You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are reports that fsync performance, as measured by postgresql's pg_test_fsync test, are significantly slower in ZoL compared to FreeBSD 10. The following test results are from the same machine (DELL R720dx 12*4TB SATA) and hardware configuration.
Since the disk isn't saturated for ZoL I suspect that we're blocking longer than needed somewhere in the stack. We'll want to profile the workload to see where.
in CentOS 6.5 x64 yum installed zfs 0.6.3, the result is.
There are reports that fsync performance, as measured by postgresql's
pg_test_fsync
test, are significantly slower in ZoL compared to FreeBSD 10. The following test results are from the same machine (DELL R720dx 12*4TB SATA) and hardware configuration.Since the disk isn't saturated for ZoL I suspect that we're blocking longer than needed somewhere in the stack. We'll want to profile the workload to see where.
in CentOS 6.5 x64 yum installed zfs 0.6.3, the result is.
and disk utils output by iostat is between 20% and 30%
and in FreeBSD 10. iops below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: