Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

Which OrbitDB is more suitable? #90

Open
dexterchan opened this issue Feb 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Which OrbitDB is more suitable? #90

dexterchan opened this issue Feb 3, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@dexterchan
Copy link

I am opening an use case as documented below:
https://github.com/dexterchan/IPFS_Dist_DB_DEMO/blob/master/IPFS_Usecase.md

in OrbitDb: key store or document store
which one is more suitable?

We would expect a throughput around 20Kb per second.

@aphelionz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @dexterchan, sorry for the delay in replying! All data updates are stored in IPFS as operation log entries and then reduced via state. Your bottlenecks are different each way: for writes you have network throughput and disk IO via IPFS. For reads it will be CPU and ram.

Given that, I don't believe key store and document stores are substantially different. However, this is an old ticket and you may have moved on! Did you build anything? How did it go?

@aphelionz
Copy link
Collaborator

Moving to the Field Manual repo for more discussion

@aphelionz aphelionz transferred this issue from orbitdb/orbitdb Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants