Replies: 2 comments
-
Hey @iacchus, thanks for the insights. Yeah, I am aware that the CSS customization is still very limited and hard to accomplish without resorting to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hey @iacchus, I tried to improve the customizability in #158. I hope that helps! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I've spent the last few hours tinkering with the Giscus css and had some insights:
I think if giscus had a mode with the (1.) css framework stripped off which had a (2.) simple skelenton html all namespaced with the
.gsc-
classes and (3.) with a simple base css, I think would encourage people to develop different and beautiful templates with more freedom, only by editing the css.Maybe with a default
.gsc-
classes and something like empty.gsc-custom-
classes with preemptiness in the markup, so that them would override the default ones?For example I am having to add some selectors to edit some things (like
div:nth-child(2)
), to unset framework classes, to add some css's!important
overrides etc.Maybe then we could make a portifolio repository of different themes with images at
github.io
so that people could choose from.These are some suggestions that happened in my mind :), thanks for the software!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions