[PRE REVIEW]: dlr.esy.grid.match: A Grid Matching & Conversion Tool

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @OriolRaventosDLR (Oriol Raventós)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/dlr.esy.grid.match
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @OriolRaventosDLR. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@OriolRaventosDLR if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112186 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112163 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112055 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10776749 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.3390/en12244728 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111995 is OK
- 10.1016/J.RESS.2013.10.003 is OK
- 10.1038/35019019 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and functio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Comparing clusterings: an overview
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (663.8 files/s, 191743.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              3              0             56           1909
Python                           7            391            756            788
Markdown                         3            112              0            406
TeX                              1             11              0            124
TOML                             1              5              0             39
YAML                             1              1              3             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            16            520            815           3287
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    65	Ontje Lünsdorf
    17	rave_or
     3	Francesco Witte
     3	Theresa Groß

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1415

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GridapDistributed: a massively parallel finite element toolbox in Julia
Submitting author: @amartinhuertas
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @Leticia-maria, @jedbrown
Similarity score: 0.7025

fieldcompare: A Python package for regression testing simulation results
Submitting author: @dglaeser
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @WilliamJamieson
Similarity score: 0.6986

lczexplore: an R package to explore Local Climate Zone classifications
Submitting author: @MGousseff
Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active)
Reviewers: @matthiasdemuzere, @wcjochem
Similarity score: 0.6900

GeoClimate: a Geospatial processing toolbox for environmental and climate studies
Submitting author: @ebocher
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @abhishekvp, @omshinde, @arbennett
Similarity score: 0.6847

LinkingLines: Using the Hough Transform to Cluster Line Segments and Mesoscale Feature Extraction
Submitting author: @aikubo
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @evetion, @nialov
Similarity score: 0.6794

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @OriolRaventosDLR - thanks for your submission. Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[danielskatz]

👋 @OriolRaventosDLR - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.