Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: beamxs - A Python Library for Design and Analysis of Simply Supported Beams #7581

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @SpaciousCoder78 (Aryan Karamtoth)
Repository: https://github.com/SpaciousCoder78/beam-xs
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.1.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ada35fa1092bf7da10132771b6c66701"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ada35fa1092bf7da10132771b6c66701/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ada35fa1092bf7da10132771b6c66701/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ada35fa1092bf7da10132771b6c66701)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @SpaciousCoder78. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@SpaciousCoder78 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 3 (PE) Physics and Engineering labels Dec 11, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- None

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.62913/engj.v28i2.572 may be a valid DOI for title:  A Simplified Look at Partially Restrained Beams 

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.01 s (1378.1 files/s, 72142.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              6              0              0            155
Markdown                         2             62              0            150
Python                           7            112            239            150
YAML                             3             37             23             61
HTML                             1              6              0             43
TeX                              1              0              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            20            217            262            568
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    26	Aryan Karamtoth
    15	SpaciousCoder78

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 481

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GXBeam: A Pure Julia Implementation of Geometrically Exact Beam Theory
Submitting author: @taylormcd
Handling editor: @prashjha (Active)
Reviewers: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, @PetrKryslUCSD
Similarity score: 0.7098

CRATE: A Python package to perform fast material simulations
Submitting author: @BernardoFerreira
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @RahulSundar, @atzberg, @Extraweich, @kingyin3613
Similarity score: 0.6571

Xbim.Essentials: a library for interoperable building information applications
Submitting author: @CBenghi
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Haacked
Similarity score: 0.6561

BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets
Submitting author: @akashdhruv
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @rvg296, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.6555

beamshapes: a Python package to generate directivity patterns for various sound source models
Submitting author: @thejasvibr
Handling editor: @faroit (Active)
Reviewers: @nils-werner, @hagenw
Similarity score: 0.6482

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@kyleniemeyer
Copy link

Hello @SpaciousCoder78, ynfortunately, your submission is too small to be reviewed by JOSS - it does not meet our requirements for substantial scholarly work.

Please consider alternate methods for publishing / getting credit for your work:

  • Follow GitHub’s guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.
  • Enquire whether your software might be considered by communities such as rOpenSci and pyOpenSci.

@kyleniemeyer
Copy link

@editorialbot reject

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper rejected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants