Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Simple Schema for Observability #2655

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
YANG-DB opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 8 comments · Fixed by #2940
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

[DOC] Simple Schema for Observability #2655

YANG-DB opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 8 comments · Fixed by #2940
Assignees
Labels
Closed - Complete Issue: Work is done and associated PRs closed v2.6.0
Milestone

Comments

@YANG-DB
Copy link
Member

YANG-DB commented Feb 4, 2023

What do you want to do?

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request. Provide a summary of the request and all versions that are affected.
With OpenSearch 2.6, we intend to release a standardization for conforming to a common & unified Observability schema which will be named Simple Schema for Observability (SSO).

This schema is compatible with OTEL schema & includes traces, logs & metrics. We also intend for supporting Alerts entity.
Simple Schema for Observability will also accept ECS logs when such structured log are present.

What other resources are available? Provide links to related issues, POCs, steps for testing, etc.

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

hdhalter commented Feb 6, 2023

Hi Aria, can you please take a look at this and let me know the scope? Thanks.

@ariamarble ariamarble added this to the v2.6 milestone Feb 6, 2023
@ariamarble
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @YANG-DB , I was wondering if we can get some clarification on this one. For documentation are we looking to explain our integration of SSO and OTel, like how it works under the hood, or are we looking to explain that basically "We support these things, here's how to configure it in Observability" ?

@YANG-DB
Copy link
Member Author

YANG-DB commented Feb 6, 2023

Hi
I think that for sso scheme we need to describe the high level purpose and use case without drilling into the actual implementation details...

@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS added 1 - Backlog Issue: The issue is unassigned or assigned but not started and removed untriaged labels Feb 9, 2023
@ariamarble
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @YANG-DB, thanks for clarifying. One further question. Can you tell me if SSO is still scheduled for release with 2.6?

@YANG-DB
Copy link
Member Author

YANG-DB commented Feb 9, 2023

Yes we are planning on releasing that on 2.6

@ariamarble ariamarble added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. and removed 1 - Backlog Issue: The issue is unassigned or assigned but not started labels Feb 15, 2023
@ariamarble
Copy link
Contributor

In progress and on track.

@ariamarble ariamarble added 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress and removed 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. labels Feb 20, 2023
@ariamarble
Copy link
Contributor

@YANG-DB can you review this PR for technical accuracy? - #2940

@YANG-DB
Copy link
Member Author

YANG-DB commented Feb 21, 2023

on it ...

@ariamarble ariamarble added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. 4 - Doc review PR: Doc review in progress 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress and removed 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. 4 - Doc review PR: Doc review in progress labels Feb 21, 2023
@ariamarble ariamarble added Closed - Complete Issue: Work is done and associated PRs closed and removed 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress labels Feb 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed - Complete Issue: Work is done and associated PRs closed v2.6.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants