Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WG Charter updates #52

Closed
SecurityCRob opened this issue Mar 9, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

WG Charter updates #52

SecurityCRob opened this issue Mar 9, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@SecurityCRob
Copy link

Hi. The OSSF TAC is seeking to get an issue(1) closed out. We want to ensure all working groups have a complete charter.md file and as I reviewed this group's file I noticed that this WG does not have a charter in place. The Tooling WG has the best example of what we'd like to see(2), it can be copied and adjusted for this WG. Can you please make a copy, review with the WG, adjust as needed, and post it into your repo? Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

(1) - ossf/tac#9
(2) - https://github.com/ossf/wg-security-tooling/blob/main/CHARTER.md

@jeffmendoza
Copy link
Member

jeffmendoza commented Apr 7, 2022

Upstream issue needs to be resolved: ossf/wg-securing-software-repos#4

@jeffmendoza
Copy link
Member

ossf/project-template#4

@jeffmendoza
Copy link
Member

After discussion in the WG meeting today. We will wait for further wordsmithing on the template (linked above). Then we'll customize it with a pointer to our goal (https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-critical-projects#focus) and leads (co-chairs).

@christo4ferris
Copy link

Seems to me that we are left hanging with the tacit agreement to remove the confusing language, I see no reason that this issue cannot be closed by adopting the current template and updating once the TAC has made the change, or alternatively remove the section as @jchestershopify has done in his fork.

@Amir-Montazery
Copy link
Contributor

Charter has been updated and merged into repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants