-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Power switches preset #4441
Comments
Most of this seems ok..
Let's not do this part ☝️ Switches should always be |
I'm afraid not At least, this is the reviewed tagging |
We can't.. So people should just make 2 nodes - 1 node for the pole, and 1 node just next to the pole for the device. |
This won't match reality A relation involving the line and the pole node may also be created. This will add a lot of complexity to data while power=pole + switch=* makes sense. And there are dozen of objects described like this currently. It takes years to change this |
@octagonal if you want to try this issue, we're looking for a new "Power Switch" preset:
I left out some of the "change details" parts above, but try it and let me know if you need more info! 🙇 |
Hi,
Last year, a proposal was adopted to extend power=switch features on OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_switching_extension
A key switch=* can be used on power=switch objects and take 4 values : disconnector, circuit_breaker, mechanical and earthing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:switch
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dswitch
It may be useful to create a preset for power switches, and ask mappers for following tags
As power=transformer, a switch can also be on top of a pole.
In this case (and only), switch=* will be used with power=pole (and not power=switch)
It may be good to create a specific preset "pole with switch" and ask for same tags than standalone switches.
Since some keys can be used both for pole and switches, some namespaces may be useful :
ref => pole:ref and switch:ref
As a side business, it may be good to add a validation rule to warn about any power=switch without switch key.
Let me know if you have any issue to take care of this
Thanks in advance :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: