Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Searchable Snapshots] Add support for RemoteShardsBalancer #4777

Closed
Tracked by #2919
kotwanikunal opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #2919

[Searchable Snapshots] Add support for RemoteShardsBalancer #4777

kotwanikunal opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
distributed framework enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request feature New feature or request v2.4.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.4.0'

Comments

@kotwanikunal
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The remote search shards for searchable snapshots will rely on the data cache which will be configured as a part of search nodes. The allocation process should take into account these remote shards while assigning, moving or balancing them across clusters such that they are only assigned to nodes with the specific search role.

Additionally, in order to incorporate the remote nature of shards, the balancing logic has to be updated for both the remote and local shards since the requirements in terms of disk, shard count and other variables that are used for weight based calculation will differ for these shards.

Describe the solution you'd like

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request feature New feature or request v2.4.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.4.0' labels Oct 13, 2022
@DevPJ9
Copy link

DevPJ9 commented Oct 14, 2022

Hello, @kotwanikunal I would like to contribute.

@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal self-assigned this Oct 14, 2022
@kotwanikunal
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @DevPJ9! Thanks for taking your time to contribute to OpenSearch.
I missed assigning myself yesterday but I have been working on this issue, and it's currently not possible for multiple contributors to work on this.

We would love to have you contribute. This is a great place to start contributions for OpenSearch.
Let me know if you need any help in getting started.

@DevPJ9
Copy link

DevPJ9 commented Oct 14, 2022

Sure @kotwanikunal. I will look for some other issues. :)

@kotwanikunal
Copy link
Member Author

Merged with #4870.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
distributed framework enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request feature New feature or request v2.4.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.4.0'
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants