Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Remote State] Use DiffUtils to find updates in Indices in RemoteClusterStateService #14177

Open
shiv0408 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Cluster Manager enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request

Comments

@shiv0408
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

Currently we have added custom methods in RemoteClusterStateService which can be replaced by DiffUtils. This creates duplication and overhead in maintenance.

Describe the solution you'd like

Rather than having new methods, use existing methods to find the changes in state.

Related component

Cluster Manager

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@shiv0408 shiv0408 added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels Jun 11, 2024
@shiv0408 shiv0408 changed the title [Feature Request] Use DiffUtils to find updates in Indices and Custom objects in RemoteClusterStateService` [Remote State] Use DiffUtils to find updates in Indices and Custom objects in RemoteClusterStateService Jun 11, 2024
@soosinha
Copy link
Member

For custom objects, it was done here: #14338
For indices, it is pending

@shiv0408 shiv0408 changed the title [Remote State] Use DiffUtils to find updates in Indices and Custom objects in RemoteClusterStateService [Remote State] Use DiffUtils to find updates in Indices in RemoteClusterStateService Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Cluster Manager enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants