Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] ShardIndexingPressureConcurrentExecutionTests.testCoordinatingPrimaryThreadedUpdateToShardLimits assertion error #2241

Closed
Tracked by #1715
dreamer-89 opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5168

Comments

@dreamer-89
Copy link
Member

dreamer-89 commented Feb 24, 2022

REPRODUCE WITH: ./gradlew ':server:test' --tests "org.opensearch.index.ShardIndexingPressureConcurrentExecutionTests.testCoordinatingPrimaryThreadedUpdateToShardLimits" -Dtests.seed=D6BACFF135EA7C0B -Dtests.security.manager=true -Dtests.jvm.argline="-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=64m" -Dtests.locale=bg -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Novosibirsk -Druntime.java=17
...
  2> java.lang.AssertionError
        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D6BACFF135EA7C0B:44EAAEC902695D33]:0)
        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:87)
        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:42)
        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:53)
        at org.opensearch.index.ShardIndexingPressureConcurrentExecutionTests.testCoordinatingPrimaryThreadedUpdateToShardLimits(ShardIndexingPressureConcurrentExecutionTests.java:74)

❌ Gradle Check failure 9e413b4
Log 2773

Reports 2773

Identified in #2238

@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 changed the title testCoordinatingPrimaryThreadedUpdateToShardLimits [BUG] ShardIndexingPressureConcurrentExecutionTests.testCoordinatingPrimaryThreadedUpdateToShardLimits assertion error Feb 24, 2022
@andrross
Copy link
Member

andrross commented Nov 8, 2022

Another failure here: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/6616/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants