Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Session Proposal: TC53 meeting #280

Closed
6 of 11 tasks
dtex opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed
6 of 11 tasks

Session Proposal: TC53 meeting #280

dtex opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
Austin 2020 Collaborator Summit Cross-Project Track for proposals that foster collaboration across projects Session Proposal A session proposal for the Collaboration Summit

Comments

@dtex
Copy link

dtex commented May 8, 2020

Proposal

TC53 - ECMAScript Modules for Embedded Systems Meeting

Quarterly, "in-person" meeting for ECMA TC53

  • Collaborate
  • Workshop
  • Talk

Timezone of facilitator

  • Pacific Time (US) PDT UTC-7

Estimated duration of the session

Typically in-person TC53 meetings last a full two days, but this virtual agenda is TBD.

Follow-up / Set-up sessions (if any)

Resuscitating IoT with JavaScript - Peter Hoddie & Lizzie Prader (Peter is the TC53 Chair)

Level

  • Beginner
  • Intermediate
  • Advanced

Pre-requisite knowledge

None

Describe the session

TC53 is the ECMA standards body charged with supporting activities that would lead to an ECMAScript-based platform for embedded systems and extensions to ECMAScript. This includes defining requirements, harmonizing user communities, and studying the impact on privacy and security.

Session facilitator(s), Github handle(s) and timezone(s)

Peter Hoddie (@phoddie) - PDT

Additional context (optional)

This meeting was originally scheduled to take place in Austin during the Summit to facilitate participation for attendees. Once the Summit became virtual we chose to do the same for TC53, but we still want the event to be available for anyone who is interested.


This section is for contributors handling Collaborator Summit logistics

Track

Triage

  • Track chosen
  • Scheduled
@dtex dtex added Austin 2020 Collaborator Summit Session Proposal A session proposal for the Collaboration Summit labels May 8, 2020
@jorydotcom jorydotcom added the Cross-Project Track for proposals that foster collaboration across projects label Jun 5, 2020
@jorydotcom
Copy link
Collaborator

This is on the schedule!

  • Starting June 25 at 10 a.m.
  • Continuing June 26 at 10 a.m.

@jorydotcom
Copy link
Collaborator

Notes from the meetings

@dtex do you recall if this was recorded?

@dtex
Copy link
Author

dtex commented Jul 3, 2020

Yes, at least some of it was. I believe @phoddie or @lizzieprader will know where to find it

@phoddie
Copy link

phoddie commented Jul 3, 2020

I have a video file recording of each day. Ecma doesn't usually post recordings of meetings, so I'm not sure what to do with them. I'm happy to follow the sense of the committee.

@jorydotcom
Copy link
Collaborator

@phoddie @dtex the foundation is posting recorded summit sessions on its YouTube Channel, we're happy to post them there if you want. My assumption is that it would be ok sense it was mostly an open meeting but up to you! 🤷

@phoddie
Copy link

phoddie commented Jul 3, 2020

How about one of you post to the TC53 mailing list that we intend to post these early next week? Give people an opportunity to object, and then we can move ahead.

FWWI - we did announce during the meeting when recording began, so it was known.

@jorydotcom - meanwhile, let me know where to upload the files. Or maybe we just put them on the spiffy new EcmaTC53 YouTube channel?

@WaleedAshraf
Copy link
Member

Closing this issue as no further action is needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Austin 2020 Collaborator Summit Cross-Project Track for proposals that foster collaboration across projects Session Proposal A session proposal for the Collaboration Summit
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants