XCM builder pattern improvement - Accept impl Into<T> instead of just T

polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm/src/tests/mod.rs

@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ fn claim_assets_works() {
 	new_test_ext_with_balances(balances).execute_with(|| {
 		// First trap some assets.
 		let trapping_program = Xcm::<RuntimeCall>::builder_unsafe()
-			.withdraw_asset((Here, SEND_AMOUNT).into())
+			.withdraw_asset((Here, SEND_AMOUNT))
 			.build();
 		// Even though assets are trapped, the extrinsic returns success.
 		assert_ok!(XcmPallet::execute_blob(

polkadot/xcm/procedural/src/builder_pattern.rs

@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ fn generate_builder_raw_impl(name: &Ident, data_enum: &DataEnum) -> TokenStream2
 					.collect();
 				let arg_types: Vec<_> = fields.unnamed.iter().map(|field| &field.ty).collect();
 				quote! {
-					pub fn #method_name(mut self, #(#arg_names: #arg_types),*) -> Self {
+					pub fn #method_name(mut self, #(#arg_names: impl Into<#arg_types>),*) -> Self {
+						#(let #arg_names = #arg_names.into();)*
 						self.instructions.push(#name::<Call>::#variant_name(#(#arg_names),*));
 						self
 					}
@@ -117,7 +118,8 @@ fn generate_builder_raw_impl(name: &Ident, data_enum: &DataEnum) -> TokenStream2
 				let arg_names: Vec<_> = fields.named.iter().map(|field| &field.ident).collect();
 				let arg_types: Vec<_> = fields.named.iter().map(|field| &field.ty).collect();
 				quote! {
-					pub fn #method_name(mut self, #(#arg_names: #arg_types),*) -> Self {
+					pub fn #method_name(mut self, #(#arg_names: impl Into<#arg_types>),*) -> Self {
+						#(let #arg_names = #arg_names.into();)*
 						self.instructions.push(#name::<Call>::#variant_name { #(#arg_names),* });
 						self
 					}
@@ -188,8 +190,9 @@ fn generate_builder_impl(name: &Ident, data_enum: &DataEnum) -> Result<TokenStre
 					let arg_types: Vec<_> = fields.unnamed.iter().map(|field| &field.ty).collect();
 					quote! {
 						#(#docs)*
-						pub fn #method_name(self, #(#arg_names: #arg_types),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, LoadedHolding> {
+						pub fn #method_name(self, #(#arg_names: impl Into<#arg_types>),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, LoadedHolding> {
 							let mut new_instructions = self.instructions;
+							#(let #arg_names = #arg_names.into();)*
 							new_instructions.push(#name::<Call>::#variant_name(#(#arg_names),*));
 							XcmBuilder {
 								instructions: new_instructions,
@@ -203,8 +206,9 @@ fn generate_builder_impl(name: &Ident, data_enum: &DataEnum) -> Result<TokenStre
 					let arg_types: Vec<_> = fields.named.iter().map(|field| &field.ty).collect();
 					quote! {
 						#(#docs)*
-						pub fn #method_name(self, #(#arg_names: #arg_types),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, LoadedHolding> {
+						pub fn #method_name(self, #(#arg_names: impl Into<#arg_types>),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, LoadedHolding> {
 							let mut new_instructions = self.instructions;
+							#(let #arg_names = #arg_names.into();)*
 							new_instructions.push(#name::<Call>::#variant_name { #(#arg_names),* });
 							XcmBuilder {
 								instructions: new_instructions,
@@ -249,8 +253,9 @@ fn generate_builder_impl(name: &Ident, data_enum: &DataEnum) -> Result<TokenStre
 							fields.named.iter().map(|field| &field.ty).collect();
 						quote! {
 							#(#docs)*
-							pub fn #method_name(self, #(#arg_names: #arg_types),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, AnythingGoes> {
+							pub fn #method_name(self, #(#arg_names: impl Into<#arg_types>),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, AnythingGoes> {
 								let mut new_instructions = self.instructions;
+								#(let #arg_names = #arg_names.into();)*
 								new_instructions.push(#name::<Call>::#variant_name { #(#arg_names),* });
 								XcmBuilder {
 									instructions: new_instructions,
@@ -308,8 +313,9 @@ fn generate_builder_unpaid_impl(name: &Ident, data_enum: &DataEnum) -> Result<To
 	Ok(quote! {
 		impl<Call> XcmBuilder<Call, ExplicitUnpaidRequired> {
 			#(#docs)*
-			pub fn #unpaid_execution_method_name(self, #(#arg_names: #arg_types),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, AnythingGoes> {
+			pub fn #unpaid_execution_method_name(self, #(#arg_names: impl Into<#arg_types>),*) -> XcmBuilder<Call, AnythingGoes> {
 				let mut new_instructions = self.instructions;
+				#(let #arg_names = #arg_names.into();)*
 				new_instructions.push(#name::<Call>::#unpaid_execution_ident { #(#arg_names),* });
 				XcmBuilder {
 					instructions: new_instructions,

polkadot/xcm/procedural/tests/builder_pattern.rs

@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ use xcm::latest::prelude::*;
 #[test]
 fn builder_pattern_works() {
 	let asset: Asset = (Here, 100u128).into();
-	let beneficiary: Location = AccountId32 { id: [0u8; 32], network: None }.into();
+	let beneficiary: Location = [0u8; 32].into();
 	let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder()
-		.receive_teleported_asset(asset.clone().into())
+		.receive_teleported_asset(asset.clone())
 		.buy_execution(asset.clone(), Unlimited)
-		.deposit_asset(asset.clone().into(), beneficiary.clone())
+		.deposit_asset(asset.clone(), beneficiary.clone())
 		.build();
 	assert_eq!(
 		message,
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ fn default_builder_requires_buy_execution() {
 	// To be able to do that, we need to use the explicitly unpaid variant
 	let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unpaid()
 		.unpaid_execution(Unlimited, None)
-		.withdraw_asset(asset.clone().into())
-		.deposit_asset(asset.clone().into(), beneficiary.clone())
+		.withdraw_asset(asset.clone())
+		.deposit_asset(asset.clone(), beneficiary.clone())
 		.build(); // This works
 	assert_eq!(
 		message,
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ fn default_builder_requires_buy_execution() {
 	// The other option doesn't have any limits whatsoever, so it should
 	// only be used when you really know what you're doing.
 	let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unsafe()
-		.withdraw_asset(asset.clone().into())
-		.deposit_asset(asset.clone().into(), beneficiary.clone())
+		.withdraw_asset(asset.clone())
+		.deposit_asset(asset.clone(), beneficiary.clone())
 		.build();
 	assert_eq!(
 		message,

polkadot/xcm/src/v4/location.rs

@@ -530,6 +530,13 @@ impl<Interior: Into<Junctions>> From<AncestorThen<Interior>> for Location {
 	}
 }
 
+impl From<[u8; 32]> for Location {
+	fn from(bytes: [u8; 32]) -> Self {
+		let junction: Junction = bytes.into();
+		junction.into()
+	}
+}
+
 xcm_procedural::impl_conversion_functions_for_location_v4!();
 
 #[cfg(test)]

prdoc/pr_3708.prdoc

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Schema: Polkadot SDK PRDoc Schema (prdoc) v1.0.0
+# See doc at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/master/prdoc/schema_user.json
+
+title: XCM builder pattern automatically converts instruction parameters.
+
+doc:
+  - audience: Runtime Dev
+    description: |
+      Small quality of life improvement.
+      Previously, an XCM could be built like this:
+      ```rust
+      let xcm = Xcm::builder()
+          .withdraw_asset((Parent, 100u128).into())
+          .buy_execution((Parent, 1u128).into())
+          .deposit_asset(All.into(), AccountId32 { id: [0u8; 32], network: None }.into())
+          .build();
+      ```
+      Now, it can be built like this:
+      ```rust
+      let xcm = Xcm::builder()
+          .withdraw_asset((Parent, 100u128))
+          .buy_execution((Parent, 1u128))
+          .deposit_asset(All, [0u8; 32])
+          .build();
+      ```
+
+crates:
+- name: "xcm-procedural"
+- name: "staging-xcm"