[PRE REVIEW]: Litrepl: Literate Paper Processor Promoting Transparency More Than Reproducibility

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @sergei-mironov (Sergei Mironov)
Repository: https://github.com/sergei-mironov/litrepl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v3.12.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a180a5cc8c73c740e4ed3de22218c09f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a180a5cc8c73c740e4ed3de22218c09f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a180a5cc8c73c740e4ed3de22218c09f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a180a5cc8c73c740e4ed3de22218c09f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sergei-mironov. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@sergei-mironov if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1109/52.311070 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3059263 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01720-9 is OK
- 10.1017/S0956796810000195 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Literate Programming
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Jupyter Notebooks - a publishing format for reprod...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Recursive Functions of Symbolic Expressions and th...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A Programming Language
- No DOI given, and none found for title: APL Demonstration 1975
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Terminal graphics protocol
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Lark
- No DOI given, and none found for title: POSIX Standard: Base Specifications, Issue 8
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Project Jupyter: Computational Narratives as the E...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1109/mcse.2007.53 may be a valid DOI for title: IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Compu...
- Entry without DOI or title found

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.05 s (1122.2 files/s, 224293.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          12            191            228           1729
Bourne Shell                     8            220             34           1500
Markdown                        11            427             76           1357
SVG                              1              0              0            837
TeX                              6            161             50            819
C/C++ Header                     2             85            306            729
vim script                       3             60             48            629
Nix                              3             67             28            427
make                             1             16              0             85
INI                              1              5              0             45
Text                             3              6              0             28
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            51           1238            770           8185
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   585	Sergei Mironov
   115	Sergey Mironov

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1870

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Rclean: A Tool for Writing Cleaner, More Transparent Code
Submitting author: @MKLau
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Retired)
Reviewers: @danielskatz
Similarity score: 0.6292

Caliban: Docker-based job manager for reproducible workflows
Submitting author: @sritchie
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @lukasheinrich, @arokem
Similarity score: 0.6019

Ipyannotator: the infinitely hackable annotation framework
Submitting author: @itepifanio
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @csadorf, @matthewfeickert
Similarity score: 0.5965

Reducing the efforts to create reproducible analysis code with FieldTrip
Submitting author: @matsvanes
Handling editor: @crsl4 (Active)
Reviewers: @gflofst, @ashahide
Similarity score: 0.5962

funsies: A minimalist, distributed and dynamic workflow engine
Submitting author: @clavigne
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @gflofst, @vijaysm
Similarity score: 0.5957

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @sergei-mironov - thanks for your submission. As it's not clear to me that this is research software as defined by JOSS, the editors will now discuss this. You should hear back in a week or two.

If this does pass this review, I will then ask you to reduce the length of the paper to closer to 1000 words, the JOSS maximum. There also appear to a be couple of reference/DOI issues that we will also discuss.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[sergei-mironov]

👋 @sergei-mironov - thanks for your submission. As it's not clear to me that this is research software as defined by JOSS, the editors will now discuss this. You should hear back in a week or two.

If this does pass this review, I will then ask you to reduce the length of the paper to closer to 1000 words, the JOSS maximum. There also appear to a be couple of reference/DOI issues that we will also discuss.

@danielskatz Thank you for the feedback. I have added the suggested DOI and updated the summary to indicate that the outcomes of the described project serve as a research instrument.