-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Categoricals with NaNs #3678
Comments
their labels become |
yes |
right now, you can use @jseabold is that enough? Or do you need an explicit "use NaN as a level" keyword? |
@JanSchulz I think this is a bug actually. When you construct this |
I have a fix in #7768, but this doesn't work yet:
|
The describe call also still fails... I investigate... |
describe is fixed as well: jankatins@1334684 |
all three issues should be done in #7768 . If one wants to have np.nan in levels, one would have to specify the levels: |
Not sure how to handle this yet. It looks like NaNs do not become a level. Should they? Maybe so. Also describe fails if NaNs are present.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: