[PRE REVIEW]: The Argonne Nuclear Data Exploration Software (ANDES)

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @DeltaSigmaGamma (Daniel Santiago-Gonzalez)
Repository: https://gitlab.phy.anl.gov/nuclear-data/andes
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.0
Editor: @kellyrowland
Reviewers: @adrien-matta, @fanurs
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3bdd29252caa91a928e3c7b9f65b201"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3bdd29252caa91a928e3c7b9f65b201/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3bdd29252caa91a928e3c7b9f65b201/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f3bdd29252caa91a928e3c7b9f65b201)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DeltaSigmaGamma. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DeltaSigmaGamma if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (358.5 files/s, 202946.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                              3            253            420           4868
TeX                              1             25              0            186
Markdown                         2             45              0            142
C/C++ Header                     2             30             32            130
YAML                             2              6             21             45
make                             1              6              4             14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            11            365            477           5385
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 731

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1103/PhysRev.75.1969 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRev.75.1766.2 is OK
- 10.1126/science.145.3636.999 is OK
- 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030002 is OK
- 10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-6596/219/4/042055 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.172502 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6552/aa811a is OK
- 10.1063/1.1945075 is OK
- 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001 is OK
- 10.1088/1674-1137/abddae is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.4135/9781446247501.n2125 may be a valid DOI for title: Isotopic enrichment

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

AtomNeb: IDL Library for Atomic Data of Ionized Nebulae
Submitting author: @danehkar
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @mgalloy, @mdpiper
Similarity score: 0.8148

nrCascadeSim - A simulation tool for nuclear recoil cascades resulting from neutron capture
Submitting author: @villaa
Handling editor: @lucydot (Active)
Reviewers: @matthewfeickert, @altavir
Similarity score: 0.8137

ASCENDS: Advanced data SCiENce toolkit for Non-Data Scientists
Submitting author: @ornlpmcp
Handling editor: @terrytangyuan (Retired)
Reviewers: @zhampel, @jrbourbeau
Similarity score: 0.8095

sumo: Command-line tools for plotting and analysis of periodic ab initio calculations
Submitting author: @utf
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @cfgoldsmith
Similarity score: 0.8076

CSaransh : Software Suite to Study Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Collision Cascades
Submitting author: @haptork
Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired)
Reviewers: @jmborr, @arose
Similarity score: 0.8052

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @DeltaSigmaGamma, thanks for your submission to JOSS. We'll use this pre-review issue to assign an editor and find reviewers; unfortunately, we don't have any editors available to handle your submission right now, so I need to put this on our waitlist until someone can edit it.

In the meantime, any reviewer recommendations you can make would be welcome.

[DeltaSigmaGamma]

@kyleniemeyer Have you found an editor to handle my submission?

Also, I've looked at the list of available reviewers (https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers), and here are some suggested reviewers for my article:

• Adrien Mata https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1933
• Chi-En Teh https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2699

Please let me know if you need anything else. The original submission was months ago (Jan/10/2024) so I'd like to see this submission gain some momentum.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @kellyrowland as editor

Hi @kellyrowland, could you edit this?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[kellyrowland]

hi @kyleniemeyer can do 👍

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot assign @kellyrowland as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @kellyrowland is now the editor

[kellyrowland]

hi @adrien-matta @fanurs 👋 would you be available for and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission?

[adrien-matta]

Hello Kelly,
Yes I am interested in reviewing this submission and could surely make sometime to look at it!

Cheers,
Adrien.

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot add @adrien-matta to reviewers

[editorialbot]

@adrien-matta added to the reviewers list!

[fanurs]

hi @adrien-matta @fanurs 👋 would you be available for and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission?

Thanks for the invite! I'd be happy to review this submission.

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot add @fanurs to reviewers

[editorialbot]

@fanurs added to the reviewers list!

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6546.