Re-license under the MIT + Apache 2.0 license

[orhun]

git-cliff has been re-licensed under MIT + Apache 2.0 license in #165 and git-cliff-action was sitting with GPL-3.0 for a while. So let's re-license it :)

• @orhun
• @M0NsTeRRR
• @aburgel
• @clementnuss
• @Gnyblast
• @mloberg
• @chamini2
• @nhedger

Please leave a comment to this issue stating that you consent to the license change or indicate your objection if you do not agree with the new license terms. For example:

• ✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.
• ❌ I object to the proposed license change and do not consent to my work on git-cliff being licensed under either the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

Thank you for your contributions to the project and your attention to the matter! 🐻

[orhun]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[nhedger]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[Gnyblast]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[M0NsTeRRR]

Of course MIT/Apache > GPL :)

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[aburgel]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[mloberg]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[chamini2]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[clementnuss]

✅ I consent to my work on git-cliff to be licensed under the terms of the MIT or Apache 2.0 license.

[orhun]

Re-licensed in 9f34d77 - thanks everyone for their contribution & attention <3