Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: TinkerModellor: An Efficient Tool for Building Biological Systems in Tinker Simulations #6213

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
Makefile pre-review Python rejected TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @Hsuchein (Xujian Wang)
Repository: https://github.com/WanluLigroupUCSD/TinkerModellor
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v1.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/728ee943c9ea60d232d04361b3f6b985"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/728ee943c9ea60d232d04361b3f6b985/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/728ee943c9ea60d232d04361b3f6b985/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/728ee943c9ea60d232d04361b3f6b985)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Hsuchein. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Hsuchein if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials labels Jan 11, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (659.8 files/s, 50375.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          14            191            208            533
XML                              1              0              0            307
Markdown                         3             69              0            153
TeX                              1             18              0            153
YAML                             3              1              4             99
make                             1              4              4             12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            23            283            216           1257
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1243

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 may be a valid DOI for title: GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers
- 10.1021/jacs.6b12265.s001 may be a valid DOI for title: The Importance of the Scaffold for de Novo Enzymes: A Case Study with Kemp Eliminase
- 10.26434/chemrxiv.13615853 may be a valid DOI for title: Local Electric Fields as a Natural Switch of Heme-Iron Protein Reactivity
- 10.1039/d3sc02982d may be a valid DOI for title: From random to rational: improving enzyme design through electric fields, second coordination sphere interactions, and conformational dynamics
- 10.3390/antib7030023 may be a valid DOI for title: OptMAVEn-2.0: De novo Design of Variable Antibody Regions against Targeted Antigen Epitopes
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-821978-2.00018-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Electric Fields and Enzyme Catalysis
- 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01556 may be a valid DOI for title: Catalytic Principles from Natural Enzymes and Translational Design Strategies for Synthetic Catalysts
- 10.21105/joss.02576 may be a valid DOI for title: ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code
- 10.1021/ct200304d may be a valid DOI for title: Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01048.s001 may be a valid DOI for title: Characterizing Ion-Polymer Interactions in Aqueous Environment with Electric Fields
- 10.1088/2516-1075/ac509f may be a valid DOI for title: Beyond structural analysis of molecular enzyme-inhibitor interactions
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01169.s001 may be a valid DOI for title: AMOEBA Polarizable Atomic Multipole Force Field for Nucleic Acids
- 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00765.s001 may be a valid DOI for title: Tuning the Catalytic Activity of Synthetic Enzyme KE15 with DNA
- 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 may be a valid DOI for title: VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01286.s001 may be a valid DOI for title: Implicit Solvents for the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

BioSimSpace: An interoperable Python framework for biomolecular simulation
Submitting author: @lohedges
Handling editor: @will-rowe (Retired)
Reviewers: @amritagos, @richardjgowers
Similarity score: 0.8124

GEMMI: A library for structural biology
Submitting author: @wojdyr
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @jamesrhester, @dominiquesydow
Similarity score: 0.8118

ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code
Submitting author: @valeriewelborn
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz
Similarity score: 0.8074

GIMS: Graphical Interface for Materials Simulations
Submitting author: @kokookster
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @marshallmcdonnell, @jgostick
Similarity score: 0.8056

SIMsalabim: An open-source drift-diffusion simulator for semiconductor devices
Submitting author: @ljakoster
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @UTH-Tuan, @shahmoradi, @roderickmackenzie
Similarity score: 0.8051

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@Hsuchein thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC for this track. I have just checked your repository, and reviewed the above software report (stating number of lines of code etc.). Unfortunately this work is not in scope for JOSS as it stands as it does not conform to our substantial scholarly effort criteria.

We will now proceed to reject this submission.

We hope you will consider JOSS for any future (re)submissions that are of a more substantial nature.

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot reject

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper rejected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Makefile pre-review Python rejected TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants