Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor remote writeable entity and store to make it more reusable #15210

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

Bukhtawar
Copy link
Collaborator

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar commented Aug 12, 2024

Description

Aims to make the remote entity classes more reusable by moving them to commons and removing dependencies around remote cluster state

Related Issues

Resolves #15180

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Bukhtawar Khan <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 40f2d45: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for b71af8c: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 6379459: SUCCESS

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 35e804a: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.92%. Comparing base (2311195) to head (35e804a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #15210      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.89%   71.92%   +0.03%     
+ Complexity    63052    63033      -19     
============================================
  Files          5189     5190       +1     
  Lines        295202   295204       +2     
  Branches      42668    42668              
============================================
+ Hits         212229   212327      +98     
+ Misses        65586    65427     -159     
- Partials      17387    17450      +63     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar merged commit b6c80b1 into opensearch-project:main Aug 13, 2024
36 of 40 checks passed
@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Aug 13, 2024
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
…15210)

* Refactor remote writeable entity and store to make it more reusable

Signed-off-by: Bukhtawar Khan <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b6c80b1)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bukhtawar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
…15210) (#15221)

* Refactor remote writeable entity and store to make it more reusable

Signed-off-by: Bukhtawar Khan <[email protected]>
wdongyu pushed a commit to wdongyu/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
…pensearch-project#15210)

* Refactor remote writeable entity and store to make it more reusable

Signed-off-by: Bukhtawar Khan <[email protected]>
akolarkunnu pushed a commit to akolarkunnu/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
…pensearch-project#15210)

* Refactor remote writeable entity and store to make it more reusable

Signed-off-by: Bukhtawar Khan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch skip-changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants