You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
My idea is still a work in progress so bear with me. At this point from what I have seen, key signing per each peer is how granting access to store data works in OrbitDB. I am hoping to introduce a finer grained level of access. And to do that I was thinking that creating a middleware would be a good option. The idea is that metadata stores could exist to map doc, key/val, etc.. access to different users. With that middleware in place, attempts could be denied/granted based on the metadata store. This is a very rough idea and may not be feasible though with the middleware alone. I may need to also use a 3rd party service(like uPort or Auth0) to handle the storage of this kind of information.
Appreciate any thoughts or direction people in community might have on this topic.
I know that work is being done on the Dynamic Access Controllers. But from my understanding that is access at a store level. I am hoping to make it possible to do it at a lower level.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My idea is still a work in progress so bear with me. At this point from what I have seen, key signing per each peer is how granting access to store data works in OrbitDB. I am hoping to introduce a finer grained level of access. And to do that I was thinking that creating a middleware would be a good option. The idea is that metadata stores could exist to map doc, key/val, etc.. access to different users. With that middleware in place, attempts could be denied/granted based on the metadata store. This is a very rough idea and may not be feasible though with the middleware alone. I may need to also use a 3rd party service(like uPort or Auth0) to handle the storage of this kind of information.
Appreciate any thoughts or direction people in community might have on this topic.
I know that work is being done on the Dynamic Access Controllers. But from my understanding that is access at a store level. I am hoping to make it possible to do it at a lower level.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: