Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Remote Store] Support repository registration during node bootstrap #8193

Closed
psychbot opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[Remote Store] Support repository registration during node bootstrap #8193

psychbot opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Severity-Blocker Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework Storage Issues and PRs relating to data and metadata storage v2.10.0

Comments

@psychbot
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Today we supports the registration of a repository via Put API call. But with remote backed storage we want all the indices to be remotely backed including system indices which essentially means that the repository registration has to be part of node bootstrap for system indices to be backed to remote store.

If the repository is not available during the bootstrap and the Opensearch cluster has the remote backed storage enabled will result in system indices being red.

Describe the solution you'd like
We would want to pass the repository information as part of yml file such that during the node bootstrap itself the repository gets registered.

Expected yml content

repositories: 
    my-fs-repository:
        type: "fs"
        location: "/mnt/snapshots"
    my-opensearch-repo:
        type: "s3"
        bucket: "bucket_name"
        region: "us-west-2"
@psychbot psychbot added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels Jun 21, 2023
@gbbafna gbbafna added Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework and removed untriaged labels Jun 21, 2023
@anasalkouz anasalkouz added Severity-Blocker v2.9.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.9.0' labels Jun 26, 2023
@mch2 mch2 added v2.10.0 and removed v2.9.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.9.0' labels Jul 19, 2023
@anasalkouz anasalkouz moved this from Todo to In Progress in Segment Replication Jul 27, 2023
@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar added the Storage Issues and PRs relating to data and metadata storage label Jul 27, 2023
@dreamer-89
Copy link
Member

dreamer-89 commented Aug 22, 2023

@psychbot : Will this issue be fixed with #8623 ? If yes, do you mind closing this issue in favour of #8623. If this is unrelated to #8623, then we needed your attention on this as this is targeted for 2.10.0 release and this is needed before we can test end-end (specially plugins) with remote store.

@psychbot
Copy link
Member Author

@dreamer-89 Yes, this can be closed in favour of #8623

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Segment Replication Aug 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Severity-Blocker Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework Storage Issues and PRs relating to data and metadata storage v2.10.0
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants