Skip to content

History / Installing Oppia Android

Revisions

  • Fix #5015: Added CI to oppia-android wiki (check toc) (#5382) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation Fixes #5015 This introduces a script to verify that the table of contents in each wiki page corresponds to its headers whenever a wiki change is made, ensuring consistency and correctness in documentation. Note: Ensure any emojis included in the headers are also reflected in the table of contents. ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

    @Rd4dev Rd4dev committed Oct 11, 2024
  • Fix #5370, part of #59: Migrate to Bazel 6.5.0 (#4886) ## Explanation Fixes #5370 Fixes part of #59 This PR updates the project to use Bazel 6.5.0 instead of 4.0.0. Note that most of the changes done so far in addressing #59 are centered around the concept of simplifying the Bazel maintenance as much as possible so that it's not too much more difficult than Gradle by the time we fully remove Gradle support from the project. While Bazel will always require more effort, there are many things that can be done to narrow the gap. This is a major step in that process since Bazel 4.x required using a custom Android toolchain (https://github.com/oppia/oppia-bazel-tools) which is not at all user friendly. Plus, there are many compatibility and performance improvements in later versions of Bazel that we want to be able to incorporate within the broader Oppia Android project. Bazel 6.x was specifically chosen because: - Bazel 4.x was missing support for the new D8 version which made it impossible to upgrade past 29.0.2 build tools https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/13989. - Bazel 5.x had some additional compatibility issues with the D8 change, so we weren't able to use it, either: https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/15957. - Bazel 7.x (which wasn't released when this work was originally done) introduces new bzlmod support that causes some additional build headaches that can be figured out later. - Bazel 6.5.0 specifically was chosen since it's the latest 6.x version (as of this edit) and seems to work correctly with existing unit tests. Some other important details to note: - rules_kotlin 1.7.x is needed at a minimum for Bazel 5.x+ support. However, an additional fix was needed (https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_kotlin/pull/940) in order to fix a deviation in functionality that occurred starting in Bazel 5.x's java_plugin support which led to some file duplication in rules_kotlin (that was fortunately easy to fix). Unfortunately, this change wasn't backported to 1.7.x so this PR makes use of a custom patch to rules_kotlin 1.7.1 (https://github.com/oppia/rules_kotlin) that includes the needed change. We'll get this change properly once we can upgrade to 1.8.x, though that will also require updating Kotlin itself to 1.8.x due to https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_kotlin/issues/1019. - Bazel 6.x (maybe 5.x) requires at least build tools 30.0.0 since it completely removed support for the old D8 compat dexer. 32.0.0 was chosen in this PR as it's simply a newer, more up-to-date build tools (and removes D8 completely). With this upgrade to Bazel 6.x we'll be able to update the build tools version more often (so long as it doesn't introduce AGP incompatibilities since we can't upgrade Gradle). - As of Bazel 6.x, we're able to reenable Java header compilation and incremental dexing, both of which should have _significant_ performance improvements for incremental builds of the app (and in fact we will have build errors if we disable incremental dexing). - In CI, we opted to **not** support build tools 29.0.2 or old builds of the app. Instead, we'll rely on build tools failing for certain PRs as an indicator that those PRs will require an update (once this PR is merged) in order to have CI run correctly. This is a lot easier than trying to figure out how to support before/after changes with some fairly complex environment differences. - There are a bunch of version updates that were needed to support the minimum version of Kotlin for rules 1.7.x (1.6 I think) as well as JDK 11 (which I think was needed for Bazel 5.x), and these have largely been taken care of in previous PRs to this one (though the JDK 11 update in CI was done in this PR, along with wiki documentation updates to address #5370). One such case of a necessary version upgrade: https://github.com/google/dagger/issues/2511. - There was a change needed for the databinding java_plugin declaration to specify that it generates an API (in order for it to be used correctly in builds). - rules_java needed to be updated to support the newer version of Bazel. - The desugaring hack needed for kotlinx-coroutines-core-jvm was removed since it's no longer needed with the build tools & Bazel upgrade introduced in this PR. - This includes one small change in third-party to change all single-export wrappers that don't have additional plugins being enabled to aliases instead. This is more semantically correct as the wrappers may lose information (which caused problems when investigating adding Jetpack Compose support in #5401). While this isn't directly required for the Bazel upgrade, this is the last PR needed for Jetpack Compose support so it's being added here for simplicity. - ``.bazelrc`` was updated to configure tools, tests, and builds to all use the remote JDK 11 available via Bazel rather than ever using the user's local JDK. This should improve build hermeticity and consistency across different user environments (see https://bazel.build/docs/bazel-and-java). - Setup docs were updated to remove setting up JDK 11 (or Java at all for Linux & Mac) now that the user no longer needs to install Java (see previous point) except for Windows. The Python instructions were also removed since Bazel 6.x includes fixes for Android tools that previously depended on Python 2.x. - CI was unchanged for Java setup since, as far as I can tell, it's still needed for sdkmanager. There was also some small cleanup in unit_tests.yml that I noticed when updating CI versions. ## Essential Checklist - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)). ## For UI-specific PRs only N/A -- This is a build infrastructure change. It shouldn't impact the end user experience. --------- Co-authored-by: Adhiambo Peres <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sean Lip <[email protected]>

    @BenHenning BenHenning committed Jun 13, 2024
  • Fix #5214, Fix Part of #1723 : Fix onboarding issue faced by new contributors (#5210) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation Fix #5214 : Wiki link not redirect to correct destination ( good-first-issue link) Fix Part of #1723 : Fix onboarding issue faced by new contributors. 1. Tell contributors firmly to use "Android Studio Bumblebee | 2021.1.1 Patch 3." 2. In the wiki, make sure to mention that you need to have JDK 11 to use oppia-android. 3. Concentrate on using robolectric instead of espresso and provide clear instructions for setting up tests. <!-- - Explain what your PR does. If this PR fixes an existing bug, please include - "Fixes #bugnum:" in the explanation so that GitHub can auto-close the issue - when this PR is merged. --> ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [ ] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

    @MohitGupta121 MohitGupta121 committed Oct 31, 2023
  • Fix #5073, #5062, #5099, and part of #1723: Improve Onboarding Documentation (#5174) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation Fix #5073:  Add instructions to the wiki for how to assign a reviewer. Fix #5062:  Add wiki documentation for how to pick the emulator/android version when running Espresso tests. Fix #5099:  Reorganize the Project Setup Documentation Fix part of #1723: ensure the onboarding flow leads into follow-up documentation: architecture overview, code style, submission guidelines, how to make UX changes, how to contribute large projects (which should tie into design documents), and best practices Fix part of #1723: Known issues that have come up in discussions ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

    @adhiamboperes adhiamboperes committed Oct 9, 2023
  • Update README.md (#5060) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation This Pr makes changes to the redme.md file. <!-- - Explain what your PR does. If this PR fixes an existing bug, please include - "Fixes #bugnum:" in the explanation so that GitHub can auto-close the issue - when this PR is merged. --> ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [ ] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [ ] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [X] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [X] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [ ] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [X] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)). ## For UI-specific PRs only <!-- Delete these section if this PR does not include UI-related changes. --> If your PR includes UI-related changes, then: - Add screenshots for portrait/landscape for both a tablet & phone of the before & after UI changes - For the screenshots above, include both English and pseudo-localized (RTL) screenshots (see [RTL guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/RTL-Guidelines)) - Add a video showing the full UX flow with a screen reader enabled (see [accessibility guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Accessibility-A11y-Guide)) - Add a screenshot demonstrating that you ran affected Espresso tests locally & that they're passing

    @prafulbbandre prafulbbandre committed Jun 19, 2023
  • Fix #4622: Android Wiki migration (#4893) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation <!-- - Explain what your PR does. If this PR fixes an existing bug, please include - "Fixes #bugnum:" in the explanation so that GitHub can auto-close the issue - when this PR is merged. --> - Fixes #4622 - The PR does the following: This PR moves the android wiki into the oppia-andoird codebase allowing contributors to make PRs to the wiki along with changes to the codebase itself. This PR also introduces a GitHub Action (Runs when a PR is merged into develop and when a user makes change to the wiki via the web interface) that copies the content of the wiki folder along with the git history of the wiki folder and deploys it to the oppia-android wiki repository. The steps followed to achieve this wiki migration are present here: [Oppia Android Wiki Migration V2 (1).pdf](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/files/10921370/Oppia.Android.Wiki.Migration.V2.1.pdf) ### Note: Please ensure GitHub actions have write permissions. Please follow these instructions to enable it: [GrantingReadandWritePermissionsonGitHub_PDF.pdf](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/files/10919834/GrantingReadandWritePermissionsonGitHub_PDF.pdf) ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)). ## For UI-specific PRs only <!-- Delete these section if this PR does not include UI-related changes. --> If your PR includes UI-related changes, then: - Add screenshots for portrait/landscape for both a tablet & phone of the before & after UI changes - For the screenshots above, include both English and pseudo-localized (RTL) screenshots (see [RTL guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/RTL-Guidelines)) - Add a video showing the full UX flow with a screen reader enabled (see [accessibility guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Accessibility-(A11y)-Guide)) - Add a screenshot demonstrating that you ran affected Espresso tests locally & that they're passing --------- Co-authored-by: Rajat Talesra <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ben Henning <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Akshay Nandwana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Srikanth K B <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abhay Garg <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Arjun Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sparsh Agrawal <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Farees Hussain <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sarthak Agarwal <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sean Lip <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Apoorv Srivastava <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vinita Murthi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ankita Saxena <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vojtěch Jelínek <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ben Henning <[email protected]>

    @gp201 gp201 committed Mar 17, 2023