Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

thank you! #1

Closed
dylang opened this issue Jul 22, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

thank you! #1

dylang opened this issue Jul 22, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@dylang
Copy link

dylang commented Jul 22, 2014

Not a bug, just a thanks!

I was thinking about building this after being underwhelmed with nopents, but what you built looks way more impressive than what I could have done.

Thank you!

For use in the browser, use browserify.

👍 awesome!

@dylang
Copy link
Author

dylang commented Jul 22, 2014

This is the kind of problem I hope to use opentsdb.js to solve: GoogleChromeLabs/psi#10

@kgryte
Copy link
Contributor

kgryte commented Jul 22, 2014

@dylang Thanks for the comment. I, too, was underwhelmed with the OpenTSDB clients available, which is why I wrote my own.

And yes, totally, OpenTSDB is certainly one possibility for storing application performance metrics. I have also seen OpenTSDB and Elasticsearch integration, which allows for enhanced search. I will be curious to see what you settle on for a final solution.

One drawback currently is that this library is currently read-only. I have yet to implement put requests. This is straightforward and on the roadmap for later this week. Some libraries use the REST interface for saving data in OpenTSDB. This is not performant. If you need to pipe data into OpenTSDB and time is of the essence, be sure to use a library which creates a socket connection and pipes from there. The performance gains are significant.

@kgryte
Copy link
Contributor

kgryte commented Oct 15, 2014

A socket client is now included with the library, thus allowing writing to OpenTSDB. Closing this issue.

@kgryte kgryte closed this as completed Oct 15, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants