-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate components that ship separately into their own repos #640
Comments
See opensearch-project/opensearch-build#2188 (comment) in which we decided to split front-end and back-end components. For the SQL plugin there are a lot more individual components. Those that ship separately should split, and those that ship at the same time as the SQL plugin, can stay. @anirudha what do you think we should keep/split? |
@YANG-DB I assume you've worked on this. Please close this once done. Thanks! |
New Repos generated from internal folder in SQL :
Main SQL repo remains the plugin container with focus on SQL / PPL engine |
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Coming from opensearch-project/opensearch-build#2188, it's not possible to release and tag the multiple components (
workbench
,sql-odbc
,sql-jdbc
, ...) that come out of this repo separately as, for example,2.0.0
. This means we must release all these parts together, or nobody can ever locate the correct code using tags.What solution would you like?
The plugins/drivers should live in their own repos.
What alternatives have you considered?
A tagging scheme such as opensearch-2.0.0 vs. opensearch-odbc-driver-2.0.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: