-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PROPOSAL] Standardize branching strategy #27
Comments
@dblock or @samuel-oci not sure if you have some context on this repository |
I propose that this entire repo be moved here: https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/tree/main/plugins in a subdirectory called "repository-oci," just like there is a repository-azure and a repository-s3. If not, then why not create repos for those other cloud file stores? |
I've opened an issue suggesting this: opensearch-project/OpenSearch#6148 |
Hi @anasalkouz @andrross @wbeckler , some context: I agree with @wbeckler suggestion, I think that moving it into the core for now will probably make sure it remains consistent with both versioning strategy and will make routine maintenance and upgrade efforts easier. |
Regarding the branching strategy, if we want to take more time before moving it into the core, using a proper conventional branching strategy can't hurt. |
I created a 1.3 branch from the current commit on main. After merging #33 I will create a 2.4 branch. |
The OpenSearch project generally follows a strategy of tracking 3 releases in parallel (next major, next minor, and current). See RELEASING.md for more details. This repository currently only has a main branch that is targeting version 1.2.4. Should we update to match the OpenSearch branching strategy. If not, why not?
Assuming the answer is yes, then the steps are (I think?):
1.2
, which will be the current commit onmain
, supporting version 1.2.41.3
and implement support for version 1.3.82.x
and implement support for 2.6.0main
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: