You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 3, 2025. It is now read-only.
Currently the CatalogSource controller creates Package resources when reconciling a CatalogSource CR. It doesn't do any special naming logic to ensure uniqueness of Package resources being created which means that if multiple catalogs define a package of the same name (but are technically different), there will be a naming clash resulting in an error creating the corresponding Package resource.
We should evaluate what our options are to prevent this naming clash.
One suggestion is to see what options we have to specify the Package admission criteria on our custom apiserver. For more context see: #1 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is probably not going to be an issue if we configure labels as discussed in #38. Multiple catalogs can include packages with the same name, but clients would have to distinguish between those packages by specifying the catalog they want the package from.
I.e kubectl get catalogmetadata -l package=foo,catalog=bar
Currently the
CatalogSource
controller createsPackage
resources when reconciling aCatalogSource
CR. It doesn't do any special naming logic to ensure uniqueness ofPackage
resources being created which means that if multiple catalogs define a package of the same name (but are technically different), there will be a naming clash resulting in an error creating the correspondingPackage
resource.We should evaluate what our options are to prevent this naming clash.
One suggestion is to see what options we have to specify the
Package
admission criteria on our custom apiserver. For more context see: #1 (comment)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: