You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We observe the following problem: if the search contains a small number of hits, e.g. 1-2 pcs., the size of the window with the list of records does not change when the filter is expanded (e.g. the time interval is increased). Thus, the search is performed inside the window with previous smaller sizes, which is extremely inconvenient.
To Reproduce
Create a filter so that you only have 1-2 records.
Then expand the time interval or exclude some kind of filter to have more hits.
The size of the window with the list of records will remain the same and you will be forced to search inside this small window.
Expected behavior
The window size should expand accordingly to the selected maximum number of records on one sheet.
Check my comments in #5659 and #5678, where I uploaded videos for how we resolve the problem. We fixed this in 2.12 which will soon be released in public. You could now play with our main or 2.12 branch.
If you agree with me, could we just close this issue and follow on the other two?
Describe the bug
We observe the following problem: if the search contains a small number of hits, e.g. 1-2 pcs., the size of the window with the list of records does not change when the filter is expanded (e.g. the time interval is increased). Thus, the search is performed inside the window with previous smaller sizes, which is extremely inconvenient.
To Reproduce
The size of the window with the list of records will remain the same and you will be forced to search inside this small window.
Expected behavior
The window size should expand accordingly to the selected maximum number of records on one sheet.
OpenSearch Version
2.11.1
Dashboards Version
2.11.1
Plugins
Screenshots
Host/Environment (please complete the following information):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: