Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Tracing Framework]Strict check Span Processor implementation #7545

Closed
Tracked by #7542
Gaganjuneja opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8357
Closed
Tracked by #7542

[Tracing Framework]Strict check Span Processor implementation #7545

Gaganjuneja opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8357
Labels
distributed framework enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request

Comments

@Gaganjuneja
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Strict check Span Processor implementation to catch the instances where span are not closed properly.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@Gaganjuneja Gaganjuneja added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels May 12, 2023
@Gaganjuneja Gaganjuneja changed the title Strict check Span Processor implementation [Tracing Framework]Strict check Span Processor implementation May 12, 2023
@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented May 12, 2023

@Gaganjuneja would you mind please editing the issue and replacing "A clear and concise desc ..." with the actual description :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
distributed framework enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants