Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make PEX_PATH unify pex sources, as well as requirements. #329

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2016

Conversation

benjyw
Copy link
Collaborator

@benjyw benjyw commented Dec 8, 2016

No description provided.

@benjyw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

benjyw commented Dec 8, 2016

Addresses #317

@benjyw benjyw assigned benjyw and kwlzn and unassigned benjyw Dec 8, 2016
@benjyw benjyw requested a review from kwlzn December 8, 2016 00:05
Copy link
Contributor

@kwlzn kwlzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! one suggestion.

:param coverage: include coverage header
"""
dists = dists or []
sources = sources or []

def makedirs(d):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about using pex.common.safe_mkdir() instead, which essentially does the same thing?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

D'oh! Meant to change that once I noticed safe_mkdir, but forgot. Done.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PTAL :)

Copy link
Contributor

@kwlzn kwlzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@benjyw benjyw merged commit 96e27a0 into master Dec 8, 2016
@benjyw benjyw deleted the pex_path_sources branch December 8, 2016 03:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants