Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for range-dependent SSP for Bellhop #6

Open
mchitre opened this issue Nov 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Add support for range-dependent SSP for Bellhop #6

mchitre opened this issue Nov 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mchitre
Copy link
Member

mchitre commented Nov 27, 2020

No description provided.

@mchitre mchitre added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2020
@mchitre mchitre self-assigned this Nov 27, 2020
@mchitre
Copy link
Member Author

mchitre commented May 28, 2021

Added for model description and for ray solver. Not yet added for Bellhop.

@mchitre mchitre changed the title Add support for range-dependent SSP Add support for range-dependent SSP for Bellhop May 28, 2021
mchitre referenced this issue in org-arl/UnderwaterAcoustics.jl May 28, 2021
@mchitre
feat(pm): add support for 2d SSP (#15)
c2f374e
@mchitre mchitre mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2021
Closed
@apatlpo
Copy link

apatlpo commented Aug 5, 2021

Just pitching here that this feature would be useful for comparisons with RaySolver in range dependent configurations and more generally for building trust about RaySolver amongst my collaborators.
Do you have a timeline for this?

@mchitre
Copy link
Member Author

mchitre commented Aug 5, 2021

Not hard to do, so if there's a need, this can be implemented in a day or two.

Best to chart out roadmap as planned in org-arl/UnderwaterAcoustics.jl#32, and then prioritize and decide on timelines.

@mchitre mchitre transferred this issue from org-arl/UnderwaterAcoustics.jl Apr 10, 2023
@mchitre mchitre removed their assignment Apr 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mchitre @apatlpo