[PRE REVIEW]: funsies: A minimalist, distributed and dynamic workflow engine

[whedon]

Submitting author: @clavigne (Cyrille Lavigne)
Repository: https://github.com/aspuru-guzik-group/funsies
Version: v0.7.0
Editor: @diehlpk
Reviewers: @gflofst, @vijaysm
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @clavigne. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@clavigne if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.15 s (514.0 files/s, 103559.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            10            639              0           6867
Python                          57           1304           1324           4879
Markdown                         6             75              0            380
TeX                              1             27              0            294
YAML                             1              0              0             40
INI                              2              3              0             29
Bourne Shell                     1             11             23             14
Mako                             1              0              0              8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            79           2059           1347          12511
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'cbb507920ec4c86c92184295' was
gathered on 2021/04/30.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Cyrille Lavigne                317         23835          14394          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Cyrille Lavigne            7316           30.7          2.2               12.40

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1063/5.0006002 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0004835 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0007045 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0004997 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0005188 is OK
- 10.1063/1.5144261 is OK
- 10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.017 is OK
- 10.1145/1330017.1330019 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.29032.2 is OK
- 10.1145/2807591.2807623 is OK
- 10.1007/10968987_3 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-63688-7_19 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.26434/chemrxiv.13008500.v1 may be a valid DOI for title: Automatic discovery of chemical reactions using imposed activation
- 10.21276/ijre.2018.5.5.4 may be a valid DOI for title: MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters

INVALID DOIs

- None

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon invite @diehlpk as editor

[diehlpk]

@whedon assign @diehlpk as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @diehlpk

[diehlpk]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Sure, I can take this paper.

[diehlpk]

@clavigne Could you please name some potential reviewers?

[diehlpk]

Hey @daissi @wjakethompson @vijaysm @gflofst @camillescott would you be interested to review this paper?

[camillescott]

Sure, this is in my wheelhouse.

[vijaysm]

If the others are busy, sure I can review it. I just have some deadlines near term, but can start in 2-3 weeks or so, if that works.

[diehlpk]

@whedon assign @camillescott as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @camillescott is now a reviewer

[diehlpk]

@vijaysm I will wait for a few more days and if I could not find one additional reviewer, I will add you.

[wjakethompson]

I very rarely use Python, so this one is a little outside of my comfort zone.

[clavigne]

sorry for the delay, Ive had a very busy week.

I'd recommend Johannes Koester or someone from his group, Paolo Di Tommaso and Hilary J. Oliver. They are all working on similar codes (inspirations of sort).

Thank you!

[gflofst]

@diehlpk I would like to. My other one is finally making progress on the requested changes. I should be able to do this as well.

[diehlpk]

@whedon add @gflofst as reviewer

[diehlpk]

Thanks @camillescott and @gflofst for reviewing the paper.

[diehlpk]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3274.

[diehlpk]

@vijaysm I will wait for a few more days and if I could not find one additional reviewer, I will add you.

@vijaysm Can you still review the paper? One reviewer disappeared and I could need some help here.

[vijaysm]

@diehlpk I'm swamped until end of next week with a conference. But can review this after. Let me know if that timeline would work.

[diehlpk]

@diehlpk I'm swamped until end of next week with a conference. But can review this after. Let me know if that timeline would work.

Sure, that will work.

[diehlpk]

@whedon add @vijaysm as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @vijaysm is now a reviewer

[clavigne]

@diehlpk Any news on this? Thanks.

[diehlpk]

@clavigne Not really @camillescott never responded, and I asked @vijaysm to replace her. We need to wait for his review to proceed.

[diehlpk]

@whedon remove @camillescott as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @camillescott is no longer a reviewer

[diehlpk]

@vijaysm How is your review going?

[vijaysm]

Thanks for the reminder. I'll start the review this Friday and should be able to complete it within a week.