[Web] Rename "Quicklink" to "link"

[tbsbdr]

Steps to reproduce

1. Rightclick on a resource
2. Select "Copy Quicklink"
3. I received feedback that "Quicklink" is an unexpected wording which makes users think.

Expected behaviour

• Wording that does not make users think (meet users expectations)
• Generally rename Quicklink to link --> Copy link

1. Context menu: Rename to "Copy link"
2. Tooltip: Rename to "Copy link"
3. Form label: Rename to "Link"
4. Action: Rename to "Add another link"
5. Seperator: Set color to --oc-color-input-border to increase visibility of the separator-line

Actual behaviour

• wording makes users think

[tbsbdr]

@kulmann as seeing it now in the UI, I'd prefer to call it just "copy link" and "Link" in the sidebar. I suggest to push the link just as "The link" - everything else is "Advanced usecase" and should not disturb regular users-usecase.

Ok like this, @kulmann ?

CC @dragotin 

--

Note: The multiple links should be hidden per default in the future; made visible ex. via "Advanced view"-switch like you know it from your FritzBox and some other applications.

[kulmann]

I like the simple Link and Copy link as well.

Still thinking about the action below, which is currently labelled Add link. I think making it more clear that this is not the submit action for creating the link above would be helpful. What do you think about e.g. Add more links? Can you think of alternatives?

[dragotin]

I think @tbsbdr and me also considered the term Standardlink, as it makes it clear which link (out of the multiple) that is, but I like only Link as well.
I very much like to switch to Add more links.

[tbsbdr]

Regarding the "Add more link" issue:

I understand you say that the "Add link" action gives the impression to belog to the link above (which is wrong).

Correct @dragotin @kulmann ? 

[kulmann]

Regarding the "Add more link" issue:

I understand you say that the "Add link" action gives the impression to belog to the link above (which is wrong).

Correct @dragotin @kulmann ? 

Yep, that's the issue I see 👍🏻

[tbsbdr]

• As discussed with benedikt, lets go with link
• updated initial comment.

[tbsbdr]

Classified as Prio2 as I again observed that the wording Quicklink leads to confusion. Potential to cause even internal failures due to misunderstandings.