You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I noticed that the active fiber force-length curve in OpenSim DegrooteFregly2016Muscle does not match the Millard2012EquilibriumMuscle; the later one is wider, the max force is at optimal fiber force, and it matches the experimental data very well (Link). I'm also familiar with the active_force_width_scale method, but it expands the left side more the the right side.
I engaged in some curve fitting to improve the parameters, and this is the result:
And this is the peak:
As can be seen, the optimized curve matches the Millard curve very well, and the peak value is exactly at the optimal fiber length. I'm sharing the parameters here:
Hi, I noticed that the active fiber force-length curve in OpenSim
DegrooteFregly2016Muscle
does not match theMillard2012EquilibriumMuscle
; the later one is wider, the max force is at optimal fiber force, and it matches the experimental data very well (Link). I'm also familiar with theactive_force_width_scale
method, but it expands the left side more the the right side.I engaged in some curve fitting to improve the parameters, and this is the result:

And this is the peak:

As can be seen, the optimized curve matches the Millard curve very well, and the peak value is exactly at the optimal fiber length. I'm sharing the parameters here:
Hope this helps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: