Reasons for the remote
keyword
#1514
dabrahams
started this conversation in
Language design
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Now I remember!
Is Another thing to consider while we're on the topic is that we need to syntaxes, one for value terms and one for type terms. Otherwise we'll run into the same ambiguities as the one we'd have if tuples terms and types were both spelled with parentheses. Currently we have that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We've forgotten why
remote let
andremote inout
can't just be spelledlet
andinout
in the positions where they are currently allowed. We should retrieve that knowledge or try dropping the keyword. This discussion can record the rationale persistently.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions