + } + if (v && (!point0 || !d3_geo_sphericalEqual(point0, point1))) { + listener.point(point1[0], point1[1]); + } + point0 = point1, v0 = v, c0 = c; + }, + lineEnd: function() { + if (v0) listener.lineEnd(); + point0 = null; + }, + clean: function() { + return clean | (v00 && v0) << 1; + } + }; + } + function intersect(a, b, two) { + var pa = d3_geo_cartesian(a), pb = d3_geo_cartesian(b); + var n1 = [ 1, 0, 0 ], n2 = d3_geo_cartesianCross(pa, pb), n2n2 = d3_geo_cartesianDot(n2, n2), n1n2 = n2[0], determinant = n2n2 - n1n2 * n1n2; + if (!determinant) return !two && a; + var c1 = cr * n2n2 / determinant, c2 = -cr * n1n2 / determinant, n1xn2 = d3_geo_cartesianCross(n1, n2), A = d3_geo_cartesianScale(n1, c1), B = d3_geo_cartesianScale(n2, c2); + d3_geo_cartesianAdd(A, B); + var u = n1xn2, w = d3_geo_cartesianDot(A, u), uu = d3_geo_cartesianDot(u, u), t2 = w * w - uu * (d3_geo_cartesianDot(A, A) - 1); + if (t2 < 0) return; + var t = Math.sqrt(t2), q = d3_geo_cartesianScale(u, (-w - t) / uu); + d3_geo_cartesianAdd(q, A); + q = d3_geo_spherical(q); + if (!two) return q; + var λ0 = a[0], λ1 = b[0], φ0 = a[1], φ1 = b[1], z; + if (λ1 < λ0) z = λ0, λ0 = λ1, λ1 = z; + var δλ = λ1 - λ0, polar = abs(δλ - π) < ε, meridian = polar || δλ < ε; + if (!polar && φ1 < φ0) z = φ0, φ0 = φ1, φ1 = z; + if (meridian ? polar ? φ0 + φ1 > 0 ^ q[1] < (abs(q[0] - λ0) < ε ? φ0 : φ1) : φ0 <= q[1] && q[1] <= φ1 : δλ > π ^ (λ0 <= q[0] && q[0] <= λ1)) { + var q1 = d3_geo_cartesianScale(u, (-w + t) / uu); + d3_geo_cartesianAdd(q1, A); + return [ q, d3_geo_spherical(q1) ]; + } + } + function code(λ, φ) { + var r = smallRadius ? radius : π - radius, code = 0; + if (λ < -r) code |= 1; else if (λ > r) code |= 2; + if (φ < -r) code |= 4; else if (φ > r) code |= 8; + return code; + } + } + function d3_geom_clipLine(x0, y0, x1, y1) { + return function(line) { + var a = line.a, b = line.b, ax = a.x, ay = a.y, bx = b.x, by = b.y, t0 = 0, t1 = 1, dx = bx - ax, dy = by - ay, r; + r = x0 - ax; + if (!dx && r > 0) return; + r /= dx; + if (dx < 0) { + if (r < t0) return; + if (r < t1) t1 = r; + } else if (dx > 0) { + if (r > t1) return; + if (r > t0) t0 = r; + } + r = x1 - ax; + if (!dx && r < 0) return; + r /= dx; + if (dx < 0) { + if (r > t1) return; + if (r > t0) t0 = r; + } else if (dx > 0) { + if (r < t0) return; + if (r < t1) t1 = r; + } + r = y0 - ay; + if (!dy && r > 0) return; + r /= dy; + if (dy < 0) { + if (r < t0) return; + if (r < t1) t1 = r; + } else if (dy > 0) { + if (r > t1) return; + if (r > t0) t0 = r; + } + r = y1 - ay; + if (!dy && r < 0) return; + r /= dy; + if (dy < 0) { + if (r > t1) return; + if (r > t0) t0 = r; + } else if (dy > 0) { + if (r < t0) return; + if (r < t1) t1 = r; + } + if (t0 > 0) line.a = { + x: ax + t0 * dx, + y: ay + t0 * dy + }; + if (t1 < 1) line.b = { + x: ax + t1 * dx, + y: ay + t1 * dy + }; + return line; + }; + } + var d3_geo_clipExtentMAX = 1e9; + d3.geo.clipExtent = function() { + var x0, y0, x1, y1, stream, clip, clipExtent = { + stream: function(output) { + if (stream) stream.valid = false; + stream = clip(output); + stream.valid = true; + return stream; + }, + extent: function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ [ x0, y0 ], [ x1, y1 ] ]; + clip = d3_geo_clipExtent(x0 = +_[0][0], y0 = +_[0][1], x1 = +_[1][0], y1 = +_[1][1]); + if (stream) stream.valid = false, stream = null; + return clipExtent; + } + }; + return clipExtent.extent([ [ 0, 0 ], [ 960, 500 ] ]); + }; + function d3_geo_clipExtent(x0, y0, x1, y1) { + return function(listener) { + var listener_ = listener, bufferListener = d3_geo_clipBufferListener(), clipLine = d3_geom_clipLine(x0, y0, x1, y1), segments, polygon, ring; + var clip = { + point: point, + lineStart: lineStart, + lineEnd: lineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + listener = bufferListener; + segments = []; + polygon = []; + clean = true; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + listener = listener_; + segments = d3.merge(segments); + var clipStartInside = insidePolygon([ x0, y1 ]), inside = clean && clipStartInside, visible = segments.length; + if (inside || visible) { + listener.polygonStart(); + if (inside) { + listener.lineStart(); + interpolate(null, null, 1, listener); + listener.lineEnd(); + } + if (visible) { + d3_geo_clipPolygon(segments, compare, clipStartInside, interpolate, listener); + } + listener.polygonEnd(); + } + segments = polygon = ring = null; + } + }; + function insidePolygon(p) { + var wn = 0, n = polygon.length, y = p[1]; + for (var i = 0; i < n; ++i) { + for (var j = 1, v = polygon[i], m = v.length, a = v[0], b; j < m; ++j) { + b = v[j]; + if (a[1] <= y) { + if (b[1] > y && d3_cross2d(a, b, p) > 0) ++wn; + } else { + if (b[1] <= y && d3_cross2d(a, b, p) < 0) --wn; + } + a = b; + } + } + return wn !== 0; + } + function interpolate(from, to, direction, listener) { + var a = 0, a1 = 0; + if (from == null || (a = corner(from, direction)) !== (a1 = corner(to, direction)) || comparePoints(from, to) < 0 ^ direction > 0) { + do { + listener.point(a === 0 || a === 3 ? x0 : x1, a > 1 ? y1 : y0); + } while ((a = (a + direction + 4) % 4) !== a1); + } else { + listener.point(to[0], to[1]); + } + } + function pointVisible(x, y) { + return x0 <= x && x <= x1 && y0 <= y && y <= y1; + } + function point(x, y) { + if (pointVisible(x, y)) listener.point(x, y); + } + var x__, y__, v__, x_, y_, v_, first, clean; + function lineStart() { + clip.point = linePoint; + if (polygon) polygon.push(ring = []); + first = true; + v_ = false; + x_ = y_ = NaN; + } + function lineEnd() { + if (segments) { + linePoint(x__, y__); + if (v__ && v_) bufferListener.rejoin(); + segments.push(bufferListener.buffer()); + } + clip.point = point; + if (v_) listener.lineEnd(); + } + function linePoint(x, y) { + x = Math.max(-d3_geo_clipExtentMAX, Math.min(d3_geo_clipExtentMAX, x)); + y = Math.max(-d3_geo_clipExtentMAX, Math.min(d3_geo_clipExtentMAX, y)); + var v = pointVisible(x, y); + if (polygon) ring.push([ x, y ]); + if (first) { + x__ = x, y__ = y, v__ = v; + first = false; + if (v) { + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(x, y); + } + } else { + if (v && v_) listener.point(x, y); else { + var l = { + a: { + x: x_, + y: y_ + }, + b: { + x: x, + y: y + } + }; + if (clipLine(l)) { + if (!v_) { + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(l.a.x, l.a.y); + } + listener.point(l.b.x, l.b.y); + if (!v) listener.lineEnd(); + clean = false; + } else if (v) { + listener.lineStart(); + listener.point(x, y); + clean = false; + } + } + } + x_ = x, y_ = y, v_ = v; + } + return clip; + }; + function corner(p, direction) { + return abs(p[0] - x0) < ε ? direction > 0 ? 0 : 3 : abs(p[0] - x1) < ε ? direction > 0 ? 2 : 1 : abs(p[1] - y0) < ε ? direction > 0 ? 1 : 0 : direction > 0 ? 3 : 2; + } + function compare(a, b) { + return comparePoints(a.x, b.x); + } + function comparePoints(a, b) { + var ca = corner(a, 1), cb = corner(b, 1); + return ca !== cb ? ca - cb : ca === 0 ? b[1] - a[1] : ca === 1 ? a[0] - b[0] : ca === 2 ? a[1] - b[1] : b[0] - a[0]; + } + } + function d3_geo_compose(a, b) { + function compose(x, y) { + return x = a(x, y), b(x[0], x[1]); + } + if (a.invert && b.invert) compose.invert = function(x, y) { + return x = b.invert(x, y), x && a.invert(x[0], x[1]); + }; + return compose; + } + function d3_geo_conic(projectAt) { + var φ0 = 0, φ1 = π / 3, m = d3_geo_projectionMutator(projectAt), p = m(φ0, φ1); + p.parallels = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ φ0 / π * 180, φ1 / π * 180 ]; + return m(φ0 = _[0] * π / 180, φ1 = _[1] * π / 180); + }; + return p; + } + function d3_geo_conicEqualArea(φ0, φ1) { + var sinφ0 = Math.sin(φ0), n = (sinφ0 + Math.sin(φ1)) / 2, C = 1 + sinφ0 * (2 * n - sinφ0), ρ0 = Math.sqrt(C) / n; + function forward(λ, φ) { + var ρ = Math.sqrt(C - 2 * n * Math.sin(φ)) / n; + return [ ρ * Math.sin(λ *= n), ρ0 - ρ * Math.cos(λ) ]; + } + forward.invert = function(x, y) { + var ρ0_y = ρ0 - y; + return [ Math.atan2(x, ρ0_y) / n, d3_asin((C - (x * x + ρ0_y * ρ0_y) * n * n) / (2 * n)) ]; + }; + return forward; + } + (d3.geo.conicEqualArea = function() { + return d3_geo_conic(d3_geo_conicEqualArea); + }).raw = d3_geo_conicEqualArea; + d3.geo.albers = function() { + return d3.geo.conicEqualArea().rotate([ 96, 0 ]).center([ -.6, 38.7 ]).parallels([ 29.5, 45.5 ]).scale(1070); + }; + d3.geo.albersUsa = function() { + var lower48 = d3.geo.albers(); + var alaska = d3.geo.conicEqualArea().rotate([ 154, 0 ]).center([ -2, 58.5 ]).parallels([ 55, 65 ]); + var hawaii = d3.geo.conicEqualArea().rotate([ 157, 0 ]).center([ -3, 19.9 ]).parallels([ 8, 18 ]); + var point, pointStream = { + point: function(x, y) { + point = [ x, y ]; + } + }, lower48Point, alaskaPoint, hawaiiPoint; + function albersUsa(coordinates) { + var x = coordinates[0], y = coordinates[1]; + point = null; + (lower48Point(x, y), point) || (alaskaPoint(x, y), point) || hawaiiPoint(x, y); + return point; + } + albersUsa.invert = function(coordinates) { + var k = lower48.scale(), t = lower48.translate(), x = (coordinates[0] - t[0]) / k, y = (coordinates[1] - t[1]) / k; + return (y >= .12 && y < .234 && x >= -.425 && x < -.214 ? alaska : y >= .166 && y < .234 && x >= -.214 && x < -.115 ? hawaii : lower48).invert(coordinates); + }; + albersUsa.stream = function(stream) { + var lower48Stream = lower48.stream(stream), alaskaStream = alaska.stream(stream), hawaiiStream = hawaii.stream(stream); + return { + point: function(x, y) { + lower48Stream.point(x, y); + alaskaStream.point(x, y); + hawaiiStream.point(x, y); + }, + sphere: function() { + lower48Stream.sphere(); + alaskaStream.sphere(); + hawaiiStream.sphere(); + }, + lineStart: function() { + lower48Stream.lineStart(); + alaskaStream.lineStart(); + hawaiiStream.lineStart(); + }, + lineEnd: function() { + lower48Stream.lineEnd(); + alaskaStream.lineEnd(); + hawaiiStream.lineEnd(); + }, + polygonStart: function() { + lower48Stream.polygonStart(); + alaskaStream.polygonStart(); + hawaiiStream.polygonStart(); + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + lower48Stream.polygonEnd(); + alaskaStream.polygonEnd(); + hawaiiStream.polygonEnd(); + } + }; + }; + albersUsa.precision = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return lower48.precision(); + lower48.precision(_); + alaska.precision(_); + hawaii.precision(_); + return albersUsa; + }; + albersUsa.scale = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return lower48.scale(); + lower48.scale(_); + alaska.scale(_ * .35); + hawaii.scale(_); + return albersUsa.translate(lower48.translate()); + }; + albersUsa.translate = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return lower48.translate(); + var k = lower48.scale(), x = +_[0], y = +_[1]; + lower48Point = lower48.translate(_).clipExtent([ [ x - .455 * k, y - .238 * k ], [ x + .455 * k, y + .238 * k ] ]).stream(pointStream).point; + alaskaPoint = alaska.translate([ x - .307 * k, y + .201 * k ]).clipExtent([ [ x - .425 * k + ε, y + .12 * k + ε ], [ x - .214 * k - ε, y + .234 * k - ε ] ]).stream(pointStream).point; + hawaiiPoint = hawaii.translate([ x - .205 * k, y + .212 * k ]).clipExtent([ [ x - .214 * k + ε, y + .166 * k + ε ], [ x - .115 * k - ε, y + .234 * k - ε ] ]).stream(pointStream).point; + return albersUsa; + }; + return albersUsa.scale(1070); + }; + var d3_geo_pathAreaSum, d3_geo_pathAreaPolygon, d3_geo_pathArea = { + point: d3_noop, + lineStart: d3_noop, + lineEnd: d3_noop, + polygonStart: function() { + d3_geo_pathAreaPolygon = 0; + d3_geo_pathArea.lineStart = d3_geo_pathAreaRingStart; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + d3_geo_pathArea.lineStart = d3_geo_pathArea.lineEnd = d3_geo_pathArea.point = d3_noop; + d3_geo_pathAreaSum += abs(d3_geo_pathAreaPolygon / 2); + } + }; + function d3_geo_pathAreaRingStart() { + var x00, y00, x0, y0; + d3_geo_pathArea.point = function(x, y) { + d3_geo_pathArea.point = nextPoint; + x00 = x0 = x, y00 = y0 = y; + }; + function nextPoint(x, y) { + d3_geo_pathAreaPolygon += y0 * x - x0 * y; + x0 = x, y0 = y; + } + d3_geo_pathArea.lineEnd = function() { + nextPoint(x00, y00); + }; + } + var d3_geo_pathBoundsX0, d3_geo_pathBoundsY0, d3_geo_pathBoundsX1, d3_geo_pathBoundsY1; + var d3_geo_pathBounds = { + point: d3_geo_pathBoundsPoint, + lineStart: d3_noop, + lineEnd: d3_noop, + polygonStart: d3_noop, + polygonEnd: d3_noop + }; + function d3_geo_pathBoundsPoint(x, y) { + if (x < d3_geo_pathBoundsX0) d3_geo_pathBoundsX0 = x; + if (x > d3_geo_pathBoundsX1) d3_geo_pathBoundsX1 = x; + if (y < d3_geo_pathBoundsY0) d3_geo_pathBoundsY0 = y; + if (y > d3_geo_pathBoundsY1) d3_geo_pathBoundsY1 = y; + } + function d3_geo_pathBuffer() { + var pointCircle = d3_geo_pathBufferCircle(4.5), buffer = []; + var stream = { + point: point, + lineStart: function() { + stream.point = pointLineStart; + }, + lineEnd: lineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + stream.lineEnd = lineEndPolygon; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + stream.lineEnd = lineEnd; + stream.point = point; + }, + pointRadius: function(_) { + pointCircle = d3_geo_pathBufferCircle(_); + return stream; + }, + result: function() { + if (buffer.length) { + var result = buffer.join(""); + buffer = []; + return result; + } + } + }; + function point(x, y) { + buffer.push("M", x, ",", y, pointCircle); + } + function pointLineStart(x, y) { + buffer.push("M", x, ",", y); + stream.point = pointLine; + } + function pointLine(x, y) { + buffer.push("L", x, ",", y); + } + function lineEnd() { + stream.point = point; + } + function lineEndPolygon() { + buffer.push("Z"); + } + return stream; + } + function d3_geo_pathBufferCircle(radius) { + return "m0," + radius + "a" + radius + "," + radius + " 0 1,1 0," + -2 * radius + "a" + radius + "," + radius + " 0 1,1 0," + 2 * radius + "z"; + } + var d3_geo_pathCentroid = { + point: d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint, + lineStart: d3_geo_pathCentroidLineStart, + lineEnd: d3_geo_pathCentroidLineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + d3_geo_pathCentroid.lineStart = d3_geo_pathCentroidRingStart; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + d3_geo_pathCentroid.point = d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint; + d3_geo_pathCentroid.lineStart = d3_geo_pathCentroidLineStart; + d3_geo_pathCentroid.lineEnd = d3_geo_pathCentroidLineEnd; + } + }; + function d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint(x, y) { + d3_geo_centroidX0 += x; + d3_geo_centroidY0 += y; + ++d3_geo_centroidZ0; + } + function d3_geo_pathCentroidLineStart() { + var x0, y0; + d3_geo_pathCentroid.point = function(x, y) { + d3_geo_pathCentroid.point = nextPoint; + d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint(x0 = x, y0 = y); + }; + function nextPoint(x, y) { + var dx = x - x0, dy = y - y0, z = Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy); + d3_geo_centroidX1 += z * (x0 + x) / 2; + d3_geo_centroidY1 += z * (y0 + y) / 2; + d3_geo_centroidZ1 += z; + d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint(x0 = x, y0 = y); + } + } + function d3_geo_pathCentroidLineEnd() { + d3_geo_pathCentroid.point = d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint; + } + function d3_geo_pathCentroidRingStart() { + var x00, y00, x0, y0; + d3_geo_pathCentroid.point = function(x, y) { + d3_geo_pathCentroid.point = nextPoint; + d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint(x00 = x0 = x, y00 = y0 = y); + }; + function nextPoint(x, y) { + var dx = x - x0, dy = y - y0, z = Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy); + d3_geo_centroidX1 += z * (x0 + x) / 2; + d3_geo_centroidY1 += z * (y0 + y) / 2; + d3_geo_centroidZ1 += z; + z = y0 * x - x0 * y; + d3_geo_centroidX2 += z * (x0 + x); + d3_geo_centroidY2 += z * (y0 + y); + d3_geo_centroidZ2 += z * 3; + d3_geo_pathCentroidPoint(x0 = x, y0 = y); + } + d3_geo_pathCentroid.lineEnd = function() { + nextPoint(x00, y00); + }; + } + function d3_geo_pathContext(context) { + var pointRadius = 4.5; + var stream = { + point: point, + lineStart: function() { + stream.point = pointLineStart; + }, + lineEnd: lineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + stream.lineEnd = lineEndPolygon; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + stream.lineEnd = lineEnd; + stream.point = point; + }, + pointRadius: function(_) { + pointRadius = _; + return stream; + }, + result: d3_noop + }; + function point(x, y) { + context.moveTo(x, y); + context.arc(x, y, pointRadius, 0, τ); + } + function pointLineStart(x, y) { + context.moveTo(x, y); + stream.point = pointLine; + } + function pointLine(x, y) { + context.lineTo(x, y); + } + function lineEnd() { + stream.point = point; + } + function lineEndPolygon() { + context.closePath(); + } + return stream; + } + function d3_geo_resample(project) { + var δ2 = .5, cosMinDistance = Math.cos(30 * d3_radians), maxDepth = 16; + function resample(stream) { + return (maxDepth ? resampleRecursive : resampleNone)(stream); + } + function resampleNone(stream) { + return d3_geo_transformPoint(stream, function(x, y) { + x = project(x, y); + stream.point(x[0], x[1]); + }); + } + function resampleRecursive(stream) { + var λ00, φ00, x00, y00, a00, b00, c00, λ0, x0, y0, a0, b0, c0; + var resample = { + point: point, + lineStart: lineStart, + lineEnd: lineEnd, + polygonStart: function() { + stream.polygonStart(); + resample.lineStart = ringStart; + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + stream.polygonEnd(); + resample.lineStart = lineStart; + } + }; + function point(x, y) { + x = project(x, y); + stream.point(x[0], x[1]); + } + function lineStart() { + x0 = NaN; + resample.point = linePoint; + stream.lineStart(); + } + function linePoint(λ, φ) { + var c = d3_geo_cartesian([ λ, φ ]), p = project(λ, φ); + resampleLineTo(x0, y0, λ0, a0, b0, c0, x0 = p[0], y0 = p[1], λ0 = λ, a0 = c[0], b0 = c[1], c0 = c[2], maxDepth, stream); + stream.point(x0, y0); + } + function lineEnd() { + resample.point = point; + stream.lineEnd(); + } + function ringStart() { + lineStart(); + resample.point = ringPoint; + resample.lineEnd = ringEnd; + } + function ringPoint(λ, φ) { + linePoint(λ00 = λ, φ00 = φ), x00 = x0, y00 = y0, a00 = a0, b00 = b0, c00 = c0; + resample.point = linePoint; + } + function ringEnd() { + resampleLineTo(x0, y0, λ0, a0, b0, c0, x00, y00, λ00, a00, b00, c00, maxDepth, stream); + resample.lineEnd = lineEnd; + lineEnd(); + } + return resample; + } + function resampleLineTo(x0, y0, λ0, a0, b0, c0, x1, y1, λ1, a1, b1, c1, depth, stream) { + var dx = x1 - x0, dy = y1 - y0, d2 = dx * dx + dy * dy; + if (d2 > 4 * δ2 && depth--) { + var a = a0 + a1, b = b0 + b1, c = c0 + c1, m = Math.sqrt(a * a + b * b + c * c), φ2 = Math.asin(c /= m), λ2 = abs(abs(c) - 1) < ε || abs(λ0 - λ1) < ε ? (λ0 + λ1) / 2 : Math.atan2(b, a), p = project(λ2, φ2), x2 = p[0], y2 = p[1], dx2 = x2 - x0, dy2 = y2 - y0, dz = dy * dx2 - dx * dy2; + if (dz * dz / d2 > δ2 || abs((dx * dx2 + dy * dy2) / d2 - .5) > .3 || a0 * a1 + b0 * b1 + c0 * c1 < cosMinDistance) { + resampleLineTo(x0, y0, λ0, a0, b0, c0, x2, y2, λ2, a /= m, b /= m, c, depth, stream); + stream.point(x2, y2); + resampleLineTo(x2, y2, λ2, a, b, c, x1, y1, λ1, a1, b1, c1, depth, stream); + } + } + } + resample.precision = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return Math.sqrt(δ2); + maxDepth = (δ2 = _ * _) > 0 && 16; + return resample; + }; + return resample; + } + d3.geo.path = function() { + var pointRadius = 4.5, projection, context, projectStream, contextStream, cacheStream; + function path(object) { + if (object) { + if (typeof pointRadius === "function") contextStream.pointRadius(+pointRadius.apply(this, arguments)); + if (!cacheStream || !cacheStream.valid) cacheStream = projectStream(contextStream); + d3.geo.stream(object, cacheStream); + } + return contextStream.result(); + } + path.area = function(object) { + d3_geo_pathAreaSum = 0; + d3.geo.stream(object, projectStream(d3_geo_pathArea)); + return d3_geo_pathAreaSum; + }; + path.centroid = function(object) { + d3_geo_centroidX0 = d3_geo_centroidY0 = d3_geo_centroidZ0 = d3_geo_centroidX1 = d3_geo_centroidY1 = d3_geo_centroidZ1 = d3_geo_centroidX2 = d3_geo_centroidY2 = d3_geo_centroidZ2 = 0; + d3.geo.stream(object, projectStream(d3_geo_pathCentroid)); + return d3_geo_centroidZ2 ? [ d3_geo_centroidX2 / d3_geo_centroidZ2, d3_geo_centroidY2 / d3_geo_centroidZ2 ] : d3_geo_centroidZ1 ? [ d3_geo_centroidX1 / d3_geo_centroidZ1, d3_geo_centroidY1 / d3_geo_centroidZ1 ] : d3_geo_centroidZ0 ? [ d3_geo_centroidX0 / d3_geo_centroidZ0, d3_geo_centroidY0 / d3_geo_centroidZ0 ] : [ NaN, NaN ]; + }; + path.bounds = function(object) { + d3_geo_pathBoundsX1 = d3_geo_pathBoundsY1 = -(d3_geo_pathBoundsX0 = d3_geo_pathBoundsY0 = Infinity); + d3.geo.stream(object, projectStream(d3_geo_pathBounds)); + return [ [ d3_geo_pathBoundsX0, d3_geo_pathBoundsY0 ], [ d3_geo_pathBoundsX1, d3_geo_pathBoundsY1 ] ]; + }; + path.projection = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return projection; + projectStream = (projection = _) ? _.stream || d3_geo_pathProjectStream(_) : d3_identity; + return reset(); + }; + path.context = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return context; + contextStream = (context = _) == null ? new d3_geo_pathBuffer() : new d3_geo_pathContext(_); + if (typeof pointRadius !== "function") contextStream.pointRadius(pointRadius); + return reset(); + }; + path.pointRadius = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return pointRadius; + pointRadius = typeof _ === "function" ? _ : (contextStream.pointRadius(+_), +_); + return path; + }; + function reset() { + cacheStream = null; + return path; + } + return path.projection(d3.geo.albersUsa()).context(null); + }; + function d3_geo_pathProjectStream(project) { + var resample = d3_geo_resample(function(x, y) { + return project([ x * d3_degrees, y * d3_degrees ]); + }); + return function(stream) { + return d3_geo_projectionRadians(resample(stream)); + }; + } + d3.geo.transform = function(methods) { + return { + stream: function(stream) { + var transform = new d3_geo_transform(stream); + for (var k in methods) transform[k] = methods[k]; + return transform; + } + }; + }; + function d3_geo_transform(stream) { + this.stream = stream; + } + d3_geo_transform.prototype = { + point: function(x, y) { + this.stream.point(x, y); + }, + sphere: function() { + this.stream.sphere(); + }, + lineStart: function() { + this.stream.lineStart(); + }, + lineEnd: function() { + this.stream.lineEnd(); + }, + polygonStart: function() { + this.stream.polygonStart(); + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + this.stream.polygonEnd(); + } + }; + function d3_geo_transformPoint(stream, point) { + return { + point: point, + sphere: function() { + stream.sphere(); + }, + lineStart: function() { + stream.lineStart(); + }, + lineEnd: function() { + stream.lineEnd(); + }, + polygonStart: function() { + stream.polygonStart(); + }, + polygonEnd: function() { + stream.polygonEnd(); + } + }; + } + d3.geo.projection = d3_geo_projection; + d3.geo.projectionMutator = d3_geo_projectionMutator; + function d3_geo_projection(project) { + return d3_geo_projectionMutator(function() { + return project; + })(); + } + function d3_geo_projectionMutator(projectAt) { + var project, rotate, projectRotate, projectResample = d3_geo_resample(function(x, y) { + x = project(x, y); + return [ x[0] * k + δx, δy - x[1] * k ]; + }), k = 150, x = 480, y = 250, λ = 0, φ = 0, δλ = 0, δφ = 0, δγ = 0, δx, δy, preclip = d3_geo_clipAntimeridian, postclip = d3_identity, clipAngle = null, clipExtent = null, stream; + function projection(point) { + point = projectRotate(point[0] * d3_radians, point[1] * d3_radians); + return [ point[0] * k + δx, δy - point[1] * k ]; + } + function invert(point) { + point = projectRotate.invert((point[0] - δx) / k, (δy - point[1]) / k); + return point && [ point[0] * d3_degrees, point[1] * d3_degrees ]; + } + projection.stream = function(output) { + if (stream) stream.valid = false; + stream = d3_geo_projectionRadians(preclip(rotate, projectResample(postclip(output)))); + stream.valid = true; + return stream; + }; + projection.clipAngle = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return clipAngle; + preclip = _ == null ? (clipAngle = _, d3_geo_clipAntimeridian) : d3_geo_clipCircle((clipAngle = +_) * d3_radians); + return invalidate(); + }; + projection.clipExtent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return clipExtent; + clipExtent = _; + postclip = _ ? d3_geo_clipExtent(_[0][0], _[0][1], _[1][0], _[1][1]) : d3_identity; + return invalidate(); + }; + projection.scale = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return k; + k = +_; + return reset(); + }; + projection.translate = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ x, y ]; + x = +_[0]; + y = +_[1]; + return reset(); + }; + projection.center = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ λ * d3_degrees, φ * d3_degrees ]; + λ = _[0] % 360 * d3_radians; + φ = _[1] % 360 * d3_radians; + return reset(); + }; + projection.rotate = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ δλ * d3_degrees, δφ * d3_degrees, δγ * d3_degrees ]; + δλ = _[0] % 360 * d3_radians; + δφ = _[1] % 360 * d3_radians; + δγ = _.length > 2 ? _[2] % 360 * d3_radians : 0; + return reset(); + }; + d3.rebind(projection, projectResample, "precision"); + function reset() { + projectRotate = d3_geo_compose(rotate = d3_geo_rotation(δλ, δφ, δγ), project); + var center = project(λ, φ); + δx = x - center[0] * k; + δy = y + center[1] * k; + return invalidate(); + } + function invalidate() { + if (stream) stream.valid = false, stream = null; + return projection; + } + return function() { + project = projectAt.apply(this, arguments); + projection.invert = project.invert && invert; + return reset(); + }; + } + function d3_geo_projectionRadians(stream) { + return d3_geo_transformPoint(stream, function(x, y) { + stream.point(x * d3_radians, y * d3_radians); + }); + } + function d3_geo_equirectangular(λ, φ) { + return [ λ, φ ]; + } + (d3.geo.equirectangular = function() { + return d3_geo_projection(d3_geo_equirectangular); + }).raw = d3_geo_equirectangular.invert = d3_geo_equirectangular; + d3.geo.rotation = function(rotate) { + rotate = d3_geo_rotation(rotate[0] % 360 * d3_radians, rotate[1] * d3_radians, rotate.length > 2 ? rotate[2] * d3_radians : 0); + function forward(coordinates) { + coordinates = rotate(coordinates[0] * d3_radians, coordinates[1] * d3_radians); + return coordinates[0] *= d3_degrees, coordinates[1] *= d3_degrees, coordinates; + } + forward.invert = function(coordinates) { + coordinates = rotate.invert(coordinates[0] * d3_radians, coordinates[1] * d3_radians); + return coordinates[0] *= d3_degrees, coordinates[1] *= d3_degrees, coordinates; + }; + return forward; + }; + function d3_geo_identityRotation(λ, φ) { + return [ λ > π ? λ - τ : λ < -π ? λ + τ : λ, φ ]; + } + d3_geo_identityRotation.invert = d3_geo_equirectangular; + function d3_geo_rotation(δλ, δφ, δγ) { + return δλ ? δφ || δγ ? d3_geo_compose(d3_geo_rotationλ(δλ), d3_geo_rotationφγ(δφ, δγ)) : d3_geo_rotationλ(δλ) : δφ || δγ ? d3_geo_rotationφγ(δφ, δγ) : d3_geo_identityRotation; + } + function d3_geo_forwardRotationλ(δλ) { + return function(λ, φ) { + return λ += δλ, [ λ > π ? λ - τ : λ < -π ? λ + τ : λ, φ ]; + }; + } + function d3_geo_rotationλ(δλ) { + var rotation = d3_geo_forwardRotationλ(δλ); + rotation.invert = d3_geo_forwardRotationλ(-δλ); + return rotation; + } + function d3_geo_rotationφγ(δφ, δγ) { + var cosδφ = Math.cos(δφ), sinδφ = Math.sin(δφ), cosδγ = Math.cos(δγ), sinδγ = Math.sin(δγ); + function rotation(λ, φ) { + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ), x = Math.cos(λ) * cosφ, y = Math.sin(λ) * cosφ, z = Math.sin(φ), k = z * cosδφ + x * sinδφ; + return [ Math.atan2(y * cosδγ - k * sinδγ, x * cosδφ - z * sinδφ), d3_asin(k * cosδγ + y * sinδγ) ]; + } + rotation.invert = function(λ, φ) { + var cosφ = Math.cos(φ), x = Math.cos(λ) * cosφ, y = Math.sin(λ) * cosφ, z = Math.sin(φ), k = z * cosδγ - y * sinδγ; + return [ Math.atan2(y * cosδγ + z * sinδγ, x * cosδφ + k * sinδφ), d3_asin(k * cosδφ - x * sinδφ) ]; + }; + return rotation; + } + d3.geo.circle = function() { + var origin = [ 0, 0 ], angle, precision = 6, interpolate; + function circle() { + var center = typeof origin === "function" ? origin.apply(this, arguments) : origin, rotate = d3_geo_rotation(-center[0] * d3_radians, -center[1] * d3_radians, 0).invert, ring = []; + interpolate(null, null, 1, { + point: function(x, y) { + ring.push(x = rotate(x, y)); + x[0] *= d3_degrees, x[1] *= d3_degrees; + } + }); + return { + type: "Polygon", + coordinates: [ ring ] + }; + } + circle.origin = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return origin; + origin = x; + return circle; + }; + circle.angle = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return angle; + interpolate = d3_geo_circleInterpolate((angle = +x) * d3_radians, precision * d3_radians); + return circle; + }; + circle.precision = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return precision; + interpolate = d3_geo_circleInterpolate(angle * d3_radians, (precision = +_) * d3_radians); + return circle; + }; + return circle.angle(90); + }; + function d3_geo_circleInterpolate(radius, precision) { + var cr = Math.cos(radius), sr = Math.sin(radius); + return function(from, to, direction, listener) { + var step = direction * precision; + if (from != null) { + from = d3_geo_circleAngle(cr, from); + to = d3_geo_circleAngle(cr, to); + if (direction > 0 ? from < to : from > to) from += direction * τ; + } else { + from = radius + direction * τ; + to = radius - .5 * step; + } + for (var point, t = from; direction > 0 ? t > to : t < to; t -= step) { + listener.point((point = d3_geo_spherical([ cr, -sr * Math.cos(t), -sr * Math.sin(t) ]))[0], point[1]); + } + }; + } + function d3_geo_circleAngle(cr, point) { + var a = d3_geo_cartesian(point); + a[0] -= cr; + d3_geo_cartesianNormalize(a); + var angle = d3_acos(-a[1]); + return ((-a[2] < 0 ? -angle : angle) + 2 * Math.PI - ε) % (2 * Math.PI); + } + d3.geo.distance = function(a, b) { + var Δλ = (b[0] - a[0]) * d3_radians, φ0 = a[1] * d3_radians, φ1 = b[1] * d3_radians, sinΔλ = Math.sin(Δλ), cosΔλ = Math.cos(Δλ), sinφ0 = Math.sin(φ0), cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ0), sinφ1 = Math.sin(φ1), cosφ1 = Math.cos(φ1), t; + return Math.atan2(Math.sqrt((t = cosφ1 * sinΔλ) * t + (t = cosφ0 * sinφ1 - sinφ0 * cosφ1 * cosΔλ) * t), sinφ0 * sinφ1 + cosφ0 * cosφ1 * cosΔλ); + }; + d3.geo.graticule = function() { + var x1, x0, X1, X0, y1, y0, Y1, Y0, dx = 10, dy = dx, DX = 90, DY = 360, x, y, X, Y, precision = 2.5; + function graticule() { + return { + type: "MultiLineString", + coordinates: lines() + }; + } + function lines() { + return d3.range(Math.ceil(X0 / DX) * DX, X1, DX).map(X).concat(d3.range(Math.ceil(Y0 / DY) * DY, Y1, DY).map(Y)).concat(d3.range(Math.ceil(x0 / dx) * dx, x1, dx).filter(function(x) { + return abs(x % DX) > ε; + }).map(x)).concat(d3.range(Math.ceil(y0 / dy) * dy, y1, dy).filter(function(y) { + return abs(y % DY) > ε; + }).map(y)); + } + graticule.lines = function() { + return lines().map(function(coordinates) { + return { + type: "LineString", + coordinates: coordinates + }; + }); + }; + graticule.outline = function() { + return { + type: "Polygon", + coordinates: [ X(X0).concat(Y(Y1).slice(1), X(X1).reverse().slice(1), Y(Y0).reverse().slice(1)) ] + }; + }; + graticule.extent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return graticule.minorExtent(); + return graticule.majorExtent(_).minorExtent(_); + }; + graticule.majorExtent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ [ X0, Y0 ], [ X1, Y1 ] ]; + X0 = +_[0][0], X1 = +_[1][0]; + Y0 = +_[0][1], Y1 = +_[1][1]; + if (X0 > X1) _ = X0, X0 = X1, X1 = _; + if (Y0 > Y1) _ = Y0, Y0 = Y1, Y1 = _; + return graticule.precision(precision); + }; + graticule.minorExtent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ [ x0, y0 ], [ x1, y1 ] ]; + x0 = +_[0][0], x1 = +_[1][0]; + y0 = +_[0][1], y1 = +_[1][1]; + if (x0 > x1) _ = x0, x0 = x1, x1 = _; + if (y0 > y1) _ = y0, y0 = y1, y1 = _; + return graticule.precision(precision); + }; + graticule.step = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return graticule.minorStep(); + return graticule.majorStep(_).minorStep(_); + }; + graticule.majorStep = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ DX, DY ]; + DX = +_[0], DY = +_[1]; + return graticule; + }; + graticule.minorStep = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ dx, dy ]; + dx = +_[0], dy = +_[1]; + return graticule; + }; + graticule.precision = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return precision; + precision = +_; + x = d3_geo_graticuleX(y0, y1, 90); + y = d3_geo_graticuleY(x0, x1, precision); + X = d3_geo_graticuleX(Y0, Y1, 90); + Y = d3_geo_graticuleY(X0, X1, precision); + return graticule; + }; + return graticule.majorExtent([ [ -180, -90 + ε ], [ 180, 90 - ε ] ]).minorExtent([ [ -180, -80 - ε ], [ 180, 80 + ε ] ]); + }; + function d3_geo_graticuleX(y0, y1, dy) { + var y = d3.range(y0, y1 - ε, dy).concat(y1); + return function(x) { + return y.map(function(y) { + return [ x, y ]; + }); + }; + } + function d3_geo_graticuleY(x0, x1, dx) { + var x = d3.range(x0, x1 - ε, dx).concat(x1); + return function(y) { + return x.map(function(x) { + return [ x, y ]; + }); + }; + } + function d3_source(d) { + return d.source; + } + function d3_target(d) { + return d.target; + } + d3.geo.greatArc = function() { + var source = d3_source, source_, target = d3_target, target_; + function greatArc() { + return { + type: "LineString", + coordinates: [ source_ || source.apply(this, arguments), target_ || target.apply(this, arguments) ] + }; + } + greatArc.distance = function() { + return d3.geo.distance(source_ || source.apply(this, arguments), target_ || target.apply(this, arguments)); + }; + greatArc.source = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return source; + source = _, source_ = typeof _ === "function" ? null : _; + return greatArc; + }; + greatArc.target = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return target; + target = _, target_ = typeof _ === "function" ? null : _; + return greatArc; + }; + greatArc.precision = function() { + return arguments.length ? greatArc : 0; + }; + return greatArc; + }; + d3.geo.interpolate = function(source, target) { + return d3_geo_interpolate(source[0] * d3_radians, source[1] * d3_radians, target[0] * d3_radians, target[1] * d3_radians); + }; + function d3_geo_interpolate(x0, y0, x1, y1) { + var cy0 = Math.cos(y0), sy0 = Math.sin(y0), cy1 = Math.cos(y1), sy1 = Math.sin(y1), kx0 = cy0 * Math.cos(x0), ky0 = cy0 * Math.sin(x0), kx1 = cy1 * Math.cos(x1), ky1 = cy1 * Math.sin(x1), d = 2 * Math.asin(Math.sqrt(d3_haversin(y1 - y0) + cy0 * cy1 * d3_haversin(x1 - x0))), k = 1 / Math.sin(d); + var interpolate = d ? function(t) { + var B = Math.sin(t *= d) * k, A = Math.sin(d - t) * k, x = A * kx0 + B * kx1, y = A * ky0 + B * ky1, z = A * sy0 + B * sy1; + return [ Math.atan2(y, x) * d3_degrees, Math.atan2(z, Math.sqrt(x * x + y * y)) * d3_degrees ]; + } : function() { + return [ x0 * d3_degrees, y0 * d3_degrees ]; + }; + interpolate.distance = d; + return interpolate; + } + d3.geo.length = function(object) { + d3_geo_lengthSum = 0; + d3.geo.stream(object, d3_geo_length); + return d3_geo_lengthSum; + }; + var d3_geo_lengthSum; + var d3_geo_length = { + sphere: d3_noop, + point: d3_noop, + lineStart: d3_geo_lengthLineStart, + lineEnd: d3_noop, + polygonStart: d3_noop, + polygonEnd: d3_noop + }; + function d3_geo_lengthLineStart() { + var λ0, sinφ0, cosφ0; + d3_geo_length.point = function(λ, φ) { + λ0 = λ * d3_radians, sinφ0 = Math.sin(φ *= d3_radians), cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ); + d3_geo_length.point = nextPoint; + }; + d3_geo_length.lineEnd = function() { + d3_geo_length.point = d3_geo_length.lineEnd = d3_noop; + }; + function nextPoint(λ, φ) { + var sinφ = Math.sin(φ *= d3_radians), cosφ = Math.cos(φ), t = abs((λ *= d3_radians) - λ0), cosΔλ = Math.cos(t); + d3_geo_lengthSum += Math.atan2(Math.sqrt((t = cosφ * Math.sin(t)) * t + (t = cosφ0 * sinφ - sinφ0 * cosφ * cosΔλ) * t), sinφ0 * sinφ + cosφ0 * cosφ * cosΔλ); + λ0 = λ, sinφ0 = sinφ, cosφ0 = cosφ; + } + } + function d3_geo_azimuthal(scale, angle) { + function azimuthal(λ, φ) { + var cosλ = Math.cos(λ), cosφ = Math.cos(φ), k = scale(cosλ * cosφ); + return [ k * cosφ * Math.sin(λ), k * Math.sin(φ) ]; + } + azimuthal.invert = function(x, y) { + var ρ = Math.sqrt(x * x + y * y), c = angle(ρ), sinc = Math.sin(c), cosc = Math.cos(c); + return [ Math.atan2(x * sinc, ρ * cosc), Math.asin(ρ && y * sinc / ρ) ]; + }; + return azimuthal; + } + var d3_geo_azimuthalEqualArea = d3_geo_azimuthal(function(cosλcosφ) { + return Math.sqrt(2 / (1 + cosλcosφ)); + }, function(ρ) { + return 2 * Math.asin(ρ / 2); + }); + (d3.geo.azimuthalEqualArea = function() { + return d3_geo_projection(d3_geo_azimuthalEqualArea); + }).raw = d3_geo_azimuthalEqualArea; + var d3_geo_azimuthalEquidistant = d3_geo_azimuthal(function(cosλcosφ) { + var c = Math.acos(cosλcosφ); + return c && c / Math.sin(c); + }, d3_identity); + (d3.geo.azimuthalEquidistant = function() { + return d3_geo_projection(d3_geo_azimuthalEquidistant); + }).raw = d3_geo_azimuthalEquidistant; + function d3_geo_conicConformal(φ0, φ1) { + var cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ0), t = function(φ) { + return Math.tan(π / 4 + φ / 2); + }, n = φ0 === φ1 ? Math.sin(φ0) : Math.log(cosφ0 / Math.cos(φ1)) / Math.log(t(φ1) / t(φ0)), F = cosφ0 * Math.pow(t(φ0), n) / n; + if (!n) return d3_geo_mercator; + function forward(λ, φ) { + if (F > 0) { + if (φ < -halfπ + ε) φ = -halfπ + ε; + } else { + if (φ > halfπ - ε) φ = halfπ - ε; + } + var ρ = F / Math.pow(t(φ), n); + return [ ρ * Math.sin(n * λ), F - ρ * Math.cos(n * λ) ]; + } + forward.invert = function(x, y) { + var ρ0_y = F - y, ρ = d3_sgn(n) * Math.sqrt(x * x + ρ0_y * ρ0_y); + return [ Math.atan2(x, ρ0_y) / n, 2 * Math.atan(Math.pow(F / ρ, 1 / n)) - halfπ ]; + }; + return forward; + } + (d3.geo.conicConformal = function() { + return d3_geo_conic(d3_geo_conicConformal); + }).raw = d3_geo_conicConformal; + function d3_geo_conicEquidistant(φ0, φ1) { + var cosφ0 = Math.cos(φ0), n = φ0 === φ1 ? Math.sin(φ0) : (cosφ0 - Math.cos(φ1)) / (φ1 - φ0), G = cosφ0 / n + φ0; + if (abs(n) < ε) return d3_geo_equirectangular; + function forward(λ, φ) { + var ρ = G - φ; + return [ ρ * Math.sin(n * λ), G - ρ * Math.cos(n * λ) ]; + } + forward.invert = function(x, y) { + var ρ0_y = G - y; + return [ Math.atan2(x, ρ0_y) / n, G - d3_sgn(n) * Math.sqrt(x * x + ρ0_y * ρ0_y) ]; + }; + return forward; + } + (d3.geo.conicEquidistant = function() { + return d3_geo_conic(d3_geo_conicEquidistant); + }).raw = d3_geo_conicEquidistant; + var d3_geo_gnomonic = d3_geo_azimuthal(function(cosλcosφ) { + return 1 / cosλcosφ; + }, Math.atan); + (d3.geo.gnomonic = function() { + return d3_geo_projection(d3_geo_gnomonic); + }).raw = d3_geo_gnomonic; + function d3_geo_mercator(λ, φ) { + return [ λ, Math.log(Math.tan(π / 4 + φ / 2)) ]; + } + d3_geo_mercator.invert = function(x, y) { + return [ x, 2 * Math.atan(Math.exp(y)) - halfπ ]; + }; + function d3_geo_mercatorProjection(project) { + var m = d3_geo_projection(project), scale = m.scale, translate = m.translate, clipExtent = m.clipExtent, clipAuto; + m.scale = function() { + var v = scale.apply(m, arguments); + return v === m ? clipAuto ? m.clipExtent(null) : m : v; + }; + m.translate = function() { + var v = translate.apply(m, arguments); + return v === m ? clipAuto ? m.clipExtent(null) : m : v; + }; + m.clipExtent = function(_) { + var v = clipExtent.apply(m, arguments); + if (v === m) { + if (clipAuto = _ == null) { + var k = π * scale(), t = translate(); + clipExtent([ [ t[0] - k, t[1] - k ], [ t[0] + k, t[1] + k ] ]); + } + } else if (clipAuto) { + v = null; + } + return v; + }; + return m.clipExtent(null); + } + (d3.geo.mercator = function() { + return d3_geo_mercatorProjection(d3_geo_mercator); + }).raw = d3_geo_mercator; + var d3_geo_orthographic = d3_geo_azimuthal(function() { + return 1; + }, Math.asin); + (d3.geo.orthographic = function() { + return d3_geo_projection(d3_geo_orthographic); + }).raw = d3_geo_orthographic; + var d3_geo_stereographic = d3_geo_azimuthal(function(cosλcosφ) { + return 1 / (1 + cosλcosφ); + }, function(ρ) { + return 2 * Math.atan(ρ); + }); + (d3.geo.stereographic = function() { + return d3_geo_projection(d3_geo_stereographic); + }).raw = d3_geo_stereographic; + function d3_geo_transverseMercator(λ, φ) { + return [ Math.log(Math.tan(π / 4 + φ / 2)), -λ ]; + } + d3_geo_transverseMercator.invert = function(x, y) { + return [ -y, 2 * Math.atan(Math.exp(x)) - halfπ ]; + }; + (d3.geo.transverseMercator = function() { + var projection = d3_geo_mercatorProjection(d3_geo_transverseMercator), center = projection.center, rotate = projection.rotate; + projection.center = function(_) { + return _ ? center([ -_[1], _[0] ]) : (_ = center(), [ -_[1], _[0] ]); + }; + projection.rotate = function(_) { + return _ ? rotate([ _[0], _[1], _.length > 2 ? _[2] + 90 : 90 ]) : (_ = rotate(), + [ _[0], _[1], _[2] - 90 ]); + }; + return projection.rotate([ 0, 0 ]); + }).raw = d3_geo_transverseMercator; + d3.geom = {}; + function d3_geom_pointX(d) { + return d[0]; + } + function d3_geom_pointY(d) { + return d[1]; + } + d3.geom.hull = function(vertices) { + var x = d3_geom_pointX, y = d3_geom_pointY; + if (arguments.length) return hull(vertices); + function hull(data) { + if (data.length < 3) return []; + var fx = d3_functor(x), fy = d3_functor(y), i, n = data.length, points = [], flippedPoints = []; + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + points.push([ +fx.call(this, data[i], i), +fy.call(this, data[i], i), i ]); + } + points.sort(d3_geom_hullOrder); + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) flippedPoints.push([ points[i][0], -points[i][1] ]); + var upper = d3_geom_hullUpper(points), lower = d3_geom_hullUpper(flippedPoints); + var skipLeft = lower[0] === upper[0], skipRight = lower[lower.length - 1] === upper[upper.length - 1], polygon = []; + for (i = upper.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) polygon.push(data[points[upper[i]][2]]); + for (i = +skipLeft; i < lower.length - skipRight; ++i) polygon.push(data[points[lower[i]][2]]); + return polygon; + } + hull.x = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? (x = _, hull) : x; + }; + hull.y = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? (y = _, hull) : y; + }; + return hull; + }; + function d3_geom_hullUpper(points) { + var n = points.length, hull = [ 0, 1 ], hs = 2; + for (var i = 2; i < n; i++) { + while (hs > 1 && d3_cross2d(points[hull[hs - 2]], points[hull[hs - 1]], points[i]) <= 0) --hs; + hull[hs++] = i; + } + return hull.slice(0, hs); + } + function d3_geom_hullOrder(a, b) { + return a[0] - b[0] || a[1] - b[1]; + } + d3.geom.polygon = function(coordinates) { + d3_subclass(coordinates, d3_geom_polygonPrototype); + return coordinates; + }; + var d3_geom_polygonPrototype = d3.geom.polygon.prototype = []; + d3_geom_polygonPrototype.area = function() { + var i = -1, n = this.length, a, b = this[n - 1], area = 0; + while (++i < n) { + a = b; + b = this[i]; + area += a[1] * b[0] - a[0] * b[1]; + } + return area * .5; + }; + d3_geom_polygonPrototype.centroid = function(k) { + var i = -1, n = this.length, x = 0, y = 0, a, b = this[n - 1], c; + if (!arguments.length) k = -1 / (6 * this.area()); + while (++i < n) { + a = b; + b = this[i]; + c = a[0] * b[1] - b[0] * a[1]; + x += (a[0] + b[0]) * c; + y += (a[1] + b[1]) * c; + } + return [ x * k, y * k ]; + }; + d3_geom_polygonPrototype.clip = function(subject) { + var input, closed = d3_geom_polygonClosed(subject), i = -1, n = this.length - d3_geom_polygonClosed(this), j, m, a = this[n - 1], b, c, d; + while (++i < n) { + input = subject.slice(); + subject.length = 0; + b = this[i]; + c = input[(m = input.length - closed) - 1]; + j = -1; + while (++j < m) { + d = input[j]; + if (d3_geom_polygonInside(d, a, b)) { + if (!d3_geom_polygonInside(c, a, b)) { + subject.push(d3_geom_polygonIntersect(c, d, a, b)); + } + subject.push(d); + } else if (d3_geom_polygonInside(c, a, b)) { + subject.push(d3_geom_polygonIntersect(c, d, a, b)); + } + c = d; + } + if (closed) subject.push(subject[0]); + a = b; + } + return subject; + }; + function d3_geom_polygonInside(p, a, b) { + return (b[0] - a[0]) * (p[1] - a[1]) < (b[1] - a[1]) * (p[0] - a[0]); + } + function d3_geom_polygonIntersect(c, d, a, b) { + var x1 = c[0], x3 = a[0], x21 = d[0] - x1, x43 = b[0] - x3, y1 = c[1], y3 = a[1], y21 = d[1] - y1, y43 = b[1] - y3, ua = (x43 * (y1 - y3) - y43 * (x1 - x3)) / (y43 * x21 - x43 * y21); + return [ x1 + ua * x21, y1 + ua * y21 ]; + } + function d3_geom_polygonClosed(coordinates) { + var a = coordinates[0], b = coordinates[coordinates.length - 1]; + return !(a[0] - b[0] || a[1] - b[1]); + } + var d3_geom_voronoiEdges, d3_geom_voronoiCells, d3_geom_voronoiBeaches, d3_geom_voronoiBeachPool = [], d3_geom_voronoiFirstCircle, d3_geom_voronoiCircles, d3_geom_voronoiCirclePool = []; + function d3_geom_voronoiBeach() { + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackNode(this); + this.edge = this.site = this.circle = null; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiCreateBeach(site) { + var beach = d3_geom_voronoiBeachPool.pop() || new d3_geom_voronoiBeach(); + beach.site = site; + return beach; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiDetachBeach(beach) { + d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(beach); + d3_geom_voronoiBeaches.remove(beach); + d3_geom_voronoiBeachPool.push(beach); + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackNode(beach); + } + function d3_geom_voronoiRemoveBeach(beach) { + var circle = beach.circle, x = circle.x, y = circle.cy, vertex = { + x: x, + y: y + }, previous = beach.P, next = beach.N, disappearing = [ beach ]; + d3_geom_voronoiDetachBeach(beach); + var lArc = previous; + while (lArc.circle && abs(x - lArc.circle.x) < ε && abs(y - lArc.circle.cy) < ε) { + previous = lArc.P; + disappearing.unshift(lArc); + d3_geom_voronoiDetachBeach(lArc); + lArc = previous; + } + disappearing.unshift(lArc); + d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(lArc); + var rArc = next; + while (rArc.circle && abs(x - rArc.circle.x) < ε && abs(y - rArc.circle.cy) < ε) { + next = rArc.N; + disappearing.push(rArc); + d3_geom_voronoiDetachBeach(rArc); + rArc = next; + } + disappearing.push(rArc); + d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(rArc); + var nArcs = disappearing.length, iArc; + for (iArc = 1; iArc < nArcs; ++iArc) { + rArc = disappearing[iArc]; + lArc = disappearing[iArc - 1]; + d3_geom_voronoiSetEdgeEnd(rArc.edge, lArc.site, rArc.site, vertex); + } + lArc = disappearing[0]; + rArc = disappearing[nArcs - 1]; + rArc.edge = d3_geom_voronoiCreateEdge(lArc.site, rArc.site, null, vertex); + d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(lArc); + d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(rArc); + } + function d3_geom_voronoiAddBeach(site) { + var x = site.x, directrix = site.y, lArc, rArc, dxl, dxr, node = d3_geom_voronoiBeaches._; + while (node) { + dxl = d3_geom_voronoiLeftBreakPoint(node, directrix) - x; + if (dxl > ε) node = node.L; else { + dxr = x - d3_geom_voronoiRightBreakPoint(node, directrix); + if (dxr > ε) { + if (!node.R) { + lArc = node; + break; + } + node = node.R; + } else { + if (dxl > -ε) { + lArc = node.P; + rArc = node; + } else if (dxr > -ε) { + lArc = node; + rArc = node.N; + } else { + lArc = rArc = node; + } + break; + } + } + } + var newArc = d3_geom_voronoiCreateBeach(site); + d3_geom_voronoiBeaches.insert(lArc, newArc); + if (!lArc && !rArc) return; + if (lArc === rArc) { + d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(lArc); + rArc = d3_geom_voronoiCreateBeach(lArc.site); + d3_geom_voronoiBeaches.insert(newArc, rArc); + newArc.edge = rArc.edge = d3_geom_voronoiCreateEdge(lArc.site, newArc.site); + d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(lArc); + d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(rArc); + return; + } + if (!rArc) { + newArc.edge = d3_geom_voronoiCreateEdge(lArc.site, newArc.site); + return; + } + d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(lArc); + d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(rArc); + var lSite = lArc.site, ax = lSite.x, ay = lSite.y, bx = site.x - ax, by = site.y - ay, rSite = rArc.site, cx = rSite.x - ax, cy = rSite.y - ay, d = 2 * (bx * cy - by * cx), hb = bx * bx + by * by, hc = cx * cx + cy * cy, vertex = { + x: (cy * hb - by * hc) / d + ax, + y: (bx * hc - cx * hb) / d + ay + }; + d3_geom_voronoiSetEdgeEnd(rArc.edge, lSite, rSite, vertex); + newArc.edge = d3_geom_voronoiCreateEdge(lSite, site, null, vertex); + rArc.edge = d3_geom_voronoiCreateEdge(site, rSite, null, vertex); + d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(lArc); + d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(rArc); + } + function d3_geom_voronoiLeftBreakPoint(arc, directrix) { + var site = arc.site, rfocx = site.x, rfocy = site.y, pby2 = rfocy - directrix; + if (!pby2) return rfocx; + var lArc = arc.P; + if (!lArc) return -Infinity; + site = lArc.site; + var lfocx = site.x, lfocy = site.y, plby2 = lfocy - directrix; + if (!plby2) return lfocx; + var hl = lfocx - rfocx, aby2 = 1 / pby2 - 1 / plby2, b = hl / plby2; + if (aby2) return (-b + Math.sqrt(b * b - 2 * aby2 * (hl * hl / (-2 * plby2) - lfocy + plby2 / 2 + rfocy - pby2 / 2))) / aby2 + rfocx; + return (rfocx + lfocx) / 2; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiRightBreakPoint(arc, directrix) { + var rArc = arc.N; + if (rArc) return d3_geom_voronoiLeftBreakPoint(rArc, directrix); + var site = arc.site; + return site.y === directrix ? site.x : Infinity; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiCell(site) { + this.site = site; + this.edges = []; + } + d3_geom_voronoiCell.prototype.prepare = function() { + var halfEdges = this.edges, iHalfEdge = halfEdges.length, edge; + while (iHalfEdge--) { + edge = halfEdges[iHalfEdge].edge; + if (!edge.b || !edge.a) halfEdges.splice(iHalfEdge, 1); + } + halfEdges.sort(d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdgeOrder); + return halfEdges.length; + }; + function d3_geom_voronoiCloseCells(extent) { + var x0 = extent[0][0], x1 = extent[1][0], y0 = extent[0][1], y1 = extent[1][1], x2, y2, x3, y3, cells = d3_geom_voronoiCells, iCell = cells.length, cell, iHalfEdge, halfEdges, nHalfEdges, start, end; + while (iCell--) { + cell = cells[iCell]; + if (!cell || !cell.prepare()) continue; + halfEdges = cell.edges; + nHalfEdges = halfEdges.length; + iHalfEdge = 0; + while (iHalfEdge < nHalfEdges) { + end = halfEdges[iHalfEdge].end(), x3 = end.x, y3 = end.y; + start = halfEdges[++iHalfEdge % nHalfEdges].start(), x2 = start.x, y2 = start.y; + if (abs(x3 - x2) > ε || abs(y3 - y2) > ε) { + halfEdges.splice(iHalfEdge, 0, new d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdge(d3_geom_voronoiCreateBorderEdge(cell.site, end, abs(x3 - x0) < ε && y1 - y3 > ε ? { + x: x0, + y: abs(x2 - x0) < ε ? y2 : y1 + } : abs(y3 - y1) < ε && x1 - x3 > ε ? { + x: abs(y2 - y1) < ε ? x2 : x1, + y: y1 + } : abs(x3 - x1) < ε && y3 - y0 > ε ? { + x: x1, + y: abs(x2 - x1) < ε ? y2 : y0 + } : abs(y3 - y0) < ε && x3 - x0 > ε ? { + x: abs(y2 - y0) < ε ? x2 : x0, + y: y0 + } : null), cell.site, null)); + ++nHalfEdges; + } + } + } + } + function d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdgeOrder(a, b) { + return b.angle - a.angle; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiCircle() { + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackNode(this); + this.x = this.y = this.arc = this.site = this.cy = null; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiAttachCircle(arc) { + var lArc = arc.P, rArc = arc.N; + if (!lArc || !rArc) return; + var lSite = lArc.site, cSite = arc.site, rSite = rArc.site; + if (lSite === rSite) return; + var bx = cSite.x, by = cSite.y, ax = lSite.x - bx, ay = lSite.y - by, cx = rSite.x - bx, cy = rSite.y - by; + var d = 2 * (ax * cy - ay * cx); + if (d >= -ε2) return; + var ha = ax * ax + ay * ay, hc = cx * cx + cy * cy, x = (cy * ha - ay * hc) / d, y = (ax * hc - cx * ha) / d, cy = y + by; + var circle = d3_geom_voronoiCirclePool.pop() || new d3_geom_voronoiCircle(); + circle.arc = arc; + circle.site = cSite; + circle.x = x + bx; + circle.y = cy + Math.sqrt(x * x + y * y); + circle.cy = cy; + arc.circle = circle; + var before = null, node = d3_geom_voronoiCircles._; + while (node) { + if (circle.y < node.y || circle.y === node.y && circle.x <= node.x) { + if (node.L) node = node.L; else { + before = node.P; + break; + } + } else { + if (node.R) node = node.R; else { + before = node; + break; + } + } + } + d3_geom_voronoiCircles.insert(before, circle); + if (!before) d3_geom_voronoiFirstCircle = circle; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiDetachCircle(arc) { + var circle = arc.circle; + if (circle) { + if (!circle.P) d3_geom_voronoiFirstCircle = circle.N; + d3_geom_voronoiCircles.remove(circle); + d3_geom_voronoiCirclePool.push(circle); + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackNode(circle); + arc.circle = null; + } + } + function d3_geom_voronoiClipEdges(extent) { + var edges = d3_geom_voronoiEdges, clip = d3_geom_clipLine(extent[0][0], extent[0][1], extent[1][0], extent[1][1]), i = edges.length, e; + while (i--) { + e = edges[i]; + if (!d3_geom_voronoiConnectEdge(e, extent) || !clip(e) || abs(e.a.x - e.b.x) < ε && abs(e.a.y - e.b.y) < ε) { + e.a = e.b = null; + edges.splice(i, 1); + } + } + } + function d3_geom_voronoiConnectEdge(edge, extent) { + var vb = edge.b; + if (vb) return true; + var va = edge.a, x0 = extent[0][0], x1 = extent[1][0], y0 = extent[0][1], y1 = extent[1][1], lSite = edge.l, rSite = edge.r, lx = lSite.x, ly = lSite.y, rx = rSite.x, ry = rSite.y, fx = (lx + rx) / 2, fy = (ly + ry) / 2, fm, fb; + if (ry === ly) { + if (fx < x0 || fx >= x1) return; + if (lx > rx) { + if (!va) va = { + x: fx, + y: y0 + }; else if (va.y >= y1) return; + vb = { + x: fx, + y: y1 + }; + } else { + if (!va) va = { + x: fx, + y: y1 + }; else if (va.y < y0) return; + vb = { + x: fx, + y: y0 + }; + } + } else { + fm = (lx - rx) / (ry - ly); + fb = fy - fm * fx; + if (fm < -1 || fm > 1) { + if (lx > rx) { + if (!va) va = { + x: (y0 - fb) / fm, + y: y0 + }; else if (va.y >= y1) return; + vb = { + x: (y1 - fb) / fm, + y: y1 + }; + } else { + if (!va) va = { + x: (y1 - fb) / fm, + y: y1 + }; else if (va.y < y0) return; + vb = { + x: (y0 - fb) / fm, + y: y0 + }; + } + } else { + if (ly < ry) { + if (!va) va = { + x: x0, + y: fm * x0 + fb + }; else if (va.x >= x1) return; + vb = { + x: x1, + y: fm * x1 + fb + }; + } else { + if (!va) va = { + x: x1, + y: fm * x1 + fb + }; else if (va.x < x0) return; + vb = { + x: x0, + y: fm * x0 + fb + }; + } + } + } + edge.a = va; + edge.b = vb; + return true; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiEdge(lSite, rSite) { + this.l = lSite; + this.r = rSite; + this.a = this.b = null; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiCreateEdge(lSite, rSite, va, vb) { + var edge = new d3_geom_voronoiEdge(lSite, rSite); + d3_geom_voronoiEdges.push(edge); + if (va) d3_geom_voronoiSetEdgeEnd(edge, lSite, rSite, va); + if (vb) d3_geom_voronoiSetEdgeEnd(edge, rSite, lSite, vb); + d3_geom_voronoiCells[lSite.i].edges.push(new d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdge(edge, lSite, rSite)); + d3_geom_voronoiCells[rSite.i].edges.push(new d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdge(edge, rSite, lSite)); + return edge; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiCreateBorderEdge(lSite, va, vb) { + var edge = new d3_geom_voronoiEdge(lSite, null); + edge.a = va; + edge.b = vb; + d3_geom_voronoiEdges.push(edge); + return edge; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiSetEdgeEnd(edge, lSite, rSite, vertex) { + if (!edge.a && !edge.b) { + edge.a = vertex; + edge.l = lSite; + edge.r = rSite; + } else if (edge.l === rSite) { + edge.b = vertex; + } else { + edge.a = vertex; + } + } + function d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdge(edge, lSite, rSite) { + var va = edge.a, vb = edge.b; + this.edge = edge; + this.site = lSite; + this.angle = rSite ? Math.atan2(rSite.y - lSite.y, rSite.x - lSite.x) : edge.l === lSite ? Math.atan2(vb.x - va.x, va.y - vb.y) : Math.atan2(va.x - vb.x, vb.y - va.y); + } + d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdge.prototype = { + start: function() { + return this.edge.l === this.site ? this.edge.a : this.edge.b; + }, + end: function() { + return this.edge.l === this.site ? this.edge.b : this.edge.a; + } + }; + function d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackTree() { + this._ = null; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackNode(node) { + node.U = node.C = node.L = node.R = node.P = node.N = null; + } + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackTree.prototype = { + insert: function(after, node) { + var parent, grandpa, uncle; + if (after) { + node.P = after; + node.N = after.N; + if (after.N) after.N.P = node; + after.N = node; + if (after.R) { + after = after.R; + while (after.L) after = after.L; + after.L = node; + } else { + after.R = node; + } + parent = after; + } else if (this._) { + after = d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackFirst(this._); + node.P = null; + node.N = after; + after.P = after.L = node; + parent = after; + } else { + node.P = node.N = null; + this._ = node; + parent = null; + } + node.L = node.R = null; + node.U = parent; + node.C = true; + after = node; + while (parent && parent.C) { + grandpa = parent.U; + if (parent === grandpa.L) { + uncle = grandpa.R; + if (uncle && uncle.C) { + parent.C = uncle.C = false; + grandpa.C = true; + after = grandpa; + } else { + if (after === parent.R) { + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateLeft(this, parent); + after = parent; + parent = after.U; + } + parent.C = false; + grandpa.C = true; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateRight(this, grandpa); + } + } else { + uncle = grandpa.L; + if (uncle && uncle.C) { + parent.C = uncle.C = false; + grandpa.C = true; + after = grandpa; + } else { + if (after === parent.L) { + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateRight(this, parent); + after = parent; + parent = after.U; + } + parent.C = false; + grandpa.C = true; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateLeft(this, grandpa); + } + } + parent = after.U; + } + this._.C = false; + }, + remove: function(node) { + if (node.N) node.N.P = node.P; + if (node.P) node.P.N = node.N; + node.N = node.P = null; + var parent = node.U, sibling, left = node.L, right = node.R, next, red; + if (!left) next = right; else if (!right) next = left; else next = d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackFirst(right); + if (parent) { + if (parent.L === node) parent.L = next; else parent.R = next; + } else { + this._ = next; + } + if (left && right) { + red = next.C; + next.C = node.C; + next.L = left; + left.U = next; + if (next !== right) { + parent = next.U; + next.U = node.U; + node = next.R; + parent.L = node; + next.R = right; + right.U = next; + } else { + next.U = parent; + parent = next; + node = next.R; + } + } else { + red = node.C; + node = next; + } + if (node) node.U = parent; + if (red) return; + if (node && node.C) { + node.C = false; + return; + } + do { + if (node === this._) break; + if (node === parent.L) { + sibling = parent.R; + if (sibling.C) { + sibling.C = false; + parent.C = true; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateLeft(this, parent); + sibling = parent.R; + } + if (sibling.L && sibling.L.C || sibling.R && sibling.R.C) { + if (!sibling.R || !sibling.R.C) { + sibling.L.C = false; + sibling.C = true; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateRight(this, sibling); + sibling = parent.R; + } + sibling.C = parent.C; + parent.C = sibling.R.C = false; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateLeft(this, parent); + node = this._; + break; + } + } else { + sibling = parent.L; + if (sibling.C) { + sibling.C = false; + parent.C = true; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateRight(this, parent); + sibling = parent.L; + } + if (sibling.L && sibling.L.C || sibling.R && sibling.R.C) { + if (!sibling.L || !sibling.L.C) { + sibling.R.C = false; + sibling.C = true; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateLeft(this, sibling); + sibling = parent.L; + } + sibling.C = parent.C; + parent.C = sibling.L.C = false; + d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateRight(this, parent); + node = this._; + break; + } + } + sibling.C = true; + node = parent; + parent = parent.U; + } while (!node.C); + if (node) node.C = false; + } + }; + function d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateLeft(tree, node) { + var p = node, q = node.R, parent = p.U; + if (parent) { + if (parent.L === p) parent.L = q; else parent.R = q; + } else { + tree._ = q; + } + q.U = parent; + p.U = q; + p.R = q.L; + if (p.R) p.R.U = p; + q.L = p; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackRotateRight(tree, node) { + var p = node, q = node.L, parent = p.U; + if (parent) { + if (parent.L === p) parent.L = q; else parent.R = q; + } else { + tree._ = q; + } + q.U = parent; + p.U = q; + p.L = q.R; + if (p.L) p.L.U = p; + q.R = p; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackFirst(node) { + while (node.L) node = node.L; + return node; + } + function d3_geom_voronoi(sites, bbox) { + var site = sites.sort(d3_geom_voronoiVertexOrder).pop(), x0, y0, circle; + d3_geom_voronoiEdges = []; + d3_geom_voronoiCells = new Array(sites.length); + d3_geom_voronoiBeaches = new d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackTree(); + d3_geom_voronoiCircles = new d3_geom_voronoiRedBlackTree(); + while (true) { + circle = d3_geom_voronoiFirstCircle; + if (site && (!circle || site.y < circle.y || site.y === circle.y && site.x < circle.x)) { + if (site.x !== x0 || site.y !== y0) { + d3_geom_voronoiCells[site.i] = new d3_geom_voronoiCell(site); + d3_geom_voronoiAddBeach(site); + x0 = site.x, y0 = site.y; + } + site = sites.pop(); + } else if (circle) { + d3_geom_voronoiRemoveBeach(circle.arc); + } else { + break; + } + } + if (bbox) d3_geom_voronoiClipEdges(bbox), d3_geom_voronoiCloseCells(bbox); + var diagram = { + cells: d3_geom_voronoiCells, + edges: d3_geom_voronoiEdges + }; + d3_geom_voronoiBeaches = d3_geom_voronoiCircles = d3_geom_voronoiEdges = d3_geom_voronoiCells = null; + return diagram; + } + function d3_geom_voronoiVertexOrder(a, b) { + return b.y - a.y || b.x - a.x; + } + d3.geom.voronoi = function(points) { + var x = d3_geom_pointX, y = d3_geom_pointY, fx = x, fy = y, clipExtent = d3_geom_voronoiClipExtent; + if (points) return voronoi(points); + function voronoi(data) { + var polygons = new Array(data.length), x0 = clipExtent[0][0], y0 = clipExtent[0][1], x1 = clipExtent[1][0], y1 = clipExtent[1][1]; + d3_geom_voronoi(sites(data), clipExtent).cells.forEach(function(cell, i) { + var edges = cell.edges, site = cell.site, polygon = polygons[i] = edges.length ? edges.map(function(e) { + var s = e.start(); + return [ s.x, s.y ]; + }) : site.x >= x0 && site.x <= x1 && site.y >= y0 && site.y <= y1 ? [ [ x0, y1 ], [ x1, y1 ], [ x1, y0 ], [ x0, y0 ] ] : []; + polygon.point = data[i]; + }); + return polygons; + } + function sites(data) { + return data.map(function(d, i) { + return { + x: Math.round(fx(d, i) / ε) * ε, + y: Math.round(fy(d, i) / ε) * ε, + i: i + }; + }); + } + voronoi.links = function(data) { + return d3_geom_voronoi(sites(data)).edges.filter(function(edge) { + return edge.l && edge.r; + }).map(function(edge) { + return { + source: data[edge.l.i], + target: data[edge.r.i] + }; + }); + }; + voronoi.triangles = function(data) { + var triangles = []; + d3_geom_voronoi(sites(data)).cells.forEach(function(cell, i) { + var site = cell.site, edges = cell.edges.sort(d3_geom_voronoiHalfEdgeOrder), j = -1, m = edges.length, e0, s0, e1 = edges[m - 1].edge, s1 = e1.l === site ? e1.r : e1.l; + while (++j < m) { + e0 = e1; + s0 = s1; + e1 = edges[j].edge; + s1 = e1.l === site ? e1.r : e1.l; + if (i < s0.i && i < s1.i && d3_geom_voronoiTriangleArea(site, s0, s1) < 0) { + triangles.push([ data[i], data[s0.i], data[s1.i] ]); + } + } + }); + return triangles; + }; + voronoi.x = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? (fx = d3_functor(x = _), voronoi) : x; + }; + voronoi.y = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? (fy = d3_functor(y = _), voronoi) : y; + }; + voronoi.clipExtent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return clipExtent === d3_geom_voronoiClipExtent ? null : clipExtent; + clipExtent = _ == null ? d3_geom_voronoiClipExtent : _; + return voronoi; + }; + voronoi.size = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return clipExtent === d3_geom_voronoiClipExtent ? null : clipExtent && clipExtent[1]; + return voronoi.clipExtent(_ && [ [ 0, 0 ], _ ]); + }; + return voronoi; + }; + var d3_geom_voronoiClipExtent = [ [ -1e6, -1e6 ], [ 1e6, 1e6 ] ]; + function d3_geom_voronoiTriangleArea(a, b, c) { + return (a.x - c.x) * (b.y - a.y) - (a.x - b.x) * (c.y - a.y); + } + d3.geom.delaunay = function(vertices) { + return d3.geom.voronoi().triangles(vertices); + }; + d3.geom.quadtree = function(points, x1, y1, x2, y2) { + var x = d3_geom_pointX, y = d3_geom_pointY, compat; + if (compat = arguments.length) { + x = d3_geom_quadtreeCompatX; + y = d3_geom_quadtreeCompatY; + if (compat === 3) { + y2 = y1; + x2 = x1; + y1 = x1 = 0; + } + return quadtree(points); + } + function quadtree(data) { + var d, fx = d3_functor(x), fy = d3_functor(y), xs, ys, i, n, x1_, y1_, x2_, y2_; + if (x1 != null) { + x1_ = x1, y1_ = y1, x2_ = x2, y2_ = y2; + } else { + x2_ = y2_ = -(x1_ = y1_ = Infinity); + xs = [], ys = []; + n = data.length; + if (compat) for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) { + d = data[i]; + if (d.x < x1_) x1_ = d.x; + if (d.y < y1_) y1_ = d.y; + if (d.x > x2_) x2_ = d.x; + if (d.y > y2_) y2_ = d.y; + xs.push(d.x); + ys.push(d.y); + } else for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) { + var x_ = +fx(d = data[i], i), y_ = +fy(d, i); + if (x_ < x1_) x1_ = x_; + if (y_ < y1_) y1_ = y_; + if (x_ > x2_) x2_ = x_; + if (y_ > y2_) y2_ = y_; + xs.push(x_); + ys.push(y_); + } + } + var dx = x2_ - x1_, dy = y2_ - y1_; + if (dx > dy) y2_ = y1_ + dx; else x2_ = x1_ + dy; + function insert(n, d, x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2) { + if (isNaN(x) || isNaN(y)) return; + if (n.leaf) { + var nx = n.x, ny = n.y; + if (nx != null) { + if (abs(nx - x) + abs(ny - y) < .01) { + insertChild(n, d, x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2); + } else { + var nPoint = n.point; + n.x = n.y = n.point = null; + insertChild(n, nPoint, nx, ny, x1, y1, x2, y2); + insertChild(n, d, x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2); + } + } else { + n.x = x, n.y = y, n.point = d; + } + } else { + insertChild(n, d, x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2); + } + } + function insertChild(n, d, x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2) { + var sx = (x1 + x2) * .5, sy = (y1 + y2) * .5, right = x >= sx, bottom = y >= sy, i = (bottom << 1) + right; + n.leaf = false; + n = n.nodes[i] || (n.nodes[i] = d3_geom_quadtreeNode()); + if (right) x1 = sx; else x2 = sx; + if (bottom) y1 = sy; else y2 = sy; + insert(n, d, x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2); + } + var root = d3_geom_quadtreeNode(); + root.add = function(d) { + insert(root, d, +fx(d, ++i), +fy(d, i), x1_, y1_, x2_, y2_); + }; + root.visit = function(f) { + d3_geom_quadtreeVisit(f, root, x1_, y1_, x2_, y2_); + }; + i = -1; + if (x1 == null) { + while (++i < n) { + insert(root, data[i], xs[i], ys[i], x1_, y1_, x2_, y2_); + } + --i; + } else data.forEach(root.add); + xs = ys = data = d = null; + return root; + } + quadtree.x = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? (x = _, quadtree) : x; + }; + quadtree.y = function(_) { + return arguments.length ? (y = _, quadtree) : y; + }; + quadtree.extent = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return x1 == null ? null : [ [ x1, y1 ], [ x2, y2 ] ]; + if (_ == null) x1 = y1 = x2 = y2 = null; else x1 = +_[0][0], y1 = +_[0][1], x2 = +_[1][0], + y2 = +_[1][1]; + return quadtree; + }; + quadtree.size = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return x1 == null ? null : [ x2 - x1, y2 - y1 ]; + if (_ == null) x1 = y1 = x2 = y2 = null; else x1 = y1 = 0, x2 = +_[0], y2 = +_[1]; + return quadtree; + }; + return quadtree; + }; + function d3_geom_quadtreeCompatX(d) { + return d.x; + } + function d3_geom_quadtreeCompatY(d) { + return d.y; + } + function d3_geom_quadtreeNode() { + return { + leaf: true, + nodes: [], + point: null, + x: null, + y: null + }; + } + function d3_geom_quadtreeVisit(f, node, x1, y1, x2, y2) { + if (!f(node, x1, y1, x2, y2)) { + var sx = (x1 + x2) * .5, sy = (y1 + y2) * .5, children = node.nodes; + if (children[0]) d3_geom_quadtreeVisit(f, children[0], x1, y1, sx, sy); + if (children[1]) d3_geom_quadtreeVisit(f, children[1], sx, y1, x2, sy); + if (children[2]) d3_geom_quadtreeVisit(f, children[2], x1, sy, sx, y2); + if (children[3]) d3_geom_quadtreeVisit(f, children[3], sx, sy, x2, y2); + } + } + d3.interpolateRgb = d3_interpolateRgb; + function d3_interpolateRgb(a, b) { + a = d3.rgb(a); + b = d3.rgb(b); + var ar = a.r, ag = a.g, ab = a.b, br = b.r - ar, bg = b.g - ag, bb = b.b - ab; + return function(t) { + return "#" + d3_rgb_hex(Math.round(ar + br * t)) + d3_rgb_hex(Math.round(ag + bg * t)) + d3_rgb_hex(Math.round(ab + bb * t)); + }; + } + d3.interpolateObject = d3_interpolateObject; + function d3_interpolateObject(a, b) { + var i = {}, c = {}, k; + for (k in a) { + if (k in b) { + i[k] = d3_interpolate(a[k], b[k]); + } else { + c[k] = a[k]; + } + } + for (k in b) { + if (!(k in a)) { + c[k] = b[k]; + } + } + return function(t) { + for (k in i) c[k] = i[k](t); + return c; + }; + } + d3.interpolateNumber = d3_interpolateNumber; + function d3_interpolateNumber(a, b) { + b -= a = +a; + return function(t) { + return a + b * t; + }; + } + d3.interpolateString = d3_interpolateString; + function d3_interpolateString(a, b) { + var bi = d3_interpolate_numberA.lastIndex = d3_interpolate_numberB.lastIndex = 0, am, bm, bs, i = -1, s = [], q = []; + a = a + "", b = b + ""; + while ((am = d3_interpolate_numberA.exec(a)) && (bm = d3_interpolate_numberB.exec(b))) { + if ((bs = bm.index) > bi) { + bs = b.substring(bi, bs); + if (s[i]) s[i] += bs; else s[++i] = bs; + } + if ((am = am[0]) === (bm = bm[0])) { + if (s[i]) s[i] += bm; else s[++i] = bm; + } else { + s[++i] = null; + q.push({ + i: i, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(am, bm) + }); + } + bi = d3_interpolate_numberB.lastIndex; + } + if (bi < b.length) { + bs = b.substring(bi); + if (s[i]) s[i] += bs; else s[++i] = bs; + } + return s.length < 2 ? q[0] ? (b = q[0].x, function(t) { + return b(t) + ""; + }) : function() { + return b; + } : (b = q.length, function(t) { + for (var i = 0, o; i < b; ++i) s[(o = q[i]).i] = o.x(t); + return s.join(""); + }); + } + var d3_interpolate_numberA = /[-+]?(?:\d+\.?\d*|\.?\d+)(?:[eE][-+]?\d+)?/g, d3_interpolate_numberB = new RegExp(d3_interpolate_numberA.source, "g"); + d3.interpolate = d3_interpolate; + function d3_interpolate(a, b) { + var i = d3.interpolators.length, f; + while (--i >= 0 && !(f = d3.interpolators[i](a, b))) ; + return f; + } + d3.interpolators = [ function(a, b) { + var t = typeof b; + return (t === "string" ? d3_rgb_names.has(b) || /^(#|rgb\(|hsl\()/.test(b) ? d3_interpolateRgb : d3_interpolateString : b instanceof d3_Color ? d3_interpolateRgb : Array.isArray(b) ? d3_interpolateArray : t === "object" && isNaN(b) ? d3_interpolateObject : d3_interpolateNumber)(a, b); + } ]; + d3.interpolateArray = d3_interpolateArray; + function d3_interpolateArray(a, b) { + var x = [], c = [], na = a.length, nb = b.length, n0 = Math.min(a.length, b.length), i; + for (i = 0; i < n0; ++i) x.push(d3_interpolate(a[i], b[i])); + for (;i < na; ++i) c[i] = a[i]; + for (;i < nb; ++i) c[i] = b[i]; + return function(t) { + for (i = 0; i < n0; ++i) c[i] = x[i](t); + return c; + }; + } + var d3_ease_default = function() { + return d3_identity; + }; + var d3_ease = d3.map({ + linear: d3_ease_default, + poly: d3_ease_poly, + quad: function() { + return d3_ease_quad; + }, + cubic: function() { + return d3_ease_cubic; + }, + sin: function() { + return d3_ease_sin; + }, + exp: function() { + return d3_ease_exp; + }, + circle: function() { + return d3_ease_circle; + }, + elastic: d3_ease_elastic, + back: d3_ease_back, + bounce: function() { + return d3_ease_bounce; + } + }); + var d3_ease_mode = d3.map({ + "in": d3_identity, + out: d3_ease_reverse, + "in-out": d3_ease_reflect, + "out-in": function(f) { + return d3_ease_reflect(d3_ease_reverse(f)); + } + }); + d3.ease = function(name) { + var i = name.indexOf("-"), t = i >= 0 ? name.substring(0, i) : name, m = i >= 0 ? name.substring(i + 1) : "in"; + t = d3_ease.get(t) || d3_ease_default; + m = d3_ease_mode.get(m) || d3_identity; + return d3_ease_clamp(m(t.apply(null, d3_arraySlice.call(arguments, 1)))); + }; + function d3_ease_clamp(f) { + return function(t) { + return t <= 0 ? 0 : t >= 1 ? 1 : f(t); + }; + } + function d3_ease_reverse(f) { + return function(t) { + return 1 - f(1 - t); + }; + } + function d3_ease_reflect(f) { + return function(t) { + return .5 * (t < .5 ? f(2 * t) : 2 - f(2 - 2 * t)); + }; + } + function d3_ease_quad(t) { + return t * t; + } + function d3_ease_cubic(t) { + return t * t * t; + } + function d3_ease_cubicInOut(t) { + if (t <= 0) return 0; + if (t >= 1) return 1; + var t2 = t * t, t3 = t2 * t; + return 4 * (t < .5 ? t3 : 3 * (t - t2) + t3 - .75); + } + function d3_ease_poly(e) { + return function(t) { + return Math.pow(t, e); + }; + } + function d3_ease_sin(t) { + return 1 - Math.cos(t * halfπ); + } + function d3_ease_exp(t) { + return Math.pow(2, 10 * (t - 1)); + } + function d3_ease_circle(t) { + return 1 - Math.sqrt(1 - t * t); + } + function d3_ease_elastic(a, p) { + var s; + if (arguments.length < 2) p = .45; + if (arguments.length) s = p / τ * Math.asin(1 / a); else a = 1, s = p / 4; + return function(t) { + return 1 + a * Math.pow(2, -10 * t) * Math.sin((t - s) * τ / p); + }; + } + function d3_ease_back(s) { + if (!s) s = 1.70158; + return function(t) { + return t * t * ((s + 1) * t - s); + }; + } + function d3_ease_bounce(t) { + return t < 1 / 2.75 ? 7.5625 * t * t : t < 2 / 2.75 ? 7.5625 * (t -= 1.5 / 2.75) * t + .75 : t < 2.5 / 2.75 ? 7.5625 * (t -= 2.25 / 2.75) * t + .9375 : 7.5625 * (t -= 2.625 / 2.75) * t + .984375; + } + d3.interpolateHcl = d3_interpolateHcl; + function d3_interpolateHcl(a, b) { + a = d3.hcl(a); + b = d3.hcl(b); + var ah = a.h, ac = a.c, al = a.l, bh = b.h - ah, bc = b.c - ac, bl = b.l - al; + if (isNaN(bc)) bc = 0, ac = isNaN(ac) ? b.c : ac; + if (isNaN(bh)) bh = 0, ah = isNaN(ah) ? b.h : ah; else if (bh > 180) bh -= 360; else if (bh < -180) bh += 360; + return function(t) { + return d3_hcl_lab(ah + bh * t, ac + bc * t, al + bl * t) + ""; + }; + } + d3.interpolateHsl = d3_interpolateHsl; + function d3_interpolateHsl(a, b) { + a = d3.hsl(a); + b = d3.hsl(b); + var ah = a.h, as = a.s, al = a.l, bh = b.h - ah, bs = b.s - as, bl = b.l - al; + if (isNaN(bs)) bs = 0, as = isNaN(as) ? b.s : as; + if (isNaN(bh)) bh = 0, ah = isNaN(ah) ? b.h : ah; else if (bh > 180) bh -= 360; else if (bh < -180) bh += 360; + return function(t) { + return d3_hsl_rgb(ah + bh * t, as + bs * t, al + bl * t) + ""; + }; + } + d3.interpolateLab = d3_interpolateLab; + function d3_interpolateLab(a, b) { + a = d3.lab(a); + b = d3.lab(b); + var al = a.l, aa = a.a, ab = a.b, bl = b.l - al, ba = b.a - aa, bb = b.b - ab; + return function(t) { + return d3_lab_rgb(al + bl * t, aa + ba * t, ab + bb * t) + ""; + }; + } + d3.interpolateRound = d3_interpolateRound; + function d3_interpolateRound(a, b) { + b -= a; + return function(t) { + return Math.round(a + b * t); + }; + } + d3.transform = function(string) { + var g = d3_document.createElementNS(d3.ns.prefix.svg, "g"); + return (d3.transform = function(string) { + if (string != null) { + g.setAttribute("transform", string); + var t = g.transform.baseVal.consolidate(); + } + return new d3_transform(t ? t.matrix : d3_transformIdentity); + })(string); + }; + function d3_transform(m) { + var r0 = [ m.a, m.b ], r1 = [ m.c, m.d ], kx = d3_transformNormalize(r0), kz = d3_transformDot(r0, r1), ky = d3_transformNormalize(d3_transformCombine(r1, r0, -kz)) || 0; + if (r0[0] * r1[1] < r1[0] * r0[1]) { + r0[0] *= -1; + r0[1] *= -1; + kx *= -1; + kz *= -1; + } + this.rotate = (kx ? Math.atan2(r0[1], r0[0]) : Math.atan2(-r1[0], r1[1])) * d3_degrees; + this.translate = [ m.e, m.f ]; + this.scale = [ kx, ky ]; + this.skew = ky ? Math.atan2(kz, ky) * d3_degrees : 0; + } + d3_transform.prototype.toString = function() { + return "translate(" + this.translate + ")rotate(" + this.rotate + ")skewX(" + this.skew + ")scale(" + this.scale + ")"; + }; + function d3_transformDot(a, b) { + return a[0] * b[0] + a[1] * b[1]; + } + function d3_transformNormalize(a) { + var k = Math.sqrt(d3_transformDot(a, a)); + if (k) { + a[0] /= k; + a[1] /= k; + } + return k; + } + function d3_transformCombine(a, b, k) { + a[0] += k * b[0]; + a[1] += k * b[1]; + return a; + } + var d3_transformIdentity = { + a: 1, + b: 0, + c: 0, + d: 1, + e: 0, + f: 0 + }; + d3.interpolateTransform = d3_interpolateTransform; + function d3_interpolateTransform(a, b) { + var s = [], q = [], n, A = d3.transform(a), B = d3.transform(b), ta = A.translate, tb = B.translate, ra = A.rotate, rb = B.rotate, wa = A.skew, wb = B.skew, ka = A.scale, kb = B.scale; + if (ta[0] != tb[0] || ta[1] != tb[1]) { + s.push("translate(", null, ",", null, ")"); + q.push({ + i: 1, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(ta[0], tb[0]) + }, { + i: 3, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(ta[1], tb[1]) + }); + } else if (tb[0] || tb[1]) { + s.push("translate(" + tb + ")"); + } else { + s.push(""); + } + if (ra != rb) { + if (ra - rb > 180) rb += 360; else if (rb - ra > 180) ra += 360; + q.push({ + i: s.push(s.pop() + "rotate(", null, ")") - 2, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(ra, rb) + }); + } else if (rb) { + s.push(s.pop() + "rotate(" + rb + ")"); + } + if (wa != wb) { + q.push({ + i: s.push(s.pop() + "skewX(", null, ")") - 2, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(wa, wb) + }); + } else if (wb) { + s.push(s.pop() + "skewX(" + wb + ")"); + } + if (ka[0] != kb[0] || ka[1] != kb[1]) { + n = s.push(s.pop() + "scale(", null, ",", null, ")"); + q.push({ + i: n - 4, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(ka[0], kb[0]) + }, { + i: n - 2, + x: d3_interpolateNumber(ka[1], kb[1]) + }); + } else if (kb[0] != 1 || kb[1] != 1) { + s.push(s.pop() + "scale(" + kb + ")"); + } + n = q.length; + return function(t) { + var i = -1, o; + while (++i < n) s[(o = q[i]).i] = o.x(t); + return s.join(""); + }; + } + function d3_uninterpolateNumber(a, b) { + b = b - (a = +a) ? 1 / (b - a) : 0; + return function(x) { + return (x - a) * b; + }; + } + function d3_uninterpolateClamp(a, b) { + b = b - (a = +a) ? 1 / (b - a) : 0; + return function(x) { + return Math.max(0, Math.min(1, (x - a) * b)); + }; + } + d3.layout = {}; + d3.layout.bundle = function() { + return function(links) { + var paths = [], i = -1, n = links.length; + while (++i < n) paths.push(d3_layout_bundlePath(links[i])); + return paths; + }; + }; + function d3_layout_bundlePath(link) { + var start = link.source, end = link.target, lca = d3_layout_bundleLeastCommonAncestor(start, end), points = [ start ]; + while (start !== lca) { + start = start.parent; + points.push(start); + } + var k = points.length; + while (end !== lca) { + points.splice(k, 0, end); + end = end.parent; + } + return points; + } + function d3_layout_bundleAncestors(node) { + var ancestors = [], parent = node.parent; + while (parent != null) { + ancestors.push(node); + node = parent; + parent = parent.parent; + } + ancestors.push(node); + return ancestors; + } + function d3_layout_bundleLeastCommonAncestor(a, b) { + if (a === b) return a; + var aNodes = d3_layout_bundleAncestors(a), bNodes = d3_layout_bundleAncestors(b), aNode = aNodes.pop(), bNode = bNodes.pop(), sharedNode = null; + while (aNode === bNode) { + sharedNode = aNode; + aNode = aNodes.pop(); + bNode = bNodes.pop(); + } + return sharedNode; + } + d3.layout.chord = function() { + var chord = {}, chords, groups, matrix, n, padding = 0, sortGroups, sortSubgroups, sortChords; + function relayout() { + var subgroups = {}, groupSums = [], groupIndex = d3.range(n), subgroupIndex = [], k, x, x0, i, j; + chords = []; + groups = []; + k = 0, i = -1; + while (++i < n) { + x = 0, j = -1; + while (++j < n) { + x += matrix[i][j]; + } + groupSums.push(x); + subgroupIndex.push(d3.range(n)); + k += x; + } + if (sortGroups) { + groupIndex.sort(function(a, b) { + return sortGroups(groupSums[a], groupSums[b]); + }); + } + if (sortSubgroups) { + subgroupIndex.forEach(function(d, i) { + d.sort(function(a, b) { + return sortSubgroups(matrix[i][a], matrix[i][b]); + }); + }); + } + k = (τ - padding * n) / k; + x = 0, i = -1; + while (++i < n) { + x0 = x, j = -1; + while (++j < n) { + var di = groupIndex[i], dj = subgroupIndex[di][j], v = matrix[di][dj], a0 = x, a1 = x += v * k; + subgroups[di + "-" + dj] = { + index: di, + subindex: dj, + startAngle: a0, + endAngle: a1, + value: v + }; + } + groups[di] = { + index: di, + startAngle: x0, + endAngle: x, + value: (x - x0) / k + }; + x += padding; + } + i = -1; + while (++i < n) { + j = i - 1; + while (++j < n) { + var source = subgroups[i + "-" + j], target = subgroups[j + "-" + i]; + if (source.value || target.value) { + chords.push(source.value < target.value ? { + source: target, + target: source + } : { + source: source, + target: target + }); + } + } + } + if (sortChords) resort(); + } + function resort() { + chords.sort(function(a, b) { + return sortChords((a.source.value + a.target.value) / 2, (b.source.value + b.target.value) / 2); + }); + } + chord.matrix = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return matrix; + n = (matrix = x) && matrix.length; + chords = groups = null; + return chord; + }; + chord.padding = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return padding; + padding = x; + chords = groups = null; + return chord; + }; + chord.sortGroups = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return sortGroups; + sortGroups = x; + chords = groups = null; + return chord; + }; + chord.sortSubgroups = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return sortSubgroups; + sortSubgroups = x; + chords = null; + return chord; + }; + chord.sortChords = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return sortChords; + sortChords = x; + if (chords) resort(); + return chord; + }; + chord.chords = function() { + if (!chords) relayout(); + return chords; + }; + chord.groups = function() { + if (!groups) relayout(); + return groups; + }; + return chord; + }; + d3.layout.force = function() { + var force = {}, event = d3.dispatch("start", "tick", "end"), size = [ 1, 1 ], drag, alpha, friction = .9, linkDistance = d3_layout_forceLinkDistance, linkStrength = d3_layout_forceLinkStrength, charge = -30, chargeDistance2 = d3_layout_forceChargeDistance2, gravity = .1, theta2 = .64, nodes = [], links = [], distances, strengths, charges; + function repulse(node) { + return function(quad, x1, _, x2) { + if (quad.point !== node) { + var dx = quad.cx - node.x, dy = quad.cy - node.y, dw = x2 - x1, dn = dx * dx + dy * dy; + if (dw * dw / theta2 < dn) { + if (dn < chargeDistance2) { + var k = quad.charge / dn; + node.px -= dx * k; + node.py -= dy * k; + } + return true; + } + if (quad.point && dn && dn < chargeDistance2) { + var k = quad.pointCharge / dn; + node.px -= dx * k; + node.py -= dy * k; + } + } + return !quad.charge; + }; + } + force.tick = function() { + if ((alpha *= .99) < .005) { + event.end({ + type: "end", + alpha: alpha = 0 + }); + return true; + } + var n = nodes.length, m = links.length, q, i, o, s, t, l, k, x, y; + for (i = 0; i < m; ++i) { + o = links[i]; + s = o.source; + t = o.target; + x = t.x - s.x; + y = t.y - s.y; + if (l = x * x + y * y) { + l = alpha * strengths[i] * ((l = Math.sqrt(l)) - distances[i]) / l; + x *= l; + y *= l; + t.x -= x * (k = s.weight / (t.weight + s.weight)); + t.y -= y * k; + s.x += x * (k = 1 - k); + s.y += y * k; + } + } + if (k = alpha * gravity) { + x = size[0] / 2; + y = size[1] / 2; + i = -1; + if (k) while (++i < n) { + o = nodes[i]; + o.x += (x - o.x) * k; + o.y += (y - o.y) * k; + } + } + if (charge) { + d3_layout_forceAccumulate(q = d3.geom.quadtree(nodes), alpha, charges); + i = -1; + while (++i < n) { + if (!(o = nodes[i]).fixed) { + q.visit(repulse(o)); + } + } + } + i = -1; + while (++i < n) { + o = nodes[i]; + if (o.fixed) { + o.x = o.px; + o.y = o.py; + } else { + o.x -= (o.px - (o.px = o.x)) * friction; + o.y -= (o.py - (o.py = o.y)) * friction; + } + } + event.tick({ + type: "tick", + alpha: alpha + }); + }; + force.nodes = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return nodes; + nodes = x; + return force; + }; + force.links = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return links; + links = x; + return force; + }; + force.size = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return size; + size = x; + return force; + }; + force.linkDistance = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return linkDistance; + linkDistance = typeof x === "function" ? x : +x; + return force; + }; + force.distance = force.linkDistance; + force.linkStrength = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return linkStrength; + linkStrength = typeof x === "function" ? x : +x; + return force; + }; + force.friction = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return friction; + friction = +x; + return force; + }; + force.charge = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return charge; + charge = typeof x === "function" ? x : +x; + return force; + }; + force.chargeDistance = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return Math.sqrt(chargeDistance2); + chargeDistance2 = x * x; + return force; + }; + force.gravity = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return gravity; + gravity = +x; + return force; + }; + force.theta = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return Math.sqrt(theta2); + theta2 = x * x; + return force; + }; + force.alpha = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return alpha; + x = +x; + if (alpha) { + if (x > 0) alpha = x; else alpha = 0; + } else if (x > 0) { + event.start({ + type: "start", + alpha: alpha = x + }); + d3.timer(force.tick); + } + return force; + }; + force.start = function() { + var i, n = nodes.length, m = links.length, w = size[0], h = size[1], neighbors, o; + for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) { + (o = nodes[i]).index = i; + o.weight = 0; + } + for (i = 0; i < m; ++i) { + o = links[i]; + if (typeof o.source == "number") o.source = nodes[o.source]; + if (typeof o.target == "number") o.target = nodes[o.target]; + ++o.source.weight; + ++o.target.weight; + } + for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) { + o = nodes[i]; + if (isNaN(o.x)) o.x = position("x", w); + if (isNaN(o.y)) o.y = position("y", h); + if (isNaN(o.px)) o.px = o.x; + if (isNaN(o.py)) o.py = o.y; + } + distances = []; + if (typeof linkDistance === "function") for (i = 0; i < m; ++i) distances[i] = +linkDistance.call(this, links[i], i); else for (i = 0; i < m; ++i) distances[i] = linkDistance; + strengths = []; + if (typeof linkStrength === "function") for (i = 0; i < m; ++i) strengths[i] = +linkStrength.call(this, links[i], i); else for (i = 0; i < m; ++i) strengths[i] = linkStrength; + charges = []; + if (typeof charge === "function") for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) charges[i] = +charge.call(this, nodes[i], i); else for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) charges[i] = charge; + function position(dimension, size) { + if (!neighbors) { + neighbors = new Array(n); + for (j = 0; j < n; ++j) { + neighbors[j] = []; + } + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) { + var o = links[j]; + neighbors[o.source.index].push(o.target); + neighbors[o.target.index].push(o.source); + } + } + var candidates = neighbors[i], j = -1, m = candidates.length, x; + while (++j < m) if (!isNaN(x = candidates[j][dimension])) return x; + return Math.random() * size; + } + return force.resume(); + }; + force.resume = function() { + return force.alpha(.1); + }; + force.stop = function() { + return force.alpha(0); + }; + force.drag = function() { + if (!drag) drag = d3.behavior.drag().origin(d3_identity).on("dragstart.force", d3_layout_forceDragstart).on("drag.force", dragmove).on("dragend.force", d3_layout_forceDragend); + if (!arguments.length) return drag; + this.on("mouseover.force", d3_layout_forceMouseover).on("mouseout.force", d3_layout_forceMouseout).call(drag); + }; + function dragmove(d) { + d.px = d3.event.x, d.py = d3.event.y; + force.resume(); + } + return d3.rebind(force, event, "on"); + }; + function d3_layout_forceDragstart(d) { + d.fixed |= 2; + } + function d3_layout_forceDragend(d) { + d.fixed &= ~6; + } + function d3_layout_forceMouseover(d) { + d.fixed |= 4; + d.px = d.x, d.py = d.y; + } + function d3_layout_forceMouseout(d) { + d.fixed &= ~4; + } + function d3_layout_forceAccumulate(quad, alpha, charges) { + var cx = 0, cy = 0; + quad.charge = 0; + if (!quad.leaf) { + var nodes = quad.nodes, n = nodes.length, i = -1, c; + while (++i < n) { + c = nodes[i]; + if (c == null) continue; + d3_layout_forceAccumulate(c, alpha, charges); + quad.charge += c.charge; + cx += c.charge * c.cx; + cy += c.charge * c.cy; + } + } + if (quad.point) { + if (!quad.leaf) { + quad.point.x += Math.random() - .5; + quad.point.y += Math.random() - .5; + } + var k = alpha * charges[quad.point.index]; + quad.charge += quad.pointCharge = k; + cx += k * quad.point.x; + cy += k * quad.point.y; + } + quad.cx = cx / quad.charge; + quad.cy = cy / quad.charge; + } + var d3_layout_forceLinkDistance = 20, d3_layout_forceLinkStrength = 1, d3_layout_forceChargeDistance2 = Infinity; + d3.layout.hierarchy = function() { + var sort = d3_layout_hierarchySort, children = d3_layout_hierarchyChildren, value = d3_layout_hierarchyValue; + function hierarchy(root) { + var stack = [ root ], nodes = [], node; + root.depth = 0; + while ((node = stack.pop()) != null) { + nodes.push(node); + if ((childs = children.call(hierarchy, node, node.depth)) && (n = childs.length)) { + var n, childs, child; + while (--n >= 0) { + stack.push(child = childs[n]); + child.parent = node; + child.depth = node.depth + 1; + } + if (value) node.value = 0; + node.children = childs; + } else { + if (value) node.value = +value.call(hierarchy, node, node.depth) || 0; + delete node.children; + } + } + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, function(node) { + var childs, parent; + if (sort && (childs = node.children)) childs.sort(sort); + if (value && (parent = node.parent)) parent.value += node.value; + }); + return nodes; + } + hierarchy.sort = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return sort; + sort = x; + return hierarchy; + }; + hierarchy.children = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return children; + children = x; + return hierarchy; + }; + hierarchy.value = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return value; + value = x; + return hierarchy; + }; + hierarchy.revalue = function(root) { + if (value) { + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitBefore(root, function(node) { + if (node.children) node.value = 0; + }); + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, function(node) { + var parent; + if (!node.children) node.value = +value.call(hierarchy, node, node.depth) || 0; + if (parent = node.parent) parent.value += node.value; + }); + } + return root; + }; + return hierarchy; + }; + function d3_layout_hierarchyRebind(object, hierarchy) { + d3.rebind(object, hierarchy, "sort", "children", "value"); + object.nodes = object; + object.links = d3_layout_hierarchyLinks; + return object; + } + function d3_layout_hierarchyVisitBefore(node, callback) { + var nodes = [ node ]; + while ((node = nodes.pop()) != null) { + callback(node); + if ((children = node.children) && (n = children.length)) { + var n, children; + while (--n >= 0) nodes.push(children[n]); + } + } + } + function d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(node, callback) { + var nodes = [ node ], nodes2 = []; + while ((node = nodes.pop()) != null) { + nodes2.push(node); + if ((children = node.children) && (n = children.length)) { + var i = -1, n, children; + while (++i < n) nodes.push(children[i]); + } + } + while ((node = nodes2.pop()) != null) { + callback(node); + } + } + function d3_layout_hierarchyChildren(d) { + return d.children; + } + function d3_layout_hierarchyValue(d) { + return d.value; + } + function d3_layout_hierarchySort(a, b) { + return b.value - a.value; + } + function d3_layout_hierarchyLinks(nodes) { + return d3.merge(nodes.map(function(parent) { + return (parent.children || []).map(function(child) { + return { + source: parent, + target: child + }; + }); + })); + } + d3.layout.partition = function() { + var hierarchy = d3.layout.hierarchy(), size = [ 1, 1 ]; + function position(node, x, dx, dy) { + var children = node.children; + node.x = x; + node.y = node.depth * dy; + node.dx = dx; + node.dy = dy; + if (children && (n = children.length)) { + var i = -1, n, c, d; + dx = node.value ? dx / node.value : 0; + while (++i < n) { + position(c = children[i], x, d = c.value * dx, dy); + x += d; + } + } + } + function depth(node) { + var children = node.children, d = 0; + if (children && (n = children.length)) { + var i = -1, n; + while (++i < n) d = Math.max(d, depth(children[i])); + } + return 1 + d; + } + function partition(d, i) { + var nodes = hierarchy.call(this, d, i); + position(nodes[0], 0, size[0], size[1] / depth(nodes[0])); + return nodes; + } + partition.size = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return size; + size = x; + return partition; + }; + return d3_layout_hierarchyRebind(partition, hierarchy); + }; + d3.layout.pie = function() { + var value = Number, sort = d3_layout_pieSortByValue, startAngle = 0, endAngle = τ; + function pie(data) { + var values = data.map(function(d, i) { + return +value.call(pie, d, i); + }); + var a = +(typeof startAngle === "function" ? startAngle.apply(this, arguments) : startAngle); + var k = ((typeof endAngle === "function" ? endAngle.apply(this, arguments) : endAngle) - a) / d3.sum(values); + var index = d3.range(data.length); + if (sort != null) index.sort(sort === d3_layout_pieSortByValue ? function(i, j) { + return values[j] - values[i]; + } : function(i, j) { + return sort(data[i], data[j]); + }); + var arcs = []; + index.forEach(function(i) { + var d; + arcs[i] = { + data: data[i], + value: d = values[i], + startAngle: a, + endAngle: a += d * k + }; + }); + return arcs; + } + pie.value = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return value; + value = x; + return pie; + }; + pie.sort = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return sort; + sort = x; + return pie; + }; + pie.startAngle = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return startAngle; + startAngle = x; + return pie; + }; + pie.endAngle = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return endAngle; + endAngle = x; + return pie; + }; + return pie; + }; + var d3_layout_pieSortByValue = {}; + d3.layout.stack = function() { + var values = d3_identity, order = d3_layout_stackOrderDefault, offset = d3_layout_stackOffsetZero, out = d3_layout_stackOut, x = d3_layout_stackX, y = d3_layout_stackY; + function stack(data, index) { + var series = data.map(function(d, i) { + return values.call(stack, d, i); + }); + var points = series.map(function(d) { + return d.map(function(v, i) { + return [ x.call(stack, v, i), y.call(stack, v, i) ]; + }); + }); + var orders = order.call(stack, points, index); + series = d3.permute(series, orders); + points = d3.permute(points, orders); + var offsets = offset.call(stack, points, index); + var n = series.length, m = series[0].length, i, j, o; + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) { + out.call(stack, series[0][j], o = offsets[j], points[0][j][1]); + for (i = 1; i < n; ++i) { + out.call(stack, series[i][j], o += points[i - 1][j][1], points[i][j][1]); + } + } + return data; + } + stack.values = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return values; + values = x; + return stack; + }; + stack.order = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return order; + order = typeof x === "function" ? x : d3_layout_stackOrders.get(x) || d3_layout_stackOrderDefault; + return stack; + }; + stack.offset = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return offset; + offset = typeof x === "function" ? x : d3_layout_stackOffsets.get(x) || d3_layout_stackOffsetZero; + return stack; + }; + stack.x = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return x; + x = z; + return stack; + }; + stack.y = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return y; + y = z; + return stack; + }; + stack.out = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return out; + out = z; + return stack; + }; + return stack; + }; + function d3_layout_stackX(d) { + return d.x; + } + function d3_layout_stackY(d) { + return d.y; + } + function d3_layout_stackOut(d, y0, y) { + d.y0 = y0; + d.y = y; + } + var d3_layout_stackOrders = d3.map({ + "inside-out": function(data) { + var n = data.length, i, j, max = data.map(d3_layout_stackMaxIndex), sums = data.map(d3_layout_stackReduceSum), index = d3.range(n).sort(function(a, b) { + return max[a] - max[b]; + }), top = 0, bottom = 0, tops = [], bottoms = []; + for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) { + j = index[i]; + if (top < bottom) { + top += sums[j]; + tops.push(j); + } else { + bottom += sums[j]; + bottoms.push(j); + } + } + return bottoms.reverse().concat(tops); + }, + reverse: function(data) { + return d3.range(data.length).reverse(); + }, + "default": d3_layout_stackOrderDefault + }); + var d3_layout_stackOffsets = d3.map({ + silhouette: function(data) { + var n = data.length, m = data[0].length, sums = [], max = 0, i, j, o, y0 = []; + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) { + for (i = 0, o = 0; i < n; i++) o += data[i][j][1]; + if (o > max) max = o; + sums.push(o); + } + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) { + y0[j] = (max - sums[j]) / 2; + } + return y0; + }, + wiggle: function(data) { + var n = data.length, x = data[0], m = x.length, i, j, k, s1, s2, s3, dx, o, o0, y0 = []; + y0[0] = o = o0 = 0; + for (j = 1; j < m; ++j) { + for (i = 0, s1 = 0; i < n; ++i) s1 += data[i][j][1]; + for (i = 0, s2 = 0, dx = x[j][0] - x[j - 1][0]; i < n; ++i) { + for (k = 0, s3 = (data[i][j][1] - data[i][j - 1][1]) / (2 * dx); k < i; ++k) { + s3 += (data[k][j][1] - data[k][j - 1][1]) / dx; + } + s2 += s3 * data[i][j][1]; + } + y0[j] = o -= s1 ? s2 / s1 * dx : 0; + if (o < o0) o0 = o; + } + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) y0[j] -= o0; + return y0; + }, + expand: function(data) { + var n = data.length, m = data[0].length, k = 1 / n, i, j, o, y0 = []; + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) { + for (i = 0, o = 0; i < n; i++) o += data[i][j][1]; + if (o) for (i = 0; i < n; i++) data[i][j][1] /= o; else for (i = 0; i < n; i++) data[i][j][1] = k; + } + for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) y0[j] = 0; + return y0; + }, + zero: d3_layout_stackOffsetZero + }); + function d3_layout_stackOrderDefault(data) { + return d3.range(data.length); + } + function d3_layout_stackOffsetZero(data) { + var j = -1, m = data[0].length, y0 = []; + while (++j < m) y0[j] = 0; + return y0; + } + function d3_layout_stackMaxIndex(array) { + var i = 1, j = 0, v = array[0][1], k, n = array.length; + for (;i < n; ++i) { + if ((k = array[i][1]) > v) { + j = i; + v = k; + } + } + return j; + } + function d3_layout_stackReduceSum(d) { + return d.reduce(d3_layout_stackSum, 0); + } + function d3_layout_stackSum(p, d) { + return p + d[1]; + } + d3.layout.histogram = function() { + var frequency = true, valuer = Number, ranger = d3_layout_histogramRange, binner = d3_layout_histogramBinSturges; + function histogram(data, i) { + var bins = [], values = data.map(valuer, this), range = ranger.call(this, values, i), thresholds = binner.call(this, range, values, i), bin, i = -1, n = values.length, m = thresholds.length - 1, k = frequency ? 1 : 1 / n, x; + while (++i < m) { + bin = bins[i] = []; + bin.dx = thresholds[i + 1] - (bin.x = thresholds[i]); + bin.y = 0; + } + if (m > 0) { + i = -1; + while (++i < n) { + x = values[i]; + if (x >= range[0] && x <= range[1]) { + bin = bins[d3.bisect(thresholds, x, 1, m) - 1]; + bin.y += k; + bin.push(data[i]); + } + } + } + return bins; + } + histogram.value = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return valuer; + valuer = x; + return histogram; + }; + histogram.range = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return ranger; + ranger = d3_functor(x); + return histogram; + }; + histogram.bins = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return binner; + binner = typeof x === "number" ? function(range) { + return d3_layout_histogramBinFixed(range, x); + } : d3_functor(x); + return histogram; + }; + histogram.frequency = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return frequency; + frequency = !!x; + return histogram; + }; + return histogram; + }; + function d3_layout_histogramBinSturges(range, values) { + return d3_layout_histogramBinFixed(range, Math.ceil(Math.log(values.length) / Math.LN2 + 1)); + } + function d3_layout_histogramBinFixed(range, n) { + var x = -1, b = +range[0], m = (range[1] - b) / n, f = []; + while (++x <= n) f[x] = m * x + b; + return f; + } + function d3_layout_histogramRange(values) { + return [ d3.min(values), d3.max(values) ]; + } + d3.layout.pack = function() { + var hierarchy = d3.layout.hierarchy().sort(d3_layout_packSort), padding = 0, size = [ 1, 1 ], radius; + function pack(d, i) { + var nodes = hierarchy.call(this, d, i), root = nodes[0], w = size[0], h = size[1], r = radius == null ? Math.sqrt : typeof radius === "function" ? radius : function() { + return radius; + }; + root.x = root.y = 0; + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, function(d) { + d.r = +r(d.value); + }); + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, d3_layout_packSiblings); + if (padding) { + var dr = padding * (radius ? 1 : Math.max(2 * root.r / w, 2 * root.r / h)) / 2; + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, function(d) { + d.r += dr; + }); + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, d3_layout_packSiblings); + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, function(d) { + d.r -= dr; + }); + } + d3_layout_packTransform(root, w / 2, h / 2, radius ? 1 : 1 / Math.max(2 * root.r / w, 2 * root.r / h)); + return nodes; + } + pack.size = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return size; + size = _; + return pack; + }; + pack.radius = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return radius; + radius = _ == null || typeof _ === "function" ? _ : +_; + return pack; + }; + pack.padding = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return padding; + padding = +_; + return pack; + }; + return d3_layout_hierarchyRebind(pack, hierarchy); + }; + function d3_layout_packSort(a, b) { + return a.value - b.value; + } + function d3_layout_packInsert(a, b) { + var c = a._pack_next; + a._pack_next = b; + b._pack_prev = a; + b._pack_next = c; + c._pack_prev = b; + } + function d3_layout_packSplice(a, b) { + a._pack_next = b; + b._pack_prev = a; + } + function d3_layout_packIntersects(a, b) { + var dx = b.x - a.x, dy = b.y - a.y, dr = a.r + b.r; + return .999 * dr * dr > dx * dx + dy * dy; + } + function d3_layout_packSiblings(node) { + if (!(nodes = node.children) || !(n = nodes.length)) return; + var nodes, xMin = Infinity, xMax = -Infinity, yMin = Infinity, yMax = -Infinity, a, b, c, i, j, k, n; + function bound(node) { + xMin = Math.min(node.x - node.r, xMin); + xMax = Math.max(node.x + node.r, xMax); + yMin = Math.min(node.y - node.r, yMin); + yMax = Math.max(node.y + node.r, yMax); + } + nodes.forEach(d3_layout_packLink); + a = nodes[0]; + a.x = -a.r; + a.y = 0; + bound(a); + if (n > 1) { + b = nodes[1]; + b.x = b.r; + b.y = 0; + bound(b); + if (n > 2) { + c = nodes[2]; + d3_layout_packPlace(a, b, c); + bound(c); + d3_layout_packInsert(a, c); + a._pack_prev = c; + d3_layout_packInsert(c, b); + b = a._pack_next; + for (i = 3; i < n; i++) { + d3_layout_packPlace(a, b, c = nodes[i]); + var isect = 0, s1 = 1, s2 = 1; + for (j = b._pack_next; j !== b; j = j._pack_next, s1++) { + if (d3_layout_packIntersects(j, c)) { + isect = 1; + break; + } + } + if (isect == 1) { + for (k = a._pack_prev; k !== j._pack_prev; k = k._pack_prev, s2++) { + if (d3_layout_packIntersects(k, c)) { + break; + } + } + } + if (isect) { + if (s1 < s2 || s1 == s2 && b.r < a.r) d3_layout_packSplice(a, b = j); else d3_layout_packSplice(a = k, b); + i--; + } else { + d3_layout_packInsert(a, c); + b = c; + bound(c); + } + } + } + } + var cx = (xMin + xMax) / 2, cy = (yMin + yMax) / 2, cr = 0; + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + c = nodes[i]; + c.x -= cx; + c.y -= cy; + cr = Math.max(cr, c.r + Math.sqrt(c.x * c.x + c.y * c.y)); + } + node.r = cr; + nodes.forEach(d3_layout_packUnlink); + } + function d3_layout_packLink(node) { + node._pack_next = node._pack_prev = node; + } + function d3_layout_packUnlink(node) { + delete node._pack_next; + delete node._pack_prev; + } + function d3_layout_packTransform(node, x, y, k) { + var children = node.children; + node.x = x += k * node.x; + node.y = y += k * node.y; + node.r *= k; + if (children) { + var i = -1, n = children.length; + while (++i < n) d3_layout_packTransform(children[i], x, y, k); + } + } + function d3_layout_packPlace(a, b, c) { + var db = a.r + c.r, dx = b.x - a.x, dy = b.y - a.y; + if (db && (dx || dy)) { + var da = b.r + c.r, dc = dx * dx + dy * dy; + da *= da; + db *= db; + var x = .5 + (db - da) / (2 * dc), y = Math.sqrt(Math.max(0, 2 * da * (db + dc) - (db -= dc) * db - da * da)) / (2 * dc); + c.x = a.x + x * dx + y * dy; + c.y = a.y + x * dy - y * dx; + } else { + c.x = a.x + db; + c.y = a.y; + } + } + d3.layout.tree = function() { + var hierarchy = d3.layout.hierarchy().sort(null).value(null), separation = d3_layout_treeSeparation, size = [ 1, 1 ], nodeSize = null; + function tree(d, i) { + var nodes = hierarchy.call(this, d, i), root0 = nodes[0], root1 = wrapTree(root0); + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root1, firstWalk), root1.parent.m = -root1.z; + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitBefore(root1, secondWalk); + if (nodeSize) d3_layout_hierarchyVisitBefore(root0, sizeNode); else { + var left = root0, right = root0, bottom = root0; + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitBefore(root0, function(node) { + if (node.x < left.x) left = node; + if (node.x > right.x) right = node; + if (node.depth > bottom.depth) bottom = node; + }); + var tx = separation(left, right) / 2 - left.x, kx = size[0] / (right.x + separation(right, left) / 2 + tx), ky = size[1] / (bottom.depth || 1); + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitBefore(root0, function(node) { + node.x = (node.x + tx) * kx; + node.y = node.depth * ky; + }); + } + return nodes; + } + function wrapTree(root0) { + var root1 = { + A: null, + children: [ root0 ] + }, queue = [ root1 ], node1; + while ((node1 = queue.pop()) != null) { + for (var children = node1.children, child, i = 0, n = children.length; i < n; ++i) { + queue.push((children[i] = child = { + _: children[i], + parent: node1, + children: (child = children[i].children) && child.slice() || [], + A: null, + a: null, + z: 0, + m: 0, + c: 0, + s: 0, + t: null, + i: i + }).a = child); + } + } + return root1.children[0]; + } + function firstWalk(v) { + var children = v.children, siblings = v.parent.children, w = v.i ? siblings[v.i - 1] : null; + if (children.length) { + d3_layout_treeShift(v); + var midpoint = (children[0].z + children[children.length - 1].z) / 2; + if (w) { + v.z = w.z + separation(v._, w._); + v.m = v.z - midpoint; + } else { + v.z = midpoint; + } + } else if (w) { + v.z = w.z + separation(v._, w._); + } + v.parent.A = apportion(v, w, v.parent.A || siblings[0]); + } + function secondWalk(v) { + v._.x = v.z + v.parent.m; + v.m += v.parent.m; + } + function apportion(v, w, ancestor) { + if (w) { + var vip = v, vop = v, vim = w, vom = vip.parent.children[0], sip = vip.m, sop = vop.m, sim = vim.m, som = vom.m, shift; + while (vim = d3_layout_treeRight(vim), vip = d3_layout_treeLeft(vip), vim && vip) { + vom = d3_layout_treeLeft(vom); + vop = d3_layout_treeRight(vop); + vop.a = v; + shift = vim.z + sim - vip.z - sip + separation(vim._, vip._); + if (shift > 0) { + d3_layout_treeMove(d3_layout_treeAncestor(vim, v, ancestor), v, shift); + sip += shift; + sop += shift; + } + sim += vim.m; + sip += vip.m; + som += vom.m; + sop += vop.m; + } + if (vim && !d3_layout_treeRight(vop)) { + vop.t = vim; + vop.m += sim - sop; + } + if (vip && !d3_layout_treeLeft(vom)) { + vom.t = vip; + vom.m += sip - som; + ancestor = v; + } + } + return ancestor; + } + function sizeNode(node) { + node.x *= size[0]; + node.y = node.depth * size[1]; + } + tree.separation = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return separation; + separation = x; + return tree; + }; + tree.size = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return nodeSize ? null : size; + nodeSize = (size = x) == null ? sizeNode : null; + return tree; + }; + tree.nodeSize = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return nodeSize ? size : null; + nodeSize = (size = x) == null ? null : sizeNode; + return tree; + }; + return d3_layout_hierarchyRebind(tree, hierarchy); + }; + function d3_layout_treeSeparation(a, b) { + return a.parent == b.parent ? 1 : 2; + } + function d3_layout_treeLeft(v) { + var children = v.children; + return children.length ? children[0] : v.t; + } + function d3_layout_treeRight(v) { + var children = v.children, n; + return (n = children.length) ? children[n - 1] : v.t; + } + function d3_layout_treeMove(wm, wp, shift) { + var change = shift / (wp.i - wm.i); + wp.c -= change; + wp.s += shift; + wm.c += change; + wp.z += shift; + wp.m += shift; + } + function d3_layout_treeShift(v) { + var shift = 0, change = 0, children = v.children, i = children.length, w; + while (--i >= 0) { + w = children[i]; + w.z += shift; + w.m += shift; + shift += w.s + (change += w.c); + } + } + function d3_layout_treeAncestor(vim, v, ancestor) { + return vim.a.parent === v.parent ? vim.a : ancestor; + } + d3.layout.cluster = function() { + var hierarchy = d3.layout.hierarchy().sort(null).value(null), separation = d3_layout_treeSeparation, size = [ 1, 1 ], nodeSize = false; + function cluster(d, i) { + var nodes = hierarchy.call(this, d, i), root = nodes[0], previousNode, x = 0; + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, function(node) { + var children = node.children; + if (children && children.length) { + node.x = d3_layout_clusterX(children); + node.y = d3_layout_clusterY(children); + } else { + node.x = previousNode ? x += separation(node, previousNode) : 0; + node.y = 0; + previousNode = node; + } + }); + var left = d3_layout_clusterLeft(root), right = d3_layout_clusterRight(root), x0 = left.x - separation(left, right) / 2, x1 = right.x + separation(right, left) / 2; + d3_layout_hierarchyVisitAfter(root, nodeSize ? function(node) { + node.x = (node.x - root.x) * size[0]; + node.y = (root.y - node.y) * size[1]; + } : function(node) { + node.x = (node.x - x0) / (x1 - x0) * size[0]; + node.y = (1 - (root.y ? node.y / root.y : 1)) * size[1]; + }); + return nodes; + } + cluster.separation = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return separation; + separation = x; + return cluster; + }; + cluster.size = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return nodeSize ? null : size; + nodeSize = (size = x) == null; + return cluster; + }; + cluster.nodeSize = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return nodeSize ? size : null; + nodeSize = (size = x) != null; + return cluster; + }; + return d3_layout_hierarchyRebind(cluster, hierarchy); + }; + function d3_layout_clusterY(children) { + return 1 + d3.max(children, function(child) { + return child.y; + }); + } + function d3_layout_clusterX(children) { + return children.reduce(function(x, child) { + return x + child.x; + }, 0) / children.length; + } + function d3_layout_clusterLeft(node) { + var children = node.children; + return children && children.length ? d3_layout_clusterLeft(children[0]) : node; + } + function d3_layout_clusterRight(node) { + var children = node.children, n; + return children && (n = children.length) ? d3_layout_clusterRight(children[n - 1]) : node; + } + d3.layout.treemap = function() { + var hierarchy = d3.layout.hierarchy(), round = Math.round, size = [ 1, 1 ], padding = null, pad = d3_layout_treemapPadNull, sticky = false, stickies, mode = "squarify", ratio = .5 * (1 + Math.sqrt(5)); + function scale(children, k) { + var i = -1, n = children.length, child, area; + while (++i < n) { + area = (child = children[i]).value * (k < 0 ? 0 : k); + child.area = isNaN(area) || area <= 0 ? 0 : area; + } + } + function squarify(node) { + var children = node.children; + if (children && children.length) { + var rect = pad(node), row = [], remaining = children.slice(), child, best = Infinity, score, u = mode === "slice" ? rect.dx : mode === "dice" ? rect.dy : mode === "slice-dice" ? node.depth & 1 ? rect.dy : rect.dx : Math.min(rect.dx, rect.dy), n; + scale(remaining, rect.dx * rect.dy / node.value); + row.area = 0; + while ((n = remaining.length) > 0) { + row.push(child = remaining[n - 1]); + row.area += child.area; + if (mode !== "squarify" || (score = worst(row, u)) <= best) { + remaining.pop(); + best = score; + } else { + row.area -= row.pop().area; + position(row, u, rect, false); + u = Math.min(rect.dx, rect.dy); + row.length = row.area = 0; + best = Infinity; + } + } + if (row.length) { + position(row, u, rect, true); + row.length = row.area = 0; + } + children.forEach(squarify); + } + } + function stickify(node) { + var children = node.children; + if (children && children.length) { + var rect = pad(node), remaining = children.slice(), child, row = []; + scale(remaining, rect.dx * rect.dy / node.value); + row.area = 0; + while (child = remaining.pop()) { + row.push(child); + row.area += child.area; + if (child.z != null) { + position(row, child.z ? rect.dx : rect.dy, rect, !remaining.length); + row.length = row.area = 0; + } + } + children.forEach(stickify); + } + } + function worst(row, u) { + var s = row.area, r, rmax = 0, rmin = Infinity, i = -1, n = row.length; + while (++i < n) { + if (!(r = row[i].area)) continue; + if (r < rmin) rmin = r; + if (r > rmax) rmax = r; + } + s *= s; + u *= u; + return s ? Math.max(u * rmax * ratio / s, s / (u * rmin * ratio)) : Infinity; + } + function position(row, u, rect, flush) { + var i = -1, n = row.length, x = rect.x, y = rect.y, v = u ? round(row.area / u) : 0, o; + if (u == rect.dx) { + if (flush || v > rect.dy) v = rect.dy; + while (++i < n) { + o = row[i]; + o.x = x; + o.y = y; + o.dy = v; + x += o.dx = Math.min(rect.x + rect.dx - x, v ? round(o.area / v) : 0); + } + o.z = true; + o.dx += rect.x + rect.dx - x; + rect.y += v; + rect.dy -= v; + } else { + if (flush || v > rect.dx) v = rect.dx; + while (++i < n) { + o = row[i]; + o.x = x; + o.y = y; + o.dx = v; + y += o.dy = Math.min(rect.y + rect.dy - y, v ? round(o.area / v) : 0); + } + o.z = false; + o.dy += rect.y + rect.dy - y; + rect.x += v; + rect.dx -= v; + } + } + function treemap(d) { + var nodes = stickies || hierarchy(d), root = nodes[0]; + root.x = 0; + root.y = 0; + root.dx = size[0]; + root.dy = size[1]; + if (stickies) hierarchy.revalue(root); + scale([ root ], root.dx * root.dy / root.value); + (stickies ? stickify : squarify)(root); + if (sticky) stickies = nodes; + return nodes; + } + treemap.size = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return size; + size = x; + return treemap; + }; + treemap.padding = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return padding; + function padFunction(node) { + var p = x.call(treemap, node, node.depth); + return p == null ? d3_layout_treemapPadNull(node) : d3_layout_treemapPad(node, typeof p === "number" ? [ p, p, p, p ] : p); + } + function padConstant(node) { + return d3_layout_treemapPad(node, x); + } + var type; + pad = (padding = x) == null ? d3_layout_treemapPadNull : (type = typeof x) === "function" ? padFunction : type === "number" ? (x = [ x, x, x, x ], + padConstant) : padConstant; + return treemap; + }; + treemap.round = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return round != Number; + round = x ? Math.round : Number; + return treemap; + }; + treemap.sticky = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return sticky; + sticky = x; + stickies = null; + return treemap; + }; + treemap.ratio = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return ratio; + ratio = x; + return treemap; + }; + treemap.mode = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return mode; + mode = x + ""; + return treemap; + }; + return d3_layout_hierarchyRebind(treemap, hierarchy); + }; + function d3_layout_treemapPadNull(node) { + return { + x: node.x, + y: node.y, + dx: node.dx, + dy: node.dy + }; + } + function d3_layout_treemapPad(node, padding) { + var x = node.x + padding[3], y = node.y + padding[0], dx = node.dx - padding[1] - padding[3], dy = node.dy - padding[0] - padding[2]; + if (dx < 0) { + x += dx / 2; + dx = 0; + } + if (dy < 0) { + y += dy / 2; + dy = 0; + } + return { + x: x, + y: y, + dx: dx, + dy: dy + }; + } + d3.random = { + normal: function(µ, σ) { + var n = arguments.length; + if (n < 2) σ = 1; + if (n < 1) µ = 0; + return function() { + var x, y, r; + do { + x = Math.random() * 2 - 1; + y = Math.random() * 2 - 1; + r = x * x + y * y; + } while (!r || r > 1); + return µ + σ * x * Math.sqrt(-2 * Math.log(r) / r); + }; + }, + logNormal: function() { + var random = d3.random.normal.apply(d3, arguments); + return function() { + return Math.exp(random()); + }; + }, + bates: function(m) { + var random = d3.random.irwinHall(m); + return function() { + return random() / m; + }; + }, + irwinHall: function(m) { + return function() { + for (var s = 0, j = 0; j < m; j++) s += Math.random(); + return s; + }; + } + }; + d3.scale = {}; + function d3_scaleExtent(domain) { + var start = domain[0], stop = domain[domain.length - 1]; + return start < stop ? [ start, stop ] : [ stop, start ]; + } + function d3_scaleRange(scale) { + return scale.rangeExtent ? scale.rangeExtent() : d3_scaleExtent(scale.range()); + } + function d3_scale_bilinear(domain, range, uninterpolate, interpolate) { + var u = uninterpolate(domain[0], domain[1]), i = interpolate(range[0], range[1]); + return function(x) { + return i(u(x)); + }; + } + function d3_scale_nice(domain, nice) { + var i0 = 0, i1 = domain.length - 1, x0 = domain[i0], x1 = domain[i1], dx; + if (x1 < x0) { + dx = i0, i0 = i1, i1 = dx; + dx = x0, x0 = x1, x1 = dx; + } + domain[i0] = nice.floor(x0); + domain[i1] = nice.ceil(x1); + return domain; + } + function d3_scale_niceStep(step) { + return step ? { + floor: function(x) { + return Math.floor(x / step) * step; + }, + ceil: function(x) { + return Math.ceil(x / step) * step; + } + } : d3_scale_niceIdentity; + } + var d3_scale_niceIdentity = { + floor: d3_identity, + ceil: d3_identity + }; + function d3_scale_polylinear(domain, range, uninterpolate, interpolate) { + var u = [], i = [], j = 0, k = Math.min(domain.length, range.length) - 1; + if (domain[k] < domain[0]) { + domain = domain.slice().reverse(); + range = range.slice().reverse(); + } + while (++j <= k) { + u.push(uninterpolate(domain[j - 1], domain[j])); + i.push(interpolate(range[j - 1], range[j])); + } + return function(x) { + var j = d3.bisect(domain, x, 1, k) - 1; + return i[j](u[j](x)); + }; + } + d3.scale.linear = function() { + return d3_scale_linear([ 0, 1 ], [ 0, 1 ], d3_interpolate, false); + }; + function d3_scale_linear(domain, range, interpolate, clamp) { + var output, input; + function rescale() { + var linear = Math.min(domain.length, range.length) > 2 ? d3_scale_polylinear : d3_scale_bilinear, uninterpolate = clamp ? d3_uninterpolateClamp : d3_uninterpolateNumber; + output = linear(domain, range, uninterpolate, interpolate); + input = linear(range, domain, uninterpolate, d3_interpolate); + return scale; + } + function scale(x) { + return output(x); + } + scale.invert = function(y) { + return input(y); + }; + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + domain = x.map(Number); + return rescale(); + }; + scale.range = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return range; + range = x; + return rescale(); + }; + scale.rangeRound = function(x) { + return scale.range(x).interpolate(d3_interpolateRound); + }; + scale.clamp = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return clamp; + clamp = x; + return rescale(); + }; + scale.interpolate = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return interpolate; + interpolate = x; + return rescale(); + }; + scale.ticks = function(m) { + return d3_scale_linearTicks(domain, m); + }; + scale.tickFormat = function(m, format) { + return d3_scale_linearTickFormat(domain, m, format); + }; + scale.nice = function(m) { + d3_scale_linearNice(domain, m); + return rescale(); + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_linear(domain, range, interpolate, clamp); + }; + return rescale(); + } + function d3_scale_linearRebind(scale, linear) { + return d3.rebind(scale, linear, "range", "rangeRound", "interpolate", "clamp"); + } + function d3_scale_linearNice(domain, m) { + return d3_scale_nice(domain, d3_scale_niceStep(d3_scale_linearTickRange(domain, m)[2])); + } + function d3_scale_linearTickRange(domain, m) { + if (m == null) m = 10; + var extent = d3_scaleExtent(domain), span = extent[1] - extent[0], step = Math.pow(10, Math.floor(Math.log(span / m) / Math.LN10)), err = m / span * step; + if (err <= .15) step *= 10; else if (err <= .35) step *= 5; else if (err <= .75) step *= 2; + extent[0] = Math.ceil(extent[0] / step) * step; + extent[1] = Math.floor(extent[1] / step) * step + step * .5; + extent[2] = step; + return extent; + } + function d3_scale_linearTicks(domain, m) { + return d3.range.apply(d3, d3_scale_linearTickRange(domain, m)); + } + function d3_scale_linearTickFormat(domain, m, format) { + var range = d3_scale_linearTickRange(domain, m); + if (format) { + var match = d3_format_re.exec(format); + match.shift(); + if (match[8] === "s") { + var prefix = d3.formatPrefix(Math.max(abs(range[0]), abs(range[1]))); + if (!match[7]) match[7] = "." + d3_scale_linearPrecision(prefix.scale(range[2])); + match[8] = "f"; + format = d3.format(match.join("")); + return function(d) { + return format(prefix.scale(d)) + prefix.symbol; + }; + } + if (!match[7]) match[7] = "." + d3_scale_linearFormatPrecision(match[8], range); + format = match.join(""); + } else { + format = ",." + d3_scale_linearPrecision(range[2]) + "f"; + } + return d3.format(format); + } + var d3_scale_linearFormatSignificant = { + s: 1, + g: 1, + p: 1, + r: 1, + e: 1 + }; + function d3_scale_linearPrecision(value) { + return -Math.floor(Math.log(value) / Math.LN10 + .01); + } + function d3_scale_linearFormatPrecision(type, range) { + var p = d3_scale_linearPrecision(range[2]); + return type in d3_scale_linearFormatSignificant ? Math.abs(p - d3_scale_linearPrecision(Math.max(abs(range[0]), abs(range[1])))) + +(type !== "e") : p - (type === "%") * 2; + } + d3.scale.log = function() { + return d3_scale_log(d3.scale.linear().domain([ 0, 1 ]), 10, true, [ 1, 10 ]); + }; + function d3_scale_log(linear, base, positive, domain) { + function log(x) { + return (positive ? Math.log(x < 0 ? 0 : x) : -Math.log(x > 0 ? 0 : -x)) / Math.log(base); + } + function pow(x) { + return positive ? Math.pow(base, x) : -Math.pow(base, -x); + } + function scale(x) { + return linear(log(x)); + } + scale.invert = function(x) { + return pow(linear.invert(x)); + }; + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + positive = x[0] >= 0; + linear.domain((domain = x.map(Number)).map(log)); + return scale; + }; + scale.base = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return base; + base = +_; + linear.domain(domain.map(log)); + return scale; + }; + scale.nice = function() { + var niced = d3_scale_nice(domain.map(log), positive ? Math : d3_scale_logNiceNegative); + linear.domain(niced); + domain = niced.map(pow); + return scale; + }; + scale.ticks = function() { + var extent = d3_scaleExtent(domain), ticks = [], u = extent[0], v = extent[1], i = Math.floor(log(u)), j = Math.ceil(log(v)), n = base % 1 ? 2 : base; + if (isFinite(j - i)) { + if (positive) { + for (;i < j; i++) for (var k = 1; k < n; k++) ticks.push(pow(i) * k); + ticks.push(pow(i)); + } else { + ticks.push(pow(i)); + for (;i++ < j; ) for (var k = n - 1; k > 0; k--) ticks.push(pow(i) * k); + } + for (i = 0; ticks[i] < u; i++) {} + for (j = ticks.length; ticks[j - 1] > v; j--) {} + ticks = ticks.slice(i, j); + } + return ticks; + }; + scale.tickFormat = function(n, format) { + if (!arguments.length) return d3_scale_logFormat; + if (arguments.length < 2) format = d3_scale_logFormat; else if (typeof format !== "function") format = d3.format(format); + var k = Math.max(.1, n / scale.ticks().length), f = positive ? (e = 1e-12, Math.ceil) : (e = -1e-12, + Math.floor), e; + return function(d) { + return d / pow(f(log(d) + e)) <= k ? format(d) : ""; + }; + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_log(linear.copy(), base, positive, domain); + }; + return d3_scale_linearRebind(scale, linear); + } + var d3_scale_logFormat = d3.format(".0e"), d3_scale_logNiceNegative = { + floor: function(x) { + return -Math.ceil(-x); + }, + ceil: function(x) { + return -Math.floor(-x); + } + }; + d3.scale.pow = function() { + return d3_scale_pow(d3.scale.linear(), 1, [ 0, 1 ]); + }; + function d3_scale_pow(linear, exponent, domain) { + var powp = d3_scale_powPow(exponent), powb = d3_scale_powPow(1 / exponent); + function scale(x) { + return linear(powp(x)); + } + scale.invert = function(x) { + return powb(linear.invert(x)); + }; + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + linear.domain((domain = x.map(Number)).map(powp)); + return scale; + }; + scale.ticks = function(m) { + return d3_scale_linearTicks(domain, m); + }; + scale.tickFormat = function(m, format) { + return d3_scale_linearTickFormat(domain, m, format); + }; + scale.nice = function(m) { + return scale.domain(d3_scale_linearNice(domain, m)); + }; + scale.exponent = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return exponent; + powp = d3_scale_powPow(exponent = x); + powb = d3_scale_powPow(1 / exponent); + linear.domain(domain.map(powp)); + return scale; + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_pow(linear.copy(), exponent, domain); + }; + return d3_scale_linearRebind(scale, linear); + } + function d3_scale_powPow(e) { + return function(x) { + return x < 0 ? -Math.pow(-x, e) : Math.pow(x, e); + }; + } + d3.scale.sqrt = function() { + return d3.scale.pow().exponent(.5); + }; + d3.scale.ordinal = function() { + return d3_scale_ordinal([], { + t: "range", + a: [ [] ] + }); + }; + function d3_scale_ordinal(domain, ranger) { + var index, range, rangeBand; + function scale(x) { + return range[((index.get(x) || (ranger.t === "range" ? index.set(x, domain.push(x)) : NaN)) - 1) % range.length]; + } + function steps(start, step) { + return d3.range(domain.length).map(function(i) { + return start + step * i; + }); + } + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + domain = []; + index = new d3_Map(); + var i = -1, n = x.length, xi; + while (++i < n) if (!index.has(xi = x[i])) index.set(xi, domain.push(xi)); + return scale[ranger.t].apply(scale, ranger.a); + }; + scale.range = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return range; + range = x; + rangeBand = 0; + ranger = { + t: "range", + a: arguments + }; + return scale; + }; + scale.rangePoints = function(x, padding) { + if (arguments.length < 2) padding = 0; + var start = x[0], stop = x[1], step = (stop - start) / (Math.max(1, domain.length - 1) + padding); + range = steps(domain.length < 2 ? (start + stop) / 2 : start + step * padding / 2, step); + rangeBand = 0; + ranger = { + t: "rangePoints", + a: arguments + }; + return scale; + }; + scale.rangeBands = function(x, padding, outerPadding) { + if (arguments.length < 2) padding = 0; + if (arguments.length < 3) outerPadding = padding; + var reverse = x[1] < x[0], start = x[reverse - 0], stop = x[1 - reverse], step = (stop - start) / (domain.length - padding + 2 * outerPadding); + range = steps(start + step * outerPadding, step); + if (reverse) range.reverse(); + rangeBand = step * (1 - padding); + ranger = { + t: "rangeBands", + a: arguments + }; + return scale; + }; + scale.rangeRoundBands = function(x, padding, outerPadding) { + if (arguments.length < 2) padding = 0; + if (arguments.length < 3) outerPadding = padding; + var reverse = x[1] < x[0], start = x[reverse - 0], stop = x[1 - reverse], step = Math.floor((stop - start) / (domain.length - padding + 2 * outerPadding)), error = stop - start - (domain.length - padding) * step; + range = steps(start + Math.round(error / 2), step); + if (reverse) range.reverse(); + rangeBand = Math.round(step * (1 - padding)); + ranger = { + t: "rangeRoundBands", + a: arguments + }; + return scale; + }; + scale.rangeBand = function() { + return rangeBand; + }; + scale.rangeExtent = function() { + return d3_scaleExtent(ranger.a[0]); + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_ordinal(domain, ranger); + }; + return scale.domain(domain); + } + d3.scale.category10 = function() { + return d3.scale.ordinal().range(d3_category10); + }; + d3.scale.category20 = function() { + return d3.scale.ordinal().range(d3_category20); + }; + d3.scale.category20b = function() { + return d3.scale.ordinal().range(d3_category20b); + }; + d3.scale.category20c = function() { + return d3.scale.ordinal().range(d3_category20c); + }; + var d3_category10 = [ 2062260, 16744206, 2924588, 14034728, 9725885, 9197131, 14907330, 8355711, 12369186, 1556175 ].map(d3_rgbString); + var d3_category20 = [ 2062260, 11454440, 16744206, 16759672, 2924588, 10018698, 14034728, 16750742, 9725885, 12955861, 9197131, 12885140, 14907330, 16234194, 8355711, 13092807, 12369186, 14408589, 1556175, 10410725 ].map(d3_rgbString); + var d3_category20b = [ 3750777, 5395619, 7040719, 10264286, 6519097, 9216594, 11915115, 13556636, 9202993, 12426809, 15186514, 15190932, 8666169, 11356490, 14049643, 15177372, 8077683, 10834324, 13528509, 14589654 ].map(d3_rgbString); + var d3_category20c = [ 3244733, 7057110, 10406625, 13032431, 15095053, 16616764, 16625259, 16634018, 3253076, 7652470, 10607003, 13101504, 7695281, 10394312, 12369372, 14342891, 6513507, 9868950, 12434877, 14277081 ].map(d3_rgbString); + d3.scale.quantile = function() { + return d3_scale_quantile([], []); + }; + function d3_scale_quantile(domain, range) { + var thresholds; + function rescale() { + var k = 0, q = range.length; + thresholds = []; + while (++k < q) thresholds[k - 1] = d3.quantile(domain, k / q); + return scale; + } + function scale(x) { + if (!isNaN(x = +x)) return range[d3.bisect(thresholds, x)]; + } + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + domain = x.filter(d3_number).sort(d3_ascending); + return rescale(); + }; + scale.range = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return range; + range = x; + return rescale(); + }; + scale.quantiles = function() { + return thresholds; + }; + scale.invertExtent = function(y) { + y = range.indexOf(y); + return y < 0 ? [ NaN, NaN ] : [ y > 0 ? thresholds[y - 1] : domain[0], y < thresholds.length ? thresholds[y] : domain[domain.length - 1] ]; + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_quantile(domain, range); + }; + return rescale(); + } + d3.scale.quantize = function() { + return d3_scale_quantize(0, 1, [ 0, 1 ]); + }; + function d3_scale_quantize(x0, x1, range) { + var kx, i; + function scale(x) { + return range[Math.max(0, Math.min(i, Math.floor(kx * (x - x0))))]; + } + function rescale() { + kx = range.length / (x1 - x0); + i = range.length - 1; + return scale; + } + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return [ x0, x1 ]; + x0 = +x[0]; + x1 = +x[x.length - 1]; + return rescale(); + }; + scale.range = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return range; + range = x; + return rescale(); + }; + scale.invertExtent = function(y) { + y = range.indexOf(y); + y = y < 0 ? NaN : y / kx + x0; + return [ y, y + 1 / kx ]; + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_quantize(x0, x1, range); + }; + return rescale(); + } + d3.scale.threshold = function() { + return d3_scale_threshold([ .5 ], [ 0, 1 ]); + }; + function d3_scale_threshold(domain, range) { + function scale(x) { + if (x <= x) return range[d3.bisect(domain, x)]; + } + scale.domain = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + domain = _; + return scale; + }; + scale.range = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return range; + range = _; + return scale; + }; + scale.invertExtent = function(y) { + y = range.indexOf(y); + return [ domain[y - 1], domain[y] ]; + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_threshold(domain, range); + }; + return scale; + } + d3.scale.identity = function() { + return d3_scale_identity([ 0, 1 ]); + }; + function d3_scale_identity(domain) { + function identity(x) { + return +x; + } + identity.invert = identity; + identity.domain = identity.range = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return domain; + domain = x.map(identity); + return identity; + }; + identity.ticks = function(m) { + return d3_scale_linearTicks(domain, m); + }; + identity.tickFormat = function(m, format) { + return d3_scale_linearTickFormat(domain, m, format); + }; + identity.copy = function() { + return d3_scale_identity(domain); + }; + return identity; + } + d3.svg = {}; + d3.svg.arc = function() { + var innerRadius = d3_svg_arcInnerRadius, outerRadius = d3_svg_arcOuterRadius, startAngle = d3_svg_arcStartAngle, endAngle = d3_svg_arcEndAngle; + function arc() { + var r0 = innerRadius.apply(this, arguments), r1 = outerRadius.apply(this, arguments), a0 = startAngle.apply(this, arguments) + d3_svg_arcOffset, a1 = endAngle.apply(this, arguments) + d3_svg_arcOffset, da = (a1 < a0 && (da = a0, + a0 = a1, a1 = da), a1 - a0), df = da < π ? "0" : "1", c0 = Math.cos(a0), s0 = Math.sin(a0), c1 = Math.cos(a1), s1 = Math.sin(a1); + return da >= d3_svg_arcMax ? r0 ? "M0," + r1 + "A" + r1 + "," + r1 + " 0 1,1 0," + -r1 + "A" + r1 + "," + r1 + " 0 1,1 0," + r1 + "M0," + r0 + "A" + r0 + "," + r0 + " 0 1,0 0," + -r0 + "A" + r0 + "," + r0 + " 0 1,0 0," + r0 + "Z" : "M0," + r1 + "A" + r1 + "," + r1 + " 0 1,1 0," + -r1 + "A" + r1 + "," + r1 + " 0 1,1 0," + r1 + "Z" : r0 ? "M" + r1 * c0 + "," + r1 * s0 + "A" + r1 + "," + r1 + " 0 " + df + ",1 " + r1 * c1 + "," + r1 * s1 + "L" + r0 * c1 + "," + r0 * s1 + "A" + r0 + "," + r0 + " 0 " + df + ",0 " + r0 * c0 + "," + r0 * s0 + "Z" : "M" + r1 * c0 + "," + r1 * s0 + "A" + r1 + "," + r1 + " 0 " + df + ",1 " + r1 * c1 + "," + r1 * s1 + "L0,0" + "Z"; + } + arc.innerRadius = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return innerRadius; + innerRadius = d3_functor(v); + return arc; + }; + arc.outerRadius = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return outerRadius; + outerRadius = d3_functor(v); + return arc; + }; + arc.startAngle = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return startAngle; + startAngle = d3_functor(v); + return arc; + }; + arc.endAngle = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return endAngle; + endAngle = d3_functor(v); + return arc; + }; + arc.centroid = function() { + var r = (innerRadius.apply(this, arguments) + outerRadius.apply(this, arguments)) / 2, a = (startAngle.apply(this, arguments) + endAngle.apply(this, arguments)) / 2 + d3_svg_arcOffset; + return [ Math.cos(a) * r, Math.sin(a) * r ]; + }; + return arc; + }; + var d3_svg_arcOffset = -halfπ, d3_svg_arcMax = τ - ε; + function d3_svg_arcInnerRadius(d) { + return d.innerRadius; + } + function d3_svg_arcOuterRadius(d) { + return d.outerRadius; + } + function d3_svg_arcStartAngle(d) { + return d.startAngle; + } + function d3_svg_arcEndAngle(d) { + return d.endAngle; + } + function d3_svg_line(projection) { + var x = d3_geom_pointX, y = d3_geom_pointY, defined = d3_true, interpolate = d3_svg_lineLinear, interpolateKey = interpolate.key, tension = .7; + function line(data) { + var segments = [], points = [], i = -1, n = data.length, d, fx = d3_functor(x), fy = d3_functor(y); + function segment() { + segments.push("M", interpolate(projection(points), tension)); + } + while (++i < n) { + if (defined.call(this, d = data[i], i)) { + points.push([ +fx.call(this, d, i), +fy.call(this, d, i) ]); + } else if (points.length) { + segment(); + points = []; + } + } + if (points.length) segment(); + return segments.length ? segments.join("") : null; + } + line.x = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return x; + x = _; + return line; + }; + line.y = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return y; + y = _; + return line; + }; + line.defined = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return defined; + defined = _; + return line; + }; + line.interpolate = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return interpolateKey; + if (typeof _ === "function") interpolateKey = interpolate = _; else interpolateKey = (interpolate = d3_svg_lineInterpolators.get(_) || d3_svg_lineLinear).key; + return line; + }; + line.tension = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return tension; + tension = _; + return line; + }; + return line; + } + d3.svg.line = function() { + return d3_svg_line(d3_identity); + }; + var d3_svg_lineInterpolators = d3.map({ + linear: d3_svg_lineLinear, + "linear-closed": d3_svg_lineLinearClosed, + step: d3_svg_lineStep, + "step-before": d3_svg_lineStepBefore, + "step-after": d3_svg_lineStepAfter, + basis: d3_svg_lineBasis, + "basis-open": d3_svg_lineBasisOpen, + "basis-closed": d3_svg_lineBasisClosed, + bundle: d3_svg_lineBundle, + cardinal: d3_svg_lineCardinal, + "cardinal-open": d3_svg_lineCardinalOpen, + "cardinal-closed": d3_svg_lineCardinalClosed, + monotone: d3_svg_lineMonotone + }); + d3_svg_lineInterpolators.forEach(function(key, value) { + value.key = key; + value.closed = /-closed$/.test(key); + }); + function d3_svg_lineLinear(points) { + return points.join("L"); + } + function d3_svg_lineLinearClosed(points) { + return d3_svg_lineLinear(points) + "Z"; + } + function d3_svg_lineStep(points) { + var i = 0, n = points.length, p = points[0], path = [ p[0], ",", p[1] ]; + while (++i < n) path.push("H", (p[0] + (p = points[i])[0]) / 2, "V", p[1]); + if (n > 1) path.push("H", p[0]); + return path.join(""); + } + function d3_svg_lineStepBefore(points) { + var i = 0, n = points.length, p = points[0], path = [ p[0], ",", p[1] ]; + while (++i < n) path.push("V", (p = points[i])[1], "H", p[0]); + return path.join(""); + } + function d3_svg_lineStepAfter(points) { + var i = 0, n = points.length, p = points[0], path = [ p[0], ",", p[1] ]; + while (++i < n) path.push("H", (p = points[i])[0], "V", p[1]); + return path.join(""); + } + function d3_svg_lineCardinalOpen(points, tension) { + return points.length < 4 ? d3_svg_lineLinear(points) : points[1] + d3_svg_lineHermite(points.slice(1, points.length - 1), d3_svg_lineCardinalTangents(points, tension)); + } + function d3_svg_lineCardinalClosed(points, tension) { + return points.length < 3 ? d3_svg_lineLinear(points) : points[0] + d3_svg_lineHermite((points.push(points[0]), + points), d3_svg_lineCardinalTangents([ points[points.length - 2] ].concat(points, [ points[1] ]), tension)); + } + function d3_svg_lineCardinal(points, tension) { + return points.length < 3 ? d3_svg_lineLinear(points) : points[0] + d3_svg_lineHermite(points, d3_svg_lineCardinalTangents(points, tension)); + } + function d3_svg_lineHermite(points, tangents) { + if (tangents.length < 1 || points.length != tangents.length && points.length != tangents.length + 2) { + return d3_svg_lineLinear(points); + } + var quad = points.length != tangents.length, path = "", p0 = points[0], p = points[1], t0 = tangents[0], t = t0, pi = 1; + if (quad) { + path += "Q" + (p[0] - t0[0] * 2 / 3) + "," + (p[1] - t0[1] * 2 / 3) + "," + p[0] + "," + p[1]; + p0 = points[1]; + pi = 2; + } + if (tangents.length > 1) { + t = tangents[1]; + p = points[pi]; + pi++; + path += "C" + (p0[0] + t0[0]) + "," + (p0[1] + t0[1]) + "," + (p[0] - t[0]) + "," + (p[1] - t[1]) + "," + p[0] + "," + p[1]; + for (var i = 2; i < tangents.length; i++, pi++) { + p = points[pi]; + t = tangents[i]; + path += "S" + (p[0] - t[0]) + "," + (p[1] - t[1]) + "," + p[0] + "," + p[1]; + } + } + if (quad) { + var lp = points[pi]; + path += "Q" + (p[0] + t[0] * 2 / 3) + "," + (p[1] + t[1] * 2 / 3) + "," + lp[0] + "," + lp[1]; + } + return path; + } + function d3_svg_lineCardinalTangents(points, tension) { + var tangents = [], a = (1 - tension) / 2, p0, p1 = points[0], p2 = points[1], i = 1, n = points.length; + while (++i < n) { + p0 = p1; + p1 = p2; + p2 = points[i]; + tangents.push([ a * (p2[0] - p0[0]), a * (p2[1] - p0[1]) ]); + } + return tangents; + } + function d3_svg_lineBasis(points) { + if (points.length < 3) return d3_svg_lineLinear(points); + var i = 1, n = points.length, pi = points[0], x0 = pi[0], y0 = pi[1], px = [ x0, x0, x0, (pi = points[1])[0] ], py = [ y0, y0, y0, pi[1] ], path = [ x0, ",", y0, "L", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, px), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, py) ]; + points.push(points[n - 1]); + while (++i <= n) { + pi = points[i]; + px.shift(); + px.push(pi[0]); + py.shift(); + py.push(pi[1]); + d3_svg_lineBasisBezier(path, px, py); + } + points.pop(); + path.push("L", pi); + return path.join(""); + } + function d3_svg_lineBasisOpen(points) { + if (points.length < 4) return d3_svg_lineLinear(points); + var path = [], i = -1, n = points.length, pi, px = [ 0 ], py = [ 0 ]; + while (++i < 3) { + pi = points[i]; + px.push(pi[0]); + py.push(pi[1]); + } + path.push(d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, px) + "," + d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, py)); + --i; + while (++i < n) { + pi = points[i]; + px.shift(); + px.push(pi[0]); + py.shift(); + py.push(pi[1]); + d3_svg_lineBasisBezier(path, px, py); + } + return path.join(""); + } + function d3_svg_lineBasisClosed(points) { + var path, i = -1, n = points.length, m = n + 4, pi, px = [], py = []; + while (++i < 4) { + pi = points[i % n]; + px.push(pi[0]); + py.push(pi[1]); + } + path = [ d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, px), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, py) ]; + --i; + while (++i < m) { + pi = points[i % n]; + px.shift(); + px.push(pi[0]); + py.shift(); + py.push(pi[1]); + d3_svg_lineBasisBezier(path, px, py); + } + return path.join(""); + } + function d3_svg_lineBundle(points, tension) { + var n = points.length - 1; + if (n) { + var x0 = points[0][0], y0 = points[0][1], dx = points[n][0] - x0, dy = points[n][1] - y0, i = -1, p, t; + while (++i <= n) { + p = points[i]; + t = i / n; + p[0] = tension * p[0] + (1 - tension) * (x0 + t * dx); + p[1] = tension * p[1] + (1 - tension) * (y0 + t * dy); + } + } + return d3_svg_lineBasis(points); + } + function d3_svg_lineDot4(a, b) { + return a[0] * b[0] + a[1] * b[1] + a[2] * b[2] + a[3] * b[3]; + } + var d3_svg_lineBasisBezier1 = [ 0, 2 / 3, 1 / 3, 0 ], d3_svg_lineBasisBezier2 = [ 0, 1 / 3, 2 / 3, 0 ], d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3 = [ 0, 1 / 6, 2 / 3, 1 / 6 ]; + function d3_svg_lineBasisBezier(path, x, y) { + path.push("C", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier1, x), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier1, y), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier2, x), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier2, y), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, x), ",", d3_svg_lineDot4(d3_svg_lineBasisBezier3, y)); + } + function d3_svg_lineSlope(p0, p1) { + return (p1[1] - p0[1]) / (p1[0] - p0[0]); + } + function d3_svg_lineFiniteDifferences(points) { + var i = 0, j = points.length - 1, m = [], p0 = points[0], p1 = points[1], d = m[0] = d3_svg_lineSlope(p0, p1); + while (++i < j) { + m[i] = (d + (d = d3_svg_lineSlope(p0 = p1, p1 = points[i + 1]))) / 2; + } + m[i] = d; + return m; + } + function d3_svg_lineMonotoneTangents(points) { + var tangents = [], d, a, b, s, m = d3_svg_lineFiniteDifferences(points), i = -1, j = points.length - 1; + while (++i < j) { + d = d3_svg_lineSlope(points[i], points[i + 1]); + if (abs(d) < ε) { + m[i] = m[i + 1] = 0; + } else { + a = m[i] / d; + b = m[i + 1] / d; + s = a * a + b * b; + if (s > 9) { + s = d * 3 / Math.sqrt(s); + m[i] = s * a; + m[i + 1] = s * b; + } + } + } + i = -1; + while (++i <= j) { + s = (points[Math.min(j, i + 1)][0] - points[Math.max(0, i - 1)][0]) / (6 * (1 + m[i] * m[i])); + tangents.push([ s || 0, m[i] * s || 0 ]); + } + return tangents; + } + function d3_svg_lineMonotone(points) { + return points.length < 3 ? d3_svg_lineLinear(points) : points[0] + d3_svg_lineHermite(points, d3_svg_lineMonotoneTangents(points)); + } + d3.svg.line.radial = function() { + var line = d3_svg_line(d3_svg_lineRadial); + line.radius = line.x, delete line.x; + line.angle = line.y, delete line.y; + return line; + }; + function d3_svg_lineRadial(points) { + var point, i = -1, n = points.length, r, a; + while (++i < n) { + point = points[i]; + r = point[0]; + a = point[1] + d3_svg_arcOffset; + point[0] = r * Math.cos(a); + point[1] = r * Math.sin(a); + } + return points; + } + function d3_svg_area(projection) { + var x0 = d3_geom_pointX, x1 = d3_geom_pointX, y0 = 0, y1 = d3_geom_pointY, defined = d3_true, interpolate = d3_svg_lineLinear, interpolateKey = interpolate.key, interpolateReverse = interpolate, L = "L", tension = .7; + function area(data) { + var segments = [], points0 = [], points1 = [], i = -1, n = data.length, d, fx0 = d3_functor(x0), fy0 = d3_functor(y0), fx1 = x0 === x1 ? function() { + return x; + } : d3_functor(x1), fy1 = y0 === y1 ? function() { + return y; + } : d3_functor(y1), x, y; + function segment() { + segments.push("M", interpolate(projection(points1), tension), L, interpolateReverse(projection(points0.reverse()), tension), "Z"); + } + while (++i < n) { + if (defined.call(this, d = data[i], i)) { + points0.push([ x = +fx0.call(this, d, i), y = +fy0.call(this, d, i) ]); + points1.push([ +fx1.call(this, d, i), +fy1.call(this, d, i) ]); + } else if (points0.length) { + segment(); + points0 = []; + points1 = []; + } + } + if (points0.length) segment(); + return segments.length ? segments.join("") : null; + } + area.x = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return x1; + x0 = x1 = _; + return area; + }; + area.x0 = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return x0; + x0 = _; + return area; + }; + area.x1 = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return x1; + x1 = _; + return area; + }; + area.y = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return y1; + y0 = y1 = _; + return area; + }; + area.y0 = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return y0; + y0 = _; + return area; + }; + area.y1 = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return y1; + y1 = _; + return area; + }; + area.defined = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return defined; + defined = _; + return area; + }; + area.interpolate = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return interpolateKey; + if (typeof _ === "function") interpolateKey = interpolate = _; else interpolateKey = (interpolate = d3_svg_lineInterpolators.get(_) || d3_svg_lineLinear).key; + interpolateReverse = interpolate.reverse || interpolate; + L = interpolate.closed ? "M" : "L"; + return area; + }; + area.tension = function(_) { + if (!arguments.length) return tension; + tension = _; + return area; + }; + return area; + } + d3_svg_lineStepBefore.reverse = d3_svg_lineStepAfter; + d3_svg_lineStepAfter.reverse = d3_svg_lineStepBefore; + d3.svg.area = function() { + return d3_svg_area(d3_identity); + }; + d3.svg.area.radial = function() { + var area = d3_svg_area(d3_svg_lineRadial); + area.radius = area.x, delete area.x; + area.innerRadius = area.x0, delete area.x0; + area.outerRadius = area.x1, delete area.x1; + area.angle = area.y, delete area.y; + area.startAngle = area.y0, delete area.y0; + area.endAngle = area.y1, delete area.y1; + return area; + }; + d3.svg.chord = function() { + var source = d3_source, target = d3_target, radius = d3_svg_chordRadius, startAngle = d3_svg_arcStartAngle, endAngle = d3_svg_arcEndAngle; + function chord(d, i) { + var s = subgroup(this, source, d, i), t = subgroup(this, target, d, i); + return "M" + s.p0 + arc(s.r, s.p1, s.a1 - s.a0) + (equals(s, t) ? curve(s.r, s.p1, s.r, s.p0) : curve(s.r, s.p1, t.r, t.p0) + arc(t.r, t.p1, t.a1 - t.a0) + curve(t.r, t.p1, s.r, s.p0)) + "Z"; + } + function subgroup(self, f, d, i) { + var subgroup = f.call(self, d, i), r = radius.call(self, subgroup, i), a0 = startAngle.call(self, subgroup, i) + d3_svg_arcOffset, a1 = endAngle.call(self, subgroup, i) + d3_svg_arcOffset; + return { + r: r, + a0: a0, + a1: a1, + p0: [ r * Math.cos(a0), r * Math.sin(a0) ], + p1: [ r * Math.cos(a1), r * Math.sin(a1) ] + }; + } + function equals(a, b) { + return a.a0 == b.a0 && a.a1 == b.a1; + } + function arc(r, p, a) { + return "A" + r + "," + r + " 0 " + +(a > π) + ",1 " + p; + } + function curve(r0, p0, r1, p1) { + return "Q 0,0 " + p1; + } + chord.radius = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return radius; + radius = d3_functor(v); + return chord; + }; + chord.source = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return source; + source = d3_functor(v); + return chord; + }; + chord.target = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return target; + target = d3_functor(v); + return chord; + }; + chord.startAngle = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return startAngle; + startAngle = d3_functor(v); + return chord; + }; + chord.endAngle = function(v) { + if (!arguments.length) return endAngle; + endAngle = d3_functor(v); + return chord; + }; + return chord; + }; + function d3_svg_chordRadius(d) { + return d.radius; + } + d3.svg.diagonal = function() { + var source = d3_source, target = d3_target, projection = d3_svg_diagonalProjection; + function diagonal(d, i) { + var p0 = source.call(this, d, i), p3 = target.call(this, d, i), m = (p0.y + p3.y) / 2, p = [ p0, { + x: p0.x, + y: m + }, { + x: p3.x, + y: m + }, p3 ]; + p = p.map(projection); + return "M" + p[0] + "C" + p[1] + " " + p[2] + " " + p[3]; + } + diagonal.source = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return source; + source = d3_functor(x); + return diagonal; + }; + diagonal.target = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return target; + target = d3_functor(x); + return diagonal; + }; + diagonal.projection = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return projection; + projection = x; + return diagonal; + }; + return diagonal; + }; + function d3_svg_diagonalProjection(d) { + return [ d.x, d.y ]; + } + d3.svg.diagonal.radial = function() { + var diagonal = d3.svg.diagonal(), projection = d3_svg_diagonalProjection, projection_ = diagonal.projection; + diagonal.projection = function(x) { + return arguments.length ? projection_(d3_svg_diagonalRadialProjection(projection = x)) : projection; + }; + return diagonal; + }; + function d3_svg_diagonalRadialProjection(projection) { + return function() { + var d = projection.apply(this, arguments), r = d[0], a = d[1] + d3_svg_arcOffset; + return [ r * Math.cos(a), r * Math.sin(a) ]; + }; + } + d3.svg.symbol = function() { + var type = d3_svg_symbolType, size = d3_svg_symbolSize; + function symbol(d, i) { + return (d3_svg_symbols.get(type.call(this, d, i)) || d3_svg_symbolCircle)(size.call(this, d, i)); + } + symbol.type = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return type; + type = d3_functor(x); + return symbol; + }; + symbol.size = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return size; + size = d3_functor(x); + return symbol; + }; + return symbol; + }; + function d3_svg_symbolSize() { + return 64; + } + function d3_svg_symbolType() { + return "circle"; + } + function d3_svg_symbolCircle(size) { + var r = Math.sqrt(size / π); + return "M0," + r + "A" + r + "," + r + " 0 1,1 0," + -r + "A" + r + "," + r + " 0 1,1 0," + r + "Z"; + } + var d3_svg_symbols = d3.map({ + circle: d3_svg_symbolCircle, + cross: function(size) { + var r = Math.sqrt(size / 5) / 2; + return "M" + -3 * r + "," + -r + "H" + -r + "V" + -3 * r + "H" + r + "V" + -r + "H" + 3 * r + "V" + r + "H" + r + "V" + 3 * r + "H" + -r + "V" + r + "H" + -3 * r + "Z"; + }, + diamond: function(size) { + var ry = Math.sqrt(size / (2 * d3_svg_symbolTan30)), rx = ry * d3_svg_symbolTan30; + return "M0," + -ry + "L" + rx + ",0" + " 0," + ry + " " + -rx + ",0" + "Z"; + }, + square: function(size) { + var r = Math.sqrt(size) / 2; + return "M" + -r + "," + -r + "L" + r + "," + -r + " " + r + "," + r + " " + -r + "," + r + "Z"; + }, + "triangle-down": function(size) { + var rx = Math.sqrt(size / d3_svg_symbolSqrt3), ry = rx * d3_svg_symbolSqrt3 / 2; + return "M0," + ry + "L" + rx + "," + -ry + " " + -rx + "," + -ry + "Z"; + }, + "triangle-up": function(size) { + var rx = Math.sqrt(size / d3_svg_symbolSqrt3), ry = rx * d3_svg_symbolSqrt3 / 2; + return "M0," + -ry + "L" + rx + "," + ry + " " + -rx + "," + ry + "Z"; + } + }); + d3.svg.symbolTypes = d3_svg_symbols.keys(); + var d3_svg_symbolSqrt3 = Math.sqrt(3), d3_svg_symbolTan30 = Math.tan(30 * d3_radians); + function d3_transition(groups, id) { + d3_subclass(groups, d3_transitionPrototype); + groups.id = id; + return groups; + } + var d3_transitionPrototype = [], d3_transitionId = 0, d3_transitionInheritId, d3_transitionInherit; + d3_transitionPrototype.call = d3_selectionPrototype.call; + d3_transitionPrototype.empty = d3_selectionPrototype.empty; + d3_transitionPrototype.node = d3_selectionPrototype.node; + d3_transitionPrototype.size = d3_selectionPrototype.size; + d3.transition = function(selection) { + return arguments.length ? d3_transitionInheritId ? selection.transition() : selection : d3_selectionRoot.transition(); + }; + d3.transition.prototype = d3_transitionPrototype; + d3_transitionPrototype.select = function(selector) { + var id = this.id, subgroups = [], subgroup, subnode, node; + selector = d3_selection_selector(selector); + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + for (var group = this[j], i = -1, n = group.length; ++i < n; ) { + if ((node = group[i]) && (subnode = selector.call(node, node.__data__, i, j))) { + if ("__data__" in node) subnode.__data__ = node.__data__; + d3_transitionNode(subnode, i, id, node.__transition__[id]); + subgroup.push(subnode); + } else { + subgroup.push(null); + } + } + } + return d3_transition(subgroups, id); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.selectAll = function(selector) { + var id = this.id, subgroups = [], subgroup, subnodes, node, subnode, transition; + selector = d3_selection_selectorAll(selector); + for (var j = -1, m = this.length; ++j < m; ) { + for (var group = this[j], i = -1, n = group.length; ++i < n; ) { + if (node = group[i]) { + transition = node.__transition__[id]; + subnodes = selector.call(node, node.__data__, i, j); + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + for (var k = -1, o = subnodes.length; ++k < o; ) { + if (subnode = subnodes[k]) d3_transitionNode(subnode, k, id, transition); + subgroup.push(subnode); + } + } + } + } + return d3_transition(subgroups, id); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.filter = function(filter) { + var subgroups = [], subgroup, group, node; + if (typeof filter !== "function") filter = d3_selection_filter(filter); + for (var j = 0, m = this.length; j < m; j++) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + for (var group = this[j], i = 0, n = group.length; i < n; i++) { + if ((node = group[i]) && filter.call(node, node.__data__, i, j)) { + subgroup.push(node); + } + } + } + return d3_transition(subgroups, this.id); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.tween = function(name, tween) { + var id = this.id; + if (arguments.length < 2) return this.node().__transition__[id].tween.get(name); + return d3_selection_each(this, tween == null ? function(node) { + node.__transition__[id].tween.remove(name); + } : function(node) { + node.__transition__[id].tween.set(name, tween); + }); + }; + function d3_transition_tween(groups, name, value, tween) { + var id = groups.id; + return d3_selection_each(groups, typeof value === "function" ? function(node, i, j) { + node.__transition__[id].tween.set(name, tween(value.call(node, node.__data__, i, j))); + } : (value = tween(value), function(node) { + node.__transition__[id].tween.set(name, value); + })); + } + d3_transitionPrototype.attr = function(nameNS, value) { + if (arguments.length < 2) { + for (value in nameNS) this.attr(value, nameNS[value]); + return this; + } + var interpolate = nameNS == "transform" ? d3_interpolateTransform : d3_interpolate, name = d3.ns.qualify(nameNS); + function attrNull() { + this.removeAttribute(name); + } + function attrNullNS() { + this.removeAttributeNS(name.space, name.local); + } + function attrTween(b) { + return b == null ? attrNull : (b += "", function() { + var a = this.getAttribute(name), i; + return a !== b && (i = interpolate(a, b), function(t) { + this.setAttribute(name, i(t)); + }); + }); + } + function attrTweenNS(b) { + return b == null ? attrNullNS : (b += "", function() { + var a = this.getAttributeNS(name.space, name.local), i; + return a !== b && (i = interpolate(a, b), function(t) { + this.setAttributeNS(name.space, name.local, i(t)); + }); + }); + } + return d3_transition_tween(this, "attr." + nameNS, value, name.local ? attrTweenNS : attrTween); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.attrTween = function(nameNS, tween) { + var name = d3.ns.qualify(nameNS); + function attrTween(d, i) { + var f = tween.call(this, d, i, this.getAttribute(name)); + return f && function(t) { + this.setAttribute(name, f(t)); + }; + } + function attrTweenNS(d, i) { + var f = tween.call(this, d, i, this.getAttributeNS(name.space, name.local)); + return f && function(t) { + this.setAttributeNS(name.space, name.local, f(t)); + }; + } + return this.tween("attr." + nameNS, name.local ? attrTweenNS : attrTween); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.style = function(name, value, priority) { + var n = arguments.length; + if (n < 3) { + if (typeof name !== "string") { + if (n < 2) value = ""; + for (priority in name) this.style(priority, name[priority], value); + return this; + } + priority = ""; + } + function styleNull() { + this.style.removeProperty(name); + } + function styleString(b) { + return b == null ? styleNull : (b += "", function() { + var a = d3_window.getComputedStyle(this, null).getPropertyValue(name), i; + return a !== b && (i = d3_interpolate(a, b), function(t) { + this.style.setProperty(name, i(t), priority); + }); + }); + } + return d3_transition_tween(this, "style." + name, value, styleString); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.styleTween = function(name, tween, priority) { + if (arguments.length < 3) priority = ""; + function styleTween(d, i) { + var f = tween.call(this, d, i, d3_window.getComputedStyle(this, null).getPropertyValue(name)); + return f && function(t) { + this.style.setProperty(name, f(t), priority); + }; + } + return this.tween("style." + name, styleTween); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.text = function(value) { + return d3_transition_tween(this, "text", value, d3_transition_text); + }; + function d3_transition_text(b) { + if (b == null) b = ""; + return function() { + this.textContent = b; + }; + } + d3_transitionPrototype.remove = function() { + return this.each("end.transition", function() { + var p; + if (this.__transition__.count < 2 && (p = this.parentNode)) p.removeChild(this); + }); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.ease = function(value) { + var id = this.id; + if (arguments.length < 1) return this.node().__transition__[id].ease; + if (typeof value !== "function") value = d3.ease.apply(d3, arguments); + return d3_selection_each(this, function(node) { + node.__transition__[id].ease = value; + }); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.delay = function(value) { + var id = this.id; + if (arguments.length < 1) return this.node().__transition__[id].delay; + return d3_selection_each(this, typeof value === "function" ? function(node, i, j) { + node.__transition__[id].delay = +value.call(node, node.__data__, i, j); + } : (value = +value, function(node) { + node.__transition__[id].delay = value; + })); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.duration = function(value) { + var id = this.id; + if (arguments.length < 1) return this.node().__transition__[id].duration; + return d3_selection_each(this, typeof value === "function" ? function(node, i, j) { + node.__transition__[id].duration = Math.max(1, value.call(node, node.__data__, i, j)); + } : (value = Math.max(1, value), function(node) { + node.__transition__[id].duration = value; + })); + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.each = function(type, listener) { + var id = this.id; + if (arguments.length < 2) { + var inherit = d3_transitionInherit, inheritId = d3_transitionInheritId; + d3_transitionInheritId = id; + d3_selection_each(this, function(node, i, j) { + d3_transitionInherit = node.__transition__[id]; + type.call(node, node.__data__, i, j); + }); + d3_transitionInherit = inherit; + d3_transitionInheritId = inheritId; + } else { + d3_selection_each(this, function(node) { + var transition = node.__transition__[id]; + (transition.event || (transition.event = d3.dispatch("start", "end"))).on(type, listener); + }); + } + return this; + }; + d3_transitionPrototype.transition = function() { + var id0 = this.id, id1 = ++d3_transitionId, subgroups = [], subgroup, group, node, transition; + for (var j = 0, m = this.length; j < m; j++) { + subgroups.push(subgroup = []); + for (var group = this[j], i = 0, n = group.length; i < n; i++) { + if (node = group[i]) { + transition = Object.create(node.__transition__[id0]); + transition.delay += transition.duration; + d3_transitionNode(node, i, id1, transition); + } + subgroup.push(node); + } + } + return d3_transition(subgroups, id1); + }; + function d3_transitionNode(node, i, id, inherit) { + var lock = node.__transition__ || (node.__transition__ = { + active: 0, + count: 0 + }), transition = lock[id]; + if (!transition) { + var time = inherit.time; + transition = lock[id] = { + tween: new d3_Map(), + time: time, + ease: inherit.ease, + delay: inherit.delay, + duration: inherit.duration + }; + ++lock.count; + d3.timer(function(elapsed) { + var d = node.__data__, ease = transition.ease, delay = transition.delay, duration = transition.duration, timer = d3_timer_active, tweened = []; + timer.t = delay + time; + if (delay <= elapsed) return start(elapsed - delay); + timer.c = start; + function start(elapsed) { + if (lock.active > id) return stop(); + lock.active = id; + transition.event && transition.event.start.call(node, d, i); + transition.tween.forEach(function(key, value) { + if (value = value.call(node, d, i)) { + tweened.push(value); + } + }); + d3.timer(function() { + timer.c = tick(elapsed || 1) ? d3_true : tick; + return 1; + }, 0, time); + } + function tick(elapsed) { + if (lock.active !== id) return stop(); + var t = elapsed / duration, e = ease(t), n = tweened.length; + while (n > 0) { + tweened[--n].call(node, e); + } + if (t >= 1) { + transition.event && transition.event.end.call(node, d, i); + return stop(); + } + } + function stop() { + if (--lock.count) delete lock[id]; else delete node.__transition__; + return 1; + } + }, 0, time); + } + } + d3.svg.axis = function() { + var scale = d3.scale.linear(), orient = d3_svg_axisDefaultOrient, innerTickSize = 6, outerTickSize = 6, tickPadding = 3, tickArguments_ = [ 10 ], tickValues = null, tickFormat_; + function axis(g) { + g.each(function() { + var g = d3.select(this); + var scale0 = this.__chart__ || scale, scale1 = this.__chart__ = scale.copy(); + var ticks = tickValues == null ? scale1.ticks ? scale1.ticks.apply(scale1, tickArguments_) : scale1.domain() : tickValues, tickFormat = tickFormat_ == null ? scale1.tickFormat ? scale1.tickFormat.apply(scale1, tickArguments_) : d3_identity : tickFormat_, tick = g.selectAll(".tick").data(ticks, scale1), tickEnter = tick.enter().insert("g", ".domain").attr("class", "tick").style("opacity", ε), tickExit = d3.transition(tick.exit()).style("opacity", ε).remove(), tickUpdate = d3.transition(tick.order()).style("opacity", 1), tickTransform; + var range = d3_scaleRange(scale1), path = g.selectAll(".domain").data([ 0 ]), pathUpdate = (path.enter().append("path").attr("class", "domain"), + d3.transition(path)); + tickEnter.append("line"); + tickEnter.append("text"); + var lineEnter = tickEnter.select("line"), lineUpdate = tickUpdate.select("line"), text = tick.select("text").text(tickFormat), textEnter = tickEnter.select("text"), textUpdate = tickUpdate.select("text"); + switch (orient) { + case "bottom": + { + tickTransform = d3_svg_axisX; + lineEnter.attr("y2", innerTickSize); + textEnter.attr("y", Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding); + lineUpdate.attr("x2", 0).attr("y2", innerTickSize); + textUpdate.attr("x", 0).attr("y", Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding); + text.attr("dy", ".71em").style("text-anchor", "middle"); + pathUpdate.attr("d", "M" + range[0] + "," + outerTickSize + "V0H" + range[1] + "V" + outerTickSize); + break; + } + + case "top": + { + tickTransform = d3_svg_axisX; + lineEnter.attr("y2", -innerTickSize); + textEnter.attr("y", -(Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding)); + lineUpdate.attr("x2", 0).attr("y2", -innerTickSize); + textUpdate.attr("x", 0).attr("y", -(Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding)); + text.attr("dy", "0em").style("text-anchor", "middle"); + pathUpdate.attr("d", "M" + range[0] + "," + -outerTickSize + "V0H" + range[1] + "V" + -outerTickSize); + break; + } + + case "left": + { + tickTransform = d3_svg_axisY; + lineEnter.attr("x2", -innerTickSize); + textEnter.attr("x", -(Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding)); + lineUpdate.attr("x2", -innerTickSize).attr("y2", 0); + textUpdate.attr("x", -(Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding)).attr("y", 0); + text.attr("dy", ".32em").style("text-anchor", "end"); + pathUpdate.attr("d", "M" + -outerTickSize + "," + range[0] + "H0V" + range[1] + "H" + -outerTickSize); + break; + } + + case "right": + { + tickTransform = d3_svg_axisY; + lineEnter.attr("x2", innerTickSize); + textEnter.attr("x", Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding); + lineUpdate.attr("x2", innerTickSize).attr("y2", 0); + textUpdate.attr("x", Math.max(innerTickSize, 0) + tickPadding).attr("y", 0); + text.attr("dy", ".32em").style("text-anchor", "start"); + pathUpdate.attr("d", "M" + outerTickSize + "," + range[0] + "H0V" + range[1] + "H" + outerTickSize); + break; + } + } + if (scale1.rangeBand) { + var x = scale1, dx = x.rangeBand() / 2; + scale0 = scale1 = function(d) { + return x(d) + dx; + }; + } else if (scale0.rangeBand) { + scale0 = scale1; + } else { + tickExit.call(tickTransform, scale1); + } + tickEnter.call(tickTransform, scale0); + tickUpdate.call(tickTransform, scale1); + }); + } + axis.scale = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return scale; + scale = x; + return axis; + }; + axis.orient = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return orient; + orient = x in d3_svg_axisOrients ? x + "" : d3_svg_axisDefaultOrient; + return axis; + }; + axis.ticks = function() { + if (!arguments.length) return tickArguments_; + tickArguments_ = arguments; + return axis; + }; + axis.tickValues = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return tickValues; + tickValues = x; + return axis; + }; + axis.tickFormat = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return tickFormat_; + tickFormat_ = x; + return axis; + }; + axis.tickSize = function(x) { + var n = arguments.length; + if (!n) return innerTickSize; + innerTickSize = +x; + outerTickSize = +arguments[n - 1]; + return axis; + }; + axis.innerTickSize = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return innerTickSize; + innerTickSize = +x; + return axis; + }; + axis.outerTickSize = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return outerTickSize; + outerTickSize = +x; + return axis; + }; + axis.tickPadding = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return tickPadding; + tickPadding = +x; + return axis; + }; + axis.tickSubdivide = function() { + return arguments.length && axis; + }; + return axis; + }; + var d3_svg_axisDefaultOrient = "bottom", d3_svg_axisOrients = { + top: 1, + right: 1, + bottom: 1, + left: 1 + }; + function d3_svg_axisX(selection, x) { + selection.attr("transform", function(d) { + return "translate(" + x(d) + ",0)"; + }); + } + function d3_svg_axisY(selection, y) { + selection.attr("transform", function(d) { + return "translate(0," + y(d) + ")"; + }); + } + d3.svg.brush = function() { + var event = d3_eventDispatch(brush, "brushstart", "brush", "brushend"), x = null, y = null, xExtent = [ 0, 0 ], yExtent = [ 0, 0 ], xExtentDomain, yExtentDomain, xClamp = true, yClamp = true, resizes = d3_svg_brushResizes[0]; + function brush(g) { + g.each(function() { + var g = d3.select(this).style("pointer-events", "all").style("-webkit-tap-highlight-color", "rgba(0,0,0,0)").on("mousedown.brush", brushstart).on("touchstart.brush", brushstart); + var background = g.selectAll(".background").data([ 0 ]); + background.enter().append("rect").attr("class", "background").style("visibility", "hidden").style("cursor", "crosshair"); + g.selectAll(".extent").data([ 0 ]).enter().append("rect").attr("class", "extent").style("cursor", "move"); + var resize = g.selectAll(".resize").data(resizes, d3_identity); + resize.exit().remove(); + resize.enter().append("g").attr("class", function(d) { + return "resize " + d; + }).style("cursor", function(d) { + return d3_svg_brushCursor[d]; + }).append("rect").attr("x", function(d) { + return /[ew]$/.test(d) ? -3 : null; + }).attr("y", function(d) { + return /^[ns]/.test(d) ? -3 : null; + }).attr("width", 6).attr("height", 6).style("visibility", "hidden"); + resize.style("display", brush.empty() ? "none" : null); + var gUpdate = d3.transition(g), backgroundUpdate = d3.transition(background), range; + if (x) { + range = d3_scaleRange(x); + backgroundUpdate.attr("x", range[0]).attr("width", range[1] - range[0]); + redrawX(gUpdate); + } + if (y) { + range = d3_scaleRange(y); + backgroundUpdate.attr("y", range[0]).attr("height", range[1] - range[0]); + redrawY(gUpdate); + } + redraw(gUpdate); + }); + } + brush.event = function(g) { + g.each(function() { + var event_ = event.of(this, arguments), extent1 = { + x: xExtent, + y: yExtent, + i: xExtentDomain, + j: yExtentDomain + }, extent0 = this.__chart__ || extent1; + this.__chart__ = extent1; + if (d3_transitionInheritId) { + d3.select(this).transition().each("start.brush", function() { + xExtentDomain = extent0.i; + yExtentDomain = extent0.j; + xExtent = extent0.x; + yExtent = extent0.y; + event_({ + type: "brushstart" + }); + }).tween("brush:brush", function() { + var xi = d3_interpolateArray(xExtent, extent1.x), yi = d3_interpolateArray(yExtent, extent1.y); + xExtentDomain = yExtentDomain = null; + return function(t) { + xExtent = extent1.x = xi(t); + yExtent = extent1.y = yi(t); + event_({ + type: "brush", + mode: "resize" + }); + }; + }).each("end.brush", function() { + xExtentDomain = extent1.i; + yExtentDomain = extent1.j; + event_({ + type: "brush", + mode: "resize" + }); + event_({ + type: "brushend" + }); + }); + } else { + event_({ + type: "brushstart" + }); + event_({ + type: "brush", + mode: "resize" + }); + event_({ + type: "brushend" + }); + } + }); + }; + function redraw(g) { + g.selectAll(".resize").attr("transform", function(d) { + return "translate(" + xExtent[+/e$/.test(d)] + "," + yExtent[+/^s/.test(d)] + ")"; + }); + } + function redrawX(g) { + g.select(".extent").attr("x", xExtent[0]); + g.selectAll(".extent,.n>rect,.s>rect").attr("width", xExtent[1] - xExtent[0]); + } + function redrawY(g) { + g.select(".extent").attr("y", yExtent[0]); + g.selectAll(".extent,.e>rect,.w>rect").attr("height", yExtent[1] - yExtent[0]); + } + function brushstart() { + var target = this, eventTarget = d3.select(d3.event.target), event_ = event.of(target, arguments), g = d3.select(target), resizing = eventTarget.datum(), resizingX = !/^(n|s)$/.test(resizing) && x, resizingY = !/^(e|w)$/.test(resizing) && y, dragging = eventTarget.classed("extent"), dragRestore = d3_event_dragSuppress(), center, origin = d3.mouse(target), offset; + var w = d3.select(d3_window).on("keydown.brush", keydown).on("keyup.brush", keyup); + if (d3.event.changedTouches) { + w.on("touchmove.brush", brushmove).on("touchend.brush", brushend); + } else { + w.on("mousemove.brush", brushmove).on("mouseup.brush", brushend); + } + g.interrupt().selectAll("*").interrupt(); + if (dragging) { + origin[0] = xExtent[0] - origin[0]; + origin[1] = yExtent[0] - origin[1]; + } else if (resizing) { + var ex = +/w$/.test(resizing), ey = +/^n/.test(resizing); + offset = [ xExtent[1 - ex] - origin[0], yExtent[1 - ey] - origin[1] ]; + origin[0] = xExtent[ex]; + origin[1] = yExtent[ey]; + } else if (d3.event.altKey) center = origin.slice(); + g.style("pointer-events", "none").selectAll(".resize").style("display", null); + d3.select("body").style("cursor", eventTarget.style("cursor")); + event_({ + type: "brushstart" + }); + brushmove(); + function keydown() { + if (d3.event.keyCode == 32) { + if (!dragging) { + center = null; + origin[0] -= xExtent[1]; + origin[1] -= yExtent[1]; + dragging = 2; + } + d3_eventPreventDefault(); + } + } + function keyup() { + if (d3.event.keyCode == 32 && dragging == 2) { + origin[0] += xExtent[1]; + origin[1] += yExtent[1]; + dragging = 0; + d3_eventPreventDefault(); + } + } + function brushmove() { + var point = d3.mouse(target), moved = false; + if (offset) { + point[0] += offset[0]; + point[1] += offset[1]; + } + if (!dragging) { + if (d3.event.altKey) { + if (!center) center = [ (xExtent[0] + xExtent[1]) / 2, (yExtent[0] + yExtent[1]) / 2 ]; + origin[0] = xExtent[+(point[0] < center[0])]; + origin[1] = yExtent[+(point[1] < center[1])]; + } else center = null; + } + if (resizingX && move1(point, x, 0)) { + redrawX(g); + moved = true; + } + if (resizingY && move1(point, y, 1)) { + redrawY(g); + moved = true; + } + if (moved) { + redraw(g); + event_({ + type: "brush", + mode: dragging ? "move" : "resize" + }); + } + } + function move1(point, scale, i) { + var range = d3_scaleRange(scale), r0 = range[0], r1 = range[1], position = origin[i], extent = i ? yExtent : xExtent, size = extent[1] - extent[0], min, max; + if (dragging) { + r0 -= position; + r1 -= size + position; + } + min = (i ? yClamp : xClamp) ? Math.max(r0, Math.min(r1, point[i])) : point[i]; + if (dragging) { + max = (min += position) + size; + } else { + if (center) position = Math.max(r0, Math.min(r1, 2 * center[i] - min)); + if (position < min) { + max = min; + min = position; + } else { + max = position; + } + } + if (extent[0] != min || extent[1] != max) { + if (i) yExtentDomain = null; else xExtentDomain = null; + extent[0] = min; + extent[1] = max; + return true; + } + } + function brushend() { + brushmove(); + g.style("pointer-events", "all").selectAll(".resize").style("display", brush.empty() ? "none" : null); + d3.select("body").style("cursor", null); + w.on("mousemove.brush", null).on("mouseup.brush", null).on("touchmove.brush", null).on("touchend.brush", null).on("keydown.brush", null).on("keyup.brush", null); + dragRestore(); + event_({ + type: "brushend" + }); + } + } + brush.x = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return x; + x = z; + resizes = d3_svg_brushResizes[!x << 1 | !y]; + return brush; + }; + brush.y = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return y; + y = z; + resizes = d3_svg_brushResizes[!x << 1 | !y]; + return brush; + }; + brush.clamp = function(z) { + if (!arguments.length) return x && y ? [ xClamp, yClamp ] : x ? xClamp : y ? yClamp : null; + if (x && y) xClamp = !!z[0], yClamp = !!z[1]; else if (x) xClamp = !!z; else if (y) yClamp = !!z; + return brush; + }; + brush.extent = function(z) { + var x0, x1, y0, y1, t; + if (!arguments.length) { + if (x) { + if (xExtentDomain) { + x0 = xExtentDomain[0], x1 = xExtentDomain[1]; + } else { + x0 = xExtent[0], x1 = xExtent[1]; + if (x.invert) x0 = x.invert(x0), x1 = x.invert(x1); + if (x1 < x0) t = x0, x0 = x1, x1 = t; + } + } + if (y) { + if (yExtentDomain) { + y0 = yExtentDomain[0], y1 = yExtentDomain[1]; + } else { + y0 = yExtent[0], y1 = yExtent[1]; + if (y.invert) y0 = y.invert(y0), y1 = y.invert(y1); + if (y1 < y0) t = y0, y0 = y1, y1 = t; + } + } + return x && y ? [ [ x0, y0 ], [ x1, y1 ] ] : x ? [ x0, x1 ] : y && [ y0, y1 ]; + } + if (x) { + x0 = z[0], x1 = z[1]; + if (y) x0 = x0[0], x1 = x1[0]; + xExtentDomain = [ x0, x1 ]; + if (x.invert) x0 = x(x0), x1 = x(x1); + if (x1 < x0) t = x0, x0 = x1, x1 = t; + if (x0 != xExtent[0] || x1 != xExtent[1]) xExtent = [ x0, x1 ]; + } + if (y) { + y0 = z[0], y1 = z[1]; + if (x) y0 = y0[1], y1 = y1[1]; + yExtentDomain = [ y0, y1 ]; + if (y.invert) y0 = y(y0), y1 = y(y1); + if (y1 < y0) t = y0, y0 = y1, y1 = t; + if (y0 != yExtent[0] || y1 != yExtent[1]) yExtent = [ y0, y1 ]; + } + return brush; + }; + brush.clear = function() { + if (!brush.empty()) { + xExtent = [ 0, 0 ], yExtent = [ 0, 0 ]; + xExtentDomain = yExtentDomain = null; + } + return brush; + }; + brush.empty = function() { + return !!x && xExtent[0] == xExtent[1] || !!y && yExtent[0] == yExtent[1]; + }; + return d3.rebind(brush, event, "on"); + }; + var d3_svg_brushCursor = { + n: "ns-resize", + e: "ew-resize", + s: "ns-resize", + w: "ew-resize", + nw: "nwse-resize", + ne: "nesw-resize", + se: "nwse-resize", + sw: "nesw-resize" + }; + var d3_svg_brushResizes = [ [ "n", "e", "s", "w", "nw", "ne", "se", "sw" ], [ "e", "w" ], [ "n", "s" ], [] ]; + var d3_time_format = d3_time.format = d3_locale_enUS.timeFormat; + var d3_time_formatUtc = d3_time_format.utc; + var d3_time_formatIso = d3_time_formatUtc("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%LZ"); + d3_time_format.iso = Date.prototype.toISOString && +new Date("2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z") ? d3_time_formatIsoNative : d3_time_formatIso; + function d3_time_formatIsoNative(date) { + return date.toISOString(); + } + d3_time_formatIsoNative.parse = function(string) { + var date = new Date(string); + return isNaN(date) ? null : date; + }; + d3_time_formatIsoNative.toString = d3_time_formatIso.toString; + d3_time.second = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + return new d3_date(Math.floor(date / 1e3) * 1e3); + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setTime(date.getTime() + Math.floor(offset) * 1e3); + }, function(date) { + return date.getSeconds(); + }); + d3_time.seconds = d3_time.second.range; + d3_time.seconds.utc = d3_time.second.utc.range; + d3_time.minute = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + return new d3_date(Math.floor(date / 6e4) * 6e4); + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setTime(date.getTime() + Math.floor(offset) * 6e4); + }, function(date) { + return date.getMinutes(); + }); + d3_time.minutes = d3_time.minute.range; + d3_time.minutes.utc = d3_time.minute.utc.range; + d3_time.hour = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + var timezone = date.getTimezoneOffset() / 60; + return new d3_date((Math.floor(date / 36e5 - timezone) + timezone) * 36e5); + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setTime(date.getTime() + Math.floor(offset) * 36e5); + }, function(date) { + return date.getHours(); + }); + d3_time.hours = d3_time.hour.range; + d3_time.hours.utc = d3_time.hour.utc.range; + d3_time.month = d3_time_interval(function(date) { + date = d3_time.day(date); + date.setDate(1); + return date; + }, function(date, offset) { + date.setMonth(date.getMonth() + offset); + }, function(date) { + return date.getMonth(); + }); + d3_time.months = d3_time.month.range; + d3_time.months.utc = d3_time.month.utc.range; + function d3_time_scale(linear, methods, format) { + function scale(x) { + return linear(x); + } + scale.invert = function(x) { + return d3_time_scaleDate(linear.invert(x)); + }; + scale.domain = function(x) { + if (!arguments.length) return linear.domain().map(d3_time_scaleDate); + linear.domain(x); + return scale; + }; + function tickMethod(extent, count) { + var span = extent[1] - extent[0], target = span / count, i = d3.bisect(d3_time_scaleSteps, target); + return i == d3_time_scaleSteps.length ? [ methods.year, d3_scale_linearTickRange(extent.map(function(d) { + return d / 31536e6; + }), count)[2] ] : !i ? [ d3_time_scaleMilliseconds, d3_scale_linearTickRange(extent, count)[2] ] : methods[target / d3_time_scaleSteps[i - 1] < d3_time_scaleSteps[i] / target ? i - 1 : i]; + } + scale.nice = function(interval, skip) { + var domain = scale.domain(), extent = d3_scaleExtent(domain), method = interval == null ? tickMethod(extent, 10) : typeof interval === "number" && tickMethod(extent, interval); + if (method) interval = method[0], skip = method[1]; + function skipped(date) { + return !isNaN(date) && !interval.range(date, d3_time_scaleDate(+date + 1), skip).length; + } + return scale.domain(d3_scale_nice(domain, skip > 1 ? { + floor: function(date) { + while (skipped(date = interval.floor(date))) date = d3_time_scaleDate(date - 1); + return date; + }, + ceil: function(date) { + while (skipped(date = interval.ceil(date))) date = d3_time_scaleDate(+date + 1); + return date; + } + } : interval)); + }; + scale.ticks = function(interval, skip) { + var extent = d3_scaleExtent(scale.domain()), method = interval == null ? tickMethod(extent, 10) : typeof interval === "number" ? tickMethod(extent, interval) : !interval.range && [ { + range: interval + }, skip ]; + if (method) interval = method[0], skip = method[1]; + return interval.range(extent[0], d3_time_scaleDate(+extent[1] + 1), skip < 1 ? 1 : skip); + }; + scale.tickFormat = function() { + return format; + }; + scale.copy = function() { + return d3_time_scale(linear.copy(), methods, format); + }; + return d3_scale_linearRebind(scale, linear); + } + function d3_time_scaleDate(t) { + return new Date(t); + } + var d3_time_scaleSteps = [ 1e3, 5e3, 15e3, 3e4, 6e4, 3e5, 9e5, 18e5, 36e5, 108e5, 216e5, 432e5, 864e5, 1728e5, 6048e5, 2592e6, 7776e6, 31536e6 ]; + var d3_time_scaleLocalMethods = [ [ d3_time.second, 1 ], [ d3_time.second, 5 ], [ d3_time.second, 15 ], [ d3_time.second, 30 ], [ d3_time.minute, 1 ], [ d3_time.minute, 5 ], [ d3_time.minute, 15 ], [ d3_time.minute, 30 ], [ d3_time.hour, 1 ], [ d3_time.hour, 3 ], [ d3_time.hour, 6 ], [ d3_time.hour, 12 ], [ d3_time.day, 1 ], [ d3_time.day, 2 ], [ d3_time.week, 1 ], [ d3_time.month, 1 ], [ d3_time.month, 3 ], [ d3_time.year, 1 ] ]; + var d3_time_scaleLocalFormat = d3_time_format.multi([ [ ".%L", function(d) { + return d.getMilliseconds(); + } ], [ ":%S", function(d) { + return d.getSeconds(); + } ], [ "%I:%M", function(d) { + return d.getMinutes(); + } ], [ "%I %p", function(d) { + return d.getHours(); + } ], [ "%a %d", function(d) { + return d.getDay() && d.getDate() != 1; + } ], [ "%b %d", function(d) { + return d.getDate() != 1; + } ], [ "%B", function(d) { + return d.getMonth(); + } ], [ "%Y", d3_true ] ]); + var d3_time_scaleMilliseconds = { + range: function(start, stop, step) { + return d3.range(Math.ceil(start / step) * step, +stop, step).map(d3_time_scaleDate); + }, + floor: d3_identity, + ceil: d3_identity + }; + d3_time_scaleLocalMethods.year = d3_time.year; + d3_time.scale = function() { + return d3_time_scale(d3.scale.linear(), d3_time_scaleLocalMethods, d3_time_scaleLocalFormat); + }; + var d3_time_scaleUtcMethods = d3_time_scaleLocalMethods.map(function(m) { + return [ m[0].utc, m[1] ]; + }); + var d3_time_scaleUtcFormat = d3_time_formatUtc.multi([ [ ".%L", function(d) { + return d.getUTCMilliseconds(); + } ], [ ":%S", function(d) { + return d.getUTCSeconds(); + } ], [ "%I:%M", function(d) { + return d.getUTCMinutes(); + } ], [ "%I %p", function(d) { + return d.getUTCHours(); + } ], [ "%a %d", function(d) { + return d.getUTCDay() && d.getUTCDate() != 1; + } ], [ "%b %d", function(d) { + return d.getUTCDate() != 1; + } ], [ "%B", function(d) { + return d.getUTCMonth(); + } ], [ "%Y", d3_true ] ]); + d3_time_scaleUtcMethods.year = d3_time.year.utc; + d3_time.scale.utc = function() { + return d3_time_scale(d3.scale.linear(), d3_time_scaleUtcMethods, d3_time_scaleUtcFormat); + }; + d3.text = d3_xhrType(function(request) { + return request.responseText; + }); + d3.json = function(url, callback) { + return d3_xhr(url, "application/json", d3_json, callback); + }; + function d3_json(request) { + return JSON.parse(request.responseText); + } + d3.html = function(url, callback) { + return d3_xhr(url, "text/html", d3_html, callback); + }; + function d3_html(request) { + var range = d3_document.createRange(); + range.selectNode(d3_document.body); + return range.createContextualFragment(request.responseText); + } + d3.xml = d3_xhrType(function(request) { + return request.responseXML; + }); + if (typeof define === "function" && define.amd) { + define(d3); + } else if (typeof module === "object" && module.exports) { + module.exports = d3; + } else { + this.d3 = d3; + } +}(); \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/js/d3.min.js b/js/d3.min.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac74e5a --- /dev/null +++ b/js/d3.min.js @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +!function(){function n(n,t){return t>n?-1:n>t?1:n>=t?0:0/0}function t(n){return null!=n&&!isNaN(n)}function r(n){return{left:function(t,r,e,u){for(arguments.length<3&&(e=0),arguments.length<4&&(u=t.length);u>e;){var i=e+u>>>1;n(t[i],r)<0?e=i+1:u=i}return e},right:function(t,r,e,u){for(arguments.length<3&&(e=0),arguments.length<4&&(u=t.length);u>e;){var i=e+u>>>1;n(t[i],r)>0?u=i:e=i+1}return e}}}function e(n){return n.length}function u(n){for(var t=1;n*t%1;)t*=10;return t}function i(n,t){try{for(var r in t)Object.defineProperty(n.prototype,r,{value:t[r],enumerable:!1})}catch(e){n.prototype=t}}function o(){}function a(n){return sa+n in this}function c(n){return n=sa+n,n in this&&delete this[n]}function s(){var n=[];return this.forEach(function(t){n.push(t)}),n}function l(){var n=0;for(var t in this)t.charCodeAt(0)===la&&++n;return n}function f(){for(var n in this)if(n.charCodeAt(0)===la)return!1;return!0}function h(){}function g(n,t,r){return function(){var e=r.apply(t,arguments);return e===t?n:e}}function p(n,t){if(t in n)return t;t=t.charAt(0).toUpperCase()+t.substring(1);for(var r=0,e=fa.length;e>r;++r){var u=fa[r]+t;if(u in n)return u}}function v(){}function d(){}function m(n){function t(){for(var t,e=r,u=-1,i=e.length;++ur;r++)for(var u,i=n[r],o=0,a=i.length;a>o;o++)(u=i[o])&&t(u,o,r);return n}function U(n){return ga(n,Ma),n}function j(n){var t,r;return function(e,u,i){var o,a=n[i].update,c=a.length;for(i!=r&&(r=i,t=0),u>=t&&(t=u+1);!(o=a[t])&&++t0&&(n=n.substring(0,a));var s=ba.get(n);return s&&(n=s,c=I),a?t?u:e:t?v:i}function O(n,t){return function(r){var e=Bo.event;Bo.event=r,t[0]=this.__data__;try{n.apply(this,t)}finally{Bo.event=e}}}function I(n,t){var r=O(n,t);return function(n){var t=this,e=n.relatedTarget;e&&(e===t||8&e.compareDocumentPosition(t))||r.call(t,n)}}function Y(){var n=".dragsuppress-"+ ++Sa,t="click"+n,r=Bo.select(Qo).on("touchmove"+n,y).on("dragstart"+n,y).on("selectstart"+n,y);if(wa){var e=Ko.style,u=e[wa];e[wa]="none"}return function(i){function o(){r.on(t,null)}r.on(n,null),wa&&(e[wa]=u),i&&(r.on(t,function(){y(),o()},!0),setTimeout(o,0))}}function Z(n,t){t.changedTouches&&(t=t.changedTouches[0]);var r=n.ownerSVGElement||n;if(r.createSVGPoint){var e=r.createSVGPoint();return e.x=t.clientX,e.y=t.clientY,e=e.matrixTransform(n.getScreenCTM().inverse()),[e.x,e.y]}var u=n.getBoundingClientRect();return[t.clientX-u.left-n.clientLeft,t.clientY-u.top-n.clientTop]}function V(){return Bo.event.changedTouches[0].identifier}function $(){return Bo.event.target}function X(){return Qo}function B(n){return n>0?1:0>n?-1:0}function J(n,t,r){return(t[0]-n[0])*(r[1]-n[1])-(t[1]-n[1])*(r[0]-n[0])}function W(n){return n>1?0:-1>n?ka:Math.acos(n)}function G(n){return n>1?Aa:-1>n?-Aa:Math.asin(n)}function K(n){return((n=Math.exp(n))-1/n)/2}function Q(n){return((n=Math.exp(n))+1/n)/2}function nt(n){return((n=Math.exp(2*n))-1)/(n+1)}function tt(n){return(n=Math.sin(n/2))*n}function rt(){}function et(n,t,r){return new ut(n,t,r)}function ut(n,t,r){this.h=n,this.s=t,this.l=r}function it(n,t,r){function e(n){return n>360?n-=360:0>n&&(n+=360),60>n?i+(o-i)*n/60:180>n?o:240>n?i+(o-i)*(240-n)/60:i}function u(n){return Math.round(255*e(n))}var i,o;return n=isNaN(n)?0:(n%=360)<0?n+360:n,t=isNaN(t)?0:0>t?0:t>1?1:t,r=0>r?0:r>1?1:r,o=.5>=r?r*(1+t):r+t-r*t,i=2*r-o,yt(u(n+120),u(n),u(n-120))}function ot(n,t,r){return new at(n,t,r)}function at(n,t,r){this.h=n,this.c=t,this.l=r}function ct(n,t,r){return isNaN(n)&&(n=0),isNaN(t)&&(t=0),st(r,Math.cos(n*=za)*t,Math.sin(n)*t)}function st(n,t,r){return new lt(n,t,r)}function lt(n,t,r){this.l=n,this.a=t,this.b=r}function ft(n,t,r){var e=(n+16)/116,u=e+t/500,i=e-r/200;return u=gt(u)*Oa,e=gt(e)*Ia,i=gt(i)*Ya,yt(vt(3.2404542*u-1.5371385*e-.4985314*i),vt(-.969266*u+1.8760108*e+.041556*i),vt(.0556434*u-.2040259*e+1.0572252*i))}function ht(n,t,r){return n>0?ot(Math.atan2(r,t)*La,Math.sqrt(t*t+r*r),n):ot(0/0,0/0,n)}function gt(n){return n>.206893034?n*n*n:(n-4/29)/7.787037}function pt(n){return n>.008856?Math.pow(n,1/3):7.787037*n+4/29}function vt(n){return Math.round(255*(.00304>=n?12.92*n:1.055*Math.pow(n,1/2.4)-.055))}function dt(n){return yt(n>>16,255&n>>8,255&n)}function mt(n){return dt(n)+""}function yt(n,t,r){return new xt(n,t,r)}function xt(n,t,r){this.r=n,this.g=t,this.b=r}function Mt(n){return 16>n?"0"+Math.max(0,n).toString(16):Math.min(255,n).toString(16)}function _t(n,t,r){var e,u,i,o=0,a=0,c=0;if(e=/([a-z]+)\((.*)\)/i.exec(n))switch(u=e[2].split(","),e[1]){case"hsl":return r(parseFloat(u[0]),parseFloat(u[1])/100,parseFloat(u[2])/100);case"rgb":return t(kt(u[0]),kt(u[1]),kt(u[2]))}return(i=$a.get(n))?t(i.r,i.g,i.b):(null==n||"#"!==n.charAt(0)||isNaN(i=parseInt(n.substring(1),16))||(4===n.length?(o=(3840&i)>>4,o=o>>4|o,a=240&i,a=a>>4|a,c=15&i,c=c<<4|c):7===n.length&&(o=(16711680&i)>>16,a=(65280&i)>>8,c=255&i)),t(o,a,c))}function bt(n,t,r){var e,u,i=Math.min(n/=255,t/=255,r/=255),o=Math.max(n,t,r),a=o-i,c=(o+i)/2;return a?(u=.5>c?a/(o+i):a/(2-o-i),e=n==o?(t-r)/a+(r>t?6:0):t==o?(r-n)/a+2:(n-t)/a+4,e*=60):(e=0/0,u=c>0&&1>c?0:e),et(e,u,c)}function wt(n,t,r){n=St(n),t=St(t),r=St(r);var e=pt((.4124564*n+.3575761*t+.1804375*r)/Oa),u=pt((.2126729*n+.7151522*t+.072175*r)/Ia),i=pt((.0193339*n+.119192*t+.9503041*r)/Ya);return st(116*u-16,500*(e-u),200*(u-i))}function St(n){return(n/=255)<=.04045?n/12.92:Math.pow((n+.055)/1.055,2.4)}function kt(n){var t=parseFloat(n);return"%"===n.charAt(n.length-1)?Math.round(2.55*t):t}function Et(n){return"function"==typeof n?n:function(){return n}}function At(n){return n}function Ct(n){return function(t,r,e){return 2===arguments.length&&"function"==typeof r&&(e=r,r=null),Nt(t,r,n,e)}}function Nt(n,t,r,e){function u(){var n,t=c.status;if(!t&&c.responseText||t>=200&&300>t||304===t){try{n=r.call(i,c)}catch(e){return o.error.call(i,e),void 0}o.load.call(i,n)}else o.error.call(i,c)}var i={},o=Bo.dispatch("beforesend","progress","load","error"),a={},c=new XMLHttpRequest,s=null;return!Qo.XDomainRequest||"withCredentials"in c||!/^(http(s)?:)?\/\//.test(n)||(c=new XDomainRequest),"onload"in c?c.onload=c.onerror=u:c.onreadystatechange=function(){c.readyState>3&&u()},c.onprogress=function(n){var t=Bo.event;Bo.event=n;try{o.progress.call(i,c)}finally{Bo.event=t}},i.header=function(n,t){return n=(n+"").toLowerCase(),arguments.length<2?a[n]:(null==t?delete a[n]:a[n]=t+"",i)},i.mimeType=function(n){return arguments.length?(t=null==n?null:n+"",i):t},i.responseType=function(n){return arguments.length?(s=n,i):s},i.response=function(n){return r=n,i},["get","post"].forEach(function(n){i[n]=function(){return i.send.apply(i,[n].concat(Wo(arguments)))}}),i.send=function(r,e,u){if(2===arguments.length&&"function"==typeof e&&(u=e,e=null),c.open(r,n,!0),null==t||"accept"in a||(a.accept=t+",*/*"),c.setRequestHeader)for(var l in a)c.setRequestHeader(l,a[l]);return null!=t&&c.overrideMimeType&&c.overrideMimeType(t),null!=s&&(c.responseType=s),null!=u&&i.on("error",u).on("load",function(n){u(null,n)}),o.beforesend.call(i,c),c.send(null==e?null:e),i},i.abort=function(){return c.abort(),i},Bo.rebind(i,o,"on"),null==e?i:i.get(zt(e))}function zt(n){return 1===n.length?function(t,r){n(null==t?r:null)}:n}function Lt(){var n=Tt(),t=qt()-n;t>24?(isFinite(t)&&(clearTimeout(Wa),Wa=setTimeout(Lt,t)),Ja=0):(Ja=1,Ka(Lt))}function Tt(){var n=Date.now();for(Ga=Xa;Ga;)n>=Ga.t&&(Ga.f=Ga.c(n-Ga.t)),Ga=Ga.n;return n}function qt(){for(var n,t=Xa,r=1/0;t;)t.f?t=n?n.n=t.n:Xa=t.n:(t.t8?function(n){return n/r}:function(n){return n*r},symbol:n}}function Pt(n){var t=n.decimal,r=n.thousands,e=n.grouping,u=n.currency,i=e?function(n){for(var t=n.length,u=[],i=0,o=e[0];t>0&&o>0;)u.push(n.substring(t-=o,t+o)),o=e[i=(i+1)%e.length];return u.reverse().join(r)}:At;return function(n){var r=nc.exec(n),e=r[1]||" ",o=r[2]||">",a=r[3]||"",c=r[4]||"",s=r[5],l=+r[6],f=r[7],h=r[8],g=r[9],p=1,v="",d="",m=!1;switch(h&&(h=+h.substring(1)),(s||"0"===e&&"="===o)&&(s=e="0",o="=",f&&(l-=Math.floor((l-1)/4))),g){case"n":f=!0,g="g";break;case"%":p=100,d="%",g="f";break;case"p":p=100,d="%",g="r";break;case"b":case"o":case"x":case"X":"#"===c&&(v="0"+g.toLowerCase());case"c":case"d":m=!0,h=0;break;case"s":p=-1,g="r"}"$"===c&&(v=u[0],d=u[1]),"r"!=g||h||(g="g"),null!=h&&("g"==g?h=Math.max(1,Math.min(21,h)):("e"==g||"f"==g)&&(h=Math.max(0,Math.min(20,h)))),g=tc.get(g)||Ut;var y=s&&f;return function(n){var r=d;if(m&&n%1)return"";var u=0>n||0===n&&0>1/n?(n=-n,"-"):a;if(0>p){var c=Bo.formatPrefix(n,h);n=c.scale(n),r=c.symbol+d}else n*=p;n=g(n,h);var x=n.lastIndexOf("."),M=0>x?n:n.substring(0,x),_=0>x?"":t+n.substring(x+1);!s&&f&&(M=i(M));var b=v.length+M.length+_.length+(y?0:u.length),w=l>b?new Array(b=l-b+1).join(e):"";return y&&(M=i(w+M)),u+=v,n=M+_,("<"===o?u+n+w:">"===o?w+u+n:"^"===o?w.substring(0,b>>=1)+u+n+w.substring(b):u+(y?n:w+n))+r}}}function Ut(n){return n+""}function jt(){this._=new Date(arguments.length>1?Date.UTC.apply(this,arguments):arguments[0])}function Ht(n,t,r){function e(t){var r=n(t),e=i(r,1);return e-t>t-r?r:e}function u(r){return t(r=n(new ec(r-1)),1),r}function i(n,r){return t(n=new ec(+n),r),n}function o(n,e,i){var o=u(n),a=[];if(i>1)for(;e>o;)r(o)%i||a.push(new Date(+o)),t(o,1);else for(;e>o;)a.push(new Date(+o)),t(o,1);return a}function a(n,t,r){try{ec=jt;var e=new jt;return e._=n,o(e,t,r)}finally{ec=Date}}n.floor=n,n.round=e,n.ceil=u,n.offset=i,n.range=o;var c=n.utc=Ft(n);return c.floor=c,c.round=Ft(e),c.ceil=Ft(u),c.offset=Ft(i),c.range=a,n}function Ft(n){return function(t,r){try{ec=jt;var e=new jt;return e._=t,n(e,r)._}finally{ec=Date}}}function Ot(n){function t(n){function t(t){for(var r,u,i,o=[],a=-1,c=0;++aa;){if(e>=s)return-1;if(u=t.charCodeAt(a++),37===u){if(o=t.charAt(a++),i=N[o in ic?t.charAt(a++):o],!i||(e=i(n,r,e))<0)return-1}else if(u!=r.charCodeAt(e++))return-1}return e}function e(n,t,r){b.lastIndex=0;var e=b.exec(t.substring(r));return e?(n.w=w.get(e[0].toLowerCase()),r+e[0].length):-1}function u(n,t,r){M.lastIndex=0;var e=M.exec(t.substring(r));return e?(n.w=_.get(e[0].toLowerCase()),r+e[0].length):-1}function i(n,t,r){E.lastIndex=0;var e=E.exec(t.substring(r));return e?(n.m=A.get(e[0].toLowerCase()),r+e[0].length):-1}function o(n,t,r){S.lastIndex=0;var e=S.exec(t.substring(r));return e?(n.m=k.get(e[0].toLowerCase()),r+e[0].length):-1}function a(n,t,e){return r(n,C.c.toString(),t,e)}function c(n,t,e){return r(n,C.x.toString(),t,e)}function s(n,t,e){return r(n,C.X.toString(),t,e)}function l(n,t,r){var e=x.get(t.substring(r,r+=2).toLowerCase());return null==e?-1:(n.p=e,r)}var f=n.dateTime,h=n.date,g=n.time,p=n.periods,v=n.days,d=n.shortDays,m=n.months,y=n.shortMonths;t.utc=function(n){function r(n){try{ec=jt;var t=new ec;return t._=n,e(t)}finally{ec=Date}}var e=t(n);return r.parse=function(n){try{ec=jt;var t=e.parse(n);return t&&t._}finally{ec=Date}},r.toString=e.toString,r},t.multi=t.utc.multi=ar;var x=Bo.map(),M=Yt(v),_=Zt(v),b=Yt(d),w=Zt(d),S=Yt(m),k=Zt(m),E=Yt(y),A=Zt(y);p.forEach(function(n,t){x.set(n.toLowerCase(),t)});var C={a:function(n){return d[n.getDay()]},A:function(n){return v[n.getDay()]},b:function(n){return y[n.getMonth()]},B:function(n){return m[n.getMonth()]},c:t(f),d:function(n,t){return It(n.getDate(),t,2)},e:function(n,t){return It(n.getDate(),t,2)},H:function(n,t){return It(n.getHours(),t,2)},I:function(n,t){return It(n.getHours()%12||12,t,2)},j:function(n,t){return It(1+rc.dayOfYear(n),t,3)},L:function(n,t){return It(n.getMilliseconds(),t,3)},m:function(n,t){return It(n.getMonth()+1,t,2)},M:function(n,t){return It(n.getMinutes(),t,2)},p:function(n){return p[+(n.getHours()>=12)]},S:function(n,t){return It(n.getSeconds(),t,2)},U:function(n,t){return It(rc.sundayOfYear(n),t,2)},w:function(n){return n.getDay()},W:function(n,t){return It(rc.mondayOfYear(n),t,2)},x:t(h),X:t(g),y:function(n,t){return It(n.getFullYear()%100,t,2)},Y:function(n,t){return It(n.getFullYear()%1e4,t,4)},Z:ir,"%":function(){return"%"}},N={a:e,A:u,b:i,B:o,c:a,d:Qt,e:Qt,H:tr,I:tr,j:nr,L:ur,m:Kt,M:rr,p:l,S:er,U:$t,w:Vt,W:Xt,x:c,X:s,y:Jt,Y:Bt,Z:Wt,"%":or};return t}function It(n,t,r){var e=0>n?"-":"",u=(e?-n:n)+"",i=u.length;return e+(r>i?new Array(r-i+1).join(t)+u:u)}function Yt(n){return new RegExp("^(?:"+n.map(Bo.requote).join("|")+")","i")}function Zt(n){for(var t=new o,r=-1,e=n.length;++r68?1900:2e3)}function Kt(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+2));return e?(n.m=e[0]-1,r+e[0].length):-1}function Qt(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+2));return e?(n.d=+e[0],r+e[0].length):-1}function nr(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+3));return e?(n.j=+e[0],r+e[0].length):-1}function tr(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+2));return e?(n.H=+e[0],r+e[0].length):-1}function rr(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+2));return e?(n.M=+e[0],r+e[0].length):-1}function er(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+2));return e?(n.S=+e[0],r+e[0].length):-1}function ur(n,t,r){oc.lastIndex=0;var e=oc.exec(t.substring(r,r+3));return e?(n.L=+e[0],r+e[0].length):-1}function ir(n){var t=n.getTimezoneOffset(),r=t>0?"-":"+",e=~~(ca(t)/60),u=ca(t)%60;return r+It(e,"0",2)+It(u,"0",2)}function or(n,t,r){ac.lastIndex=0;var e=ac.exec(t.substring(r,r+1));return e?r+e[0].length:-1}function ar(n){for(var t=n.length,r=-1;++r=0?1:-1,a=o*r,c=Math.cos(t),s=Math.sin(t),l=i*s,f=u*c+l*Math.cos(a),h=l*o*Math.sin(a);gc.add(Math.atan2(h,f)),e=n,u=c,i=s}var t,r,e,u,i;pc.point=function(o,a){pc.point=n,e=(t=o)*za,u=Math.cos(a=(r=a)*za/2+ka/4),i=Math.sin(a)},pc.lineEnd=function(){n(t,r)}}function pr(n){var t=n[0],r=n[1],e=Math.cos(r);return[e*Math.cos(t),e*Math.sin(t),Math.sin(r)]}function vr(n,t){return n[0]*t[0]+n[1]*t[1]+n[2]*t[2]}function dr(n,t){return[n[1]*t[2]-n[2]*t[1],n[2]*t[0]-n[0]*t[2],n[0]*t[1]-n[1]*t[0]]}function mr(n,t){n[0]+=t[0],n[1]+=t[1],n[2]+=t[2]}function yr(n,t){return[n[0]*t,n[1]*t,n[2]*t]}function xr(n){var t=Math.sqrt(n[0]*n[0]+n[1]*n[1]+n[2]*n[2]);n[0]/=t,n[1]/=t,n[2]/=t}function Mr(n){return[Math.atan2(n[1],n[0]),G(n[2])]}function _r(n,t){return ca(n[0]-t[0])a;++a)u.point((r=n[a])[0],r[1]);return u.lineEnd(),void 0}var c=new zr(r,n,null,!0),s=new zr(r,null,c,!1);c.o=s,i.push(c),o.push(s),c=new zr(e,n,null,!1),s=new zr(e,null,c,!0),c.o=s,i.push(c),o.push(s)}}),o.sort(t),Nr(i),Nr(o),i.length){for(var a=0,c=r,s=o.length;s>a;++a)o[a].e=c=!c;for(var l,f,h=i[0];;){for(var g=h,p=!0;g.v;)if((g=g.n)===h)return;l=g.z,u.lineStart();do{if(g.v=g.o.v=!0,g.e){if(p)for(var a=0,s=l.length;s>a;++a)u.point((f=l[a])[0],f[1]);else e(g.x,g.n.x,1,u);g=g.n}else{if(p){l=g.p.z;for(var a=l.length-1;a>=0;--a)u.point((f=l[a])[0],f[1])}else e(g.x,g.p.x,-1,u);g=g.p}g=g.o,l=g.z,p=!p}while(!g.v);u.lineEnd()}}}function Nr(n){if(t=n.length){for(var t,r,e=0,u=n[0];++e0){for(_||(i.polygonStart(),_=!0),i.lineStart();++o1&&2&t&&r.push(r.pop().concat(r.shift())),g.push(r.filter(Tr))}var g,p,v,d=t(i),m=u.invert(e[0],e[1]),y={point:o,lineStart:c,lineEnd:s,polygonStart:function(){y.point=l,y.lineStart=f,y.lineEnd=h,g=[],p=[]},polygonEnd:function(){y.point=o,y.lineStart=c,y.lineEnd=s,g=Bo.merge(g);var n=Dr(m,p);g.length?(_||(i.polygonStart(),_=!0),Cr(g,Rr,n,r,i)):n&&(_||(i.polygonStart(),_=!0),i.lineStart(),r(null,null,1,i),i.lineEnd()),_&&(i.polygonEnd(),_=!1),g=p=null},sphere:function(){i.polygonStart(),i.lineStart(),r(null,null,1,i),i.lineEnd(),i.polygonEnd()}},x=qr(),M=t(x),_=!1;return y}}function Tr(n){return n.length>1}function qr(){var n,t=[];return{lineStart:function(){t.push(n=[])},point:function(t,r){n.push([t,r])},lineEnd:v,buffer:function(){var r=t;return t=[],n=null,r},rejoin:function(){t.length>1&&t.push(t.pop().concat(t.shift()))}}}function Rr(n,t){return((n=n.x)[0]<0?n[1]-Aa-Ca:Aa-n[1])-((t=t.x)[0]<0?t[1]-Aa-Ca:Aa-t[1])}function Dr(n,t){var r=n[0],e=n[1],u=[Math.sin(r),-Math.cos(r),0],i=0,o=0;gc.reset();for(var a=0,c=t.length;c>a;++a){var s=t[a],l=s.length;if(l)for(var f=s[0],h=f[0],g=f[1]/2+ka/4,p=Math.sin(g),v=Math.cos(g),d=1;;){d===l&&(d=0),n=s[d];var m=n[0],y=n[1]/2+ka/4,x=Math.sin(y),M=Math.cos(y),_=m-h,b=_>=0?1:-1,w=b*_,S=w>ka,k=p*x;if(gc.add(Math.atan2(k*b*Math.sin(w),v*M+k*Math.cos(w))),i+=S?_+b*Ea:_,S^h>=r^m>=r){var E=dr(pr(f),pr(n));xr(E);var A=dr(u,E);xr(A);var C=(S^_>=0?-1:1)*G(A[2]);(e>C||e===C&&(E[0]||E[1]))&&(o+=S^_>=0?1:-1)}if(!d++)break;h=m,p=x,v=M,f=n}}return(-Ca>i||Ca>i&&0>gc)^1&o}function Pr(n){var t,r=0/0,e=0/0,u=0/0;return{lineStart:function(){n.lineStart(),t=1},point:function(i,o){var a=i>0?ka:-ka,c=ca(i-r);ca(c-ka)0?Aa:-Aa),n.point(u,e),n.lineEnd(),n.lineStart(),n.point(a,e),n.point(i,e),t=0):u!==a&&c>=ka&&(ca(r-u)Ca?Math.atan((Math.sin(t)*(i=Math.cos(e))*Math.sin(r)-Math.sin(e)*(u=Math.cos(t))*Math.sin(n))/(u*i*o)):(t+e)/2}function jr(n,t,r,e){var u;if(null==n)u=r*Aa,e.point(-ka,u),e.point(0,u),e.point(ka,u),e.point(ka,0),e.point(ka,-u),e.point(0,-u),e.point(-ka,-u),e.point(-ka,0),e.point(-ka,u);else if(ca(n[0]-t[0])>Ca){var i=n[0]i}function r(n){var r,i,c,s,l;return{lineStart:function(){s=c=!1,l=1},point:function(f,h){var g,p=[f,h],v=t(f,h),d=o?v?0:u(f,h):v?u(f+(0>f?ka:-ka),h):0;if(!r&&(s=c=v)&&n.lineStart(),v!==c&&(g=e(r,p),(_r(r,g)||_r(p,g))&&(p[0]+=Ca,p[1]+=Ca,v=t(p[0],p[1]))),v!==c)l=0,v?(n.lineStart(),g=e(p,r),n.point(g[0],g[1])):(g=e(r,p),n.point(g[0],g[1]),n.lineEnd()),r=g;else if(a&&r&&o^v){var m;d&i||!(m=e(p,r,!0))||(l=0,o?(n.lineStart(),n.point(m[0][0],m[0][1]),n.point(m[1][0],m[1][1]),n.lineEnd()):(n.point(m[1][0],m[1][1]),n.lineEnd(),n.lineStart(),n.point(m[0][0],m[0][1])))}!v||r&&_r(r,p)||n.point(p[0],p[1]),r=p,c=v,i=d},lineEnd:function(){c&&n.lineEnd(),r=null},clean:function(){return l|(s&&c)<<1}}}function e(n,t,r){var e=pr(n),u=pr(t),o=[1,0,0],a=dr(e,u),c=vr(a,a),s=a[0],l=c-s*s;if(!l)return!r&&n;var f=i*c/l,h=-i*s/l,g=dr(o,a),p=yr(o,f),v=yr(a,h);mr(p,v);var d=g,m=vr(p,d),y=vr(d,d),x=m*m-y*(vr(p,p)-1);if(!(0>x)){var M=Math.sqrt(x),_=yr(d,(-m-M)/y);if(mr(_,p),_=Mr(_),!r)return _;var b,w=n[0],S=t[0],k=n[1],E=t[1];w>S&&(b=w,w=S,S=b);var A=S-w,C=ca(A-ka)A;if(!C&&k>E&&(b=k,k=E,E=b),N?C?k+E>0^_[1]<(ca(_[0]-w)ka^(w<=_[0]&&_[0]<=S)){var z=yr(d,(-m+M)/y);return mr(z,p),[_,Mr(z)]}}}function u(t,r){var e=o?n:ka-n,u=0;return-e>t?u|=1:t>e&&(u|=2),-e>r?u|=4:r>e&&(u|=8),u}var i=Math.cos(n),o=i>0,a=ca(i)>Ca,c=ge(n,6*za);return Lr(t,r,c,o?[0,-n]:[-ka,n-ka])}function Fr(n,t,r,e){return function(u){var i,o=u.a,a=u.b,c=o.x,s=o.y,l=a.x,f=a.y,h=0,g=1,p=l-c,v=f-s;if(i=n-c,p||!(i>0)){if(i/=p,0>p){if(h>i)return;g>i&&(g=i)}else if(p>0){if(i>g)return;i>h&&(h=i)}if(i=r-c,p||!(0>i)){if(i/=p,0>p){if(i>g)return;i>h&&(h=i)}else if(p>0){if(h>i)return;g>i&&(g=i)}if(i=t-s,v||!(i>0)){if(i/=v,0>v){if(h>i)return;g>i&&(g=i)}else if(v>0){if(i>g)return;i>h&&(h=i)}if(i=e-s,v||!(0>i)){if(i/=v,0>v){if(i>g)return;i>h&&(h=i)}else if(v>0){if(h>i)return;g>i&&(g=i)}return h>0&&(u.a={x:c+h*p,y:s+h*v}),1>g&&(u.b={x:c+g*p,y:s+g*v}),u}}}}}}function Or(n,t,r,e){function u(e,u){return ca(e[0]-n)0?0:3:ca(e[0]-r)0?2:1:ca(e[1]-t)0?1:0:u>0?3:2}function i(n,t){return o(n.x,t.x)}function o(n,t){var r=u(n,1),e=u(t,1);return r!==e?r-e:0===r?t[1]-n[1]:1===r?n[0]-t[0]:2===r?n[1]-t[1]:t[0]-n[0]}return function(a){function c(n){for(var t=0,r=d.length,e=n[1],u=0;r>u;++u)for(var i,o=1,a=d[u],c=a.length,s=a[0];c>o;++o)i=a[o],s[1]<=e?i[1]>e&&J(s,i,n)>0&&++t:i[1]<=e&&J(s,i,n)<0&&--t,s=i;return 0!==t}function s(i,a,c,s){var l=0,f=0;if(null==i||(l=u(i,c))!==(f=u(a,c))||o(i,a)<0^c>0){do s.point(0===l||3===l?n:r,l>1?e:t);while((l=(l+c+4)%4)!==f)}else s.point(a[0],a[1])}function l(u,i){return u>=n&&r>=u&&i>=t&&e>=i}function f(n,t){l(n,t)&&a.point(n,t)}function h(){N.point=p,d&&d.push(m=[]),S=!0,w=!1,_=b=0/0}function g(){v&&(p(y,x),M&&w&&A.rejoin(),v.push(A.buffer())),N.point=f,w&&a.lineEnd()}function p(n,t){n=Math.max(-Cc,Math.min(Cc,n)),t=Math.max(-Cc,Math.min(Cc,t));var r=l(n,t);if(d&&m.push([n,t]),S)y=n,x=t,M=r,S=!1,r&&(a.lineStart(),a.point(n,t));else if(r&&w)a.point(n,t);else{var e={a:{x:_,y:b},b:{x:n,y:t}};C(e)?(w||(a.lineStart(),a.point(e.a.x,e.a.y)),a.point(e.b.x,e.b.y),r||a.lineEnd(),k=!1):r&&(a.lineStart(),a.point(n,t),k=!1)}_=n,b=t,w=r}var v,d,m,y,x,M,_,b,w,S,k,E=a,A=qr(),C=Fr(n,t,r,e),N={point:f,lineStart:h,lineEnd:g,polygonStart:function(){a=A,v=[],d=[],k=!0},polygonEnd:function(){a=E,v=Bo.merge(v);var t=c([n,e]),r=k&&t,u=v.length;(r||u)&&(a.polygonStart(),r&&(a.lineStart(),s(null,null,1,a),a.lineEnd()),u&&Cr(v,i,t,s,a),a.polygonEnd()),v=d=m=null}};return N}}function Ir(n,t){function r(r,e){return r=n(r,e),t(r[0],r[1])}return n.invert&&t.invert&&(r.invert=function(r,e){return r=t.invert(r,e),r&&n.invert(r[0],r[1])}),r}function Yr(n){var t=0,r=ka/3,e=ie(n),u=e(t,r);return u.parallels=function(n){return arguments.length?e(t=n[0]*ka/180,r=n[1]*ka/180):[180*(t/ka),180*(r/ka)]},u}function Zr(n,t){function r(n,t){var r=Math.sqrt(i-2*u*Math.sin(t))/u;return[r*Math.sin(n*=u),o-r*Math.cos(n)]}var e=Math.sin(n),u=(e+Math.sin(t))/2,i=1+e*(2*u-e),o=Math.sqrt(i)/u;return r.invert=function(n,t){var r=o-t;return[Math.atan2(n,r)/u,G((i-(n*n+r*r)*u*u)/(2*u))]},r}function Vr(){function n(n,t){zc+=u*n-e*t,e=n,u=t}var t,r,e,u;Dc.point=function(i,o){Dc.point=n,t=e=i,r=u=o},Dc.lineEnd=function(){n(t,r)}}function $r(n,t){Lc>n&&(Lc=n),n>qc&&(qc=n),Tc>t&&(Tc=t),t>Rc&&(Rc=t)}function Xr(){function n(n,t){o.push("M",n,",",t,i)}function t(n,t){o.push("M",n,",",t),a.point=r}function r(n,t){o.push("L",n,",",t)}function e(){a.point=n}function u(){o.push("Z")}var i=Br(4.5),o=[],a={point:n,lineStart:function(){a.point=t},lineEnd:e,polygonStart:function(){a.lineEnd=u},polygonEnd:function(){a.lineEnd=e,a.point=n},pointRadius:function(n){return i=Br(n),a},result:function(){if(o.length){var n=o.join("");return o=[],n}}};return a}function Br(n){return"m0,"+n+"a"+n+","+n+" 0 1,1 0,"+-2*n+"a"+n+","+n+" 0 1,1 0,"+2*n+"z"}function Jr(n,t){mc+=n,yc+=t,++xc}function Wr(){function n(n,e){var u=n-t,i=e-r,o=Math.sqrt(u*u+i*i);Mc+=o*(t+n)/2,_c+=o*(r+e)/2,bc+=o,Jr(t=n,r=e)}var t,r;Uc.point=function(e,u){Uc.point=n,Jr(t=e,r=u)}}function Gr(){Uc.point=Jr}function Kr(){function n(n,t){var r=n-e,i=t-u,o=Math.sqrt(r*r+i*i);Mc+=o*(e+n)/2,_c+=o*(u+t)/2,bc+=o,o=u*n-e*t,wc+=o*(e+n),Sc+=o*(u+t),kc+=3*o,Jr(e=n,u=t)}var t,r,e,u;Uc.point=function(i,o){Uc.point=n,Jr(t=e=i,r=u=o)},Uc.lineEnd=function(){n(t,r)}}function Qr(n){function t(t,r){n.moveTo(t,r),n.arc(t,r,o,0,Ea)}function r(t,r){n.moveTo(t,r),a.point=e}function e(t,r){n.lineTo(t,r)}function u(){a.point=t}function i(){n.closePath()}var o=4.5,a={point:t,lineStart:function(){a.point=r},lineEnd:u,polygonStart:function(){a.lineEnd=i},polygonEnd:function(){a.lineEnd=u,a.point=t},pointRadius:function(n){return o=n,a},result:v};return a}function ne(n){function t(n){return(a?e:r)(n)}function r(t){return ee(t,function(r,e){r=n(r,e),t.point(r[0],r[1])})}function e(t){function r(r,e){r=n(r,e),t.point(r[0],r[1])}function e(){x=0/0,S.point=i,t.lineStart()}function i(r,e){var i=pr([r,e]),o=n(r,e);u(x,M,y,_,b,w,x=o[0],M=o[1],y=r,_=i[0],b=i[1],w=i[2],a,t),t.point(x,M)}function o(){S.point=r,t.lineEnd()}function c(){e(),S.point=s,S.lineEnd=l}function s(n,t){i(f=n,h=t),g=x,p=M,v=_,d=b,m=w,S.point=i}function l(){u(x,M,y,_,b,w,g,p,f,v,d,m,a,t),S.lineEnd=o,o()}var f,h,g,p,v,d,m,y,x,M,_,b,w,S={point:r,lineStart:e,lineEnd:o,polygonStart:function(){t.polygonStart(),S.lineStart=c},polygonEnd:function(){t.polygonEnd(),S.lineStart=e}};return S}function u(t,r,e,a,c,s,l,f,h,g,p,v,d,m){var y=l-t,x=f-r,M=y*y+x*x;if(M>4*i&&d--){var _=a+g,b=c+p,w=s+v,S=Math.sqrt(_*_+b*b+w*w),k=Math.asin(w/=S),E=ca(ca(w)-1)i||ca((y*z+x*L)/M-.5)>.3||o>a*g+c*p+s*v)&&(u(t,r,e,a,c,s,C,N,E,_/=S,b/=S,w,d,m),m.point(C,N),u(C,N,E,_,b,w,l,f,h,g,p,v,d,m))}}var i=.5,o=Math.cos(30*za),a=16;return t.precision=function(n){return arguments.length?(a=(i=n*n)>0&&16,t):Math.sqrt(i)},t}function te(n){var t=ne(function(t,r){return n([t*La,r*La])});return function(n){return oe(t(n))}}function re(n){this.stream=n}function ee(n,t){return{point:t,sphere:function(){n.sphere()},lineStart:function(){n.lineStart()},lineEnd:function(){n.lineEnd()},polygonStart:function(){n.polygonStart()},polygonEnd:function(){n.polygonEnd()}}}function ue(n){return ie(function(){return n})()}function ie(n){function t(n){return n=a(n[0]*za,n[1]*za),[n[0]*h+c,s-n[1]*h]}function r(n){return n=a.invert((n[0]-c)/h,(s-n[1])/h),n&&[n[0]*La,n[1]*La]}function e(){a=Ir(o=se(m,y,x),i);var n=i(v,d);return c=g-n[0]*h,s=p+n[1]*h,u() +}function u(){return l&&(l.valid=!1,l=null),t}var i,o,a,c,s,l,f=ne(function(n,t){return n=i(n,t),[n[0]*h+c,s-n[1]*h]}),h=150,g=480,p=250,v=0,d=0,m=0,y=0,x=0,M=Ac,_=At,b=null,w=null;return t.stream=function(n){return l&&(l.valid=!1),l=oe(M(o,f(_(n)))),l.valid=!0,l},t.clipAngle=function(n){return arguments.length?(M=null==n?(b=n,Ac):Hr((b=+n)*za),u()):b},t.clipExtent=function(n){return arguments.length?(w=n,_=n?Or(n[0][0],n[0][1],n[1][0],n[1][1]):At,u()):w},t.scale=function(n){return arguments.length?(h=+n,e()):h},t.translate=function(n){return arguments.length?(g=+n[0],p=+n[1],e()):[g,p]},t.center=function(n){return arguments.length?(v=n[0]%360*za,d=n[1]%360*za,e()):[v*La,d*La]},t.rotate=function(n){return arguments.length?(m=n[0]%360*za,y=n[1]%360*za,x=n.length>2?n[2]%360*za:0,e()):[m*La,y*La,x*La]},Bo.rebind(t,f,"precision"),function(){return i=n.apply(this,arguments),t.invert=i.invert&&r,e()}}function oe(n){return ee(n,function(t,r){n.point(t*za,r*za)})}function ae(n,t){return[n,t]}function ce(n,t){return[n>ka?n-Ea:-ka>n?n+Ea:n,t]}function se(n,t,r){return n?t||r?Ir(fe(n),he(t,r)):fe(n):t||r?he(t,r):ce}function le(n){return function(t,r){return t+=n,[t>ka?t-Ea:-ka>t?t+Ea:t,r]}}function fe(n){var t=le(n);return t.invert=le(-n),t}function he(n,t){function r(n,t){var r=Math.cos(t),a=Math.cos(n)*r,c=Math.sin(n)*r,s=Math.sin(t),l=s*e+a*u;return[Math.atan2(c*i-l*o,a*e-s*u),G(l*i+c*o)]}var e=Math.cos(n),u=Math.sin(n),i=Math.cos(t),o=Math.sin(t);return r.invert=function(n,t){var r=Math.cos(t),a=Math.cos(n)*r,c=Math.sin(n)*r,s=Math.sin(t),l=s*i-c*o;return[Math.atan2(c*i+s*o,a*e+l*u),G(l*e-a*u)]},r}function ge(n,t){var r=Math.cos(n),e=Math.sin(n);return function(u,i,o,a){var c=o*t;null!=u?(u=pe(r,u),i=pe(r,i),(o>0?i>u:u>i)&&(u+=o*Ea)):(u=n+o*Ea,i=n-.5*c);for(var s,l=u;o>0?l>i:i>l;l-=c)a.point((s=Mr([r,-e*Math.cos(l),-e*Math.sin(l)]))[0],s[1])}}function pe(n,t){var r=pr(t);r[0]-=n,xr(r);var e=W(-r[1]);return((-r[2]<0?-e:e)+2*Math.PI-Ca)%(2*Math.PI)}function ve(n,t,r){var e=Bo.range(n,t-Ca,r).concat(t);return function(n){return e.map(function(t){return[n,t]})}}function de(n,t,r){var e=Bo.range(n,t-Ca,r).concat(t);return function(n){return e.map(function(t){return[t,n]})}}function me(n){return n.source}function ye(n){return n.target}function xe(n,t,r,e){var u=Math.cos(t),i=Math.sin(t),o=Math.cos(e),a=Math.sin(e),c=u*Math.cos(n),s=u*Math.sin(n),l=o*Math.cos(r),f=o*Math.sin(r),h=2*Math.asin(Math.sqrt(tt(e-t)+u*o*tt(r-n))),g=1/Math.sin(h),p=h?function(n){var t=Math.sin(n*=h)*g,r=Math.sin(h-n)*g,e=r*c+t*l,u=r*s+t*f,o=r*i+t*a;return[Math.atan2(u,e)*La,Math.atan2(o,Math.sqrt(e*e+u*u))*La]}:function(){return[n*La,t*La]};return p.distance=h,p}function Me(){function n(n,u){var i=Math.sin(u*=za),o=Math.cos(u),a=ca((n*=za)-t),c=Math.cos(a);jc+=Math.atan2(Math.sqrt((a=o*Math.sin(a))*a+(a=e*i-r*o*c)*a),r*i+e*o*c),t=n,r=i,e=o}var t,r,e;Hc.point=function(u,i){t=u*za,r=Math.sin(i*=za),e=Math.cos(i),Hc.point=n},Hc.lineEnd=function(){Hc.point=Hc.lineEnd=v}}function _e(n,t){function r(t,r){var e=Math.cos(t),u=Math.cos(r),i=n(e*u);return[i*u*Math.sin(t),i*Math.sin(r)]}return r.invert=function(n,r){var e=Math.sqrt(n*n+r*r),u=t(e),i=Math.sin(u),o=Math.cos(u);return[Math.atan2(n*i,e*o),Math.asin(e&&r*i/e)]},r}function be(n,t){function r(n,t){o>0?-Aa+Ca>t&&(t=-Aa+Ca):t>Aa-Ca&&(t=Aa-Ca);var r=o/Math.pow(u(t),i);return[r*Math.sin(i*n),o-r*Math.cos(i*n)]}var e=Math.cos(n),u=function(n){return Math.tan(ka/4+n/2)},i=n===t?Math.sin(n):Math.log(e/Math.cos(t))/Math.log(u(t)/u(n)),o=e*Math.pow(u(n),i)/i;return i?(r.invert=function(n,t){var r=o-t,e=B(i)*Math.sqrt(n*n+r*r);return[Math.atan2(n,r)/i,2*Math.atan(Math.pow(o/e,1/i))-Aa]},r):Se}function we(n,t){function r(n,t){var r=i-t;return[r*Math.sin(u*n),i-r*Math.cos(u*n)]}var e=Math.cos(n),u=n===t?Math.sin(n):(e-Math.cos(t))/(t-n),i=e/u+n;return ca(u)u;u++){for(;e>1&&J(n[r[e-2]],n[r[e-1]],n[u])<=0;)--e;r[e++]=u}return r.slice(0,e)}function ze(n,t){return n[0]-t[0]||n[1]-t[1]}function Le(n,t,r){return(r[0]-t[0])*(n[1]-t[1])<(r[1]-t[1])*(n[0]-t[0])}function Te(n,t,r,e){var u=n[0],i=r[0],o=t[0]-u,a=e[0]-i,c=n[1],s=r[1],l=t[1]-c,f=e[1]-s,h=(a*(c-s)-f*(u-i))/(f*o-a*l);return[u+h*o,c+h*l]}function qe(n){var t=n[0],r=n[n.length-1];return!(t[0]-r[0]||t[1]-r[1])}function Re(){tu(this),this.edge=this.site=this.circle=null}function De(n){var t=Gc.pop()||new Re;return t.site=n,t}function Pe(n){$e(n),Bc.remove(n),Gc.push(n),tu(n)}function Ue(n){var t=n.circle,r=t.x,e=t.cy,u={x:r,y:e},i=n.P,o=n.N,a=[n];Pe(n);for(var c=i;c.circle&&ca(r-c.circle.x)l;++l)s=a[l],c=a[l-1],Ke(s.edge,c.site,s.site,u);c=a[0],s=a[f-1],s.edge=We(c.site,s.site,null,u),Ve(c),Ve(s)}function je(n){for(var t,r,e,u,i=n.x,o=n.y,a=Bc._;a;)if(e=He(a,o)-i,e>Ca)a=a.L;else{if(u=i-Fe(a,o),!(u>Ca)){e>-Ca?(t=a.P,r=a):u>-Ca?(t=a,r=a.N):t=r=a;break}if(!a.R){t=a;break}a=a.R}var c=De(n);if(Bc.insert(t,c),t||r){if(t===r)return $e(t),r=De(t.site),Bc.insert(c,r),c.edge=r.edge=We(t.site,c.site),Ve(t),Ve(r),void 0;if(!r)return c.edge=We(t.site,c.site),void 0;$e(t),$e(r);var s=t.site,l=s.x,f=s.y,h=n.x-l,g=n.y-f,p=r.site,v=p.x-l,d=p.y-f,m=2*(h*d-g*v),y=h*h+g*g,x=v*v+d*d,M={x:(d*y-g*x)/m+l,y:(h*x-v*y)/m+f};Ke(r.edge,s,p,M),c.edge=We(s,n,null,M),r.edge=We(n,p,null,M),Ve(t),Ve(r)}}function He(n,t){var r=n.site,e=r.x,u=r.y,i=u-t;if(!i)return e;var o=n.P;if(!o)return-1/0;r=o.site;var a=r.x,c=r.y,s=c-t;if(!s)return a;var l=a-e,f=1/i-1/s,h=l/s;return f?(-h+Math.sqrt(h*h-2*f*(l*l/(-2*s)-c+s/2+u-i/2)))/f+e:(e+a)/2}function Fe(n,t){var r=n.N;if(r)return He(r,t);var e=n.site;return e.y===t?e.x:1/0}function Oe(n){this.site=n,this.edges=[]}function Ie(n){for(var t,r,e,u,i,o,a,c,s,l,f=n[0][0],h=n[1][0],g=n[0][1],p=n[1][1],v=Xc,d=v.length;d--;)if(i=v[d],i&&i.prepare())for(a=i.edges,c=a.length,o=0;c>o;)l=a[o].end(),e=l.x,u=l.y,s=a[++o%c].start(),t=s.x,r=s.y,(ca(e-t)>Ca||ca(u-r)>Ca)&&(a.splice(o,0,new Qe(Ge(i.site,l,ca(e-f)Ca?{x:f,y:ca(t-f)Ca?{x:ca(r-p)Ca?{x:h,y:ca(t-h)Ca?{x:ca(r-g)=-Na)){var g=c*c+s*s,p=l*l+f*f,v=(f*g-s*p)/h,d=(c*p-l*g)/h,f=d+a,m=Kc.pop()||new Ze;m.arc=n,m.site=u,m.x=v+o,m.y=f+Math.sqrt(v*v+d*d),m.cy=f,n.circle=m;for(var y=null,x=Wc._;x;)if(m.yd||d>=a)return;if(h>p){if(i){if(i.y>=s)return}else i={x:d,y:c};r={x:d,y:s}}else{if(i){if(i.ye||e>1)if(h>p){if(i){if(i.y>=s)return}else i={x:(c-u)/e,y:c};r={x:(s-u)/e,y:s}}else{if(i){if(i.yg){if(i){if(i.x>=a)return}else i={x:o,y:e*o+u};r={x:a,y:e*a+u}}else{if(i){if(i.xi&&(u=t.substring(i,u),a[o]?a[o]+=u:a[++o]=u),(r=r[0])===(e=e[0])?a[o]?a[o]+=e:a[++o]=e:(a[++o]=null,c.push({i:o,x:pu(r,e)})),i=ts.lastIndex;return ie;++e)a[(r=c[e]).i]=r.x(n);return a.join("")})}function du(n,t){for(var r,e=Bo.interpolators.length;--e>=0&&!(r=Bo.interpolators[e](n,t)););return r}function mu(n,t){var r,e=[],u=[],i=n.length,o=t.length,a=Math.min(n.length,t.length);for(r=0;a>r;++r)e.push(du(n[r],t[r]));for(;i>r;++r)u[r]=n[r];for(;o>r;++r)u[r]=t[r];return function(n){for(r=0;a>r;++r)u[r]=e[r](n);return u}}function yu(n){return function(t){return 0>=t?0:t>=1?1:n(t)}}function xu(n){return function(t){return 1-n(1-t)}}function Mu(n){return function(t){return.5*(.5>t?n(2*t):2-n(2-2*t))}}function _u(n){return n*n}function bu(n){return n*n*n}function wu(n){if(0>=n)return 0;if(n>=1)return 1;var t=n*n,r=t*n;return 4*(.5>n?r:3*(n-t)+r-.75)}function Su(n){return function(t){return Math.pow(t,n)}}function ku(n){return 1-Math.cos(n*Aa)}function Eu(n){return Math.pow(2,10*(n-1))}function Au(n){return 1-Math.sqrt(1-n*n)}function Cu(n,t){var r;return arguments.length<2&&(t=.45),arguments.length?r=t/Ea*Math.asin(1/n):(n=1,r=t/4),function(e){return 1+n*Math.pow(2,-10*e)*Math.sin((e-r)*Ea/t)}}function Nu(n){return n||(n=1.70158),function(t){return t*t*((n+1)*t-n)}}function zu(n){return 1/2.75>n?7.5625*n*n:2/2.75>n?7.5625*(n-=1.5/2.75)*n+.75:2.5/2.75>n?7.5625*(n-=2.25/2.75)*n+.9375:7.5625*(n-=2.625/2.75)*n+.984375}function Lu(n,t){n=Bo.hcl(n),t=Bo.hcl(t);var r=n.h,e=n.c,u=n.l,i=t.h-r,o=t.c-e,a=t.l-u;return isNaN(o)&&(o=0,e=isNaN(e)?t.c:e),isNaN(i)?(i=0,r=isNaN(r)?t.h:r):i>180?i-=360:-180>i&&(i+=360),function(n){return ct(r+i*n,e+o*n,u+a*n)+""}}function Tu(n,t){n=Bo.hsl(n),t=Bo.hsl(t);var r=n.h,e=n.s,u=n.l,i=t.h-r,o=t.s-e,a=t.l-u;return isNaN(o)&&(o=0,e=isNaN(e)?t.s:e),isNaN(i)?(i=0,r=isNaN(r)?t.h:r):i>180?i-=360:-180>i&&(i+=360),function(n){return it(r+i*n,e+o*n,u+a*n)+""}}function qu(n,t){n=Bo.lab(n),t=Bo.lab(t);var r=n.l,e=n.a,u=n.b,i=t.l-r,o=t.a-e,a=t.b-u;return function(n){return ft(r+i*n,e+o*n,u+a*n)+""}}function Ru(n,t){return t-=n,function(r){return Math.round(n+t*r)}}function Du(n){var t=[n.a,n.b],r=[n.c,n.d],e=Uu(t),u=Pu(t,r),i=Uu(ju(r,t,-u))||0;t[0]*r[1]180?l+=360:l-s>180&&(s+=360),u.push({i:e.push(e.pop()+"rotate(",null,")")-2,x:pu(s,l)})):l&&e.push(e.pop()+"rotate("+l+")"),f!=h?u.push({i:e.push(e.pop()+"skewX(",null,")")-2,x:pu(f,h)}):h&&e.push(e.pop()+"skewX("+h+")"),g[0]!=p[0]||g[1]!=p[1]?(r=e.push(e.pop()+"scale(",null,",",null,")"),u.push({i:r-4,x:pu(g[0],p[0])},{i:r-2,x:pu(g[1],p[1])})):(1!=p[0]||1!=p[1])&&e.push(e.pop()+"scale("+p+")"),r=u.length,function(n){for(var t,i=-1;++i=0;)r.push(u[e])}function Ku(n,t){for(var r=[n],e=[];null!=(n=r.pop());)if(e.push(n),(i=n.children)&&(u=i.length))for(var u,i,o=-1;++or;++r)(t=n[r][1])>u&&(e=r,u=t);return e}function si(n){return n.reduce(li,0)}function li(n,t){return n+t[1]}function fi(n,t){return hi(n,Math.ceil(Math.log(t.length)/Math.LN2+1))}function hi(n,t){for(var r=-1,e=+n[0],u=(n[1]-e)/t,i=[];++r<=t;)i[r]=u*r+e;return i}function gi(n){return[Bo.min(n),Bo.max(n)]}function pi(n,t){return n.value-t.value}function vi(n,t){var r=n._pack_next;n._pack_next=t,t._pack_prev=n,t._pack_next=r,r._pack_prev=t}function di(n,t){n._pack_next=t,t._pack_prev=n}function mi(n,t){var r=t.x-n.x,e=t.y-n.y,u=n.r+t.r;return.999*u*u>r*r+e*e}function yi(n){function t(n){l=Math.min(n.x-n.r,l),f=Math.max(n.x+n.r,f),h=Math.min(n.y-n.r,h),g=Math.max(n.y+n.r,g)}if((r=n.children)&&(s=r.length)){var r,e,u,i,o,a,c,s,l=1/0,f=-1/0,h=1/0,g=-1/0;if(r.forEach(xi),e=r[0],e.x=-e.r,e.y=0,t(e),s>1&&(u=r[1],u.x=u.r,u.y=0,t(u),s>2))for(i=r[2],bi(e,u,i),t(i),vi(e,i),e._pack_prev=i,vi(i,u),u=e._pack_next,o=3;s>o;o++){bi(e,u,i=r[o]);var p=0,v=1,d=1;for(a=u._pack_next;a!==u;a=a._pack_next,v++)if(mi(a,i)){p=1;break}if(1==p)for(c=e._pack_prev;c!==a._pack_prev&&!mi(c,i);c=c._pack_prev,d++);p?(d>v||v==d&&u.ro;o++)i=r[o],i.x-=m,i.y-=y,x=Math.max(x,i.r+Math.sqrt(i.x*i.x+i.y*i.y));n.r=x,r.forEach(Mi)}}function xi(n){n._pack_next=n._pack_prev=n}function Mi(n){delete n._pack_next,delete n._pack_prev}function _i(n,t,r,e){var u=n.children;if(n.x=t+=e*n.x,n.y=r+=e*n.y,n.r*=e,u)for(var i=-1,o=u.length;++i=0;)t=u[i],t.z+=r,t.m+=r,r+=t.s+(e+=t.c)}function Ci(n,t,r){return n.a.parent===t.parent?n.a:r}function Ni(n){return 1+Bo.max(n,function(n){return n.y})}function zi(n){return n.reduce(function(n,t){return n+t.x},0)/n.length}function Li(n){var t=n.children;return t&&t.length?Li(t[0]):n}function Ti(n){var t,r=n.children;return r&&(t=r.length)?Ti(r[t-1]):n}function qi(n){return{x:n.x,y:n.y,dx:n.dx,dy:n.dy}}function Ri(n,t){var r=n.x+t[3],e=n.y+t[0],u=n.dx-t[1]-t[3],i=n.dy-t[0]-t[2];return 0>u&&(r+=u/2,u=0),0>i&&(e+=i/2,i=0),{x:r,y:e,dx:u,dy:i}}function Di(n){var t=n[0],r=n[n.length-1];return r>t?[t,r]:[r,t]}function Pi(n){return n.rangeExtent?n.rangeExtent():Di(n.range())}function Ui(n,t,r,e){var u=r(n[0],n[1]),i=e(t[0],t[1]);return function(n){return i(u(n))}}function ji(n,t){var r,e=0,u=n.length-1,i=n[e],o=n[u];return i>o&&(r=e,e=u,u=r,r=i,i=o,o=r),n[e]=t.floor(i),n[u]=t.ceil(o),n}function Hi(n){return n?{floor:function(t){return Math.floor(t/n)*n},ceil:function(t){return Math.ceil(t/n)*n}}:hs}function Fi(n,t,r,e){var u=[],i=[],o=0,a=Math.min(n.length,t.length)-1;for(n[a]2?Fi:Ui,c=e?Ou:Fu;return o=u(n,t,c,r),a=u(t,n,c,du),i}function i(n){return o(n)}var o,a;return i.invert=function(n){return a(n)},i.domain=function(t){return arguments.length?(n=t.map(Number),u()):n},i.range=function(n){return arguments.length?(t=n,u()):t},i.rangeRound=function(n){return i.range(n).interpolate(Ru)},i.clamp=function(n){return arguments.length?(e=n,u()):e},i.interpolate=function(n){return arguments.length?(r=n,u()):r},i.ticks=function(t){return Vi(n,t)},i.tickFormat=function(t,r){return $i(n,t,r)},i.nice=function(t){return Yi(n,t),u()},i.copy=function(){return Oi(n,t,r,e)},u()}function Ii(n,t){return Bo.rebind(n,t,"range","rangeRound","interpolate","clamp")}function Yi(n,t){return ji(n,Hi(Zi(n,t)[2]))}function Zi(n,t){null==t&&(t=10);var r=Di(n),e=r[1]-r[0],u=Math.pow(10,Math.floor(Math.log(e/t)/Math.LN10)),i=t/e*u;return.15>=i?u*=10:.35>=i?u*=5:.75>=i&&(u*=2),r[0]=Math.ceil(r[0]/u)*u,r[1]=Math.floor(r[1]/u)*u+.5*u,r[2]=u,r}function Vi(n,t){return Bo.range.apply(Bo,Zi(n,t))}function $i(n,t,r){var e=Zi(n,t);if(r){var u=nc.exec(r);if(u.shift(),"s"===u[8]){var i=Bo.formatPrefix(Math.max(ca(e[0]),ca(e[1])));return u[7]||(u[7]="."+Xi(i.scale(e[2]))),u[8]="f",r=Bo.format(u.join("")),function(n){return r(i.scale(n))+i.symbol}}u[7]||(u[7]="."+Bi(u[8],e)),r=u.join("")}else r=",."+Xi(e[2])+"f";return Bo.format(r)}function Xi(n){return-Math.floor(Math.log(n)/Math.LN10+.01)}function Bi(n,t){var r=Xi(t[2]);return n in gs?Math.abs(r-Xi(Math.max(ca(t[0]),ca(t[1]))))+ +("e"!==n):r-2*("%"===n)}function Ji(n,t,r,e){function u(n){return(r?Math.log(0>n?0:n):-Math.log(n>0?0:-n))/Math.log(t)}function i(n){return r?Math.pow(t,n):-Math.pow(t,-n)}function o(t){return n(u(t))}return o.invert=function(t){return i(n.invert(t))},o.domain=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=t[0]>=0,n.domain((e=t.map(Number)).map(u)),o):e},o.base=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=+r,n.domain(e.map(u)),o):t},o.nice=function(){var t=ji(e.map(u),r?Math:vs);return n.domain(t),e=t.map(i),o},o.ticks=function(){var n=Di(e),o=[],a=n[0],c=n[1],s=Math.floor(u(a)),l=Math.ceil(u(c)),f=t%1?2:t;if(isFinite(l-s)){if(r){for(;l>s;s++)for(var h=1;f>h;h++)o.push(i(s)*h);o.push(i(s))}else for(o.push(i(s));s++0;h--)o.push(i(s)*h);for(s=0;o[s]c;l--);o=o.slice(s,l)}return o},o.tickFormat=function(n,t){if(!arguments.length)return ps;arguments.length<2?t=ps:"function"!=typeof t&&(t=Bo.format(t));var e,a=Math.max(.1,n/o.ticks().length),c=r?(e=1e-12,Math.ceil):(e=-1e-12,Math.floor);return function(n){return n/i(c(u(n)+e))<=a?t(n):""}},o.copy=function(){return Ji(n.copy(),t,r,e)},Ii(o,n)}function Wi(n,t,r){function e(t){return n(u(t))}var u=Gi(t),i=Gi(1/t);return e.invert=function(t){return i(n.invert(t))},e.domain=function(t){return arguments.length?(n.domain((r=t.map(Number)).map(u)),e):r},e.ticks=function(n){return Vi(r,n)},e.tickFormat=function(n,t){return $i(r,n,t)},e.nice=function(n){return e.domain(Yi(r,n))},e.exponent=function(o){return arguments.length?(u=Gi(t=o),i=Gi(1/t),n.domain(r.map(u)),e):t},e.copy=function(){return Wi(n.copy(),t,r)},Ii(e,n)}function Gi(n){return function(t){return 0>t?-Math.pow(-t,n):Math.pow(t,n)}}function Ki(n,t){function r(r){return i[((u.get(r)||("range"===t.t?u.set(r,n.push(r)):0/0))-1)%i.length]}function e(t,r){return Bo.range(n.length).map(function(n){return t+r*n})}var u,i,a;return r.domain=function(e){if(!arguments.length)return n;n=[],u=new o;for(var i,a=-1,c=e.length;++an?[0/0,0/0]:[n>0?o[n-1]:r[0],nt?0/0:t/i+n,[t,t+1/i]},e.copy=function(){return no(n,t,r)},u()}function to(n,t){function r(r){return r>=r?t[Bo.bisect(n,r)]:void 0}return r.domain=function(t){return arguments.length?(n=t,r):n},r.range=function(n){return arguments.length?(t=n,r):t},r.invertExtent=function(r){return r=t.indexOf(r),[n[r-1],n[r]]},r.copy=function(){return to(n,t)},r}function ro(n){function t(n){return+n}return t.invert=t,t.domain=t.range=function(r){return arguments.length?(n=r.map(t),t):n},t.ticks=function(t){return Vi(n,t)},t.tickFormat=function(t,r){return $i(n,t,r)},t.copy=function(){return ro(n)},t}function eo(n){return n.innerRadius}function uo(n){return n.outerRadius}function io(n){return n.startAngle}function oo(n){return n.endAngle}function ao(n){function t(t){function o(){s.push("M",i(n(l),a))}for(var c,s=[],l=[],f=-1,h=t.length,g=Et(r),p=Et(e);++f1&&u.push("H",e[0]),u.join("")}function fo(n){for(var t=0,r=n.length,e=n[0],u=[e[0],",",e[1]];++t1){a=t[1],i=n[c],c++,e+="C"+(u[0]+o[0])+","+(u[1]+o[1])+","+(i[0]-a[0])+","+(i[1]-a[1])+","+i[0]+","+i[1];for(var s=2;s9&&(u=3*t/Math.sqrt(u),o[a]=u*r,o[a+1]=u*e));for(a=-1;++a<=c;)u=(n[Math.min(c,a+1)][0]-n[Math.max(0,a-1)][0])/(6*(1+o[a]*o[a])),i.push([u||0,o[a]*u||0]);return i}function Co(n){return n.length<3?co(n):n[0]+mo(n,Ao(n))}function No(n){for(var t,r,e,u=-1,i=n.length;++ur?s():(u.active=r,i.event&&i.event.start.call(n,l,t),i.tween.forEach(function(r,e){(e=e.call(n,l,t))&&v.push(e)}),Bo.timer(function(){return p.c=c(e||1)?Ar:c,1},0,a),void 0)}function c(e){if(u.active!==r)return s();for(var o=e/g,a=f(o),c=v.length;c>0;)v[--c].call(n,a);return o>=1?(i.event&&i.event.end.call(n,l,t),s()):void 0}function s(){return--u.count?delete u[r]:delete n.__transition__,1}var l=n.__data__,f=i.ease,h=i.delay,g=i.duration,p=Ga,v=[];return p.t=h+a,e>=h?o(e-h):(p.c=o,void 0)},0,a)}}function Oo(n,t){n.attr("transform",function(n){return"translate("+t(n)+",0)"})}function Io(n,t){n.attr("transform",function(n){return"translate(0,"+t(n)+")"})}function Yo(n){return n.toISOString()}function Zo(n,t,r){function e(t){return n(t)}function u(n,r){var e=n[1]-n[0],u=e/r,i=Bo.bisect(Fs,u);return i==Fs.length?[t.year,Zi(n.map(function(n){return n/31536e6}),r)[2]]:i?t[u/Fs[i-1]1?{floor:function(t){for(;r(t=n.floor(t));)t=Vo(t-1);return t},ceil:function(t){for(;r(t=n.ceil(t));)t=Vo(+t+1);return t}}:n))},e.ticks=function(n,t){var r=Di(e.domain()),i=null==n?u(r,10):"number"==typeof n?u(r,n):!n.range&&[{range:n},t];return i&&(n=i[0],t=i[1]),n.range(r[0],Vo(+r[1]+1),1>t?1:t)},e.tickFormat=function(){return r},e.copy=function(){return Zo(n.copy(),t,r)},Ii(e,n)}function Vo(n){return new Date(n)}function $o(n){return JSON.parse(n.responseText)}function Xo(n){var t=Go.createRange();return t.selectNode(Go.body),t.createContextualFragment(n.responseText)}var Bo={version:"3.4.8"};Date.now||(Date.now=function(){return+new Date});var Jo=[].slice,Wo=function(n){return Jo.call(n)},Go=document,Ko=Go.documentElement,Qo=window;try{Wo(Ko.childNodes)[0].nodeType}catch(na){Wo=function(n){for(var t=n.length,r=new Array(t);t--;)r[t]=n[t];return r}}try{Go.createElement("div").style.setProperty("opacity",0,"")}catch(ta){var ra=Qo.Element.prototype,ea=ra.setAttribute,ua=ra.setAttributeNS,ia=Qo.CSSStyleDeclaration.prototype,oa=ia.setProperty;ra.setAttribute=function(n,t){ea.call(this,n,t+"")},ra.setAttributeNS=function(n,t,r){ua.call(this,n,t,r+"")},ia.setProperty=function(n,t,r){oa.call(this,n,t+"",r)}}Bo.ascending=n,Bo.descending=function(n,t){return n>t?-1:t>n?1:t>=n?0:0/0},Bo.min=function(n,t){var r,e,u=-1,i=n.length;if(1===arguments.length){for(;++u=r);)r=void 0;for(;++ue&&(r=e)}else{for(;++u=r);)r=void 0;for(;++ue&&(r=e)}return r},Bo.max=function(n,t){var r,e,u=-1,i=n.length;if(1===arguments.length){for(;++u=r);)r=void 0;for(;++ur&&(r=e)}else{for(;++u=r);)r=void 0;for(;++ur&&(r=e)}return r},Bo.extent=function(n,t){var r,e,u,i=-1,o=n.length;if(1===arguments.length){for(;++i=r);)r=u=void 0;for(;++ie&&(r=e),e>u&&(u=e))}else{for(;++i=r);)r=void 0;for(;++ie&&(r=e),e>u&&(u=e))}return[r,u]},Bo.sum=function(n,t){var r,e=0,u=n.length,i=-1;if(1===arguments.length)for(;++i1&&(r=r.map(e)),r=r.filter(t),r.length?Bo.quantile(r.sort(n),.5):void 0};var aa=r(n);Bo.bisectLeft=aa.left,Bo.bisect=Bo.bisectRight=aa.right,Bo.bisector=function(t){return r(1===t.length?function(r,e){return n(t(r),e)}:t)},Bo.shuffle=function(n){for(var t,r,e=n.length;e;)r=0|Math.random()*e--,t=n[e],n[e]=n[r],n[r]=t;return n},Bo.permute=function(n,t){for(var r=t.length,e=new Array(r);r--;)e[r]=n[t[r]];return e},Bo.pairs=function(n){for(var t,r=0,e=n.length-1,u=n[0],i=new Array(0>e?0:e);e>r;)i[r]=[t=u,u=n[++r]];return i},Bo.zip=function(){if(!(u=arguments.length))return[];for(var n=-1,t=Bo.min(arguments,e),r=new Array(t);++n=0;)for(e=n[u],t=e.length;--t>=0;)r[--o]=e[t];return r};var ca=Math.abs;Bo.range=function(n,t,r){if(arguments.length<3&&(r=1,arguments.length<2&&(t=n,n=0)),1/0===(t-n)/r)throw new Error("infinite range");var e,i=[],o=u(ca(r)),a=-1;if(n*=o,t*=o,r*=o,0>r)for(;(e=n+r*++a)>t;)i.push(e/o);else for(;(e=n+r*++a)=i.length)return e?e.call(u,a):r?a.sort(r):a;for(var s,l,f,h,g=-1,p=a.length,v=i[c++],d=new o;++g=i.length)return n;var e=[],u=a[r++];return n.forEach(function(n,u){e.push({key:n,values:t(u,r)})}),u?e.sort(function(n,t){return u(n.key,t.key)}):e}var r,e,u={},i=[],a=[];return u.map=function(t,r){return n(r,t,0)},u.entries=function(r){return t(n(Bo.map,r,0),0)},u.key=function(n){return i.push(n),u},u.sortKeys=function(n){return a[i.length-1]=n,u},u.sortValues=function(n){return r=n,u},u.rollup=function(n){return e=n,u},u},Bo.set=function(n){var t=new h;if(n)for(var r=0,e=n.length;e>r;++r)t.add(n[r]);return t},i(h,{has:a,add:function(n){return this[sa+n]=!0,n},remove:function(n){return n=sa+n,n in this&&delete this[n]},values:s,size:l,empty:f,forEach:function(n){for(var t in this)t.charCodeAt(0)===la&&n.call(this,t.substring(1))}}),Bo.behavior={},Bo.rebind=function(n,t){for(var r,e=1,u=arguments.length;++e=0&&(e=n.substring(r+1),n=n.substring(0,r)),n)return arguments.length<2?this[n].on(e):this[n].on(e,t);if(2===arguments.length){if(null==t)for(n in this)this.hasOwnProperty(n)&&this[n].on(e,null);return this}},Bo.event=null,Bo.requote=function(n){return n.replace(ha,"\\$&")};var ha=/[\\\^\$\*\+\?\|\[\]\(\)\.\{\}]/g,ga={}.__proto__?function(n,t){n.__proto__=t}:function(n,t){for(var r in t)n[r]=t[r]},pa=function(n,t){return t.querySelector(n)},va=function(n,t){return t.querySelectorAll(n)},da=Ko[p(Ko,"matchesSelector")],ma=function(n,t){return da.call(n,t)};"function"==typeof Sizzle&&(pa=function(n,t){return Sizzle(n,t)[0]||null},va=Sizzle,ma=Sizzle.matchesSelector),Bo.selection=function(){return _a};var ya=Bo.selection.prototype=[];ya.select=function(n){var t,r,e,u,i=[];n=b(n);for(var o=-1,a=this.length;++o=0&&(r=n.substring(0,t),n=n.substring(t+1)),xa.hasOwnProperty(r)?{space:xa[r],local:n}:n}},ya.attr=function(n,t){if(arguments.length<2){if("string"==typeof n){var r=this.node();return n=Bo.ns.qualify(n),n.local?r.getAttributeNS(n.space,n.local):r.getAttribute(n)}for(t in n)this.each(S(t,n[t]));return this}return this.each(S(n,t))},ya.classed=function(n,t){if(arguments.length<2){if("string"==typeof n){var r=this.node(),e=(n=A(n)).length,u=-1;if(t=r.classList){for(;++ue){if("string"!=typeof n){2>e&&(t="");for(r in n)this.each(z(r,n[r],t));return this}if(2>e)return Qo.getComputedStyle(this.node(),null).getPropertyValue(n);r=""}return this.each(z(n,t,r))},ya.property=function(n,t){if(arguments.length<2){if("string"==typeof n)return this.node()[n];for(t in n)this.each(L(t,n[t]));return this}return this.each(L(n,t))},ya.text=function(n){return arguments.length?this.each("function"==typeof n?function(){var t=n.apply(this,arguments);this.textContent=null==t?"":t}:null==n?function(){this.textContent=""}:function(){this.textContent=n}):this.node().textContent},ya.html=function(n){return arguments.length?this.each("function"==typeof n?function(){var t=n.apply(this,arguments);this.innerHTML=null==t?"":t}:null==n?function(){this.innerHTML=""}:function(){this.innerHTML=n}):this.node().innerHTML},ya.append=function(n){return n=T(n),this.select(function(){return this.appendChild(n.apply(this,arguments))})},ya.insert=function(n,t){return n=T(n),t=b(t),this.select(function(){return this.insertBefore(n.apply(this,arguments),t.apply(this,arguments)||null)})},ya.remove=function(){return this.each(function(){var n=this.parentNode;n&&n.removeChild(this)})},ya.data=function(n,t){function r(n,r){var e,u,i,a=n.length,f=r.length,h=Math.min(a,f),g=new Array(f),p=new Array(f),v=new Array(a);if(t){var d,m=new o,y=new o,x=[];for(e=-1;++ee;++e)p[e]=q(r[e]);for(;a>e;++e)v[e]=n[e]}p.update=g,p.parentNode=g.parentNode=v.parentNode=n.parentNode,c.push(p),s.push(g),l.push(v)}var e,u,i=-1,a=this.length;if(!arguments.length){for(n=new Array(a=(e=this[0]).length);++ii;i++){u.push(t=[]),t.parentNode=(r=this[i]).parentNode;for(var a=0,c=r.length;c>a;a++)(e=r[a])&&n.call(e,e.__data__,a,i)&&t.push(e)}return _(u)},ya.order=function(){for(var n=-1,t=this.length;++n=0;)(r=e[u])&&(i&&i!==r.nextSibling&&i.parentNode.insertBefore(r,i),i=r);return this},ya.sort=function(n){n=D.apply(this,arguments);for(var t=-1,r=this.length;++tn;n++)for(var r=this[n],e=0,u=r.length;u>e;e++){var i=r[e];if(i)return i}return null},ya.size=function(){var n=0;return this.each(function(){++n}),n};var Ma=[];Bo.selection.enter=U,Bo.selection.enter.prototype=Ma,Ma.append=ya.append,Ma.empty=ya.empty,Ma.node=ya.node,Ma.call=ya.call,Ma.size=ya.size,Ma.select=function(n){for(var t,r,e,u,i,o=[],a=-1,c=this.length;++ae){if("string"!=typeof n){2>e&&(t=!1);for(r in n)this.each(F(r,n[r],t));return this}if(2>e)return(e=this.node()["__on"+n])&&e._;r=!1}return this.each(F(n,t,r))};var ba=Bo.map({mouseenter:"mouseover",mouseleave:"mouseout"});ba.forEach(function(n){"on"+n in Go&&ba.remove(n)});var wa="onselectstart"in Go?null:p(Ko.style,"userSelect"),Sa=0;Bo.mouse=function(n){return Z(n,x())},Bo.touches=function(n,t){return arguments.length<2&&(t=x().touches),t?Wo(t).map(function(t){var r=Z(n,t);return r.identifier=t.identifier,r}):[]},Bo.behavior.drag=function(){function n(){this.on("mousedown.drag",u).on("touchstart.drag",i)}function t(n,t,u,i,o){return function(){function a(){var n,r,e=t(h,v);e&&(n=e[0]-x[0],r=e[1]-x[1],p|=n|r,x=e,g({type:"drag",x:e[0]+s[0],y:e[1]+s[1],dx:n,dy:r}))}function c(){t(h,v)&&(m.on(i+d,null).on(o+d,null),y(p&&Bo.event.target===f),g({type:"dragend"}))}var s,l=this,f=Bo.event.target,h=l.parentNode,g=r.of(l,arguments),p=0,v=n(),d=".drag"+(null==v?"":"-"+v),m=Bo.select(u()).on(i+d,a).on(o+d,c),y=Y(),x=t(h,v);e?(s=e.apply(l,arguments),s=[s.x-x[0],s.y-x[1]]):s=[0,0],g({type:"dragstart"})}}var r=M(n,"drag","dragstart","dragend"),e=null,u=t(v,Bo.mouse,X,"mousemove","mouseup"),i=t(V,Bo.touch,$,"touchmove","touchend");return n.origin=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=t,n):e},Bo.rebind(n,r,"on")};var ka=Math.PI,Ea=2*ka,Aa=ka/2,Ca=1e-6,Na=Ca*Ca,za=ka/180,La=180/ka,Ta=Math.SQRT2,qa=2,Ra=4;Bo.interpolateZoom=function(n,t){function r(n){var t=n*y;if(m){var r=Q(v),o=i/(qa*h)*(r*nt(Ta*t+v)-K(v));return[e+o*s,u+o*l,i*r/Q(Ta*t+v)]}return[e+n*s,u+n*l,i*Math.exp(Ta*t)]}var e=n[0],u=n[1],i=n[2],o=t[0],a=t[1],c=t[2],s=o-e,l=a-u,f=s*s+l*l,h=Math.sqrt(f),g=(c*c-i*i+Ra*f)/(2*i*qa*h),p=(c*c-i*i-Ra*f)/(2*c*qa*h),v=Math.log(Math.sqrt(g*g+1)-g),d=Math.log(Math.sqrt(p*p+1)-p),m=d-v,y=(m||Math.log(c/i))/Ta;return r.duration=1e3*y,r},Bo.behavior.zoom=function(){function n(n){n.on(A,s).on(Ua+".zoom",f).on(C,h).on("dblclick.zoom",g).on(z,l)}function t(n){return[(n[0]-S.x)/S.k,(n[1]-S.y)/S.k]}function r(n){return[n[0]*S.k+S.x,n[1]*S.k+S.y]}function e(n){S.k=Math.max(E[0],Math.min(E[1],n))}function u(n,t){t=r(t),S.x+=n[0]-t[0],S.y+=n[1]-t[1]}function i(){_&&_.domain(x.range().map(function(n){return(n-S.x)/S.k}).map(x.invert)),w&&w.domain(b.range().map(function(n){return(n-S.y)/S.k}).map(b.invert))}function o(n){n({type:"zoomstart"})}function a(n){i(),n({type:"zoom",scale:S.k,translate:[S.x,S.y]})}function c(n){n({type:"zoomend"})}function s(){function n(){l=1,u(Bo.mouse(e),g),a(s)}function r(){f.on(C,Qo===e?h:null).on(N,null),p(l&&Bo.event.target===i),c(s)}var e=this,i=Bo.event.target,s=L.of(e,arguments),l=0,f=Bo.select(Qo).on(C,n).on(N,r),g=t(Bo.mouse(e)),p=Y();H.call(e),o(s)}function l(){function n(){var n=Bo.touches(g);return h=S.k,n.forEach(function(n){n.identifier in v&&(v[n.identifier]=t(n))}),n}function r(){var t=Bo.event.target;Bo.select(t).on(M,i).on(_,f),b.push(t);for(var r=Bo.event.changedTouches,o=0,c=r.length;c>o;++o)v[r[o].identifier]=null;var s=n(),l=Date.now();if(1===s.length){if(500>l-m){var h=s[0],g=v[h.identifier];e(2*S.k),u(h,g),y(),a(p)}m=l}else if(s.length>1){var h=s[0],x=s[1],w=h[0]-x[0],k=h[1]-x[1];d=w*w+k*k}}function i(){for(var n,t,r,i,o=Bo.touches(g),c=0,s=o.length;s>c;++c,i=null)if(r=o[c],i=v[r.identifier]){if(t)break;n=r,t=i}if(i){var l=(l=r[0]-n[0])*l+(l=r[1]-n[1])*l,f=d&&Math.sqrt(l/d);n=[(n[0]+r[0])/2,(n[1]+r[1])/2],t=[(t[0]+i[0])/2,(t[1]+i[1])/2],e(f*h)}m=null,u(n,t),a(p)}function f(){if(Bo.event.touches.length){for(var t=Bo.event.changedTouches,r=0,e=t.length;e>r;++r)delete v[t[r].identifier];for(var u in v)return void n()}Bo.selectAll(b).on(x,null),w.on(A,s).on(z,l),k(),c(p)}var h,g=this,p=L.of(g,arguments),v={},d=0,x=".zoom-"+Bo.event.changedTouches[0].identifier,M="touchmove"+x,_="touchend"+x,b=[],w=Bo.select(g).on(A,null).on(z,r),k=Y();H.call(g),r(),o(p)}function f(){var n=L.of(this,arguments);d?clearTimeout(d):(H.call(this),o(n)),d=setTimeout(function(){d=null,c(n)},50),y();var r=v||Bo.mouse(this);p||(p=t(r)),e(Math.pow(2,.002*Da())*S.k),u(r,p),a(n)}function h(){p=null}function g(){var n=L.of(this,arguments),r=Bo.mouse(this),i=t(r),s=Math.log(S.k)/Math.LN2;o(n),e(Math.pow(2,Bo.event.shiftKey?Math.ceil(s)-1:Math.floor(s)+1)),u(r,i),a(n),c(n)}var p,v,d,m,x,_,b,w,S={x:0,y:0,k:1},k=[960,500],E=Pa,A="mousedown.zoom",C="mousemove.zoom",N="mouseup.zoom",z="touchstart.zoom",L=M(n,"zoomstart","zoom","zoomend");return n.event=function(n){n.each(function(){var n=L.of(this,arguments),t=S;As?Bo.select(this).transition().each("start.zoom",function(){S=this.__chart__||{x:0,y:0,k:1},o(n)}).tween("zoom:zoom",function(){var r=k[0],e=k[1],u=r/2,i=e/2,o=Bo.interpolateZoom([(u-S.x)/S.k,(i-S.y)/S.k,r/S.k],[(u-t.x)/t.k,(i-t.y)/t.k,r/t.k]);return function(t){var e=o(t),c=r/e[2];this.__chart__=S={x:u-e[0]*c,y:i-e[1]*c,k:c},a(n)}}).each("end.zoom",function(){c(n)}):(this.__chart__=S,o(n),a(n),c(n))})},n.translate=function(t){return arguments.length?(S={x:+t[0],y:+t[1],k:S.k},i(),n):[S.x,S.y]},n.scale=function(t){return arguments.length?(S={x:S.x,y:S.y,k:+t},i(),n):S.k},n.scaleExtent=function(t){return arguments.length?(E=null==t?Pa:[+t[0],+t[1]],n):E},n.center=function(t){return arguments.length?(v=t&&[+t[0],+t[1]],n):v},n.size=function(t){return arguments.length?(k=t&&[+t[0],+t[1]],n):k},n.x=function(t){return arguments.length?(_=t,x=t.copy(),S={x:0,y:0,k:1},n):_},n.y=function(t){return arguments.length?(w=t,b=t.copy(),S={x:0,y:0,k:1},n):w},Bo.rebind(n,L,"on")};var Da,Pa=[0,1/0],Ua="onwheel"in Go?(Da=function(){return-Bo.event.deltaY*(Bo.event.deltaMode?120:1)},"wheel"):"onmousewheel"in Go?(Da=function(){return Bo.event.wheelDelta},"mousewheel"):(Da=function(){return-Bo.event.detail},"MozMousePixelScroll");rt.prototype.toString=function(){return this.rgb()+""},Bo.hsl=function(n,t,r){return 1===arguments.length?n instanceof ut?et(n.h,n.s,n.l):_t(""+n,bt,et):et(+n,+t,+r)};var ja=ut.prototype=new rt;ja.brighter=function(n){return n=Math.pow(.7,arguments.length?n:1),et(this.h,this.s,this.l/n)},ja.darker=function(n){return n=Math.pow(.7,arguments.length?n:1),et(this.h,this.s,n*this.l)},ja.rgb=function(){return it(this.h,this.s,this.l)},Bo.hcl=function(n,t,r){return 1===arguments.length?n instanceof at?ot(n.h,n.c,n.l):n instanceof lt?ht(n.l,n.a,n.b):ht((n=wt((n=Bo.rgb(n)).r,n.g,n.b)).l,n.a,n.b):ot(+n,+t,+r)};var Ha=at.prototype=new rt;Ha.brighter=function(n){return ot(this.h,this.c,Math.min(100,this.l+Fa*(arguments.length?n:1)))},Ha.darker=function(n){return ot(this.h,this.c,Math.max(0,this.l-Fa*(arguments.length?n:1)))},Ha.rgb=function(){return ct(this.h,this.c,this.l).rgb()},Bo.lab=function(n,t,r){return 1===arguments.length?n instanceof lt?st(n.l,n.a,n.b):n instanceof at?ct(n.l,n.c,n.h):wt((n=Bo.rgb(n)).r,n.g,n.b):st(+n,+t,+r)};var Fa=18,Oa=.95047,Ia=1,Ya=1.08883,Za=lt.prototype=new rt;Za.brighter=function(n){return st(Math.min(100,this.l+Fa*(arguments.length?n:1)),this.a,this.b)},Za.darker=function(n){return st(Math.max(0,this.l-Fa*(arguments.length?n:1)),this.a,this.b)},Za.rgb=function(){return ft(this.l,this.a,this.b)},Bo.rgb=function(n,t,r){return 1===arguments.length?n instanceof xt?yt(n.r,n.g,n.b):_t(""+n,yt,it):yt(~~n,~~t,~~r)};var Va=xt.prototype=new rt;Va.brighter=function(n){n=Math.pow(.7,arguments.length?n:1);var t=this.r,r=this.g,e=this.b,u=30;return t||r||e?(t&&u>t&&(t=u),r&&u>r&&(r=u),e&&u>e&&(e=u),yt(Math.min(255,~~(t/n)),Math.min(255,~~(r/n)),Math.min(255,~~(e/n)))):yt(u,u,u)},Va.darker=function(n){return n=Math.pow(.7,arguments.length?n:1),yt(~~(n*this.r),~~(n*this.g),~~(n*this.b))},Va.hsl=function(){return bt(this.r,this.g,this.b)},Va.toString=function(){return"#"+Mt(this.r)+Mt(this.g)+Mt(this.b)};var $a=Bo.map({aliceblue:15792383,antiquewhite:16444375,aqua:65535,aquamarine:8388564,azure:15794175,beige:16119260,bisque:16770244,black:0,blanchedalmond:16772045,blue:255,blueviolet:9055202,brown:10824234,burlywood:14596231,cadetblue:6266528,chartreuse:8388352,chocolate:13789470,coral:16744272,cornflowerblue:6591981,cornsilk:16775388,crimson:14423100,cyan:65535,darkblue:139,darkcyan:35723,darkgoldenrod:12092939,darkgray:11119017,darkgreen:25600,darkgrey:11119017,darkkhaki:12433259,darkmagenta:9109643,darkolivegreen:5597999,darkorange:16747520,darkorchid:10040012,darkred:9109504,darksalmon:15308410,darkseagreen:9419919,darkslateblue:4734347,darkslategray:3100495,darkslategrey:3100495,darkturquoise:52945,darkviolet:9699539,deeppink:16716947,deepskyblue:49151,dimgray:6908265,dimgrey:6908265,dodgerblue:2003199,firebrick:11674146,floralwhite:16775920,forestgreen:2263842,fuchsia:16711935,gainsboro:14474460,ghostwhite:16316671,gold:16766720,goldenrod:14329120,gray:8421504,green:32768,greenyellow:11403055,grey:8421504,honeydew:15794160,hotpink:16738740,indianred:13458524,indigo:4915330,ivory:16777200,khaki:15787660,lavender:15132410,lavenderblush:16773365,lawngreen:8190976,lemonchiffon:16775885,lightblue:11393254,lightcoral:15761536,lightcyan:14745599,lightgoldenrodyellow:16448210,lightgray:13882323,lightgreen:9498256,lightgrey:13882323,lightpink:16758465,lightsalmon:16752762,lightseagreen:2142890,lightskyblue:8900346,lightslategray:7833753,lightslategrey:7833753,lightsteelblue:11584734,lightyellow:16777184,lime:65280,limegreen:3329330,linen:16445670,magenta:16711935,maroon:8388608,mediumaquamarine:6737322,mediumblue:205,mediumorchid:12211667,mediumpurple:9662683,mediumseagreen:3978097,mediumslateblue:8087790,mediumspringgreen:64154,mediumturquoise:4772300,mediumvioletred:13047173,midnightblue:1644912,mintcream:16121850,mistyrose:16770273,moccasin:16770229,navajowhite:16768685,navy:128,oldlace:16643558,olive:8421376,olivedrab:7048739,orange:16753920,orangered:16729344,orchid:14315734,palegoldenrod:15657130,palegreen:10025880,paleturquoise:11529966,palevioletred:14381203,papayawhip:16773077,peachpuff:16767673,peru:13468991,pink:16761035,plum:14524637,powderblue:11591910,purple:8388736,red:16711680,rosybrown:12357519,royalblue:4286945,saddlebrown:9127187,salmon:16416882,sandybrown:16032864,seagreen:3050327,seashell:16774638,sienna:10506797,silver:12632256,skyblue:8900331,slateblue:6970061,slategray:7372944,slategrey:7372944,snow:16775930,springgreen:65407,steelblue:4620980,tan:13808780,teal:32896,thistle:14204888,tomato:16737095,turquoise:4251856,violet:15631086,wheat:16113331,white:16777215,whitesmoke:16119285,yellow:16776960,yellowgreen:10145074});$a.forEach(function(n,t){$a.set(n,dt(t))}),Bo.functor=Et,Bo.xhr=Ct(At),Bo.dsv=function(n,t){function r(n,r,i){arguments.length<3&&(i=r,r=null);var o=Nt(n,t,null==r?e:u(r),i);return o.row=function(n){return arguments.length?o.response(null==(r=n)?e:u(n)):r},o}function e(n){return r.parse(n.responseText)}function u(n){return function(t){return r.parse(t.responseText,n)}}function i(t){return t.map(o).join(n)}function o(n){return a.test(n)?'"'+n.replace(/\"/g,'""')+'"':n}var a=new RegExp('["'+n+"\n]"),c=n.charCodeAt(0);return r.parse=function(n,t){var e;return r.parseRows(n,function(n,r){if(e)return e(n,r-1);var u=new Function("d","return {"+n.map(function(n,t){return JSON.stringify(n)+": d["+t+"]"}).join(",")+"}");e=t?function(n,r){return t(u(n),r)}:u})},r.parseRows=function(n,t){function r(){if(l>=s)return o;if(u)return u=!1,i;var t=l;if(34===n.charCodeAt(t)){for(var r=t;r++l;){var e=n.charCodeAt(l++),a=1;if(10===e)u=!0;else if(13===e)u=!0,10===n.charCodeAt(l)&&(++l,++a);else if(e!==c)continue;return n.substring(t,l-a)}return n.substring(t)}for(var e,u,i={},o={},a=[],s=n.length,l=0,f=0;(e=r())!==o;){for(var h=[];e!==i&&e!==o;)h.push(e),e=r();(!t||(h=t(h,f++)))&&a.push(h)}return a},r.format=function(t){if(Array.isArray(t[0]))return r.formatRows(t);var e=new h,u=[];return t.forEach(function(n){for(var t in n)e.has(t)||u.push(e.add(t))}),[u.map(o).join(n)].concat(t.map(function(t){return u.map(function(n){return o(t[n])}).join(n)})).join("\n")},r.formatRows=function(n){return n.map(i).join("\n")},r},Bo.csv=Bo.dsv(",","text/csv"),Bo.tsv=Bo.dsv(" ","text/tab-separated-values"),Bo.touch=function(n,t,r){if(arguments.length<3&&(r=t,t=x().changedTouches),t)for(var e,u=0,i=t.length;i>u;++u)if((e=t[u]).identifier===r)return Z(n,e)};var Xa,Ba,Ja,Wa,Ga,Ka=Qo[p(Qo,"requestAnimationFrame")]||function(n){setTimeout(n,17)};Bo.timer=function(n,t,r){var e=arguments.length;2>e&&(t=0),3>e&&(r=Date.now());var u=r+t,i={c:n,t:u,f:!1,n:null};Ba?Ba.n=i:Xa=i,Ba=i,Ja||(Wa=clearTimeout(Wa),Ja=1,Ka(Lt))},Bo.timer.flush=function(){Tt(),qt()},Bo.round=function(n,t){return t?Math.round(n*(t=Math.pow(10,t)))/t:Math.round(n)};var Qa=["y","z","a","f","p","n","\xb5","m","","k","M","G","T","P","E","Z","Y"].map(Dt);Bo.formatPrefix=function(n,t){var r=0;return n&&(0>n&&(n*=-1),t&&(n=Bo.round(n,Rt(n,t))),r=1+Math.floor(1e-12+Math.log(n)/Math.LN10),r=Math.max(-24,Math.min(24,3*Math.floor((r-1)/3)))),Qa[8+r/3]};var nc=/(?:([^{])?([<>=^]))?([+\- ])?([$#])?(0)?(\d+)?(,)?(\.-?\d+)?([a-z%])?/i,tc=Bo.map({b:function(n){return n.toString(2)},c:function(n){return String.fromCharCode(n)},o:function(n){return n.toString(8)},x:function(n){return n.toString(16)},X:function(n){return n.toString(16).toUpperCase()},g:function(n,t){return n.toPrecision(t)},e:function(n,t){return n.toExponential(t)},f:function(n,t){return n.toFixed(t)},r:function(n,t){return(n=Bo.round(n,Rt(n,t))).toFixed(Math.max(0,Math.min(20,Rt(n*(1+1e-15),t))))}}),rc=Bo.time={},ec=Date;jt.prototype={getDate:function(){return this._.getUTCDate()},getDay:function(){return this._.getUTCDay()},getFullYear:function(){return this._.getUTCFullYear()},getHours:function(){return this._.getUTCHours()},getMilliseconds:function(){return this._.getUTCMilliseconds()},getMinutes:function(){return this._.getUTCMinutes()},getMonth:function(){return this._.getUTCMonth()},getSeconds:function(){return this._.getUTCSeconds()},getTime:function(){return this._.getTime()},getTimezoneOffset:function(){return 0},valueOf:function(){return this._.valueOf()},setDate:function(){uc.setUTCDate.apply(this._,arguments)},setDay:function(){uc.setUTCDay.apply(this._,arguments)},setFullYear:function(){uc.setUTCFullYear.apply(this._,arguments)},setHours:function(){uc.setUTCHours.apply(this._,arguments)},setMilliseconds:function(){uc.setUTCMilliseconds.apply(this._,arguments)},setMinutes:function(){uc.setUTCMinutes.apply(this._,arguments)},setMonth:function(){uc.setUTCMonth.apply(this._,arguments)},setSeconds:function(){uc.setUTCSeconds.apply(this._,arguments)},setTime:function(){uc.setTime.apply(this._,arguments)}};var uc=Date.prototype;rc.year=Ht(function(n){return n=rc.day(n),n.setMonth(0,1),n},function(n,t){n.setFullYear(n.getFullYear()+t)},function(n){return n.getFullYear()}),rc.years=rc.year.range,rc.years.utc=rc.year.utc.range,rc.day=Ht(function(n){var t=new ec(2e3,0);return t.setFullYear(n.getFullYear(),n.getMonth(),n.getDate()),t},function(n,t){n.setDate(n.getDate()+t)},function(n){return n.getDate()-1}),rc.days=rc.day.range,rc.days.utc=rc.day.utc.range,rc.dayOfYear=function(n){var t=rc.year(n);return Math.floor((n-t-6e4*(n.getTimezoneOffset()-t.getTimezoneOffset()))/864e5)},["sunday","monday","tuesday","wednesday","thursday","friday","saturday"].forEach(function(n,t){t=7-t;var r=rc[n]=Ht(function(n){return(n=rc.day(n)).setDate(n.getDate()-(n.getDay()+t)%7),n},function(n,t){n.setDate(n.getDate()+7*Math.floor(t))},function(n){var r=rc.year(n).getDay();return Math.floor((rc.dayOfYear(n)+(r+t)%7)/7)-(r!==t)});rc[n+"s"]=r.range,rc[n+"s"].utc=r.utc.range,rc[n+"OfYear"]=function(n){var r=rc.year(n).getDay();return Math.floor((rc.dayOfYear(n)+(r+t)%7)/7)}}),rc.week=rc.sunday,rc.weeks=rc.sunday.range,rc.weeks.utc=rc.sunday.utc.range,rc.weekOfYear=rc.sundayOfYear;var ic={"-":"",_:" ",0:"0"},oc=/^\s*\d+/,ac=/^%/;Bo.locale=function(n){return{numberFormat:Pt(n),timeFormat:Ot(n)}};var cc=Bo.locale({decimal:".",thousands:",",grouping:[3],currency:["$",""],dateTime:"%a %b %e %X %Y",date:"%m/%d/%Y",time:"%H:%M:%S",periods:["AM","PM"],days:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],shortDays:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],months:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],shortMonths:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"]});Bo.format=cc.numberFormat,Bo.geo={},cr.prototype={s:0,t:0,add:function(n){sr(n,this.t,sc),sr(sc.s,this.s,this),this.s?this.t+=sc.t:this.s=sc.t},reset:function(){this.s=this.t=0},valueOf:function(){return this.s}};var sc=new cr;Bo.geo.stream=function(n,t){n&&lc.hasOwnProperty(n.type)?lc[n.type](n,t):lr(n,t)};var lc={Feature:function(n,t){lr(n.geometry,t)},FeatureCollection:function(n,t){for(var r=n.features,e=-1,u=r.length;++en?4*ka+n:n,pc.lineStart=pc.lineEnd=pc.point=v}};Bo.geo.bounds=function(){function n(n,t){x.push(M=[l=n,h=n]),f>t&&(f=t),t>g&&(g=t)}function t(t,r){var e=pr([t*za,r*za]);if(m){var u=dr(m,e),i=[u[1],-u[0],0],o=dr(i,u);xr(o),o=Mr(o);var c=t-p,s=c>0?1:-1,v=o[0]*La*s,d=ca(c)>180;if(d^(v>s*p&&s*t>v)){var y=o[1]*La;y>g&&(g=y)}else if(v=(v+360)%360-180,d^(v>s*p&&s*t>v)){var y=-o[1]*La;f>y&&(f=y)}else f>r&&(f=r),r>g&&(g=r);d?p>t?a(l,t)>a(l,h)&&(h=t):a(t,h)>a(l,h)&&(l=t):h>=l?(l>t&&(l=t),t>h&&(h=t)):t>p?a(l,t)>a(l,h)&&(h=t):a(t,h)>a(l,h)&&(l=t)}else n(t,r);m=e,p=t}function r(){_.point=t}function e(){M[0]=l,M[1]=h,_.point=n,m=null}function u(n,r){if(m){var e=n-p;y+=ca(e)>180?e+(e>0?360:-360):e}else v=n,d=r;pc.point(n,r),t(n,r)}function i(){pc.lineStart()}function o(){u(v,d),pc.lineEnd(),ca(y)>Ca&&(l=-(h=180)),M[0]=l,M[1]=h,m=null}function a(n,t){return(t-=n)<0?t+360:t}function c(n,t){return n[0]-t[0]}function s(n,t){return t[0]<=t[1]?t[0]<=n&&n<=t[1]:ngc?(l=-(h=180),f=-(g=90)):y>Ca?g=90:-Ca>y&&(f=-90),M[0]=l,M[1]=h}};return function(n){g=h=-(l=f=1/0),x=[],Bo.geo.stream(n,_);var t=x.length;if(t){x.sort(c);for(var r,e=1,u=x[0],i=[u];t>e;++e)r=x[e],s(r[0],u)||s(r[1],u)?(a(u[0],r[1])>a(u[0],u[1])&&(u[1]=r[1]),a(r[0],u[1])>a(u[0],u[1])&&(u[0]=r[0])):i.push(u=r);for(var o,r,p=-1/0,t=i.length-1,e=0,u=i[t];t>=e;u=r,++e)r=i[e],(o=a(u[1],r[0]))>p&&(p=o,l=r[0],h=u[1])}return x=M=null,1/0===l||1/0===f?[[0/0,0/0],[0/0,0/0]]:[[l,f],[h,g]] +}}(),Bo.geo.centroid=function(n){vc=dc=mc=yc=xc=Mc=_c=bc=wc=Sc=kc=0,Bo.geo.stream(n,Ec);var t=wc,r=Sc,e=kc,u=t*t+r*r+e*e;return Na>u&&(t=Mc,r=_c,e=bc,Ca>dc&&(t=mc,r=yc,e=xc),u=t*t+r*r+e*e,Na>u)?[0/0,0/0]:[Math.atan2(r,t)*La,G(e/Math.sqrt(u))*La]};var vc,dc,mc,yc,xc,Mc,_c,bc,wc,Sc,kc,Ec={sphere:v,point:br,lineStart:Sr,lineEnd:kr,polygonStart:function(){Ec.lineStart=Er},polygonEnd:function(){Ec.lineStart=Sr}},Ac=Lr(Ar,Pr,jr,[-ka,-ka/2]),Cc=1e9;Bo.geo.clipExtent=function(){var n,t,r,e,u,i,o={stream:function(n){return u&&(u.valid=!1),u=i(n),u.valid=!0,u},extent:function(a){return arguments.length?(i=Or(n=+a[0][0],t=+a[0][1],r=+a[1][0],e=+a[1][1]),u&&(u.valid=!1,u=null),o):[[n,t],[r,e]]}};return o.extent([[0,0],[960,500]])},(Bo.geo.conicEqualArea=function(){return Yr(Zr)}).raw=Zr,Bo.geo.albers=function(){return Bo.geo.conicEqualArea().rotate([96,0]).center([-.6,38.7]).parallels([29.5,45.5]).scale(1070)},Bo.geo.albersUsa=function(){function n(n){var i=n[0],o=n[1];return t=null,r(i,o),t||(e(i,o),t)||u(i,o),t}var t,r,e,u,i=Bo.geo.albers(),o=Bo.geo.conicEqualArea().rotate([154,0]).center([-2,58.5]).parallels([55,65]),a=Bo.geo.conicEqualArea().rotate([157,0]).center([-3,19.9]).parallels([8,18]),c={point:function(n,r){t=[n,r]}};return n.invert=function(n){var t=i.scale(),r=i.translate(),e=(n[0]-r[0])/t,u=(n[1]-r[1])/t;return(u>=.12&&.234>u&&e>=-.425&&-.214>e?o:u>=.166&&.234>u&&e>=-.214&&-.115>e?a:i).invert(n)},n.stream=function(n){var t=i.stream(n),r=o.stream(n),e=a.stream(n);return{point:function(n,u){t.point(n,u),r.point(n,u),e.point(n,u)},sphere:function(){t.sphere(),r.sphere(),e.sphere()},lineStart:function(){t.lineStart(),r.lineStart(),e.lineStart()},lineEnd:function(){t.lineEnd(),r.lineEnd(),e.lineEnd()},polygonStart:function(){t.polygonStart(),r.polygonStart(),e.polygonStart()},polygonEnd:function(){t.polygonEnd(),r.polygonEnd(),e.polygonEnd()}}},n.precision=function(t){return arguments.length?(i.precision(t),o.precision(t),a.precision(t),n):i.precision()},n.scale=function(t){return arguments.length?(i.scale(t),o.scale(.35*t),a.scale(t),n.translate(i.translate())):i.scale()},n.translate=function(t){if(!arguments.length)return i.translate();var s=i.scale(),l=+t[0],f=+t[1];return r=i.translate(t).clipExtent([[l-.455*s,f-.238*s],[l+.455*s,f+.238*s]]).stream(c).point,e=o.translate([l-.307*s,f+.201*s]).clipExtent([[l-.425*s+Ca,f+.12*s+Ca],[l-.214*s-Ca,f+.234*s-Ca]]).stream(c).point,u=a.translate([l-.205*s,f+.212*s]).clipExtent([[l-.214*s+Ca,f+.166*s+Ca],[l-.115*s-Ca,f+.234*s-Ca]]).stream(c).point,n},n.scale(1070)};var Nc,zc,Lc,Tc,qc,Rc,Dc={point:v,lineStart:v,lineEnd:v,polygonStart:function(){zc=0,Dc.lineStart=Vr},polygonEnd:function(){Dc.lineStart=Dc.lineEnd=Dc.point=v,Nc+=ca(zc/2)}},Pc={point:$r,lineStart:v,lineEnd:v,polygonStart:v,polygonEnd:v},Uc={point:Jr,lineStart:Wr,lineEnd:Gr,polygonStart:function(){Uc.lineStart=Kr},polygonEnd:function(){Uc.point=Jr,Uc.lineStart=Wr,Uc.lineEnd=Gr}};Bo.geo.path=function(){function n(n){return n&&("function"==typeof a&&i.pointRadius(+a.apply(this,arguments)),o&&o.valid||(o=u(i)),Bo.geo.stream(n,o)),i.result()}function t(){return o=null,n}var r,e,u,i,o,a=4.5;return n.area=function(n){return Nc=0,Bo.geo.stream(n,u(Dc)),Nc},n.centroid=function(n){return mc=yc=xc=Mc=_c=bc=wc=Sc=kc=0,Bo.geo.stream(n,u(Uc)),kc?[wc/kc,Sc/kc]:bc?[Mc/bc,_c/bc]:xc?[mc/xc,yc/xc]:[0/0,0/0]},n.bounds=function(n){return qc=Rc=-(Lc=Tc=1/0),Bo.geo.stream(n,u(Pc)),[[Lc,Tc],[qc,Rc]]},n.projection=function(n){return arguments.length?(u=(r=n)?n.stream||te(n):At,t()):r},n.context=function(n){return arguments.length?(i=null==(e=n)?new Xr:new Qr(n),"function"!=typeof a&&i.pointRadius(a),t()):e},n.pointRadius=function(t){return arguments.length?(a="function"==typeof t?t:(i.pointRadius(+t),+t),n):a},n.projection(Bo.geo.albersUsa()).context(null)},Bo.geo.transform=function(n){return{stream:function(t){var r=new re(t);for(var e in n)r[e]=n[e];return r}}},re.prototype={point:function(n,t){this.stream.point(n,t)},sphere:function(){this.stream.sphere()},lineStart:function(){this.stream.lineStart()},lineEnd:function(){this.stream.lineEnd()},polygonStart:function(){this.stream.polygonStart()},polygonEnd:function(){this.stream.polygonEnd()}},Bo.geo.projection=ue,Bo.geo.projectionMutator=ie,(Bo.geo.equirectangular=function(){return ue(ae)}).raw=ae.invert=ae,Bo.geo.rotation=function(n){function t(t){return t=n(t[0]*za,t[1]*za),t[0]*=La,t[1]*=La,t}return n=se(n[0]%360*za,n[1]*za,n.length>2?n[2]*za:0),t.invert=function(t){return t=n.invert(t[0]*za,t[1]*za),t[0]*=La,t[1]*=La,t},t},ce.invert=ae,Bo.geo.circle=function(){function n(){var n="function"==typeof e?e.apply(this,arguments):e,t=se(-n[0]*za,-n[1]*za,0).invert,u=[];return r(null,null,1,{point:function(n,r){u.push(n=t(n,r)),n[0]*=La,n[1]*=La}}),{type:"Polygon",coordinates:[u]}}var t,r,e=[0,0],u=6;return n.origin=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=t,n):e},n.angle=function(e){return arguments.length?(r=ge((t=+e)*za,u*za),n):t},n.precision=function(e){return arguments.length?(r=ge(t*za,(u=+e)*za),n):u},n.angle(90)},Bo.geo.distance=function(n,t){var r,e=(t[0]-n[0])*za,u=n[1]*za,i=t[1]*za,o=Math.sin(e),a=Math.cos(e),c=Math.sin(u),s=Math.cos(u),l=Math.sin(i),f=Math.cos(i);return Math.atan2(Math.sqrt((r=f*o)*r+(r=s*l-c*f*a)*r),c*l+s*f*a)},Bo.geo.graticule=function(){function n(){return{type:"MultiLineString",coordinates:t()}}function t(){return Bo.range(Math.ceil(i/d)*d,u,d).map(h).concat(Bo.range(Math.ceil(s/m)*m,c,m).map(g)).concat(Bo.range(Math.ceil(e/p)*p,r,p).filter(function(n){return ca(n%d)>Ca}).map(l)).concat(Bo.range(Math.ceil(a/v)*v,o,v).filter(function(n){return ca(n%m)>Ca}).map(f))}var r,e,u,i,o,a,c,s,l,f,h,g,p=10,v=p,d=90,m=360,y=2.5;return n.lines=function(){return t().map(function(n){return{type:"LineString",coordinates:n}})},n.outline=function(){return{type:"Polygon",coordinates:[h(i).concat(g(c).slice(1),h(u).reverse().slice(1),g(s).reverse().slice(1))]}},n.extent=function(t){return arguments.length?n.majorExtent(t).minorExtent(t):n.minorExtent()},n.majorExtent=function(t){return arguments.length?(i=+t[0][0],u=+t[1][0],s=+t[0][1],c=+t[1][1],i>u&&(t=i,i=u,u=t),s>c&&(t=s,s=c,c=t),n.precision(y)):[[i,s],[u,c]]},n.minorExtent=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=+t[0][0],r=+t[1][0],a=+t[0][1],o=+t[1][1],e>r&&(t=e,e=r,r=t),a>o&&(t=a,a=o,o=t),n.precision(y)):[[e,a],[r,o]]},n.step=function(t){return arguments.length?n.majorStep(t).minorStep(t):n.minorStep()},n.majorStep=function(t){return arguments.length?(d=+t[0],m=+t[1],n):[d,m]},n.minorStep=function(t){return arguments.length?(p=+t[0],v=+t[1],n):[p,v]},n.precision=function(t){return arguments.length?(y=+t,l=ve(a,o,90),f=de(e,r,y),h=ve(s,c,90),g=de(i,u,y),n):y},n.majorExtent([[-180,-90+Ca],[180,90-Ca]]).minorExtent([[-180,-80-Ca],[180,80+Ca]])},Bo.geo.greatArc=function(){function n(){return{type:"LineString",coordinates:[t||e.apply(this,arguments),r||u.apply(this,arguments)]}}var t,r,e=me,u=ye;return n.distance=function(){return Bo.geo.distance(t||e.apply(this,arguments),r||u.apply(this,arguments))},n.source=function(r){return arguments.length?(e=r,t="function"==typeof r?null:r,n):e},n.target=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=t,r="function"==typeof t?null:t,n):u},n.precision=function(){return arguments.length?n:0},n},Bo.geo.interpolate=function(n,t){return xe(n[0]*za,n[1]*za,t[0]*za,t[1]*za)},Bo.geo.length=function(n){return jc=0,Bo.geo.stream(n,Hc),jc};var jc,Hc={sphere:v,point:v,lineStart:Me,lineEnd:v,polygonStart:v,polygonEnd:v},Fc=_e(function(n){return Math.sqrt(2/(1+n))},function(n){return 2*Math.asin(n/2)});(Bo.geo.azimuthalEqualArea=function(){return ue(Fc)}).raw=Fc;var Oc=_e(function(n){var t=Math.acos(n);return t&&t/Math.sin(t)},At);(Bo.geo.azimuthalEquidistant=function(){return ue(Oc)}).raw=Oc,(Bo.geo.conicConformal=function(){return Yr(be)}).raw=be,(Bo.geo.conicEquidistant=function(){return Yr(we)}).raw=we;var Ic=_e(function(n){return 1/n},Math.atan);(Bo.geo.gnomonic=function(){return ue(Ic)}).raw=Ic,Se.invert=function(n,t){return[n,2*Math.atan(Math.exp(t))-Aa]},(Bo.geo.mercator=function(){return ke(Se)}).raw=Se;var Yc=_e(function(){return 1},Math.asin);(Bo.geo.orthographic=function(){return ue(Yc)}).raw=Yc;var Zc=_e(function(n){return 1/(1+n)},function(n){return 2*Math.atan(n)});(Bo.geo.stereographic=function(){return ue(Zc)}).raw=Zc,Ee.invert=function(n,t){return[-t,2*Math.atan(Math.exp(n))-Aa]},(Bo.geo.transverseMercator=function(){var n=ke(Ee),t=n.center,r=n.rotate;return n.center=function(n){return n?t([-n[1],n[0]]):(n=t(),[-n[1],n[0]])},n.rotate=function(n){return n?r([n[0],n[1],n.length>2?n[2]+90:90]):(n=r(),[n[0],n[1],n[2]-90])},n.rotate([0,0])}).raw=Ee,Bo.geom={},Bo.geom.hull=function(n){function t(n){if(n.length<3)return[];var t,u=Et(r),i=Et(e),o=n.length,a=[],c=[];for(t=0;o>t;t++)a.push([+u.call(this,n[t],t),+i.call(this,n[t],t),t]);for(a.sort(ze),t=0;o>t;t++)c.push([a[t][0],-a[t][1]]);var s=Ne(a),l=Ne(c),f=l[0]===s[0],h=l[l.length-1]===s[s.length-1],g=[];for(t=s.length-1;t>=0;--t)g.push(n[a[s[t]][2]]);for(t=+f;t=e&&s.x<=i&&s.y>=u&&s.y<=o?[[e,o],[i,o],[i,u],[e,u]]:[];l.point=n[a]}),t}function r(n){return n.map(function(n,t){return{x:Math.round(i(n,t)/Ca)*Ca,y:Math.round(o(n,t)/Ca)*Ca,i:t}})}var e=Ae,u=Ce,i=e,o=u,a=Qc;return n?t(n):(t.links=function(n){return iu(r(n)).edges.filter(function(n){return n.l&&n.r}).map(function(t){return{source:n[t.l.i],target:n[t.r.i]}})},t.triangles=function(n){var t=[];return iu(r(n)).cells.forEach(function(r,e){for(var u,i,o=r.site,a=r.edges.sort(Ye),c=-1,s=a.length,l=a[s-1].edge,f=l.l===o?l.r:l.l;++c=s,h=e>=l,g=(h<<1)+f;n.leaf=!1,n=n.nodes[g]||(n.nodes[g]=lu()),f?u=s:a=s,h?o=l:c=l,i(n,t,r,e,u,o,a,c)}var l,f,h,g,p,v,d,m,y,x=Et(a),M=Et(c);if(null!=t)v=t,d=r,m=e,y=u;else if(m=y=-(v=d=1/0),f=[],h=[],p=n.length,o)for(g=0;p>g;++g)l=n[g],l.xm&&(m=l.x),l.y>y&&(y=l.y),f.push(l.x),h.push(l.y);else for(g=0;p>g;++g){var _=+x(l=n[g],g),b=+M(l,g);v>_&&(v=_),d>b&&(d=b),_>m&&(m=_),b>y&&(y=b),f.push(_),h.push(b)}var w=m-v,S=y-d;w>S?y=d+w:m=v+S;var k=lu();if(k.add=function(n){i(k,n,+x(n,++g),+M(n,g),v,d,m,y)},k.visit=function(n){fu(n,k,v,d,m,y)},g=-1,null==t){for(;++g=0?n.substring(0,t):n,e=t>=0?n.substring(t+1):"in";return r=es.get(r)||rs,e=us.get(e)||At,yu(e(r.apply(null,Jo.call(arguments,1))))},Bo.interpolateHcl=Lu,Bo.interpolateHsl=Tu,Bo.interpolateLab=qu,Bo.interpolateRound=Ru,Bo.transform=function(n){var t=Go.createElementNS(Bo.ns.prefix.svg,"g");return(Bo.transform=function(n){if(null!=n){t.setAttribute("transform",n);var r=t.transform.baseVal.consolidate()}return new Du(r?r.matrix:is)})(n)},Du.prototype.toString=function(){return"translate("+this.translate+")rotate("+this.rotate+")skewX("+this.skew+")scale("+this.scale+")"};var is={a:1,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:0,f:0};Bo.interpolateTransform=Hu,Bo.layout={},Bo.layout.bundle=function(){return function(n){for(var t=[],r=-1,e=n.length;++ra*a/d){if(p>c){var s=t.charge/c;n.px-=i*s,n.py-=o*s}return!0}if(t.point&&c&&p>c){var s=t.pointCharge/c;n.px-=i*s,n.py-=o*s}}return!t.charge}}function t(n){n.px=Bo.event.x,n.py=Bo.event.y,a.resume()}var r,e,u,i,o,a={},c=Bo.dispatch("start","tick","end"),s=[1,1],l=.9,f=os,h=as,g=-30,p=cs,v=.1,d=.64,m=[],y=[];return a.tick=function(){if((e*=.99)<.005)return c.end({type:"end",alpha:e=0}),!0;var t,r,a,f,h,p,d,x,M,_=m.length,b=y.length;for(r=0;b>r;++r)a=y[r],f=a.source,h=a.target,x=h.x-f.x,M=h.y-f.y,(p=x*x+M*M)&&(p=e*i[r]*((p=Math.sqrt(p))-u[r])/p,x*=p,M*=p,h.x-=x*(d=f.weight/(h.weight+f.weight)),h.y-=M*d,f.x+=x*(d=1-d),f.y+=M*d);if((d=e*v)&&(x=s[0]/2,M=s[1]/2,r=-1,d))for(;++r<_;)a=m[r],a.x+=(x-a.x)*d,a.y+=(M-a.y)*d;if(g)for(Ju(t=Bo.geom.quadtree(m),e,o),r=-1;++r<_;)(a=m[r]).fixed||t.visit(n(a));for(r=-1;++r<_;)a=m[r],a.fixed?(a.x=a.px,a.y=a.py):(a.x-=(a.px-(a.px=a.x))*l,a.y-=(a.py-(a.py=a.y))*l);c.tick({type:"tick",alpha:e})},a.nodes=function(n){return arguments.length?(m=n,a):m},a.links=function(n){return arguments.length?(y=n,a):y},a.size=function(n){return arguments.length?(s=n,a):s},a.linkDistance=function(n){return arguments.length?(f="function"==typeof n?n:+n,a):f},a.distance=a.linkDistance,a.linkStrength=function(n){return arguments.length?(h="function"==typeof n?n:+n,a):h},a.friction=function(n){return arguments.length?(l=+n,a):l},a.charge=function(n){return arguments.length?(g="function"==typeof n?n:+n,a):g},a.chargeDistance=function(n){return arguments.length?(p=n*n,a):Math.sqrt(p)},a.gravity=function(n){return arguments.length?(v=+n,a):v},a.theta=function(n){return arguments.length?(d=n*n,a):Math.sqrt(d)},a.alpha=function(n){return arguments.length?(n=+n,e?e=n>0?n:0:n>0&&(c.start({type:"start",alpha:e=n}),Bo.timer(a.tick)),a):e},a.start=function(){function n(n,e){if(!r){for(r=new Array(c),a=0;c>a;++a)r[a]=[];for(a=0;s>a;++a){var u=y[a];r[u.source.index].push(u.target),r[u.target.index].push(u.source)}}for(var i,o=r[t],a=-1,s=o.length;++at;++t)(e=m[t]).index=t,e.weight=0;for(t=0;l>t;++t)e=y[t],"number"==typeof e.source&&(e.source=m[e.source]),"number"==typeof e.target&&(e.target=m[e.target]),++e.source.weight,++e.target.weight;for(t=0;c>t;++t)e=m[t],isNaN(e.x)&&(e.x=n("x",p)),isNaN(e.y)&&(e.y=n("y",v)),isNaN(e.px)&&(e.px=e.x),isNaN(e.py)&&(e.py=e.y);if(u=[],"function"==typeof f)for(t=0;l>t;++t)u[t]=+f.call(this,y[t],t);else for(t=0;l>t;++t)u[t]=f;if(i=[],"function"==typeof h)for(t=0;l>t;++t)i[t]=+h.call(this,y[t],t);else for(t=0;l>t;++t)i[t]=h;if(o=[],"function"==typeof g)for(t=0;c>t;++t)o[t]=+g.call(this,m[t],t);else for(t=0;c>t;++t)o[t]=g;return a.resume()},a.resume=function(){return a.alpha(.1)},a.stop=function(){return a.alpha(0)},a.drag=function(){return r||(r=Bo.behavior.drag().origin(At).on("dragstart.force",Vu).on("drag.force",t).on("dragend.force",$u)),arguments.length?(this.on("mouseover.force",Xu).on("mouseout.force",Bu).call(r),void 0):r},Bo.rebind(a,c,"on")};var os=20,as=1,cs=1/0;Bo.layout.hierarchy=function(){function n(u){var i,o=[u],a=[];for(u.depth=0;null!=(i=o.pop());)if(a.push(i),(s=r.call(n,i,i.depth))&&(c=s.length)){for(var c,s,l;--c>=0;)o.push(l=s[c]),l.parent=i,l.depth=i.depth+1;e&&(i.value=0),i.children=s}else e&&(i.value=+e.call(n,i,i.depth)||0),delete i.children;return Ku(u,function(n){var r,u;t&&(r=n.children)&&r.sort(t),e&&(u=n.parent)&&(u.value+=n.value)}),a}var t=ti,r=Qu,e=ni;return n.sort=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=r,n):t},n.children=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=t,n):r},n.value=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=t,n):e},n.revalue=function(t){return e&&(Gu(t,function(n){n.children&&(n.value=0)}),Ku(t,function(t){var r;t.children||(t.value=+e.call(n,t,t.depth)||0),(r=t.parent)&&(r.value+=t.value)})),t},n},Bo.layout.partition=function(){function n(t,r,e,u){var i=t.children;if(t.x=r,t.y=t.depth*u,t.dx=e,t.dy=u,i&&(o=i.length)){var o,a,c,s=-1;for(e=t.value?e/t.value:0;++sg;++g)for(u.call(n,s[0][g],p=v[g],l[0][g][1]),h=1;d>h;++h)u.call(n,s[h][g],p+=l[h-1][g][1],l[h][g][1]);return a}var t=At,r=oi,e=ai,u=ii,i=ei,o=ui;return n.values=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=r,n):t},n.order=function(t){return arguments.length?(r="function"==typeof t?t:ls.get(t)||oi,n):r},n.offset=function(t){return arguments.length?(e="function"==typeof t?t:fs.get(t)||ai,n):e},n.x=function(t){return arguments.length?(i=t,n):i},n.y=function(t){return arguments.length?(o=t,n):o},n.out=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=t,n):u},n};var ls=Bo.map({"inside-out":function(n){var t,r,e=n.length,u=n.map(ci),i=n.map(si),o=Bo.range(e).sort(function(n,t){return u[n]-u[t]}),a=0,c=0,s=[],l=[];for(t=0;e>t;++t)r=o[t],c>a?(a+=i[r],s.push(r)):(c+=i[r],l.push(r));return l.reverse().concat(s)},reverse:function(n){return Bo.range(n.length).reverse()},"default":oi}),fs=Bo.map({silhouette:function(n){var t,r,e,u=n.length,i=n[0].length,o=[],a=0,c=[];for(r=0;i>r;++r){for(t=0,e=0;u>t;t++)e+=n[t][r][1];e>a&&(a=e),o.push(e)}for(r=0;i>r;++r)c[r]=(a-o[r])/2;return c},wiggle:function(n){var t,r,e,u,i,o,a,c,s,l=n.length,f=n[0],h=f.length,g=[];for(g[0]=c=s=0,r=1;h>r;++r){for(t=0,u=0;l>t;++t)u+=n[t][r][1];for(t=0,i=0,a=f[r][0]-f[r-1][0];l>t;++t){for(e=0,o=(n[t][r][1]-n[t][r-1][1])/(2*a);t>e;++e)o+=(n[e][r][1]-n[e][r-1][1])/a;i+=o*n[t][r][1]}g[r]=c-=u?i/u*a:0,s>c&&(s=c)}for(r=0;h>r;++r)g[r]-=s;return g},expand:function(n){var t,r,e,u=n.length,i=n[0].length,o=1/u,a=[];for(r=0;i>r;++r){for(t=0,e=0;u>t;t++)e+=n[t][r][1];if(e)for(t=0;u>t;t++)n[t][r][1]/=e;else for(t=0;u>t;t++)n[t][r][1]=o}for(r=0;i>r;++r)a[r]=0;return a},zero:ai});Bo.layout.histogram=function(){function n(n,i){for(var o,a,c=[],s=n.map(r,this),l=e.call(this,s,i),f=u.call(this,l,s,i),i=-1,h=s.length,g=f.length-1,p=t?1:1/h;++i0)for(i=-1;++i=l[0]&&a<=l[1]&&(o=c[Bo.bisect(f,a,1,g)-1],o.y+=p,o.push(n[i]));return c}var t=!0,r=Number,e=gi,u=fi;return n.value=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=t,n):r},n.range=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=Et(t),n):e},n.bins=function(t){return arguments.length?(u="number"==typeof t?function(n){return hi(n,t)}:Et(t),n):u},n.frequency=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=!!r,n):t},n},Bo.layout.pack=function(){function n(n,i){var o=r.call(this,n,i),a=o[0],c=u[0],s=u[1],l=null==t?Math.sqrt:"function"==typeof t?t:function(){return t};if(a.x=a.y=0,Ku(a,function(n){n.r=+l(n.value)}),Ku(a,yi),e){var f=e*(t?1:Math.max(2*a.r/c,2*a.r/s))/2;Ku(a,function(n){n.r+=f}),Ku(a,yi),Ku(a,function(n){n.r-=f})}return _i(a,c/2,s/2,t?1:1/Math.max(2*a.r/c,2*a.r/s)),o}var t,r=Bo.layout.hierarchy().sort(pi),e=0,u=[1,1];return n.size=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=t,n):u},n.radius=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=null==r||"function"==typeof r?r:+r,n):t},n.padding=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=+t,n):e},Wu(n,r)},Bo.layout.tree=function(){function n(n,u){var l=o.call(this,n,u),f=l[0],h=t(f);if(Ku(h,r),h.parent.m=-h.z,Gu(h,e),s)Gu(f,i);else{var g=f,p=f,v=f;Gu(f,function(n){n.xp.x&&(p=n),n.depth>v.depth&&(v=n)});var d=a(g,p)/2-g.x,m=c[0]/(p.x+a(p,g)/2+d),y=c[1]/(v.depth||1);Gu(f,function(n){n.x=(n.x+d)*m,n.y=n.depth*y})}return l}function t(n){for(var t,r={A:null,children:[n]},e=[r];null!=(t=e.pop());)for(var u,i=t.children,o=0,a=i.length;a>o;++o)e.push((i[o]=u={_:i[o],parent:t,children:(u=i[o].children)&&u.slice()||[],A:null,a:null,z:0,m:0,c:0,s:0,t:null,i:o}).a=u);return r.children[0]}function r(n){var t=n.children,r=n.parent.children,e=n.i?r[n.i-1]:null;if(t.length){Ai(n);var i=(t[0].z+t[t.length-1].z)/2;e?(n.z=e.z+a(n._,e._),n.m=n.z-i):n.z=i}else e&&(n.z=e.z+a(n._,e._));n.parent.A=u(n,e,n.parent.A||r[0])}function e(n){n._.x=n.z+n.parent.m,n.m+=n.parent.m}function u(n,t,r){if(t){for(var e,u=n,i=n,o=t,c=u.parent.children[0],s=u.m,l=i.m,f=o.m,h=c.m;o=ki(o),u=Si(u),o&&u;)c=Si(c),i=ki(i),i.a=n,e=o.z+f-u.z-s+a(o._,u._),e>0&&(Ei(Ci(o,n,r),n,e),s+=e,l+=e),f+=o.m,s+=u.m,h+=c.m,l+=i.m;o&&!ki(i)&&(i.t=o,i.m+=f-l),u&&!Si(c)&&(c.t=u,c.m+=s-h,r=n)}return r}function i(n){n.x*=c[0],n.y=n.depth*c[1]}var o=Bo.layout.hierarchy().sort(null).value(null),a=wi,c=[1,1],s=null;return n.separation=function(t){return arguments.length?(a=t,n):a},n.size=function(t){return arguments.length?(s=null==(c=t)?i:null,n):s?null:c},n.nodeSize=function(t){return arguments.length?(s=null==(c=t)?null:i,n):s?c:null},Wu(n,o)},Bo.layout.cluster=function(){function n(n,i){var o,a=t.call(this,n,i),c=a[0],s=0;Ku(c,function(n){var t=n.children;t&&t.length?(n.x=zi(t),n.y=Ni(t)):(n.x=o?s+=r(n,o):0,n.y=0,o=n)});var l=Li(c),f=Ti(c),h=l.x-r(l,f)/2,g=f.x+r(f,l)/2;return Ku(c,u?function(n){n.x=(n.x-c.x)*e[0],n.y=(c.y-n.y)*e[1]}:function(n){n.x=(n.x-h)/(g-h)*e[0],n.y=(1-(c.y?n.y/c.y:1))*e[1]}),a}var t=Bo.layout.hierarchy().sort(null).value(null),r=wi,e=[1,1],u=!1;return n.separation=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=t,n):r},n.size=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=null==(e=t),n):u?null:e},n.nodeSize=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=null!=(e=t),n):u?e:null},Wu(n,t)},Bo.layout.treemap=function(){function n(n,t){for(var r,e,u=-1,i=n.length;++ut?0:t),r.area=isNaN(e)||0>=e?0:e}function t(r){var i=r.children;if(i&&i.length){var o,a,c,s=f(r),l=[],h=i.slice(),p=1/0,v="slice"===g?s.dx:"dice"===g?s.dy:"slice-dice"===g?1&r.depth?s.dy:s.dx:Math.min(s.dx,s.dy);for(n(h,s.dx*s.dy/r.value),l.area=0;(c=h.length)>0;)l.push(o=h[c-1]),l.area+=o.area,"squarify"!==g||(a=e(l,v))<=p?(h.pop(),p=a):(l.area-=l.pop().area,u(l,v,s,!1),v=Math.min(s.dx,s.dy),l.length=l.area=0,p=1/0);l.length&&(u(l,v,s,!0),l.length=l.area=0),i.forEach(t)}}function r(t){var e=t.children;if(e&&e.length){var i,o=f(t),a=e.slice(),c=[];for(n(a,o.dx*o.dy/t.value),c.area=0;i=a.pop();)c.push(i),c.area+=i.area,null!=i.z&&(u(c,i.z?o.dx:o.dy,o,!a.length),c.length=c.area=0);e.forEach(r)}}function e(n,t){for(var r,e=n.area,u=0,i=1/0,o=-1,a=n.length;++or&&(i=r),r>u&&(u=r));return e*=e,t*=t,e?Math.max(t*u*p/e,e/(t*i*p)):1/0}function u(n,t,r,e){var u,i=-1,o=n.length,a=r.x,s=r.y,l=t?c(n.area/t):0;if(t==r.dx){for((e||l>r.dy)&&(l=r.dy);++ir.dx)&&(l=r.dx);++ir&&(t=1),1>r&&(n=0),function(){var r,e,u;do r=2*Math.random()-1,e=2*Math.random()-1,u=r*r+e*e;while(!u||u>1);return n+t*r*Math.sqrt(-2*Math.log(u)/u)}},logNormal:function(){var n=Bo.random.normal.apply(Bo,arguments);return function(){return Math.exp(n())}},bates:function(n){var t=Bo.random.irwinHall(n);return function(){return t()/n}},irwinHall:function(n){return function(){for(var t=0,r=0;n>r;r++)t+=Math.random();return t}}},Bo.scale={};var hs={floor:At,ceil:At};Bo.scale.linear=function(){return Oi([0,1],[0,1],du,!1)};var gs={s:1,g:1,p:1,r:1,e:1};Bo.scale.log=function(){return Ji(Bo.scale.linear().domain([0,1]),10,!0,[1,10])};var ps=Bo.format(".0e"),vs={floor:function(n){return-Math.ceil(-n)},ceil:function(n){return-Math.floor(-n)}};Bo.scale.pow=function(){return Wi(Bo.scale.linear(),1,[0,1])},Bo.scale.sqrt=function(){return Bo.scale.pow().exponent(.5)},Bo.scale.ordinal=function(){return Ki([],{t:"range",a:[[]]})},Bo.scale.category10=function(){return Bo.scale.ordinal().range(ds)},Bo.scale.category20=function(){return Bo.scale.ordinal().range(ms)},Bo.scale.category20b=function(){return Bo.scale.ordinal().range(ys)},Bo.scale.category20c=function(){return Bo.scale.ordinal().range(xs)};var ds=[2062260,16744206,2924588,14034728,9725885,9197131,14907330,8355711,12369186,1556175].map(mt),ms=[2062260,11454440,16744206,16759672,2924588,10018698,14034728,16750742,9725885,12955861,9197131,12885140,14907330,16234194,8355711,13092807,12369186,14408589,1556175,10410725].map(mt),ys=[3750777,5395619,7040719,10264286,6519097,9216594,11915115,13556636,9202993,12426809,15186514,15190932,8666169,11356490,14049643,15177372,8077683,10834324,13528509,14589654].map(mt),xs=[3244733,7057110,10406625,13032431,15095053,16616764,16625259,16634018,3253076,7652470,10607003,13101504,7695281,10394312,12369372,14342891,6513507,9868950,12434877,14277081].map(mt);Bo.scale.quantile=function(){return Qi([],[])},Bo.scale.quantize=function(){return no(0,1,[0,1])},Bo.scale.threshold=function(){return to([.5],[0,1])},Bo.scale.identity=function(){return ro([0,1])},Bo.svg={},Bo.svg.arc=function(){function n(){var n=t.apply(this,arguments),i=r.apply(this,arguments),o=e.apply(this,arguments)+Ms,a=u.apply(this,arguments)+Ms,c=(o>a&&(c=o,o=a,a=c),a-o),s=ka>c?"0":"1",l=Math.cos(o),f=Math.sin(o),h=Math.cos(a),g=Math.sin(a); +return c>=_s?n?"M0,"+i+"A"+i+","+i+" 0 1,1 0,"+-i+"A"+i+","+i+" 0 1,1 0,"+i+"M0,"+n+"A"+n+","+n+" 0 1,0 0,"+-n+"A"+n+","+n+" 0 1,0 0,"+n+"Z":"M0,"+i+"A"+i+","+i+" 0 1,1 0,"+-i+"A"+i+","+i+" 0 1,1 0,"+i+"Z":n?"M"+i*l+","+i*f+"A"+i+","+i+" 0 "+s+",1 "+i*h+","+i*g+"L"+n*h+","+n*g+"A"+n+","+n+" 0 "+s+",0 "+n*l+","+n*f+"Z":"M"+i*l+","+i*f+"A"+i+","+i+" 0 "+s+",1 "+i*h+","+i*g+"L0,0"+"Z"}var t=eo,r=uo,e=io,u=oo;return n.innerRadius=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=Et(r),n):t},n.outerRadius=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=Et(t),n):r},n.startAngle=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=Et(t),n):e},n.endAngle=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=Et(t),n):u},n.centroid=function(){var n=(t.apply(this,arguments)+r.apply(this,arguments))/2,i=(e.apply(this,arguments)+u.apply(this,arguments))/2+Ms;return[Math.cos(i)*n,Math.sin(i)*n]},n};var Ms=-Aa,_s=Ea-Ca;Bo.svg.line=function(){return ao(At)};var bs=Bo.map({linear:co,"linear-closed":so,step:lo,"step-before":fo,"step-after":ho,basis:xo,"basis-open":Mo,"basis-closed":_o,bundle:bo,cardinal:vo,"cardinal-open":go,"cardinal-closed":po,monotone:Co});bs.forEach(function(n,t){t.key=n,t.closed=/-closed$/.test(n)});var ws=[0,2/3,1/3,0],Ss=[0,1/3,2/3,0],ks=[0,1/6,2/3,1/6];Bo.svg.line.radial=function(){var n=ao(No);return n.radius=n.x,delete n.x,n.angle=n.y,delete n.y,n},fo.reverse=ho,ho.reverse=fo,Bo.svg.area=function(){return zo(At)},Bo.svg.area.radial=function(){var n=zo(No);return n.radius=n.x,delete n.x,n.innerRadius=n.x0,delete n.x0,n.outerRadius=n.x1,delete n.x1,n.angle=n.y,delete n.y,n.startAngle=n.y0,delete n.y0,n.endAngle=n.y1,delete n.y1,n},Bo.svg.chord=function(){function n(n,a){var c=t(this,i,n,a),s=t(this,o,n,a);return"M"+c.p0+e(c.r,c.p1,c.a1-c.a0)+(r(c,s)?u(c.r,c.p1,c.r,c.p0):u(c.r,c.p1,s.r,s.p0)+e(s.r,s.p1,s.a1-s.a0)+u(s.r,s.p1,c.r,c.p0))+"Z"}function t(n,t,r,e){var u=t.call(n,r,e),i=a.call(n,u,e),o=c.call(n,u,e)+Ms,l=s.call(n,u,e)+Ms;return{r:i,a0:o,a1:l,p0:[i*Math.cos(o),i*Math.sin(o)],p1:[i*Math.cos(l),i*Math.sin(l)]}}function r(n,t){return n.a0==t.a0&&n.a1==t.a1}function e(n,t,r){return"A"+n+","+n+" 0 "+ +(r>ka)+",1 "+t}function u(n,t,r,e){return"Q 0,0 "+e}var i=me,o=ye,a=Lo,c=io,s=oo;return n.radius=function(t){return arguments.length?(a=Et(t),n):a},n.source=function(t){return arguments.length?(i=Et(t),n):i},n.target=function(t){return arguments.length?(o=Et(t),n):o},n.startAngle=function(t){return arguments.length?(c=Et(t),n):c},n.endAngle=function(t){return arguments.length?(s=Et(t),n):s},n},Bo.svg.diagonal=function(){function n(n,u){var i=t.call(this,n,u),o=r.call(this,n,u),a=(i.y+o.y)/2,c=[i,{x:i.x,y:a},{x:o.x,y:a},o];return c=c.map(e),"M"+c[0]+"C"+c[1]+" "+c[2]+" "+c[3]}var t=me,r=ye,e=To;return n.source=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=Et(r),n):t},n.target=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=Et(t),n):r},n.projection=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=t,n):e},n},Bo.svg.diagonal.radial=function(){var n=Bo.svg.diagonal(),t=To,r=n.projection;return n.projection=function(n){return arguments.length?r(qo(t=n)):t},n},Bo.svg.symbol=function(){function n(n,e){return(Es.get(t.call(this,n,e))||Po)(r.call(this,n,e))}var t=Do,r=Ro;return n.type=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=Et(r),n):t},n.size=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=Et(t),n):r},n};var Es=Bo.map({circle:Po,cross:function(n){var t=Math.sqrt(n/5)/2;return"M"+-3*t+","+-t+"H"+-t+"V"+-3*t+"H"+t+"V"+-t+"H"+3*t+"V"+t+"H"+t+"V"+3*t+"H"+-t+"V"+t+"H"+-3*t+"Z"},diamond:function(n){var t=Math.sqrt(n/(2*zs)),r=t*zs;return"M0,"+-t+"L"+r+",0"+" 0,"+t+" "+-r+",0"+"Z"},square:function(n){var t=Math.sqrt(n)/2;return"M"+-t+","+-t+"L"+t+","+-t+" "+t+","+t+" "+-t+","+t+"Z"},"triangle-down":function(n){var t=Math.sqrt(n/Ns),r=t*Ns/2;return"M0,"+r+"L"+t+","+-r+" "+-t+","+-r+"Z"},"triangle-up":function(n){var t=Math.sqrt(n/Ns),r=t*Ns/2;return"M0,"+-r+"L"+t+","+r+" "+-t+","+r+"Z"}});Bo.svg.symbolTypes=Es.keys();var As,Cs,Ns=Math.sqrt(3),zs=Math.tan(30*za),Ls=[],Ts=0;Ls.call=ya.call,Ls.empty=ya.empty,Ls.node=ya.node,Ls.size=ya.size,Bo.transition=function(n){return arguments.length?As?n.transition():n:_a.transition()},Bo.transition.prototype=Ls,Ls.select=function(n){var t,r,e,u=this.id,i=[];n=b(n);for(var o=-1,a=this.length;++oi;i++){u.push(t=[]);for(var r=this[i],a=0,c=r.length;c>a;a++)(e=r[a])&&n.call(e,e.__data__,a,i)&&t.push(e)}return Uo(u,this.id)},Ls.tween=function(n,t){var r=this.id;return arguments.length<2?this.node().__transition__[r].tween.get(n):P(this,null==t?function(t){t.__transition__[r].tween.remove(n)}:function(e){e.__transition__[r].tween.set(n,t)})},Ls.attr=function(n,t){function r(){this.removeAttribute(a)}function e(){this.removeAttributeNS(a.space,a.local)}function u(n){return null==n?r:(n+="",function(){var t,r=this.getAttribute(a);return r!==n&&(t=o(r,n),function(n){this.setAttribute(a,t(n))})})}function i(n){return null==n?e:(n+="",function(){var t,r=this.getAttributeNS(a.space,a.local);return r!==n&&(t=o(r,n),function(n){this.setAttributeNS(a.space,a.local,t(n))})})}if(arguments.length<2){for(t in n)this.attr(t,n[t]);return this}var o="transform"==n?Hu:du,a=Bo.ns.qualify(n);return jo(this,"attr."+n,t,a.local?i:u)},Ls.attrTween=function(n,t){function r(n,r){var e=t.call(this,n,r,this.getAttribute(u));return e&&function(n){this.setAttribute(u,e(n))}}function e(n,r){var e=t.call(this,n,r,this.getAttributeNS(u.space,u.local));return e&&function(n){this.setAttributeNS(u.space,u.local,e(n))}}var u=Bo.ns.qualify(n);return this.tween("attr."+n,u.local?e:r)},Ls.style=function(n,t,r){function e(){this.style.removeProperty(n)}function u(t){return null==t?e:(t+="",function(){var e,u=Qo.getComputedStyle(this,null).getPropertyValue(n);return u!==t&&(e=du(u,t),function(t){this.style.setProperty(n,e(t),r)})})}var i=arguments.length;if(3>i){if("string"!=typeof n){2>i&&(t="");for(r in n)this.style(r,n[r],t);return this}r=""}return jo(this,"style."+n,t,u)},Ls.styleTween=function(n,t,r){function e(e,u){var i=t.call(this,e,u,Qo.getComputedStyle(this,null).getPropertyValue(n));return i&&function(t){this.style.setProperty(n,i(t),r)}}return arguments.length<3&&(r=""),this.tween("style."+n,e)},Ls.text=function(n){return jo(this,"text",n,Ho)},Ls.remove=function(){return this.each("end.transition",function(){var n;this.__transition__.count<2&&(n=this.parentNode)&&n.removeChild(this)})},Ls.ease=function(n){var t=this.id;return arguments.length<1?this.node().__transition__[t].ease:("function"!=typeof n&&(n=Bo.ease.apply(Bo,arguments)),P(this,function(r){r.__transition__[t].ease=n}))},Ls.delay=function(n){var t=this.id;return arguments.length<1?this.node().__transition__[t].delay:P(this,"function"==typeof n?function(r,e,u){r.__transition__[t].delay=+n.call(r,r.__data__,e,u)}:(n=+n,function(r){r.__transition__[t].delay=n}))},Ls.duration=function(n){var t=this.id;return arguments.length<1?this.node().__transition__[t].duration:P(this,"function"==typeof n?function(r,e,u){r.__transition__[t].duration=Math.max(1,n.call(r,r.__data__,e,u))}:(n=Math.max(1,n),function(r){r.__transition__[t].duration=n}))},Ls.each=function(n,t){var r=this.id;if(arguments.length<2){var e=Cs,u=As;As=r,P(this,function(t,e,u){Cs=t.__transition__[r],n.call(t,t.__data__,e,u)}),Cs=e,As=u}else P(this,function(e){var u=e.__transition__[r];(u.event||(u.event=Bo.dispatch("start","end"))).on(n,t)});return this},Ls.transition=function(){for(var n,t,r,e,u=this.id,i=++Ts,o=[],a=0,c=this.length;c>a;a++){o.push(n=[]);for(var t=this[a],s=0,l=t.length;l>s;s++)(r=t[s])&&(e=Object.create(r.__transition__[u]),e.delay+=e.duration,Fo(r,s,i,e)),n.push(r)}return Uo(o,i)},Bo.svg.axis=function(){function n(n){n.each(function(){var n,s=Bo.select(this),l=this.__chart__||r,f=this.__chart__=r.copy(),h=null==c?f.ticks?f.ticks.apply(f,a):f.domain():c,g=null==t?f.tickFormat?f.tickFormat.apply(f,a):At:t,p=s.selectAll(".tick").data(h,f),v=p.enter().insert("g",".domain").attr("class","tick").style("opacity",Ca),d=Bo.transition(p.exit()).style("opacity",Ca).remove(),m=Bo.transition(p.order()).style("opacity",1),y=Pi(f),x=s.selectAll(".domain").data([0]),M=(x.enter().append("path").attr("class","domain"),Bo.transition(x));v.append("line"),v.append("text");var _=v.select("line"),b=m.select("line"),w=p.select("text").text(g),S=v.select("text"),k=m.select("text");switch(e){case"bottom":n=Oo,_.attr("y2",u),S.attr("y",Math.max(u,0)+o),b.attr("x2",0).attr("y2",u),k.attr("x",0).attr("y",Math.max(u,0)+o),w.attr("dy",".71em").style("text-anchor","middle"),M.attr("d","M"+y[0]+","+i+"V0H"+y[1]+"V"+i);break;case"top":n=Oo,_.attr("y2",-u),S.attr("y",-(Math.max(u,0)+o)),b.attr("x2",0).attr("y2",-u),k.attr("x",0).attr("y",-(Math.max(u,0)+o)),w.attr("dy","0em").style("text-anchor","middle"),M.attr("d","M"+y[0]+","+-i+"V0H"+y[1]+"V"+-i);break;case"left":n=Io,_.attr("x2",-u),S.attr("x",-(Math.max(u,0)+o)),b.attr("x2",-u).attr("y2",0),k.attr("x",-(Math.max(u,0)+o)).attr("y",0),w.attr("dy",".32em").style("text-anchor","end"),M.attr("d","M"+-i+","+y[0]+"H0V"+y[1]+"H"+-i);break;case"right":n=Io,_.attr("x2",u),S.attr("x",Math.max(u,0)+o),b.attr("x2",u).attr("y2",0),k.attr("x",Math.max(u,0)+o).attr("y",0),w.attr("dy",".32em").style("text-anchor","start"),M.attr("d","M"+i+","+y[0]+"H0V"+y[1]+"H"+i)}if(f.rangeBand){var E=f,A=E.rangeBand()/2;l=f=function(n){return E(n)+A}}else l.rangeBand?l=f:d.call(n,f);v.call(n,l),m.call(n,f)})}var t,r=Bo.scale.linear(),e=qs,u=6,i=6,o=3,a=[10],c=null;return n.scale=function(t){return arguments.length?(r=t,n):r},n.orient=function(t){return arguments.length?(e=t in Rs?t+"":qs,n):e},n.ticks=function(){return arguments.length?(a=arguments,n):a},n.tickValues=function(t){return arguments.length?(c=t,n):c},n.tickFormat=function(r){return arguments.length?(t=r,n):t},n.tickSize=function(t){var r=arguments.length;return r?(u=+t,i=+arguments[r-1],n):u},n.innerTickSize=function(t){return arguments.length?(u=+t,n):u},n.outerTickSize=function(t){return arguments.length?(i=+t,n):i},n.tickPadding=function(t){return arguments.length?(o=+t,n):o},n.tickSubdivide=function(){return arguments.length&&n},n};var qs="bottom",Rs={top:1,right:1,bottom:1,left:1};Bo.svg.brush=function(){function n(i){i.each(function(){var i=Bo.select(this).style("pointer-events","all").style("-webkit-tap-highlight-color","rgba(0,0,0,0)").on("mousedown.brush",u).on("touchstart.brush",u),o=i.selectAll(".background").data([0]);o.enter().append("rect").attr("class","background").style("visibility","hidden").style("cursor","crosshair"),i.selectAll(".extent").data([0]).enter().append("rect").attr("class","extent").style("cursor","move");var a=i.selectAll(".resize").data(p,At);a.exit().remove(),a.enter().append("g").attr("class",function(n){return"resize "+n}).style("cursor",function(n){return Ds[n]}).append("rect").attr("x",function(n){return/[ew]$/.test(n)?-3:null}).attr("y",function(n){return/^[ns]/.test(n)?-3:null}).attr("width",6).attr("height",6).style("visibility","hidden"),a.style("display",n.empty()?"none":null);var l,f=Bo.transition(i),h=Bo.transition(o);c&&(l=Pi(c),h.attr("x",l[0]).attr("width",l[1]-l[0]),r(f)),s&&(l=Pi(s),h.attr("y",l[0]).attr("height",l[1]-l[0]),e(f)),t(f)})}function t(n){n.selectAll(".resize").attr("transform",function(n){return"translate("+l[+/e$/.test(n)]+","+f[+/^s/.test(n)]+")"})}function r(n){n.select(".extent").attr("x",l[0]),n.selectAll(".extent,.n>rect,.s>rect").attr("width",l[1]-l[0])}function e(n){n.select(".extent").attr("y",f[0]),n.selectAll(".extent,.e>rect,.w>rect").attr("height",f[1]-f[0])}function u(){function u(){32==Bo.event.keyCode&&(C||(x=null,z[0]-=l[1],z[1]-=f[1],C=2),y())}function p(){32==Bo.event.keyCode&&2==C&&(z[0]+=l[1],z[1]+=f[1],C=0,y())}function v(){var n=Bo.mouse(_),u=!1;M&&(n[0]+=M[0],n[1]+=M[1]),C||(Bo.event.altKey?(x||(x=[(l[0]+l[1])/2,(f[0]+f[1])/2]),z[0]=l[+(n[0]p?(u=e,e=p):u=p),v[0]!=e||v[1]!=u?(r?o=null:i=null,v[0]=e,v[1]=u,!0):void 0}function m(){v(),S.style("pointer-events","all").selectAll(".resize").style("display",n.empty()?"none":null),Bo.select("body").style("cursor",null),L.on("mousemove.brush",null).on("mouseup.brush",null).on("touchmove.brush",null).on("touchend.brush",null).on("keydown.brush",null).on("keyup.brush",null),N(),w({type:"brushend"})}var x,M,_=this,b=Bo.select(Bo.event.target),w=a.of(_,arguments),S=Bo.select(_),k=b.datum(),E=!/^(n|s)$/.test(k)&&c,A=!/^(e|w)$/.test(k)&&s,C=b.classed("extent"),N=Y(),z=Bo.mouse(_),L=Bo.select(Qo).on("keydown.brush",u).on("keyup.brush",p);if(Bo.event.changedTouches?L.on("touchmove.brush",v).on("touchend.brush",m):L.on("mousemove.brush",v).on("mouseup.brush",m),S.interrupt().selectAll("*").interrupt(),C)z[0]=l[0]-z[0],z[1]=f[0]-z[1];else if(k){var T=+/w$/.test(k),q=+/^n/.test(k);M=[l[1-T]-z[0],f[1-q]-z[1]],z[0]=l[T],z[1]=f[q]}else Bo.event.altKey&&(x=z.slice());S.style("pointer-events","none").selectAll(".resize").style("display",null),Bo.select("body").style("cursor",b.style("cursor")),w({type:"brushstart"}),v()}var i,o,a=M(n,"brushstart","brush","brushend"),c=null,s=null,l=[0,0],f=[0,0],h=!0,g=!0,p=Ps[0];return n.event=function(n){n.each(function(){var n=a.of(this,arguments),t={x:l,y:f,i:i,j:o},r=this.__chart__||t;this.__chart__=t,As?Bo.select(this).transition().each("start.brush",function(){i=r.i,o=r.j,l=r.x,f=r.y,n({type:"brushstart"})}).tween("brush:brush",function(){var r=mu(l,t.x),e=mu(f,t.y);return i=o=null,function(u){l=t.x=r(u),f=t.y=e(u),n({type:"brush",mode:"resize"})}}).each("end.brush",function(){i=t.i,o=t.j,n({type:"brush",mode:"resize"}),n({type:"brushend"})}):(n({type:"brushstart"}),n({type:"brush",mode:"resize"}),n({type:"brushend"}))})},n.x=function(t){return arguments.length?(c=t,p=Ps[!c<<1|!s],n):c},n.y=function(t){return arguments.length?(s=t,p=Ps[!c<<1|!s],n):s},n.clamp=function(t){return arguments.length?(c&&s?(h=!!t[0],g=!!t[1]):c?h=!!t:s&&(g=!!t),n):c&&s?[h,g]:c?h:s?g:null},n.extent=function(t){var r,e,u,a,h;return arguments.length?(c&&(r=t[0],e=t[1],s&&(r=r[0],e=e[0]),i=[r,e],c.invert&&(r=c(r),e=c(e)),r>e&&(h=r,r=e,e=h),(r!=l[0]||e!=l[1])&&(l=[r,e])),s&&(u=t[0],a=t[1],c&&(u=u[1],a=a[1]),o=[u,a],s.invert&&(u=s(u),a=s(a)),u>a&&(h=u,u=a,a=h),(u!=f[0]||a!=f[1])&&(f=[u,a])),n):(c&&(i?(r=i[0],e=i[1]):(r=l[0],e=l[1],c.invert&&(r=c.invert(r),e=c.invert(e)),r>e&&(h=r,r=e,e=h))),s&&(o?(u=o[0],a=o[1]):(u=f[0],a=f[1],s.invert&&(u=s.invert(u),a=s.invert(a)),u>a&&(h=u,u=a,a=h))),c&&s?[[r,u],[e,a]]:c?[r,e]:s&&[u,a])},n.clear=function(){return n.empty()||(l=[0,0],f=[0,0],i=o=null),n},n.empty=function(){return!!c&&l[0]==l[1]||!!s&&f[0]==f[1]},Bo.rebind(n,a,"on")};var Ds={n:"ns-resize",e:"ew-resize",s:"ns-resize",w:"ew-resize",nw:"nwse-resize",ne:"nesw-resize",se:"nwse-resize",sw:"nesw-resize"},Ps=[["n","e","s","w","nw","ne","se","sw"],["e","w"],["n","s"],[]],Us=rc.format=cc.timeFormat,js=Us.utc,Hs=js("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%LZ");Us.iso=Date.prototype.toISOString&&+new Date("2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")?Yo:Hs,Yo.parse=function(n){var t=new Date(n);return isNaN(t)?null:t},Yo.toString=Hs.toString,rc.second=Ht(function(n){return new ec(1e3*Math.floor(n/1e3))},function(n,t){n.setTime(n.getTime()+1e3*Math.floor(t))},function(n){return n.getSeconds()}),rc.seconds=rc.second.range,rc.seconds.utc=rc.second.utc.range,rc.minute=Ht(function(n){return new ec(6e4*Math.floor(n/6e4))},function(n,t){n.setTime(n.getTime()+6e4*Math.floor(t))},function(n){return n.getMinutes()}),rc.minutes=rc.minute.range,rc.minutes.utc=rc.minute.utc.range,rc.hour=Ht(function(n){var t=n.getTimezoneOffset()/60;return new ec(36e5*(Math.floor(n/36e5-t)+t))},function(n,t){n.setTime(n.getTime()+36e5*Math.floor(t))},function(n){return n.getHours()}),rc.hours=rc.hour.range,rc.hours.utc=rc.hour.utc.range,rc.month=Ht(function(n){return n=rc.day(n),n.setDate(1),n},function(n,t){n.setMonth(n.getMonth()+t)},function(n){return n.getMonth()}),rc.months=rc.month.range,rc.months.utc=rc.month.utc.range;var Fs=[1e3,5e3,15e3,3e4,6e4,3e5,9e5,18e5,36e5,108e5,216e5,432e5,864e5,1728e5,6048e5,2592e6,7776e6,31536e6],Os=[[rc.second,1],[rc.second,5],[rc.second,15],[rc.second,30],[rc.minute,1],[rc.minute,5],[rc.minute,15],[rc.minute,30],[rc.hour,1],[rc.hour,3],[rc.hour,6],[rc.hour,12],[rc.day,1],[rc.day,2],[rc.week,1],[rc.month,1],[rc.month,3],[rc.year,1]],Is=Us.multi([[".%L",function(n){return n.getMilliseconds()}],[":%S",function(n){return n.getSeconds()}],["%I:%M",function(n){return n.getMinutes()}],["%I %p",function(n){return n.getHours()}],["%a %d",function(n){return n.getDay()&&1!=n.getDate()}],["%b %d",function(n){return 1!=n.getDate()}],["%B",function(n){return n.getMonth()}],["%Y",Ar]]),Ys={range:function(n,t,r){return Bo.range(Math.ceil(n/r)*r,+t,r).map(Vo)},floor:At,ceil:At};Os.year=rc.year,rc.scale=function(){return Zo(Bo.scale.linear(),Os,Is)};var Zs=Os.map(function(n){return[n[0].utc,n[1]]}),Vs=js.multi([[".%L",function(n){return n.getUTCMilliseconds()}],[":%S",function(n){return n.getUTCSeconds()}],["%I:%M",function(n){return n.getUTCMinutes()}],["%I %p",function(n){return n.getUTCHours()}],["%a %d",function(n){return n.getUTCDay()&&1!=n.getUTCDate()}],["%b %d",function(n){return 1!=n.getUTCDate()}],["%B",function(n){return n.getUTCMonth()}],["%Y",Ar]]);Zs.year=rc.year.utc,rc.scale.utc=function(){return Zo(Bo.scale.linear(),Zs,Vs)},Bo.text=Ct(function(n){return n.responseText}),Bo.json=function(n,t){return Nt(n,"application/json",$o,t)},Bo.html=function(n,t){return Nt(n,"text/html",Xo,t)},Bo.xml=Ct(function(n){return n.responseXML}),"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define(Bo):"object"==typeof module&&module.exports?module.exports=Bo:this.d3=Bo}(); \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/js/jquery-1.11.1.min.js b/js/jquery-1.11.1.min.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab28a24 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/jquery-1.11.1.min.js @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +/*! jQuery v1.11.1 | (c) 2005, 2014 jQuery Foundation, Inc. | jquery.org/license */ +!function(a,b){"object"==typeof module&&"object"==typeof module.exports?module.exports=a.document?b(a,!0):function(a){if(!a.document)throw new Error("jQuery requires a window with a document");return b(a)}:b(a)}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:this,function(a,b){var c=[],d=c.slice,e=c.concat,f=c.push,g=c.indexOf,h={},i=h.toString,j=h.hasOwnProperty,k={},l="1.11.1",m=function(a,b){return new m.fn.init(a,b)},n=/^[\s\uFEFF\xA0]+|[\s\uFEFF\xA0]+$/g,o=/^-ms-/,p=/-([\da-z])/gi,q=function(a,b){return b.toUpperCase()};m.fn=m.prototype={jquery:l,constructor:m,selector:"",length:0,toArray:function(){return d.call(this)},get:function(a){return null!=a?0>a?this[a+this.length]:this[a]:d.call(this)},pushStack:function(a){var b=m.merge(this.constructor(),a);return b.prevObject=this,b.context=this.context,b},each:function(a,b){return m.each(this,a,b)},map:function(a){return this.pushStack(m.map(this,function(b,c){return a.call(b,c,b)}))},slice:function(){return this.pushStack(d.apply(this,arguments))},first:function(){return this.eq(0)},last:function(){return this.eq(-1)},eq:function(a){var b=this.length,c=+a+(0>a?b:0);return this.pushStack(c>=0&&b>c?[this[c]]:[])},end:function(){return this.prevObject||this.constructor(null)},push:f,sort:c.sort,splice:c.splice},m.extend=m.fn.extend=function(){var a,b,c,d,e,f,g=arguments[0]||{},h=1,i=arguments.length,j=!1;for("boolean"==typeof g&&(j=g,g=arguments[h]||{},h++),"object"==typeof g||m.isFunction(g)||(g={}),h===i&&(g=this,h--);i>h;h++)if(null!=(e=arguments[h]))for(d in e)a=g[d],c=e[d],g!==c&&(j&&c&&(m.isPlainObject(c)||(b=m.isArray(c)))?(b?(b=!1,f=a&&m.isArray(a)?a:[]):f=a&&m.isPlainObject(a)?a:{},g[d]=m.extend(j,f,c)):void 0!==c&&(g[d]=c));return g},m.extend({expando:"jQuery"+(l+Math.random()).replace(/\D/g,""),isReady:!0,error:function(a){throw new Error(a)},noop:function(){},isFunction:function(a){return"function"===m.type(a)},isArray:Array.isArray||function(a){return"array"===m.type(a)},isWindow:function(a){return null!=a&&a==a.window},isNumeric:function(a){return!m.isArray(a)&&a-parseFloat(a)>=0},isEmptyObject:function(a){var b;for(b in a)return!1;return!0},isPlainObject:function(a){var b;if(!a||"object"!==m.type(a)||a.nodeType||m.isWindow(a))return!1;try{if(a.constructor&&!j.call(a,"constructor")&&!j.call(a.constructor.prototype,"isPrototypeOf"))return!1}catch(c){return!1}if(k.ownLast)for(b in a)return j.call(a,b);for(b in a);return void 0===b||j.call(a,b)},type:function(a){return null==a?a+"":"object"==typeof a||"function"==typeof a?h[i.call(a)]||"object":typeof a},globalEval:function(b){b&&m.trim(b)&&(a.execScript||function(b){a.eval.call(a,b)})(b)},camelCase:function(a){return a.replace(o,"ms-").replace(p,q)},nodeName:function(a,b){return a.nodeName&&a.nodeName.toLowerCase()===b.toLowerCase()},each:function(a,b,c){var d,e=0,f=a.length,g=r(a);if(c){if(g){for(;f>e;e++)if(d=b.apply(a[e],c),d===!1)break}else for(e in a)if(d=b.apply(a[e],c),d===!1)break}else if(g){for(;f>e;e++)if(d=b.call(a[e],e,a[e]),d===!1)break}else for(e in a)if(d=b.call(a[e],e,a[e]),d===!1)break;return a},trim:function(a){return null==a?"":(a+"").replace(n,"")},makeArray:function(a,b){var c=b||[];return null!=a&&(r(Object(a))?m.merge(c,"string"==typeof a?[a]:a):f.call(c,a)),c},inArray:function(a,b,c){var d;if(b){if(g)return g.call(b,a,c);for(d=b.length,c=c?0>c?Math.max(0,d+c):c:0;d>c;c++)if(c in b&&b[c]===a)return c}return-1},merge:function(a,b){var c=+b.length,d=0,e=a.length;while(c>d)a[e++]=b[d++];if(c!==c)while(void 0!==b[d])a[e++]=b[d++];return a.length=e,a},grep:function(a,b,c){for(var d,e=[],f=0,g=a.length,h=!c;g>f;f++)d=!b(a[f],f),d!==h&&e.push(a[f]);return e},map:function(a,b,c){var d,f=0,g=a.length,h=r(a),i=[];if(h)for(;g>f;f++)d=b(a[f],f,c),null!=d&&i.push(d);else for(f in a)d=b(a[f],f,c),null!=d&&i.push(d);return e.apply([],i)},guid:1,proxy:function(a,b){var c,e,f;return"string"==typeof b&&(f=a[b],b=a,a=f),m.isFunction(a)?(c=d.call(arguments,2),e=function(){return a.apply(b||this,c.concat(d.call(arguments)))},e.guid=a.guid=a.guid||m.guid++,e):void 0},now:function(){return+new Date},support:k}),m.each("Boolean Number String Function Array Date RegExp Object Error".split(" "),function(a,b){h["[object "+b+"]"]=b.toLowerCase()});function r(a){var b=a.length,c=m.type(a);return"function"===c||m.isWindow(a)?!1:1===a.nodeType&&b?!0:"array"===c||0===b||"number"==typeof b&&b>0&&b-1 in a}var s=function(a){var b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u="sizzle"+-new Date,v=a.document,w=0,x=0,y=gb(),z=gb(),A=gb(),B=function(a,b){return a===b&&(l=!0),0},C="undefined",D=1<<31,E={}.hasOwnProperty,F=[],G=F.pop,H=F.push,I=F.push,J=F.slice,K=F.indexOf||function(a){for(var b=0,c=this.length;c>b;b++)if(this[b]===a)return b;return-1},L="checked|selected|async|autofocus|autoplay|controls|defer|disabled|hidden|ismap|loop|multiple|open|readonly|required|scoped",M="[\\x20\\t\\r\\n\\f]",N="(?:\\\\.|[\\w-]|[^\\x00-\\xa0])+",O=N.replace("w","w#"),P="\\["+M+"*("+N+")(?:"+M+"*([*^$|!~]?=)"+M+"*(?:'((?:\\\\.|[^\\\\'])*)'|\"((?:\\\\.|[^\\\\\"])*)\"|("+O+"))|)"+M+"*\\]",Q=":("+N+")(?:\\((('((?:\\\\.|[^\\\\'])*)'|\"((?:\\\\.|[^\\\\\"])*)\")|((?:\\\\.|[^\\\\()[\\]]|"+P+")*)|.*)\\)|)",R=new RegExp("^"+M+"+|((?:^|[^\\\\])(?:\\\\.)*)"+M+"+$","g"),S=new RegExp("^"+M+"*,"+M+"*"),T=new RegExp("^"+M+"*([>+~]|"+M+")"+M+"*"),U=new RegExp("="+M+"*([^\\]'\"]*?)"+M+"*\\]","g"),V=new RegExp(Q),W=new RegExp("^"+O+"$"),X={ID:new RegExp("^#("+N+")"),CLASS:new RegExp("^\\.("+N+")"),TAG:new RegExp("^("+N.replace("w","w*")+")"),ATTR:new RegExp("^"+P),PSEUDO:new RegExp("^"+Q),CHILD:new RegExp("^:(only|first|last|nth|nth-last)-(child|of-type)(?:\\("+M+"*(even|odd|(([+-]|)(\\d*)n|)"+M+"*(?:([+-]|)"+M+"*(\\d+)|))"+M+"*\\)|)","i"),bool:new RegExp("^(?:"+L+")$","i"),needsContext:new RegExp("^"+M+"*[>+~]|:(even|odd|eq|gt|lt|nth|first|last)(?:\\("+M+"*((?:-\\d)?\\d*)"+M+"*\\)|)(?=[^-]|$)","i")},Y=/^(?:input|select|textarea|button)$/i,Z=/^h\d$/i,$=/^[^{]+\{\s*\[native \w/,_=/^(?:#([\w-]+)|(\w+)|\.([\w-]+))$/,ab=/[+~]/,bb=/'|\\/g,cb=new RegExp("\\\\([\\da-f]{1,6}"+M+"?|("+M+")|.)","ig"),db=function(a,b,c){var d="0x"+b-65536;return d!==d||c?b:0>d?String.fromCharCode(d+65536):String.fromCharCode(d>>10|55296,1023&d|56320)};try{I.apply(F=J.call(v.childNodes),v.childNodes),F[v.childNodes.length].nodeType}catch(eb){I={apply:F.length?function(a,b){H.apply(a,J.call(b))}:function(a,b){var c=a.length,d=0;while(a[c++]=b[d++]);a.length=c-1}}}function fb(a,b,d,e){var f,h,j,k,l,o,r,s,w,x;if((b?b.ownerDocument||b:v)!==n&&m(b),b=b||n,d=d||[],!a||"string"!=typeof a)return d;if(1!==(k=b.nodeType)&&9!==k)return[];if(p&&!e){if(f=_.exec(a))if(j=f[1]){if(9===k){if(h=b.getElementById(j),!h||!h.parentNode)return d;if(h.id===j)return d.push(h),d}else if(b.ownerDocument&&(h=b.ownerDocument.getElementById(j))&&t(b,h)&&h.id===j)return d.push(h),d}else{if(f[2])return I.apply(d,b.getElementsByTagName(a)),d;if((j=f[3])&&c.getElementsByClassName&&b.getElementsByClassName)return I.apply(d,b.getElementsByClassName(j)),d}if(c.qsa&&(!q||!q.test(a))){if(s=r=u,w=b,x=9===k&&a,1===k&&"object"!==b.nodeName.toLowerCase()){o=g(a),(r=b.getAttribute("id"))?s=r.replace(bb,"\\$&"):b.setAttribute("id",s),s="[id='"+s+"'] ",l=o.length;while(l--)o[l]=s+qb(o[l]);w=ab.test(a)&&ob(b.parentNode)||b,x=o.join(",")}if(x)try{return I.apply(d,w.querySelectorAll(x)),d}catch(y){}finally{r||b.removeAttribute("id")}}}return i(a.replace(R,"$1"),b,d,e)}function gb(){var a=[];function b(c,e){return a.push(c+" ")>d.cacheLength&&delete b[a.shift()],b[c+" "]=e}return b}function hb(a){return a[u]=!0,a}function ib(a){var b=n.createElement("div");try{return!!a(b)}catch(c){return!1}finally{b.parentNode&&b.parentNode.removeChild(b),b=null}}function jb(a,b){var c=a.split("|"),e=a.length;while(e--)d.attrHandle[c[e]]=b}function kb(a,b){var c=b&&a,d=c&&1===a.nodeType&&1===b.nodeType&&(~b.sourceIndex||D)-(~a.sourceIndex||D);if(d)return d;if(c)while(c=c.nextSibling)if(c===b)return-1;return a?1:-1}function lb(a){return function(b){var c=b.nodeName.toLowerCase();return"input"===c&&b.type===a}}function mb(a){return function(b){var c=b.nodeName.toLowerCase();return("input"===c||"button"===c)&&b.type===a}}function nb(a){return hb(function(b){return b=+b,hb(function(c,d){var e,f=a([],c.length,b),g=f.length;while(g--)c[e=f[g]]&&(c[e]=!(d[e]=c[e]))})})}function ob(a){return a&&typeof a.getElementsByTagName!==C&&a}c=fb.support={},f=fb.isXML=function(a){var b=a&&(a.ownerDocument||a).documentElement;return b?"HTML"!==b.nodeName:!1},m=fb.setDocument=function(a){var b,e=a?a.ownerDocument||a:v,g=e.defaultView;return e!==n&&9===e.nodeType&&e.documentElement?(n=e,o=e.documentElement,p=!f(e),g&&g!==g.top&&(g.addEventListener?g.addEventListener("unload",function(){m()},!1):g.attachEvent&&g.attachEvent("onunload",function(){m()})),c.attributes=ib(function(a){return a.className="i",!a.getAttribute("className")}),c.getElementsByTagName=ib(function(a){return a.appendChild(e.createComment("")),!a.getElementsByTagName("*").length}),c.getElementsByClassName=$.test(e.getElementsByClassName)&&ib(function(a){return a.innerHTML="
",a.firstChild.className="i",2===a.getElementsByClassName("i").length}),c.getById=ib(function(a){return o.appendChild(a).id=u,!e.getElementsByName||!e.getElementsByName(u).length}),c.getById?(d.find.ID=function(a,b){if(typeof b.getElementById!==C&&p){var c=b.getElementById(a);return c&&c.parentNode?[c]:[]}},d.filter.ID=function(a){var b=a.replace(cb,db);return function(a){return a.getAttribute("id")===b}}):(delete d.find.ID,d.filter.ID=function(a){var b=a.replace(cb,db);return function(a){var c=typeof a.getAttributeNode!==C&&a.getAttributeNode("id");return c&&c.value===b}}),d.find.TAG=c.getElementsByTagName?function(a,b){return typeof b.getElementsByTagName!==C?b.getElementsByTagName(a):void 0}:function(a,b){var c,d=[],e=0,f=b.getElementsByTagName(a);if("*"===a){while(c=f[e++])1===c.nodeType&&d.push(c);return d}return f},d.find.CLASS=c.getElementsByClassName&&function(a,b){return typeof b.getElementsByClassName!==C&&p?b.getElementsByClassName(a):void 0},r=[],q=[],(c.qsa=$.test(e.querySelectorAll))&&(ib(function(a){a.innerHTML="",a.querySelectorAll("[msallowclip^='']").length&&q.push("[*^$]="+M+"*(?:''|\"\")"),a.querySelectorAll("[selected]").length||q.push("\\["+M+"*(?:value|"+L+")"),a.querySelectorAll(":checked").length||q.push(":checked")}),ib(function(a){var b=e.createElement("input");b.setAttribute("type","hidden"),a.appendChild(b).setAttribute("name","D"),a.querySelectorAll("[name=d]").length&&q.push("name"+M+"*[*^$|!~]?="),a.querySelectorAll(":enabled").length||q.push(":enabled",":disabled"),a.querySelectorAll("*,:x"),q.push(",.*:")})),(c.matchesSelector=$.test(s=o.matches||o.webkitMatchesSelector||o.mozMatchesSelector||o.oMatchesSelector||o.msMatchesSelector))&&ib(function(a){c.disconnectedMatch=s.call(a,"div"),s.call(a,"[s!='']:x"),r.push("!=",Q)}),q=q.length&&new RegExp(q.join("|")),r=r.length&&new RegExp(r.join("|")),b=$.test(o.compareDocumentPosition),t=b||$.test(o.contains)?function(a,b){var c=9===a.nodeType?a.documentElement:a,d=b&&b.parentNode;return a===d||!(!d||1!==d.nodeType||!(c.contains?c.contains(d):a.compareDocumentPosition&&16&a.compareDocumentPosition(d)))}:function(a,b){if(b)while(b=b.parentNode)if(b===a)return!0;return!1},B=b?function(a,b){if(a===b)return l=!0,0;var d=!a.compareDocumentPosition-!b.compareDocumentPosition;return d?d:(d=(a.ownerDocument||a)===(b.ownerDocument||b)?a.compareDocumentPosition(b):1,1&d||!c.sortDetached&&b.compareDocumentPosition(a)===d?a===e||a.ownerDocument===v&&t(v,a)?-1:b===e||b.ownerDocument===v&&t(v,b)?1:k?K.call(k,a)-K.call(k,b):0:4&d?-1:1)}:function(a,b){if(a===b)return l=!0,0;var c,d=0,f=a.parentNode,g=b.parentNode,h=[a],i=[b];if(!f||!g)return a===e?-1:b===e?1:f?-1:g?1:k?K.call(k,a)-K.call(k,b):0;if(f===g)return kb(a,b);c=a;while(c=c.parentNode)h.unshift(c);c=b;while(c=c.parentNode)i.unshift(c);while(h[d]===i[d])d++;return d?kb(h[d],i[d]):h[d]===v?-1:i[d]===v?1:0},e):n},fb.matches=function(a,b){return fb(a,null,null,b)},fb.matchesSelector=function(a,b){if((a.ownerDocument||a)!==n&&m(a),b=b.replace(U,"='$1']"),!(!c.matchesSelector||!p||r&&r.test(b)||q&&q.test(b)))try{var d=s.call(a,b);if(d||c.disconnectedMatch||a.document&&11!==a.document.nodeType)return d}catch(e){}return fb(b,n,null,[a]).length>0},fb.contains=function(a,b){return(a.ownerDocument||a)!==n&&m(a),t(a,b)},fb.attr=function(a,b){(a.ownerDocument||a)!==n&&m(a);var e=d.attrHandle[b.toLowerCase()],f=e&&E.call(d.attrHandle,b.toLowerCase())?e(a,b,!p):void 0;return void 0!==f?f:c.attributes||!p?a.getAttribute(b):(f=a.getAttributeNode(b))&&f.specified?f.value:null},fb.error=function(a){throw new Error("Syntax error, unrecognized expression: "+a)},fb.uniqueSort=function(a){var b,d=[],e=0,f=0;if(l=!c.detectDuplicates,k=!c.sortStable&&a.slice(0),a.sort(B),l){while(b=a[f++])b===a[f]&&(e=d.push(f));while(e--)a.splice(d[e],1)}return k=null,a},e=fb.getText=function(a){var b,c="",d=0,f=a.nodeType;if(f){if(1===f||9===f||11===f){if("string"==typeof a.textContent)return a.textContent;for(a=a.firstChild;a;a=a.nextSibling)c+=e(a)}else if(3===f||4===f)return a.nodeValue}else while(b=a[d++])c+=e(b);return c},d=fb.selectors={cacheLength:50,createPseudo:hb,match:X,attrHandle:{},find:{},relative:{">":{dir:"parentNode",first:!0}," ":{dir:"parentNode"},"+":{dir:"previousSibling",first:!0},"~":{dir:"previousSibling"}},preFilter:{ATTR:function(a){return a[1]=a[1].replace(cb,db),a[3]=(a[3]||a[4]||a[5]||"").replace(cb,db),"~="===a[2]&&(a[3]=" "+a[3]+" "),a.slice(0,4)},CHILD:function(a){return a[1]=a[1].toLowerCase(),"nth"===a[1].slice(0,3)?(a[3]||fb.error(a[0]),a[4]=+(a[4]?a[5]+(a[6]||1):2*("even"===a[3]||"odd"===a[3])),a[5]=+(a[7]+a[8]||"odd"===a[3])):a[3]&&fb.error(a[0]),a},PSEUDO:function(a){var b,c=!a[6]&&a[2];return X.CHILD.test(a[0])?null:(a[3]?a[2]=a[4]||a[5]||"":c&&V.test(c)&&(b=g(c,!0))&&(b=c.indexOf(")",c.length-b)-c.length)&&(a[0]=a[0].slice(0,b),a[2]=c.slice(0,b)),a.slice(0,3))}},filter:{TAG:function(a){var b=a.replace(cb,db).toLowerCase();return"*"===a?function(){return!0}:function(a){return a.nodeName&&a.nodeName.toLowerCase()===b}},CLASS:function(a){var b=y[a+" "];return b||(b=new RegExp("(^|"+M+")"+a+"("+M+"|$)"))&&y(a,function(a){return b.test("string"==typeof a.className&&a.className||typeof a.getAttribute!==C&&a.getAttribute("class")||"")})},ATTR:function(a,b,c){return function(d){var e=fb.attr(d,a);return null==e?"!="===b:b?(e+="","="===b?e===c:"!="===b?e!==c:"^="===b?c&&0===e.indexOf(c):"*="===b?c&&e.indexOf(c)>-1:"$="===b?c&&e.slice(-c.length)===c:"~="===b?(" "+e+" ").indexOf(c)>-1:"|="===b?e===c||e.slice(0,c.length+1)===c+"-":!1):!0}},CHILD:function(a,b,c,d,e){var f="nth"!==a.slice(0,3),g="last"!==a.slice(-4),h="of-type"===b;return 1===d&&0===e?function(a){return!!a.parentNode}:function(b,c,i){var j,k,l,m,n,o,p=f!==g?"nextSibling":"previousSibling",q=b.parentNode,r=h&&b.nodeName.toLowerCase(),s=!i&&!h;if(q){if(f){while(p){l=b;while(l=l[p])if(h?l.nodeName.toLowerCase()===r:1===l.nodeType)return!1;o=p="only"===a&&!o&&"nextSibling"}return!0}if(o=[g?q.firstChild:q.lastChild],g&&s){k=q[u]||(q[u]={}),j=k[a]||[],n=j[0]===w&&j[1],m=j[0]===w&&j[2],l=n&&q.childNodes[n];while(l=++n&&l&&l[p]||(m=n=0)||o.pop())if(1===l.nodeType&&++m&&l===b){k[a]=[w,n,m];break}}else if(s&&(j=(b[u]||(b[u]={}))[a])&&j[0]===w)m=j[1];else while(l=++n&&l&&l[p]||(m=n=0)||o.pop())if((h?l.nodeName.toLowerCase()===r:1===l.nodeType)&&++m&&(s&&((l[u]||(l[u]={}))[a]=[w,m]),l===b))break;return m-=e,m===d||m%d===0&&m/d>=0}}},PSEUDO:function(a,b){var c,e=d.pseudos[a]||d.setFilters[a.toLowerCase()]||fb.error("unsupported pseudo: "+a);return e[u]?e(b):e.length>1?(c=[a,a,"",b],d.setFilters.hasOwnProperty(a.toLowerCase())?hb(function(a,c){var d,f=e(a,b),g=f.length;while(g--)d=K.call(a,f[g]),a[d]=!(c[d]=f[g])}):function(a){return e(a,0,c)}):e}},pseudos:{not:hb(function(a){var b=[],c=[],d=h(a.replace(R,"$1"));return d[u]?hb(function(a,b,c,e){var f,g=d(a,null,e,[]),h=a.length;while(h--)(f=g[h])&&(a[h]=!(b[h]=f))}):function(a,e,f){return b[0]=a,d(b,null,f,c),!c.pop()}}),has:hb(function(a){return function(b){return fb(a,b).length>0}}),contains:hb(function(a){return function(b){return(b.textContent||b.innerText||e(b)).indexOf(a)>-1}}),lang:hb(function(a){return W.test(a||"")||fb.error("unsupported lang: "+a),a=a.replace(cb,db).toLowerCase(),function(b){var c;do if(c=p?b.lang:b.getAttribute("xml:lang")||b.getAttribute("lang"))return c=c.toLowerCase(),c===a||0===c.indexOf(a+"-");while((b=b.parentNode)&&1===b.nodeType);return!1}}),target:function(b){var c=a.location&&a.location.hash;return c&&c.slice(1)===b.id},root:function(a){return a===o},focus:function(a){return a===n.activeElement&&(!n.hasFocus||n.hasFocus())&&!!(a.type||a.href||~a.tabIndex)},enabled:function(a){return a.disabled===!1},disabled:function(a){return a.disabled===!0},checked:function(a){var b=a.nodeName.toLowerCase();return"input"===b&&!!a.checked||"option"===b&&!!a.selected},selected:function(a){return a.parentNode&&a.parentNode.selectedIndex,a.selected===!0},empty:function(a){for(a=a.firstChild;a;a=a.nextSibling)if(a.nodeType<6)return!1;return!0},parent:function(a){return!d.pseudos.empty(a)},header:function(a){return Z.test(a.nodeName)},input:function(a){return Y.test(a.nodeName)},button:function(a){var b=a.nodeName.toLowerCase();return"input"===b&&"button"===a.type||"button"===b},text:function(a){var b;return"input"===a.nodeName.toLowerCase()&&"text"===a.type&&(null==(b=a.getAttribute("type"))||"text"===b.toLowerCase())},first:nb(function(){return[0]}),last:nb(function(a,b){return[b-1]}),eq:nb(function(a,b,c){return[0>c?c+b:c]}),even:nb(function(a,b){for(var c=0;b>c;c+=2)a.push(c);return a}),odd:nb(function(a,b){for(var c=1;b>c;c+=2)a.push(c);return a}),lt:nb(function(a,b,c){for(var d=0>c?c+b:c;--d>=0;)a.push(d);return a}),gt:nb(function(a,b,c){for(var d=0>c?c+b:c;++db;b++)d+=a[b].value;return d}function rb(a,b,c){var d=b.dir,e=c&&"parentNode"===d,f=x++;return b.first?function(b,c,f){while(b=b[d])if(1===b.nodeType||e)return a(b,c,f)}:function(b,c,g){var h,i,j=[w,f];if(g){while(b=b[d])if((1===b.nodeType||e)&&a(b,c,g))return!0}else while(b=b[d])if(1===b.nodeType||e){if(i=b[u]||(b[u]={}),(h=i[d])&&h[0]===w&&h[1]===f)return j[2]=h[2];if(i[d]=j,j[2]=a(b,c,g))return!0}}}function sb(a){return a.length>1?function(b,c,d){var e=a.length;while(e--)if(!a[e](b,c,d))return!1;return!0}:a[0]}function tb(a,b,c){for(var d=0,e=b.length;e>d;d++)fb(a,b[d],c);return c}function ub(a,b,c,d,e){for(var f,g=[],h=0,i=a.length,j=null!=b;i>h;h++)(f=a[h])&&(!c||c(f,d,e))&&(g.push(f),j&&b.push(h));return g}function vb(a,b,c,d,e,f){return d&&!d[u]&&(d=vb(d)),e&&!e[u]&&(e=vb(e,f)),hb(function(f,g,h,i){var j,k,l,m=[],n=[],o=g.length,p=f||tb(b||"*",h.nodeType?[h]:h,[]),q=!a||!f&&b?p:ub(p,m,a,h,i),r=c?e||(f?a:o||d)?[]:g:q;if(c&&c(q,r,h,i),d){j=ub(r,n),d(j,[],h,i),k=j.length;while(k--)(l=j[k])&&(r[n[k]]=!(q[n[k]]=l))}if(f){if(e||a){if(e){j=[],k=r.length;while(k--)(l=r[k])&&j.push(q[k]=l);e(null,r=[],j,i)}k=r.length;while(k--)(l=r[k])&&(j=e?K.call(f,l):m[k])>-1&&(f[j]=!(g[j]=l))}}else r=ub(r===g?r.splice(o,r.length):r),e?e(null,g,r,i):I.apply(g,r)})}function wb(a){for(var b,c,e,f=a.length,g=d.relative[a[0].type],h=g||d.relative[" "],i=g?1:0,k=rb(function(a){return a===b},h,!0),l=rb(function(a){return K.call(b,a)>-1},h,!0),m=[function(a,c,d){return!g&&(d||c!==j)||((b=c).nodeType?k(a,c,d):l(a,c,d))}];f>i;i++)if(c=d.relative[a[i].type])m=[rb(sb(m),c)];else{if(c=d.filter[a[i].type].apply(null,a[i].matches),c[u]){for(e=++i;f>e;e++)if(d.relative[a[e].type])break;return vb(i>1&&sb(m),i>1&&qb(a.slice(0,i-1).concat({value:" "===a[i-2].type?"*":""})).replace(R,"$1"),c,e>i&&wb(a.slice(i,e)),f>e&&wb(a=a.slice(e)),f>e&&qb(a))}m.push(c)}return sb(m)}function xb(a,b){var c=b.length>0,e=a.length>0,f=function(f,g,h,i,k){var l,m,o,p=0,q="0",r=f&&[],s=[],t=j,u=f||e&&d.find.TAG("*",k),v=w+=null==t?1:Math.random()||.1,x=u.length;for(k&&(j=g!==n&&g);q!==x&&null!=(l=u[q]);q++){if(e&&l){m=0;while(o=a[m++])if(o(l,g,h)){i.push(l);break}k&&(w=v)}c&&((l=!o&&l)&&p--,f&&r.push(l))}if(p+=q,c&&q!==p){m=0;while(o=b[m++])o(r,s,g,h);if(f){if(p>0)while(q--)r[q]||s[q]||(s[q]=G.call(i));s=ub(s)}I.apply(i,s),k&&!f&&s.length>0&&p+b.length>1&&fb.uniqueSort(i)}return k&&(w=v,j=t),r};return c?hb(f):f}return h=fb.compile=function(a,b){var c,d=[],e=[],f=A[a+" "];if(!f){b||(b=g(a)),c=b.length;while(c--)f=wb(b[c]),f[u]?d.push(f):e.push(f);f=A(a,xb(e,d)),f.selector=a}return f},i=fb.select=function(a,b,e,f){var i,j,k,l,m,n="function"==typeof a&&a,o=!f&&g(a=n.selector||a);if(e=e||[],1===o.length){if(j=o[0]=o[0].slice(0),j.length>2&&"ID"===(k=j[0]).type&&c.getById&&9===b.nodeType&&p&&d.relative[j[1].type]){if(b=(d.find.ID(k.matches[0].replace(cb,db),b)||[])[0],!b)return e;n&&(b=b.parentNode),a=a.slice(j.shift().value.length)}i=X.needsContext.test(a)?0:j.length;while(i--){if(k=j[i],d.relative[l=k.type])break;if((m=d.find[l])&&(f=m(k.matches[0].replace(cb,db),ab.test(j[0].type)&&ob(b.parentNode)||b))){if(j.splice(i,1),a=f.length&&qb(j),!a)return I.apply(e,f),e;break}}}return(n||h(a,o))(f,b,!p,e,ab.test(a)&&ob(b.parentNode)||b),e},c.sortStable=u.split("").sort(B).join("")===u,c.detectDuplicates=!!l,m(),c.sortDetached=ib(function(a){return 1&a.compareDocumentPosition(n.createElement("div"))}),ib(function(a){return a.innerHTML="","#"===a.firstChild.getAttribute("href")})||jb("type|href|height|width",function(a,b,c){return c?void 0:a.getAttribute(b,"type"===b.toLowerCase()?1:2)}),c.attributes&&ib(function(a){return a.innerHTML="",a.firstChild.setAttribute("value",""),""===a.firstChild.getAttribute("value")})||jb("value",function(a,b,c){return c||"input"!==a.nodeName.toLowerCase()?void 0:a.defaultValue}),ib(function(a){return null==a.getAttribute("disabled")})||jb(L,function(a,b,c){var d;return c?void 0:a[b]===!0?b.toLowerCase():(d=a.getAttributeNode(b))&&d.specified?d.value:null}),fb}(a);m.find=s,m.expr=s.selectors,m.expr[":"]=m.expr.pseudos,m.unique=s.uniqueSort,m.text=s.getText,m.isXMLDoc=s.isXML,m.contains=s.contains;var t=m.expr.match.needsContext,u=/^<(\w+)\s*\/?>(?:<\/\1>|)$/,v=/^.[^:#\[\.,]*$/;function w(a,b,c){if(m.isFunction(b))return m.grep(a,function(a,d){return!!b.call(a,d,a)!==c});if(b.nodeType)return m.grep(a,function(a){return a===b!==c});if("string"==typeof b){if(v.test(b))return m.filter(b,a,c);b=m.filter(b,a)}return m.grep(a,function(a){return m.inArray(a,b)>=0!==c})}m.filter=function(a,b,c){var d=b[0];return c&&(a=":not("+a+")"),1===b.length&&1===d.nodeType?m.find.matchesSelector(d,a)?[d]:[]:m.find.matches(a,m.grep(b,function(a){return 1===a.nodeType}))},m.fn.extend({find:function(a){var b,c=[],d=this,e=d.length;if("string"!=typeof a)return this.pushStack(m(a).filter(function(){for(b=0;e>b;b++)if(m.contains(d[b],this))return!0}));for(b=0;e>b;b++)m.find(a,d[b],c);return c=this.pushStack(e>1?m.unique(c):c),c.selector=this.selector?this.selector+" "+a:a,c},filter:function(a){return this.pushStack(w(this,a||[],!1))},not:function(a){return this.pushStack(w(this,a||[],!0))},is:function(a){return!!w(this,"string"==typeof a&&t.test(a)?m(a):a||[],!1).length}});var x,y=a.document,z=/^(?:\s*(<[\w\W]+>)[^>]*|#([\w-]*))$/,A=m.fn.init=function(a,b){var c,d;if(!a)return this;if("string"==typeof a){if(c="<"===a.charAt(0)&&">"===a.charAt(a.length-1)&&a.length>=3?[null,a,null]:z.exec(a),!c||!c[1]&&b)return!b||b.jquery?(b||x).find(a):this.constructor(b).find(a);if(c[1]){if(b=b instanceof m?b[0]:b,m.merge(this,m.parseHTML(c[1],b&&b.nodeType?b.ownerDocument||b:y,!0)),u.test(c[1])&&m.isPlainObject(b))for(c in b)m.isFunction(this[c])?this[c](b[c]):this.attr(c,b[c]);return this}if(d=y.getElementById(c[2]),d&&d.parentNode){if(d.id!==c[2])return x.find(a);this.length=1,this[0]=d}return this.context=y,this.selector=a,this}return a.nodeType?(this.context=this[0]=a,this.length=1,this):m.isFunction(a)?"undefined"!=typeof x.ready?x.ready(a):a(m):(void 0!==a.selector&&(this.selector=a.selector,this.context=a.context),m.makeArray(a,this))};A.prototype=m.fn,x=m(y);var B=/^(?:parents|prev(?:Until|All))/,C={children:!0,contents:!0,next:!0,prev:!0};m.extend({dir:function(a,b,c){var d=[],e=a[b];while(e&&9!==e.nodeType&&(void 0===c||1!==e.nodeType||!m(e).is(c)))1===e.nodeType&&d.push(e),e=e[b];return d},sibling:function(a,b){for(var c=[];a;a=a.nextSibling)1===a.nodeType&&a!==b&&c.push(a);return c}}),m.fn.extend({has:function(a){var b,c=m(a,this),d=c.length;return this.filter(function(){for(b=0;d>b;b++)if(m.contains(this,c[b]))return!0})},closest:function(a,b){for(var c,d=0,e=this.length,f=[],g=t.test(a)||"string"!=typeof a?m(a,b||this.context):0;e>d;d++)for(c=this[d];c&&c!==b;c=c.parentNode)if(c.nodeType<11&&(g?g.index(c)>-1:1===c.nodeType&&m.find.matchesSelector(c,a))){f.push(c);break}return this.pushStack(f.length>1?m.unique(f):f)},index:function(a){return a?"string"==typeof a?m.inArray(this[0],m(a)):m.inArray(a.jquery?a[0]:a,this):this[0]&&this[0].parentNode?this.first().prevAll().length:-1},add:function(a,b){return this.pushStack(m.unique(m.merge(this.get(),m(a,b))))},addBack:function(a){return this.add(null==a?this.prevObject:this.prevObject.filter(a))}});function D(a,b){do a=a[b];while(a&&1!==a.nodeType);return a}m.each({parent:function(a){var b=a.parentNode;return b&&11!==b.nodeType?b:null},parents:function(a){return m.dir(a,"parentNode")},parentsUntil:function(a,b,c){return m.dir(a,"parentNode",c)},next:function(a){return D(a,"nextSibling")},prev:function(a){return D(a,"previousSibling")},nextAll:function(a){return m.dir(a,"nextSibling")},prevAll:function(a){return m.dir(a,"previousSibling")},nextUntil:function(a,b,c){return m.dir(a,"nextSibling",c)},prevUntil:function(a,b,c){return m.dir(a,"previousSibling",c)},siblings:function(a){return m.sibling((a.parentNode||{}).firstChild,a)},children:function(a){return m.sibling(a.firstChild)},contents:function(a){return m.nodeName(a,"iframe")?a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document:m.merge([],a.childNodes)}},function(a,b){m.fn[a]=function(c,d){var e=m.map(this,b,c);return"Until"!==a.slice(-5)&&(d=c),d&&"string"==typeof d&&(e=m.filter(d,e)),this.length>1&&(C[a]||(e=m.unique(e)),B.test(a)&&(e=e.reverse())),this.pushStack(e)}});var E=/\S+/g,F={};function G(a){var b=F[a]={};return m.each(a.match(E)||[],function(a,c){b[c]=!0}),b}m.Callbacks=function(a){a="string"==typeof a?F[a]||G(a):m.extend({},a);var b,c,d,e,f,g,h=[],i=!a.once&&[],j=function(l){for(c=a.memory&&l,d=!0,f=g||0,g=0,e=h.length,b=!0;h&&e>f;f++)if(h[f].apply(l[0],l[1])===!1&&a.stopOnFalse){c=!1;break}b=!1,h&&(i?i.length&&j(i.shift()):c?h=[]:k.disable())},k={add:function(){if(h){var d=h.length;!function f(b){m.each(b,function(b,c){var d=m.type(c);"function"===d?a.unique&&k.has(c)||h.push(c):c&&c.length&&"string"!==d&&f(c)})}(arguments),b?e=h.length:c&&(g=d,j(c))}return this},remove:function(){return h&&m.each(arguments,function(a,c){var d;while((d=m.inArray(c,h,d))>-1)h.splice(d,1),b&&(e>=d&&e--,f>=d&&f--)}),this},has:function(a){return a?m.inArray(a,h)>-1:!(!h||!h.length)},empty:function(){return h=[],e=0,this},disable:function(){return h=i=c=void 0,this},disabled:function(){return!h},lock:function(){return i=void 0,c||k.disable(),this},locked:function(){return!i},fireWith:function(a,c){return!h||d&&!i||(c=c||[],c=[a,c.slice?c.slice():c],b?i.push(c):j(c)),this},fire:function(){return k.fireWith(this,arguments),this},fired:function(){return!!d}};return k},m.extend({Deferred:function(a){var b=[["resolve","done",m.Callbacks("once memory"),"resolved"],["reject","fail",m.Callbacks("once memory"),"rejected"],["notify","progress",m.Callbacks("memory")]],c="pending",d={state:function(){return c},always:function(){return e.done(arguments).fail(arguments),this},then:function(){var a=arguments;return m.Deferred(function(c){m.each(b,function(b,f){var g=m.isFunction(a[b])&&a[b];e[f[1]](function(){var a=g&&g.apply(this,arguments);a&&m.isFunction(a.promise)?a.promise().done(c.resolve).fail(c.reject).progress(c.notify):c[f[0]+"With"](this===d?c.promise():this,g?[a]:arguments)})}),a=null}).promise()},promise:function(a){return null!=a?m.extend(a,d):d}},e={};return d.pipe=d.then,m.each(b,function(a,f){var g=f[2],h=f[3];d[f[1]]=g.add,h&&g.add(function(){c=h},b[1^a][2].disable,b[2][2].lock),e[f[0]]=function(){return e[f[0]+"With"](this===e?d:this,arguments),this},e[f[0]+"With"]=g.fireWith}),d.promise(e),a&&a.call(e,e),e},when:function(a){var b=0,c=d.call(arguments),e=c.length,f=1!==e||a&&m.isFunction(a.promise)?e:0,g=1===f?a:m.Deferred(),h=function(a,b,c){return function(e){b[a]=this,c[a]=arguments.length>1?d.call(arguments):e,c===i?g.notifyWith(b,c):--f||g.resolveWith(b,c)}},i,j,k;if(e>1)for(i=new Array(e),j=new Array(e),k=new Array(e);e>b;b++)c[b]&&m.isFunction(c[b].promise)?c[b].promise().done(h(b,k,c)).fail(g.reject).progress(h(b,j,i)):--f;return f||g.resolveWith(k,c),g.promise()}});var H;m.fn.ready=function(a){return m.ready.promise().done(a),this},m.extend({isReady:!1,readyWait:1,holdReady:function(a){a?m.readyWait++:m.ready(!0)},ready:function(a){if(a===!0?!--m.readyWait:!m.isReady){if(!y.body)return setTimeout(m.ready);m.isReady=!0,a!==!0&&--m.readyWait>0||(H.resolveWith(y,[m]),m.fn.triggerHandler&&(m(y).triggerHandler("ready"),m(y).off("ready")))}}});function I(){y.addEventListener?(y.removeEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",J,!1),a.removeEventListener("load",J,!1)):(y.detachEvent("onreadystatechange",J),a.detachEvent("onload",J))}function J(){(y.addEventListener||"load"===event.type||"complete"===y.readyState)&&(I(),m.ready())}m.ready.promise=function(b){if(!H)if(H=m.Deferred(),"complete"===y.readyState)setTimeout(m.ready);else if(y.addEventListener)y.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",J,!1),a.addEventListener("load",J,!1);else{y.attachEvent("onreadystatechange",J),a.attachEvent("onload",J);var c=!1;try{c=null==a.frameElement&&y.documentElement}catch(d){}c&&c.doScroll&&!function e(){if(!m.isReady){try{c.doScroll("left")}catch(a){return setTimeout(e,50)}I(),m.ready()}}()}return H.promise(b)};var K="undefined",L;for(L in m(k))break;k.ownLast="0"!==L,k.inlineBlockNeedsLayout=!1,m(function(){var a,b,c,d;c=y.getElementsByTagName("body")[0],c&&c.style&&(b=y.createElement("div"),d=y.createElement("div"),d.style.cssText="position:absolute;border:0;width:0;height:0;top:0;left:-9999px",c.appendChild(d).appendChild(b),typeof b.style.zoom!==K&&(b.style.cssText="display:inline;margin:0;border:0;padding:1px;width:1px;zoom:1",k.inlineBlockNeedsLayout=a=3===b.offsetWidth,a&&(c.style.zoom=1)),c.removeChild(d))}),function(){var a=y.createElement("div");if(null==k.deleteExpando){k.deleteExpando=!0;try{delete a.test}catch(b){k.deleteExpando=!1}}a=null}(),m.acceptData=function(a){var b=m.noData[(a.nodeName+" ").toLowerCase()],c=+a.nodeType||1;return 1!==c&&9!==c?!1:!b||b!==!0&&a.getAttribute("classid")===b};var M=/^(?:\{[\w\W]*\}|\[[\w\W]*\])$/,N=/([A-Z])/g;function O(a,b,c){if(void 0===c&&1===a.nodeType){var d="data-"+b.replace(N,"-$1").toLowerCase();if(c=a.getAttribute(d),"string"==typeof c){try{c="true"===c?!0:"false"===c?!1:"null"===c?null:+c+""===c?+c:M.test(c)?m.parseJSON(c):c}catch(e){}m.data(a,b,c)}else c=void 0}return c}function P(a){var b;for(b in a)if(("data"!==b||!m.isEmptyObject(a[b]))&&"toJSON"!==b)return!1;return!0}function Q(a,b,d,e){if(m.acceptData(a)){var f,g,h=m.expando,i=a.nodeType,j=i?m.cache:a,k=i?a[h]:a[h]&&h; +if(k&&j[k]&&(e||j[k].data)||void 0!==d||"string"!=typeof b)return k||(k=i?a[h]=c.pop()||m.guid++:h),j[k]||(j[k]=i?{}:{toJSON:m.noop}),("object"==typeof b||"function"==typeof b)&&(e?j[k]=m.extend(j[k],b):j[k].data=m.extend(j[k].data,b)),g=j[k],e||(g.data||(g.data={}),g=g.data),void 0!==d&&(g[m.camelCase(b)]=d),"string"==typeof b?(f=g[b],null==f&&(f=g[m.camelCase(b)])):f=g,f}}function R(a,b,c){if(m.acceptData(a)){var d,e,f=a.nodeType,g=f?m.cache:a,h=f?a[m.expando]:m.expando;if(g[h]){if(b&&(d=c?g[h]:g[h].data)){m.isArray(b)?b=b.concat(m.map(b,m.camelCase)):b in d?b=[b]:(b=m.camelCase(b),b=b in d?[b]:b.split(" ")),e=b.length;while(e--)delete d[b[e]];if(c?!P(d):!m.isEmptyObject(d))return}(c||(delete g[h].data,P(g[h])))&&(f?m.cleanData([a],!0):k.deleteExpando||g!=g.window?delete g[h]:g[h]=null)}}}m.extend({cache:{},noData:{"applet ":!0,"embed ":!0,"object ":"clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"},hasData:function(a){return a=a.nodeType?m.cache[a[m.expando]]:a[m.expando],!!a&&!P(a)},data:function(a,b,c){return Q(a,b,c)},removeData:function(a,b){return R(a,b)},_data:function(a,b,c){return Q(a,b,c,!0)},_removeData:function(a,b){return R(a,b,!0)}}),m.fn.extend({data:function(a,b){var c,d,e,f=this[0],g=f&&f.attributes;if(void 0===a){if(this.length&&(e=m.data(f),1===f.nodeType&&!m._data(f,"parsedAttrs"))){c=g.length;while(c--)g[c]&&(d=g[c].name,0===d.indexOf("data-")&&(d=m.camelCase(d.slice(5)),O(f,d,e[d])));m._data(f,"parsedAttrs",!0)}return e}return"object"==typeof a?this.each(function(){m.data(this,a)}):arguments.length>1?this.each(function(){m.data(this,a,b)}):f?O(f,a,m.data(f,a)):void 0},removeData:function(a){return this.each(function(){m.removeData(this,a)})}}),m.extend({queue:function(a,b,c){var d;return a?(b=(b||"fx")+"queue",d=m._data(a,b),c&&(!d||m.isArray(c)?d=m._data(a,b,m.makeArray(c)):d.push(c)),d||[]):void 0},dequeue:function(a,b){b=b||"fx";var c=m.queue(a,b),d=c.length,e=c.shift(),f=m._queueHooks(a,b),g=function(){m.dequeue(a,b)};"inprogress"===e&&(e=c.shift(),d--),e&&("fx"===b&&c.unshift("inprogress"),delete f.stop,e.call(a,g,f)),!d&&f&&f.empty.fire()},_queueHooks:function(a,b){var c=b+"queueHooks";return m._data(a,c)||m._data(a,c,{empty:m.Callbacks("once memory").add(function(){m._removeData(a,b+"queue"),m._removeData(a,c)})})}}),m.fn.extend({queue:function(a,b){var c=2;return"string"!=typeof a&&(b=a,a="fx",c--),arguments.lengthh;h++)b(a[h],c,g?d:d.call(a[h],h,b(a[h],c)));return e?a:j?b.call(a):i?b(a[0],c):f},W=/^(?:checkbox|radio)$/i;!function(){var a=y.createElement("input"),b=y.createElement("div"),c=y.createDocumentFragment();if(b.innerHTML="
a",k.leadingWhitespace=3===b.firstChild.nodeType,k.tbody=!b.getElementsByTagName("tbody").length,k.htmlSerialize=!!b.getElementsByTagName("link").length,k.html5Clone="<:nav>"!==y.createElement("nav").cloneNode(!0).outerHTML,a.type="checkbox",a.checked=!0,c.appendChild(a),k.appendChecked=a.checked,b.innerHTML="",k.noCloneChecked=!!b.cloneNode(!0).lastChild.defaultValue,c.appendChild(b),b.innerHTML="",k.checkClone=b.cloneNode(!0).cloneNode(!0).lastChild.checked,k.noCloneEvent=!0,b.attachEvent&&(b.attachEvent("onclick",function(){k.noCloneEvent=!1}),b.cloneNode(!0).click()),null==k.deleteExpando){k.deleteExpando=!0;try{delete b.test}catch(d){k.deleteExpando=!1}}}(),function(){var b,c,d=y.createElement("div");for(b in{submit:!0,change:!0,focusin:!0})c="on"+b,(k[b+"Bubbles"]=c in a)||(d.setAttribute(c,"t"),k[b+"Bubbles"]=d.attributes[c].expando===!1);d=null}();var X=/^(?:input|select|textarea)$/i,Y=/^key/,Z=/^(?:mouse|pointer|contextmenu)|click/,$=/^(?:focusinfocus|focusoutblur)$/,_=/^([^.]*)(?:\.(.+)|)$/;function ab(){return!0}function bb(){return!1}function cb(){try{return y.activeElement}catch(a){}}m.event={global:{},add:function(a,b,c,d,e){var f,g,h,i,j,k,l,n,o,p,q,r=m._data(a);if(r){c.handler&&(i=c,c=i.handler,e=i.selector),c.guid||(c.guid=m.guid++),(g=r.events)||(g=r.events={}),(k=r.handle)||(k=r.handle=function(a){return typeof m===K||a&&m.event.triggered===a.type?void 0:m.event.dispatch.apply(k.elem,arguments)},k.elem=a),b=(b||"").match(E)||[""],h=b.length;while(h--)f=_.exec(b[h])||[],o=q=f[1],p=(f[2]||"").split(".").sort(),o&&(j=m.event.special[o]||{},o=(e?j.delegateType:j.bindType)||o,j=m.event.special[o]||{},l=m.extend({type:o,origType:q,data:d,handler:c,guid:c.guid,selector:e,needsContext:e&&m.expr.match.needsContext.test(e),namespace:p.join(".")},i),(n=g[o])||(n=g[o]=[],n.delegateCount=0,j.setup&&j.setup.call(a,d,p,k)!==!1||(a.addEventListener?a.addEventListener(o,k,!1):a.attachEvent&&a.attachEvent("on"+o,k))),j.add&&(j.add.call(a,l),l.handler.guid||(l.handler.guid=c.guid)),e?n.splice(n.delegateCount++,0,l):n.push(l),m.event.global[o]=!0);a=null}},remove:function(a,b,c,d,e){var f,g,h,i,j,k,l,n,o,p,q,r=m.hasData(a)&&m._data(a);if(r&&(k=r.events)){b=(b||"").match(E)||[""],j=b.length;while(j--)if(h=_.exec(b[j])||[],o=q=h[1],p=(h[2]||"").split(".").sort(),o){l=m.event.special[o]||{},o=(d?l.delegateType:l.bindType)||o,n=k[o]||[],h=h[2]&&new RegExp("(^|\\.)"+p.join("\\.(?:.*\\.|)")+"(\\.|$)"),i=f=n.length;while(f--)g=n[f],!e&&q!==g.origType||c&&c.guid!==g.guid||h&&!h.test(g.namespace)||d&&d!==g.selector&&("**"!==d||!g.selector)||(n.splice(f,1),g.selector&&n.delegateCount--,l.remove&&l.remove.call(a,g));i&&!n.length&&(l.teardown&&l.teardown.call(a,p,r.handle)!==!1||m.removeEvent(a,o,r.handle),delete k[o])}else for(o in k)m.event.remove(a,o+b[j],c,d,!0);m.isEmptyObject(k)&&(delete r.handle,m._removeData(a,"events"))}},trigger:function(b,c,d,e){var f,g,h,i,k,l,n,o=[d||y],p=j.call(b,"type")?b.type:b,q=j.call(b,"namespace")?b.namespace.split("."):[];if(h=l=d=d||y,3!==d.nodeType&&8!==d.nodeType&&!$.test(p+m.event.triggered)&&(p.indexOf(".")>=0&&(q=p.split("."),p=q.shift(),q.sort()),g=p.indexOf(":")<0&&"on"+p,b=b[m.expando]?b:new m.Event(p,"object"==typeof b&&b),b.isTrigger=e?2:3,b.namespace=q.join("."),b.namespace_re=b.namespace?new RegExp("(^|\\.)"+q.join("\\.(?:.*\\.|)")+"(\\.|$)"):null,b.result=void 0,b.target||(b.target=d),c=null==c?[b]:m.makeArray(c,[b]),k=m.event.special[p]||{},e||!k.trigger||k.trigger.apply(d,c)!==!1)){if(!e&&!k.noBubble&&!m.isWindow(d)){for(i=k.delegateType||p,$.test(i+p)||(h=h.parentNode);h;h=h.parentNode)o.push(h),l=h;l===(d.ownerDocument||y)&&o.push(l.defaultView||l.parentWindow||a)}n=0;while((h=o[n++])&&!b.isPropagationStopped())b.type=n>1?i:k.bindType||p,f=(m._data(h,"events")||{})[b.type]&&m._data(h,"handle"),f&&f.apply(h,c),f=g&&h[g],f&&f.apply&&m.acceptData(h)&&(b.result=f.apply(h,c),b.result===!1&&b.preventDefault());if(b.type=p,!e&&!b.isDefaultPrevented()&&(!k._default||k._default.apply(o.pop(),c)===!1)&&m.acceptData(d)&&g&&d[p]&&!m.isWindow(d)){l=d[g],l&&(d[g]=null),m.event.triggered=p;try{d[p]()}catch(r){}m.event.triggered=void 0,l&&(d[g]=l)}return b.result}},dispatch:function(a){a=m.event.fix(a);var b,c,e,f,g,h=[],i=d.call(arguments),j=(m._data(this,"events")||{})[a.type]||[],k=m.event.special[a.type]||{};if(i[0]=a,a.delegateTarget=this,!k.preDispatch||k.preDispatch.call(this,a)!==!1){h=m.event.handlers.call(this,a,j),b=0;while((f=h[b++])&&!a.isPropagationStopped()){a.currentTarget=f.elem,g=0;while((e=f.handlers[g++])&&!a.isImmediatePropagationStopped())(!a.namespace_re||a.namespace_re.test(e.namespace))&&(a.handleObj=e,a.data=e.data,c=((m.event.special[e.origType]||{}).handle||e.handler).apply(f.elem,i),void 0!==c&&(a.result=c)===!1&&(a.preventDefault(),a.stopPropagation()))}return k.postDispatch&&k.postDispatch.call(this,a),a.result}},handlers:function(a,b){var c,d,e,f,g=[],h=b.delegateCount,i=a.target;if(h&&i.nodeType&&(!a.button||"click"!==a.type))for(;i!=this;i=i.parentNode||this)if(1===i.nodeType&&(i.disabled!==!0||"click"!==a.type)){for(e=[],f=0;h>f;f++)d=b[f],c=d.selector+" ",void 0===e[c]&&(e[c]=d.needsContext?m(c,this).index(i)>=0:m.find(c,this,null,[i]).length),e[c]&&e.push(d);e.length&&g.push({elem:i,handlers:e})}return h]","i"),hb=/^\s+/,ib=/<(?!area|br|col|embed|hr|img|input|link|meta|param)(([\w:]+)[^>]*)\/>/gi,jb=/<([\w:]+)/,kb=/\s*$/g,rb={option:[1,""],legend:[1,"
","
"],area:[1,"",""],param:[1,"",""],thead:[1,"","
"],tr:[2,"","
"],col:[2,"","
"],td:[3,"","
"],_default:k.htmlSerialize?[0,"",""]:[1,"X
","
"]},sb=db(y),tb=sb.appendChild(y.createElement("div"));rb.optgroup=rb.option,rb.tbody=rb.tfoot=rb.colgroup=rb.caption=rb.thead,rb.th=rb.td;function ub(a,b){var c,d,e=0,f=typeof a.getElementsByTagName!==K?a.getElementsByTagName(b||"*"):typeof a.querySelectorAll!==K?a.querySelectorAll(b||"*"):void 0;if(!f)for(f=[],c=a.childNodes||a;null!=(d=c[e]);e++)!b||m.nodeName(d,b)?f.push(d):m.merge(f,ub(d,b));return void 0===b||b&&m.nodeName(a,b)?m.merge([a],f):f}function vb(a){W.test(a.type)&&(a.defaultChecked=a.checked)}function wb(a,b){return m.nodeName(a,"table")&&m.nodeName(11!==b.nodeType?b:b.firstChild,"tr")?a.getElementsByTagName("tbody")[0]||a.appendChild(a.ownerDocument.createElement("tbody")):a}function xb(a){return a.type=(null!==m.find.attr(a,"type"))+"/"+a.type,a}function yb(a){var b=pb.exec(a.type);return b?a.type=b[1]:a.removeAttribute("type"),a}function zb(a,b){for(var c,d=0;null!=(c=a[d]);d++)m._data(c,"globalEval",!b||m._data(b[d],"globalEval"))}function Ab(a,b){if(1===b.nodeType&&m.hasData(a)){var c,d,e,f=m._data(a),g=m._data(b,f),h=f.events;if(h){delete g.handle,g.events={};for(c in h)for(d=0,e=h[c].length;e>d;d++)m.event.add(b,c,h[c][d])}g.data&&(g.data=m.extend({},g.data))}}function Bb(a,b){var c,d,e;if(1===b.nodeType){if(c=b.nodeName.toLowerCase(),!k.noCloneEvent&&b[m.expando]){e=m._data(b);for(d in e.events)m.removeEvent(b,d,e.handle);b.removeAttribute(m.expando)}"script"===c&&b.text!==a.text?(xb(b).text=a.text,yb(b)):"object"===c?(b.parentNode&&(b.outerHTML=a.outerHTML),k.html5Clone&&a.innerHTML&&!m.trim(b.innerHTML)&&(b.innerHTML=a.innerHTML)):"input"===c&&W.test(a.type)?(b.defaultChecked=b.checked=a.checked,b.value!==a.value&&(b.value=a.value)):"option"===c?b.defaultSelected=b.selected=a.defaultSelected:("input"===c||"textarea"===c)&&(b.defaultValue=a.defaultValue)}}m.extend({clone:function(a,b,c){var d,e,f,g,h,i=m.contains(a.ownerDocument,a);if(k.html5Clone||m.isXMLDoc(a)||!gb.test("<"+a.nodeName+">")?f=a.cloneNode(!0):(tb.innerHTML=a.outerHTML,tb.removeChild(f=tb.firstChild)),!(k.noCloneEvent&&k.noCloneChecked||1!==a.nodeType&&11!==a.nodeType||m.isXMLDoc(a)))for(d=ub(f),h=ub(a),g=0;null!=(e=h[g]);++g)d[g]&&Bb(e,d[g]);if(b)if(c)for(h=h||ub(a),d=d||ub(f),g=0;null!=(e=h[g]);g++)Ab(e,d[g]);else Ab(a,f);return d=ub(f,"script"),d.length>0&&zb(d,!i&&ub(a,"script")),d=h=e=null,f},buildFragment:function(a,b,c,d){for(var e,f,g,h,i,j,l,n=a.length,o=db(b),p=[],q=0;n>q;q++)if(f=a[q],f||0===f)if("object"===m.type(f))m.merge(p,f.nodeType?[f]:f);else if(lb.test(f)){h=h||o.appendChild(b.createElement("div")),i=(jb.exec(f)||["",""])[1].toLowerCase(),l=rb[i]||rb._default,h.innerHTML=l[1]+f.replace(ib,"<$1>")+l[2],e=l[0];while(e--)h=h.lastChild;if(!k.leadingWhitespace&&hb.test(f)&&p.push(b.createTextNode(hb.exec(f)[0])),!k.tbody){f="table"!==i||kb.test(f)?""!==l[1]||kb.test(f)?0:h:h.firstChild,e=f&&f.childNodes.length;while(e--)m.nodeName(j=f.childNodes[e],"tbody")&&!j.childNodes.length&&f.removeChild(j)}m.merge(p,h.childNodes),h.textContent="";while(h.firstChild)h.removeChild(h.firstChild);h=o.lastChild}else p.push(b.createTextNode(f));h&&o.removeChild(h),k.appendChecked||m.grep(ub(p,"input"),vb),q=0;while(f=p[q++])if((!d||-1===m.inArray(f,d))&&(g=m.contains(f.ownerDocument,f),h=ub(o.appendChild(f),"script"),g&&zb(h),c)){e=0;while(f=h[e++])ob.test(f.type||"")&&c.push(f)}return h=null,o},cleanData:function(a,b){for(var d,e,f,g,h=0,i=m.expando,j=m.cache,l=k.deleteExpando,n=m.event.special;null!=(d=a[h]);h++)if((b||m.acceptData(d))&&(f=d[i],g=f&&j[f])){if(g.events)for(e in g.events)n[e]?m.event.remove(d,e):m.removeEvent(d,e,g.handle);j[f]&&(delete j[f],l?delete d[i]:typeof d.removeAttribute!==K?d.removeAttribute(i):d[i]=null,c.push(f))}}}),m.fn.extend({text:function(a){return V(this,function(a){return void 0===a?m.text(this):this.empty().append((this[0]&&this[0].ownerDocument||y).createTextNode(a))},null,a,arguments.length)},append:function(){return this.domManip(arguments,function(a){if(1===this.nodeType||11===this.nodeType||9===this.nodeType){var b=wb(this,a);b.appendChild(a)}})},prepend:function(){return this.domManip(arguments,function(a){if(1===this.nodeType||11===this.nodeType||9===this.nodeType){var b=wb(this,a);b.insertBefore(a,b.firstChild)}})},before:function(){return this.domManip(arguments,function(a){this.parentNode&&this.parentNode.insertBefore(a,this)})},after:function(){return this.domManip(arguments,function(a){this.parentNode&&this.parentNode.insertBefore(a,this.nextSibling)})},remove:function(a,b){for(var c,d=a?m.filter(a,this):this,e=0;null!=(c=d[e]);e++)b||1!==c.nodeType||m.cleanData(ub(c)),c.parentNode&&(b&&m.contains(c.ownerDocument,c)&&zb(ub(c,"script")),c.parentNode.removeChild(c));return this},empty:function(){for(var a,b=0;null!=(a=this[b]);b++){1===a.nodeType&&m.cleanData(ub(a,!1));while(a.firstChild)a.removeChild(a.firstChild);a.options&&m.nodeName(a,"select")&&(a.options.length=0)}return this},clone:function(a,b){return a=null==a?!1:a,b=null==b?a:b,this.map(function(){return m.clone(this,a,b)})},html:function(a){return V(this,function(a){var b=this[0]||{},c=0,d=this.length;if(void 0===a)return 1===b.nodeType?b.innerHTML.replace(fb,""):void 0;if(!("string"!=typeof a||mb.test(a)||!k.htmlSerialize&&gb.test(a)||!k.leadingWhitespace&&hb.test(a)||rb[(jb.exec(a)||["",""])[1].toLowerCase()])){a=a.replace(ib,"<$1>");try{for(;d>c;c++)b=this[c]||{},1===b.nodeType&&(m.cleanData(ub(b,!1)),b.innerHTML=a);b=0}catch(e){}}b&&this.empty().append(a)},null,a,arguments.length)},replaceWith:function(){var a=arguments[0];return this.domManip(arguments,function(b){a=this.parentNode,m.cleanData(ub(this)),a&&a.replaceChild(b,this)}),a&&(a.length||a.nodeType)?this:this.remove()},detach:function(a){return this.remove(a,!0)},domManip:function(a,b){a=e.apply([],a);var c,d,f,g,h,i,j=0,l=this.length,n=this,o=l-1,p=a[0],q=m.isFunction(p);if(q||l>1&&"string"==typeof p&&!k.checkClone&&nb.test(p))return this.each(function(c){var d=n.eq(c);q&&(a[0]=p.call(this,c,d.html())),d.domManip(a,b)});if(l&&(i=m.buildFragment(a,this[0].ownerDocument,!1,this),c=i.firstChild,1===i.childNodes.length&&(i=c),c)){for(g=m.map(ub(i,"script"),xb),f=g.length;l>j;j++)d=i,j!==o&&(d=m.clone(d,!0,!0),f&&m.merge(g,ub(d,"script"))),b.call(this[j],d,j);if(f)for(h=g[g.length-1].ownerDocument,m.map(g,yb),j=0;f>j;j++)d=g[j],ob.test(d.type||"")&&!m._data(d,"globalEval")&&m.contains(h,d)&&(d.src?m._evalUrl&&m._evalUrl(d.src):m.globalEval((d.text||d.textContent||d.innerHTML||"").replace(qb,"")));i=c=null}return this}}),m.each({appendTo:"append",prependTo:"prepend",insertBefore:"before",insertAfter:"after",replaceAll:"replaceWith"},function(a,b){m.fn[a]=function(a){for(var c,d=0,e=[],g=m(a),h=g.length-1;h>=d;d++)c=d===h?this:this.clone(!0),m(g[d])[b](c),f.apply(e,c.get());return this.pushStack(e)}});var Cb,Db={};function Eb(b,c){var d,e=m(c.createElement(b)).appendTo(c.body),f=a.getDefaultComputedStyle&&(d=a.getDefaultComputedStyle(e[0]))?d.display:m.css(e[0],"display");return e.detach(),f}function Fb(a){var b=y,c=Db[a];return c||(c=Eb(a,b),"none"!==c&&c||(Cb=(Cb||m("