-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Low alignment rate #472
Comments
What fraction of your STAR alignments is intergenic or overlapping introns? |
I used the following command to count reads aligned to the reference transcriptome by STAR, then subtracted it from the total read number. The result indicates that 52.96% of the reads were not derived from exons. Does this imply that the alignment rate is relatively low due to a significant proportion of reads originating from non-exonic regions? |
I would assume so. Kallisto usually (pseudo)aligns to annotated spliced transcripts only. So your comparison to STAR is not really apples to apples. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The original literature indicates that it is a standard single-cell RNA-seq library. |
Hi,
I quantified a paired-end Smart-seq2 RNA-Seq dataset (SRR3936136) using kallisto v0.48.0 with the GENCODE v47 transcriptome. The fragment length was calculated by CollectInsertSizeMetrics (Picard) based on STAR bam. The alignment rate was 34.2% in paired-end mode and 45.6%/43.6% in single-end mode, compared to 74.93% obtained with STAR. I wonder why there is notable discrepancy in the alignment rate. The corresponding information is provided below.
kallisto pair-end run_info.json:
kallisto single-end run_info.json:
STAR Log.final.out
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: