[PRE REVIEW]: fff_segmenter: A signal segmentation script for acoustic FFF fabrication data in MATLAB

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @thiago-glissoi (Thiago Glissoi Lopes)
Repository: https://github.com/thiago-glissoi/FFF-Line-Segmentation
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.0
Editor: @bmcfee
Reviewers: @olivecha, @DARSakthi
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4a0136baf38c42b13046e84b01fdd6f7"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4a0136baf38c42b13046e84b01fdd6f7/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4a0136baf38c42b13046e84b01fdd6f7/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4a0136baf38c42b13046e84b01fdd6f7)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thiago-glissoi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@thiago-glissoi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.02 s (269.2 files/s, 67118.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATLAB                           1            234            106            887
Markdown                         2             39              0            104
TeX                              1              7              0             83
YAML                             1              1              4             18
JSON                             1              0              0             13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             6            281            110           1105
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1018

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3390/ecsa-9-13285 is OK
- 10.1007/s00170-015-7809-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.038 is OK
- 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.160 is OK
- 10.3390/CGPM2020-07159 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

@thiago-glissoi - thanks for your submission.

Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or two.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[danielskatz]

👋 @thiago-glissoi - we'll go ahead and proceed to review

[danielskatz]

👋 @bmcfee - would you be willing to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot add @bmcfee as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @bmcfee is now the editor

[bmcfee]

Sure - happy to!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot add @olivecha as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@olivecha added to the reviewers list!

[bmcfee]

Just a heads up that I'm still working on finding a second reviewer.

[thiago-glissoi]

Thank you for your attention.

In order to help with this matter, I would like to suggest two researchers in the field.

Haixi Wu
wuhaixi (at) zju.edu.cn

Christiane Wendt
christiane.wendt (at) alum.uca.es

Hopefully these suggestions work well.

Best regards.

Thiago Glissoi Lopes

[bmcfee]

Update - still working through reviewer invitations and hoping for a positive response soon.

[bmcfee]

Updating again: I've been out with the covid for the past week or so, but am back on this and continuing the reviewer search. Thanks for your patience!

[bmcfee]

Last batch of review invitations did not get any responses. I took a pause on this for the Thanksgiving holiday last week, but have now resumed sending out invites. Sorry this is taking so long!

[thiago-glissoi]

No problem with the delay. The authors appreciate your attention.

In order to help with this matter, I would like to suggest a few more researchers in the field.

Ismail Fidan
ifidan (at) tntech.edu

Sang Won Lee
sangwonl (at) skku.edu

Md. Hazrat Ali
md.ali (at) nu.edu.kz

Syuhei Kurokawa
kurobe- (at) mech.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Yan Wang
yan.wang (at) me.gatech.edu

Zhonghua Yu
yuzhh (at) zju.edu.cn

Hopefully these suggestions work well.

Best regards.

Thiago Glissoi Lopes

[bmcfee]

Thanks Thiago! Your patience is much appreciated - we've been unusually unlucky in getting responses (in either direction!) on this one, but hopefully one of your suggestions will pan out.

[danielskatz]

👋 @bmcfee - Hi, what's happened with this? Can we figure out a way to find reviewers and get this started?

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PFEIFER: Preprocessing Framework for Electrograms Intermittently Fiducialized from Experimental Recordings
Submitting author: @bzenger
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @CristianaCorsi
Similarity score: 0.8110

pyFBS: A Python package for Frequency Based Substructuring
Submitting author: @tb93
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @ngoiz, @LolloCappo, @Gunnstein
Similarity score: 0.7991

Dryft: A Python and MATLAB package to correct drifting ground reaction force signals during treadmill running
Submitting author: @alcantarar
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @agricolab, @DARSakthi, @mwptrsn
Similarity score: 0.7917

3dfier: automatic reconstruction of 3D city models
Submitting author: @hugoledoux
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @GANys, @chenkianwee
Similarity score: 0.7912

Open-Source Hypothalamic-ForniX (OSHy-X) Atlases and Segmentation Tool for 3T and 7T
Submitting author: @Cadaei-Yuvxvs
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @a3sha2, @kaczmarj
Similarity score: 0.7908

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

☝️ @bmcfee – not sure if any of these might be similar enough to find possible reviewers here.

[bmcfee]

Hi @danielskatz and @arfon ! The short update here is that I've had near total strike-out with contacting potential reviewers so far, and have had limited time to follow up in the past couple of weeks due to life intervening. Thanks @arfon for the similar papers recs though - I'll check through those to identify a new batch of potential reviewers and hopefully get this unstuck.

Sorry (again!) for the slowness here, and thanks for everyone's patience!

[danielskatz]

@thiago-glissoi - I wonder if you have any other reviewer suggestions as well?

And @olivecha, in case you have thoughts on other possible reviewers, please let us know as well.

[thiago-glissoi]

Hi @danielskatz

Yes, I can provide other reviewer suggestions.

Arthur Fiocchi
arthurfiocchi (at) ufu.br

Neri Volpato
nvolpato (at) utfpr.edu.br

[bmcfee]

Updating here: I have identified a reviewer that will become available for this in a few weeks, but I'm still looking to see if anyone can take it up immediately. Either way, I hope to get this moving very shortly!

[thiago-glissoi]

Hi @bmcfee !

Thank you for the update.
If any input from the authors is necessary at this point, please let me know.

[danielskatz]

👋 @bmcfee - I just wanted to see if this is still still moving along?

[bmcfee]

@danielskatz yes, today was my self-imposed deadline for pulling in the backup reviewer I mentioned previously. I'll get that going later today and this should be unstuck.

[danielskatz]

great, thanks!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot add @DARSakthi as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@DARSakthi added to the reviewers list!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6620.